Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis

Ultrasound shear wave viscoelastography to characterize liver nodules

Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US)-based shear wave speed (SWS), shear wave attenuation (SWA), and combination of them as shear wave viscoelastography (SWVE) methods in patients undergoing US to characterize focal liver nodules.Materials and methods. In this prospective cross-sectional study, 70 patients with 72 nodules were enrolled. Investigational US and clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed in all participants. The composite reference standard included MRI or histopathology to differentiate benign and malignant nodules. A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to assess the combination of SWVE methods. Analyzes included Mann-WhitneyUtest, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and computation of sensitivity and specificity at the point that maximized the Youden index.Results. Mean SWS was significantly higher in malignant than benign nodules (2.49 ± 0.76 m s-1vs. 1.72 ± 0.70,p< 0.001), whereas SWA was lower (0.56 ± 0.30 vs. 1.10 ± 0.43 Np/m/Hz,p< 0.001). To differentiate between malignant and benign nodules, SWS with a threshold of 2.43 m s-1achieved a sensitivity of 0.54 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.69) and a specificity of 0.88 (CI: 0.74-0.95). SWA with a threshold of 0.81 Np/m/Hz yielded a sensitivity of 0.81 (CI: 0.66-0.90) and a specificity of 0.74 (CI: 0.58-0.86). Combining these SWVE methods using a LDA resulted in a sensitivity of 0.81 (CI: 0.66-0.91) and a specificity of 0.86 (CI: 0.71-0.94).Conclusion. Malignant nodules had higher SWS and lower SWA than benign ones. The combination of SWS and SWA in a LDA classification algorithm increased the diagnostic performance.

Management of intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Guidelines of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF)

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common malignant primary liver cancer. iCCA may develop on an underlying chronic liver disease and its incidence is growing in relation with the epidemics of obesity and metabolic diseases. In contrast, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) may follow a history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the biliary tract. The initial management of CCAs is often complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise. The French Association for the Study of the Liver wished to organize guidelines in order to summarize the best evidence available about several key points in iCCA and pCCA. These guidelines have been elaborated based on the level of evidence available in the literature and each recommendation has been analysed, discussed and voted by the panel of experts. They describe the epidemiology of CCA as well as how patients with iCCA or pCCA should be managed from diagnosis to treatment. The most recent developments of personalized medicine and use of targeted therapies are also highlighted.

CEUS LI-RADS in Combination With the Serum Biomarker-Based ASAP Model Improves the Diagnostic Performance of HCC in High-Risk Patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic efficacy of the CEUS LI-RADS combined with a model constructed on the basis of age, sex, AFP, and PIVKA-II (ASAP) for the diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 366 liver lesions from 366 patients who underwent liver CEUS. All liver lesions were characterized and categorized according to CEUS LI-RADS v2017. Two modified methods were applied: LR-3/4/M nodules accompanied by AFP > 200 ng/mL (Criterion 2) or ASAP model score > 0.5256 and CA 19-9 in the normal range (Criterion 3) were recategorized as LR-5. The reference criteria included histopathological or comprehensive imaging and the clinical follow-up results. The diagnostic performance was evaluated and compared by the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV.

RESULTS

The incidence of HCC in LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M was 33.3% (4/12), 86.4% (38/44), 98.5% (191/194) and 82.7% (81/98), respectively. After using Criterion 2 compared to CEUS LI-RADS v2017, the sensitivity of the modified LR-5 for diagnosing HCC increased from 60.8% to 70.7% (p < 0.01) with little effect on its specificity (94.2% vs. 92.3%, p = 1.00) or PPV (98.5% vs. 98.2%, p = 0.86). After using Criterion 3, the sensitivity of the modified LR-5 for the diagnosis of HCC was further improved to 86.9% (p < 0.01), and its specificity and PPV were not significantly changed (92.3% and 98.6%, both p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS LI-RADS combined with the serum biomarker-based ASAP model improved the sensitivity of LR-5 in diagnosing HCC with little effect on its specificity and PPV.

