MRCP and MRI findings in 9 patients with autoimmune pancreatitis

Pancreatic cancer: from early detection to personalized treatment approaches

Pancreatic cancer is notorious for its persistently poor prognosis and health outcomes, so some of the questions that may be begged are "Why is it mostly diagnosed at end stage?", "What could we possibly do with the advancing technology in today's world to detect early pancreatic cancer and intervene?", and "Are there any implementation of the existing novel imaging technologies?". Well, to start with, this is in part because the majority of patients presented would already have reached a locally advanced or metastatic stage at the time of diagnosis due to its highly aggressive characteristics and lack of symptoms. Due to this striking disparity in survival, advancements in early detection and intervention are likely to significantly increase patients' survival. Presently, screening is frequently used in high-risk individuals in order to obtain an early pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Having a thorough understanding of the pathogenesis and risk factors of pancreatic cancer may enable us to identify individuals at high risk, diagnose the disease early, and begin treatment promptly. In this review, the authors outline the clinical hurdles to early pancreatic cancer detection, describe high-risk populations, and discuss current screening initiatives for high-risk individuals. The ultimate goal of this current review is to study the roles of both traditional and novel imaging modalities for early pancreatic cancer detection. A lot of the novel imaging techniques mentioned seem promising, but they need to be put to the test on a large scale and may need to be combined with other non-invasive biomarkers before they can be widely used.

Imaging Modalities for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Current State and Future Research Opportunities

Simple Summary

While survival rates for many cancers have improved dramatically over the last 20 years, patients with pancreatic cancer have persistently poor outcomes. The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer are not suitable for potentially curative surgery due to locally advanced or metastatic disease stage at diagnosis. Therefore, early detection would potentially improve survival of pancreatic cancer patients through earlier intervention. Here, we present clinical challenges in the early detection of pancreatic cancer, characterise high risk groups for pancreatic cancer and current screening programs in high-risk individuals. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the role of both established and novel imaging modalities for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we investigate innovative imaging techniques for early detection of pancreatic cancer, but its widespread application requires further investigation and potentially a combination with other non-invasive biomarkers.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most lethal malignancies, is increasing in incidence. While survival rates for many cancers have improved dramatically over the last 20 years, people with pancreatic cancer have persistently poor outcomes. Potential cure for pancreatic cancer involves surgical resection and adjuvant therapy. However, approximately 85% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are not suitable for potentially curative therapy due to locally advanced or metastatic disease stage. Because of this stark survival contrast, any improvement in early detection would likely significantly improve survival of patients with pancreatic cancer through earlier intervention. This comprehensive scoping review describes the current evidence on groups at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer, including individuals with inherited predisposition, pancreatic cystic lesions, diabetes, and pancreatitis. We review the current roles of imaging modalities focusing on early detection of pancreatic cancer. Additionally, we propose the use of advanced imaging modalities to identify early, potentially curable pancreatic cancer in high-risk cohorts. We discuss innovative imaging techniques for early detection of pancreatic cancer, but its widespread application requires further investigation and potentially a combination with other non-invasive biomarkers.

Use of MRI signal intensity ratio to differentiate between autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of the lesion-to-erector spinae signal intensity ratio (SIR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRI data of 21 patients with AIP and 27 patients with PDA were analysed retrospectively, and the signal intensity in pancreatic lesions and erector spinae muscles at the same level on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), arterial phase (AP) imaging, and delayed phase (DP) imaging was measured for calculation of SIRs.

RESULTS

The mean SIRs of the pancreatic lesions and erector spinae from T2WI, AP, and DP images of AIP patients were 0.96, 1.27, and 1.42, respectively, while those of PDA patients were 1.35, 0.80, and 0.91, respectively. The differences in the SIRs between the AIP and PDA groups were statistically significant (p<0.001), with corresponding area under curve (AUC) values of 0.925, 0.906, and 0.961, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for the SIRs on T2WI, AP and DP images were 1.21, 1.01, and 1.08, respectively. SIR values < 1.21 on T2WI, >1.01 on AP imaging, and >1.08 on DP imaging identified AIP with sensitivities of 85.7%, 90.5%, and 90.5%, respectively, and specificities of 81.5%, 74.6%, and 81.5%, respectively. The AUC values for SIRs did not differ significantly between T2WI and DP imaging or AP and DP imaging (Z = 0.778, p=0.436; Z = 1.279, p=0.201).

CONCLUSION

The SIRs of pancreatic lesions and erector spinae on T2WI, AP, and DP images can be used to differentiate AIP from PDA.

Diagnostic imaging guide for autoimmune pancreatitis

The International Consensus Diagnosis Criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been published internationally for the diagnosis of AIP. However, since the revisions in 2006 and 2011, the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis 2018 have been published. The criteria were revised based the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria 2011, and included descriptions of characteristic imaging findings such as (1) pancreatic enlargement and (2) distinctive narrowing of the main pancreatic duct. In addition, pancreatic duct images obtained by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography as well as conventional endoscopic retrograde pancreatography were newly adopted. The guideline explains some characteristic imaging findings, but does not contain descriptions of the imaging methods, such as detailed imaging parameters and optimal timings of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. It is a matter of concern that imaging methods can vary from hospital to hospital. Although other characteristic findings have been reported, these findings were not described in the guideline. The present paper describes the imaging methods for obtaining optimal images and the characteristic imaging findings with the aim of standardizing image quality and improving diagnostic accuracy when radiologists diagnose AIP in actual clinical settings.

