Recent advances in prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

Advancements in the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence by nucleos(t)ide analogue monotherapies after liver transplantation

Previous studies have shown that the recurrence rate of HBV (hepatitis B virus) after liver transplantation (LT) can be as high as 80% without any preventive measures. Therefore, prevention of HBV recurrence after LT is always an essential part of clinical work worldwide. The NAs that have been approved for HBV treatment include lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir (ETV), and telbivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). They are often combined with HBIG to prevent HBV recurrence after LT clinically. However, NAs with a higher genetic barrier, such as ETV, TDF, and TAF, can improve liver function by strongly inhibiting HBV replication and reducing the risks of HBV resistance. Recently, some NAs with a higher genetic barrier, such as ETV, TDF, and TAF, have been adopted as monotherapy for preventing the recurrence of hepatitis B after LT in multiple organ transplant centres and have achieved effective outcomes. This article aims to review the advances for NAs monotherapy in prophylaxis for HBV recurrence after LT.

Baseline Quantitative Hepatitis B Core Antibody Titer Is a Predictor for Hepatitis B Virus Infection Recurrence After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Objective

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection is a serious complication that arise in patients who undergo hepatitis B virus related liver transplantation. We aimed to use biomarkers to evaluate the HBV reinfection in patients after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Methods

Seventy-nine patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2009 and 2015 were enrolled, and levels of biomarkers were analyzed at different time points. Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of different markers at baseline were used to analyze sustained hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the levels of the biomarkers.

Results

Among the 79 patients, 42 sustained HBsAg loss with a median time of 65.2 months (12.0-114.5, IQR 19.5) after liver transplantation and 37 patients exhibited HBsAg recurrence with a median time of 8.8 (0.47-59.53, IQR 19.47) months. In the ROC curve analysis, at baseline, 4.25 log₁₀ IU/mL qHBcAb and 2.82 log₁₀ IU/mL qHBsAg showed the maximum Youden’s index values with area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.685and 0.651, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method indicated that qHBsAg and quantitative antibody against hepatitis B core antigen (qHBcAb) levels in the two groups were significantly different (p = 0.031 and 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, the Cox regression model confirmed the predictive ability of qHBcAb at baseline (AUC = 0.685).

Conclusion

Lower pretransplantation qHBcAb is associated with HBV infection. The baseline concentration of qHBcAb is a promising predictor for the recurrence of HBV in patients undergoing liver transplantation and can be used to guide antiviral treatment for HBV infection.

Tenofovir in the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation, a single center large population study

AIM

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) compared with lamivudine (LAM) in the prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation (LT).

BACKGROUND

Although the recurrence of hepatitis B virus after liver transplantation (LT) is now very uncommon with both nucleoside and nucleotide analogs represented with lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, respectively, few studies have compared the two classes.

METHODS

A total of 302 HBV-related post-transplant patients who received liver transplants from deceased donors were enrolled in this retrospective study from 2011 to 2015 in the Shiraz Organ Transplant Center, Iran. The demographic data, kidney function, recurrence, resistance rate, and acute rejections at 1-, 6-, and 12-month intervals and after 12 months were compared on TDF (n=209) and lamivudine (n=93) groups.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 42.9 months, mean creatinine level was not significantly different between the two groups. Hepatitis B virus recurrence rate as well as acute graft rejection episode had no statistical difference in either group over the study period.

CONCLUSION

Kidney function, creatinine level, disease recurrence, and acute graft rejection were comparable between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine in patients who received follow-up periods.

The Impact of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate on Reduced Bone Mineral Density and Fractures in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is associated with reduced bone density in patients with human immunodeficiency virus, but the effect of TDF on bone density in liver transplant (LT) recipients is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective study of LT recipients with hepatitis B taking TDF compared to a control group with non-hepatitis B virus viral hepatitis. The primary outcome was reduced bone density, defined as femoral neck or lumbar T-score less than -1. Other outcomes included mean T-score and fractures.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-three patients were studied: 52 patients in the TDF group and 341 patients in the control group; 64.3% patients in the TDF group had reduced bone density vs 71.4% in the control group (P = .58) before LT, compared to 75% and 81.5% (P = .57), respectively, after LT. Mean posttransplant lumbar T-scores were lower in the TDF group (-1.74 vs -0.75, P = .04). There was no difference between the 2 groups for the other outcomes. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, TDF use did not affect the risk of post-LT reduced bone density (hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.76; P = .97).

