Focal autoimmune pancreatitis: Radiological characteristics help to distinguish from pancreatic cancer

Malignancy and mass-forming phenotypes of IgG4-related disease: a challenging diagnosis

Mass-forming phenotypes of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) mimic malignancy and histological confirmation can be challenging. A woman in her 70s with HIV infection presented with painless obstructive jaundice and weight loss. Magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Tumour markers and serum IgG4 were normal. Percutaneous liver biopsy was consistent with IgG4-RD inflammatory pseudotumour, with complete response to glucocorticoid therapy. Two years later, a new episode of obstructive jaundice occurred, with CT showing a solid lesion in the head of the pancreas with double duct sign and encasement of the portal vein. Re-induction therapy was tried without response. Fine-needle biopsy was consistent with pancreatic cancer. Supportive care was offered and the patient died 8 months later, with no signs of disease progression on subsequent imaging. We discuss the challenges of IgG4-RD diagnosis and treatment and the differential diagnosis between mass-forming phenotypes and malignancy, highlighting the difficulties in managing such patients.

Quantitative MR imaging biomarkers for distinguishing inflammatory pancreatic mass and pancreatic cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers in distinguishing between inflammatory pancreatic masses (IPM) and pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through August 2023. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the risk of bias and applicability of the studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Univariate meta-regression analysis was used to identify the potential factors of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis. The two main types of IPM, mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP) and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), differ in their apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Compared with PC, the ADC value was higher in MFP but lower in AIP. The pooled sensitivity/specificity of ADC were 0.80/0.85 for distinguishing MFP from PC and 0.82/0.84 for distinguishing AIP from PC. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for the maximal diameter of the upstream main pancreatic duct (dMPD) was 0.86/0.74, with a cutoff of dMPD ≤ 4 mm, and 0.97/0.52, with a cutoff of dMPD ≤ 5 mm. The pooled sensitivity/specificity for perfusion fraction (f) was 0.82/0.68, and 0.82/0.77 for mass stiffness values.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative MR imaging biomarkers are useful in distinguishing between IPM and PC. ADC values differ between MFP and AIP, and they should be separated for consideration in future studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Quantitative MR parameters could serve as non-invasive imaging biomarkers for differentiating malignant pancreatic neoplasms from inflammatory masses of the pancreas, and hence help to avoid unnecessary surgery.

KEY POINTS

• Several quantitative MR imaging biomarkers performed well in differential diagnosis between inflammatory pancreatic mass and pancreatic cancer. • The ADC value could discern pancreatic cancer from mass-forming pancreatitis or autoimmune pancreatitis, if the two inflammatory mass types are not combined. • The diameter of main pancreatic duct had the highest specificity for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma using CT characteristics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine informational CT findings for distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to review their diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

A systematic and detailed literature review was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. Similar descriptors to embody the identical image finding were labeled as a single CT characteristic. We calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of each CT characteristic using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 145 various descriptors from 15 studies (including 562 AIP and 869 PDAC patients) were categorized into 16 CT characteristics. According to the pooled DOR, 16 CT characteristics were classified into three groups (suggesting AIP, suggesting PDAC, and not informational). Seven characteristics suggesting AIP were diffuse pancreatic enlargement (DOR, 48), delayed homogeneous enhancement (DOR, 46), capsule-like rim (DOR, 34), multiple pancreatic masses (DOR, 16), renal involvement (DOR, 15), retroperitoneal fibrosis (DOR, 13), and bile duct involvement (DOR, 8). Delayed homogeneous enhancement showed a pooled sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 85%. The other six characteristics showed relatively low sensitivity (12-63%) but high specificity (93-99%). Four characteristics suggesting PDAC were discrete pancreatic mass (DOR, 23), pancreatic duct cutoff (DOR, 16), upstream main pancreatic duct dilatation (DOR, 8), and upstream parenchymal atrophy (DOR, 7).

CONCLUSION

Eleven CT characteristics were informational to distinguish AIP from PDAC. Diffuse pancreatic enlargement, delayed homogeneous enhancement, and capsule-like rim suggested AIP with the highest DORs, whereas discrete pancreatic mass suggested PDAC. However, pooled sensitivities of informational CT characteristics were moderate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This meta-analysis underscores eleven distinctive CT characteristics that aid in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma, potentially preventing misdiagnoses in patients presenting with focal/diffuse pancreatic enlargement.

KEY POINTS

• Diffuse pancreatic enlargement (pooled diagnostic odds ratio [DOR], 48), delayed homogeneous enhancement (46), and capsule-like rim (34) were CT characteristics suggesting autoimmune pancreatitis. • The CT characteristics suggesting autoimmune pancreatitis, except delayed homogeneous enhancement, had a general tendency to show relatively low sensitivity (12-63%) but high specificity (93-99%). • Discrete pancreatic mass (pooled diagnostic odds ratio, 23) was the CT characteristic suggesting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with the highest pooled DORs.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for differentiating mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP) or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presented similar clinical symptoms, but required different treatment approaches and had different survival outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in differentiating MFP from PDAC.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu (VIP), and WanFang databases to identify original studies published from inception to August 20, 2021. Studies reporting the diagnostic performances of CEUS and CECT for differentiating MFP from PDAC were included. The meta-analysis was performed with Stata 15.0 software. The outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves of CEUS and CECT. Meta-regression was conducted to investigate heterogeneity. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to indirectly compare the overall diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies with 2115 pancreatic masses were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for MFP were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%; I2  = 0.00%) and 95% (95% CI, 90%-97%; I2  = 63.44%), respectively; the overall +LR, -LR, and DOR values were 15.12 (95% CI, 7.61-30.01), 0.19 (95% CI, 0.13-0.29), and 78.91 (95% CI, 30.94-201.27), respectively; and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-92). However, the overall sensitivity and specificity of CECT were 81% (95% CI, 75-85%; I2  = 66.37%) and 94% (95% CI, 90-96%; I2  = 74.87%); the overall +LR, -LR, and DOR values were 12.91 (95% CI, 7.86-21.20), 0.21 (95% CI, 0.16-0.27), and 62.53 (95% CI, 34.45-113.51), respectively; and, the SROC AUC was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94). The overall diagnostic accuracy of CEUS was comparable to that of CECT for the differential diagnosis of MFP and PDAC (relative DOR 1.26, 95% CI [0.42-3.83], P  > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS and CECT have comparable diagnostic performance for differentiating MFP from PDAC, and should be considered as mutually complementary diagnostic tools for suspected focal pancreatic lesions.

A CT based radiomics nomogram for differentiation between focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an CT-based radiomics nomogram for the preoperative differentiation of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

96 patients with focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have been enrolled in the study (32 and 64 cases respectively). All cases have been confirmed by imaging, clinical follow-up and/or pathology. The imaging data were considered as: 70% training cohort and 30% test cohort. Pancreatic lesions have been manually delineated by two radiologists and image segmentation was performed to extract radiomic features from the CT images. Independent-sample T tests and LASSO regression were used for feature selection. The training cohort was classified using a variety of machine learning-based classifiers, and 5-fold cross-validation has been performed. The classification performance was evaluated using the test cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to develop a radiomics nomogram model, containing the CT findings and Rad-Score. Calibration curves have been plotted showing the agreement between the predicted and actual probabilities of the radiomics nomogram model. Different patients have been selected to test and evaluate the model prediction process. Finally, receiver operating characteristic curves and decision curves were plotted, and the radiomics nomogram model was compared with a single model to visually assess its diagnostic ability.

