Specific endoscopic features of ulcerative colitis complicated by cytomegalovirus infection

Iron deficiency anemia: an early clinical presentation of cytomegalovirus-induced hemorrhagic colitis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients under dasatinib treatment

Dasatinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor employed for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment that achieves high rates of prolonged and complete molecular responses (MR). Among the adverse effects reported, it has been associated with hemorrhagic complications, mainly due to its inhibiting effects on platelet functions. In addition, immune alterations induced by dasatinib may elevate the risk of bleeding and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract, thus contributing to the development of hemorrhagic colitis. In this case report, we highlight three cases of CML receiving treatment with dasatinib where CMV hemorrhagic colitis occurred. All of them exhibited iron deficiency anemia as a premature clinical manifestation in the absence of intestinal symptoms, unlike cases previously reported in the literature. CMV infection was confirmed with stool samples or tissue quantitative polymerase chain reaction and/or immunohistochemistry staining in colon biopsies. All three cases could be managed with valganciclovir and iron supplements in an outpatient setting. Management strategies of dasatinib during and after CMV infection varied, as they are not yet established and need to be individualized based on the gravity of symptoms and disease state. Iron deficiency anemia during dasatinib treatment should raise suspicion for the potential presence of CMV colitis, prompting endoscopic studies to rule out this complication, even if intestinal symptoms are not present.

Cytomegalovirus in Ulcerative Colitis: An Unwanted "Guest"

The role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in the flare-up of ulcerative colitis (UC) is not clearly understood. CMV can cause similar symptoms in different clinical contexts, which may be attributed to the natural evolution of the viral infection, the patient's immune status, or its association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aims to delineate the diverse manifestations of CMV-related lesions from clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological perspectives, alongside a brief narrative review of the literature. In managing IBD patients, it is crucial to be vigilant for signs of CMV reactivation, especially before the initiation of more intensive therapies.

Two Cases of Cytomegalovirus Colitis During the Treatment of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Colitis

Herein, we outlined two case reports of patients who developed cytomegalovirus colitis following the initiation of corticosteroid therapy for colitis as a result of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). For both patients, endoscopic findings were similar to those observed for patients with irAE colitis but were devoid of the characteristic features associated with cytomegalovirus colitis, including punched-out ulcers. Given the therapeutic disparities between these two conditions, it is imperative to distinguish between these conditions in clinical practice. When addressing exacerbations or refractory manifestations of irAE-associated colitis, clinicians should remain vigilant with regard to the potential for cytomegalovirus infection, even in the absence of punched-out ulcers in the colorectum.

Diagnostic Utility of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA Quantitation in Ulcerative Colitis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis is a critical condition associated with severe complications in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the presence of CMV DNA in intestinal mucosa tissue and blood samples in patients with active UC. This study included 81 patients with exacerbated symptoms of UC. Patient data were obtained from the Hospital Information Management System. CMV DNA in colorectal tissue and plasma samples were analyzed using a real-time quantitative PCR assay. CMV markers were detected using immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin-eosin staining. Immunohistochemistry positivity was observed in tissue samples from eight (9.9%) patients. Only one (1.2%) patient showed CMV-specific intranuclear inclusion bodies. CMV DNA was detected in 63.0% of the tissues (median: 113 copies/mg) and in 58.5% of the plasma samples (median: 102 copies/mL). For tissues, sensitivity and the negative predictive value (NPV) for qPCR were excellent (100.0%), whereas specificity and the positive predictive value (PPV) were low (41.9% and 15.7%, respectively). For plasma, sensitivity and NPV were high (100.0%) for qPCR, whereas specificity and PPV were low (48.6% and 24.0%, respectively). CMV DNA ≥392 copies/mg in tissue samples (sensitivity 100.0% and specificity 83.6%) and ≥578 copies/mL (895 IU/mL) in plasma samples (sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 100.0%) provided an optimal diagnosis for this test. The qPCR method improved patient management through the early detection of CMV colitis in patients with UC. However, reliance on qPCR positivity alone can lead to overdiagnosis. Quantification of CMV DNA can improve diagnostic specificity, although standardization is warranted.

Cytomegalovirus Infection: An Underrated Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment

CMV infection is still a matter of concern in IBD patients, especially regarding the disease's relapse management. Why IBD patients, particularly those affected by ulcerative colitis, are more susceptible to CMV reactivation is not totally explained, although a weakened immune system could be the reason. Various techniques, ranging from serology to histology, can be employed to detect intestinal CMV infection; however, there is currently disagreement in the literature regarding the most effective diagnostic test. Furthermore, CMV involvement in steroid resistance has been broadly discussed, but whether CMV infection is a cause or consequence of the disease severity and, consequently, steroid refractoriness is still debated. Its potential contribution to the lack of response to advanced therapy and small molecules must be more valued and wholly explored. In this review, we look at the actual literature on CMV in IBD patients, and we suggest a pragmatic algorithm for clinical practice management of CMV infection.

Apoptosis, Crypt Dropout, and Equivocal Immunohistochemical Staining May Indicate Cytomegalovirus Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis superimposed on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be challenging to diagnose. This study aimed to determine what histologic clues and immunohistochemistry (IHC) utilization practices, if any, can help diagnose CMV superinfection in IBD. Colon biopsies were reviewed from all patients with CMV colitis with and without IBD between 2010 and 2021 at one institution, along with a separate cohort of IBD patients with negative CMV IHC. Biopsies were assessed for histologic features of activity and chronicity, phlebitis, fibrin thrombi, basal crypt apoptosis, CMV viral cytopathic effect (VCE), and CMV IHC positivity. Features between groups were compared, with statistical significance set at P-value <0.05. The study included 251 biopsies from 143 cases (21 CMV-only, 44 CMV+IBD, 78 IBD-only). Compared with the IBD-only group, the CMV+IBD group was more likely to show apoptotic bodies (83% vs. 64%, P=0.035) and crypt dropout (75% vs. 55%, P=0.045). CMV was detected by IHC in 18 CMV+IBD cases without VCE on hematoxylin and eosin (41%). In the 23 CMV+IBD cases where IHC was performed on all concurrent biopsies, IHC was positive in at least 1 biopsy in 22 cases. Six individual CMV+IBD biopsies with no VCE on hematoxylin and eosin demonstrated equivocal IHC staining. Of these, 5 had evidence of CMV infection. IBD patients with superimposed CMV infection are more likely to demonstrate apoptotic bodies and crypt dropout compared with their noninfected counterparts. Equivocal IHC staining for CMV may indicate true infection in IBD patients, and staining multiple biopsies from the same accession can improve CMV detection.

