Phase II study of protracted irinotecan infusion and a low-dose cisplatin for metastatic gastric cancer

Assessment of low-dose cisplatin as a model of nausea and emesis in beagle dogs, potential for repeated administration

Cisplatin is a highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy agent, which is often used to induce nausea and emesis in animal models. The cytotoxic properties of cisplatin also cause adverse events that negatively impact on animal welfare preventing repeated administration of cisplatin. In this study, we assessed whether a low (subclinical) dose of cisplatin could be utilized as a model of nausea and emesis in the dog while decreasing the severity of adverse events to allow repeated administration. The emetic, nausea-like behavior and potential biomarker response to both the clinical dose (70 mg/m²) and low dose (15 mg/m²) of cisplatin was assessed. Plasma creatinine concentrations and granulocyte counts were used to assess adverse effects on the kidneys and bone marrow, respectively. Nausea-like behavior and emesis was induced by both doses of cisplatin, but the latency to onset was greater in the low-dose group. No significant change in plasma creatinine was detected for either dose groups. Granulocytes were significantly reduced compared with baseline (P = 0.000) following the clinical, but not the low-dose cisplatin group. Tolerability of repeated administration was assessed with 4 administrations of an 18 mg/m² dose cisplatin. Plasma creatinine did not change significantly. Cumulative effects on the granulocytes occurred, they were significantly decreased (P = 0.03) from baseline at 3 weeks following cisplatin for the 4th administration only. Our results suggest that subclinical doses (15 and 18 mg/m²) of cisplatin induce nausea-like behavior and emesis but have reduced adverse effects compared with the clinical dose allowing for repeated administration in crossover studies.

Drug ratio-dependent antitumor activity of irinotecan and cisplatin combinations in vitro and in vivo

Irinotecan and cisplatin are two established anticancer drugs, which together constitute an effective combination for treating small-cell lung cancer. We investigated whether the efficacy of this combination could be improved by controlling drug ratios following in vivo administration. Irinotecan and cisplatin combinations were evaluated systematically for drug ratio-dependent synergy in vitro using a panel of 20 tumor cell lines. In vitro screening informatics on drug ratio-dependent cytotoxicity identified a consistently antagonistic region between irinotecan/cisplatin molar ratios of 1:2 to 4:1, which was bordered by two synergistic regions. Liposomal co-formulations of these two agents were developed that exhibited plasma drug half-lives of approximately 6 hours and maintained a fixed drug ratio for more than 24 hours. Drug ratio-dependent antitumor activity was shown in vivo for these liposome formulations, and irinotecan/cisplatin ratios between 5:1 and 10:1 were identified as therapeutically optimal. The relationship between irinotecan/cisplatin ratio and in vivo efficacy was consistent with in vitro drug ratio dependency results. Superior antitumor activity was observed for the liposome-encapsulated 7:1 molar ratio of irinotecan/cisplatin (designated CPX-571) compared with the free-drug cocktail in all models tested. Further efficacy studies in a range of human tumor xenografts, including an irinotecan-resistant model, showed that both liposomal agents contributed to the overall efficacy in a manner consistent with in vivo synergy. These results show the ability of drug delivery technology to enhance the therapeutic activity of irinotecan/cisplatin combination treatment by maintaining synergistic ratios in vivo. CPX-571, a fixed-ratio formulation of irinotecan and cisplatin, is a promising candidate for clinical development.

Chinese reports on the effect and safety of systemic chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

AIM: To study the effect and safety of systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

METHODS: Articles on systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer published in 2002 to 2006 were retrieved using the key word "Gastric Cancer" with the secondary retrieval key word "Treatment" or "Chemotherapy" from "Vip Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals database", then the whole text was read to get all-related information. The data were descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS: There were 274 articles on systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer, 156 of which were on oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, capecitabine and irinotecan. Among the 134 articles statistically studied, randomized controlled test was reported in 31, median survival time in 53, and median time of tumor progress in 30, respectively. The response rate of FOLFOX4, FOLFOX6, and other oxaliplatin-related regimens was 21.21%-56.00%, 38.78%-61.29%, and 34.09%-66.67%, respectively. The response rate of paclitaxel-, docetaxel- and capecitabine-related regimens was 23.53%-75.00%, 20.00%-66.67%, and 29.17%-71.88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Drugs and regimens used for gastric cancer are in agreement with the those reported abroad. However, there are certain shortcomings in the design of domestic clinical studies, thus affecting the results of studies.

UGT1A1 promoter genotype correlates with SN-38 pharmacokinetics, but not severe toxicity in patients receiving low-dose irinotecan

PURPOSE

To study the association between UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) genotypes and severe toxicity as well as irinotecan disposition in pediatric patients with solid tumors receiving low-dose, protracted irinotecan (15 to 75 mg/m2 daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-four patients on five institutional clinical trials received irinotecan (15 to 75 mg/m2) daily intravenously or orally for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks. Genomic DNA was genotyped for UGT1A1*28, and patients were designated as 6/6, 6/7, or 7/7 depending on the number of TA repeats in the UGT1A1 promoter region. Patients were evaluated for gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity, as well as baseline and maximal serum bilirubin levels. Toxicity and pharmacokinetic results were evaluated during courses 1 and 2 of irinotecan therapy.

RESULTS

The frequencies of 6/6, 6/7, and 7/7 genotypes were 27 (36.5%), 36 (48.6%), and 9 (12.2%) of 74 patients, respectively. Patients with 7/7 genotype had a statistically greater baseline total bilirubin than patients with 6/6 or 6/7 genotype (P = .005). UGT1A1*28 genotype was not associated with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (P = .21 for course 1; P = .23 for course 2) or diarrhea (P = .176 for course 1; P = .87 for course 2). However, patients with the 7/7 genotype tended to have higher SN-38 area under the plasma time-concentration curve (AUC) values and lower SN-38G/SN-38 AUC ratios.

CONCLUSION

Severe toxicity was not increased in pediatric patients with the 7/7 genotype when treated with a low-dose protracted schedule of irinotecan. Therefore, UGT1A1 genotyping is not a useful prognostic indicator of severe toxicity for patients treated with this irinotecan dosage and schedule.