A new effect of luminance gradient on achromatic simultaneous contrast

The switching glare illusion: Appearance and disappearance of glare effect due to figure-ground reversal

The glare illusion is an illusory perception of brightness enhancement and self-luminosity from a glare pattern, which consists of a central white area and surrounding areas with radial darkening luminance gradients. Here, we report a phenomenon we call "the switching glare illusion." In this phenomenon, observers experience perceptual alternation in which the glare effect repeatedly appears and disappears or attenuates when the multiple glare patterns are arranged in a grid pattern. This perceptual alternation is caused by a figure-ground reversal in the grid pattern. Since such a phenomenon has not been reported for a single glare pattern, this is caused by arranging multiple glare patterns in a grid. This new finding is worthy for further studies for understanding the mechanisms underlying the glare effect and brightness perception.

Effects of a gap between the central and surrounding regions with luminance gradients on the feeling of being dazzled

The feeling of being dazzled is evoked by images consisting of an achromatic uniform center, surrounded by regions with luminance gradients. As the perceptual distinctness of the central region has been suggested to contribute to the feeling of being dazzled, we examined the effects of a gap between the central and surrounding regions on the feeling of being dazzled. The stimulus comprised a disk with uniform luminance surrounded by an annulus, of which the luminance was decreased from the inner boundary to the periphery. Three luminance profiles (linear, logistic, and inverse-logistic) of the surrounding luminance ramps were used. The distinctness of the disk decreased in the order of logistic, linear, and inverse-logistic profiles. The luminance of the disk, the maximum luminance of the annulus, and the gap size were also varied. When the luminance continuously transitioned from the disk to the annulus, the feeling of being dazzled was stronger for the inverse-logistic annulus luminance profile, compared with the logistic and linear profiles without a gap; however, it was not different for the three profiles with a gap. Further, the feeling of being dazzled increased when a gap was introduced for the logistic and linear profiles, but not for the inverse-logistic profile. These results suggest that the feeling of being dazzled was reduced by the perceptual indistinctness of the central disk for the logistic and linear annulus luminance profiles, while the gap restored the feeling of being dazzled by making the central disk perceptually distinct.

Simple Assumptions to Improve Markov Illuminance and Reflectance

Murray recently introduced a novel computational lightness model, Markov illuminance and reflectance (MIR). MIR is a promising new approach that simulates human lightness processing using a conditional random field (CRF) where natural-scene statistics of reflectance and illumination are implemented. Although MIR can account for various lightness illusions and phenomena, it has limitations, such as the inability to predict reverse-contrast phenomena. In this study, we improved MIR performance by modifying its inference process, the prior on X-junctions, and that on general illumination changes. Our modified model improved predictions for Checkerboard assimilation, the simplified Checkershadow and its control figure, the influence of luminance noise, and White's effect and its several variants. In particular, White's effect is a partial reverse contrast that is challenging for computational models, so this improvement is a significant advance for the MIR framework. This study showed the high extensibility and potential of MIR, which shows the promise for further sophistication.

Effect of glare illusion-induced perceptual brightness on temporal perception

Temporal perception and the ability to precisely ascertain time duration are central to essentially all behaviors. Since stimulus magnitude is assumed to be positively related to the perceived duration from the early days of experimental psychology, most studies so far have assessed this effect by presenting stimuli with relatively different intensities in physical quantity. However, it remains unclear how perceptual magnitude itself directly affects temporal perception. In this study (n = 21, n = 20), we conducted a two‐interval duration‐discrimination task adapting a glare illusion (a visual illusion that enhances perceived brightness without changing physical luminance) to investigate whether the temporal perception is also influenced by perceptual magnitude. Based on the mean difference in the point of subjective equality derived from a psychometric function and pupil diameter, we found that temporal perception is influenced by the illusory brightness of glare stimuli. Interestingly, the perceived duration of the apparently brighter stimuli (glare stimuli; larger pupillary light reflex) was shorter than that of control stimuli (halo stimuli; smaller pupillary light reflex) despite the stimuli remaining physically equiluminant, in contrast with the well‐known "magnitude effect." Furthermore, this temporal modulation did not occur when the physical luminance of the stimuli was manipulated to match the illusory‐induced magnitude. These results indicate that temporal processing depends on the confluence of both external and perceived subjective magnitude and even illusory brightness is sufficient to affect the sense of duration; which may be explained by the internal magnitude decrease of the glare stimuli due to pupillary constriction decreasing the light entering the eye.