Comparison of 2D Shear Wave Elastography and Transient Elastography in Non-Invasive Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis C Virus-Related Chronic Liver Disease

Background: Transient Elastography (TE) is widely regarded as the most reliable non-invasive method for evaluating liver fibrosis. Recently, new techniques such as 2D Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between TE and 2D-SWE in patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease and to redefine the cut-off values of 2D-SWE for predicting different stages of fibrosis based on our results. Methods: Both TE (Fibroscan, Echosens, Paris, France) and 2D-SWE (SuperSonic Imagine) were performed simultaneously in 170 patients, including those with active and eradicated HCV infection. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the two measurements, and the concordance between the assigned METAVIR classes was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. ROC curves were constructed to determine the optimal cut-off values for 2D-SWE. Results: Ten patients were excluded for invalid measurements. In the remaining 160 patients, TE and 2D-SWE demonstrated a high correlation (ρ = 0.83, p < 0.0001) and good agreement in METAVIR classification (k = 0.74). The optimal cut-off values identified for 2D-SWE were as follows: ≥ 7 kPa for F ≥ 2, ≥ 8.3 kPa for F ≥ 3, and ≥ 9.4 kPa for F4. Conclusions: 2D-SWE is a viable alternative to TE for patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease. Our data suggest that the currently accepted 2D-SWE cut-off values for cirrhosis (F4) should be reconsidered and potentially lowered.

Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other liver cancer (i.e. cholangiocarcinoma or metastasis) is highly challenging and definitive diagnosis still relies on histological exam. The patterns of enhancement and wash-out of liver nodules can be used to stratify the risk of malignancy only in cirrhotic patients and HCC frequently shows atypical features. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) with standardized software could help to overcome these obstacles, providing functional and quantitative parameters and potentially improving accuracy in the evaluation of tumor perfusion.

AIM

To explore clinical evidence regarding the application of DCEUS in the differential diagnosis of liver nodules.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to identify the parameters of DCEUS that could relate to histological diagnosis. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned.

RESULTS

Rise time was significantly higher in HCC patients with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.48-1.18). Similarly, other statistically significant parameters were mean transit time local with a SMD of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.20-1.27), peak enhancement with a SMD of 0.37 (95%CI: 0.03-0.70), area wash-in area under the curve with a SMD of 0.47 (95%CI: 0.13-0.81), wash-out area under the curve with a SMD of 0.55 (95%CI: 0.21-0.89) and wash-in and wash-out area under the curve with SMD of 0.51 (95%CI: 0.17-0.85). SMD resulted not significant in fall time and wash-in rate, but the latter presented a trend towards greater values in HCC compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

DCEUS could improve non-invasive diagnosis of HCC, leading to less liver biopsy and early treatment. This quantitative analysis needs to be applied on larger cohorts to confirm these preliminary results.

Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other liver cancer (i.e. cholangiocarcinoma or metastasis) is highly challenging and definitive diagnosis still relies on histological exam. The patterns of enhancement and wash-out of liver nodules can be used to stratify the risk of malignancy only in cirrhotic patients and HCC frequently shows atypical features. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) with standardized software could help to overcome these obstacles, providing functional and quantitative parameters and potentially improving accuracy in the evaluation of tumor perfusion.

AIM

To explore clinical evidence regarding the application of DCEUS in the differential diagnosis of liver nodules.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to identify the parameters of DCEUS that could relate to histological diagnosis. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned.

RESULTS

Rise time was significantly higher in HCC patients with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.48-1.18). Similarly, other statistically significant parameters were mean transit time local with a SMD of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.20-1.27), peak enhancement with a SMD of 0.37 (95%CI: 0.03-0.70), area wash-in area under the curve with a SMD of 0.47 (95%CI: 0.13-0.81), wash-out area under the curve with a SMD of 0.55 (95%CI: 0.21-0.89) and wash-in and wash-out area under the curve with SMD of 0.51 (95%CI: 0.17-0.85). SMD resulted not significant in fall time and wash-in rate, but the latter presented a trend towards greater values in HCC compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

DCEUS could improve non-invasive diagnosis of HCC, leading to less liver biopsy and early treatment. This quantitative analysis needs to be applied on larger cohorts to confirm these preliminary results.

Current Trends and Advancements in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health burden with a high mortality rate. Over the past 40 years, significant progress has been achieved in the prevention and management of HCC.

SUMMARY

Hepatitis B vaccination programs, the development of direct acting antiviral drugs for Hepatitis C, and effective surveillance strategies provide a profound basis for the prevention of HCC. Advanced surgery and liver transplantation along with local ablation techniques potentially offer cure for the disease. Also, just recently, the introduction of immunotherapy opened a new chapter in systemic treatment. Finally, the introduction of the BCLC classification system for HCC, clearly defining patient groups and assigning reasonable treatment options, has standardized treatment and become the basis of almost all clinical trials for HCC. With this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of HCC management and also touch on current challenges.

