Proton pump inhibitors therapy vs H2 receptor antagonists therapy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopy: A meta-analysis

Similar Effect of Vonoprazan and Oral Proton Pump Inhibitors for Preventing Rebleeding in Cases of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Objective The use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reduces rebleeding and mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Vonoprazan is a novel oral agent with strong and sustained acid-inhibitory activity. We clarified the effect of vonoprazan compared with oral PPIs in such patients. Methods We analyzed the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was rebleeding, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and in-hospital mortality after rebleeding. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the comparison groups, and logistic regression analyses were used to compare the outcomes between vonoprazan and oral PPIs. Patients Patients on vonoprazan or oral PPIs who underwent endoscopic hemostasis for UGIB between 2014 and 2019 were included. Results We enrolled 78,964 patients, of whom 27,101 and 51,863 were prescribed vonoprazan and a PPI, respectively. After propensity score matching, the rebleeding rate of vonoprazan did not significantly differ from that of oral PPIs [6.4% vs. 6.1%; odds ratio (OR), 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-1.13]; similarly, the in-hospital mortality rate (1.4% vs. 1.5%; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05) and in-hospital mortality after rebleeding (0.3% vs. 0.2%; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.78-1.54) also did not significantly differ between the groups. The acquired findings were robust across dose-restricted analyses and several sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Rebleeding and in-hospital mortality risks in patients on vonoprazan were similar to those in patients on oral PPIs. Considering the higher cost of vonoprazan, oral PPIs might be an optimal oral agent as an acid-suppressive therapy in such patients.

Antacid Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure: Proton Pump Inhibitors vs. H2 Receptor Blockers

PURPOSE

Acid suppressive therapy using histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can be utilized for the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among patients with cardiovascular disease receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, emerging data suggests underlying associations between PPI or H2RA use and cardiovascular disease incidence, progression, and mortality. This review explores the history of acid suppressive therapies and their use in cardiovascular disease patients and the growing evidence in support of H2RA use.

RECENT FINDINGS

PPIs were originally championed as better than H2RAs for preventing GIB events in cardiovascular disease patients on DAPT therapy, but there is evidence to suggest that drug-drug interactions between clopidogrel and PPIs may translate to worse cardiovascular outcomes. Studies demonstrating PPI superiority in the setting of DAPT were also limited due to small sample sizes and high levels of bias. Consequently, there is renewed interest in H2RAs for patients on DAPT with some data demonstrating similar or improved clinical outcomes over PPI therapy. Additionally, studies have discovered a possible role for H2RAs in the management of heart failure (HF) incidence, symptoms, and mortality. Studies comparing H2RAs and PPIs in patients on DAPT have demonstrated mixed results for cardiovascular and GIB outcomes, with several studies being underpowered and limited by biases. Recent clinical and pre-clinical studies now support the noninferiority of H2RAs for major outcomes and even utility in HF. These findings suggest that H2RAs may warrant reconsideration as an acid suppressive therapy over PPIs for patients on DAPT or with HF.

Assessment of adherence to the national stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: A cross-sectional analysis

Background

Clinical guidelines support the use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in patients at risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding such as those with coagulopathy, renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. Despite the observed benefits of SUP, its overuse has been highly associated with serious adverse effects.

Objective

To assess the adherence to the national SUP guidelines in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic health records at King Fahad Specialist Hospital (KFSH), Buraydah, Saudi Arabia. We collected the data from January 1st to December 31st, 2020. Adult patients aged 18 and older who received SUP prescriptions were included. Descriptive analysis was performed to assess the adherence to the guidelines and to explore the factors associated with SUP use in a hospital-based setting.

Results

A total of 424 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age of patients was 55.2 years old. Only 54% of patients were candidates for SUP. Internal medicine and surgery wards ranked the highest in prescribing SUP at 34.2% and 30.4%, respectively. The most common major criterion to start SUP was the concomitant use of two or more of these medications (anticoagulants, aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and antidepressants) followed by using NSAIDs or corticosteroids by older adult patients aged (≥65 years) or have GI bleeding history at 43.2% and 21.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

The observed overuse of anti-ulcer drugs (AUD) indicates a need for greater adherence to SUP guidelines. Areas of improvement can be implemented to ensure appropriate adherence to SUP guidelines to control the costs and avoid unnecessary anti-ulcer-related adverse effects.