CONCLUSION

TDF use was not associated with reduced bone mineral density or increased rates of fractures in LT recipients compared to controls in this study.

Significance of Hepatitis B Recurrence in Liver Transplantation Recipients

Background

A combination of antihepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral agents is the most common regimen for prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. However, hepatitis B recurrence still happens. The significance of hepatitis B recurrence is less mentioned.

Materials

Forty-eight of the 313 hepatitis B liver transplant recipients having hepatitis B recurrence were included in this study. The patients were divided into group A, the patients transplanted for hepatitis B-related liver failure, and group B, the patients transplanted for hepatitis B-related cirrhosis and HCC. The clinical manifestations after hepatitis B recurrence were recorded.

Results

Among the 48 patients with hepatitis B recurrence, 23 patients were in group A and 25 patients in group B. The age was 51.6 ± 9.4 years in group A and 52.8 ± 6.4 in group B (p = 0.869). The MELD score prior to transplantation was 23.1 ± 9.9 in group A patients and 12.9 ± 5.6 in group B patients (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile) interval from transplantation to hepatitis B recurrence was 10 (2-19) months for group A patients and 13 (8.5-35) months for group B patients (p = 0.051). After hepatitis B recurrence, the liver function was almost normal in both groups. In group B patients, 10 patients had HCC recurrence with 7 of 10 patients having hepatitis B recurrence earlier than HCC recurrence. The interval between hepatitis B and HCC recurrence was 1 to 15 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 82.6%, 73.9%, and 69.0%, respectively, for group A patients and 96%, 76%, and 68%, respectively, for group B patients (p = 0.713).

Conclusion

The patients have uneventful liver function under antiviral agent while hepatitis B recurred. For the patients having HCC prior to transplantation, close monitoring of HCC recurrence is necessary if hepatitis B recurs.

Liver transplantation for Hepatitis-B-associated liver disease - Three decades of experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B (HBV)-associated end-stage liver disease used to be a relevant indication for liver transplantation (LT). After transplantation, HBV-reinfection remains a serious issue. Different strategies to prevent HBV-reinfection range from the single application of immunoglobulins (HBIG), to the use of modern nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NUC) in combination with HBIG, followed by HBIG-discontinuation. The aim of this analysis was to compare different strategies and to sum up the results of 30 years at a high-volume transplant center and deliver additional information on the histopathological level.

METHODS

Data of 372 liver transplantations performed for the HBV-induced liver disease in 352 patients were extracted from a prospectively organized database. HBV-reinfection was determined in the entire cohort, according to the mode of HBV-prophylaxis. Differences in survival rates were analyzed in patients with successful prophylaxis, untreated and controlled HBV-reinfection. Histopathological results were obtained from protocol biopsies in 151 patients.

RESULTS

HBV-reinfection was significantly associated with the type of prophylaxis, presence of HBs-Antigen at the moment of LT, transplant year and influencing the overall survival before 2005. After the introduction of modern NUCs, HBV-reinfection stopped to impact HBV-associated transplant loss and survival. Controlled HBV-infection prevents from HBV-associated transplant hepatitis and fibrosis development. The role of HBIG declines in favor of NUCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncontrolled HBV-reinfection does not occur any more. Even in the presence of Hbs-antigen, transplant fibrosis does not develop. The most reliable mode to prevent HBV-recurrence remains the combination of NUCs with a high genetic barrier and HBIG. However, HBIG can safely be discontinued after LT.

The association between donor genetic variations in one-carbon metabolism pathway genes and hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUNDS AND AIM

Hepatitis B recurrence adversely affects patients' survival after liver transplantation. This study aims to find association between donor gene variations of one carbon metabolism and post-transplant hepatitis B recurrence.