A Review of Colonoscopy in Intestinal Diseases

Since the development of the fiberoptic colonoscope in the late 1960s, colonoscopy has been a useful tool to diagnose and treat various intestinal diseases. This article reviews the clinical use of colonoscopy for various intestinal diseases based on present and future perspectives. Intestinal diseases include infectious diseases, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), neoplasms, functional bowel disorders, and others. In cases of infectious diseases, colonoscopy is helpful in making the differential diagnosis, revealing endoscopic gross findings, and obtaining the specimens for pathology. Additionally, colonoscopy provides clues for distinguishing between infectious disease and IBD, and aids in the post-treatment monitoring of IBD. Colonoscopy is essential for the diagnosis of neoplasms that are diagnosed through only pathological confirmation. At present, malignant tumors are commonly being treated using endoscopy because of the advancement of endoscopic resection procedures. Moreover, the characteristics of tumors can be described in more detail by image-enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy. Colonoscopy can be helpful for the endoscopic decompression of colonic volvulus in large bowel obstruction, balloon dilatation as a treatment for benign stricture, and colon stenting as a treatment for malignant obstruction. In the diagnosis of functional bowel disorder, colonoscopy is used to investigate other organic causes of the symptom.

The association between antigenemia, histology with immunohistochemistry, and mucosal PCR in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis with concomitant human cytomegalovirus infection

BACKGROUND

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) colitis can be involved in active ulcerative colitis (UC) in patients refractory to steroid and immunosuppressive drugs. Histological examination with colonic biopsy specimens and antigenemia assays are the standard tests for diagnosing HCMV enterocolitis, and we have previously reported the usefulness of mucosal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. However, the associations among histopathological tests, antigenemia assays, and mucosal PCR are unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 82 UC patients who underwent mucosal biopsy from inflamed colonic tissues for histological evaluation and mucosal PCR to detect HCMV. We analyzed the relationships between the HCMV-DNA copy number in colonic mucosa and other HCMV tests.

RESULTS

In total, 131 HCMV mucosal PCR tests from 82 UC patients were positive. The HCMV-DNA copy number was significantly higher in patients with positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) (p < 0.01) and was correlated with the number of positive cells for the antigenemia (C7-HRP, p < 0.01; C10/11, p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed 1300 copies/μg of HCMV-DNA as the best diagnostic cut-off value to predict positive results of antigenemia (area under the curve = 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93). HCMV-DNA copy number also correlated with the total UCEIS score (p = 0.013) and the bleeding score (p = 0.014). For each individual patient, a positive correlation between the change in total UCEIS score and HCMV-DNA copy number was observed (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

The antigenemia assay and histopathological test with IHC were significantly associated with the HCMV-DNA copy number in colonic tissues. Moreover, endoscopic examination with the UCEIS can help diagnose the HCMV colitis in UC patients.

The diagnosis and management of CMV colitis in IBD patients shows high practice variation: a national survey among gastroenterologists

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines on cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are hampered by the low quality of evidence. In this study, we aim to explore the attitude and management of CMV colitis in IBD among gastroenterologists.

METHODS

A web-based survey was distributed to adult and pediatric gastroenterologists and trainees in academic and general hospitals in the Netherlands. The survey comprised data collection on respondents' demographics, attitudes towards the importance of CMV infection in IBD on a visual analogue scale (from 0 to 100), and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 73/131 invited respondents from 32 hospitals completed the survey (response rate of 56%). The importance of CMV infection was scored at a median 74/100. Respondents indicated CMV testing as appropriate in the clinical setting of steroid-refractory colitis (69% of respondents), hospitalized patients with active colitis (64%), immunomodulator or biological refractory colitis (55%) and active colitis irrespective of medication use (14%). CMV diagnostics include histology of colonic biopsies (88% of respondents), tissue CMV PCR (43%), serum CMV PCR (60%), CMV serology (25%) and fecal CMV PCR (4%). 82% of respondents start antiviral therapy after a positive CMV test on colonic biopsies (histology or PCR).

CONCLUSIONS

Most Dutch gastroenterologists acknowledge the importance of CMV colitis in IBD. Strategies vary greatly with regard to the indication for testing and diagnostic method, as well as indication for the start of antiviral therapy. These findings underline the need for pragmatic clinical studies on different management strategies, in order to reduce practice variation and improve the quality of care. Summary of the established knowledge on this subject:The clinical significance of CMV-associated colitis in IBD remains a matter of debateRecommendations regarding CMV colitis in current international guidelines are based on low to moderate evidence levels and different diagnostic strategies are proposed What are the significant and/or new findings of this study?We show that there is a high practice variation of diagnosis and management of CMV colitis in IBD amongst adult and pediatric gastroenterologistsThis study underlined the need for pragmatic studies and guidelines on different management strategies including cut-off values to start therapy.

Paediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: Experience in Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

Background. Endoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic mode of management in children with gastrointestinal disorders. Objective. To determine the indications, endoscopic yields and impact of the service on the ongoing health and complications among children who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town. Methods. A 10-year (2007 - 2016) retrospective study of children <18 years old who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy was undertaken using relevant patients’ variables obtained from their hospital medical records. Data were analysed using Stata 13.1 (p<0.05). Results. A total of 402 children underwent a total of 695 gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: 592 (85.2%) were gastroscopies, 78 (11.2%) combined gastroscopies with colonoscopies and 25 (3.6%) colonoscopy-only procedures, respectively. The main diagnostic indications for gastroscopy, gastroscopy combined with colonoscopy and colonoscopy-only were chronic abdominal pain (n=49; 12.2%), suspected inflammatory bowel disease (n=30; 7.5%) and rectal bleeding (n=13; 52.0%) respectively. The most common therapeutic indication for gastroscopy was change of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (n=143; 35.6%) while for colonoscopy 6 (5.8%) had polypectomy. Abnormal histopathological results were made from both macroscopically normal- and abnormal-looking tissues, though with no statistically significant relationship. Conclusion. Endoscopy offers diagnostic and therapeutic options in children. Positive histological findings were obtained in some cases where gastrointestinal mucosae appeared normal. There is need to obtain biopsies from both macroscopically normal- and abnormallooking gastrointestinal mucosae as positive histological findings could be made from them and hence improve diagnostic yield.

A Rare Case of Ulcerative Colitis with Severe Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus Colitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis are opportunistic infections that occur during immunosuppressive treatments for ulcerative colitis (UC). The prognosis of PJP and CMV colitis is very poor. We herein report a rare case of a 74-year-old UC patient with PJP and CMV colitis that was successfully treated with intensive therapy. PJP progresses rapidly, so the timing and choice of treatment are critical. Furthermore, a literature review of similar cases suggested that prophylactic therapy for opportunistic infections might be important, especially in the elderly. This case will serve as a reference for successful treatment in future cases.

Cytomegalovirus in ulcerative colitis: an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and treatment

INTRODUCTION

The detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease often creates confusion whether CMV is a 'bystander' or 'disease.'

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the clinical conundrum of CMV in ulcerative colitis, approach to discriminate infection from disease, and therapeutic considerations (immunosuppressive and anti-CMV treatment). CMV disease should be considered in corticosteroid refractory- dependent and thiopurine refractory disease. Endoscopy may reveal deep punched out ulcers, irregular ulcers, or cobble-stoning. The diagnosis rests on the presence and abundance of viral inclusion bodies on hematoxylin and eosin stain, positive immunohistochemistry, and/or positive tissue polymerase chain reaction. CMV disease is associated with worse outcomes including increased colectomy rates.