Results

A total of 158 radiomics features were extracted from each image. 7 features were selected to construct the radiomics model, then a variety of classifiers were used for classification and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) was selected to be the optimal classifier. Combining CT findings with radiomics model, a prediction model based on CT findings and radiomics was finally obtained. The nomogram model showed a good sensitivity and specificity with AUCs of 0.87 and 0.83 in training and test cohorts, respectively. The areas under the curve and decision curve analysis showed that the radiomics nomogram model may provide better diagnostic performance than the single model and achieve greater clinical net benefits than the CT finding model and radiomics signature model individually.

Conclusions

The CT image-based radiomics nomogram model can accurately distinguish between focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients and provide additional clinical benefits.

Diagnostic value of imaging examination in autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis mediated by autoimmunity factors. It can be divided into two categories according to pathological characteristics: Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis. In the clinical setting, the imaging manifestations of some AIP cases are atypical, so it is difficult to distinguish it from general pancreatitis, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, and other malignant disorders. Most importantly, the treatment for and prognosis of these diseases are different. Therefore, a timely correct imaging diagnosis of AIP is key for AIP patients. After that, clinicians can take appropriate treatment measures for those patients, which is helpful for the prognosis of AIP.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI features for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To identify reliable MRI features for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to summarize their diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify original articles published between January 2006 and July 2021. The pooled diagnostic accuracy, including the diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the identified features, was calculated using a bivariate random effects model.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, and 92 overlapping descriptors were subsumed under 16 MRI features. Ten features favoring AIP were diffuse enlargement (DOR, 75; 95% CI, 9-594), capsule-like rim (DOR, 52; 95% CI, 20-131), multiple main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures (DOR, 47; 95% CI, 17-129), homogeneous delayed enhancement (DOR, 46; 95% CI, 21-104), low apparent diffusion coefficient value (DOR, 30), speckled enhancement (DOR, 30), multiple pancreatic masses (DOR, 29), tapered narrowing of MPD (DOR, 15), penetrating duct sign (DOR, 14), and delayed enhancement (DOR, 13). Six features favoring PDAC were target type enhancement (DOR, 41; 95% CI, 11-158), discrete pancreatic mass (DOR, 35; 95% CI, 15-80), upstream MPD dilatation (DOR, 13), peripancreatic fat infiltration (DOR, 10), upstream parenchymal atrophy (DOR, 5), and vascular involvement (DOR, 3).

CONCLUSION

This study identified 16 informative MRI features to differentiate AIP from PDAC. Among them, diffuse enlargement, capsule-like rim, multiple MPD strictures, and homogeneous delayed enhancement favored AIP with the highest DORs, whereas discrete mass and target type enhancement favored PDAC.

KEY POINTS

• The MRI features with the highest pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) for autoimmune pancreatitis were diffuse enlargement of the pancreas (75), capsule-like rim (52), multiple strictures of the main pancreatic duct (47), and homogeneous delayed enhancement (46). • The MRI features with the highest pooled DORs for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were target type enhancement (41) and discrete pancreatic mass (35).

Diffuse Involvement of Pancreas is not Always Autoimmune Pancreatitis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of diffuse involvement of pancreas and to identify the findings of malignancies using enhancement computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,0249 patients performed enhancement CT in our hospital over 62 months were investigated and the final study cohort includes 245 patients (170 males, 75 females; mean age, 56.94 ± 12.17 years). The reference standard is the final clinical/pathological diagnosis. The lesion-to-aorta enhancement ratio (LAR) on the pancreatic arterial phase, portal phase and delayed phase (DP) and the traditional CT findings were evaluated. Intergroup comparisons between malignancies and non-malignancies lesions were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify findings predicting malignancies.

RESULTS

The prevalence of malignancy was 45.3% (111/245) of diffuse enlargement of pancreas. All benign lesions were autoimmune pancreatitis 54.7% (n = 134). The most common malignant lesion was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 88, 35.9%). Other rare lesions with malignant potential included pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (n = 11, 4.5%), lymphoma (n = 4, 1.6%), metastasis (n = 4, 1.6%), solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (n = 3, 1.2%) and acinar cell carcinoma (n = 1, 0.4%). Residual normal pancreas parenchyma, heterogeneity, short axis (cut-off value, 3.15 cm) and LARDP (cut-off value, 0.75) were independent predictors of malignancies. When the above predictors were combined, a sensitivity of 94.2%, a specificity of 90.8% were attained.

CONCLUSION

Diffuse involvement of the pancreas is rare and is not a specific sign of autoimmune pancreatitis, and it is associated with a wide spectrum of malignant conditions. Dynamic enhancement CT is helpful to identifying malignancies.

Stocky/Packed Pancreas: A Case of Focal Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis Mimicking Cancer

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIP) is a recognised but underreported entity in the literature. Immunotherapy drugs have been described as one possible emerging cause, although the pathogenic mechanism is still largely unclear. To date, only a few cases have been reported, even if in recent times there is an over-increasing awareness of this pathologic entity. The imaging-based diagnosis of DIP can be difficult to establish, representing a real challenge for a radiologist, especially when the inflammatory disease appears as a focal mass suspicious for a malignancy. Case report: We herein report the case of a 71-year-old man with a known history of partially responsive lung adenocarcinoma subtype with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, who underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging follow-up after one year of immunotherapy. The exam revealed a stocky/packed lesion in the pancreatic body, with increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation highly suggestive of pancreatic cancer, which finally was proven to be a DIP induced by immunotherapy. Conclusion: Distinguishing between focal DIP and pancreatic neoplasm is, therefore, crucial for timely therapeutic management and prognostic stratification. A deep knowledge of possible imaging pitfalls coupled with a comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessment is pivotal to avoid any delays in diagnosis.

Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Solid Tumors with a Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses: A Prospective Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Image evaluation of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) and additional time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis enable qualitative and quantitative analyses of pancreatic tumor based on real-time perfusion imaging.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of CEH-EUS with a combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses of pancreatic solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients were scheduled to undergo EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for pancreatic solid tumors were prospectively enrolled between 11/2016 and 12/2018 and underwent CEH-EUS. The vascular and enhancement patterns were qualitatively evaluated and heterogeneous enhancement was defined to be indicative of malignancy. The echo intensity change during 60 s in the tumor was quantitatively evaluated by time intensity curve analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 100 patients were enrolled in this study. The final diagnoses were malignant lesions in 87 patients and benign legions in 13 patients. There were four categories of enhancement and patterns: hypovascular with heterogeneous, hypovascular with homogeneous, hypervascular heterogeneous, and hypervascular homogeneous enhancement. The diagnostic capability of qualitative analysis was the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 62%, and 85%, respectively. With respect to time intensity curve analysis, the time to peak of malignant lesions was significantly shorter than those of benign lesions (P = 0.0009) with an optimal cutoff value of 12.81 s on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. With the combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were improved to 100%, 54%, and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEH-EUS with combined qualitative and quantitative analyses for pancreatic tumors might be useful as a complement for EUS-FNA. The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000025192).

Surgery for chronic pancreatitis in Finland is rare but seems to produce good long-term results

BACKGROUND

Abdominal pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP) may require invasive interventions. Surgical procedures are rare, and little is known about the long-term results.

AIM

To study the nationwide frequency of pancreatic surgery for CP in Finland, and postoperative symptoms and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

All patients in Finland with a diagnosis of CP who had undergone pancreatic surgery during 2000-2008 were selected from a national register. Only patients with CP as an indication for pancreatic surgery were included. Medical records were studied and questionnaires QLQ-C30, PAN26 and AUDIT, and symptom questionnaires were sent out.