Type 1 and Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Distinctive Clinical and Pathological Features, But Are There Any Differences at Magnetic Resonance? Experience From a Referral Center

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging findings of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and to find radiological patterns that could differentiate type 1 and type 2 AIP.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with diagnosis of AIP were enrolled. Image analysis included pancreatic signal intensity abnormalities, enhancement pattern, extrapancreatic involvement, and main pancreatic duct alterations.

RESULTS

Pancreatic parenchyma resulted in hypointensity on T1-weighted images in 65 (98.5%) of 66 cases in type 1 and in 17 (94.5%) of 18 in type 2 (P > 0.05) and in hyperintensity on T2-weighted images in 41 (62%) of 66 and in 15 (83.4%) of 18, respectively (P > 0.05). Lesions were hypovascular in 64 (97%) of 66 cases in type 1 and in 16 (88.9%) of 18 in type 2 with delayed contrast retention in 56 (84.8%) of 66 and in 17 (94.5%) of 18, respectively (P > 0.05). Autoimmune cholangitis was found in 29 (43.9%) of 66 patients with type 1 and in 3 (16.7%) of 18 with type 2 (P = 0.02); renal involvement was observed in 20 (30.3%) of 66 and 1 (5.5%) of 18, respectively (P = 0.02). Both subtypes presented with multiple stenoses (P > 0.05). Dilation of upstream duct was more frequent in type 1 (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging is useful in detecting extrapancreatic involvement, typically seen in type 1. Dilation of the upstream duct suggests type 1 AIP.

[Hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases in IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases]

BACKGROUND

IgG4-related diseases are rare systemic multiorgan diseases and can thus affect any organ system. The incidence of diagnosis has significantly increased due to increasing awareness.

OBJECTIVE

In the abdomen the hepatopancreaticobiliary system provides an essential organ system for the expression of IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases. The focus here is autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 but IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-associated hepatopathy, which can also occur in combination are less well-known.

METHODS

Various mostly Asiatic, histologically-based diagnostic systems, such as HISORt or international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) are available for the diagnostics of hepatopancreaticobiliary IgG4-related autoimmune diseases, in which imaging techniques playing an increasingly important role.

RESULTS

In addition to generalized organ swelling further morphological and also functional imaging criteria have become increasingly well-known for autoimmune pancreatitis, such as late enhancement or the imaging response to steroid therapy. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERP) can provide valuable information for the diagnostics of IgG4-related diseases in the hepatopancreaticobiliary system.

CONCLUSION

IgG4-related autoimmune diseases of the hepatopancreaticobiliary system are a rare group of diseases in which increasing knowledge of the radiological appearance also leads to an increasingly frequency of diagnosis. IgG4-related diseases must be distinguished from non-necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, which is often difficult but has significant therapeutic consequences for the patients.

Pancreatic Duct in Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Intraindividual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Pancreatography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to intraindividually compare magnetic resonance pancreatography (MRP) image quality at 1.5 T and 3.0 T when demonstrating main pancreatic duct (MPD) abnormalities in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

METHODS

Thirty prospectively enrolled patients with AIP underwent MRP at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T followed by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography before treatment. Two readers independently analyzed the MRP images and graded the visualization of MPD strictures and full-length MPD, using endoscopic retrograde pancreatography as the reference standard, as well as overall image artifacts on a 4-point scale. The contrast between the MPD and periductal area was calculated using a region-of-interest measurement.

RESULTS

Visualization scores of MPD strictures and full-length MPD, and summed scores of each qualitative analysis, were significantly greater at 3.0-T MRP than at 1.5-T MRP for both readers (P ≤ 0.02). There were less image artifacts at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T (P ≤ 0.052). The contrast between the MPD and periductal area was significantly greater at 3.0-T MRP than at 1.5-T MRP (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRP at 3.0 T was superior to 1.5-T MRP for demonstrating MPD abnormalities in AIP, with better image contrast and fewer image artifacts. Consequently, 3.0-T MRP may be useful for the diagnosis and management of patients with AIP.

Usefulness of three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with partial maximum intensity projection for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis

PURPOSE

To compare three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with/without partial maximum intensity projection (MIP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional MRCP and ERCP images were retrospectively analyzed in 24 patients with AIP. We evaluated the narrowing length of the main pancreatic duct (NR-MPD), multiple skipped MPD narrowing (SK-MPD), and side branches arising from the narrowed portion of the MPD (SB-MPD) using four MRCP datasets: 5 original images (MIP₅), 10 original images (MIP₁₀), all original images (full-MIP), and a combination of these three datasets (a-MIP). The images were scored using a 3- or 5-point scale. The scores of the four MRCP datasets were statistically analyzed, and the positive rate of each finding was compared between MRCP and ERCP.

RESULTS

The median scores for SB-MPD on MIP₅ and a-MIP were significantly higher than those on MIP₁₀ and full-MIP. In other words, partial MIP is superior to full-MIP for visualization of detailed structures. The positive rate for SB-MPD on full-MIP was significantly lower than that on ERCP, whereas the positive rate on MIP₅, MIP₁₀, and a-MIP was not significantly different from that on ERCP. Moreover, the positive rate for NR-MPD and SK-MPD on the MRCP images was significantly higher than that on the ERCP images.

CONCLUSION

Partial MIP is useful for evaluating the MPD and is comparable with ERCP for diagnosing AIP.

Pancreatic duct abnormalities in focal autoimmune pancreatitis: MR/MRCP imaging findings

AIM

To evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-MR cholangiopancreatographic (MRCP) findings of focal forms of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) to describe ductal involvement at diagnosis.

