1
|
Morgan JE, Jaferi N, Shonibare Z, Huang GS. ARID1A in Gynecologic Precancers and Cancers. Reprod Sci 2024:10.1007/s43032-024-01585-w. [PMID: 38740655 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
The highest frequency of genetic alterations in the tumor suppressor ARID1A occurs in malignancies of the female reproductive tract. The prevalence of ARID1A alterations in gynecologic precancers and cancers is summarized from the literature, and the putative mechanisms of tumor suppressive action examined both in benign/precursor lesions including endometriosis and atypical hyperplasia and in malignancies of the ovary, uterus, cervix and vagina. ARID1A alterations in gynecologic cancers are usually loss-of-function mutations, resulting in diminished or absent protein expression. ARID1A deficiency results in pleiotropic downstream effects related not only to its role in transcriptional regulation as a SWI/SNF complex subunit, but also related to the functions of ARID1A in DNA replication and repair, immune modulation, cell cycle progression, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and oxidative stress. The most promising actionable signaling pathway interactions and therapeutic vulnerabilities of ARID1A mutated cancers are presented with a critical review of the currently available experimental and clinical evidence. The role of ARID1A in response to chemotherapeutic agents, radiation therapy and immunotherapy is also addressed. In summary, the multi-faceted role of ARID1A mutation in precancer and cancer is examined through a clinical lens focused on development of novel preventive and therapeutic interventions for gynecological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaida E Morgan
- Yale College, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Nishah Jaferi
- Yale College, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zainab Shonibare
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Gloria S Huang
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT, 06520-8063, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aroche Gutierrez LL, McIntire DD, Lea J, LoCoco S, Miller DS. Social determinants of health in uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:117-122. [PMID: 38309028 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE UCS survival outcome disparities by race have been reported. We aimed to investigate social determinants of health (SDOH) and their relation to survival outcomes in women at two affiliated high-volume institutions serving a racially and economically diverse population. METHODS Women diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS treated at St. Paul University Hospital, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Zale Lipshy Pavilion-William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital, and Parkland Memorial Hospital between 1992 and 2022 were eligible. Patients were identified by the local tumor registries; a retrospective study was conducted. The Pearson chi-square test was utilized for categorical variables. OS and PFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4. RESULTS Over half of the 218 patients with UCS were NHB. 35% of the patients had stage IV disease. Most HSP and NHB patients had a lower median household income* than Asian/Pacific Islander (API) or NHW (p < 0.001). Stage at diagnosis significantly affected OS (p < 0.001) but not PFS (p = 0.46) in univariate analyses. Accounting for age at diagnosis, insurance, income*, hospital, distance between hospital and home, months from diagnosis to first treatment, stage, and adjuvant therapy, race was significant for OS (p = 0.03) and PFS (p = 0.04). *Median household income by ZIP Code. CONCLUSIONS Racial disparities were seen in median household income. Most SDOH independently analyzed in this study did not affect OS. The complex interaction between race and stage in UCS survival outcomes needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa L Aroche Gutierrez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of General Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Donald D McIntire
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Jayanthi Lea
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Salvatore LoCoco
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - David Scott Miller
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang LS, Zhou YW, Wang JL, Zhang GX, Xu CH, Liu JY, Qiu M. Epidemiology, site-specific characteristics and survival of carcinosarcoma: a retrospective study based on SEER database. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077974. [PMID: 38101828 PMCID: PMC10729011 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Carcinosarcoma (CS) is a rare and biphasic malignancy characterised by a highly invasive biological nature and poor prognosis. This study explored the epidemiology, site-specific characteristics and survival outcome of CS. DESIGN We conducted a retrospective study in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975-2018) for primary CS. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS SEER database includes publicly available information from regional and state cancer registries in the US centres. A total of 5042 CS patients were identified. We selected the top five anatomic CS (uterus, double adnexa, lung, bladder and breast) patients for further analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Incidence was estimated by geographical region, age, sex, race, stage and primary site. Trends were calculated using joinpoint regression. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate and initial treatment were summarised. RESULTS Nearly 80% of CS occurred in the uterus and double adnexa, followed by lung, bladder and breast. The elderly and black population presented the highest age-adjusted rate of CS. The rates of distant metastasis in CS progressively increased from 1989 to 2018. Atlanta was the area with the highest incidence at 0.7 per 100 000. Pulmonary and bladder CS more frequently occurred in men and were diagnosed with regional stage. Distant metastasis was mostly found in ovary/fallopian tube CS. Radiotherapy was more commonly applied in uterine CS, while adnexa CS cases were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Multiple treatments were more used in breast CS. Pulmonary CS seemed to suffer worse CSS (median: 9.92 months), for which radiotherapy might not provide survival benefits (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.86). Compared with the common histological types in each site, CS had the shortest survival. CONCLUSIONS CS has unique clinical features in each primary site. Substantial prognosis variances exist based on tumour locations. The aggressive course is the common feature in CS at all sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian-Sha Tang
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-Wen Zhou
- Department of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jia-Ling Wang
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guo-Xu Zhang
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chen-Hao Xu
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ji-Yan Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Meng Qiu
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Collet L, González López AM, Romeo C, Méeus P, Chopin N, Rossi L, Rowinski E, Serre AA, Rannou C, Buisson A, Treilleux I, Ray-Coquard I. Gynecological carcinosarcomas: Overview and future perspectives. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:1215-1226. [PMID: 37679206 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Gynecologic carcinosarcoma (CS) are rare and aggressive tumors composed of high-grade carcinoma and sarcoma. Carcinosarcoma account for less than 5% of uterine and ovarian carcinoma and patients have poor outcome with a 5-year overall survival of less than 30%. In early-stage setting, the treatment mainstay is surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine (UCS) and ovarian CS (OCS), respectively. In metastatic or advanced stage disease, chemotherapy is the rule with a lower response rate and poorer prognosis compared to other high-grade carcinomas. Although very few treatment options are available, CS are often excluded from the clinical trials precluding therapeutic improvement. However, recent molecular advances are paving the way for new therapeutic strategies. In the current proposal, we extensively review the uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas including epidemiology, pathology, genomic landscape, as well as current therapies and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laetitia Collet
- Institut Jules-Bordet, Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Bruxelles, Belgium; Institut Jules-Bordet, Department of Medical Oncology, Bruxelles, Belgium; Centre Leon-Berard, Department of Medical Oncology, Lyon, France.
| | | | - Clémence Romeo
- Centre Leon-Berard, Department of Medical Oncology, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Méeus
- Centre Leon-Berard, Department of Surgery, Lyon, France
| | | | - Léa Rossi
- Centre Leon-Berard, Department of Surgery, Lyon, France
| | - Elise Rowinski
- Centre Leon-Berard, Department of Medical Oncology, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Adrien Buisson
- Centre Leon-Berard, Department of Biology molecular, Lyon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al Amri W, Al Salmi I, Al Nabhani SK, Al Hatrooshi BS. A rare and challenging case of uterine mass successfully reported in a cervical smear. Cytojournal 2023; 20:35. [PMID: 37810441 PMCID: PMC10559489 DOI: 10.25259/cytojournal_37_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed Al Amri
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman
| | - Ishaq Al Salmi
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman
| | - Safia K. Al Nabhani