Our findings suggest a new viewpoint on the positive relationship between temporal perception and stimulus magnitude, in demonstrating that temporal processing depends on the confluence of both external and perceived internal magnitude. We provide evidence that illusory brightness induced by the glare‐illusion also influences the perceived duration which may be explained by the size of the pupil.

Asymmetric Brightness Effects With Dark Versus Light Glare-Like Stimuli

The glare effect is a brightness illusion that has captured the attention of the vision community since its discovery. However, its photometrical reversal, which we refer to here as photometrical reversed glare (PRG) stimuli, remained relatively unexplored. We presented three experiments that sought to examine the perceived brightness of a target area surrounded by luminance gradients in PRG stimuli and compare them with conventional glare effect configurations. Experiment 1 measured the brightness of the central target area of PRG stimuli through an adjustment task; the results showed that the target appeared brighter than similar, comparative areas not surrounded by luminance gradients. This finding was unexpected given the recent report that PRG stimuli cause pupil dilation. Meanwhile, Experiments 2 and 3 implemented a rating task to further test the findings in Experiment 1. Again, the study found a robust brightening illusion in the target area of PRG stimuli in a wide range of target and background luminance. The results are discussed in comparison with the brightness enhancement of the glare effect.

Shining a Light on Race: Contrast and Assimilation Effects in the Perception of Skin Tone and Racial Typicality

Researchers have long debated the extent to which an individual’s skin tone influences their perceived race. Brooks and Gwinn (2010) demonstrated that the race of surrounding faces can affect the perceived skin tone of a central target face without changing perceived racial typicality, suggesting that skin lightness makes a small contribution to judgments of race compared to morphological cues (the configuration and shape of the facial features). However, the lack of a consistent light source may have undermined the reliability of skin tone cues, encouraging observers to rely disproportionately on morphological cues instead. The current study addresses this concern by using 3D models of male faces with typically Black African or White European appearances that are illuminated by the same light source. Observers perceived target faces surrounded by White faces to have darker skin than those surrounded by Black faces, particularly for faces of intermediate lightness. However, when asked to judge racial typicality, a small assimilation effect was evident, with target faces perceived as more stereotypically White when surrounded by White than when surrounded by Black faces at intermediate levels of typicality. This evidence of assimilation effects for perceived racial typicality despite concurrent contrast effects on perceived skin lightness supports the previous conclusion that perceived skin lightness has little influence on judgments of racial typicality for racially ambiguous faces, even when lighting is consistent.

Color consistency in the appearance of bleached fabrics

Human observers are remarkably good at perceiving constant object color across illumination changes. However, there are numerous other factors that can modulate surface appearance, such as aging, bleaching, staining, or soaking. Despite this, we are often able to identify material properties across such transformations. Little is known about how and to what extent we can compensate for the accompanying color transformations. Here we investigated whether humans could reproduce the original color of bleached fabrics. We treated 12 different fabric samples with a commercial bleaching product. Bleaching increased luminance and decreased saturation. We presented photographs of the original and bleached samples on a computer screen and asked observers to match the fabric colors to an adjustable matching disk. Different groups of observers produced matches for original and bleached samples. One group of observers were instructed to match the color of the bleached samples as they were before bleaching (i.e., compensate for the effects of bleaching); another, to accurately match color appearance. Observers did compensate significantly for the effects of bleaching when instructed to do so, but not in the appearance match condition. Results of a second experiment suggest that observers achieve color consistency, at least in part, through a strategy based on local spatial differences within the bleached samples. According to the results of a third experiment, these local spatial differences are likely to be the perceptual image cues that allow participants to determine whether a sample is bleached. When the effect of bleaching was limited or uniformly distributed across a sample's surface, observers were uncertain about the bleaching magnitude and seemed to apply cognitive strategies to achieve color consistency.

