Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors associated with gastroenteropancreatic mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in Chinese patients

Survival and Metastatic Lymph Node Patterns in Gastric Carcinoma with Exocrine and Neuroendocrine Components

BACKGROUND

Gastric carcinoma with coexisting exocrine and neuroendocrine components (GC-EN) is a rare and aggressive subtype of gastric cancer that presents unique challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. The effect of lymph node metastasis with different components on survival in patients with GC-EN is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 98 patients diagnosed with GC-EN at the China National Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2020. GC-EN was classified into NEC-dominant, mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC), and AC-dominant based on the proportion of adenocarcinoma (AC) and neuroendocrine (NEC) components. Additionally, lymph nodes were categorized into NEC, AC, and MANEC types based on cellular composition.

RESULTS

Of the 98 patients, 30 developed NEC-dominant type, 39 (39.8%) developed MANEC type, and 29 (29.6%) developed AC-dominant type. Additionally, 72.48% of the patients developed lymph node metastasis. The incidence rates of lymph node metastasis were significantly higher among patients with the NEC-dominant (76.6%, 23/30) and MANEC types (74.3%, 29/39) than among those with the ACC-dominant type (65.5%, 19/29; P < 0.05). Pathological T stage was a key factor influencing lymph node metastasis of NEC components in patients with GC-EN. Survival analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis significantly worsened the prognosis of patients with GC-EN (P < 0.05). Analysis of lymph node metastasis with different components on prognosis revealed that patients with GC-EN with lymph node metastasis of NEC components were associated with a significantly poorer prognosis than those without lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio 2.341, 95% confidence interval 1.125-4.871, P = 0.023), while patients with GC-EN with lymph node metastasis of MANEC and AC components exhibited no significant statistical differences. A new N staging system was developed on the basis of the number and different compositions of lymph node metastasis. The new N staging system demonstrated a higher C-index than the AJCC N staging system (0.739 vs. 0.719).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis of NEC components is significantly associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with GC-EN. This study proposes a new N staging system that integrates lymph node count and components, potentially facilitating prognostic stratification and personalized treatment for patients with GC-EN.

Development of a Nomogram-Based Online Calculator for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients With Digestive Tract Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): An Analysis of the SEER Database

AIMS

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare and heterogeneous subgroup of neoplasms that typically consist of a neuroendocrine (NE) component, most commonly neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), alongside a non-neuroendocrine (non-NE) component. They commonly occur in the digestive tract, and their prognosis is influenced by multiple factors. This article aimed to identify factors that affect the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of MiNENs and develop an effective nomogram-based online calculator to validate its effectiveness.

METHODS

The clinical, pathological, epidemiological, and survival data of patients with digestive tract MiNENs were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning from 2000 to 2020. Then, the dataset was divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. The χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was utilized to assess differences in demographic and clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were employed to conduct survival analysis. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors and develop nomograms and an online calculator for predicting CSS at 1, 3, and 5 years. Lastly, the predictive ability of the online calculator was subsequently compared with the sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system using the Harrell concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, namely, the training cohort (n = 231) and the validation cohort (n = 99). The log-rank test revealed a significant association between the lower cumulative survival and age ≥ 65 years, poor tumor grade, lack of surgical treatment, TNM stages III and IV, and distant metastasis. In the training cohort, a nomogram incorporating grade, surgery, TNM stage, and tumor metastasis was developed, which demonstrated favorable calibration and discriminatory capabilities. Compared to TNM staging, the nomogram exhibited satisfactory performance in predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year CSS rates. The C-index value was 0.787 in the training cohort and 0.738 in the validation cohort, respectively. In the training cohort, the nomogram achieved an AUC of 85.81%, 85.86%, and 87.32% for 1-year CSS, 3-year CSS, and 5-year CSS, respectively. In contrast, these AUC values were 78.46%, 81.50%, and 83.88% in the validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed online calculator offers a novel approach to predicting the prognosis of patients with digestive tract MiNENs. Indeed, it can accurately predict the CSS of these patients over 1, 3, and 5 years, thereby assisting in enhancing prognosis and formulating appropriate treatment strategies.

Characterizing esophageal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms: insights from a retrospective multicenter study of clinical outcomes and prognostic indicators

Background

The esophageal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is an extremely rare but poor prognosis tumor.

Objectives

This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of MiNEN and to investigate postoperative survival and prognostic factors.

Design

This retrospective study analyzed 69 patients diagnosed with esophageal MiNEN at two major esophageal cancer centers in China from January 2000 to December 2021.

Methods

We assessed demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models to evaluate prognostic factors.