EXPERT OPINION

The timing and duration of antiviral drugs in CMV disease is debatable but depends on the load of CMV in tissue. In high-grade infection, CMV needs to be treated while increasing immunosuppression may work in the setting of low-grade infection. Ganciclovir is the drug of choice for treatment of CMV disease. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may be useful for treating underlying disease activity in the setting of CMV. Other emerging therapies include fecal microbiota transplantation. Randomized studies are necessary to define the best timing and duration of anti-CMV therapy.

Effects of tissue cytomegalovirus quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the management of ulcerative colitis flare-ups: Should we wave aside?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection for disease reactivation in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients remains controversial and diagnostic tests are yet to be standardized. We aimed to define the clinical relevance of CMV detection by mucosal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in UC patients by comparing the clinical course of UC in CMV-treated and CMV-untreated groups in tissue CMV-PCR positive cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 141 patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe UC admitted to our clinic with disease flare, colonic tissue CMV PCR was assessed.

RESULTS

The median age of the study population was 39 years, and 99 (70.2%) patients were male. Eighty-eight (62.4%) patients were CMV-PCR (+) and 53 (37.6%) were CMV PCR (-). The CMV-PCR (+) and CMV PCR (-) groups showed no significant difference concerning age, sex, disease duration, site of involvement and disease activity and administered treatments. The median tissue CMV-PCR was 41,098 IU/mL (IQR:2,344.25-136,192). Thirty-four of 88 CMV-PCR (+) patients received antiviral therapy. The tissue CMV-PCR level of patients who received antiviral therapy was 124,381 IU/mL (IQR: 19,309-412,335), and it was 6,292 IU/mL (IQR: 997-71,154) in patients who did not receive antiviral therapy; (p < 0.001). Sixteen (47.1%) of 34 patients who received antiviral therapy achieved remission. Two of the non-responders underwent colectomy (one because of dysplasia and one who did not respond subsequent biologic agent either). Remaing 16 achieved remission by escalating the immunsuppresive/biologic agent therapy.

CONCLUSION

CMV infection is responsible for only a minority of cases of UC flares and all are steroid-resistant cases. Most of the patients non-responsive to antiviral treatment respond to increased anti-inflammatory treatment. Hesitancy in the decision of escalating immunsuppresive treatment rather than CMV disease may be responsible for worsening disease course and increased colectomy rate in a significant number of the patients who are tissue CMV-PCR (+).

Risk Factors of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with exacerbation of disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the risk factors for CMV reactivation in this population remain debatable. This meta-analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for CMV reactivation in UC patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched from the inception of these databases to 31 August 2021, with the aim of identifying studies that investigated the risk factors of CMV reactivation in UC patients. A quality assessment of the included studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The publication bias was assessed respectively via a funnel plot and Egger’s regression asymmetry test. The robustness and reliability of each outcome were evaluated by sensitivity analysis. Twenty studies were included in the final meta-analysis, comprising a total of 2099 patients with UC. A significantly higher risk of CMV reactivation was observed in patients with severe UC (OR = 1.465, 95% CI: 1.107 to 1.939, p = 0.008), pancolitis (OR = 2.108, 95% CI: 1.586 to 2.800, p = 0.0001), older age of UC onset (MD = 6.212, 95% CI: 2.552 to 9.971, p = 0.001), as well as use of glucocorticoids (OR = 4.175, 95% CI: 3.076 to 5.666, p = 0.001), immunosuppressants (OR = 1.795, 95% CI: 1.289 to 2.501, p = 0.001), and azathioprine (OR = 1.444, 95% CI: 1.012 to 2.061, p = 0.043). However, infliximab treatment was observed not to increase the occurrence of CMV reactivation in patients who suffered from UC. In contrast, 5-aminosalicylic acid (OR = 0.674, 95% CI: 0.492 to 0.924, p = 0.014) was associated with a lower risk of CMV reactivation. Patients with UC should be closely monitored for risk factors of CMV reactivation in order to provide timely diagnosis and antiviral treatment.

Ulcerative Colitis and Cytomegalovirus Infection: From A to Z

Despite multiple studies, the role of cytomegalovirus [CMV] infection in exacerbating the severity of inflammation in ulcerative colitis [UC], and its response to treatment, remain debatable. Additionally, the optimal diagnostic tests for CMV infection in the setting of UC relapse, and timing of antiviral treatment initiation, remain unclear. The challenge faced by gastroenterologists is to differentiate between an acute UC flare and true CMV colitis. It seems that the presence of CMV colitis, as defined by the presence of intranuclear or intracellular inclusion bodies on haematoxylin and eosin [H&E] staining and/or positive immunohistochemistry [IHC] assay on histology, is associated with more severe colitis. Patients with CMV infection and acute severe colitis are more resistant to treatment with corticosteroids than non-infected patients. This refractoriness to steroids is related to colonic tissue CMV viral load and number of inclusion bodies [high-grade CMV infection] which may have a pronounced effect on clinical outcomes and colectomy rates. Whereas many studies showed no effect for antiviral treatment on colectomy rates in CMV-infected UC patients, there was a significant difference in colectomy rates of patients with high-grade infection who received anti-viral therapy compared with those who did not receive treatment. It was therefore proposed that high-grade CMV disease indicates that the virus is acting as a pathogen, whereas in those with low-grade CMV disease, the severity of IBD itself is more likely to influence outcome. The different algorithms that have been put forward for the management of patients with UC and concomitant CMV infection are discussed.

Cytomegalovirus and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) with a Special Focus on the Link with Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects approximately 40% of adults in France and persists lifelong as a latent agent in different organs, including gut. A close relationship is observed between inflammation that favors viral expression and viral replication that exacerbates inflammation. In this context, CMV colitis may impact the prognosis of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), and notably those with ulcerative colitis (UC). In UC, the mucosal inflammation and T helper cell (T_H) 2 cytokines, together with immunomodulatory drugs used for controlling flare-ups, favor viral reactivation within the gut, which, in turn, increases mucosal inflammation, impairs corticoid and immunosuppressor efficacy (the probability of steroid resistance is multiplied by more than 20 in the case of CMV colitis), and enhances the risk for colectomy. This review emphasizes the virological tools that are recommended for exploring CMV colitis during inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and underlines the interest of using ganciclovir for treating flare-ups associated to CMV colitis in UC patients.

Cytomegalovirus Colitis with a Cobblestone Appearance

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis with a cobblestone appearance is rare, and its endoscopic and pathological features remain poorly described. A 78-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for disturbance of consciousness, high-grade fever, and diarrhea occurring up to 7 times a day. Sigmoidoscopy revealed a circumferential ulcer with mucosal defect, an ulcer with a cobblestone appearance extending from the upper rectum to the sigmoid colon, and an irregular ulcer on the lower rectum. She was histopathologically diagnosed with CMV colitis and intravenously treated with ganciclovir (5 mg/kg) for 7 weeks. Colonoscopy after treatment revealed an improvement of the ulcers extending from the rectum to the sigmoid colon, but no significant improvement of her general condition. She died from sepsis 4 months after hospitalization. To our knowledge, this report represents a valuable addition to the CMV literature describing a rare case of CMV colitis with a cobblestone appearance.

Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches to Cytomegalovirus Infections in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Based on Clinical and Basic Research Data

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous herpesvirus (the human herpesvirus 5) and an opportunistic pathogen that primarily infects HIV-positive and other immuno-compromised patients. Retrospective studies in the field of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have suggested a relationship between a concomitant colonic HCMV infection and poor outcomes in patients with an ulcerative colitis (UC) due to the presence of HCMV in surgical specimens of patients with a toxic megacolon or a steroid-resistant UC. Therefore, gastroenterologists have focused on the contribution of HCMV infections in the exacerbation of UC. Numerous studies have addressed the benefits of treating colonic HCMV reactivation in UC using an antiviral treatment. However, its clinical relevance remains uncertain as only a few prospective studies have assessed the direct relationship between clinical outcomes and the viral load of HCMV in colonic tissues. HCMV reactivation can be triggered by inflammation according to fundamental research studies. Thus, optimal control of intestinal inflammation is essential for preventing an HCMV reactivation in the intestinal mucosa. Indeed, several reports have indicated the effectiveness of an anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) treatment in patients with an active UC and concomitant HCMV infections. In this review, we describe the mechanism of HCMV reactivation in UC cases and discuss the current issues regarding diagnosis and treatment of HCMV infections in UC patients.

Clinical Management of Infectious Diarrhea

BACKGROUND

Infectious diarrhea is the most common cause of diarrhea worldwide and is responsible for more deaths than other gastrointestinal tract diseases such as gastrointestinal cancers, peptic ulcer disease or inflammatory bowel disease. Diarrheal disease still represents the 8th leading cause of death worldwide, with more than 1,6 million attributed fatalities in 2016 alone. The majority of cases can be divided into three principal clinical presentations: acute watery diarrhea lasting 5-10 days and normally self-limiting, bloody diarrhea (dysentery), and persistent diarrhea with or without intestinal malabsorption.

METHODS

We performed an electronic search on PUBMED of the scientific literature concerning infectious diarrhea and its clinical management.

AIM

In this review article, we analyze the most important causes of infectious diarrhea and their constellation of signs and symptoms, providing an update on the diagnostic tools available in today's practice and on the different treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Even though the majority of intestinal infections are self-limiting in immunocompetent individuals, specific diagnosis and identification of the causative agent remain crucial from public health and epidemiological perspectives. Specific diagnostic investigation can be reserved for patients with severe dehydration, more severe illness, persistent fever, bloody stools, immunosuppression, and for cases of suspected nosocomial infection or outbreak and it includes complete blood count, creatinine and electrolytes evaluation, determination of leukocytes and lactoferrin presence in the stools, stool culture, together with C. difficile testing, PCR, ova and parasites' search, endoscopy and abdominal imaging. Since acute diarrhea is most often self-limited and caused by viruses, routine antibiotic use is not recommended for most adults with mild, watery diarrhea. However, when used appropriately, antibiotics are effective against shigellosis, campylobacteriosis, C. difficile colitis, traveler's diarrhea, and protozoal infections. Furthermore, antibiotics use should be considered in patients who are older than 65 years, immunocompromised, severely ill, or septic.

Clinical and endoscopic complications of Epstein-Barr virus in inflammatory bowel disease: an illustrative case series

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a proposed trigger in the etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and is associated with lymphoproliferative diseases. Nevertheless, testing for EBV DNA in the intestinal mucosa and screening for EBV infection before initiation of a drug therapy are not routinely performed. The aim of this article is to increase awareness of the relevance of EBV infection in specific clinical situations.

METHODS

In this short communication, we describe the disease course of three IBD patients with EBV infection, varying from EBV reactivation during disease flare up to a trigger of EBV-related mucocutaneous ulcer (EBV-MCU) and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).

RESULTS

Our first patient was diagnosed with EBV reactivation-associated severe colitis and showed a rapid clinical improvement after induction therapy with infliximab and azathioprine. Without antiviral treatment, the patient remained in complete remission and no complications of EBV were seen. After diagnosing EBV-MCU in the second patient, immunosuppressive medication was discontinued and four infusions of rituximab resulted in a rapid clinical recovery and eventually complete response. After discontinuation of the immunosuppression in our last patient with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, treatment with a combination of corticosteroid and antiviral therapy resulted in a complete recovery over a time span of several weeks.

CONCLUSION

EBV infection has a wide variety of potentially life-threatening clinical manifestations in IBD patients. Testing for EBV in case of a flare up and screening for EBV before the start of immunosuppressive therapy will create awareness for EBV-related symptoms or complications during follow-up.

Cytomegalovirus colitis in inflammatory bowel disease and after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: diagnostic accuracy, predictors, risk factors and disease outcome

BACKGROUND

Concurrent cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an important clinical entity associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 47 patients with IBD and 61 HSCT patients was performed regarding the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of applied methods, predictors, risk factors for CMV disease manifestation, the proportion of patients with antiviral treatment and disease outcome.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of quantitative PCR (qPCR) with a cut-off value of >250 copies/mg for CMV colitis in patients with IBD and HSCT patients was 79% and 92%, respectively. Predictors for CMV colitis in the IBD cohort were anaemia and the presence of endoscopic ulcers. Glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors and >2 concurrent lines of treatment with immunosuppressive drugs could be identified as risk factors for CMV colitis in the IBD cohort with an OR of 7.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 29.9), 21.3 (95% CI 2.4 to 188.7) and 13.4 (95% CI 3.2 to 56.1), respectively. Predictors and risk factors for CMV gastroenteritis in the HSCT cohort was the presence of endoscopic ulcers (OR 18.6, 95% CI 3.3 to 103.7) and >2 concurrent lines of treatment with immunosuppressive drugs. Antiviral therapy was administered in 70% of patients with IBD and 77% of HSCT patients with CMV disease. 71% of antiviral-treated patients with IBD showed an improvement of their disease activity and 14% underwent colectomy. The mortality rate of HSCT patients was 21% irrespective of their CMV status.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the implementation of histological methods, qPCR may be performed in patients with suspected high-risk IBD and HSCT patients for CMV colitis. Independent validations of these results in further prospective studies are needed.

