Improvement of prognosis for unresectable biliary tract cancer

Therapeutic Outcome of Multidisciplinary Treatment in Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Background

There is little established evidence regarding treatment strategies for unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aimed to clarify the situation of multidisciplinary treatment for unresectable BTC in the 2000s when there was no international standard first-line therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 315 consecutive patients with unresectable BTC who had been treated at seven tertiary institutions in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan between 1999 and 2008.

Results

The unresectable factors were as follows: locally advanced, 101 cases (32.1%); hematogenous metastases, 80 cases (25.4%); and peritoneal dissemination, 30 cases (9.5%). Chemotherapy or radiation therapy was administered to 218 patients (69.2%). The best supportive care was provided in 97 cases (30.8%). The most common regimen was gemcitabine monotherapy, followed by gemcitabine combination therapy and S-1 monotherapy. The 1- and 2-year survival rates of all patients were 34.6% and 12.2%, respectively. The median survival time (MST) was 8 months in all patients. The 1-year survival rate was 65%, and the MST was 12 months among the locally advanced patients, whereas patients with peritoneal dissemination had the worst outcome; the 1-year survival rate was 7%, and the MST was 5 months. Among treated 90 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, patients who received chemoradiotherapy (n = 24) had a significantly better outcome than those who received chemotherapy alone (MST: 20 vs. 11 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Unresectable BTC has heterogeneous treatment outcomes depending on the mode of tumor extension and location. Multidisciplinary treatment seems useful for patients with locally advanced BTC, whereas patients with metastatic disease still have a poor prognosis.

Uncovered versus covered metallic stents for the management of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a randomized multicenter trial

OBJECTIVE

The treatment result of the uncovered metallic stent (uncovered MS) and covered metallic stent (covered MS) for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction is controversial. This time, we conducted this study to compare the efficacies and complication rates of uncovered MS and covered MS in unresectable malignant distal biliary obstructions at a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2014 to September 2018, patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the uncovered MS group and the covered MS group.

RESULTS

92 treatment results patients were discussed. 48 patients were assigned to the uncovered MS group and 44 cases were assigned to the covered MS group. Both groups showed a drainage effect. No significant difference was found in the drainage effect between the 2 groups. The number of stent occlusion was significantly greater (p = .0467) in uncovered MS (43.8%) comparing with those in covered MS (22.7%). As the cause of stent occlusion, tumor ingrowth was significantly greater (p < .001) in the uncovered MS group (35.4%) than in the covered MS group (2.3%). The median stent patency period was significantly longer (p = .0112) in the covered MS group (455 days) than that of the uncovered MS group (301 days). A significant difference in the median survival period was not found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Covered MS showed the possibility of extending the stent patency period by suppressing tumor ingrowth more than uncovered MS does. The UMIN Clinical Trial Registry number is UMIN000015093.

Comparison between Fluoropyrimidine-Cisplatin and Gemcitabine-Cisplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) has been regarded as standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Fluoropyrimidine-cisplatin (FP) has also shown a survival benefit. However, the clinical choice between them is controversial.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the two chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, RCTs, and 3 retrospective studies) involving 727 patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in overall response rate, ORR (risk ratio, RR = 1.13, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.80-1.58, p = 0.489), disease control rate, DCR (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.91-1.13, p = 0.751), progression-free survival/time to progression (hazard rate, HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05, p = 0.315) and overall survival (HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.98-1.14, p = 0.125). As compared with GP, FP showed lower incidences of all grade 3/4 adverse events with statistical significance (p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis of RCTs, no statistical differences were found between FP and GP in ORR (RR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.58-1.95; p = 0.842) and DCR (RR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.00-1.50; p = 0.056), but FP showed significantly lower incidences of all grade 3/4 adverse events compared with GP (p < 0.01). Some limitations of the meta-analysis are retrospective studies included, some end points within the trials missing rendering a pooled analysis of the two RCTs impossible and heterogeneous fluoropyrimidine combinations. All studies were performed in Asia which are not completely transferable to European patients.

CONCLUSION

With some limitations, the meta-analysis suggested that FP seems to be as effective as GP with a more favorable safety profile in first-line chemotherapy for Asian patients with advanced BTC.

Safety and efficacy of metallic stent for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction in elderly patients

AIM

To study the safety of insertion of metallic stents in elderly patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction.

