Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for the High-throughput Analysis of Clinical Samples of Ivacaftor, Its Major Metabolites, and Lumacaftor in Biological Fluids of Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Fetal drug exposure after maternally administered CFTR modulators Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in a rat model

BACKGROUND

The potential effects of the very effective cystic fibrosis triple combination drug, Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI) in pregnancy on prenatal development of offspring remain largely unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We aimed to investigate the fetal tissue distribution pattern of maternally administered ETI by placental transfer in the rat fetuses.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Sprague Dawley pregnant rats were administered ETI (6.7 mg/kg/d elexacaftor + 3.5 mg/kg/d tezacaftor + 25 mg/kg/d ivacaftor) traced with [3 H]-ivacaftor in single dose acute experiments (intraperitoneal injection) or treated orally with ETI (the same dose) for 7 days in sub-chronic experiments. Fetal tissue samples were collected at embryonic day (E) 19 and analyzed using liquid scintillation counting for acute experiments or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for sub-chronic experiments.

RESULTS

On day E19, after acute exposure, the entry of ivacaftor into fetal brain (brain/plasma concentration ratios <50%) was significantly lower than to other tissues (>100%). However, after sub-chronic exposure, the entry of all 3 components into the developing brain was comparably extensive as into other tissues (tissue/plasma ratios, 260 - 1000%). Each component of ETI accumulated in different fetal tissues to approximately equal extent. Inter-litter differences on fetal drug distribution were found in cortex for ivacaftor, muscle for tezacaftor and cortex and mid/hindbrain for elexacaftor. Fetal plasma concentrations of ETI (ng/mL) were variable between litters. The entry of ivacaftor and tezacaftor into adult brain appeared to be restricted (<100%).

INTERPRETATION

Fetal rats are exposed to maternally ingested ETI after sub-chronic exposure, potentially impacting fetal development. The brain entry data highlights the need for attention be paid to any long-term potential effects ETI exposure could have on normal brain development.

Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing for pediatric cystic fibrosis patients: recent advances and future outlooks

INTRODUCTION

Medicine use in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is complicated by inconsistent pharmacokinetics at variance with the general population, a lack of research into this and its effects on clinical outcomes. In the absence of established dose regimens, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a clinically relevant tool to optimize drug exposure and maximize therapeutic effect by the bedside. In clinical practice though, use of this is variable and limited by a lack of expert recommendations.

AREAS COVERED

We aimed to review the use of TDM in children with CF to summarize recent developments, current recommendations, and opportunities for future directions. We searched PubMed for relevant publications using the broad search terms "cystic fibrosis" in combination with the specific terms "therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)" and "children." Further searches were undertaken using the name of identified drugs combined with the term "TDM."

EXPERT OPINION

Further research into the use of Bayesian forecasting and the relationship between exposure and response is required to personalize dosing, with the opportunity for the development of expert recommendations in children with CF. Use of noninvasive methods of TDM has the potential to improve accessibility to TDM in this cohort.

Ivacaftor Alters Macrophage and Lymphocyte Infiltration in the Lungs Following Lipopolysaccharide Exposure

Background and purpose: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is associated with a myriad of respiratory complications including increased susceptibility to lung infections and inflammation. Progressive inflammatory insults lead to airway damage and remodeling, resulting in compromised lung function. Treatment with ivacaftor significantly improves respiratory function and reduces the incidence of pulmonary exacerbations; however, its effect on lung inflammation is yet to be fully elucidated. Experimental approach: This study investigates the effects of ivacaftor on lung inflammation in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure mouse model (C57BL/6). All groups received intratracheal (IT) administration of LPS (10 μg). Prophylactic treatment involved intraperitoneal injections of ivacaftor (40 mg/kg) once a day beginning 4 days prior to LPS challenge. The therapeutic group received a single intraperitoneal ivacaftor injection (40 mg/kg) directly after LPS. Mice were culled either 24 or 72 h after LPS challenge, and serum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and lung tissue samples were collected. The degree of inflammation was assessed through cell infiltration, cytokine expression, and histological analysis. Key results: Ivacaftor did not decrease the total number of immune cells within the BALF; however, prophylactic treatment did significantly reduce macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration. Prophylactic treatment exhibited a significant negative correlation between the immune cell number and ivacaftor concentrations in BALF; however, no significant changes in the cytokine expression or histological parameters were determined. Conclusions and implications: Ivacaftor possesses some inherent immunomodulatory effects within the lungs following LPS inoculation; however, further analysis of larger sample sizes is required to confirm the results.

Isotope dilution LC-MS/MS quantification of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor, and their major metabolites in human serum

OBJECTIVES

Cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape in CF treatment. These vital drugs are extensively metabolized via CYP3A, so caution must be exercised in multimodal CF therapy because of the risk of adverse drug interactions. Our goal was to develop a highly sensitive assay for the purpose of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in diagnostic laboratories.