Colorful glares: Effects of colors on brightness illusions measured with pupillometry

We hypothesized that pupil constrictions to the glare illusion, where converging luminance gradients subjectively enhance the perception of brightness, would be stronger for 'blue' than for other colors. Such an expectation was based on reflections about the ecology of vision, where the experience of dazzling light is common when one happens to look directly at sunlight through some occluders. Thus, we hypothesized that pupil constrictions to 'blue' reflect an ecologically-based expectation of the visual system from the experience of sky's light and color, which also leads to interpret the blue gradients of illusory glare to act as effective cues to impending probable intense light. We therefore manipulated the gradients color of glare illusions and measured changes in subjective brightness of identical shape stimuli. We confirmed that the blue resulted in what was subjectively evaluated as the brightest condition, despite all colored stimuli were equiluminant. This enhanced brightness effect was observed both in a psychophysical adjustment task and in changes in pupil size, where the maximum pupil constriction peak was observed with the 'blue' converging gradients over and above to the pupil response to blue in other conditions (i.e., diverging gradients and homogeneous patches). Moreover, glare-related pupil constrictions for each participant were correlated to each individual's subjective brightness adjustments. Homogenous blue hues also constricted the pupil more than other hues, which represents a pupillometric analog of the Helmholtz-Kohlrausch effect on brightness perception. Together, these findings show that pupillometry constitutes an easy tool to assess individual differences in color brightness perception.

An Upward-Facing Surface Appears Darker: The Role Played by the Light-From-Above Assumption in Lightness Perception

The human visual system can extract information on surface reflectance (lightness) from light intensity; this, however, confounds information on reflectance and illumination. We hypothesized that the visual system, to solve this lightness problem, utilizes the internally held prior assumption that illumination falls from above. Experiment 1 showed that an upward-facing surface is perceived to be darker than a downward-facing surface, proving our hypothesis. Experiment 2 showed the same results in the absence of explicit illumination cues. The effect of the light-from-left prior assumption was not observed in Experiment 3. The upward- and downward-facing surface stimuli in Experiments 1 and 2 showed no difference in a two-dimensional configuration or three-dimensional structure, and the participants' perceived lightness appeared to be affected by the observers' prior assumption that illumination is always from above. Other studies have not accounted for this illusory effect, and this study's finding provides additional insights into the study of lightness perception.

Effects of Peripheral Gradient of Color Saturation on the Feeling of Being Dazzled

The feeling of being dazzled that is evoked by images consisting of an achromatic uniform center surrounded by regions with a luminance gradient was investigated. The effects of type of color saturation gradient in the peripheral region on the feeling of being dazzled were examined. Stimulus configuration was also varied. For the stimulus configuration of a disk-annulus, the feeling of being dazzled was lower for an increasing saturation gradient from the center to the periphery than for decreasing and no-saturation gradients when the center and the periphery maximum luminances were the same. This suggests that the presence of a chromaticity difference between the disk and the surrounding annulus strengthens the feeling of being dazzled. Similar results were obtained for the stimulus configuration of a star shape. For the stimulus configuration of a cross shape, quite different results were obtained; the chromaticity discontinuity had little or opposite effect. These results suggest that chromaticity border and stimulus configurations are factors in the feeling of being dazzled that is evoked by images with luminance gradient.

Luminance gradients and non-gradients as a cue for distinguishing reflectance and illumination in achromatic images: A computational approach

The brain analyses the visual world through the luminance patterns that reach the retina. Formally, luminance (as measured by the retina) is the product of illumination and reflectance. Whereas illumination is highly variable, reflectance is a physical property that characterizes each object surface. Due to memory constraints, it seems plausible that the visual system suppresses illumination patterns before object recognition takes place. Since many combinations of reflectance and illumination can give rise to identical luminance values, finding the correct reflectance value of a surface is an ill-posed problem, and it is still an open question how it is solved by the brain. Here we propose a computational approach that first learns filter kernels ("receptive fields") for slow and fast variations in luminance, respectively, from achromatic real-world images. Distinguishing between luminance gradients (slow variations) and non-gradients (fast variations) could serve to constrain the mentioned ill-posed problem. The second stage of our approach successfully segregates luminance gradients and non-gradients from real-world images. Our approach furthermore predicts that visual illusions that contain luminance gradients (such as Adelson's checker-shadow display or grating induction) may occur as a consequence of this segregation process.