METHODS

Of 272 patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction, 184 patients under the age of 80 were classified into Group A, and 88 subjects aged 80 years or more were classified into Group B. The safety of metallic stent insertion, metal stent patency period, and the obstruction rate were examined in each group.

RESULTS

In Group B, patients had a significantly worse performance status, high blood pressure, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and dementia; besides the rate of patients orally administered antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants tended to be higher (P < 0.05). Metallic stents were successfully inserted in all patients. The median patency period was 265.000 ± 26.779 (1-965) d; 252.000 ± 35.998 (1-618) d in Group A and 269.000 ± 47.885 (1-965) d in Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups. Metallic stent obstruction occurred in 82 of the 272 (30.15%) patients; in 53/184 (28.80%) patients in Group A and in 29/88 (32.95%) of those in Group B, showing no significant difference between the two groups. Procedural accidents due to metal stent insertion occurred in 24/272 (8.8%) patients; in 17/184 (9.2%) of patients in Group A and in 7/88 (8.0%) of those in Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups, either.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that metallic stents can be safely inserted to treat unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction even in elderly patients aged 80 years or more.

Recent advances for the treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer after first-line treatment failure

Here, we evaluate clinical trials on chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic or biliary tract cancer after first-line treatment failure. Clinical trials on conventional and innovative medical treatments for progressive pancreatic and biliary cancer were analyzed. Metronomic chemotherapy, which consists of the administration of continuative low-dose of anticancer drugs, was also considered. A significant extension of overall survival was achieved with second-line, regimens in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. Moreover, many Phase II studies, including chemotherapy and target molecules and immunotherapy, have reported promising results, in both pancreatic and biliary cancer. However, data in these patients' setting are very heterogeneous, and only few randomized studies are available.

Treatment outcomes of chemotherapy between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer

AIM: To evaluate the differences in the treatment outcomes between the unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer patients who received chemotherapy.

METHODS: Patients who were treated with gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in the previous prospective studies were divided into groups of unresectable and recurrent cases. The tumor response, time-to-progression, overall survival, toxicity, and dose intensity were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS: Response rate of the recurrent group was higher than that of the unresectable group (40.0% vs 25.5%; P = 0.34). Median time-to-progression of the recurrent and unresectable groups were 8.7 mo (95%CI), 1.2 mo, not reached) and 5.7 mo (95%CI: 4.0-7.0 mo), respectively (P = 0.14). Median overall survival of the recurrent and the unresectable groups were 16.1 mo (95%CI: 2.0 mo-not reached) and 9.6 mo (95%CI: 7.1-11.7 mo), respectively (P = 0.10). Dose intensities were significantly lower in the recurrent groups (gemcitabine: recurrent group 83.5% vs unresectable group 96.8%; P < 0.01, S-1: Recurrent group 75.9% vs unresectable group 91.8%; P < 0.01). Neutropenia occurred more frequently in recurrent group (recurrent group 90% vs unresectable group 55%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: Not only the efficacy but also the toxicity and dose intensity were significantly different between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer: a systematic review

The randomized NCRN phase III ABC-02 trial provided level-A evidence for first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine combination in advanced biliary cancer (ABC). This systematic literature review aims to evaluate the level of evidence for the use of second-line chemotherapy for patients with ABC in terms of overall survival (OS), response, toxicity and quality of life. Eligible studies were identified using Medline, ASCO, ESMO and the World Gastrointestinal Congress databases. Searches were last updated on 15 December 2013. Eligible studies reported survival and/or response data for patients with ABC receiving second-line systemic chemotherapy. This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database (No. CRD42013004205). Five hundred and fifty-eight studies were identified from the searches in Medline (n = 342), ASCO (n = 160), ESMO (n = 27) and World Gastrointestinal Congress (n = 29). Twenty-five studies were eligible: 14 phase II clinical trials, 9 retrospective analyses and 2 case reports. In total, data from 761 patients were reported with median number of patients included in each study of 22 (range 9-96). The mean OS was 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-8.2] [phase II: 6.6 (95% CI 5.1-8.1); retrospective analysis: 7.7 (95% CI 6.5-8.9)]. The mean progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and disease control rate were 3.2 months (95% CI 2.7-3.7), 7.7% (95% CI 4.6-10.9) and 49.5% (95% CI 41.4-57.7), respectively. The best correlations were between OS and PFS for all studies (r = 0.54; P = 0.01) and between OS and PFS (r = 0.61; P = 0.04) and OS and RR (r = 0.62; P = 0.03) for phase II studies, respectively. Biliary tract cancer is known to be a chemo-responsive disease. There is insufficient evidence (level C) to recommend a second-line chemotherapy schedule in ABC, although the available data suggest that a cohort of patients may benefit. Further prospective and randomized studies are needed to clarify the relative value of second-line chemotherapy in this setting.