RESULTS

During the 9-year period, pancreatic surgery for CP was performed on 30 patients [77% men, median age 45 (21-62) years]. Eighty-three percent underwent endoscopic procedures before surgery. Surgery was performed a median 2 (0-10) years after the original CP diagnosis, and 17% developed postoperative complications. Primary pain relief after surgery was reported in 70% of cases. Need for strong pain medication was lower after surgery. Eight of 21 (38%) returned the questionnaires and 88% reported that surgery had reduced their pain and 63% were almost or entirely pain-free at a median 14 (10-18) years after surgery. QoL results did not differ from those in our control Finnish CP group.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for CP is rare in Finland and most patients had prior endoscopic procedures. Patients who returned the questionnaires reported less pain and good QoL during the 14-year follow-up.

Use of MRI signal intensity ratio to differentiate between autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of the lesion-to-erector spinae signal intensity ratio (SIR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRI data of 21 patients with AIP and 27 patients with PDA were analysed retrospectively, and the signal intensity in pancreatic lesions and erector spinae muscles at the same level on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), arterial phase (AP) imaging, and delayed phase (DP) imaging was measured for calculation of SIRs.

RESULTS

The mean SIRs of the pancreatic lesions and erector spinae from T2WI, AP, and DP images of AIP patients were 0.96, 1.27, and 1.42, respectively, while those of PDA patients were 1.35, 0.80, and 0.91, respectively. The differences in the SIRs between the AIP and PDA groups were statistically significant (p<0.001), with corresponding area under curve (AUC) values of 0.925, 0.906, and 0.961, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for the SIRs on T2WI, AP and DP images were 1.21, 1.01, and 1.08, respectively. SIR values < 1.21 on T2WI, >1.01 on AP imaging, and >1.08 on DP imaging identified AIP with sensitivities of 85.7%, 90.5%, and 90.5%, respectively, and specificities of 81.5%, 74.6%, and 81.5%, respectively. The AUC values for SIRs did not differ significantly between T2WI and DP imaging or AP and DP imaging (Z = 0.778, p=0.436; Z = 1.279, p=0.201).

CONCLUSION

The SIRs of pancreatic lesions and erector spinae on T2WI, AP, and DP images can be used to differentiate AIP from PDA.

Korean clinical practice guideline for pancreatic cancer 2021: A summary of evidence-based, multi-disciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approaches

Pancreatic cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death in Korea. To enable standardization of management and facilitate improvements in outcome, a total of 53 multi-disciplinary experts in gastroenterology, surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine, and pathology in Korea developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date, evidence-based research findings and expert opinions. Recommendations were made on imaging diagnosis, endoscopic management, surgery, radiotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, and specific management procedures, including neoadjuvant treatment or adjuvant treatment for patients with resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. This is the English version of the Korean clinical practice guideline for pancreatic cancer 2021. This guideline includes 20 clinical questions and 32 statements. This guideline represents the most standard guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in adults at this time in Korea. The authors believe that this guideline will provide useful and informative advice.

Multifocal autoimmune pancreatitis: A retrospective study in a single tertiary center of 26 patients with a 20-year literature review

BACKGROUND

Multifocal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), sometimes forming multiple pancreatic masses, is frequently misdiagnosed as pancreatic malignancy in routine clinical practice. It is critical to know the imaging features of multifocal-type AIP to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgery. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies evaluating the value of diffusionweighted imaging (DWI), axial fat-suppressed T1 weighted image (T1WI), and dynamic contrast enhanced-computed tomography (DCE-CT) in detecting the lesions of multifocal-type AIP.

AIM

To clarify the exact prevalence and radiological findings of multifocal AIP in our cohorts and compare the sensitivity of DWI, axial fat-suppressed T1WI, and DCE-CT for detecting AIP lesions. We also compared radiological features between multifocal AIP and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with several key imaging landmarks.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with proven multifocal AIP were retrospectively included. Two blinded independent radiologists rated their confidence level in detecting the lesions on a 5-point scale and assessed the diagnostic performance of DWI, axial fat-suppressed T1WI, and DCE-CT. CT and magnetic resonance imaging of multifocal AIP were systematically reviewed for typical imaging findings and compared with the key imaging features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Among 118 patients with AIP, 26 (22.0%) had multiple lesions (56 lesions). Ulcerative colitis was associated with multifocal AIP in 7.7% (2/26) of patients, and Crohn’s disease was present in 15.3% (4/26) of patients. In multifocal AIP, multiple lesions, delayed homogeneous enhancement, multifocal strictures of the main pancreatic duct, capsule-like rim, lower apparent diffusion coefficient values, and elevated serum Ig4 level were observed significantly more frequently than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas the presence of capsule-like rim in multifocal-type AIP was lower in frequency than total AIP. Of these lesions of multifocal AIP, DWI detected 89.3% (50/56) and 82.1% (46/56) by the senior and junior radiologist, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Multifocal AIP is not as rare as previously thought and was seen in 22.0% of our patients. The diagnostic performance of DWI for detecting multifocal AIP was best followed by axial fat-suppressed T1WI and DCE-CT.

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient value in the diagnosis of localized type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and evaluation of response to steroids

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of localized autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the evaluation of response to steroids.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with localized AIP and 71 patients with PDAC who underwent abdominal MRI with DWI (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm²). Their ADC values at the lesion sites and five MRI findings useful for diagnosing AIP were evaluated. In addition, ADC values before and after steroid therapy were compared in 28 patients with localized AIP.

RESULTS

The median ADC value was significantly lower for localized AIP than for PDAC (1.057 × 10^-3 vs 1.376 × 10^-3 mm²/s, P < 0.001). In the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.957 and optimal cut-off value of ADC for differentiating localized AIP from PDAC was 1.188 × 10^-3 mm²/s. ADC value ≤ 1.188 × 10^-3 mm²/s showed the highest sensitivity and accuracy among the MRI findings (92.6% and 90.7%, respectively), and when combined with one or more other MRI findings, showed 96.3% specificity. The median ADC values before and after steroid therapy (mean 7.9 days) were 1.061 × 10^-3 and 1.340 × 10^-3 mm²/s, respectively, and ADC values were significantly elevated after steroid induction (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The measurement of ADC values was useful for the differential diagnosis of localized AIP and PDAC and for the early determination of the effect of steroid therapy.

Comparison of five-phase computed tomography images of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: Emphasis on cases with atypical images

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

International consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) include characteristic images of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP); however, reports on atypical cases are increasing. The aims of this study were to compare CT findings between AIP and pancreatic cancer (PC), and to analyze type 1 AIPs showing atypical images.

METHODS

Five-phase CT images were compared between 80 type 1-AIP lesions and 80 size- and location-matched PCs in the case-control study. Atypical AIPs were diagnosed based on the four ICDC items.

RESULTS

ICDC items were recognized in most AIP lesions; pancreatic enlargement (87.7%), narrowing of the main pancreatic duct (98.8%), delayed enhancement (100%), and no marked upstream-duct dilation (97.5%). CT values of AIPs increased rapidly until the pancreatic phase and decreased afterward, while those of PCs gradually increased until the delayed phase (P < 0.0001). Atypical images were recognized in 14.8% of AIPs, commonly without pancreatic enlargement (18.5 mm) and sometimes mimicking intraductal neoplasms. The CT values and their ratios were different between atypical AIPs and size-matched PCs most significantly in the pancreatic phase, but similar in the delayed phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Ordinary type 1 AIPs can be diagnosed with the ICDC, but atypical AIPs represented a small fraction. "Delayed enhancement" is characteristic to ordinary AIPs, however, "pancreatic-phase enhancement" is more diagnostic for atypical AIPs.