The Influence of Physical Illumination on Lightness Perception in Simultaneous Contrast Displays

Three experiments investigated the role of physical illumination on lightness perception in simultaneous lightness contrast (SLC). Four configurations were employed: the classic textbook version of the illusion and three configurations that produced either enhanced or reduced SLC. Experiment 1 tested the effect of ambient illumination on lightness perception. It simulated very dark environmental conditions that nevertheless still allowed perception of different shades of gray. Experiment 2 tested the effect of the intensity of Gelb lighting on lightness perception. Experiment 3 presented two conditions that integrated illumination conditions from Experiments 1 and 2. Our results demonstrated an illumination effect on both lightness matching and perceived SLC contrast: As the intensity of illumination increased, the target on the black background appeared lighter, while the target on the white background was little affected. We hypothesize the existence of two illumination ranges that affect lightness perception differently: low and normal. In the low range, the SLC contrast was reduced and targets appeared darker. In the normal range, the SLC contrast and lightness matchings for each background were little changed across illumination intensities.

Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy

The intersection between an illumination and a reflectance edge is characterised by the ‘ratio-invariant’ property, that is the luminance ratio of the regions under different illumination remains the same.

In a CRT experiment, we shaped two areas, one surrounding the other, and simulated an illumination edge dividing them in two frames of illumination. The portion of the illumination edge standing on the surrounding area (labelled contextual background) was the contextual edge, while the portion standing on the enclosed area (labelled mediating background) was the mediating edge. On the mediating background, there were two patches, one per illumination frame. Observers were asked to adjust the luminance of the patch in bright illumination to equate the lightness of the other. We compared conditions in which the luminance ratio at the contextual edge could be (i) equal (possible shadow), or (ii) larger (impossible shadow) than that at the mediating edge. In addition, we manipulated the reflectance of the backgrounds. It could be higher for the contextual than for the mediating background; or, vice versa, lower for the contextual than for the mediating background. Results reveal that lightness constancy significantly increases when: (i) the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge creating an impossible shadow, and (ii) the reflectance of the contextual background is lower than that of the mediating one. We interpret our results according to the albedo hypothesis, and suggest that the scission process is facilitated when the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge and/or the reflectance of the including area is lower than that of the included one. This occurs even if the ratio-invariant property is violated.

Effects of Colors on the Feeling of Being Dazzled Evoked by Stimuli with Luminance Gradients

The sensation of being dazzled by light was investigated, and the effects of colors on the feeling were assessed using stimuli composed of a disk and a surrounding annulus with luminance gradient, which had a glowing appearance. The colors of the disk and annulus were varied, while the luminance of each pixel was unchanged. In addition, disk and maximum annulus luminances were also varied. Ten participants were asked to rate the feeling of being dazzled for the stimuli. Results of a four-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the main effect of disk color was not significant, whereas the annulus color was. Furthermore, there was significant interaction of the disk color and the annulus color. On the whole, the feeling of being dazzled for the light-blue or pink annulus was stronger than that for the other colors, while the light-blue (pink) annulus did not significantly differ in that feeling from the yellow, green, or gray annulus when the disk color was light-blue (pink). This indicates that the same disk color as the annulus color tended to reduce the feeling of being dazzled.

The influence of flankers on race categorization of faces

Context affects multiple cognitive and perceptual processes. In the present study, we asked how the context of a set of faces would affect the perception of a target face's race in two distinct tasks. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants categorized target faces according to perceived racial category (Black or White). In Experiment 1, the target face was presented alone or with Black or White flanker faces. The orientation of flanker faces was also manipulated to investigate how face inversion effect would interact with the influences of flanker faces on the target face. The results showed that participants were more likely to categorize the target face as White when it was surrounded by inverted White faces (an assimilation effect). Experiment 2 further examined how different aspects of the visual context would affect the perception of the target face by manipulating flanker faces' shape and pigmentation, as well as their orientation. The results showed that flanker faces' shape and pigmentation affected the perception of the target face differently. While shape elicited a contrast effect, pigmentation appeared to be assimilative. These novel findings suggest that the perceived race of a face is modulated by the appearance of other faces and their distinct shape and pigmentation properties. However, the contrast and assimilation effects elicited by flanker faces' shape and pigmentation may be specific to race categorization, since the same stimuli used in a delayed matching task (Experiment 3) revealed that flanker pigmentation induced a contrast effect on the perception of target pigmentation.

