1
|
Harris AM, Eayrs JO, Lavie N. Establishing gaze markers of perceptual load during multi-target visual search. Cogn Res Princ Implic 2023; 8:56. [PMID: 37648839 PMCID: PMC10468466 DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00498-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Highly-automated technologies are increasingly incorporated into existing systems, for instance in advanced car models. Although highly automated modes permit non-driving activities (e.g. internet browsing), drivers are expected to reassume control upon a 'take over' signal from the automation. To assess a person's readiness for takeover, non-invasive eye tracking can indicate their attentive state based on properties of their gaze. Perceptual load is a well-established determinant of attention and perception, however, the effects of perceptual load on a person's ability to respond to a takeover signal and the related gaze indicators are not yet known. Here we examined how load-induced attentional state affects detection of a takeover-signal proxy, as well as the gaze properties that change with attentional state, in an ongoing task with no overt behaviour beyond eye movements (responding by lingering the gaze). Participants performed a multi-target visual search of either low perceptual load (shape targets) or high perceptual load (targets were two separate conjunctions of colour and shape), while also detecting occasional auditory tones (the proxy takeover signal). Across two experiments, we found that high perceptual load was associated with poorer search performance, slower detection of cross-modal stimuli, and longer fixation durations, while saccade amplitude did not consistently change with load. Using machine learning, we were able to predict the load condition from fixation duration alone. These results suggest monitoring fixation duration may be useful in the design of systems to track users' attentional states and predict impaired user responses to stimuli outside of the focus of attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M Harris
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
- Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Joshua O Eayrs
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nilli Lavie
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Is perceptual learning always better at task-relevant locations? It depends on the distractors. Atten Percept Psychophys 2022; 84:992-1003. [PMID: 35217980 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02450-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The role of attention in task-irrelevant perceptual learning has been contested. Attention has been studied in the past using distractor-type manipulations. Hence, during an initial exposure phase, we manipulated distractor similarity within a set of six gratings, to study its effects on perceptual learning at task-relevant and task-irrelevant locations. Of these six gratings, one was at a task-relevant location, one at a task-irrelvant location, which shared the orientation with the task-relevant grating, and the rest (four) were distractor gratings. The orientations of the distractor gratings were all either the same (homogeneous) or different from each other (heterogeneity). We hypothesized that learning at the task-irrelevant location would be worse than learning at the task-relevant location when distractors are heterogeneous and vice versa when the distractors are homogeneous. Participants were initially exposed to a grating set; they reported contrast changes at only one prespecified task-relevant location. This grating was grouped based on orientation with a task-irrelevant grating presented at the furthermost distractor location and presented alongside four control-distractors (homogeneous or heterogeneous). In the testing phase, orientation discrimination performance was measured at task-relevant, task-irrelevant (grouped), and control-distractor locations. Participants were exposed and tested sequentially, each day for 5 days. Participants learned and performed better at the task-irrelevant location compared to the task-relevant location with homogenous distractors and vice versa with heterogenous distractors. The poorer learning at the task-relevant location compared to the task-irrelevant location challenges current models of perceptual learning. Selection mechanisms driven by the nature of distractors influence perceptual learning at both task-relevant and task-irrelevant locations.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Y, Yan J, Yin Z, Ren S, Dong M, Zheng C, Zhang W, Liang J. How Native Background Affects Human Performance in Real-World Visual Object Detection: An Event-Related Potential Study. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:665084. [PMID: 33994938 PMCID: PMC8119748 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.665084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual processing refers to the process of perceiving, analyzing, synthesizing, manipulating, transforming, and thinking of visual objects. It is modulated by both stimulus-driven and goal-directed factors and manifested in neural activities that extend from visual cortex to high-level cognitive areas. Extensive body of studies have investigated the neural mechanisms of visual object processing using synthetic or curated visual stimuli. However, synthetic or curated images generally do not accurately reflect the semantic links between objects and their backgrounds, and previous studies have not provided answers to the question of how the native background affects visual target detection. The current study bridged this gap by constructing a stimulus set of natural scenes with two levels of complexity and modulating participants' attention to actively or passively attend to the background contents. Behaviorally, the decision time was elongated when the background was complex or when the participants' attention was distracted from the detection task, and the object detection accuracy was decreased when the background was complex. The results of event-related potentials (ERP) analysis explicated the effects of scene complexity and attentional state on the brain responses in occipital and centro-parietal areas, which were suggested to be associated with varied attentional cueing and sensory evidence accumulation effects in different experimental conditions. Our results implied that efficient visual processing of real-world objects may involve a competition process between context and distractors that co-exist in the native background, and extensive attentional cues and fine-grained but semantically irrelevant scene information were perhaps detrimental to real-world object detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Wang
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jianpu Yan
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhongliang Yin
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| | - Shenghan Ren
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| | - Minghao Dong
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| | - Changli Zheng