KEY MESSAGE

A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for effective HCC management. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to further enhance treatment options and will ultimately reduce the global burden of this devastating disease.

The comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI LI-RADS for nodules ≤2 cm in patients at high risk for HCC: a prospective study

Objectives

To investigate the consistency of LI-RADS of CEUS and EOB-MRI in the categorization of liver nodules ≤2cm in patients at high risk for HCC.

Methods

Patients at high risk for HCC with nodules ≤2cm who underwent CEUS and EOB-MRI in our hospital were prospectively enrolled. The CEUS images and EOB-MRI imaging of each liver nodule were observed to evaluate inter-observer consistency and category according to CEUS LI-RADS V2017 and CT/MRI LI-RADS V2017 criteria double blinded. Pathology and/or follow-up were used as reference standard.

Results

A total of 127 nodules in 119 patients met the inclusion criteria. The inter-observer agreement was good on CEUS and EOB-MRI LI-RADS (kappa = 0.76, 0.76 p < 0.001). The inter-modality agreement was fair (kappa=0.21, p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in PPV and specificity between CEUS and EOB-MRI LR-5 for HCC, while the difference in AUC was statistically significant. We used new criteria (CEUS LR-5 and EOB-MRI LR-4/5 or CEUS LR-4/5 and EOB-MRI LR-5) to diagnose HCC. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of this criteria was 63.4%, 95.6%, and 0.80.

Conclusions

CEUS and EOB-MRI showed fair inter-modality agreement in LI-RADS categorization of nodules ≤2 cm. The inter-observer agreement of CEUS and EOB-MRI LI-RADS were substantial. CEUS and EOB-MRI LR-5 have equally good positive predictive value and specificity for HCC ≤ 2cm, and combining these two modalities may better diagnose HCC ≤ 2 cm.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04212286.

Differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasonography combined with multiphase enhanced computed tomography

Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are primary liver cancers with different therapeutic methods and prognoses. This study aims to investigate the ultrasonography and enhanced computed tomography (CT) features of these cancers and improve the early diagnosis rate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of 319 patients diagnosed with HCC and 124 patients diagnosed with ICC, confirmed by pathology. Results: A total of 443 patients were eligible in this study. From the perspective of clinical data, between HCC and ICC patients existed significant differences in age, gender, hepatic background, serum tumor markers of AFP and CA19.9, chronic hepatitis B/C and lymph node infiltration (p<0.05), but not in tumor size, microvascular invasion, serum tumor markers of CEA and CA125 (P>0.05). With respect to ultrasonography features, HCC patients had a higher proportion than ICC patients in splenomegaly (p=0.001), while ICC patients had a higher proportion than HCC patients in absence/not rich vascularity and intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (p<0.05). With respect to CT features, HCC patients were significantly different from ICC patients in the three-phase enhanced CT value mean, enhanced intensity and homogeneity of nodules (P<0.05). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to further clarify the correlation of these indices. However, only age≤60 years (OR=1.861, P=0.045), male (OR=3.850, P<0.001), AFP>7ng/ml (OR=0.119, P<0.001), lymph node infiltration (OR=5.968, P<0.001), intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (OR=2.414, P=0.04), splenomegaly (OR=0.081, P<0.001), rim APHE (OR=3.109, P=0.002), and iso- or hyper enhancement (OR=0.188, P<0.001) were independent risk factors. Conclusions: While there are overlapping ultrasonography and CT features between HCC and ICC, the integration of tumor markers and specific imaging characteristics can be beneficial in distinguishing between the two.

Compared with SonoVue® LR-5, Sonazoid® modified LR-5 has better diagnostic sensitivity for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a standardized system for reporting liver nodules in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is only recommended for pure blood pool agents such as SonoVue®. A modified LI-RADS was proposed for Sonazoid®, a Kupffer cell-specific contrast agent. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the diagnostic efficiency of the CEUS LI-RADS for SonoVue® and the modified LI-RADS for Sonazoid®.

Methods

The PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to retrieve studies on the diagnostic efficiency of the CEUS LI-RADS algorithms in diagnosing HCC using SonoVue® and/or Sonazoid® from January 2016 to June 2023. Histopathology or imaging follow-up served as the reference standards. Only articles published in English on retrospective or prospective studies with full reports were included in the meta-analysis. A bivariate random-effects model was used. Data pooling, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were performed for the meta-analysis. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test was used to evaluate publication bias, and the QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies.