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng W. Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer and the 2023 FIGO Staging: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Pathologists. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4101. [PMID: 37627129 PMCID: PMC10452831 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This commentary explores the complexities of the FIGO 2023 staging system and the inclusion of The Cancer Genome Atlas's (TCGA) molecular classification in the management of endometrial cancer. It highlights the importance of histology as a prognostic tool, while scrutinizing the merits and demerits of its application to aggressive endometrial cancers. The commentary review sheds light on the recent introductions of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis size in cancer staging. It outlines the difficulties in differentiating between synchronous and metastatic endometrial and ovarian cancers, underlining their implications on treatment strategies. Furthermore, the commentary discusses the integration of molecular classifications within the FIGO 2023 framework, emphasizing the pivotal yet challenging implementation of the pathogenic POLE mutation test. The commentary concludes by reaffirming the vital role of pathologists in executing the FIGO 2023 staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxin Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Erdogan EG, Yalta TD, Can N, Süt N, Taştekin E, Usta U, Puyan FÖ, Usturalı Keskin FE, Kurt BB. Clinicopathological and molecular analyses of uterine carcinosarcomas using next-generation sequencing: A single-center experience. INDIAN J PATHOL MICR 2023; 66:449-455. [PMID: 37530323 DOI: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_777_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCS) constitute 3-4% of all uterine malignancies and 16% of deaths caused due to uterine neoplasms. Aim In this study, we aimed to perform DNA-based mutation analysis in 12 genes (KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, C-KIT, BRAF, PDGFRA, ALK, ERBB2, ERBB3, ESR1, RAF1, PIK3CA) to determine the molecular subtypes of UCS using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with aggressive UCS and poor prognosis. We aimed to compare the results of our analysis with clinicopathological data to contribute to the development of targeted therapy approaches related to the molecular changes of UCS. Materials and Methods In this study, we included 12 cases diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcomas and examined the changes in oncogenes that play a role in UCS pathogenesis. For the analysis of mutation, the clinicopathological data were compared with the variations in the DNA-based gene panel consisting of 12 genes and 1237 variants in the UCS using the NGS method. Results EGFR mutation was found in 91.7% of the cases, mutation in 41.7%, PDGFRA mutation in 25%, KRAS and PIK3CA mutation in 16.7%, and C-KIT mutation in 8.3% of the cases. Although no statistical significance was found between the detected mutation and clinicopathological data, it was concluded that PDGFRA mutation might be associated with advanced-stage disease development. Conclusion This study's findings regarding different molecular types of UCS and information on oncogenesis of UCS can provide inferences for targeted therapies in the future by identifying targetable mutations representing early oncogenic events and thereby contribute toward further studies on this subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezgi Genc Erdogan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne; Department of Pathology, Lüleburgaz State Hospital, Kırklareli, Turkey
| | - Tülin D Yalta
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Nuray Can
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Necdet Süt
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Ebru Taştekin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Ufuk Usta
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Fulya Öz Puyan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | | | - Busem B Kurt
- Department of Pathology, Tekirdağ State Hospital, Tekirdağ, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sia TY, Gordhandas SB, Birsoy O, Kemel Y, Maio A, Salo-Mullen E, Sheehan M, Hensley ML, Rubinstein M, Makker V, Grisham RN, O'Cearbhaill RE, Roche KL, Mueller JJ, Leitao MM, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Berger MF, Ellenson LH, Latham A, Stadler Z, Offit K, Aghajanian C, Weigelt B, Mandelker D, Liu YL. Germline drivers of gynecologic carcinosarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:34-41. [PMID: 37149903 PMCID: PMC10330315 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in endometrial and ovarian carcinosarcomas and determine if gPVs are drivers of carcinosarcoma. METHODS Patients with endometrial or ovarian carcinosarcomas who underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing from 1/1/2015 to 6/1/2021 and consented to germline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes were included. In patients with gPVs, biallelic inactivation was identified through analysis of loss of heterozygosity and somatic pathogenic alterations. RESULTS Of 216 patients identified, 167 (77%) were diagnosed with endometrial carcinosarcoma and 49 (23%) with ovarian carcinosarcoma. Overall, 33 gPVs were observed in 29 patients (13%); 20 gPVs (61%) had biallelic loss in tumors. The rate of high-penetrance gPVs overall was 7% (16 of 216); 88% of high-penetrance gPVs had biallelic loss. In the endometrial carcinosarcoma cohort, 22 gPVs were found in 19 (11%) of 167 patients; 12 gPVs (55%) had biallelic loss in tumors, including 8 (89%) of 9 in high-penetrance gPVs. Among the ovarian carcinosarcoma cohort, 11 gPVs were found in 10 (20%) of 49 patients; 8 gPVs (73%) had biallelic loss in tumors, and all evaluable high-penetrance gPVs (n = 6) had biallelic loss. All gPVs in homologous recombination (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C) and Lynch syndrome (MSH2, MSH6) genes had biallelic loss in tumors (n = 15). CONCLUSIONS gPVs in genes affecting homologous recombination- or Lynch-associated mismatch repair exhibited biallelic inactivation within tumors, suggesting likely drivers of gynecologic carcinosarcoma. Our data support germline testing for patients with gynecologic carcinosarcomas, given implications for treatment and risk-reduction in patients and at-risk family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sushmita B Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ozge Birsoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Sheehan
