Gradual increase in self-stimulation response rates: Effect of electrode loci

Determinants of the slow acquisition of medical and sulcal prefrontal cortex self-stimulation: an individual differences approach

Stimulation-naive rats were tested for motor activity during noncontingent electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPC) or sulcal prefrontal cortex (SPC). Defecation during stimulation was also measured. The rats were then tested using a conditioned taste aversion paradigm for aversion to a novel flavor (0.1% saccharin) paired with stimulation. Finally, the rats were trained to acquire self-stimulation over 26 days of training. Large individual differences were seen in motor activity, defecation, and conditioned taste aversion to initial stimulation and in the subsequent speed of self-stimulation acquisition. In the MPC-stimulated group, acquisition speed was positively correlated with motor activity to initial stimulation and negatively correlated with defecation to this stimulation. In the SPC-stimulated group, the same correlations were evident, but only when rats suffering seizures prior to self-stimulation acquisition were excluded from the analysis. Such preacquisition seizures, which were only found in the SPC-stimulated group, retarded self-stimulation acquisition. In most rats, MPC or SPC stimulation failed to condition a taste aversion to saccharin. These results suggest that the slow acquisition of MPC and SPC self-stimulation may be partly related to the motor suppressive, aversive, and convulsive properties of initial stimulation.

Behaviourally derived estimates of excitability in striatal and medial prefrontal cortical self-stimulation sites

The refractory periods of the substrate underlying brain-stimulation reward were investigated in three rats with moveable electrodes implanted in the rostral caudate-putamen and the medial prefrontal cortex. Acquisition of caudate-putamen self-stimulation occurred within the first session, while self-stimulation for medial prefrontal cortex was observed only after three sessions of caudate-putamen stimulation. The currents required for self-stimulation ranged from 300 to 800 microA (0.1 ms pulse duration) across animals; the maximum response rates averaged roughly 40 bar presses per minute for both structures. Refractory period estimates were obtained from ten caudate-putamen and four medial prefrontal cortex sites. The time course of recovery had the following profile: the curves began to rise at 0.65 ms and 0.95 ms for caudate-putamen and medial prefrontal cortex stimulation, respectively, thereafter increasing to approach an asymptote at 6.00 ms for the caudate-putamen and 6.25 ms for the medial prefrontal cortex. The mean effectiveness value corresponding to the asymptotic portion of the curves was 73% for the caudate-putamen and 69% for the medial prefrontal cortex. Like other forebrain structures, the behaviourally derived refractory periods underlying caudate-putamen and medial prefrontal cortex stimulation, at least at these particular sites, are significantly longer than those observed in most medial forebrain bundle areas, both beginning and ending later. One interpretation for the similarity in their refractory period profiles and the apparent facilitating effect of caudate-putamen stimulation on acquisition of medial prefrontal cortex self-stimulation is that these two regions form part of the same reward substrate.

Haloperidol attenuates conditioned place preferences produced by electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex

A Conditioned Place Preference test procedure [Ettenberg and Duvauchelle (13)] was used to investigate the effects of dopamine antagonist challenge on the rewarding properties of medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) electrical stimulation. Rats exhibited strong preferences for the side of a two-compartment test apparatus in which they experienced sessions of experimenter-administered 0.5-s trains of MPFC sine-wave 60-Hz stimulation. Pretreatment with the neuroleptic dopamine antagonist drug, haloperidol (0.0, 0.15, or 0.3 mg/kg IP), resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in the magnitude of observed place preferences. Preference tests were conducted 24 hours after drug-conditioning trials and, hence, were not subject to motoric or other nonspecific actions of the neuroleptic treatments. In a control experiment, haloperidol did not block the place aversions produced by dorsomedial tegmental stimulation. Animals can, therefore, recall place-associations formed in the presence of haloperidol, a result which challenges "state-dependent learning" explanations of the drug's actions. Together, these results are consistent with the view that dopamine neurotransmission is involved in the rewarding consequences of electrical stimulation in the medial prefrontal cortex.

Multiple reward systems and the prefrontal cortex

Electrical stimulation of the major divisions of the prefrontal cortex, the mediodorsal and sulcal areas, can serve as a reinforcing stimulus. Studies of self-stimulation of the prefrontal cortex have produced behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological evidence that the substrate of these rewarding effects can be dissociated from that subserving self-stimulation of ventral diencephalic sites such as the lateral hypothalamus. Other studies indicate that within the prefrontal cortex itself, self-stimulation of the medial and sulcal divisions can be attributed to dissociable processes. These observations suggest the existence of multiple, largely autonomous prefrontal subsystems involved in reinforcement. This raises the question of the functional significance of such systems, and of their organization. An approach to this problem is to consider the relationship between the behavioral functions of the prefrontal divisions and the characteristics of stimulation-induced reward obtained at each site. Studies of the effects of restricted prefrontal lesions indicate that the medial and sulcal divisions can be dissociated according to their involvement in the control of distinct types of sensory and motor events. Further experiments indicate that damage to each division causes selective deficits in the learning of stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relations, depending in part on the nature of the reinforcing event. Conditioning experiments further show that the rewarding effects produced by stimulation of these areas are preferentially associated to sensory events which correspond to the functional specialization of each division. These data are interpreted to suggest that different rewarding events and/or different attributes of rewarding stimuli are processed by distinct systems which are reflected by the organization of dissociable self-stimulation pathways.