METHODS

MR examinations of 123 patients affected by AIP were analysed. We included 26 patients who satisfied International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria and were suffering from focal AIP. Image analysis included: site of parenchymal enlargement, main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter, MPD stenosis, stricture length, presence of upstream dilation within the stricture, signal intensity, and pancreatic enhancement.

RESULTS

Signal intensity abnormalities were localized in the head in 10/26 (38.5%) and in the body-tail in 16/26 (61.5%) patients. MRCP showed a single MPD stenosis in 12/26 (46.1%) and multiple MPD stenosis in 14/26 (53.8%) patients, without a dilation of the upstream MPD (mean: 3.83 mm). Lesions showed hypointensity on T1-weighted images in all patients, and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images in 22/26 (84.6%) patients. The affected parenchyma was hypovascular during the arterial phase in 25/26 (96.2%) patients with contrast retention.

CONCLUSIONS

MR-MRCP are effective techniques for the diagnosis of AIP showing the loss of the physiological lobulation and the typical contrastographic appearance. The presence of multiple, long stenoses without an upstream MPD dilation at MRCP suggests the diagnosis of AIP, and can be useful in differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

KEY POINTS

• MRI represents the gold standard in the diagnosis of AIP. • MRCP is an increasingly useful technique in the diagnosis of focal AIP. • MRCP could be a problem-solving tool in the differential diagnosis of AIP.

Immunoglobulin G4-related pancreatic and biliary diseases

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis and autoimmune cholangitis are new clinical entities that are now recognized as the pancreatico-biliary manifestations of immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-related disease.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize important clinical aspects of IgG4-related pancreatic and biliary diseases, and to review the role of IgG4 in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and autoimmune cholangitis (AIC).

METHODS

A narrative review was performed using the PubMed database and the following keywords: "IgG4", "IgG4 related disease", "autoimmune pancreatitis", "sclerosing cholangitis" and "autoimmune cholangitis". A total of 955 articles were retrieved; of these, 381 contained relevant data regarding the IgG4 molecule, pathogenesis of IgG-related diseases, and diagnosis, management and long-term follow-up for patients with AIP and AIC. Of these 381 articles, 66 of the most pertinent were selected.

RESULTS

The selected studies demonstrated the increasing clinical importance of both AIP and AIC, which can mimic pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, respectively. IgG4 titration in tissue or blood cannot be used alone to diagnose all IgG4-related diseases; however, it is often a useful adjunct to clinical, radiological and histological features. AIP and AIC respond to steroids; however, relapse is common and long-term maintenance treatment often required.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of the diagnosis and management of both AIC and AIP is timely and pertinent to clinical practice because the amount of information regarding these conditions has increased substantially in the past few years, resulting in significant impact on the clinical management of affected patients.

DWI findings of autoimmune pancreatitis: comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

PURPOSE

To compare the MR findings including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and to determine whether DWI can be used as an objective biomarker for symptomatic AIP, which is considered an indication for steroid therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board. MRI scans from 37 patients with AIP (symptomatic, n = 19; asymptomatic, n = 18) were retrospectively evaluated. The imaging studies were performed on a 1.5 Tesla scanner and assessed for parenchymal enlargement, narrowing of the main pancreatic duct, hypointensity on fat-suppressed T1-weighted images (FS-T1WI), a capsule-like rim, extrapancreatic lesions, and hyperintensity on DWI. The findings were compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were also calculated.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that hyperintensity on DWI were most significantly associated with the symptoms of AIP (odds ratio = 28.2; P = 0.003). Interobserver agreement for DWI was also high. The ADC values were significantly lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (0.94 ± 0.17 versus 1.16 ± 0.16 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the ADC values to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients showed that sensitivity was 68.4%, specificity 83.3%, and AUC 0.74.

CONCLUSION

Signal intensity on DWI and ADC value were well correlated with the active symptoms of AIP patients. DWI may be useful as an objective biomarker for determining the indication for steroid therapy.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: an illustrated guide to diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remains one of the rarer forms of pancreatitis but has become increasingly well recognized and widely diagnosed as it is an important differential, particularly due to the dramatic response to appropriate therapy. It is now best considered as part of a multisystem disease and the notion of "IgG4-related systemic sclerosing disease" has become widely recognized as the number of extra-pancreatic associations of AIP grows. More recently AIP has been classified into two subtypes: lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) with distinct geographical, age and sex distributions for the two subtypes, in addition to different pathological characteristics. The role of imaging is crucial in AIP and should be considered in conjunction with clinical, serological, and histopathological findings to make the diagnosis. Radiologists are uniquely placed to raise the possibility of AIP and aid the exclusion of significant differentials to allow the initiation of appropriate management and avoidance of unnecessary intervention. Radiological investigation may reveal a number of characteristic imaging findings in AIP but appearances can vary considerably and the focal form of AIP may appear as a pancreatic mass, imitating pancreatic carcinoma. This review will illustrate typical and atypical appearances of AIP on all imaging modes. Emphasis will be placed on the imaging features that are likely to prove useful in discriminating AIP from other causes prior to histopathological confirmation. In addition, examples of relevant differential diagnoses are discussed and illustrated.