- Southwest China Research Institute of Electronic Equipment, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Southwest China Research Institute of Electronic Equipment, Chengdu, China
| | - Jimin Liang
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Forgetting under difficult conditions: Item-method directed forgetting under perceptual processing constraints. Mem Cognit 2021; 49:1101-1118. [PMID: 33650022 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01149-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Intentional forgetting of unwanted items is effortful, yet directed forgetting seems to improve when a secondary task is performed. According to the cognitive load hypothesis of directed forgetting, allocating attentional resources to another task improves forgetting by restricting unwanted encoding of to-be-forgotten (TBF) items. Alternatively, it might be that anything that makes studying more difficult will encourage greater effort to perform the task well and therefore lead to improved intentional forgetting. To assess these proposals we imposed data-processing limitations on study words in an item-method directed forgetting paradigm. Across six experiments, the perceptual quality of study words was manipulated by varying: (1) the duration of study word presentation (Experiments 1-4); (2) the contrast of the displayed word against its visual background (Experiment 5); or (3) the amount of visual background noise on which the word was presented (Experiment 6). In Experiments 4-6, a lexical decision task corroborated the difficulty of study word processing. Despite evidence that relatively low visual contrast and relatively high visual background noise, in particular, create challenging conditions, we found no evidence that perceptual quality impacts the magnitude of the directed forgetting effect. This work suggests that data limitations have no discernible effect on forgetting and corroborate that only attentional resource limitations improve directed forgetting.
Collapse
|
5
|
Visual selection and response selection without effector selection in tasks with circular arrays. Atten Percept Psychophys 2020; 83:637-657. [PMID: 32909087 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02116-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Charles Eriksen and colleagues conducted influential visual-search experiments with circular arrays for which the responses were either vocal naming or unimanual left-right switch movements. These methods have the advantages of the stimuli being equidistant from a centered fixation point and allowing study of visual selection and response selection when effector selection is not required, as in the more typical case in which responses are key presses of distinct fingers. Other researchers have used similar spatial arrangements, but with aimed movements of the limb or of a mouse-controlled cursor to study effects of stimulus identification, visual search, spatial stimulus-response compatibility, response-effect compatibility, and practice/transfer in isolation and jointly. We systematically review studies in these areas that include visual selection and response selection and execution, and examine implications of their results for the role of effector selection. Also, we illustrate that as one moves from simpler to more complex tasks, the results are consistent with a basic information-processing framework in which stimulus identification and selection of a target response location are distinct from selecting, planning, and moving an effector to the targeted location.
Collapse
|
6
|
Oliva M. Pupil size and search performance in low and high perceptual load. COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 2019; 19:366-376. [PMID: 30552642 PMCID: PMC6420443 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00677-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The ability to focus on a task while disregarding irrelevant information is an example of selective attention. The perceptual-load hypothesis argues that the occurrence of early or late selection mechanisms is determined by task-relevant perceptual load. Additionally, evidence shows that pupil size serves as proxy of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) activity, a system associated with cognitive and attentional mediation. Here, we assessed pupil baseline (and pupil dilation) as predictors of load-related early and late selection performance. Participants were asked to search for a target in conditions of high and low perceptual load, while ignoring irrelevant stimuli. The results showed that pupil baseline size, measured prior trial onset, significantly predicted the upcoming search efficiency only in low perceptual load, when-according to the perceptual-load hypothesis-all perceptual information receives attentional resources. In addition, pupil dilation was linked to the time course of perceptual processing and predicted response times in both perceptual load conditions, an association that was enhanced in high load. Thus, this study relates attentional selection mechanisms, as defined by the perceptual-load theory, with pupil-related LC-NE activity. Because pupil baseline predicted attentional performance in low load but not in high load, this suggests that different attentional mechanisms are involved, one in which the LC-NE system plays a key role (low load) and one in which it is less relevant (high load). This suggests that the degree with which LC-NE influences behavioral performance is related to the perceptual load of the task at hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Oliva
- Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- MAPP, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goodhew SC, Edwards M. Translating experimental paradigms into individual-differences research: Contributions, challenges, and practical recommendations. Conscious Cogn 2019; 69:14-25. [PMID: 30685513 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Psychological science has long been cleaved by a fundamental divide between researchers who experimentally manipulate variables and those who measure existing individual-differences. Increasingly, however, researchers are appreciating the value of integrating these approaches. Here, we used visual attention research as a case-in-point for how this gap can be bridged. Traditionally, researchers have predominately adopted experimental approaches to investigating visual attention. Increasingly, however, researchers are integrating individual-differences approaches with experimental approaches to answer novel and innovative research questions. However, individual differences research challenges some of the core assumptions and practices of experimental research. The purpose of this review, therefore, is to provide a timely summary and discussion of the key issues. While these are contextualised in the field of visual attention, the discussion of these issues has implications for psychological research more broadly. In doing so, we provide eight practical recommendations for proposed solutions and novel avenues for research moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie C Goodhew
- Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia.