Eosinophilic pancreatitis: a review of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Eosinophilic pancreatitis (EP) is an extremely rare disease caused by purely eosinophilic infiltration of the pancreas. EP is prone to being misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer, causing unnecessary economic and physical harm to the patient. We report three cases of EP that were cured by steroids without relapse from 2017 to now. The clinical data of the three patients, including clinical manifestations, serological manifestations, imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, and MRI), pathological diagnosis and treatment, and telephone follow-up of all patients, were retrospectively analysed. In addition, a literature search was conducted on the Web of Science and PubMed databases using key terms related to EP, considering case reports with no restrictions on the date of publication or language. In conclusion, we analysed 19 cases and determined the diagnostic criteria for EP. The diagnostic algorithm for EP can be used to diagnose EP easily. We hope that our standards and algorithm can reduce the rate of misdiagnosis and contribute to clinical diagnosis and treatment. In addition, we expect to evaluate more EP cases to test our diagnostic criteria and design a systematic diagnostic flow chart.

Focal Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Simple Flow Chart for a Challenging Diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a chronic fibroinflammatory autoimmune mediated disease of the pancreas. Clinically, obstructive painless jaundice and upper abdominal pain are the main symptoms. Focal AIP is characterized by segmental involvement of pancreatic parenchyma and it is often radiologically represented by a pancreatic mass. In these cases, the diagnosis can be very challenging, since it may be easily confused with pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we suggest a combined approach of imaging tests as the diagnostic workup. EUS study combined with CEUS and elastography, if available, increases the accuracy of the method to rule out cancer. Moreover, the lesion should always be sampled under EUS guidance to obtain a cyto/histological diagnosis. The diagnostic workup should also include the use of diagnostic clinical criteria (extrapancreatic lesions, steroid response) and laboratory findings (CA 19.9 and IgG4 evaluations).

Imaging diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic phenotype of IgG4-related systemic disease. Since its first description in the literature, characteristic imaging features have gradually become known to many clinicians encompassing various specialties in the past quarter century. CT and MRI have been the workhorses for imaging diagnosis of AIP. Typical features include sausage-like swelling of the focal or entire pancreas, duct-penetrating sign, a capsule-like rim of the affected lesions, and homogeneous delayed enhancement or enhanced duct sign after contrast administration, as well as characteristic combined findings reflecting coexisting pathologies in the other organs as a systemic disease. In this review, recent and future developments in CT and MRI that may help diagnose AIP are discussed, including restricted diffusion and perfusion and increased elasticity measured using MR.

Meta-analysis of CT and MRI for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To systematically determine the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a comparison between the two imaging modalities.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify original articles published between 2009 and 2019 reporting the diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for differentiating AIP from PDAC. The meta-analytic sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI were calculated, and compared using a bivariate random effects model. Subgroup analysis for differentiating focal AIP from PDAC was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 856 articles screened, 11 eligible articles are remained, i.e., five studies for CT, four for MRI, and two for both. The meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity of CT were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-75%) and 99% (95% CI, 88-100%), respectively, while those of MRI were 84% (95% CI, 68-93%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%). MRI had a significantly higher meta-analytic summary sensitivity than CT (84% vs. 59%, p = 0.02) but a similar specificity (97% vs. 99%, p = 0.18). In the subgroup analysis for focal AIP, the sensitivity for distinguishing between focal AIP and PDAC was lower than that for the overall analysis. MRI had a higher sensitivity than CT (76% vs. 50%, p = 0.28) but a similar specificity (97% vs. 98%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

MRI might be clinically more useful to evaluate patients with AIP, particularly for differentiating AIP from PDAC.

KEY POINTS

• MRI had an overall good diagnostic performance to differentiate AIP from PDAC with a meta-analytic summary estimate of 83% for sensitivity and of 97% for specificity. • CT had a very high specificity (99%), but a suboptimal sensitivity (59%) for differentiating AIP from PDAC. • Compared with CT, MRI had a higher sensitivity, but a similar specificity.

Distinguishing pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis with in vivo tomoelastography

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively investigate the stiffness and fluidity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) with tomoelastography, and to evaluate its diagnostic performance in distinguishing the two entities.

METHODS

Tomoelastography provided high-resolution maps of shear wave speed (c in m/s) and phase angle (φ in rad), allowing mechanical characterization of the stiffness and fluidity properties of the pancreas. Forty patients with untreated PDAC and 33 patients with untreated AIP who underwent diagnostic pancreatic MRI at 3-T together with multifrequency MR elastography and tomoelastography data processing were prospectively enrolled. Ten healthy volunteers served as controls. Two radiologists and a technician measured pancreatic stiffness and fluidity independently. The two radiologists also independently evaluated the patients' conventional MR sequences using the following diagnostic score: 1, definitely PDAC; 2, probably PDAC; 3, indeterminate; 4, probably AIP; and 5, definitely AIP. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Stiffness and fluidity of PDAC, AIP, and healthy pancreas, as well as diagnostic performance of tomoelastography and conventional MRI, were compared.

RESULTS

AIP showed significantly lower stiffness and fluidity than PDAC and significantly higher stiffness and fluidity than healthy pancreas. Pancreatic fluidity was not influenced by secondary obstructive changes. The intraclass correlation coefficient for pancreatic stiffness and fluidity by the 3 readers was near-perfect (0.951-0.979, all p < 0.001). Both stiffness and fluidity allowed distinguishing PDAC from AIP. AUCs were 0.906 for stiffness, 0.872 for fluidity, and 0.842 for conventional MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic stiffness and fluidity both allow differentiation of PDAC and AIP with high accuracy.

KEY POINTS

• AIP showed significantly lower stiffness and fluidity than PDAC and significantly higher stiffness and fluidity than healthy pancreas. • Both stiffness and fluidity allowed distinguishing PDAC from AIP. • Pancreatic fluidity could distinguish malignancy from non-malignant secondary obstructive changes.

Inflammatory mimickers of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can be a difficult imaging diagnosis early in its course given its subtle imaging findings such as focal pancreatic duct dilatation, abrupt duct cut-off, and encasement of vasculature. A variety of pancreatitidies have imaging findings that mimic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and lead to mass formation making diagnosis even more difficult on imaging alone. These conditions include acute focal pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and paraduodenal ("groove") pancreatitis. This review will focus on imaging findings that can help differentiate these inflammatory processes from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Differentiation of focal autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an inflammatory process of the pancreas that occurs most commonly in elderly males and clinically can mimic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and present with jaundice, weight loss, and abdominal pain. Mass-forming lesions in the pancreas are seen in the focal form of AIP and both clinical and imaging findings can overlap those of pancreatic cancer. The accurate distinction of AIP from pancreatic cancer is of utmost importance as it means avoiding unnecessary surgery in AIP cases or inaccurate steroid treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Imaging concomitantly with serological examinations (IgG4 and Ca 19-9) plays an important role in the distinction between these entities. Characteristic extra-pancreatic manifestations as well as favorable good response to treatment with steroids are characteristic of AIP. This paper will review current diagnostic parameters useful in differentiating between focal AIP and pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Diagnostic imaging guide for autoimmune pancreatitis

The International Consensus Diagnosis Criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been published internationally for the diagnosis of AIP. However, since the revisions in 2006 and 2011, the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis 2018 have been published. The criteria were revised based the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria 2011, and included descriptions of characteristic imaging findings such as (1) pancreatic enlargement and (2) distinctive narrowing of the main pancreatic duct. In addition, pancreatic duct images obtained by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography as well as conventional endoscopic retrograde pancreatography were newly adopted. The guideline explains some characteristic imaging findings, but does not contain descriptions of the imaging methods, such as detailed imaging parameters and optimal timings of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. It is a matter of concern that imaging methods can vary from hospital to hospital. Although other characteristic findings have been reported, these findings were not described in the guideline. The present paper describes the imaging methods for obtaining optimal images and the characteristic imaging findings with the aim of standardizing image quality and improving diagnostic accuracy when radiologists diagnose AIP in actual clinical settings.

Differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with CT radiomics features

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether computed tomography (CT)-based machine learning of radiomics features could help distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with AIP (65 men, 24 women; mean age, 59.7±13.9 [SD] years; range: 21-83 years) and 93 patients with PDAC (68 men, 25 women; mean age, 60.1±12.3 [SD] years; range: 36-86 years) were retrospectively included. All patients had dedicated dual-phase pancreatic protocol CT between 2004 and 2018. Thin-slice images (0.75/0.5mm thickness/increment) were compared with thick-slices images (3 or 5mm thickness/increment). Pancreatic regions involved by PDAC or AIP (areas of enlargement, altered enhancement, effacement of pancreatic duct) as well as uninvolved parenchyma were segmented as three-dimensional volumes. Four hundred and thirty-one radiomics features were extracted and a random forest was used to distinguish AIP from PDAC. CT data of 60 AIP and 60 PDAC patients were used for training and those of 29 AIP and 33 PDAC independent patients were used for testing.

RESULTS

The pancreas was diffusely involved in 37 (37/89; 41.6%) patients with AIP and not diffusely in 52 (52/89; 58.4%) patients. Using machine learning, 95.2% (59/62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.8-100%), 83.9% (52:67; 95% CI: 74.7-93.0%) and 77.4% (48/62; 95% CI: 67.0-87.8%) of the 62 test patients were correctly classified as either having PDAC or AIP with thin-slice venous phase, thin-slice arterial phase, and thick-slice venous phase CT, respectively. Three of the 29 patients with AIP (3/29; 10.3%) were incorrectly classified as having PDAC but all 33 patients with PDAC (33/33; 100%) were correctly classified with thin-slice venous phase with 89.7% sensitivity (26/29; 95% CI: 78.6-100%) and 100% specificity (33/33; 95% CI: 93-100%) for the diagnosis of AIP, 95.2% accuracy (59/62; 95% CI: 89.8-100%) and area under the curve of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.936-1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomic features help differentiate AIP from PDAC with an overall accuracy of 95.2%.

CT and MR features that can help to differentiate between focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

Diagnosis of a focal pancreatic mass in routine clinical practice can be a challenge because patients with chronic pancreatitis may present with symptoms and imaging findings that can be difficult to distinguish from pancreatic cancer. Markers, such as cancer antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen, are helpful if abnormal, but normal values do not rule out pancreatic cancer. One of the strongest complicating factors is that chronic pancreatitis is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Transition of chronic pancreatitis to pancreatic cancer is relatively rare, but it normally has a poor prognosis because diagnosis is often delayed. From a radiologic diagnosis perspective, the classic so-called double-duct sign is helpful. This sign is considered a hallmark sign of pancreatic cancer on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, but it can also be identified in patients with chronic pancreatitis or with other conditions. A number of additional imaging findings or signs are, therefore, necessary. The aim of this article was to describe the strong CT and MR imaging features or integrated imaging features that can help to differentiate between pancreatic cancer and focal chronic pancreatitis.

Follicular pancreatitis: A rare pancreatic inflammatory pseudotumor

Inflammatory pseudotumors imitate neoplasms on imaging but actually represent focal inflammation. We report a case of follicular pancreatitis, which is a recently recognized distinct form of mass-forming focal chronic pancreatitis pathologically characterized by lymphoid infiltration with abundant reactive germinal centers. In our patient, follicular pancreatitis manifested as a pancreatic tail mass that was resected due to imaging findings, which were suggestive of pancreatic malignancy. We performed a literature review of this rare condition and present a summary of reported imaging findings. The most distinguishing feature from pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the enhancement pattern, as follicular pancreatitis enhances more than the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma on delayed post-contrast images which is unusual for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. If this benign diagnosis is suggested on imaging, unnecessary surgery and its potential complications may be avoided.

A feasible CT feature to differentiate focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether the relative computed tomography (CT) value (rCT) of adjacent pancreatic parenchyma can distinguish focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (fAIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

A total of 13 patients with fAIP and 20 patients with PDAC were included in this study. The rCT was calculated as the ratio of the CT value of adjacent pancreatic parenchyma to that of muscle. The diagnostic performance of rCT for discriminating fAIP from PDAC was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Both fAIP and PDAC presented hyper-fibrosis histologically and delayed enhancement on CT examination. Moreover, the pancreatic parenchyma of fAIP presented serious inflammation. The mean rCT of the parenchyma was significantly lower in fAIP than in PDAC in all phases. The best diagnostic performance of the rCT value was found in the pancreatic phase, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.912, while the areas under the ROC curve of the portal and delayed phases were 0.812 and 0.754, respectively. The optimal cut-off value for distinguishing fAIP from PDAC was 1.62 in the pancreatic phase.

CONCLUSIONS

The rCT of the pancreatic parenchyma during the pancreatic phase may be a feasible CT feature for differentiating fAIP from PDAC.

Differentiating focal autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI with special emphasis on the arterial phase

OBJECTIVES

To compare focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) using contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI), and to assess diagnostic performance of the lesion contrast at arterial phase (AP) (Contrast_AP) for differentiating between the two diseases.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with focal-type AIP and 72 patients with PDA were included. All included patients underwent CE-MRI with triple phases. The signal intensity (SI) of the mass and normal pancreas was measured at each phase, and the lesion contrast (SI_pancreas/SI_mass) was compared between AIP and PDA groups. The sensitivity and specificity of Contrast_AP using an optimal cutoff point were compared with those of key imaging features specific to AIP and PDA.

RESULTS

The lesion contrast differed significantly between AIP and PDA groups at all phases of CE-MRI; the maximum difference was observed at AP. For AIP, the sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (87.5%) of Contrast_AP (cutoff ≤ 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 38.9-88.9%; specificity, 48.6-95.8%), except for the halo sign. For PDA, the sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (94.4%) of Contrast_AP (cutoff > 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 40.3-68.1%; specificity, 72.2-94.4%), except for the discrete mass.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of the lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at AP, was helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA. The diagnostic performance of Contrast_AP was mostly comparable or higher than those of the key imaging features.

KEY POINTS

• Diagnosis of focal-type AIP vs. PDA using imaging techniques is extremely challenging. • Lesion contrast in the arterial-phase MRI differs significantly between focal-type AIP and PDA. • Quantitative analysis of lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at the arterial phase, is helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA.

Pancreas Ductal Adenocarcinoma and its Mimics: Review of Cross-sectional Imaging Findings for Differential Diagnosis

Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common pancreatic neoplasm. A variety of pancreatic lesions mimic pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), such as high-grade neuroendocrine tumors, small solid pseudopapillary tumors, metastases, focal autoimmune pancreatitis, and groove pancreatitis. These occasionally look similar in images, but they have differential diagnosis points. Familiarity with the imaging features of PDAC and its mimics is paramount for correct diagnosis and management of patients. In this essay, we describe imaging findings of PDAC and its mimics for differential diagnosis.