Results

The most common histological types were combinations of small-cell carcinoma and squamous carcinoma (91.3%). The correct diagnostic rate of preoperative pathologic biopsy was only 4.3%. The median overall survival (OS) was 24.0 months, and disease-free survival (DFS) was 16.6 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 84.1%, 34.8%, and 25.3%, respectively. A peak period of recurrence or metastasis occurs in the first year after surgery, and regional lymph node recurrence is the main route of postoperative recurrence or metastasis. Tumor size, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) stage were significant prognostic factors. Subgroup analyses showed that in patients with limited-stage MiNEN in stages I-III, the postoperative adjuvant treatment modality failed to improve OS and DFS compared with surgery alone. Postoperative adjuvant therapy also failed to prolong OS and DFS in patients with lymph node-positive MiNEN. No significant survival benefits were observed with different surgical techniques or adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Conclusion

Esophageal MiNEN has aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. In China, the pathologic type of esophageal MiNEN may be dominated by a combination of small-cell carcinoma and squamous carcinoma. Early-stage disease significantly correlated with improved survival outcomes. Current treatment protocols, similar to those for other esophageal cancers, show limited efficacy in improving patient survival.

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas and Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The pathogenesis of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) in the gastrointestinal tract remains poorly understood. This study aims to characterize the clinicopathologic and molecular features of NEC/MiNEN in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Eighteen surgically resected IBD-associated intestinal carcinomas with a minimum of 30% neuroendocrine component were collected from 6 academic centers and compared with a control group of 12 IBD-associated carcinomas lacking neuroendocrine differentiation. Both groups exhibited a male predominance and similar age distribution. The NEC/MiNEN group was more likely to have a higher percentage of Crohn disease (9/18 vs 1/12; P = .024), occur in the rectum (9/18 vs 3/12) and small intestine (4/18 vs 0/12) (P < .01), be diagnosed on resection without a preceding biopsy (6/18 vs 0/12; P = .057), and have unidentifiable precursor lesions (10/18 vs 1/12; P = .018) than the control group. Synchronous carcinoma, advanced tumor stage (pT3 and pT4), and lymph node metastasis occurred at similar rates; however, the NEC/MiNEN group had a higher incidence of angiovascular invasion (14/18 vs 4/12; P = .024), distant metastasis (8/18 vs 1/12; P = .049), mortality (8/18 vs 2/12; P = .058), and worse survival (Kaplan-Meier; P = .023) than the control group. All tested cases were mismatch repair proficient. A Ki-67 proliferation index ranged from 25% to 100%. Next-generation sequencing in 11 NEC/MiNEN cases revealed low tumor mutational burdens but complex genetic abnormalities commonly involving TP53 (9/11; 82%), FBXW7 (4/11; 36%), and APC (3/11; 27%) genes, with the other genetic alterations randomly occurring in 1 or 2 cases. The neuroendocrine component, which shared similar molecular alterations as the nonneuroendocrine component, was subcategorized into intermediate (G3a) and high grade (G3b); the higher grade correlated with more genetic alterations. In conclusion, IBD-associated NEC/MiNEN shows diverse histologic features, variable precursor lesions, intricate genetic abnormalities, and aggressive biologic behavior. The classification and grading of gastrointestinal NEC/MiNEN may be refined for better clinical management.

Mixed neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma of gastrointestinal tract: A complex diagnosis and therapeutic challenge

In this editorial we comment on the manuscript describing a case of adenocarcinoma mixed with a neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal system are rare heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by a high malignant potential, rapid growth, and poor prognosis. Due to the rarity of these cancers, the standard therapy is poorly defined. The diagnosis of these tumors is based on combination of morphological features, immunohistochemical and neuroendocrine and epithelial cell markers. Both endocrine and epithelial cell components can act independently of each other and thus, careful grading of each component separately is required. These cancers are aggressive in nature and the potential of each component has paramount importance in the choice of treatment and response. Regardless of the organ of origin, these tumors portend poor prognosis with increased proportion of neuroendocrine component. Multidisciplinary services and strategies are required for the management of these mixed malignancies to provide the best oncological outcomes. The etiopathogenesis of these mixed tumors remains obscure but poses interesting question. We briefly discuss a few salient points in this editorial.

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

The uncommon tumour known as gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-MiNENs) is made up of parts of neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The biological and clinical features are different from those of gastric adenocarcinoma. Their pathophysiology, diagnostic standards, and clinical behaviour have all been the subject of lengthy debates, and their nomenclature has undergone multiple changes. Its emergence has created new challenges in the classification and diagnosis of gastric tumours. This review will update information on the topic, covering molecular aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognostic factor discovery. It will also provide a historical context that will aid in understanding the evolution of the idea and nomenclature of mixed gastric tumours. Additionally, it will provide the reader a thorough understanding of this difficult topic of cancer that is applicable to real-world situations.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comprehensive analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic implications of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

METHODS

A retrospective enrollment of 142 patients diagnosed with g-NENs was conducted at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021. The study compared essential clinicopathological features and survival rates. Additionally, the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas/mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NEC/MiNEN) were contrasted with those of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).

RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 142 g-NENs cases, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. The 5-year survival rates for g-NEC and g-MiNEN were 26.7% and 35.2%, respectively. Corresponding 5-year survival rates for G1 and G2 were observed at 100% and 80.0%, respectively. g-NEC/MiNEN showed a significantly worse prognosis compared to g-NET (p < 0.001). g-NEC/MiNEN exhibited a poor prognosis compared to GAC (p < 0.001), and within poorly differentiated GAC, g-NEC/MiNEN demonstrated a worse prognosis (p = 0.007). Additionally, patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy exhibited notably prolonged overall survival (OS) in the case of g-NEC/MiNEN (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

In short, the prognosis of g-NEC/MiNEN was worse than that of g-NET, GAC and poorly differentiated GAC, but this group benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Incidence, survival, and prognostic factors for patients with gastrointestinal mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms: a SEER population-based study

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a group of rare tumors with limited research currently available. This study aimed to analyze the incidence, survival, and prognostic factors of gastrointestinal MiNENs.

METHODS

We included data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2019. We compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival rates between MiNENs and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and calculated the incidence of MiNENs. We utilized univariate and multivariate Cox analysis to assess independent factors of prognosis and established a nomogram to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS). Calibration and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to validate the accuracy and reliability of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical utility of the model.

RESULTS

Patients with gastrointestinal MiNENs had a poorer prognosis than those with NETs. The overall incidence of gastrointestinal MiNENs has been increasing annually. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and surgery were independent risk factors for CSS in MiNENs patients. Based on these risk factors, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year CSS nomogram model for MiNENs patients was established. Calibration, ROC, and DCA curves of the training and validation sets demonstrated that this model had good accuracy and clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

Gastrointestinal MiNENs are rare tumors with an increasing incidence rate. The nomogram model is expected to be an effective tool for personalized prognosis prediction in MiNENs patients, which may benefit clinical decision-making.

From morphology to molecular targets—the pathologist’s view in diagnosing gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

In the last decade, a number of genetic alterations in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) have been identified. In addition, differences in tumor morphology as well as proliferation index (Ki-67) or number of mitoses have led to changes in the classification of these neoplasms. According to the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification, GEP-NENs are now divided into two genetically and prognostically different categories: (i) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) subdivided into low (G1), intermediate (2) and high (G3) grade tumors, and (ii) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). In addition, a group of mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) has been defined. This review focuses on the clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular findings of the GEP-NENs and their key diagnostic features that can help the pathologist to differentiate between tumors in this heterogeneous group. In challenging cases, additional immunohistochemical and/or molecular analysis can be helpful to determine the correct diagnosis and proper treatment for the patient.

Novel staging for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms by incorporating the WHO grading into the TNM staging system

BACKGROUND

The 8th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) can be used to estimate the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine tumor (gNET) and gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (gNEC) patients but not gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (gNENs).

METHODS

First, in the SEER (training) dataset, a TNMG system was built by combining the WHO G grade (G1-4; NEC grouped into G4) with the 8th AJCC T (T1-4), N (N0-1), and M (M0-1) stage, which was then validated in a Chinese (validation) cohort.

RESULTS

In all, 2245 gNENs cases from the training dataset and 280 cases from the validation dataset were eligible. The T stage, M stage, and G grade were independent prognostic factors for OS in both datasets (all p < 0.05). The TNMG staging system demonstrated better C-index for predicting OS than the 8th AJCC TNM staging system in both the training (0.87, 95%CI: 0.86-0.88 vs. 0.79, 95%CI: 0.77-0.81) and validation (0.77, 95%CI: 0.73-0.80 vs. 0.75, 95%CI: 0.71-0.79) datasets. The AUC of the 3-year OS for the TNMG staging system was 0.936 and 0.817 in the SEER and validation dataset, respectively; higher than those of the 8th AJCC system (vs. 0.843 and 0.779, respectively). DCA revealed that compared with the 8th AJCC TNM staging system, the TNMG staging system demonstrated superior net prognostic benefit in both the training and validation datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed TNMG staging system could more accurately predict the 3- and 5-year OS rate of gNENs patients than the 8th AJCC TNM staging system.

Clinicopathological Features of Neuroendocrine Tumors in Gastroenteropancreatic Tract: A Single Center Study

Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying biological, functional, and clinical characteristics that develop from the gastroenteropancreatic tract's diffuse neuroendocrine system. The objective of this study is to determine the clinicopathological features of GEP-NETs at our facility.