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martee L Hensley
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Rubinstein
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kundu R, Shastri M, Gupta P, Gupta N, Srinivasan R, Dey P. Effusion cytology of metastatic carcinosarcoma. Cytojournal 2023; 20:14. [PMID: 37405308 PMCID: PMC10316228 DOI: 10.25259/cytojournal_30_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Carcinosarcomas (CSs) are rare gynecological neoplasms seen in elderly females. These are composed of malignant epithelial and mesenchymal components, which appear as adenocarcinoma and high-grade sarcoma. Effusions are encountered uncommonly in CS. Material and Methods The study focuses on the cytomorphology of 10 cases of metastatic CS in effusions. In 6 years, there were 10 (0.45%) cases of metastatic CS in effusion samples out of 2240 malignant effusion samples. The samples were processed by SurePath™ and centrifuge technique. Both May-Grünwald-Giemsa and Papanicolaou stained smears were evaluated for cytomorphological features, and the findings were correlated with subsequent histopathology. Results The cells were predominantly arranged in ball-like clusters and discretely. The cells had abundant vacuolated cytoplasm and enlarged pleomorphic nuclei. Occasional cases showed scattered spindle cells. The cases were diagnosed as metastatic adenocarcinoma (7/10) and positive for malignant cells (3/10). None of the cases was diagnosed as CS. The primary of these cases was in the uterus (7/10) and ovary (3/10). Conclusion The cytological evaluation of such effusion samples rarely demonstrates the classical biphasic pattern of these tumors. Mostly, the carcinomatous component is evident, and the sarcomatous element is inapparent and readily missed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetu Kundu
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Malvika Shastri
- Department of Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Parikshaa Gupta
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Nalini Gupta
- Department of Cytology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Radhika Srinivasan
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pranab Dey
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Matsuo K, Matsuzaki S, Maeda M, Rau AR, Yoshihara K, Tamura R, Shimada M, Machida H, Mikami M, Klar M, Roman LD, Wright JD, Sood AK, Gershenson DM. Uptake and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among US Patients With Less Common Epithelial Ovarian Carcinomas. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2318602. [PMID: 37326992 PMCID: PMC10276312 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Randomized clinical trials examining the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer predominantly included patients with high-grade serous carcinomas. The use and outcomes of NACT in less common epithelial carcinomas are understudied. Objective To investigate the uptake and survival outcomes in treatment with NACT for less common histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cohort study and systematic literature review with meta-analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2017 and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2006 to 2019. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to April 2023. The evaluation included patients with stage III to IV ovarian cancer with clear cell, mucinous, or low-grade serous histologic subtypes who received multimodal treatment with surgery and chemotherapy. Exposures Exposure assignment per the sequence of treatment: primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy (PDS group) or NACT followed by interval surgery (NACT group). Main Outcomes and Measures Temporal trends and characteristics of NACT use were assessed using multivariable analysis, and overall survival (OS) was assessed with the inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. Results A total of 3880 patients were examined in the National Cancer Database including 1829 women (median age, 56 [IQR, 49-63] years) with clear cell, 1156 women (median age, 53 [IQR, 42-64] years) with low-grade serous, and 895 women (median age, 57 [IQR, 48-66] years) with mucinous carcinomas. NACT use increased in patients with clear cell (from 10.2% to 16.2%, 58.8% relative increase; P < .001 for trend) or low-grade serous (from 7.7% to 14.2%, 84.4% relative increase; P = .007 for trend) carcinoma during the study period. This association remained consistent in multivariable analysis. NACT use also increased, but nonsignificantly, in mucinous carcinomas (from 8.6% to 13.9%, 61.6% relative increase; P = .07 for trend). Across the 3 histologic subtypes, older age and stage IV disease were independently associated with NACT use. In a propensity score-weighted model, the NACT and PDS groups had comparable OS for clear cell (4-year rates, 31.4% vs 37.