METHODS

This study enrolled 196 patients undergoing liver transplantation for HBV related end-stage liver diseases. We detected 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of 7 one-carbon metabolism pathway genes (including MTHFR, MTR, MTRR, ALDH1L1, GART, SHMT1 and CBS) in donor livers and analyzed their association with HBV reinfection after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Hepatitis B recurrence was observed in 19 of the 196 patients (9.7%) undergoing liver transplantation. Hepatitis B recurrence significantly affected post-transplant survival in the 196 patients (p = 0.018), and correlate with tumor recurrence in the subgroup of HCC patients (n = 99, p = 0.006). Among the 11 SNPs, donor liver mutation in rs1979277 (G > A) was adversely associated with post-transplant hepatitis B recurrence (p = 0.042). In the subgroup of HCC patients, survival analysis showed donor liver mutations in rs1801133 (G > A) and rs1979277 (G > A) were risk factors for hepatitis B recurrence (p < 0.05). None of the 11 SNPs was related to hepatitis B recurrence in non-HCC patients (n = 97, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis B recurrence impaired post-transplant survival. Donor liver genetic variations in one-carbon metabolism pathway genes were significantly associated with post-transplant hepatitis B recurrence.

Pre- and Post-Transplant Antiviral Therapy (HBV, HCV)

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated liver cirrhosis is a major indication for liver transplantation. This concise review gives an overview about current interferon (IFN)-free treatment options before and after liver transplantation in HBV- or HCV-associated liver disease.

METHODS

A PubMed database search using the terms hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cirrhosis, and liver transplantation was performed to identify significant clinical studies as well as national and international guidelines.

RESULTS

Studies investigating IFN-free treatment in patients with decompensated HBV as well as in HCV-associated cirrhosis are scarce. Hepatic recompensation during antiviral therapy seems more frequent in patients with HBV than in those with HCV-associated cirrhosis. Graft hepatitis B or C is characterized by an accelerated and unfavorable course. Graft infection prophylaxis is safe and efficacious in HBV-related liver transplantation. Eradication of HCV prior to liver transplantation prevents HCV graft infection, and IFN-free treatment of established HCV graft infection is safe and associated with high sustained virologic response rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HBV-associated cirrhosis should be treated prior to liver transplantation, and receive a continuing graft infection prophylaxis thereafter. Patients with HCV-associated decompensated cirrhosis may be considered as candidates for antiviral therapy prior to liver transplantation or may be treated subsequently.

Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues (NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients' condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBcAb-positive liver grafts.

Intravenous immunoglobulins in liver transplant patients: Perspectives of clinical immune modulation

Shortage of appropriate donor grafts is the foremost current problem in organ transplantation. As a logical consequence, waiting times have extended and pretransplant mortality rates were significantly increasing. The implementation of a priority-based liver allocation system using the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score helped to reduce waiting list mortality in liver transplantation (LT). However, due to an escalating organ scarcity, pre-LT MELD scores have significantly increased and liver recipients became more complex in recent years. This has finally led to posttransplant decreasing survival rates, attributed mainly to elevated rates of infectious and immunologic complications. To meet this challenging development, an increasing number of extended criteria donor grafts are currently accepted, which may, however, aggravate the patients’ infectious and immunologic risk profiles. The administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) is an established treatment in patients with immune deficiencies and other antibody-mediated diseases. In addition, IVIg was shown to be useful in treatment of several disorders caused by deterioration of the cellular immune system. It proved to be effective in preventing hyperacute rejection in highly sensitized kidney and heart transplants. In the liver transplant setting, the administration of specific Ig against hepatitis B virus is current standard in post-LT antiviral prophylaxis. The mechanisms of action of IVIg are complex and not fully understood. However, there is increasing experimental and clinical evidence that IVIg has an immuno-balancing impact by a combination of immuno-supporting and immuno-suppressive properties. It may be suggested that, especially in the context of a worsening organ shortage with all resulting clinical implications, liver transplant patients should benefit from immuno-regulatory capabilities of IVIg. In this review, perspectives of immune modulation by IVIg and impact on outcome in liver transplant patients are described.