Brightness Alteration with Interweaving Contours

Chromatic induction is observed whenever the perceived colour of a target surface shifts towards the hue of a neighbouring surface. Some vivid manifestations may be seen in a white background where thin coloured lines have been drawn (assimilation) or when lines of different colours are collinear (neon effect) or adjacent (watercolour) to each other. This study examines a particular colour induction that manifests in concomitance with an opposite effect of colour saturation (or anti-spread). The two phenomena can be observed when a repetitive pattern is drawn in which outline thin contours intercept wider contours or surfaces, colour spreading appear to fill the surface occupied by surfaces or thick lines whereas the background traversed by thin lines is seen as brighter or filled of a saturated white. These phenomena were first observed by Bozzi (1975) and Kanizsa (1979) in figural conditions that did not allow them to document their conjunction. Here we illustrate various manifestations of this twofold phenomenon and compare its effects with the known effects of brightness and colour induction. Some conjectures on the nature of these effects are discussed.

Luminance profiles of luminance gradients affect the feeling of dazzling

The feeling of dazzling that is evoked by luminance gradients was examined. The stimulus consisted of a disk with uniform luminance surrounded by an annulus whose luminance was decreased from the inner boundary to the periphery. Three luminance profiles (linear, logistic, and inverse logistic) of a surrounding luminance ramp were used. The luminance of the disk and the maximum luminance of the annulus were also varied. The feeling of dazzling became stronger as the luminance of the disk and the maximum luminance of the annulus increased. The effect of the maximum luminance of the annulus was greater for the disk with low luminance than for that with high luminance. The feeling of dazzling tended to be greater for the logistic profile than for the other profiles. However, when the luminance of the disk and that at the inner boundary of the annulus were the same, the feeling of dazzling for the logistic profile was no stronger than that for the linear or the inverse-logistic profile. These results suggest that smooth transition from the disk to the annulus for the logistic profile suppresses the feeling of dazzling.

Measuring the Breathing Light Illusion by means of induced simultaneous contrast

By blurring the margins of a surface, both its brightness and the perceived contrast against a superimposed figure with sharp boundaries increase. Also, if one approaches a blurred white spot on a grey background, this spot will appear wider and brighter: this phenomenon is known as the Breathing Light Illusion (BLI) (Gori and Stubbs, 2006 Perception 35 1573-1577). We studied the increment of the achromatic contrast of a grey sharp-boundary disk when it was superimposed on the BLI. This augmentation of the perceived contrast in the dynamic presentation of the BLI was significantly stronger than the effect that Agostini and Galmonte (2002a Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 264-269) obtained in static presentation. Our study leads to an indirect quantification of the BLI. Two control experiments showed that the increment of the achromatic contrast depends on the blurred spot and is independent of the dynamic increment in angular size. These results argue for a causal relationship between the increase in brightness due to the BLI and the darkening of the superimposed disk.

Brightness enhancement seen through a tube

We report a fascinating phenomenon that emerges when a surface is viewed through a tube held close to one eye, with the other eye open. The disk-shaped area seen through the tube looks strikingly brighter and, when viewed on a textured background, also of higher spatial contrast than the same surface area viewed without a tube. The effect is reminiscent of a spotlight illuminating the area under consideration. We call this the 'tube effect'. The tube effect is one of the strongest contrast illusions known to us. It requires a matching luminance that is twice as high as the reference luminance seen through the tube. Brightness ratings increase linearly with the log of the background luminance. The effect (i) produces a dark afterimage, (ii) reverses in polarity with low ambient illumination, (iii) assumes the complementary colour of the illuminant, and (iv) persists with fully dilated pupils. Potential explanations include simultaneous contrast (due to the penumbra and dark inner walls of the tube) and veiling of the surround (due to local adaptation and a lower gain factor).