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.33) and mucinous (27.0% vs 26.7%; HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.68-1.19) carcinomas. For patients with low-grade serous carcinoma, NACT was associated with decreased OS compared with PDS (4-year rates, 56.4% vs 81.0%; HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.55-2.90). Increasing NACT use and histologic subtype-specific survival association were also found in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program cohort (n = 1447). A meta-analysis of 4 studies, including the current study, observed similar OS associations for clear cell (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.34; 2 studies), mucinous (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.71-1.21; 2 studies), and low-grade serous (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.63-2.74; 3 studies) carcinomas. Conclusions and Relevance Despite the lack of data on outcomes of NACT among patients with less common carcinomas, this study noted that NACT use for advanced disease has gradually increased in the US. Primary chemotherapy for advanced-stage, low-grade serous ovarian cancer may be associated with worse survival compared with PDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Shinya Matsuzaki
- Department of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michihide Maeda
- Department of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Alesandra R. Rau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Kosuke Yoshihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan
| | - Ryo Tamura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan
| | - Muneaki Shimada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lynda D. Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Jason D. Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Anil K. Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - David M. Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Trends in Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma Based on Analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology End Result (SEER) Database. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031188. [PMID: 36769835 PMCID: PMC9917500 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors) of a female genital organ are rare tumors associated with a poor survival. The purpose of this study was to identify site-specific differences in the incidence and prognosis in carcinosarcomas originating in the uterus, cervix, or ovary. The data of patients with gynecologic carcinosarcomas were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2016. The characteristics of gynecologic carcinosarcomas were compared using Pearson X2 and Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier models were used for cause-specific survival (CSS) analysis. The cohort included 7086 females, including 5731 cases of uterine carcinosarcoma, 161 cervical carcinosarcomas, and 1193 ovarian carcinosarcomas. The age-adjusted incidence rates of uterine, cervical, and ovarian carcinosarcoma were 3.9, 0.1, and 0.6 per 1,000,000, respectively. In the distribution of carcinosarcoma incidence by race, compared with the uterus or cervix, those originating from the ovary were unequally distributed in Caucasians (84.4% versus 69.6%, 67.7%; p < 0.001). The incidence of uterine carcinosarcoma steadily increased over time, from 2.2 in 2000 to 5.5 in 2016 (per 1,000,000), while cervical or ovarian carcinosarcoma showed no significant difference in incidence. The five-year CSS rates based on the site of origin (uterus, cervix, and ovary) were 39.9%, 33.1%, and 25.8%, respectively. The incidence rates of gynecologic carcinosarcoma, especially uterine carcinosarcoma, are gradually increasing. Although uterine carcinosarcoma is associated with a higher incidence than the others, it has a better prognosis compared with ovarian and cervical carcinosarcoma. The survival rates were worst in ovarian carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
|
12
|
Tuan HX, Duc NM, Tri CM, Quyen HTD, Dung PX. Carcinosarcoma of uterus. Radiol Case Rep 2023; 18:1297-1301. [PMID: 36684637 PMCID: PMC9851838 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.12.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma, which is categorized as high-grade endometrial cancer, is an uncommon kind of malignant gynecological neoplasms. Clinically, this tumor frequently affects menopausal women and the main symptom is abnormally postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Surgery continues to be the main treatment for carcinosarcoma. In this study, we wanted to discuss 2 cases of uterine carcinosarcoma in 2 women who were in menopause and who had been evaluated by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho Xuan Tuan
- Department of Medical Imaging, Da Nang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy, Da Nang, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Minh Duc
- Department of Radiology, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam,Department of Radiology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, 2 Duong Quang Trung Ward 12 District 10, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam,Corresponding author.