Naloxone suppression of self-stimulation is independent of response difficulty

The action of the opiate antagonist naloxone on relatively easy (nose-poke) and relatively difficult (lever-press) self-stimulation behaviors was compared, in order to determine if opiate antagonists suppress self-stimulation by interfering with the ability of the animal to respond, or by reducing the reinforcement value of the stimulation. Naloxone (0.2, 2.0 and 20 mg/kg) significantly suppressed both nose-poking and lever-pressing self-stimulation rates, and the degree of suppression was virtually identical for both tasks at all doses examined. If naloxone had interfered with the ability of the animal to respond, then lever-pressing--which requires more motor output than nose-poking--should have been more suppressed than nose-poking. The results suggest that opiate antagonists do not interfere with the ability of the animal to respond, and are therefore consistent with the hypothesis that these drugs reduce the reinforcement value of the stimulation.

Hedonic interactions of medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis

It has been shown that 'pure reward' and 'reward-escape' sites in the lateral hypothalamus (LH) of rats respectively ameliorate and exacerbate nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NGC) stimulation-induced aversion52. Conversely, the present studies found that 'rewarding' medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) stimulation increased escape from NGC stimulation regardless of whether the MPFC site tested was 'pure reward' or 'reward-escape' in type. This suggested that a simple algebraic summation model of positive and negative affective processes may not adequately describe the NGC-MPFC interaction. In a subsequent study, rats were observed both to barpress less to obtain, and more to escape from, 'rewarding' MPFC stimulation during continuous NGC stimulation, supporting the hypothesis that the observed MPFC stimulation-mediated increase in NGC stimulation escape reflected an exacerbation of aversion. Finally, NGC stimulation was seen to increase barpressing to obtain 'subreward' MPFC current trains, indicating a potentiation of the reward value of such current. Results of this series of studies suggests a hedonic interaction model of NGC and MPFC characterized by reciprocal neuromodulation. The model is conceptualized as a 'neural opponent process' subserving affective 'balance' and 'feature enhancement', and its possible relevance to the putative role of the MPFC in cocaine use is discussed.

The role of corticocortical projections in self-stimulation of the prelimbic and sulcal prefrontal cortex in rats

Four experiments were performed to assess the nature of the contribution of the corticocortical projections between the prelimbic and sulcal divisions of the rat prefrontal cortex to self-stimulation (SS) of these sites. The first experiment showed that transection of these projections by parasagittal knife cuts or bilateral electrolytic lesions of the prelimbic cortex had no effect on SS of the sulcal cortex. The second experiment demonstrated that SS of the prelimbic cortex could be obtained after transection of the corticocortical projection path. The third experiment demonstrated that the deficit in prelimbic SS, seen to follow such bilateral transections, is a function of the amount of exposure to the stimulation given to the animals after the lesion. The fourth experiment showed that the stimulation-dependent process underlying the acquisition of prelimbic and sulcal SS could be dissociated by the knife cuts. The discussion focused on the implications of these findings for an account of prefrontal self-stimulation behavior.

Cortical and ventral tegmental systems exert opposing influences on self-stimulation from the prefrontal cortex

Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) was obtained from 3 areas of anteromedial cortex: the prelimbic area (Brodman's area 32), the anterior cingulate area and the posterior cingulate area. Electrical stimulation in the prelimbic and anterior cingulate areas also produces a behavioral inhibition which is most pronounced at anterior sites (i.e. prelimbic) and declines at increasingly more posterior sites. It was found that the acquisition of responding for ICSS and the magnitude of amphetamine's facilitation of ICSS were inversely related to the degree of behavioral inhibition. These data and the ability of amphetamine to reverse prefrontal stimulation-induced inhibition suggest an important interaction between the prefrontal cortex and the mesolimbic dopamine systems in the control of goal-directed behavior. A model involving cortical suppression of mesolimbic dopamine function is discussed.

An investigation of the factors affecting development of frontal cortex self-stimulation

Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) of the medial prefrontal cortex (MFC) is acquired gradually, taking 4 or more days to establish. One explanation for this finding is that the stimulation becomes more rewarding with repetition. Four experiments were conducted to test this hypotheses. In Experiment 1, the MFC ICSS frequency thresholds remained constant over the first 3 weeks of testing while the rate of lever pressing response increased. In Experiment 2, it was found that acquisition of MFC ICSS was much more rapid when a motorically simpler response (nose-poking) was employed. Similarly, Experiments 3 and 4 further demonstrated that response factors such as task complexity may ultimately determine the rate of development of frontal cortex ICSS. Overall, these data suggest that independent of the rewarding effects of MFC stimulation there are other effects that initially interfere with learning of complex operant responses.

Development of brain stimulation reward in the medial prefrontal cortex: facilitation by prior electrical stimulation of the sulcal prefrontal cortex

Electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MC) in rats delivered daily for seven days causes a marked improvement in the rate of acquisition of a self-stimulation response. In the present experiment, we looked at whether we could get the same facilitatory effect on self-stimulation of the MC by delivering pre-training stimulation to other points in the brain anatomically related to the MC. Electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus was without effect. However, electrical stimulation of the sulcal prefrontal cortex (SC) either contralateral or ipsilateral to the MC electrode did facilitate acquisition of self-stimulation of the MC. Thus the Sc and MC would appear to be part of the same substrate controlling the development of positive reinforcement in the MC.

Plasticity of the medial prefrontal cortex: facilitated acquisition of intracranial self-stimulation by pretraining stimulation

Prior electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex MFC facilitated the subsequent acquisition of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) from the same MFC electrode site. Stimulations that were spaced over a period of six days were more effective in producing this facilitation than the same number of stimulations delivered over a two day period. These data suggest that the rewarding effects of MFC stimulation may involve some process akin to the kindling phenomenon and as such may provide insights in the neuronal modifications thought to underlie learning and memory.