Strategy to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreas cancer

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a newly described entity of pancreatitis in which the pathogenesis appears to involve autoimmune mechanisms. Based on histological and immunohistochemical examinations of various organs of AIP patients, AIP appears to be a pancreatic lesion reflecting a systemic “IgG4-related sclerosing disease”. Clinically, AIP patients and patients with pancreatic cancer share many features, such as preponderance of elderly males, frequent initial symptom of painless jaundice, development of new-onset diabetes mellitus, and elevated levels of serum tumor markers. It is of uppermost importance not to misdiagnose AIP as pancreatic cancer. Since there is currently no diagnostic serological marker for AIP, and approach to the pancreas for histological examination is generally difficult, AIP is diagnosed using a combination of clinical, serological, morphological, and histopathological features. Findings suggesting AIP rather than pancreatic cancer include: fluctuating obstructive jaundice; elevated serum IgG4 levels; diffuse enlargement of the pancreas; delayed enhancement of the enlarged pancreas and presence of a capsule-like rim on dynamic computed tomography; low apparent diffusion coefficient values on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance image; irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; less upstream dilatation of the main pancreatic duct on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, presence of other organ involvement such as bilateral salivary gland swelling, retroperitoneal fibrosis and hilar or intrahepatic sclerosing cholangitis; negative work-up for malignancy including endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; and steroid responsiveness. Since AIP responds dramatically to steroid therapy, accurate diagnosis of AIP can avoid unnecessary laparotomy or pancreatic resection.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune pancreatitis

• AIP is a heterogeneous disease with two distinct subtypes, now called type 1 and type 2. The proportions of these subtypes vary in their distribution worldwide. • Pancreatic cancer is the leading differential diagnosis for AIP, although AIP can mimic any other major pancreatobiliary disease. • Cross-sectional abdominal imaging CT/MRI should form the cornerstone to the diagnosis of AIP. • Serum IgG4 provides collateral evidence for the diagnosis of AIP and should not be the sole basis for the diagnosis. False-positive elevation in serum IgG4 can be seen in up to 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer. • A steroid trial should be performed only in select situations after ruling out pancreatic cancer and by gastroenterologists experienced in treating AIP. • Disease recurrence can be seen in up to 40% of patients after initial steroid therapy.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of the mass-forming type of autoimmune pancreatitis: comparison with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine the characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), which allow its differentiation from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR images of 37 patients with either pathologically proven, mass-forming AIPs (n = 9) or PACs (n = 28) were retrospectively reviewed. The pancreatic MR protocol included unenhanced images, contrast-enhanced dynamic images, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and MR-cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Two reviewers analyzed the MR images regarding the number, location, morphologic features, and enhancement degree and pattern of the lesions as well as secondary changes of the pancreatic parenchyma, the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the lesions were measured.

RESULTS

Although sensitivities were low (28.6%-44.4%), specificities of multiplicity, capsule-like rim enhancement, and skipped stricture of the biliary or pancreatic duct in mass-forming AIP were high (100%). Sensitivities and specificities of irregular or geographic shape, delayed enhancement, and a low ADC value <1.26 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s in mass-forming AIP were favorable (71.4%-83.3% and 78.5%-89.3%).

CONCLUSION

Although to differentiate mass-forming AIP from pancreatic cancer is difficult, the combination of MRI findings including contrast-enhanced dynamic images, MRCP, and DWI can be a help.

IgG4-related sclerosing disease: autoimmune pancreatitis and extrapancreatic manifestations

Autoimmune pancreatitis is the pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related sclerosing disease, which recently was recognized as a distinct disease entity. Numerous extrapancreatic organs, such as the bile ducts, gallbladder, kidneys, retroperitoneum, thyroid, salivary glands, lung, mediastinum, lymph nodes, and prostate may be involved, either synchronously or metachronously. Most cases of autoimmune pancreatitis are associated with elevated serum IgG4 levels; extensive IgG4-positive plasma cells; and infiltration of lymphocytes into various organs, which leads to fibrosis. There are several established diagnostic criteria systems that are used to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis and that rely on a combination of imaging findings of the pancreas and other organs, serologic findings, pancreatic histologic findings, and response to corticosteroid therapy. It is important to recognize multiorgan involvement of IgG4-related sclerosing disease and be familiar with its clinical and imaging features because it demonstrates a favorable response to treatment.

Mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma: differential diagnosis on the basis of computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and diffusion-weighted imaging findings

PURPOSE

To differentiate mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic carcinoma by means of analysis of both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with mass-forming AIP diagnosed by revised clinical criteria of Japan Pancreas Society and 70 patients with pathologically proven pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently evaluated the CT and MR imaging findings. The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio of significant imaging findings and combinations of findings were calculated.

RESULTS

Seven findings were more frequently observed in AIP patients: (i) early homogeneous good enhancement, (ii) delayed homogeneous good enhancement, (iii) hypoattenuating capsule-like rim, (iv) absence of distal pancreatic atrophy, (v5) duct penetrating sign, (vi) main pancreatic duct (MPD) upstream dilatation ≤ 4 mm, and (vii) an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ≤ 0.88 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s. When the findings of delayed homogeneous enhancement and ADC ≤ 0.88 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s were both used in diagnosis of mass-forming AIP, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100% were achieved. When 4 of any of the 7 findings were used in the diagnosis of AIP, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98% were achieved.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of a combination of CT and MR imaging findings allows for highly accurate differentiation between mass-forming AIP and pancreatic carcinoma.

Morphologic patterns of autoimmune pancreatitis in CT and MRI

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To retrospectively evaluate the morphologic characteristics of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) using MRI and CT.

METHODS

86 dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI scans in 36 AIP patients were evaluated regarding: different enlargement types, abnormalities of the main pancreatic duct (MPD), morphology of the parenchyma and other associated findings.