Subspecialized radiology review at multidisciplinary pancreas conference: impact on patient management

PURPOSE

At our tertiary medical center, multidisciplinary subspecialists meet twice a week during a CME-accredited conference to discuss oncologic and non-oncologic patients with pancreatic diseases at which time a subspecialized abdominal staff radiologist reinterprets the patient's relevant imaging studies. This study assesses the changes in patient management due to imaging reinterpretation during multidisciplinary pancreas conference (MPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, imaging studies of all patients discussed at MPC between July 1 and December 31, 2015 were assessed for technical adequacy, and original reports analyzed for congruency with reinterpretation. Management measures included change in diagnosis, clinical stage, treatment, or workup. Additional data were obtained on referring services affected and their resultant change in practice. Changes in surgical resectability, surgical approach, or delayed operative dates were noted for surgeons. Changes in chemotherapeutic or radiation oncology regimens as well as decisions for additional imaging, laboratory workup, or histologic evaluation were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were included (54.4% males, 45.6% females, mean age 63.71 years). Relevant imaging consisted of 142 abdominal CT scans, 112 abdominal MRI scans, 1 abdominal ultrasound, and 1 nuclear medicine octreotide study of which 69.4% were performed in-house. Image quality was deemed appropriate in 95.2%. Cases presented included solid pancreatic malignancies (n = 140; 55.6%), cystic pancreatic lesions (n = 41; 16.3%), acute and chronic inflammatory conditions (n = 52; 20.6%), and miscellaneous entities (n = 10; 4.0%); 9 (3.6%) cases were normal. Image reinterpretation was congruent with original reports in 56.7%, with minor, moderate, and major discrepancies occurring in 9.5, 26.2%, and 7.5% of cases, respectively. Incongruent reinterpretation was predominantly due to perceptional errors (false-negative reports due to missed findings) and interpretative errors (false-positive results due to over-reporting or misclassification of diagnoses). Services most commonly affected included surgical oncology, radiology, and gastroenterology at 16.7%, 13.1%, and 12.7% of cases, respectively. Management changes included a change in diagnosis in 8.7%, change in clinical stage in 8.7%, change in treatment in 17.9%, and further workup needed in 19.0% of patients, respectively. No change in management occurred in the remaining 61.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Subspecialized abdominal radiologist reinterpretation in the context of more comprehensive patient information heavily impacts the multidisciplinary management of patients with pancreatic disorders. Further efforts are needed to solidify the abdominal radiologist's role in the multidisciplinary clinical setting.

Multiple solid pancreatic lesions: Prevalence and features of non-malignancies on dynamic enhanced CT

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of multiple solid pancreatic lesions on dynamic enhanced CT performed for suspected pancreatic diseases, and to identify CT features of non-malignancies.

METHODS

We investigated 8096 consecutive patients who underwent dynamic enhanced CT pancreas protocol at a tertiary center over 40 months. The final clinical /pathological diagnosis served as reference standard. The diagnostic accuracy of dynamic enhanced CT for non-malignancies was calculated. A univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify features that predict non-malignancies.

RESULTS

Multiple solid pancreatic lesions were identified in 121 patients. The prevalence of non-malignancies was 19.8% (24/121). The most common non-malignancy was autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 21; 17.4%). Common lesions with malignant potential included neuroendocrine neoplasia (n = 62; 51.2%), ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 15; 12.4%), metastasis (n = 9; 7.4%), and lymphoma (n = 7; 5.8%). Dynamic enhanced CT had a sensitivity of 79.2% and a specificity of 92.8% for diagnosing non-malignancies. Elevated serum IgG4 level (p < 0.001), hypo-enhancement in arterial phase (p = 0.001), hyper-enhancement in equilibrium phase (p = 0.009) and location in both proximal and distal pancreas (p = 0.036) were predictors of non-malignancies, whereas pancreatic duct morphology and vascular invasion status were not.

CONCLUSION

Multiple solid pancreatic lesions were rare, with a wide spectrum. Dynamic enhanced CT provides clues for identifying non-malignancies.

Abdominal manifestations of IgG4-related disease: a pictorial review

In the last decade, autoimmune pancreatitis has become recognised as part of a wider spectrum of IgG4-related disease, typically associated with elevated serum IgG4 levels and demonstrating a response to corticosteroid therapy. Radiologically, there is imaging overlap with other benign and neoplastic conditions. This pictorial review discusses the intra-abdominal manifestations of this disease on cross-sectional imaging before and after steroid treatment and the main radiological features which help to distinguish it from other key differentials.

TEACHING POINTS

• Autoimmune pancreatitis is part of a spectrum of IgG4-related disease. • Diagnosis is based on raised serum IgG4, clinical, radiological and histopathological findings. • Cross-sectional imaging can demonstrate the typical findings of abdominal IgG4-related disease. • Cross-sectional imaging can be used to monitor response to corticosteroid treatment.

Localized autoimmune pancreatitis mimicking pancreatic cancer: Case report and literature review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AP) is a rare autoimmune pancreatic manifestation of systemic immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related sclerosing disease. Distinguishing between AP and pancreatic cancer is crucial because the clinical courses, treatments, and prognoses of these two disease entities are quite different. We herein report a case involving a 52-year-old man with subacute epigastralgia who visited our hospital for evaluation of a suspicious pancreatic mass found during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed an enlarged lesion in the pancreatic head with encasement of hepatic vessels. The lesion also exhibited increased ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation on positron emission tomography/CT imaging, which was highly suggestive of pancreatic cancer. After open biopsy, morphologic examination showed an inflammatory infiltrate in the pancreas, which was compatible with chronic sclerotic pancreatitis. Further laboratory tests revealed an elevated serum IgG4 level, and the diagnosis of sclerotic pancreatitis was then confirmed. After corticosteroid treatment, the pancreatic lesion showed shrinkage on follow-up CT, and the serum IgG4 titer decreased to the normal range. This case suggests that clinicians should be familiar with the clinical presentations and diagnostic criteria of AP versus pancreatic cancer. An awareness of the differences between these diseases may avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgical intervention.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Imaging features

Background and Objectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remains a difficult disease to diagnose before treatment, particularly if presenting as a focal mass lesion. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study is to analyze imaging features of histologically confirmed AIP to determine the additional diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS), and elastography to B-mode features.

Patients and Methods

We report on a retrospective data collection of 60 histologically confirmed cases of AIP in comparison to 16 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC). All CE (-E) US examinations were assessed by two independent readers in consensus. The role of CEUS and CE-EUS for pancreatic evaluation was defined according to the 2011 European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guidelines.

Results

After injection of ultrasound (US) contrast agents, most AIP lesions displayed focal or diffuse isoenhancement (86.6%) in the arterial phase, while most of the PDAC lesions (93.7%) were hypoenhancing (P < 0.01). During the late phase, most AIP lesions were hyper-(65%) or iso-enhancing (35%), while most PDAC lesions were hypoenhancing (93.7%). CE-EUS was performed in a subset of ten patients and showed hyperenhancement in all AIP cases. Most focal AIP lesions (n = 27, 79.4%) were stiffer than the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma.

Conclusions

In this study, percutaneous and endoscopic contrast enhanced harmonic US techniques consistently revealed diffuse and focal types of AIP to have features consistent with vascularized lesions. Differentiation from the typically hypovascularized pancreatic adenocarcinoma was possible with CE (-E) US evaluation.

Multifocal Mass Lesions in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

A 59-year-old male patient with jaundice was referred to our hospital because of mass lesions in the pancreatic head and tail. An immunological examination revealed an elevated serum IgG4 level. Computed tomography showed two clear boundary mass lesions in the pancreatic head and tail. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the mass lesions exhibited low intensity on T1-weighted images and iso-intensity on T2-weighted images. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed an obstruction of the main pancreatic duct in the pancreatic head and tail. The possibility of malignant tumors could not be ruled out; therefore, we performed total pancreatectomy. A histopathological examination of the nodular lesions revealed severe lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and inflammatory change around the pancreatic ducts. Immunohistochemistry revealed diffuse infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells in the nodules. According to these pathological findings, we diagnosed the patient with IgG4-related multifocal mass lesions of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). It is difficult to distinguish between focal type AIP and pancreatic cancer. We herein report a rare case of multifocal mass lesions in AIP and include bibliographical comments.

Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Can Be Used to Rule Out Malignancy in Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review the suitability of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for ruling out malignancy in autoimmune pancreatitis patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 40 autoimmune pancreatitis patients (type 1:37 patients; type 2: two patients; possible autoimmune pancreatitis: one patient) who received EUS-FNA. Among the 40 autoimmune pancreatitis patients, 34 were not histopathologically diagnosed with autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA, and they were followed up for more than 6 months in our hospital. Moreover, 14 pancreatic cancer patients who were not diagnosed by EUS-FNA were selected as a control group. These 14 patients constituted 3.9% of the 360 pancreatic cancer patients who received EUS-FNA. We evaluated the prognoses of the 34 autoimmune pancreatitis patients and the clinical differences between these 34 autoimmune pancreatitis patients and the 14 pancreatic cancer patients.