Polymeric photosensitizer-embedded self-expanding metal stent for repeatable endoscopic photodynamic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new therapeutic approach for the palliative treatment of malignant bile duct obstruction. In this study, we designed photosensitizer-embedded self-expanding nonvascular metal stent (PDT-stent) which allows repeatable photodynamic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma without systemic injection of photosensitizer. Polymeric photosensitizer (pullulan acetate-conjugated pheophorbide A; PPA) was incorporated in self-expanding nonvascular metal stent. Residence of PPA in the stent was estimated in buffer solution and subcutaneous implantation on mouse. Photodynamic activity of PDT-stent was evaluated through laserexposure on stent-layered tumor cell lines, HCT-116 tumor-xenograft mouse models and endoscopic intervention of PDT-stent on bile duct of mini pigs. Photo-fluorescence imaging of the PDT-stent demonstrated homogeneous embedding of polymeric Pheo-A (PPA) on stent membrane. PDT-stent sustained its photodynamic activities at least for 2 month. And which implies repeatable endoscopic PDT is possible after stent emplacement. The PDT-stent after light exposure successfully generated cytotoxic singlet oxygen in the surrounding tissues, inducing apoptotic degradation of tumor cells and regression of xenograft tumors on mouse models. Endoscopic biliary in-stent photodynamic treatments on minipigs also suggested the potential efficacy of PDT-stent on cholangiocarcinoma. In vivo and in vitro studies revealed our PDT-stent, allows repeatable endoscopic biliary PDT, has the potential for the combination therapy (stent plus PDT) of cholangiocarcinoma.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is a standard chemotherapy option for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We compared the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) versus GP in advanced BTC.

METHODS

The records of all patients treated with GP or XP chemotherapy for unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent BTC at the National Cancer Center between December 2001 and August 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with histologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled.

RESULTS

Of the 344 patients enrolled, 127 received GP and 217 received XP. At a median follow-up time of 8.9 months, the median time to progression was longer in the GP group than in the XP group (5.6 vs. 4.7 months), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.081). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.4 months (95% CI 6.2-10.7) in the GP group and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.8-8.7) in the XP group (p = 0.024), with statistical significance retained following multivariate analysis (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.527-0.987; p = 0.004). Grade 3/4 toxicities were significantly more frequent in the GP group than in the XP group (40.9 vs. 24.9%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

GP was superior to XP in prolonging OS, despite increasing the rate of grade 3/4 adverse events.

A retrospective study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the treatment outcome of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who were refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. The tumor response and disease control rates were 1.7 and 58.3%, respectively. The median overall survival and time to progression were 6.7 months (95% CI 4.9-8.1) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.5-5.0), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (20%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (17%), nausea (2%), anorexia (2%), and liver dysfunction (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy showed moderate efficacy and safety as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer that is refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy.

Current status of chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer

Chemotherapy is indispensable for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Recently, reports regarding first-line chemotherapy have increased, and first-line chemotherapy treatment has become gradually more sophisticated. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy (or gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination therapy) have become the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancer. Oral fluoropyrimidines have also been shown to have good antitumor effects. Gemcitabine, platinum compounds, and oral fluoropyrimidines are now considered key drugs for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Several clinical trials using molecular targeted agents are also ongoing. Combination therapy using cytotoxic agents and molecular-targeted agents has been evaluated widely. However, reports regarding second-line chemotherapy remain limited, and it has not yet been clarified whether second-line chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish second-line standard chemotherapy treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer. Several problems exist when assessing the results of previous reports concerning advanced biliary tract cancer. In the present review, the current status of the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer is summarized, and several associated problems are indicated. These problems should be solved to achieve more sophisticated treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.