Effects of serotonergic drugs in rats trained to discriminate clozapine from haloperidol

Discriminative stimulus properties of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol compared to other antipsychotic drugs in C57BL/6 mice

Haloperidol (HAL) was developed in 1958 for the treatment of schizophrenia and is classified as a typical antipsychotic drug (APD). Effective in treating positive symptoms of schizophrenia, it does not treat negative symptoms and produces extrapyramidal motor side-effects. Atypical APDs like clozapine treat both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, have reduced extrapyramidal motor side-effects and possess other clinical advantages. This study used a drug discrimination assay to allow a direct comparison between the subjective effects of HAL and other APDs. Eleven C57BL/6 mice were trained to discriminate 0.05 mg/kg HAL from the vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination task. The HAL generalization curve (0.001563-0.2 mg/kg) yielded an ED50=0.0024 mg/kg (95% confidence interval: 0.0012-0.0048 mg/kg). The typical APD chlorpromazine produced full substitution at 4.0 mg/kg with 82.7% drug-lever responding (%DLR) with significant rate suppression and partial substitution (73.9% DLR) at 1.0 mg/kg with no rate suppression. The atypical APD clozapine produced partial substitution at 2.5 mg/kg (64.8% DLR) with significant rate suppression. The atypical APD amisulpride failed to substitute for HAL with a maximum %DLR of 57.9% at 40 mg/kg with no rate suppression. The atypical APD aripiprazole partially substituted with a maximum of 75.9% DLR at 1.25 mg/kg with significant rate suppression. These results demonstrate that HAL can be trained as a discriminative stimulus in C57BL/6 mice, and its discriminative cue appears to be unique and distinct from that of atypical APDs.

Translational Value of Drug Discrimination with Typical and Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs

This chapter focuses on the translational value of drug discrimination as a preclinical assay for drug development. In particular, the importance of two factors, i.e., training dose and species, for drug discrimination studies with the atypical antipsychotic clozapine is examined. Serotonin receptors appear to be an important pharmacological mechanism mediating clozapine's discriminative cue in both rats and mice, although differences are clearly evident as antagonism of cholinergic muscarinic receptors is important in rats at a higher training dose (5.0 mg/kg) of clozapine, but not at a lower training dose (1.25 mg/kg). Antagonism of α1 adrenoceptors is a sufficient mechanism in C57BL/6 and 129S2 mice to mimic clozapine's cue, but not in DBA/2 and B6129S mice, and only produces partial substitution in low-dose clozapine discrimination in rats. Dopamine antagonism produces partial substitution for clozapine in DBA/2, 129S2, and B6129S mice, but not in C57BL/6 mice, and partial substitution is seen with D4 antagonism in low-dose clozapine drug discrimination in rats. Thus, it is evident that clozapine has a complex mixture of receptor contributions towards its discriminative cue based on the data from the four mouse strains that have been tested that is similar to the results from rat studies. A further examination of antipsychotic stimulus properties in humans, particularly in patients with schizophrenia, would go far in evaluating the translational value of the drug discrimination paradigm for antipsychotic drugs.

The discriminative stimulus effects of the neurotensin NTS1 receptor agonist PD149163 in rats: stimulus generalization testing with dopamine D1 and D2 receptor ligands

Brain-penetrant neurotensin NTS1 receptor agonists produce antipsychotic drug-like effects in animal models, including inhibition of conditioned avoidance responding and reversal of psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity and stereotypy. Allosteric interactions between NTS1 receptors and dopamine D2 receptors may account for some of these antipsychotic effects. In order to determine the role that dopamine receptors may play in the behavioral effects produced by activation of NTS1 receptors, a drug discrimination approach was used in rats to evaluate the potential mediation of NTS1 receptor agonist stimulus effects by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. Rats were trained to discriminate either the NTS1 receptor agonist PD149163, the D1 receptor agonist SKF81297, or the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole from vehicle in a two choice drug discrimination task. Full stimulus generalization occurred from PD149163 to the typical antipsychotic drug and D2 receptor-preferring antagonist haloperidol. However, stimulus generalization did not occur from SKF81297 or quinpirole to PD149163. The discriminative cue for SKF91297 and quinpirole was fully blocked the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 and the D2/3 receptor antagonist raclopride, respectively. Cross generalization did not occur between SKF91297 and quinpirole. Based on these findings, the stimulus effects of PD149163 may be mediated, in part, through D2 receptor antagonism, but this may only be evident when PD149163 is used as the training drug.