RESULTS

All 34 autoimmune pancreatitis patients showed reduced pancreatic swelling. The main pancreatic duct dilation ( > 3 mm), the diameter of the main pancreatic duct, the capsule-like rim sign, and serum CA19-9 levels were significantly different between the autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer patients (2.9% versus 69.2%, P < .01; 1.7 ± 1.6 mm versus 6.8 ± 5.0 mm, P < .01; 79.4% versus 0%, P < .01; 41.4 ± 79.0 U/mL versus 2079.1 ± 275.3 U/mL, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all pancreatic cancers can be diagnosed by EUS-FNA. Furthermore, other clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer undiagnosed by EUS-FNA were different from autoimmune pancreatitis undiagnosed by EUS-FNA. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA can be used to rule out malignancy in autoimmune pancreatitis patients.

Solitary Pancreatic Metastasis From Breast Matrix-Producing Carcinoma: A First Case Report

Introduction:

Breast matrix-producing carcinoma (MPC) is a rare histologic type. Pancreatic metastases from breast cancers are also rare. We report the first case of solitary pancreatic metastasis from breast MPC, treated with distal pancreatectomy.

Case presentation:

A 56-year-old woman presented with a 56-mm mass in her right breast and a swollen right axillary lymph node. Both lesions had characteristic early ring enhancement on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Tumor biopsy revealed MPC. She underwent total mastectomy and axillary clearance. On histopathologic examination, the tumor was composed of extracellular matrix with areas of osseous and chondroid differentiation without spindle cells or osteoclasts, surrounded by a dense population of glandular epithelial tumor cells. On immunohistochemical analysis, the tumor cells were positive for AE1/AE3 and cytokeratin 5/6. The final diagnosis was breast MPC with axillary metastasis. Two years later, dynamic MRI displayed a mass in the pancreatic body with early ring enhancement, suspicious for solitary breast MPC metastasis. Distal pancreatectomy was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed bone and cartilaginous matrix with necrosis, surrounded by pleomorphic sarcomatous tumor cells. Tumor cells showed less cytokeratin positivity than the primary breast lesion. These findings were compatible with breast MPC metastasis.

Conclusion:

Solitary pancreatic metastasis from breast MPC has not yet been reported. Surgical resection of malignant pancreatic metastases is controversial; however, considering that breast MPC has limited responsiveness to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, curative resection would be important in this case. The histopathologic features of MPC may reflect enhancement and calcification on radiologic studies.

From Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestation, and Diagnosis to Treatment: An Overview on Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis which is autoimmune mediated. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) 2011 proposed two types of AIP: type I is associated with histological pattern of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), characterized by serum IgG4 elevation, whereas type 2 is named idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP), with granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) negative. The pathogenic mechanism is unclear now; based on genetic factors, disease specific or related antigens, innate and adaptive immunity may be involved. The most common clinical manifestations of AIP are obstructive jaundice and upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis can be made by a combination of parenchymal and ductal imaging, serum IgG4 concentrations, pancreatic histology, extrapancreatic disease, and glucocorticoid responsiveness according to ICDC 2011. Because of the clinical and imaging similarities with pancreatic cancer, general work-up should be done carefully to exclude pancreatic malignant tumor before empirical trial of glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoid is the most common drug for AIP to induce remission, while there still exists controversy on steroid maintenance and treatment for relapse. Further studies should be done to identify more specific serum biomarkers for AIP, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the treatment for relapse.

Secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of findings in pancreatic diseases

Abstract

MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an imaging technique that has evolved over the past 2 decades and that continues to have a fundamental role in the non-invasive detection of morphologic features of the pancreatic ducts. In several studies, MRCP has shown a good correlation with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of diseases and anatomic variants of the pancreatic ductal system. However, in physiologic conditions the pancreatic ducts are not always easily recognisable. More recently, secretin-enhanced MRCP protocols have been developed for a more complete assessment of pancreatic ducts and glandular function, including monitoring of pancreatic flow dynamics and duodenal filling after pancreatic hormonal stimulation with secretin. The injection of this hormone causes temporary dilation of the pancreatic ducts, principally by increasing pancreatic exocrine secretions, and thus improving MRCP detection of the ducts and characterisation of pancreatic disorders and allowing the assessment of the exocrine pancreatic reserve. The purpose of this pictorial review is to summarise the technical aspects of secretin-stimulated MRCP, to report the secretin-stimulated MRCP findings of pancreatic duct abnormalities and to review the diagnostic capabilities of secretin-stimulated MRCP in various pancreatic ductal system conditions.

Main Messages

• MRCP has a fundamental role in the non-invasive detection of pancreatic ducts.

• In physiologic conditions pancreatic ducts are not always well detected on MRCP.

• Secretin injection causes temporary dilation of pancreatic ducts and thus improves MRCP detection.

• Secretin-stimulated MRCP may allow the assessment of the exocrine pancreatic reserve.

• Secretin increases the diagnostic capabilities of MRCP for evaluating pancreatic disorders.

Imaging features of immunoglobulin G4-related disease

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a fibroinflammatory condition that was first recognised as a systemic disease in 2003, when patients with autoimmune pancreatitis were found to have extrapancreatic manifestations. Since 2003, IgG4-RD has been described in a diverse range of other organs including the biliary tree, orbits, lacrimal glands, salivary glands, lungs, kidneys, aorta, retroperitoneum, lymph nodes, pachymeninges, prostate and pituitary gland. The disease frequently occurs in the absence of pancreatic involvement. The imaging manifestations of IgG4-RD are broad and variable depending on the organ involved. The majority of individual organ appearances are non-specific and differentiation between IgG4-RD and potentially more serious conditions is not usually possible based on radiological findings in one organ alone. However, if there are simultaneous findings typical of IgG4-RD in multiple organs then this is a key diagnostic clue and IgG4-RD should be considered as one of the main differentials. This review article examines the spectrum of imaging appearances of IgG4-RD. Increased awareness of the spectrum of radiological appearances of IgG4-RD throughout the body and subsequent consideration of the condition may potentially avoid invasive treatment and lead to more prompt corticosteroid therapy.

Differentiation of mass-forming focal pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: value of characterizing dynamic enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced MR images by adding signal intensity color mapping

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of dynamic enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced MR images by adding signal intensity colour mapping (SICM) to differentiate mass-forming focal pancreatitis (MFFP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Forty-one clinicopathologically proven MFFPs and 144 surgically confirmed PDACs were enrolled. Laboratory and MR imaging parameters were used to differentiate MFFP from PDAC. In particular, enhancement patterns on MR images adding SICM were evaluated. By using classification tree analysis (CTA), we determined the predictors for the differentiation of MFFP from PDAC.

RESULTS

In the CTA, with all parameters except enhancement pattern on SICM images, ductal obstruction grade and T1 hypointensity grade of the pancreatic lesion were the first and second splitting predictor for differentiation of MFFP from PDAC, in order. By adding an enhancement pattern on the SICM images to CTA, the enhancement pattern was the only splitting predictor to differentiate MFFP from PDAC. The CTA model including enhancement pattern on SICM images has sensitivity of 78.0 %, specificity of 99.3 %, and accuracy of 94.6 % for differentiating MFFP from PDAC.

CONCLUSION

The characterization of enhancement pattern for pancreatic lesions on contrast-enhanced MR images adding SICM would be helpful to differentiate MFFP from PDAC.