Cytomegalovirus infection in ulcerative colitis assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction: risk factors and effects of immunosuppressants

We investigated the risk factors of and appropriate treatment for cytomegalovirus colitis in patients with ulcerative colitis, using quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis to detect cytomegalovirus in the colonic mucosa. Between February 2013 and January 2017, patients with exacerbated ulcerative colitis who were admitted to our hospital were consecutively enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Patients were evaluated for cytomegalovirus using serology (antigenemia) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of the colonic mucosa, which were sampled during colonoscopy. Of 86 patients, 26 (30.2%) had positive quantitative polymerase chain reaction results for cytomegalovirus; only 4 were also positive for antigenemia. The ages of the cytomegalovirus DNA-positive patients were significantly higher than those of negative patients (p = 0.002). The mean endoscopic score of cytomegalovirus DNA-positive patients was significantly higher than that of cytomegalovirus DNA-negative patients. Treatment with combined immunosuppressants was associated with an increased risk of cytomegalovirus. Fourteen of 15 (93.3%) cytomegalovirus DNA-positive patients who were negative for antigenemia showed a clinical response to treatment with additional oral tacrolimus, without ganciclovir. cytomegalovirus reactivation in active ulcerative colitis is associated with age and combined immunosuppressant therapy. Because additional treatment with tacrolimus was effective, patients who are negative for antigenemia and cytomegalovirus DNA-positive colonic mucosa may recover without antiviral therapy.

Outcome of Cytomegalovirus Colitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Different Regimes of Ganciclovir

BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and is responsible for relapse, increased severity, and poor outcome if left untreated. Ganciclovir is the mainstay of treatment but data regarding its use, mode of administration, and duration of treatment is poorly described. We reviewed the practice of treating CMV colitis with different regimes of ganciclovir at a district NHS hospital to compare the clinical outcome. METHODS 35 patients with IBD and concurrent diagnosis of CMV infection were evaluated. The parameters studied were clinical outcome in term of clinical response, length of hospital stay, readmission, or colectomy with three different regimes of ganciclovir, in addition to treatment for IBD. RESULTS 35 patients with IBD (ulcerative colitis = 23, Crohn's disease = 5, Indeterminate colitis = 7) and positive diagnosis of CMV infection were studied. Clinical outcome with two weeks of intravenous (IV) ganciclovir regime was superior than one week of IV ganciclovir and two weeks of oral Valganciclovir in term of clinical response on day 15 (95.8% vs 74%, 24.3%, respectively p = 0.45) and colectomy rate within 3 months (6.25% vs 27.3%, vs 25%, respectively). CONCLUSION CMV colitis is associated with poor outcome in patient with IBD if left untreated. 2 weeks IV ganciclovir was associated with a better outcome than 1 week of IV treatment or oral treatment.

Cytomegalovirus infection associated with inflammatory bowel disease

Refractory colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is a complicated clinical disorder that might, in some patients, even necessitate surgery. Hence the diagnosis of additional complications is of utmost importance. Colitis mediated by cytomegalovirus is one such complication. The high seroprevalence and latent nature of cytomegalovirus, with the possibility of viral replication without mediating disease, poses a real challenge for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus-mediated colitis. The challenge in daily clinical practice is to distinguish cytomegalovirus replication from cytomegalovirus-mediated colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who have refractory colitis. This Review discusses the scientific literature and provides a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for clinical practice.

Pancolitis associated with higher mortality risk of cytomegalovirus colitis in patients without inflammatory bowel disease

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis typically presents in immunocompromised and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Several studies have been conducted on the endoscopic characteristics of CMV colitis in IBD patients.

Objectives

The endoscopic findings of CMV colitis in non-IBD patients and their relationship with inhospital mortality are unclear. We aimed to describe the endoscopic presentation in these patients and to determine the endoscopic predictors of inhospital mortality.

Patients and methods

Patients with CMV colitis diagnosed using histology between April 2002 and December 2016 at the Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, were retrospectively enrolled. Patients diagnosed with IBD during follow-up were excluded. Patient data, including underlying diseases, endoscopic presentation, laboratory data, clinical course, complications, and clinical outcomes, were collected. The independent risk factors for inhospital mortality were analyzed with logistic regression. The difference of overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log rank test. All statistical calculations were performed using SPSS software, version 21.

Results

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled, and 8 IBD patients were excluded. Within the 61 non-IBD patients, 31 were diagnosed by colonoscopy and others by sigmoidoscopy. Ulceration (77%) was the most common endoscopic finding, followed by a cobblestone appearance (19.7%), colitis with/without erosions (9.8%), pseudomembrane (9.8%), and tumor/polyp-like lesions (8.2%). Among the patients who underwent full-length colonoscopy, 35.3% presented with right-sided colitis, 23.5% with left-sided colitis, and 32.4% with pancolitis. Pancolitis was identified as a negative predictor of inhospital mortality (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.233-37.497; p=0.028) and overall survival (log rank p=0.018).

Conclusion

Colonoscopy is recommended for precise CMV colitis diagnosis and outcome prediction in non-IBD patients.

Adsorptive Depletion of Myeloid Lineage Leucocytes as Remission Induction Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis after Failure of First-Line Medications: Results from a Three-Year Real World, Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC), pharmacologics, although initially effective in most patients, are associated with refractoriness, loss of response or unfavourable side effects as additional morbidity factors. Depletion of myeloid lineage leucocytes like the CD14(+)CD16(+) monocyte phenotype, which is a major source of tumour necrosis factor-α, by granulocyte/monocyte apheresis (GMA) if effective, is also known to be free from side effects.

METHODS

In clinical practice setting, 77 consecutive patients with moderate to severe UC, who failed to respond to first-line medications received GMA with the Adacolumn as remission induction therapy. Patients who achieved remission were followed for 3 years.

RESULTS

Among the 77 patients, 46.8% were corticosteroids-naïve, 26% corticosteroid-dependent and 27.3% corticosteroid-refractory. The overall clinical remission rate was 79.2%, and the overall mucosal healing (MH) rate according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 was 58.5%. MH rates in corticosteroid-naïve, corticosteroid-dependent and corticosteroid-refractory subgroups were 70.8, 56.3, and 38.5%, respectively. The 3-year sustained clinical remission rates in corticosteroid-naïve, corticosteroid-dependent and corticosteroid-refractory subgroups were 83.3, 68.8, and 23.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid-naïve patients appeared to benefit the most from the Adacolumn GMA, and attain a favourable long-term clinical course. Accordingly, GMA should be a first-line therapy in this clinical setting.

Evidence-based consensus on opportunistic infections in inflammatory bowel disease (republication)

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are a high-risk population for opportunistic infections. The IBD group of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology of the Chinese Medical Association organized an expert group to discuss and develop this consensus opinion. This consensus opinion referenced clinical study results from China and other countries to provide guidance for clinical practices. Eight major topics, including cytomegalovirus infection, Epstein-Barr virus infection, viral hepatitis, bacterial infection, Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, fungal infection, parasitic infection, and vaccines were introduced in this article.

Colonic cytomegalovirus detection by mucosal PCR and antiviral therapy in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with colonic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in ulcerative colitis (UC) and to compare the clinical course between antiviral therapy-treated and -untreated groups in mucosal CMV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -positive cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 46 UC patients (>15 years old) in active phase who underwent colonoscopy with biopsy and were analyzed for CMV infection by mucosal PCR between October 2011 and December 2015 at our institution. Colonic CMV in inflamed mucosa was detected using quantitative real-time PCR. The clinical course was evaluated, including need for drug therapy/surgery or drug therapy intensification. In addition, we evaluated the clinical course between CMV-DNA- cases and CMV-DNA+ cases with low viral load.