| | - Mark Edwards
- Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity. Atten Percept Psychophys 2018; 80:2048-2059. [PMID: 29968079 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1545-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The perceptual load theory of attentional selection argues that the degree to which distractors interfere with target processing is determined by the "perceptual load" (or discrimination difficulty) of target processing: when perceptual load is low, distractors interfere to a greater extent than when it is high. A well-known exception is load-independent interference effects from face distractors during processing of name targets. This finding was reconciled with load theory by proposing distinct processing resources for faces versus names. In the present study, we revisit this effect to test (a) whether increasing the processing overlap (perceptual, lexical, conceptual) between potential targets and distractors would reinstate the classic load effect, and (b) whether this data pattern could be better explained by load theory or by a rival account that argues that distractor dilution rather than target load determines the degree of distractor interference. Over four experiments, we first replicate the original finding and then show that load effects grow with increasing processing overlap between potential targets and distractors. However, by adding dilution conditions, we also show that these processing overlap dependent modulations of distractor interference can be explained by the distractor dilution perspective but not by perceptual load theory. Thus, our findings support a processing overlap dilution account of attentional selection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lawrence RK, Edwards M, Goodhew SC. Changes in the spatial spread of attention with ageing. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2018; 188:188-199. [PMID: 29982037 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Spatial attention is a necessary cognitive process, allowing for the direction of limited capacity resources to varying locations in the visual field for improved visual processing. Thus, understanding how ageing influences these processes is vital. The current study explored the relationship between the spatial spread of attention and healthy ageing using an inhibition of return task to tap visual attention processing. This task allowed us to measure the spatial distribution of inhibition, and thus acted as a marker for attentional spread. Past research has indicated minimal age differences in inhibitory spread. However, these studies used placeholder stimuli, which may have restricted the range over which age differences could be reliably measured. To address this, in Experiment One, we measured the relationship between the spatial spread of inhibition and healthy ageing using a method which did not employ placeholders. In contrast to past research, an age difference in inhibitory spread was observed, where in comparison to younger adults, older adults exhibited a relatively restricted spread of attention. Experiment Two then confirmed these findings, by directly comparing inhibitory spread for placeholder present and placeholder absent conditions, across younger and older adults. Again, it was found that age differences in inhibitory spread emerged, but only in the placeholder absent condition. Possible reasons for the observed age differences in attention are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca K Lawrence
- Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia.
| | - Mark Edwards
- Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia
| | - Stephanie C Goodhew
- Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
知觉负载对注视知觉适应后效的影响 <sup>*</sup>. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA 2018. [DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2018.00592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
11
|
Murphy G, Greene CM. Perceptual Load Affects Eyewitness Accuracy and Susceptibility to Leading Questions. Front Psychol 2016; 7:1322. [PMID: 27625628 PMCID: PMC5003837 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Load Theory (Lavie, 1995, 2005) states that the level of perceptual load in a task (i.e., the amount of information involved in processing task-relevant stimuli) determines the efficiency of selective attention. There is evidence that perceptual load affects distractor processing, with increased inattentional blindness under high load. Given that high load can result in individuals failing to report seeing obvious objects, it is conceivable that load may also impair memory for the scene. The current study is the first to assess the effect of perceptual load on eyewitness memory. Across three experiments (two video-based and one in a driving simulator), the effect of perceptual load on eyewitness memory was assessed. The results showed that eyewitnesses were less accurate under high load, in particular for peripheral details. For example, memory for the central character in the video was not affected by load but memory for a witness who passed by the window at the edge of the scene was significantly worse under high load. High load memories were also more open to suggestion, showing increased susceptibility to leading questions. High visual perceptual load also affected recall for auditory information, illustrating a possible cross-modal perceptual load effect on memory accuracy. These results have implications for eyewitness memory researchers and forensic professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Murphy
- School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork Cork, Ireland
| | - Ciara M Greene
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|