RESULTS

3 types of enlargement were found: (1) a focal type (28%), (2) a diffuse type (involving the entire pancreas, 11%) and (3) a combined type (56%). The MPD was usually dilated together with focal or diffuse narrowing in 67% (24/36). Unenhanced MRI showed AIP area in 56% (mostly T(1) hypo- and T(2) hyperattenuating), and CT in 10% (hypoattenuating). The arterial phase depicted similar patterns for CT and MRI (hypoattenuating in 58 and 52%, respectively). Venous and late venous phase patterns were usually hyperattenuating in MRI (65 and 74%, late enhancement), while CT mostly showed no signal differences (isoattenuating in 57 and 75%), yielding significant differences between CT and MRI for the venous (p < 0.0001) and the late phase (p = 0.025). Miscellaneous findings were: rim sign (25%), pseudocysts (8%) and infiltration of large vessels (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 'late-enhancement' sign seems to be a key feature and is best detectable with MRI. MRI may be recommended in the diagnostic workup of AIP patients. and IAP.

Autoimmune pancreatitis complicated by carcinoma of the pancreatobiliary system: a case report and review of the literature

We present the case of a 67-year-old woman who developed a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreatobiliary system shortly after the histologically confirmed diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). This case highlights the need for increased alertness not only in differentiating AIP from pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis, but also to exclude concomitant malignancies of the pancreatobiliary system in the management of histologically confirmed AIP.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnostic evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the accuracy of MRCP in depicting the main pancreatic duct (MPD) morphology of AIP using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the reference standard.

METHODS

Thirty-eight AIP patients, 40 pancreatic cancer patients, and 40 patients with normal pancreas were included. MRCP was interpreted in association with cross-sectional magnetic resonance images regarding MPD morphology, pancreatic parenchyma, and extrapancreatic abnormalities. Main pancreatic duct was interpreted as narrowed when a narrowed-appearing segment on MRCP was associated with upstream dilatation or pancreatic parenchymal abnormalities in the same location.

RESULTS

Accuracy of MRCP for depicting MPD morphology of AIP (64.7% [22/34]) was lower than those for pancreatic cancer (88.5% [23/26]) (P = 0.041) or normal pancreas (100% [40/40]) (P < 0.0005). The inaccuracy in AIP was primarily (10/12) due to overestimation of MPD narrowing. Of various differing MRCP findings between AIP and pancreatic cancer, multiple MPD narrowing (AIP vs cancer, 27/38 vs 0/40) and upstream MPD dilatation greater than 5 mm in diameter (AIP vs cancer, 0/38 vs 10/40) could exclude pancreatic cancer and AIP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRCP cannot replace ERCP for the diagnostic evaluation of AIP but may deserve to be used when ERCP has been unsuccessful or is difficult to perform.

Autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing disease

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a unique form of pancreatitis in which the pathogenesis is suspected to involve autoimmune mechanisms. AIP sometimes mimics pancreatic cancer in its presentation, but as AIP responds dramatically to steroid therapy, accurate diagnosis is necessary. AIP is currently diagnosed on the basis of a combination of characteristic clinical, serological, morphological and histopathological features. However, its diagnosis remains a clinical challenge and there are no internationally agreed diagnostic criteria. Another type of AIP called 'idiopathic duct-centric chronic pancreatitis' or 'AIP with granulocytic epithelial lesion' has been reported in Western countries. IgG4-related sclerosing disease is a systemic disease in which IgG4-positive plasma cells and T lymphocytes extensively infiltrate various organs. Organs with tissue fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis, such as the pancreas, salivary gland and retroperitoneum, show clinical manifestations; AIP seems to represent one manifestation of IgG4-related sclerosing disease. As a mass is formed in most cases of IgG4-related sclerosing disease, a malignant tumor is frequently suspected on initial presentation. Clinicians should consider IgG4-related sclerosing disease in the differential diagnosis to avoid unnecessary surgery.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: imaging findings on contrast-enhanced MR, MRCP and dynamic secretin-enhanced MRCP

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively determined magnetic resonance (MR), MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and secretin-MRCP findings in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MR examinations of 28 patients with histopathologically proven AIP were reviewed. In 14 cases, secretin-enhanced MRCP was performed. The observers evaluated pancreatic parenchymal enlargement, signal intensity abnormalities, enhancement, vascular involvement, bile-duct diameter and main pancreatic duct (MPD) narrowing (diffuse/focal/segmental). After secretin administration, the presence of the "duct-penetrating" sign was evaluated.

RESULTS

MR imaging showed diffuse pancreatic enlargement in 8/28(29%) cases, focal pancreatic enlargement in 16/28 (57%) cases and no enlargement in 4/28 (14%) cases. The alteration of pancreatic signal intensity was diffuse in 8/28 (29%) cases (eight diffuse AIP) and focal in 20/28 (71%) cases (20 focal AIP). Delayed pancreatic enhancement was present in all AIP, with peripheral rim of enhancement in 8/28 (29%) AIP (1/8 diffuse, 7/20 focal); vascular encasement was present in 7/28 (25%) AIP (1/8 diffuse, 6/20 focal); distal common bile duct narrowing was present in 12/28(43%) AIP (5/8 diffuse, 7/20 focal). MRCP showed MPD narrowing in 17/28 (61%) AIP (4/8 diffuse, 15/20 focal), MPD dilation in 8/28(29%) AIP (3/8 diffuse, 5/20 focal) and normal MPD in 1/8 diffuse AIP. Secretin-MRCP showed the duct-penetrating sign in 6/14(43%) AIP (one diffuse AIP with MPD segmental narrowing, five focal AIP with MPD focal narrowing), demonstrating integrity of the MPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed enhancement and MPD stenosis are suggestive for AIP on MR and MRCP imaging. Secretin-enhanced MRCP is a problem-solving tool in the differential diagnosis between focal AIP and ductal adenocarcinoma.