RESULTS

At baseline, CMV-DNA+ patients were significantly older, had higher endoscopic scores, and required higher corticosteroid doses during the past 4 weeks than CMV-DNA- patients (p< 0.05). No significant differences were observed in disease duration, disease distribution, laboratory data, or use of other medication between CMV-DNA+ and CMV-DNA- patients. In the anti-CMV-treated group with a median (range) DNA load of 16,000 (9,000-36,400), 3patients achieved remission without additional UC therapy, 2 required additional UC therapy, and 1 required colectomy despite azathioprine and infliximab therapy. In the CMV-untreated group with a median (range) DNA load of 919 (157-5,480), all patients achieved remission with UC therapy alone. No significant difference was observed in the clinical course between CMV-DNA- cases and CMV-DNA+ cases with low viral loads.

CONCLUSIONS

Aging, endoscopic UC activity, and corticosteroid dose predispose to colonic CMV infection, as determined by mucosal PCR, in UC. UC treatment without anti-CMV therapy may be warranted, particularly in patients with low-load CMV-DNA. Anti-CMV therapy alone does not always achieve clinical response in UC even in cases with high-load PCR.

Approach to cytomegalovirus infections in patients with ulcerative colitis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is common in patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC), and may ref lect exacerbation of mucosal inf lammation and/or administration of immunosuppressants. The question of whether CMV is an active pathogen or 'an innocent bystander' in the exacerbation of UC remains controversial. Patients with UC exacerbated by reactivated CMV experience worse prognoses than those without CMV reactivation and antiviral therapy significantly reduces the need for colectomy in patients with severe UC and high-grade CMV infection, indicating that CMV plays a role in UC prognosis. Therefore, the CMV status of patients on immunosuppressants, particularly those with steroid-refractory or -dependent UC, should be tested. When CMV is detected, be performed based on should adequate treatment the extent of the viral load and the presence of certain clinical features including a large ulcer. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents may be useful for treating CMV colitis complicating UC.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Blood-Based Tests and Histopathology for Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if traditional histopathology and noninvasive blood-based tests are sufficiently accurate to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in inflammatory bowel disease. Therefore, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of these tests compared with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tissue polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases was performed from inception through January 2016 for observational studies comparing diagnostic tests for CMV reactivation in inflammatory bowel disease. IHC and tissue PCR were considered reference standards and were used to evaluate the accuracy of blood-based tests and hematoxylin and eosin histopathology. Weighted summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies examined the accuracy of blood-based tests for predicting colonic CMV reactivation: 5 studies by pp65 antigenemia and 4 studies by blood PCR. The overall sensitivity was 50.8% (95% CI, 19.9-81.6), the specificity was 99.9% (95% CI, 99-100), and the positive predictive value was 83.8% (95% CI, 58.6-95.0). The sensitivities of pp65 and blood PCR were 39.7% (95% CI, 27.4-52.1) and 60.0% (95% CI, 46.5-73.5), respectively. Nine studies examined the sensitivity of histopathology. The overall sensitivity was 12.5% (95% CI, 3.6-21.4), 34.6% by IHC (95% CI, 13.8-55.4), and 4.7% by tissue PCR (95% CI, 1.2-17.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Although blood-based tests seem to predict colonic CMV reactivation, they are insensitive tests. Similarly, histopathology has poor sensitivity for detecting colonic CMV. In agreement with current guidelines, these tests should not replace IHC or tissue PCR for detecting CMV reactivation in inflammatory bowel disease.

Corticosteroids and Thiopurines, But Not Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists, are Associated With Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and individual immunosuppressive agents in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been clearly defined. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this association.

METHODS

Multiple electronic databases were searched systematically through July 2015 for observational studies reporting CMV reactivation (based on serum-based or tissue-based tests) in IBD patients stratified by medication exposure. We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Sixteen observational studies were identified. As compared with nonexposed patients, exposure to corticosteroids (CS) (12 studies, 1180 patients, 52.3% exposed; OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.40-2.99) and thiopurines (14 studies, 1273 patients, 24.1% exposed; OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.01-2.39) was associated with increased risk of CMV reactivation. In contrast, as compared with patients not exposed to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, exposure to TNF antagonists was not associated with an increased risk of CMV reactivation (7 studies, 818 patients, 18.5% exposed; OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.93-2.24). The results remained stable for CS and thiopurines when the analysis was limited to hospitalized patients, and by a tissue-based diagnosis. Studies were limited in the ability to assess the impact of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy, duration of medication exposure, and disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of 16 observational studies, exposure to CS or thiopurines, but not TNF antagonists, was associated with an increased risk of CMV reactivation in IBD patients.

Establishment of a rat model of ulcerative colitis with abnormal sapra syndrome of traditional Uyghur medicine and detection of changes in inflammation related factors in colon tissue of this model

AIM

To develop a rat model of ulcerative colitis (UC) with abnormal sapra syndrome and detect the changes in inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) hnRNA and mRNA expression in colon tissues of this model.

METHODS

Based on a rat model of abnormal sapra syndrome, trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid/ethanol was used to induce UC in rats with abnormal sapra syndrome. Rats were randomly divided into two groups: normal group and UC with abnormal sapra syndrome model group. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to detect the differences in iNOS and eNOS hnRNA and mRNA expression in colon tissues of rats in the two groups.

RESULTS

UC with abnormal sapra syndrome was successfully induced as evidenced by the presence of anticipated signs, symptoms and colonic mucosa damage. Compared with the normal group, the expression of iNOS hnRNA in colon tissue was significantly upregulated in the model group (P < 0.05), but the expression of eNOS hnRNA in colon tissue showed no statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The expression of iNOS and eNOS mRNA was significantly upregulated in the model group compared with the normal group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The inflammatory factors iNOS and eNOS are involved in the development of UC in rats with abnormal sapra syndrome, and changes in inflammation related factors are mediated by a post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism.

Endoscopic evaluation in diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease

Endoscopy is a keystone in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is the fundamental diagnostic tool for IBD, and can help discern between ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Endoscopic assessment provides an objective end point in clinical trials, and identifies patients in clinical practice who may benefit from treatment escalation and may assist risk stratification in patients seeking to discontinue therapy. Recent advances in endoscopic assessment of patients with IBD include video capsule endoscopy, and chromoendoscopy. Technological advances enable improved visualization and focused biopsy sampling. Endoscopic resection and close surveillance of dysplastic lesions where feasible is recommended instead of prophylactic colectomy.

Targeting cytomegalovirus during ulcerative colitis flare-ups

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of opportunistic infection leading to severe and fatal disease in immune-compromised individuals. In inflammatory bowel disease patients, particularly those with ulcerative colitis (UC), CMV is often reactivated because these patients are frequently treated with immunosuppressive agents. Many reports have described the relationship between CMV reactivation and UC exacerbation, however, a therapeutic strategy for CMV infection in UC patients has not been established. Area covered: This review highlights therapeutic strategies for UC patients with CMV infection. Recent findings have suggested a benefit from antiviral therapy in patients with histologically proven CMV colitis and/or a high colonic CMV load as determined by quantitative PCR. Expert commentary: To decide who requires antiviral therapies and when we start antiviral therapies, prospective studies of large numbers of UC patients with CMV infection are needed. However, we should know that the bottom-line therapy for UC patients with CMV infection is to optimally control mucosal inflammation.