KEY POINTS

• SICM was useful to characterize enhancement pattern. • Enhancement pattern on SICM was the only splitting predictor on CTA. • This model may be useful for differentiating MFFP from PDAC.

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease: autoimmune pancreatitis and extrapancreatic manifestations

We present a case of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease with pancreatic and extrapancreatic involvement, including the biliary and renal systems. Given the importance of imaging methods for the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease and its differentiation from pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we emphasize important abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings related to this recently recognized systemic autoimmune disease.

Mass-forming type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis mimicking pancreatic cancer

We reported three cases of mass-forming type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) that were preoperatively suspected to be pancreatic cancer, and reviewed their clinicopathological features. Radiological findings in the patients revealed hypoattenuating masses in the early phase or a stricture of the main pancreatic duct with upstream dilatation, which was consistent with the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Histopathologically, the lesions were well demarcated and met all diagnostic criteria for immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related AIP, including the presence of periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, obliterative phlebitis, storiform fibrosis and abundant IgG4-positive plasma cells. However, the adjacent uninvolved pancreatic duct and lobular structures were well preserved. And in all patients, none or some of the aforementioned characteristics were observed. We suggest that some cases of focal AIP may progress to more severe grades and exhibit mass formation, although remaining localized. These focal cases of AIP are difficult to distinguish from pancreatic cancer. To our knowledge, this report is the first to present a histopathological comparison of mass-forming AIP with the adjacent uninvolved pancreatic tissues.

Localized Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Report of a Case Clinically Mimicking Pancreatic Cancer and a Literature Review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease with clinical presentations that greatly mimic pancreatic cancer (PC). It is critical for clinicians to distinguish AIP from PC because their treatments and prognoses are entirely different. Typical images show characteristic features such as diffuse pancreatic swelling and strictures of the main pancreatic duct (MPD). However, AIP may present as a localized pancreatic mass, in which case it is very difficult to differentiate from PC. Here, we report a case of a 40-year-old man with computed tomography (CT) imaging studies confirming an area of low-density neoplasm in the uncinate process of the pancreas with dilation in the common biliary duct (CBD) and MPD. Increased uptake in the uncinate mass was observed by positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan, which strongly suggested PC. Further laboratory analyses showed a marked elevation of serum IgG4. Because there was not enough evidence to rule out a diagnosis of malignancy, a histopathological biopsy became the criterion standard. An endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided needle biopsy failed. As an alternative, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was conducted for the biopsy, and pathological analysis confirmed IgG4-related sclerotic chronic pancreatitis with moderate lymphoplasmacellular infiltration.We suggest that an accurate preoperative diagnosis for localized AIP with MPD and CBD obstructions mimicking PC is of great importance. Radiological imaging findings, particularly observations of diffused enlargement of the pancreas and delayed enhancement during the venous and portal phases, are essential for diagnosing AIP. Careful consideration should be given if serum IgG4 was taken as a special indicator for a differential diagnosis between AIP and PC. A history of IgG4-related diseases involving the biliary, lacrimal, salivary, retroperitoneal, renal, or pulmonary systems should also be highlighted. Thus, the pathology of extrapancreatic organs can be utilized as diagnostic evidence when the pathology for a pancreatic mass is not available, as in the case presented here. Furthermore, cautious use of hormone therapy is indicated for patients who cannot be ruled out as having PC. The results of future studies on localized AIP are eagerly awaited.

Differentiation of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma: assessment by multiphase contrast-enhanced CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) findings alone and in combination for differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (f-AIP) from pancreatic carcinoma (PC).

METHODS

The study group comprised 22 f-AIP lesions and 61 PC lesions. Two radiologists independently evaluated CT findings. Frequencies of findings were compared between f-AIP and PC. Statistical, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Homogeneous enhancement during the portal phase (AIP, 59 % vs. PC, 3 %; P < 0.001), dotted enhancement during the pancreatic phase (50 % vs. 7 %; P < 0.001), duct-penetrating sign (46 % vs. 2 %; P < 0.001), enhanced duct sign (36 % vs. 2 %; P < 0.001) and capsule-like rim (46 % vs. 3 %; P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in AIP. Ring-like enhancement during the delayed phase (5 % vs. 46 %; P < 0.001) and peripancreatic strands with a length of at least 10 mm (5 % vs. 39 %; P = 0.001) were more frequently observed in PC. AIP was identified with 82 % sensitivity and 98 % specificity using four of these seven findings. Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in dotted enhancement (P = 0.004), duct-penetrating sign (P < 0.001) and capsule-like rim (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CT findings may allow improvements in differentiating f-AIP from PC.

KEY POINTS

• f-AIP can mimic PC on imaging findings. • The differentiation of f-AIP from PC is important in patient management. • Some CT findings can be used to identify AIP. • The combination of CT findings will improve differentiation from PC.

Pancreatic duct abnormalities in focal autoimmune pancreatitis: MR/MRCP imaging findings

AIM

To evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-MR cholangiopancreatographic (MRCP) findings of focal forms of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) to describe ductal involvement at diagnosis.

METHODS

MR examinations of 123 patients affected by AIP were analysed. We included 26 patients who satisfied International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria and were suffering from focal AIP. Image analysis included: site of parenchymal enlargement, main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter, MPD stenosis, stricture length, presence of upstream dilation within the stricture, signal intensity, and pancreatic enhancement.

RESULTS

Signal intensity abnormalities were localized in the head in 10/26 (38.5%) and in the body-tail in 16/26 (61.5%) patients. MRCP showed a single MPD stenosis in 12/26 (46.1%) and multiple MPD stenosis in 14/26 (53.8%) patients, without a dilation of the upstream MPD (mean: 3.83 mm). Lesions showed hypointensity on T1-weighted images in all patients, and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images in 22/26 (84.6%) patients. The affected parenchyma was hypovascular during the arterial phase in 25/26 (96.2%) patients with contrast retention.

CONCLUSIONS

MR-MRCP are effective techniques for the diagnosis of AIP showing the loss of the physiological lobulation and the typical contrastographic appearance. The presence of multiple, long stenoses without an upstream MPD dilation at MRCP suggests the diagnosis of AIP, and can be useful in differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

KEY POINTS

• MRI represents the gold standard in the diagnosis of AIP. • MRCP is an increasingly useful technique in the diagnosis of focal AIP. • MRCP could be a problem-solving tool in the differential diagnosis of AIP.

Pancreatic duct "Icicle sign" on MRI for distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the proximal pancreas

OBJECTIVE

To determine reliable MRI features of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in the proximal pancreas that could allow its differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with AIP and 61 patients with PDAC in the proximal pancreas underwent MRI. Two observers analyzed MRI for lesion morphology, hypointensity degree on T1-weighted images, enhancement pattern during dynamic phases, capsule-like rim, presence of cysts and duct penetrating sign, morphology of bile duct, and icicle appearance and tortuosity of the upstream pancreatic duct. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of AIP were calculated for each category or combined.

RESULTS

When isointensity on the portal and late phase of MRI and/or the icicle sign of pancreatic duct are applied, 100 % sensitivity for the diagnosis of AIP in the proximal pancreas was achieved. Applying both mild T1 hypointensity similar to the spleen and the icicle sign enabled 100 % specificity for the diagnosis of AIP by differentiating it from PDAC.

CONCLUSION

The combination of the icicle sign in the upstream pancreatic duct and mild T1 hypointensity or isointensity on portal and late phase of dynamic MRI could be reliable MR features for the diagnosis of AIP in the proximal pancreas by allowing its differentiation from PDAC.

KEY POINTS

• The icicle sign of the pancreatic duct is useful for diagnosing AIP. • Mild T1 hypointensity similar to the spleen is useful for diagnosing AIP. • Isointensity on portal and late phases MRI is useful for diagnosing AIP.