Effects of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib is an irreversible, mutant-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Co-administration of TKIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) can lead to potential drug-drug interactions, which decreases solubility and absorption of TKIs and is ultimately associated with reduced efficacy of TKIs. This retrospective analysis evaluated the effect of ARAs on the pharmacokinetics of lazertinib using data obtained from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In a total of 234 patients with lazertinib pharmacokinetics observed at steady state, dose-normalized (DN) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_ss), maximum concentration (C_max,ss), and/or trough concentration on day 15 (C_D15) were compared between a group receiving ARA concomitantly for at least 4 days (ARA group) and another group not receiving ARA (non-ARA group) in a dose-proportional range. Additionally, a comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters at a therapeutic dose of 240 mg once daily was evaluated.

RESULTS

Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of ARA group to non-ARA group for DNAUC_ss, DNC_max,ss, and DNC_D15 at 40 mg to 320 mg once daily showing the dose proportionality were 0.8743 (0.7285-1.0493), 0.9035 (0.7482-1.0910), and 0.9126 (0.7364-1.1311), respectively. GMRs with 90% CIs for AUC_ss, C_max,ss, and C_D15 at 240 mg were 0.9136 (0.6637-1.2576), 0.9012 (0.6703-1.2116), and 0.8850 (0.6463-1.2118), respectively.

CONCLUSION

All pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (p values > 0.05), indicating that co-administered ARAs did not significantly affect the steady state pharmacokinetics of lazertinib. Therefore, no dose adjustment of lazertinib is required in patients receiving concomitant ARAs.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT03046992, NCT04075396.

Influence of Hospital Formularies on Outpatient Prescribing Practices: Analysis of the Introduction of a Local Formulary: A Single-Center, 2-Year Follow-Up, Retrospective Cohort Study of a Local Formulary in Japan

Purpose

The impact of a hospital formulary was evaluated to provide a guide for the establishment of local formularies to optimize patient care and healthcare costs.

Methods

A formulary was introduced by formulary pharmacists of the Toda Medical Group for suggesting recommended medicines to physicians based on the medication history. Patients who were hospitalized in the rehabilitation ward of the Niiza Hospital and prescribed medicines according to the formulary introduced between April 2017 and March 2018 were included and followed-up for six months.

Results

Of the 183 patients screened, 154 patients were enrolled as the formulary’s introduction patients (76 males/78 females, median age 78 years); 92% of these patients received formulary-proposed prescriptions at the specified timepoints; and 19 patients re-consulted at the Niiza Hospital after discharge and continued the same formulary medicines. The proposed acceptance rate by physicians was 100%. Most changes suggested introduced generic formulations. The doses were equivalent for all pharmacological classes with the exception of medicines that interfere with the renin–angiotensin system, which fell from 10.7 to 7.2 mg (P< .0001). Overall daily medication costs fell at discharge compared to admission (38.5 vs. 94.6 yen per patient, respectively, P< .0001). This was valid for all pharmacological classes except for calcium channel blockers.

Conclusion

Hospital formulary-prescribed medications continued after discharge and promoted significant decreases in costs associated with outpatient prescriptions. Introducing a hospital formulary provides a basis for the introduction of local formularies and contributes to the reduction of local healthcare costs.

Effect of frequently prescribed drugs on gastric cancer risk

Gastric cancer is the fifth leading cancer worldwide. Infection with Helicobacter pylori represents the major risk factor, but only a small fraction of infected individuals will develop neoplasia. The progression of advanced gastric lesions to cancer is influenced by characteristics of the bacterial strain, host genetic and environmental factors. Recently, the effect of medications on gastric cancer risk has gained interest, because many commonly prescribed drugs affect gastric homeostasis. While non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a frequent cause of gastric ulcer disease, low-dose aspirin has been propagated for chemoprevention of various tumour entities. Beneficial effects of cyclooxygenase-inhibition for gastric cancer prevention is plausible, but its clinical relevance remains unclear. Furthermore, anti-tumorous effects have been postulated for statins and metformin. On the contrary, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are commonly used for prevention of gastric ulcers and bleeding, have been associated with an increased gastric cancer risk in large observational studies. Most of these observations still require confirmation in prospective controlled trials. NSAIDs, statins and metformin have also been investigated as concomitant cancer treatment, but studies did not show convincing results to date. Here, we review the available evidence and possible mechanisms for the role of PPIs, NSAIDs, statins and metformin in gastric carcinogenesis, and discuss possible implications for clinical practice.

Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in an Academic, Primary Care Clinic: Quality Improvement Project

GOAL

The goal of this study was to reduce the percentage of inappropriately prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients aged 50 and older from 80% (baseline) to 60% within 12 months in an academic, internal medicine clinic.

BACKGROUND

The use of PPIs has increased drastically worldwide. Internal medicine clinic patients had inappropriate use of PPIs for an average of 4 to 5 years.

STUDY

A multidisciplinary quality improvement team used the Plan-Do-Study-Act Model of health care improvement and performed a root cause analysis to identify barriers to inappropriate use of PPIs. The outcome measure was the percentage of patients inappropriately prescribed PPI. Process measures were completion rates of PPI risk assessment and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Interventions included the creation of customized electronic health record templates and education to providers and patients. Analysis was performed using monthly statistical process control charts.

RESULTS

The average rate of PPI discontinuation was 51.1% (n=92/180), which corresponds to 30.0% inappropriate PPI usage within 12 months. The mean PPI discontinuation rate in the 1-year prestudy, study and 6 months poststudy period was 2.0%, 32.0%, and 49.7%, respectively. The mean esophagogastroduodenoscopy completion rate was 49.8% from the baseline of <30%.

CONCLUSIONS

We achieved a statistically significant and sustainable reduction of inappropriate PPI use to 30% from the baseline rates of 80% and surpassed our goal within 12 months. This quality improvement was unique as no pharmacy personnel was utilized in this process. The multifaceted strategies in a safety-net internal medicine clinic resulted in successful deprescribing of PPI and can be replicated in other setting.

Does Weekend Hospital Admission Affect Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes?: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Compared with weekday admissions, weekend admissions are consistently associated with worse patient outcomes, known as the "weekend effect." The weekend effect may have adverse health consequences, including death. To determine the potential impact of the weekend effect on primary (ie, mortality) and secondary outcomes of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a network meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Databases were searched for studies published up to April 2018. The predefined primary outcome was mortality (30-d mortality and in-hospital mortality). The secondary efficacy outcomes were rebleeding rates, use of endoscopic therapy, need for surgery or angiography, mean length of hospital stay, and time to endoscopy. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42018094660).

RESULTS

In total, 25 studies, including 28 analyses (N=1,203,202 patients), were eligible. The results revealed a tendency toward increased 30-day mortality and increased in-hospital mortality among weekend admissions. In a subgroup analysis, there were significance differences in mortality according to the study location (ie, Europe) and UGIH type (ie, variceal UGIH), with these subgroups having elevated mortality rates. Moreover, weekday admissions were associated with a significant decrease in rebleeding rates. In the network meta-analysis, the study location (in Europe or Asia) and type of UGIH (ie, variceal UGIH) were associated with an increased likelihood of high in-hospital mortality among weekend admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence derived from this network meta-analysis supports the idea that weekend admissions are associated with an increased risk of death, especially among variceal UGIH patients in European hospitals.

Stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adult neurocritical care patients: a Chinese multicenter, retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

China has limited data on stress-related gastrointestinal ulcers in patients admitted for neurosurgical care. This study evaluated the incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in Chinese neurocritical care patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤10).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study was performed from January 2015 to July 2015. Medical records of 1468 patients hospitalized during 2014 were reviewed. An estimated UGIB incidence rate of 4.4% was considered for precision of 1.3% for estimation of UGIB. The primary endpoint was evaluation of overall incidence of any overt UGIB in ≤14 days after cerebral lesion. Secondary endpoints included incidence of UGIB with or and without clinically significant complications, time to UGIB, associated risk factors and SUP used.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1416 patients (mean age: 53.7 ± 14.00 years; males: 62.4%) with cerebral lesions. Overall incidence rate of UGIB ≤14 days was 12.9% (95% CI: 11.2%-14.7%), 0.76% with and 12.1% without significant clinical complications. Average time and duration of bleeding were 2.9 ± 3.37 days and 4.2 ± 8.4 days, respectively. The most significant risk factors for UGIB were mechanical ventilation for >48 hours (p < .0001), UGIB history (p = .0026) and use of anticoagulants (p < .0001). Acid-suppression drugs were administered for SUP in 79.0% of the patients, whereas 40.5% received hemostatic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of UGIB incidence was higher than the estimated rate in neurocritical care patients in China, suggesting the need for better management and treatment for stress-related mucosal disease in China. History of UGIB, mechanical ventilation and/or anticoagulants significantly affected UGIB. ClinicalTrials registry number: NCT02316990.