Characteristic endoscopic findings and risk factors for cytomegalovirus-associated colitis in patients with active ulcerative colitis

AIM: To identify characteristic endoscopic findings and risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated colitis in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS: A total of 149 UC patients admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Hospital, from January 2004 to December 2013 with exacerbation of UC symptoms were enrolled in this retrospective study. All medical records, including colonoscopy results, were reviewed. CMV infection was determined by the presence of CMV antigen, CMV inclusion bodies in biopsy specimens, or positive specific immunohistochemical staining for CMV. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for CMV colitis.

RESULTS: Multivariate analysis indicated independent associations with the extent of disease (pancolitis) and use of > 400 mg corticosteroids for the previous 4 wk. In contrast, no association was seen with sex, age at UC diagnosis, immunomodulator use, or infliximab use. Punched-out ulceration was also significantly associated with CMV infection in patients with active UC (odds ratio = 12.672, 95%CI: 4.210-38.143).

CONCLUSION: Identification of a total corticosteroid dose > 400 mg for 4 wk, extensive colitis and a specific endoscopic finding of punched-out ulcer might facilitate the more rapid diagnosis and timely initiation of antiviral therapy for CMV-associated colitis in patients with active UC.

Cytomegalovirus and ulcerative colitis: Place of antiviral therapy

The link between cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and inflammatory bowel diseases remains an important subject of debate. CMV infection is frequent in ulcerative colitis (UC) and has been shown to be potentially harmful. CMV reactivation needs to be diagnosed using methods that include in situ detection of viral markers by immunohistochemistry or by nucleic acid amplification techniques. Determination of the density of infection using quantitative tools (numbers of infected cells or copies of the genome) is particularly important. Although CMV reactivation can be considered as an innocent bystander in active flare-ups of refractory UC, an increasing number of studies suggest a deleterious role of CMV in this situation. The presence of colonic CMV infection is possibly linked to a decreased response to steroids and other immunosuppressive agents. Some treatments, notably steroids and cyclosporine A, have been shown to favor CMV reactivation, which seems not to be the case for therapies using anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. According to these findings, in flare-ups of refractory UC, it is now recommended to look for the presence of CMV reactivation by using quantitative tools in colonic biopsies and to treat them with ganciclovir in cases of high viral load or severe disease.

Cytomegalovirus in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review

AIM

To identify definitions of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and intestinal disease, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), to determine the prevalence associated with these definitions.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and interrogated PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane for literature on prevalence and diagnostics of CMV infection and intestinal disease in IBD patients. As medical headings we used "cytomegalovirus" OR "CMV" OR "cytomegalo virus" AND "inflammatory bowel disease" OR "IBD" OR "ulcerative colitis" OR "colitis ulcerosa" OR "Crohn's disease". Both MeSH-terms and free searches were performed. We included all types of English-language (clinical) trials concerning diagnostics and prevalence of CMV in IBD.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 924 citations, and 52 articles were eligible for inclusion. We identified 21 different definitions for CMV infection, 8 definitions for CMV intestinal disease and 3 definitions for CMV reactivation. Prevalence numbers depend on used definition, studied population and region. The highest prevalence for CMV infection was found when using positive serum PCR as a definition, whereas for CMV intestinal disease this applies to the use of tissue PCR > 10 copies/mg tissue. Most patients with CMV infection and intestinal disease had steroid refractory disease and came from East Asia.

CONCLUSION

We detected multiple different definitions used for CMV infection and intestinal disease in IBD patients, which has an effect on prevalence numbers and eventually on outcome in different trials.

Cytomegalovirus-induced Hemorrhagic Colitis in a Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (Chronic Phase) on Dasatinib as an Upfront Therapy

Dasatinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of newly diagnosed adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase and accelerated (myeloid or lymphoid blast) phase, and CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy including imatinib and in adults with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia1 The most common adverse reactions (≥15%) in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase (CP) CML include myelosuppression, fluid retention, and diarrhea, whereas in patients with resistance or intolerance to prior imatinib therapy, side effects include myelosuppression, fluid retention, diarrhea, headache, dyspnea, skin rash, fatigue, nausea, and hemorrhage. We report a 39-year-old Ethiopian female patient who received dasatinib as upfront therapy for the treatment of CP-CML who experienced chronic diarrhea for two months, which progressed to hemorrhagic colitis due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of the colon. To our knowledge, this is the first case of CMV colitis in a patient receiving dasatinib as upfront therapy.

Review article: cytomegalovirus and inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The association between ulcerative colitis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been recognised for over 50 years; and the role of CMV in ulcerative colitis in general, and steroid resistance in particular, remains a topic of ongoing controversy. The outcome for patients with CMV reactivation appears worse than that for patients without reactivation, but it is not entirely clear whether CMV is a contributor or a bystander and if treatment with anti-virals alters the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIM

To review the role of CMV associated with IBD, including epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management strategies.

METHODS

By reviewing literature available on CMV associated with IBD in adult patients. A PubMed literature search was performed using the following terms individually or in combination: CMV colitis, cytomegalovirus colitis, IBD and CMV, CMV treatment.

RESULTS

Cytomegalovirus reactivation is common in patients with severe colitis, with a reported prevalence of 4.5-16.6%, and as high as 25% in patients requiring colectomy for severe colitis. The outcome for this group of patients appears worse than that for patients without reactivation; however, reported remission rates following treatment with anti-viral therapy are as high as 71-86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence, although not conclusive, supports testing for CMV colonic disease in cases of moderate to severe colitis, by processing biopsies for haematoxylin and eosin staining with immunohistochemistry and/or, CMV DNA real-time polymerase chain reaction; and if present treating with ganciclovir.

Determination of cytomegalovirus prevalence and glycoprotein B genotypes among ulcerative colitis patients in ahvaz, iran

Background:

The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a common pathogen which usually remains asymptomatic in the healthy adults; however, it can cause a symptomatic disease in the immunocompromised patients. The risk of infection with HCMV increases in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients as a result of receiving immunosuppressive agents.

Objectives:

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and the glycoprotein B genotypes of HCMV among the patients with HCMV disease superimposed on an UC flare that required hospitalization in Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz, Iran, during 2010- 2012.

Patients and Methods:

In this case-control study, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded intestinal tissue samples were taken from 98 patients with UC disease including 53 males and 45 females (mean age ± standard deviation, 38.95 ± 17.93) and 67 control patients with noninflammatory disease who were referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital during 2010-2012. Detection of HCMV genome in intestinal samples was carried out by seminested polymerase chain reaction. Glycoprotein B genotypes were determined by sequencing.