Can MRCP replace ERCP for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis?

BACKGROUND

It is of utmost importance that autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) be differentiated from pancreatic cancer. Irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct is a characteristic finding in AIP; it is useful for differentiating AIP from pancreatic cancer stenosis. This study evaluated the usefulness of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the diagnosis of AIP and assessed whether MRCP could replace endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosing AIP.

METHODS

The MRCP and ERCP findings of 20 AIP patients were compared.

RESULTS

On MRCP, the narrowed portion of the main pancreatic duct was not visualized, while the noninvolved segments of the pancreatic duct were visualized. The degree of upstream dilatation of the proximal main pancreatic duct was milder in AIP than in pancreatic cancer patients. In the skipped type, only skipped narrowed lesions were not visualized. After steroid therapy for AIP, the nonvisualized main pancreatic duct became visualized.

CONCLUSIONS

MRCP cannot replace ERCP for the diagnosis of AIP, since narrowing of the main pancreatic duct in AIP was not visualized on MRCP. MRCP findings of segmental or skipped nonvisualized main pancreatic duct accompanied by a less dilated upstream main pancreatic duct may suggest the presence of AIP. MRCP is useful for following AIP patients.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: an update

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic fibroinflammatory disorder. It has been recognized as a distinct clinical entity, only recently. Multiple organs, such bile ducts, salivary glands, kidneys and lymph nodes, can be involved either synchronously or metachronously. It is one of the few autoimmune conditions that predominantly affects male subjects in the fifth and sixth decades of life. Obstructive jaundice is the most common presenting symptom but the presentation can be quite nonspecific. There are established diagnostic criteria to diagnose AIP, most of which rely on a combination of clinical presentation, imaging of the pancreas and other organs (by CT scan, MRI and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography), serology, pancreatic histology and response to steroids to make the diagnosis. It is imperative to differentiate AIP from pancreatic cancer owing to the vastly different prognostic and therapeutic implications. AIP responds dramatically to steroid treatment but relapses are common. Relapse of AIP can often be retreated with steroids. As the collective experience with this condition increases, a better understanding of the natural history of this disease is emerging.

Asian diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: consensus of the Japan-Korea Symposium on Autoimmune Pancreatitis

In 2002, the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) was the first in the world to propose diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Since the concept of AIP has changed with the accumulation of AIP cases, the Research Committee of Intractable Pancreatic Diseases (RCIPD) provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and the JPS issued revised clinical diagnostic criteria of AIP in 2006. The Asan Medical Center of Korea also proposed diagnostic criteria for AIP in 2006. However, there are subtle but clinically challenging differences between the Japanese and Korean criteria. This inconsistency makes it difficult to compare data in studies from different centers and elucidate the characteristics of AIP. To reach a consensus on AIP, the RCIPD and the Korean Society of Pancreatobiliary Diseases established the following Asian criteria for the diagnosis of AIP: I-1. Imaging studies of pancreatic parenchyma show a diffuse/segmental/focally enlarged gland, occasionally with a mass and/or a hypoattenuation rim. I-2. Imaging studies of pancreaticobiliary ducts show diffuse/segmental/focal pancreatic ductal narrowing, often with stenosis of the bile duct. (Both I-1 and I-2 are required for diagnosis). II. Elevated level of serum IgG or IgG4, and detection of autoantibodies. III. Common lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and fibrosis, with abundant IgG4-positive cell infiltration. AIP should be diagnosed when criterion I and one of the other two criteria are satisfied, or when histology shows the presence of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis in the resected pancreas. A diagnostic trial of steroid therapy can be applied carefully by expert pancreatologists only in patients fulfilling criterion I alone with negative diagnostic work-up results for pancreatobiliary cancer.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: an adolescent case and review of literature

We present a case of a 16-year-old adolescent boy with autoimmune pancreatitis and a review of the related literature. The patient was sent from a peripheral medical center, presenting with jaundice, pruritus, weight loss, and hyperglycemia of 20 days' duration. At admission, the patient was icteric, choluric, and acholic. His abdomen was soft and nontender, and the patient felt no pain in his abdomen. He had skin lesions because of scratching. Laboratory findings showed a blood glucose level of 135 mg%; total serum bilirubin, 29.4 mg%; direct bilirubin, 23 mg%; and alkaline phosphatase, 1100 IU/L. Abdominal ultrasound showed an enlarged head of the pancreas that was 30 x 35 mm. The parenchyma was slightly heterogeneous. Abdominal computed tomography showed an enlarged head of the pancreas with a normal body and tail, thickened duodenal wall, and dilated intra- and extrahepatic biliary tract, and the distal choledochus was not visible. Magnetic resonance imaging showed dilated intra- and extrahepatic biliary tract. The choledochus was not visible, and the cystic duct ended abruptly. The pancreas head was enlarged and homogenous, and there were no changes with contrast. Wirsung's duct was not dilated. Laparotomy was performed with a presumed diagnosis of pancreatic head tumor. The pancreas was diffusely indurated and enlarged; biopsy and intraoperative cholangiography were performed. The biliary tract was dilated with no duodenal passage of contrast, and the Wirsung's duct was not observed. Cholecystectomy was performed, and a transcystic drain was positioned. The histopathology was compatible with autoimmune pancreatitis. Prednisone treatment was started with good response. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a very rare entity among children and adolescents. It should be suspected when characteristic clinical signs and radiographic images are associated with a higher level of IgG4. Autoimmune pancreatitis is confirmed by biopsy. Treatment with prednisone often alleviates all the symptoms, as what happened in this case.

Autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis is the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic disorder that affects various organs, including the bile duct, retroperitoneum, kidney, and parotid and lacrimal glands. It represents a recently described subset of chronic pancreatitis that is immune mediated and has unique histologic, morphologic, and clinical characteristics. A hallmark of the disease is its rapid response to corticosteroid treatment. Although still a rare disease, autoimmune pancreatitis is increasingly becoming recognized clinically, leading to evolution in the understanding of its prognosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic fibroinflammatory disease (IgG4-related systemic disease) in which affected organs demonstrate dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration with abundant IgG4-positive cells. The diagnosis of AIP and its differentiation from pancreatic cancer, its main differential diagnosis, remains a clinical challenge. The five cardinal features of AIP are characteristic histology, imaging, and serology; other organ involvement; and response to steroid therapy. Recent advances in our understanding of these features have resulted in enhanced recognition and diagnosis of this benign disease. This in turn has resulted in the avoidance of unnecessary surgical procedures for suspected malignancy. This article reviews recent updates in the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (autoimmune pancreatitis): evaluation with multidetector CT

Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis is a form of chronic pancreatitis characterized by a mixed inflammatory infiltrate that centers on the pancreatic ducts. It is a cause of benign pancreatic disease that can clinically mimic pancreatic cancer. Preoperative detection of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis is important because patients usually respond to steroid therapy. Patients with lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis are often referred for computed tomography (CT) when they are suspected of having a pancreatic or biliary neoplasm; therefore, it is important to search for potential findings suggestive of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis when typical findings of a pancreatic or biliary neoplasm are not found. Typical CT findings include diffuse or focal enlargement of the pancreas without dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. Focal enlargement is most commonly seen in the head of the pancreas, and the involved pancreas on contrast material-enhanced CT images may be iso-attenuating relative to the rest of the pancreas, or hypo-attenuating, especially during the early postcontrast phase. Thickening and contrast enhancement of the wall of the common bile duct and gallbladder may reflect inflammatory infiltrate and fibrosis associated with lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis. There are several features seen at CT that may help to differentiate lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer, such as diffuse enlargement of the pancreas with minimal peripancreatic stranding in patients with obstructive jaundice, an absence of significant pancreatic atrophy, and an absence of significant main pancreatic duct dilatation. When these findings are encountered, clinical, other imaging, and serologic data should be evaluated.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune pancreatitis: Experience from China

AIM: To determine the clinical, radiographic and pathologic characteristics, diagnostic and treatment modalities in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

METHODS: In this retrospective study, the data of patients with diagnosed chronic pancreatitis (CP) between 1995 and 2006 in Chinese PLA General Hospital were included to screen for the cases with AIP, according to the following diagnostic criteria: (1) diagnostic histopathologic features, and abound IgG4-positive plasma cells on pancreatic tissues; (2) characteristic imaging on computed tomography and pancreatography, together with increased serum IgG, γ-globulin levels or presence of autoantibodies; (3) response to steroid therapy. The clinical, radiographic and pathologic characteristics, diagnostic and treatment modalities, and outcome of AIP cases were reviewed.

RESULTS: Twenty-five (22 male, 3 female; mean age 54 years, 36-76 years) out of 510 CP patients were diagnosed as AIP, which accounted for 49% (21/43) of CP population undergoing surgical treatment in the same period. The main clinical manifestations included intermittent or progressive jaundice in 18 cases (72%), abdominal pain in 11 (44%), weight loss in 10 (40%), and 3 cases had no symptoms. The imaging features consisted of pancreatic enlargement, especially in the head of pancreas (18 cases), strictures of main pancreatic duct and intrapancreatic bile duct. Massive lymphocytes and plasma cells infiltration in pancreatic tissues were showed on pathology, as well as parenchymal fibrosis. Twenty-three patients were misdiagnosed as pancreaticobiliary malignancy, and 21 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy, the remaining 4 patients dramatically responded to steroid therapy. No pancreatic cancer occurred during a mean 46-mo follow-up period.

CONCLUSION: AIP patients always are subjected to mistaken diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and an unnecessary surgical exploration, due to its similarity in clinical features with pancreatic cancer. The differential diagnosis with high index of suspicion of AIP would improve the diagnostic accuracy for AIP.

Serum Immunoglobulin G Fraction 4 Levels in Pancreatic Cancer: Elevations Not Associated With Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Context.—Autoimmune pancreatitis is an uncommon, inflammatory disease of the pancreas that presents with clinical features, such as painless jaundice and a pancreatic mass, similar to those caused by pancreatic cancer. Patients with autoimmune pancreatitis frequently have elevated serum immunoglobulin G fraction 4 (IgG4) levels, and their pancreatic tissue may show IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration. It is imperative to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer because autoimmune pancreatitis typically responds to corticosteroid treatment. A previous Japanese study reported that serum IgG4 greater than 135 mg/dL was 97% specific and 95% sensitive in predicting autoimmune pancreatitis.

Objective.—To prospectively measure serum IgG4 levels in pancreatic cancer patients to ascertain whether increased levels might be present in this North American population.

Design.—We collected blood samples and phenotypic information on 71 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients and 103 healthy controls who visited our clinics between October 2004 and April 2006. IgG4 levels were determined using a single radial immunodiffusion assay. A serum IgG4 level greater than 135 mg/dL was considered elevated.

Results.—Five cancer patients had IgG4 elevation, with a mean serum IgG4 level of 160.8 mg/dL. None of our cancer patients with plasma IgG4 elevation demonstrated evidence of autoimmune pancreatitis. One control subject demonstrated elevated serum IgG4 unrelated to identified etiology.