Results

In total, 26 studies comprising 8,495 patients with 9,244 lesions were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled data results for SonoVue® LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and Sonazoid® modified LR-5 were as follows: pooled sensitivity: 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.73, I2=89.20%; P<0.01] and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.87, I2=85.39%; P<0.01) (P<0.05); pooled specificity: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96, I2=86.52%; P<0.01) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91, I2=59.91%; P=0.01) (P<0.05); pooled area under the curve (AUC): 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.89) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93) (P<0.05), respectively. The meta-regression analysis revealed that the study design, subject enrollment method, and reference standard contributed to the heterogeneity of SonoVue® LR-5, and the number of lesions was a source of heterogeneity for Sonazoid® modified LR-5. The diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS category M (LR-M) algorithms of SonoVue® and Sonazoid® was comparable.

Conclusions

The Sonazoid® modified LR-5 algorithm had a higher diagnostic sensitivity, lower specificity, and higher AUC than SonoVue® LR-5.

Evaluation of the Time Difference Method in Identifying Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Current CEUS LR-M Category Nodules

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to explore a potential method for improving the diagnostic detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2017.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 585 liver nodules in 427 patients at risk for HCC from December 2020 to March 2023. The nodules were categorized as LR-1 to LR-M based on CEUS LI-RADS Version 2017 and were randomly subclassified into a developmental cohort (DC) and a validation cohort (VC) at 3:1. In the DC, the cutoff value of the time difference (∆T) for differentiating HCC from other malignancies by LR-M was calculated and used to reclassify nodules in the VC. The diagnostic effect on HCC detection before and after reclassification was further assessed.

RESULTS

According to the current CEUS LI-RADS, 140 of 426 (32.9%) confirmed HCC nodules were misclassified as LR-M. In the DC (439 nodules), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve revealed that the cutoff value of ∆T (wash-out onset time minus contrast arrival time) recommended for HCC diagnosis was greater than 21 s. In the VC (146 nodules), 34 HCCs were correctly categorized as LR-5 according to the cutoff value, and after reclassification, LR-5 had higher accuracy (67.1% vs. 89.0%, p < 0.001) and sensitivity (56.0% vs. 87.2%, p < 0.001) for HCC diagnosis with high specificity (100% vs. 94.6%, p = 0.500).

CONCLUSION

Using the time difference method could identify HCC nodules misdiagnosed as LR-M and improve the diagnostic performance of current CEUS LI-RADS.

Diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with CEUS

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare, heterogeneous, highly lethal tumor of the biliary tract. Due to the lack of effective treatments, an early identification of ICC is essential to achieve the best outcome in terms of therapy and prognosis aiming for a curative intent. ICC may arise on a normal liver or with an underlying liver disease, making the diagnosis more difficult and complex. Contrast-enhancement ultrasound (CEUS) is an accurate procedure able to detect ICC-specific contrast vascular pattern, and thus facilitating the correlation between radiological and histopathological findings with high specificity and sensitivity. CEUS has been shown to have a high diagnostic potential in the diagnosis of ICC thanks to the possibility of studying in real time the intralesional microcirculation and evaluating the precocity of the enhancement of the lesion during the arterial phase. All these features allow to differentiate the ICC from hepatocarcinoma (HCC) with high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, CEUS is a rapid, non-invasive, non-nephrotoxic or non-allergenic tool. The only limitations CEUS may have are related to the disease site and patient characteristics (obesity) and compliance, including the operator's experience. A clinical evaluation of the patient, together with tumor markers and biochemical tests assessment, to differentiate ICC from HCC are highly suggested.

The Clinical Value of Multimodal Ultrasound for the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Liver Tumors in Relation to Histopathology