Measuring the meter: on the constancy of lightness scales seen against different backgrounds

The constancy of a 16-step achromatic Munsell scale was tested with regards to background variations in two experiments. In experiment 1 three groups of observers were asked to find lightness matches for targets in simultaneous lightness displays by using a 16-step achromatic Munsell scale placed on a white, black, or white-black checkered background. In experiment 2, a yellow-blue checkered background and a green-red checkered background replaced Munsell scales on the black and on the white backgrounds. Significant effects of scale background on matches were found only in experiment 1, suggesting that background luminance is a crucial factor in the overall appearance of the scale. The lack of significant differences in experiment 2, however, may stand for an overall robustness of the scale with respect to background luminance changes occurring within certain luminance ranges.

No role for lightness in the perception of black and white? Simultaneous contrast affects perceived skin tone, but not perceived race

Faces of individuals with African and European heritage (henceforth referred to as Black and White respectively) feature two major differences: those of skin tone and morphological characteristics. Although considerations of perceived race are important to various psychological subdisciplines, to date the relative influence of morphological versus photometric characteristics has not been investigated. We attempted to influence the perceived racial typicality of a central target face by manipulating perceived skin tone using the well-known lightness contrast illusion. As expected, ratings of skin tone were influenced by surround faces, yet ratings of perceived racial typicality were not, suggesting a dissociation between the two judgments. Surprisingly, skin tone contributes little to perceived race, leaving facial morphology as the dominant cue. These results may shed light on failures to find effects of racial typicality in studies of prejudice where judgments were based on photographs with altered skin tone alone.

Lightness, brightness and transparency: a quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy

The past quarter century has witnessed considerable advances in our understanding of Lightness (perceived reflectance), Brightness (perceived luminance) and perceived Transparency (LBT). This review poses eight major conceptual questions that have engaged researchers during this period, and considers to what extent they have been answered. The questions concern 1. the relationship between lightness, brightness and perceived non-uniform illumination, 2. the brain site for lightness and brightness perception, 3 the effects of context on lightness and brightness, 4. the relationship between brightness and contrast for simple patch-background stimuli, 5. brightness "filling-in", 6. lightness anchoring, 7. the conditions for perceptual transparency, and 8. the perceptual representation of transparency. The discussion of progress on major conceptual questions inevitably requires an evaluation of which approaches to LBT are likely and which are unlikely to bear fruit in the long term, and which issues remain unresolved. It is concluded that the most promising developments in LBT are (a) models of brightness coding based on multi-scale filtering combined with contrast normalization, (b) the idea that the visual system decomposes the image into "layers" of reflectance, illumination and transparency, (c) that an understanding of image statistics is important to an understanding of lightness errors, (d) Whittle's logW metric for contrast-brightness, (e) the idea that "filling-in" is mediated by low spatial frequencies rather than neural spreading, and (f) that there exist multiple cues for identifying non-uniform illumination and transparency. Unresolved issues include how relative lightness values are anchored to produce absolute lightness values, and the perceptual representation of transparency. Bridging the gap between multi-scale filtering and layer decomposition approaches to LBT is a major task for future research.

The Perceptual Contrast of Impossible Shadow Edges

Luminance ratios along shadow edges remain the same even when they cross reflectance borders. According to Gilchrist (1988, Perception & Psychophysics43 415–424) this so-called ratio-invariance property is a crucial factor in the perception of shadows. However, Soranzo and Agostini (2004, Perception33 1359–1368) suggested that in some conditions (named ‘impossible shadows’), a luminance pattern might still be perceived as a shadow even if the ratio-invariance property along its edge is violated. This can occur when an edge is collinear with another edge (contextual edge) which incorporates it, shares the same polarity, and generates a larger ratio. The hypothesis that impossible shadows are actually perceived as shadows is here tested by comparing the perceptual contrast of a luminance edge in the absence of a contextual edge (control condition) to that of both possible shadow edges (where the contextual and mediating edge share the same ratio) and impossible shadow edges (where the ratio of the contextual edge is larger rather than that at the mediating edge). We found that the perceived contrast of luminance edges shrinks in both possible and impossible shadow conditions rather than in the control condition. This evidence supports the hypothesis that a luminance pattern might be perceived as a shadow even when the ratio-invariance property is violated.