Methodology: A cross-sectional analysis of 87 biopsies and resection specimens from January 2020 to January 2022 was performed. The histopathological reports as well as patient's demographic and clinic pathological data were obtained. Two pathologists with a special interest in gastroenteropancreatic pathology blindly reviewed all cases. The tumor grade and stage were determined using the WHO classification (2019) and the AJCC TNM system (8th edition). The data were analyzed with SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results: Of the total 87 patients, 49 (56.3%) were male. The age range was 11 to 80 years, with a mean of 45.7±16.4 and the majority (56.3%) were under 50 years. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain (55.2%). The most common site of GEP-NETs was the appendix (21.8%), followed by the ileum (18.4%), with the majority of tumors being non-functional (96.5%). Furthermore, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) grade 1 accounts for 62% of the total, followed by NET grade 2 (24.1%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NET) grade 3 (10.3%), and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MINENs) (3.5%). Synaptophysin was found to be positive in 83.9% cases while Chromogranin A was positive in 39.1%. A pathologic tumor (pT) stage was determined in 47 resection specimens in our study and the most common stage was pT3 (36.1%). Nodal metastasis was found in 25.5% of patients.

Conclusions: According to our study, appendix and ileum were the most common GEP-NETs sites. The tumor site and grade were shown to significantly correlate among the clinicopathological features but there was no discernible correlation between the tumor grade and the gender, age, or pathological tumor (pT) stage.

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm of the ampulla: Four case reports

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare tumor that occurs in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas, usually composed of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma. MiNEN occurring in ampulla is even rarer. We report 4 cases of MiNEN in ampulla, combined with literature review to summarize the clinical features and treatment of the disease, in order to improve the understanding of the disease.

CASE SUMMARY

A retrospective analysis was performed in 4 cases of MiNEN of the ampulla diagnosed by pathology from 2014 to 2021. The 4 patients were all male, aged 67-81 years (average 72.25 years). Among them, 2 patients had jaundice, 1 patient had abdominal pain, and 1 patient had jaundice with abdominal pain as the first symptom. All 4 patients underwent enhanced CT or MRI, which all indicated that the tumors were located in the ampulla. Two patients underwent duodenoscopy, and a biopsy revealed ampullary adenocarcinoma. All 4 patients underwent radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. Four cases were followed up: One patient developed severe complications after the operation, his condition deteriorated, and he survived for 1 mo. In the other 3 patients, tumor recurrence was observed during follow-up, and 2 of them survived for 29 mo and 22 mo respectively. One case survived and is still being followed up.

CONCLUSION

MiNEN of the ampulla are extremely rare, lacking typical clinical symptoms and imaging features, and are usually diagnosed after postoperative histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations. The main treatment is radical surgical resection, which can be combined with chemotherapy. The best method of diagnosis and treatment needs further research.

Mixed neuroendocrine–nonneuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal system: An update

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the digestive tract are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors that present many challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Over the years, the diagnostic criteria, classification, and clinical behavior of these tumors have been the subjects of ongoing debate, and the various changes in their nomenclature have strengthened the challenges associated with MiNENs. This review is performed to provide an understanding of the key factors involved in the evolution of the designation of these tumors as MiNEN, highlight the current diagnostic criteria, summarize the latest data on pathogenesis and provide information on available treatments. Moreover, this work seeks to increase the awareness about these rare neoplasms by presenting the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors that play important roles in their behavior and discussing their different regions of origin in the gastrointestinal system (GIS). Currently, the MiNEN category also includes tumors in the GIS with a nonneuroendocrine component and epithelial tumors other than adenocarcinoma, depending on the organ of origin. Diagnosis is based on the presence of both morphological components in more than 30% of the tumor. However, this value needs to be reconfirmed with further studies and may be a limiting factor in the diagnosis of MiNEN by biopsy. Furthermore, available clinicopathological data suggest that the inclusion of amphicrine tumors in the definition of MiNEN is not supportive and warrants further investigation. The diagnosis of these tumors is not solely based on immunohistochemical findings. They are not hybrid tumors and both components can act independently; thus, careful grading of each component separately is required. In addition to parameters such as the metastatic state of the tumor at the time of diagnosis and the feasibility of surgical resection, the aggressive potential of both components has paramount importance in the choice of treatment. Regardless of the organ of origin within the GIS, almost MiNENs are tumors with poor prognosis and are frequently encountered in the elderly and men. They are most frequently reported in the colorectum, where data from molecular studies indicate a monoclonal origin; however, further studies are required to provide additional support for this origin.