Recent advances in the field of ultrasonography offer promising tools for the evaluation of liver tumors. We aim to assess the value of multimodal ultrasound in differentiating hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) from other liver lesions. We prospectively included 66 patients with 72 liver tumors. The histological analysis was the reference standard for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions, and partially for benign tumors. All liver lesions were assessed by multiparametric ultrasound: standard ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using shear wave measurement (SWM) method and real-time tissue elastography (RTE). To diagnose HCCs, CEUS achieved a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value (PPV) of 69.05%, 92.86%, 78.57% and 93.55%, respectively. The mean shear-wave velocity (Vs) value in HCCs was 1.59 ± 0.29 m/s, which was lower than non-HCC malignancies (p < 0.05). Using a cut-off value of 1.58 m/s, SWM achieved a sensitivity of 54.76%, and 82.35% specificity, for differentiating HCCs from other malignant lesions. The combination of SWM and CEUS showed higher sensitivity (79.55%) compared with each technique alone, while maintaining a high specificity (89.29%). In RTE, most HCCs (61.53%) had a mosaic pattern with dominant blue areas corresponding to type "c" elasticity. Elasticity type "c" was 70.59% predictive for HCCs. In conclusion, combining B-mode ultrasound, CEUS, pSWE and RTE can provide complementary diagnostic information and potentially decrease the requirements for other imaging modalities.

Contrast-Enhanced Imaging in the Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: State of Art and Future Perspectives

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) represents the second most common liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma, accounting for 15% of primary liver neoplasms. Its incidence and mortality rate have been rising during the last years, and total new cases are expected to increase up to 10-fold during the next two or three decades. Considering iCCA's poor prognosis and rapid spread, early diagnosis is still a crucial issue and can be very challenging due to the heterogeneity of tumor presentation at imaging exams and the need to assess a correct differential diagnosis with other liver lesions. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an irreplaceable role in the evaluation of liver masses. iCCA's most typical imaging patterns are well-described, but atypical features are not uncommon at both CT and MRI; on the other hand, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has shown a great diagnostic value, with the interesting advantage of lower costs and no renal toxicity, but there is still no agreement regarding the most accurate contrastographic patterns for iCCA detection. Besides diagnostic accuracy, all these imaging techniques play a pivotal role in the choice of the therapeutic approach and eligibility for surgery, and there is an increasing interest in the specific imaging features which can predict tumor behavior or histologic subtypes. Further prognostic information may also be provided by the extraction of quantitative data through radiomic analysis, creating prognostic multi-parametric models, including clinical and serological parameters. In this review, we aim to summarize the role of contrast-enhanced imaging in the diagnosis and management of iCCA, from the actual issues in the differential diagnosis of liver masses to the newest prognostic implications.

Ultrasound radiomics in the prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To systematically assess the clinical value of ultrasound radiomics in the prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Relevant articles were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Medline and screened according to the eligibility criteria. The quality of the included articles was assessed based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. After article assessment and data extraction, the diagnostic performance of ultrasound radiomics was evaluated based on pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by generating the ROC curve. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.1, and subgroup analysis was conducted to identify the sources of heterogeneity. A Fagan nomogram was generated to assess the clinical utility of ultrasound radiomics.

Results

Five studies involving 1260 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that ultrasound radiomics had a pooled sensitivity of 79% (95% CI: 75-83%), specificity of 70% (95% CI: 59-79%), PLR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.9-3.7), NLR of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.23-0.39), DOR of 9 (95% CI: 5-16), and AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were statistically reliable and stable, and no significant difference was identified during subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

Ultrasound radiomics has favorable predictive performance in the microvascular invasion of HCC and may serve as an auxiliary tool for guiding clinical decision-making.

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 24th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2022

This article summarises expert discussion on the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which took place during the 24th World Gastrointestinal Cancer Congress (WGICC) in Barcelona, July 2022. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to ensure an optimal diagnosis and staging of HCC, planning of curative and therapeutic options, including surgical, embolisation, ablative strategies, or systemic therapy. Furthermore, in many patients with HCC, underlying liver cirrhosis represents a challenge and influences the therapeutic options.

Update on the Applications of Radiomics in Diagnosis, Staging, and Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This paper offers an assessment of radiomics tools in the evaluation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for papers published in the English language no earlier than October 2022.

RESULTS

We found 236 studies, and 37 satisfied our research criteria. Several studies addressed multidisciplinary topics, especially diagnosis, prognosis, response to therapy, and prediction of staging (TNM) or pathomorphological patterns. In this review, we have covered diagnostic tools developed through machine learning, deep learning, and neural network for the recurrence and prediction of biological characteristics. The majority of the studies were retrospective.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to conclude that many performing models have been developed to make differential diagnosis easier for radiologists to predict recurrence and genomic patterns. However, all the studies were retrospective, lacking further external validation in prospective and multicentric cohorts. Furthermore, the radiomics models and the expression of results should be standardized and automatized to be applicable in clinical practice.