When figure-ground segmentation modulates brightness: the case of phantom illumination

In the phantom illumination illusion, luminance ramps ranging from black to white induce a brightness enhancement on an otherwise homogeneous dark background. The strength of the illusion was tested with regard to the extension of the brightness inducing perimeter, surrounding the target area by manipulating the number of inducers (exp. 1) and the size of the inducers (exp. 2). Participants' task was to rate the difference in brightness between the target area and the background. Results show that the illusion occurs only when the target area is not completely segregated from the background by luminance ramps; vice versa, when the target area is delimited by a continuous gradient, it appears darker than the background. These findings suggest a major role of figure-ground organization in the appearance of the illusion. This hypothesis was tested in a rating task experiment with three types of target area shapes circumscribed by four types of edges: luminance contours, illusory contours, no contours, and ambiguous contours. Illusory contours, just as luminance contours, hinder the illusion and produce a darkening of the target area. A control experiment measured the brightness of the previous stimuli without luminance ramps: all configurations resulted in a darkening of the target area. Results from all experiments suggest that figure-ground segmentation plays a major role in the determination of both illumination and lightness in stimuli with luminance gradients.

Luminosity—A perceptual “feature” of light-emitting objects?

Light-emitting objects are perceived as qualitatively different from light-reflecting objects, and the two categories elicit different cortical activity. However, it is unclear whether object luminosity is treated as an independent visual feature, comparable to orientation, motion or colour. Visual search tasks revealed that light-emitting targets led to efficient search when presented with light-reflecting distractors of similar luminance, but this efficiency was induced by the presence of luminance gradients producing the percept of luminosity rather than by luminosity itself. This implies that luminance gradients (not object luminosity) are encoded as features, questioning the existence of specific sensory mechanisms to detect light-emitting objects.

Glowing greys and surface-white: the photo-geometric factors of luminosity perception

The perception of luminosity is thought to depend upon the intensity of the stimulus: a surface begins to appear self-luminous when it emits or reflects a certain amount of light. This is known as the luminosity threshold. It is a common opinion among vision scientists that such a threshold is correlated to the intensity of a perceptually white surface, in the sense that only an area of the visual field with luminance higher than perceived surface-white will appear luminous. Here we show grey colours that appear luminous in virtue of surrounding luminance ramps. These ramps are intended to mimic halos seen around light sources in natural environments. The results of three experiments indicate that the phenomenon is in direct contradiction to the aforementioned assumptions and suggest the existence of separate perceptual pathways for self-luminosity perception and for surface-colour perception.

Cortical distinction between the neural encoding of objects that appear to glow and those that do not

Objects that appear to glow appear very different from those that do not. However, the neural representation of glow has not been investigated. We present data from an fMRI study which suggest that an extra-striate visual area is involved in the encoding of glowing stimuli, and that this activation does not arise from luminance or contrast factors. Possible functional reasons for the existence of such an area are discussed.

The phantom illumination illusion

A novel brightness illusion in planar patterns is reported. The illusion occurs, for example, when surfaces with a luminance ramp shaded from black to white are positioned on a black homogeneous background, so that each white end of the surfaces faces a single point of the plane of the pattern. The illusion consists of the enhancement of the brightness of the background in a relatively wide area around the white ends of the surfaces. A parametric study was conducted in which participants were asked to rate the difference in brightness between the parts of the background inside and outside a virtual circle formed by disks with different luminance ramps. The results show that mean ratings of brightness depended on the luminance of the background, the luminance range of ramps, and the kind of ramp. Discussion of these results with reference to other brightness illusions (assimilation, neon color spreading, anomalous surfaces, visual phantoms, grating induction, and the glare effect) shows that t hephantom illumination illusion derives from processes producing the perception of ambient illumination.

Luminance gradient can break background-independent lightness constancy

A display with a luminance gradient was shown to induce a strong lightness illusion (Logvinenko, 1999 Perception 28 803-816). However, a 3-D cardboard model of this display was found to produce a much weaker illusion (less than half that in the pictorial version) despite the fact that its retinal image is practically the same. This is in line with the hypothesis that simultaneous lightness contrast is solely a phenomenon of pictorial perception (Logvinenko et al, 2002 Perception 31 73-82). The residual lightness illusion in the 3-D model can be accounted for by the fact that this model is a hybrid display. Specifically, while it is a real object, a pictorial representation (of the illumination gradient) is superimposed on it. Thus, lightness in the 3-D display is a compromise between two opposite tendencies: the background-independent lightness constancy and the lightness illusory shift induced by the luminance gradient.