Further characterization of the discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine in C57BL/6 mice: role of 5-HT(2A) serotonergic and alpha (1) adrenergic antagonism

RATIONALE

The discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic drug (APD) clozapine (CLZ) have recently been studied in C57BL/6 mice, a common background strain for genetic alterations. However, further evaluation is needed to fully characterize CLZ's discriminative cue in this strain of mice.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to confirm the previous findings using a shorter pretreatment time and to further characterize the receptor mechanisms mediating the discriminative stimulus properties of CLZ by testing APDs, selective ligands, and N-desmethylclozapine (CLZ's major metabolite) in C57BL/6 mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C57BL/6 male mice were trained to discriminate 2.5 mg/kg CLZ (s.c.) from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination task.

RESULTS

Generalization testing with CLZ yielded an ED(50) = 1.19 mg/kg. Substitution testing with APDs showed that the atypical APDs quetiapine, sertindole, zotepine, iloperidone, and melperone fully substituted for CLZ (> or =80% CLZ-appropriate responding), but aripiprazole did not. The typical APDs chlorpromazine and thioridazine substituted for CLZ (fluphenazine and perphenazine did not). The serotonin (5-HT) (2A) antagonist M100907 and the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin fully substituted for CLZ. The H(1) histaminergic antagonist pyrilamine, dopamine agonist amphetamine, and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine did not substitute for CLZ. While N-desmethylclozapine did not substitute for CLZ when tested alone, N-desmethylclozapine plus a low dose of CLZ combined in an additive manner produced full substitution.

CONCLUSIONS

CLZ's discriminative cue in C57BL/6 mice is a "compound" cue mediated in part by antagonism of 5-HT(2A) and alpha(1) receptors.

Discriminative stimulus properties of atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs: a review of preclinical studies

BACKGROUND

Drug discrimination is an increasingly valuable behavioral assay for the preclinical development of antipsychotic drugs. The majority of studies have used the atypical antipsychotic clozapine because it displays robust discriminative stimulus properties and is the "prototypical" or "gold standard" atypical antipsychotic against which other antipsychotics will undoubtedly be compared for many years.

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacological mechanisms mediating the discriminative stimulus properties of antipsychotics used as training drugs and the usefulness of drug discrimination for distinguishing typical and atypical antipsychotics were reviewed.

RESULTS

Clozapine appears to have a compound cue involving antagonism of two or more receptors. While muscarinic receptor antagonism is a prominent factor for mediation of clozapine's cue in rats with a 5.0-mg/kg training dose, there are differences in clozapine's cue with a low training dose and in pigeons and mice. With a low training dose, clozapine has consistently produced full or partial generalization to atypical but not to typical antipsychotics. Although not evaluated as extensively, the atypical antipsychotics quetiapine and ziprasidone also appear to generalize to atypical but not typical antipsychotics. This has not been the case for other antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, chlorpromazine, haloperidol) used as training drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

There are important differences in discriminative stimulus properties both between and within atypical and typical antipsychotics and across species. While low-dose clozapine discrimination in rats appears to provide a more sensitive behavioral assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotics, the extent to which clozapine's discriminative stimulus properties are predictive of its antipsychotic effects remains to be determined.

The role of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine in rats

The present study examined the role of muscarinic receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine. One group of rats was trained to discriminate the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (CLZ, 5.0 mg/kg, i.p.) from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure, and a second group of rats was trained to discriminate the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine (SCP, 0.125 mg/kg, i.p.) from saline. Complete cross-generalization was obtained for SCP in the CLZ-trained rats and for CLZ in the SCP-trained rats. The M1 muscarinic antagonist trihexyphenidyl substituted completely for both CLZ and SCP; however, the M2 antagonist BIBN 99 failed to substitute for either CLZ or SCP. In other substitution tests, the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline, the antihistamine promethazine, and cyproheptadine (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]2A/5-HT2C, histamine, and muscarinic antagonist) substituted completely for CLZ and SCP. The tetracyclic antidepressant mianserin substituted completely in the CLZ-trained rats, but did not substitute for SCP. Compounds that produced partial substitution included the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine, the anxiolytic chlordiazepoxide, and the antipsychotic thioridazine. Other compounds tested only in the CLZ-trained rats that failed to produce reliable CLZ-appropriate responding included N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA, selective agonist for glutamate receptors), metergoline (5-HT2A/5-HT2C antagonist), propranolol (beta noradrenergic antagonist), and phentolamine (alpha noradrenergic antagonist). All of the compounds that produced CLZ-appropriate responding (except for mianserin) display high binding affinities for muscarinic cholinergic receptors. The results of the present study demonstrated that muscarinic receptors (especially M1) play an important role in the mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of CLZ in rats, and provide additional support for the importance of CLZ's anticholinergic properties as part of it's unique profile as an atypical antipsychotic.