METHODS

After protein precipitation, the CFTR modulators ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor, and their metabolites ivacaftor-M1, ivacaftor-M6, and tezacaftor-M1 were separated with a two-dimensional chromatography setup within 5 min, and quantified with stable isotope-labeled internal standards. The method was validated according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline on bioanalytical method validation and applied to CF patient samples.

RESULTS

Inaccuracy was ≤7.0% and the imprecision coefficient of variation (CV) was ≤8.3% for all quality controls (QCs). The method consistently compensated for matrix effects, recovery, and process efficiency were 105-115 and 96.5-103%, respectively. Analysis of CF serum samples provided concentrations comparable to the pharmacokinetic profile data reported in the EMA assessment report for the triple combination therapy Kaftrio.

CONCLUSIONS

We hereby present a robust and highly selective isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) assay for the simultaneous quantification of the so far approved CFTR modulators and their metabolites in human serum. The assay is suitable for state-of-the-art pharmacovigilance of CFTR modulator therapy in CF patients, in order to maximize safety and efficacy, and also to establish dose-response relationships in clinical trials.

Lumacaftor-ivacaftor effects on cystic fibrosis-related liver involvement in adolescents with homozygous F508 del-CFTR

BACKGROUND

The effects of lumacaftor-ivacaftor on cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-associated liver disease remain unclear. The objective of the study was to describe the effect of this treatment on features of liver involvement in a cystic fibrosis (CF) adolescent population homozygous for F508del.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics, liver blood tests, abdominal ultrasonography (US), and pancreas and liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) by magnetic resonance imaging, were obtained at treatment initiation and at 12 months for all patients. Biomarkers of CFTR activity (sweat chloride test, nasal potential difference, and intestinal current measurement) were assessed at initiation and at 6 months therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 37 patients who started ivacaftor/lumacaftor treatment, 28 were eligible for analysis. In this group, before treatment initiation, 4 patients were diagnosed with multinodular liver and portal hypertension, 19 with other forms of CF liver involvement, and 5 with no signs of liver involvement. During treatment, no hepatic adverse reactions were documented, and no patient developed liver failure. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gammaglutamyl transferase (GGT) decreased significantly following initiation of lumacaftor-ivacaftor, and remained so after 12 months treatment. This was not correlated with changes in clinical status, liver and pancreas US and PDFF, fecal elastase, or lumacaftor-ivacaftor serum levels. The most "responsive" patients demonstrated a significant increase in biomarkers of CFTR activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may suggest a potential beneficial effect of CFTR modulators on CF liver disease and warrant further investigation in larger, prospective studies.

Insights Into Patient Variability During Ivacaftor-Lumacaftor Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis

Background: The advent of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein (CFTR) modulators like ivacaftor have revolutionised the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF). However, due to the plethora of variances in disease manifestations in CF, there are inherent challenges in unified responses under CFTR modulator treatment arising from variability in patient outcomes. The pharmacokinetic (PK) data available for ivacaftor-lumacaftor cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drug combination is limited. Methods: Secondary objectives were to identify (1) patient characteristics and (2) the interactions between ivacaftor-lumacaftor responsible for interindividual variability (IIV). Results: Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of ivacaftor - lumacaftor were >10 fold lower than expected compared to label information. The one-way ANOVA indicated that the patient site had an effect on Cmax values of ivacaftor metabolites ivacaftor-M1, ivacaftor-M6, and lumacaftor (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The Spearman's rho test indicated that patient weight and age have an effect on the Cmax of lumacaftor (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively) and ivacaftor metabolite M1 (p = 0.020 and p < 0.001, respectively). Age (p < 0.001) was found to effect on Cmax of ivacaftor M6 and on Tmax of ivacaftor M1 (p = 0.026). A large impact of patient characteristics on the IIV of PK parameters Cmax and Tmax, was observed among the CF patients. Conclusion: Understanding the many sources of variability can help reduce this individual patient variability and ensure consistent patient outcomes.

Quantitative Method for the Analysis of Ivacaftor, Hydroxymethyl Ivacaftor, Ivacaftor Carboxylate, Lumacaftor, and Tezacaftor in Plasma and Sputum Using Liquid Chromatography With Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Its Clinical Applicability

BACKGROUND

The novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, ivacaftor, lumacaftor, and tezacaftor, are the first drugs directly targeting the underlying pathophysiological mechanism in cystic fibrosis (CF); however, independent studies describing their pharmacokinetics are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a quantification method for ivacaftor and its 2 main metabolites, lumacaftor and tezacaftor, in plasma and sputum using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

METHODS

The developed method used a small sample volume (20 µL) and simple pretreatment method; protein precipitation solution and internal standard were added in one step to each sample. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was performed for a total run time of 6 minutes. The method was validated by assessing selectivity, carryover, linearity, accuracy and precision, dilution, matrix effects, and stability.