| | - Cao Minh Tri
- Department of Radiology, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Huynh-Thi Do Quyen
- Department of Radiology, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Pham Xuan Dung
- Director Board, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kim SI, Kim JH, Lee C, Ha J, Jung KW, Lim MC. Incidence and survival rates of primary uterine carcinosarcoma in Korea: a National Cancer Registry study. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e9. [PMID: 36366811 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence and survival rates of primary uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) in Korea. METHODS From the Korea Central Cancer Registry, we identified patients diagnosed with primary UCS between 1999 and 2018 and collected their information, including age at diagnosis, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage, and treatment. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated. Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared by study periods, ages, and stages at initial diagnosis. RESULTS Overall, the incidence rate of primary UCS increased markedly during the time period: ASRs, 0.02 per 100,000 in 1999 and 0.25 per 100,000 in 2018 (APC, 13.9%; p<0.001). No difference in OS was observed between patients diagnosed in 1999-2008 and those diagnosed in 2009-2018 (5-year survival rate, 46.0% vs. 48.6%; p=0.871). Considering the mean patient age at diagnosis of UCS, we divided the study population into 2 groups. Patients aged ≥60 years had a more frequent prior radiation history, received less multi-modality treatment, and showed worse OS than those aged <60 years (5-year survival rate, 42.7% vs. 53.6%; p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, both old age at diagnosis (≥60 years) and the SEER summary stage were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for OS, whereas radiation history before the diagnosis of UCS was not. CONCLUSION The incidence rate of UCS in Korea increased significantly from 1999 to 2018. Advanced stage and old age (≥60 years) at diagnosis might be poor prognostic factors for survival, but not prior radiation history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Cheol Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Johyun Ha
- Korea Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Division of Cancer Registration and Surveillance, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyu-Won Jung
- Korea Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Division of Cancer Registration and Surveillance, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Department of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Rare & Pediatric Cancer Branch and Immuno-oncology Branch, Division of Rare and Refractory Cancer, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
da Silva JL, de Albuquerque LZ, Rodrigues FR, Bastos NC, Small IA, Barroso EBC, Cordero FL, Fernandes DDS, Paulino E, de Melo AC. Exploring biomarkers and prognostic factors in uterine carcinosarcoma: An insight into L1CAM, CDX2, p53, and MSI status. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285447. [PMID: 37200263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine Carcinosarcomas (UCS) are a rare type of cancer composed of an admixture of high-grade carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. Clinicopathological prognostic factors in UCS are well established, but studies that approach the impact of biomarkers in this unusual disease are scarce. The study objective was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impact of a panel of prominent biomarkers in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) using an immunohistochemical characterization with four biomarkers. METHODS AND FINDINGS The internal database of a single Brazilian institution was carefully explored to select women diagnosed with UCS who were submitted to surgery and postoperative chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel between January 2012 and December 2017. Tissue microarrays containing UCS samples were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for L1CAM, CDX2, p53 and microsatellite instability markers. A total of 57 cases were included. The mean age was 65.3 years (standard deviation, SD 7.0). L1CAM was negative (score 0, no staining) in 27 (47.4%) patients. Of L1CAM-positive, 10 (17.5%) showed weak (score 1, <10%), 6 (10.5%) showed moderate (score 2, between 10-50%), and 14 (24.6%) showed strong L1CAM staining (score 3, ≧50%). dMMR occurred in 3 (5.3%) cases. The p53 was aberrantly expressed in 15 (26.3%) tumors. CDX2 was positive in 3 (5.3%) patients. The three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate in the general population of the study was 21.2% (95% CI: 11.7-38.1) and the three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 29.4% (95% CI: 18.1-47.6). By multivariate analysis, the presence of metastases and CDX2-positive were significantly associated with poorer PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION The strong influence of CDX2 on prognosis requires further investigation. Biological or molecular variability may have impaired the assessment of the impact of the other markers on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Lopes da Silva
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lucas Zanetti de Albuquerque
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Isabele Avila Small
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando Lopes Cordero
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Paulino
- Clinical Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Andreia Cristina de Melo