Results:

Among 98 patients with UC, only 12 (12.2%) patients were positive for HCMV genome, while the HCMV genome was not detected in any of the controls. (P = 0.002). The distribution of HCMV gB genotypes in 12 CMV-positive UC patients was as follow: gB1, 11 (91.7%) and gB3, 1 (8.3%). The most prevalent genotype in CMV-positive UC patients was gB1.

Conclusions:

In this study, high prevalence of 91.7% HCMV gB1 genotype was predominant among HCMV-positive UC patients, which suggests that there might be an association between HCMV gB genotype 1 and UC disease.

A model for identifying cytomegalovirus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The presentation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be similar to that of idiopathic IBD. It is a challenge to identify patients at highest risk for CMV. We investigated risk factors and generated a clinical score to identify patients with IBD at highest risk for CMV disease.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study of 68 patients with IBD (66% with ulcerative colitis, 31% with Crohn's disease, and 3% with unclassified IBD) diagnosed with CMV disease on the basis of tissue analysis from January 2005 through December 2011 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The patients were each matched with 3 patients with IBD and suspected CMV disease (controls). An a priori set of the most objective variables was used to create a model to identify those with CMV disease. Scores were assigned to each significant factor from the multivariable analysis. Cutoff values that identified patients with CMV with ≥85% sensitivity and specificity were selected.

RESULTS

Patients with medically refractory IBD (odds ratio [OR], 3.69; P < .001) or endoscopic ulcers (OR, 3.06; P < .001) and those treated with corticosteroids (OR, 2.95; P < .001) or immunomodulators (OR, 1.86; P = .030) but not tumor necrosis factor antagonists (OR, 1.30; P = .376) were more likely to have CMV disease than patients with IBD without these features. In a multivariable model, refractory disease, treatment with immunomodulators, and age older than 30 years were independently associated with CMV disease. Use of tumor necrosis factor antagonists was an insignificant factor even after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical features can identify patients with IBD at risk for CMV disease. This model may help clinicians stratify patients on the basis of risk when CMV disease is suspected.

Relationship between human cytomegalovirus infection and refractory ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the relationship between human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection and refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), and evaluate the necessity of antiviral therapy in refractory UC patients with HCMV infection.

METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, CNKI and Wanfang databases till 2013 to retrieve relevant studies. Meta-analyses were performed for the included case-control studies using RevMan4.2 software after strict screening to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between HCMV infection and refractory UC. We also performed heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment.

RESULTS: Eighteen eligible studies, including 15 carried out by foreigners and 3 by Chinese researchers, were included in the meta-analysis, involving 831 patients with UC. Seven included studies were analyzed at both blood and intestinal tissue levels. Six studies on HCMV infection and refractory UC were also collected for analysis at intestinal tissue level. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the HCMV infection rate between patients with refractory UC and health controls (OR = 10.62, 95%CI: 4.79-23.54, P < 0.00001). At the blood level, three studies on HCMV infection and refractory UC were collected. It was showed that there was a significant difference in the HCMV infection rate between patients with refractory UC and health controls (OR = 3.22, 95%CI: 1.48-7.00, P = 0.003). Six studies on patients with active UC who were infected with HCMV and non-responsive to steroids were collected. The results of meta-analysis showed that the incidence of hormone resistance in patients with refractory UC was positively correlated with the HCMV infection rate (OR = 8.88, 95%CI: 4.43-17.17, P < 0.00001). Three studies on whether antiviral therapy could increase platelet count in patients with refractory UC were collected. It was showed that the group treated by antiviral therapy was superior to others in the response rate (OR = 7.53, 95%CI: 1.59-35.72, P = 0.01). Funnel plot analysis indicated the existence of publication bias.

CONCLUSION: Patients with refractory UC undergoing steroid treatment are susceptible to HCMV infection. In the presence of HCMV, UC becomes more complex. Patients with active UC who are infected with HCMV are usually non-responders to steroids. The prompt application of antiviral therapy can significantly improve the condition of patients with refractory UC. High quality, multi-center, prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Clinical utility of cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay and blood cytomegalovirus DNA PCR for cytomegaloviral colitis patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Clinical usefulness of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay and blood CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) needs to be evaluated.

METHODS

Medical records of moderate to severe UC patients between January 2001 and December 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Diagnostic performances of CMV antigenemia assay and blood PCR to predict CMV colitis, and clinical outcome according to the results were analyzed. CMV colitis was diagnosed by H&E staining and/or CMV immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Of the 229 study subjects, 83 patients (36.2%) had CMV colitis. The sensitivity and specificity of CMV antigenemia assay were 47.0% and 81.7%, and those of blood CMV DNA PCR were 44.3% and 87.9%, respectively. If either CMV antigenemia or PCR was positive in the presence of significant ulcers, the sensitivity and specificity of having CMV colitis were 67.3% and 75.7%, respectively, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.717. Among patients with significant ulcers, positive CMV antigenemia (33/50 [66.0%] vs. 31/102 [30.4%]; p<0.001) and positive blood CMV PCR (25/37 [67.6%] vs. 24/86 [27.9%]; p<0.001) showed significantly higher probability of CMV colitis than blood test-negative patients. UC-CMV colitis patients with positive CMV antigenemia showed significantly higher rate of colectomy than those with negative antigenemia (13/39 [33.3%] vs. 5/44 [11.4%]; p=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Although CMV antigenemia and blood CMV PCR showed low sensitivity for diagnosing CMV colitis, the specificity values were high. Among UC-CMV colitis patients, CMV antigenemia showed significant association with subsequent colectomy.

The histopathological approach to inflammatory bowel disease: a practice guide

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are lifelong disorders predominantly present in developed countries. In their pathogenesis, an interaction between genetic and environmental factors is involved. This practice guide, prepared on behalf of the European Society of Pathology and the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation, intends to provide a thorough basis for the histological evaluation of resection specimens and biopsy samples from patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Histopathologically, these diseases are characterised by the extent and the distribution of mucosal architectural abnormality, the cellularity of the lamina propria and the cell types present, but these features frequently overlap. If a definitive diagnosis is not possible, the term indeterminate colitis is used for resection specimens and the term inflammatory bowel disease unclassified for biopsies. Activity of disease is reflected by neutrophil granulocyte infiltration and epithelial damage. The evolution of the histological features that are useful for diagnosis is time- and disease-activity dependent: early disease and long-standing disease show different microscopic aspects. Likewise, the histopathology of childhood-onset IBD is distinctly different from adult-onset IBD. In the differential diagnosis of severe colitis refractory to immunosuppressive therapy, reactivation of latent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection should be considered and CMV should be tested for in all patients. Finally, patients with longstanding IBD have an increased risk for the development of adenocarcinoma. Dysplasia is the universally used marker of an increased cancer risk, but inter-observer agreement is poor for the categories low-grade dysplasia and indefinite for dysplasia. A diagnosis of dysplasia should not be made by a single pathologist but needs to be confirmed by a pathologist with expertise in gastrointestinal pathology.