RESULTS

The selectivity was good as no interference from matrices was observed. In the concentration range from 0.01 to 10.0 mg/L, calibration curves were linear with a correlation coefficient >0.9997 for all compounds. The within-run and between-run accuracy were between 99.7% and 116% at the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and between 95.8% and 112.9% for all concentrations above LLOQ for all analytes in plasma and sputum. Within-run and between-run precisions were <12.7% for LLOQ and <6.7% for the higher limit of quantitation. Samples were stable, with no significant degradation at examined temperatures and time points. Clinical applicability was revealed by analyzing samples from 2 patients with CF.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented method enables simultaneous quantification of ivacaftor, lumacaftor, and tezacaftor in plasma and sputum and is an improvement over previous methods because it uses smaller sample volumes, a simple pretreatment protocol, and includes tezacaftor. In future studies, it can be applied for examining pharmacokinetics characteristics of new CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators.

Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for the Drug Monitoring of Ivacaftor, Tezacaftor, and Elexacaftor Treatment Response in Cystic Fibrosis: A High-Throughput Method

Ivacaftor-tezacaftor and ivacaftor-tezacaftor-elexacaftor are new breakthrough cystic fibrosis (CF) drug combinations that directly modulate the activity and trafficking of the defective CF transmembrane conductance regulator protein (CFTR) underlying the CF disease state. Currently, in the hospital setting, there are no therapeutic drug monitoring assays for these very expensive, albeit, life-saving drugs. A rapid and precise novel method for the quantification of ivacaftor, its metabolites, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor, in human plasma was developed and validated using multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM/MS). The MRM/MS analytical method was validated at a concentration range of 0.0025-1 μg/mL for ivacaftor, ivacaftor-M1, ivacaftor-M6, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor in human plasma. The method displayed good accuracy (90.62-94.51%) and reproducibility (99.91-100%) including at low concentrations 0.01 μg/mL. With a mobile phase consisting of [acetonitrile/water]/0.1% formic acid (70:30 v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, a linear correlation was observed over a concentration range of 0.0025-1 μg/mL in human plasma for ivacaftor (R ² = 0.9865105), ivacaftor-M1 (R ² = 0.9852684), ivacaftor-M6 (R ² = 0.9911764), tezacaftor (R ² = 0.98742470), and elexacaftor (R ² = 0.9897608). The reported method can accurately quantify ivacaftor, ivacaftor-M1, ivacaftor-M6, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor at low concentrations in human plasma. We have established a cost-efficient and timely method for measuring ivacaftor, its metabolites, and tezacaftor with or without elexacaftor in human plasma suitable for high-throughput applications in the hospital settings or clinical trials.

Cytochrome P450 3A4 Induction: Lumacaftor versus Ivacaftor Potentially Resulting in Significantly Reduced Plasma Concentration of Ivacaftor

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Since the release of ivacaftor-lumacaftor, several red-flags have been raised that highlight the clinical efficacy of this combination strategy that may be limited due to antagonistic drug-drug interactions.

METHOD

The effect of ivacaftor, its major metabolites M1 and M6, lumacaftor and the novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator tezacaftor at 10 µg/mL on the enzymatic activity of the major xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 as well as the minor enzymes CYP2B6 and CYP2C9 was assayed.

RESULTS

Lumacaftor (3.74 x 105 ± 3.11 x 104 RLU), and ivacaftor-M6 (3.43 x 105 ± 7.61 x 103 RLU) markedly induced the activity of CYP3A4. Ivacaftor (2.22 x 105 ± 3.94 x 104 RLU) showed a lower relative ratio of luminescence units compared to chloramphenicol (3.17 x 105 ± 1.55 x 104 RLU). Interestingly, ivacaftor-M1 (6.74 x 104 ± 3.09 x 104 RLU) and the novel CFTR modulator tezacaftor (2.40 x 104 ± 8.14 x 104 RLU) did not show CYP3A4 induction. In the CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 assay, all metabolites showed a decrease in the ratio of luminescence units compared to the controls. Ivacaftor, its major metabolites, lumacaftor and tezacaftor all showed a slight increase in the ratio of luminescence units compared to the control rifampin with CYP2B6.

CONCLUSION

All in all, present findings would suggest that lumacaftor and ivacaftor-M6 are strong inducers of CYP3A4, potentially reducing ivacaftor concentrations; ivacaftor itself induces CYP3A4 to some extent.