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen M, He X, Yang Q, Zhang J, Peng J, Wang D, Tong K, Huang W. Epidemiology and prediction model of patients with carcinosarcoma in the United States. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1038211. [PMID: 36518582 PMCID: PMC9742429 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Carcinosarcoma is a rare biphasic tumor composed of both carcinoma and sarcoma elements, which occurs at various sites. Most studies are case reports or small population-based studies for a single disease site, so comprehensive evaluations of epidemiology and prognostic factors for carcinosarcoma are needed. Methods Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-8 (1975-2019) provided data for the epidemiological analysis. SEER-17 (2000-2019) provided data on the primary tumor sites, initial treatment, construction, and validation of the nomogram. Results The age-adjusted incidence per 100,000 persons of carcinosarcoma increased significantly from 0.46 to 0.91 [1975-2019; average annual percent change (AAPC): 1.3%, P = 0.006], with localized stage increasing from 0.14 to 0.26 [2005-2015; annual percent change (APC): 4.2%]. The 20-year limited-duration prevalence per 100,000 increased from 0.47 to 3.36 (1999-2018). The mortality per 100,000 increased significantly from 0.16 to 0.51 (1975-2019; AAPC: 1.9%, P < 0.001). The 5-year relative survival was 32.8%. The greatest number of carcinosarcomas were from the uterus (68.7%), ovary (17.8%), lung and bronchus (2.3%). The main treatment is comprehensive treatment based on surgery; however, surgery alone is preferred in older patients. In multivariate analysis (N = 11,424), age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, disease stage, tumor site, and treatment were associated with survival. A nomogram was established to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, and the C-indexes were 0.732 and 0.748 for the training and testing sets, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the nomogram provided a comprehensive and accurate prediction [1-year area under the curve (AUC): 0.782 vs. 0.796; 3-year AUC: 0.771 vs. 0.798; 5-year AUC: 0.777 vs. 0.810]. Conclusions In this study, the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of carcinosarcoma have increased over the past decades. There was a rapid rise in the incidence of localized stage in recent years, which reflected improved early detection. The prognosis of carcinosarcoma remains poor, signifying the urgency of exploring targeted cancer control treatments. Explicating distribution and gender disparities of carcinosarcoma may facilitate disease screening and medical surveillance. The nomogram demonstrated good predictive capacity and facilitated clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingjing Chen
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Parasitic Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiandong He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qiao Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, The 941st Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Xining, China
| | - Jia Zhang
- Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jiayi Peng
- Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Danni Wang
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Parasitic Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Kexin Tong
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Parasitic Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wenxiang Huang
- Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China,*Correspondence: Wenxiang Huang
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Management and Prognosis of Patients with Recurrent or Persistent/Progressive Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:7607-7623. [PMID: 36290878 PMCID: PMC9600185 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a highly aggressive gynecologic malignancy. Recurrent or persistent/progressive disease is usually fatal. We aimed to investigate the management and prognosis of these patients. Clinical records of UCS patients from June 1987 to April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The stage was re-assigned with the FIGO 2009 staging system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the independent predictors of survival after recurrence (SAR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Of the 168 patients, 98 experienced treatment failure. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 8.1 months (range: 0.0-89.1). The median follow-up time of censored patients was 32.0 months (range: 16.8-170.7). The 5-year SAR rates of those with recurrent or persistent/progressive disease were 7.6%. On multivariate analysis, salvage therapy mainly using radiotherapy (HR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.71) or chemotherapy (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.72) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.75) were associated with improved SAR, whereas disseminated recurrence was associated with significantly worse SAR (HR 3.94, 95% CI: 1.67-9.31, p = 0.002). Salvage therapy using radiotherapy or chemotherapy or CRT significantly improved SAR. Surgery significantly improved CSS but not SAR, adjusting for confounding factors.
Collapse
|
17
|
van der Horst RL, van der Hel O, Lutgens L, van der Aa M, Slangen B, Kruitwagen R, Lalisang RI. The role of multimodal adjuvant therapy for FIGO I-II carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 175:103701. [PMID: 35533817 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare entity with poor prognosis. Treatment of FIGO I-II UCS usually consists of surgery with or without adjuvant treatment. Due to the high metastatic potential, aggressive combined modality adjuvant treatment approaches, consisting of chemo- and radiotherapy, have been of interest. Our systematic review aims to compare survival, disease control and toxicity profiles in patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation to other adjuvant strategies (e.g.observation, chemotherapy or radiotherapy). A total of ten studies were included for a combined cohort size of 6,520 patients. Generally, the studies showed a trend towards improved disease control and survival in patients undergoing adjuvant multimodal treatment, although statistical significance was often not reached. Selection bias and non-randomized treatment allocation pose serious challenges to extrapolate these outcomes to clinical practice. We recommend additional prospective research on the role of adjuvant chemoradiation in FIGO I-II UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L van der Horst
- Division Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - O van der Hel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - L Lutgens
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M van der Aa
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - B Slangen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R Kruitwagen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R I Lalisang
- Division Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liao CI, Caesar MA, Lee D, Chan A, Darcy KM, Tian C, Kapp DS, Chan JK. Increasing incidence of uterine carcinosarcoma: A United States Cancer Statistics study. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 40:100936. [PMID: 35169605 PMCID: PMC8829560 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of uterine carcinosarcoma increased over the past 17 years. Black women in the South ages 70–74 had the highest incidence. Uterine carcinosarcoma increased annually by 2.6% in Hispanic women.