Conclusions.—As many as 7% of patients with pancreatic cancer have serum IgG4 levels above 135 mg/dL. In patients with pancreatic mass lesions and suspicion of cancer, an IgG4 level measuring between 135 and 200 mg/dL should be interpreted cautiously and not accepted as diagnostic of autoimmune pancreatitis without further evaluation.

Incidence of the focal type of autoimmune pancreatitis in chronic pancreatitis suspected to be pancreatic carcinoma: experience of a single tertiary cancer center

OBJECTIVE

With an increase in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) being reported, the focal type of AIP, which shows localized narrowing of the main pancreatic duct and focal swelling of the pancreas, has recently been recognized. Therefore, cases of focal-type AIP subjected to surgical intervention for presumptive malignancy might previously have been diagnosed as mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence of focal-type AIP in resected chronic pancreatitis at a single tertiary cancer center. The clinical and radiological features of focal-type AIP were also evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We re-evaluated 15 patients who underwent pancreatic resection with a presumed diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and who in the past had been diagnosed pathologically as having chronic pancreatitis.

RESULTS

Seven of 15 patients showed AIP, and the other 8 patients were diagnosed as having mass-forming chronic pancreatitis not otherwise specified by pathological retrospective examination. In other words, nearly half of the cases of resected chronic pancreatitis that were suspected to be pancreatic carcinoma preoperatively showed focal-type AIP. Regarding the characteristic findings of focal-type AIP, narrowing of the pancreatic duct on endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) might be diagnostic.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal-type AIP is not a rare clinical entity and might be buried in previously resected pancreatic specimens that in the past were diagnosed simply as mass-forming pancreatitis.

Autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a benign, IgG4-related, fibroinflammatory form of chronic pancreatitis that can mimic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma both clinically and radiographically. Laboratory studies typically demonstrate elevated serum IgG4 levels and imaging studies reveal a diffusely or focally enlarged pancreas with associated diffuse or focal narrowing of the pancreatic duct. The pathologic features include periductal lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, obliterative phlebitis, and abundant IgG4-positive plasma cells. The treatment of choice for AIP is steroid therapy. Diagnostic criteria for AIP have been proposed that incorporate histologic, radiographic, serologic, and clinical information.

Management of severe acute pancreatitis: it's all about timing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study provides an update on the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with emphasis on nutrition, infection-prophylaxis, biliary pancreatitis, surgical intervention and new randomized controlled trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most relevant new insights are: (i) early enteral nutrition in SAP is not only capable of reducing infectious complications but may also reduce mortality; (ii) there is increasing evidence that antibiotic-prophylaxis is not capable of preventing infectious complications in SAP; (iii) probiotic-prophylaxis is being considered as an alternative with promising experimental results; (iv) in biliary pancreatitis, early endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy (within 48 h) is beneficial in case of ampullary obstruction, although it may be withheld in the event of negative endoscopic ultrasound; (v) surgical intervention for infected (peri-)pancreatic necrosis is increasingly being postponed; (vi) minimally invasive strategies are being considered as a full alternative for necrosectomy by laparotomy in infected (peri-)pancreatic necrosis; (vii) the Atlanta classification should no longer be used to describe computed tomography findings in acute pancreatitis; and (viii) only five randomized controlled trials of patients with acute pancreatitis are currently registered in the international trial registries.

SUMMARY

Timing of intervention is becoming increasingly important in SAP management.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: proposal of IgG4-related sclerosing disease

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a peculiar type of pancreatitis of presumed autoimmune etiology. Many new clinical aspects of AIP have been clarified during the past 10 years, and AIP has become a distinct entity recognized worldwide. However, its precise pathogenesis or pathophysiology remains unclear. As AIP dramatically responds to steroid therapy, accurate diagnosis of AIP is necessary to avoid unnecessary surgery. Characteristic dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and fibrosis in the pancreas may prove to be the gold standard for diagnosis of AIP. However, since it is difficult to obtain sufficient pancreatic tissue, AIP should be diagnosed currently based on the characteristic radiological findings (irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct and enlargement of the pancreas) in combination with serological findings (elevation of serum gamma-globulin, IgG, or IgG4, along with the presence of autoantibodies), clinical findings (elderly male preponderance, fluctuating obstructive jaundice without pain, occasional extrapancreatic lesions, and favorable response to steroid therapy), and histopathological findings (dense infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells and T lymphocytes with fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis in various organs). It is apparent that elevation of serum IgG4 levels and infiltration of abundant IgG4-positive plasma cells into various organs are rather specific to AIP patients. We propose a new clinicopathological entity, "IgG4-related sclerosing disease", and suggest that AIP is a pancreatic lesion reflecting this systemic disease.

Autoimmune pancreatitis metachronously associated with retroperitoneal fibrosis with IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration

Retroperitoneal fibrosis is an uncommon disorder characterized by the formation of a dense plaque of fibrous tissue in the retroperitoneum, and its etiology remains unknown. Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare type of chronic pancreatitis characterized by fibrosis with abundant infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells and lymphocytes and obliterative phlebitis in the pancreas. We present a case of autoimmune pancreatitis that developed 10 mo after the occurrence of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Histological findings of the resected retroperitoneal mass were marked periureteral fibrosis with abundant infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells and lymphocytes and obliterative phlebitis. These findings suggest a common pathophysiological mechanism for retroperitoneal fibrosis and autoimmune pancreatitis in this case. Some cases of retroperitoneal fibrosis might be a retroperitoneal lesion of IgG4-related sclerosing disease.