Proton pump inhibitors: use and misuse in the clinical setting

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice has greatly improved our therapeutic approach to acid-related diseases for their efficacy and safety. Areas Covered: The following evidence-based indications for PPI use are acknowledged by many scientific societies: treatment of the various forms and complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease, eradication of H. pylori infection in combination with two or more antibiotics, short- and long-term therapy of H. pylori-negative peptic ulcers, healing, and prevention of NSAID/COXIB-associated gastric ulcers, co-therapy with endoscopic procedures to control upper digestive bleeding and medical treatment of Zollinger Ellison syndrome. Expert Commentary: Despite the above well-defined indications, however, the use of PPIs continues to grow every year in both western and eastern countries and the endless expansion of the PPI market has created important problems for many regulatory authorities for two relevant features: the progressive increase of the costs of therapy and the greater potential harms for the patients. The major reasons for the misuse of PPIs are the prevention of gastro-duodenal ulcers in patients without risk factors and the stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-intensive care units, steroid therapy alone, anti-platelet or anti-coagulant treatment in patients without risk of gastric injury and the overtreatment of functional dyspepsia.

Appropriateness in prescribing PPIs: A position paper of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) - Study section "Digestive Diseases in Primary Care"

The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice about thirty years ago has greatly improved our therapeutic approach to acid-related diseases for their well-recognized efficacy and safety. Despite the well-defined indications, however, the use of PPIs continues to grow every year in both western and eastern countries and this phenomenon poses serious queries that include the onset of potential adverse effects and the increase in health care costs. The major reason explaining this worrying market expansion is the inappropriate use of PPIs. In order to re-establish a correct use of these effective drugs in daily clinical practice, the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), nominated a panel of experts who reviewed the available clinical literature and produced a series of updated position statements on the use of PPIs in clinical practice.

Effective and safe proton pump inhibitor therapy in acid-related diseases - A position paper addressing benefits and potential harms of acid suppression

BACKGROUND

The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice has revolutionized the management of acid-related diseases. Studies in primary care and emergency settings suggest that PPIs are frequently prescribed for inappropriate indications or for indications where their use offers little benefit. Inappropriate PPI use is a matter of great concern, especially in the elderly, who are often affected by multiple comorbidities and are taking multiple medications, and are thus at an increased risk of long-term PPI-related adverse outcomes as well as drug-to-drug interactions. Herein, we aim to review the current literature on PPI use and develop a position paper addressing the benefits and potential harms of acid suppression with the purpose of providing evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate use of these medications.

METHODS

The topics, identified by a Scientific Committee, were assigned to experts selected by three Italian Scientific Societies, who independently performed a systematic search of the relevant literature using Medline/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Search outputs were distilled, paying more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analyses (where available) representing the best evidence. The draft prepared on each topic was circulated amongst all the members of the Scientific Committee. Each expert then provided her/his input to the writing, suggesting changes and the inclusion of new material and/or additional relevant references. The global recommendations were then thoroughly discussed in a specific meeting, refined with regard to both content and wording, and approved to obtain a summary of current evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-five years after their introduction into clinical practice, PPIs remain the mainstay of the treatment of acid-related diseases, where their use in gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, Helicobacter pylori infection, peptic ulcer disease and bleeding as well as, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is appropriate. Prevention of gastroduodenal mucosal lesions (and symptoms) in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antiplatelet therapies and carrying gastrointestinal risk factors also represents an appropriate indication. On the contrary, steroid use does not need any gastroprotection, unless combined with NSAID therapy. In dyspeptic patients with persisting symptoms, despite successful H. pylori eradication, short-term PPI treatment could be attempted. Finally, addition of PPIs to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with refractory steatorrhea may be worthwhile.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, PPIs are irreplaceable drugs in the management of acid-related diseases. However, PPI treatment, as any kind of drug therapy, is not without risk of adverse effects. The overall benefits of therapy and improvement in quality of life significantly outweigh potential harms in most patients, but those without clear clinical indication are only exposed to the risks of PPI prescription. Adhering with evidence-based guidelines represents the only rational approach to effective and safe PPI therapy. Please see related Commentary: doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0724-1 .