Collapse
|
19
|
Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Hensley ML, Huang HQ, Moore KN, Tewari KS, Copeland LJ, Secord AA, Mutch DG, Santin A, Warshal DP, Spirtos NM, DiSilvestro PA, Ioffe OB, Miller DS. Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:968-977. [PMID: 35007153 PMCID: PMC8937015 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase III randomized trial (NCT00954174) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test. RESULTS The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; P < .01 for noninferiority, P > .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; P = < 0.01 for noninferiority, P < .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 v 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 v 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
- Matthew A. Powell, MD, The Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Mailstop 8064-37-905, St Louis, MO 63110; e-mail:
| | - Virginia L. Filiaci
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Helen Q. Huang
- NRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Kathleen N. Moore
- The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | | | | | | | - Alessandro Santin
- Yale University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | - Olga B. Ioffe
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roque DR, Matei D. Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Uterine Carcinosarcoma: A Path to Inclusion. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:924-926. [PMID: 35044808 PMCID: PMC8937007 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Carboplatin/paclitaxel is noninferior compared with ifosfamide/paclitaxel and less toxic and should become the preferred regimen for upfront treatment of uterine carcinosarcoma.![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario R. Roque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Daniela Matei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Daniela Matei, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E Superior St, Lurie 4-107, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Romeo C, Le Saux O, Jacobs M, Joly F, Ferron G, Favier L, Fumet JD, Isambert N, Colombo PE, Sabatier R, Bastide L, Charreton A, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Gertych W, Dubot C, Bello Roufai D, Bataillon G, Berton D, Kalbacher E, Pautier P, Pomel C, Cornou C, Treilleux I, Lardy-Cleaud A, Ray-Coquard I. Therapeutic Challenges in Patients with Gynecologic Carcinosarcomas: Analysis of a Multicenter National Cohort Study from the French Prospective TMRG Network. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:354. [PMID: 35053517 PMCID: PMC8773830 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gynecological carcinosarcomas are rare and aggressive diseases, with a poor prognosis. The rarity of these tumors explains the lack of robust and specific data available in the literature. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of initial adjuvant treatment and recurrent therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicentric cohort study within the French national prospective Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) network was conducted. Data from all included carcinosarcomas diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively collected. RESULTS 425 cases of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (n = 313 and n = 112, respectively) were collected and analyzed from 12 participating centers. At diagnosis, 140 patients (48%) had a FIGO stage III-IV uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and 88 patients (83%) had an advanced ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) (FIGO stage ≥ III). Two hundred sixty-seven patients (63%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, most preferably carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen (n = 227, 86%). After a median follow-up of 47.4 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 15.1 months (95% CI 12.3-20.6) and 14.8 months (95% CI 13.1-17.1) for OCS and UCS, respectively. The median overall survival for OCS and UCS was 37.1 months (95% CI 22.2-49.2) and 30.6 months (95% CI 24.1-40.9), respectively. With adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, mPFS was 41.0 months (95% CI 17.0-NR) and 18.9 months (95% CI 14.0-45.6) for UCS stages I-II and stages III-IV, respectively. In the early stage UCS subgroup (i.e., stage IA, n = 86, 30%), mPFS for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24) was not reached (95% CI 22.2-NR), while mPFS for untreated patients (n = 62) was 19.9 months (95% IC 13.9-72.9) (HR 0.44 (0.20-0.95) p = 0.03). At the first relapse, median PFS for all patients was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.5-5.3). In the first relapse, mPFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.5) and 2.2 months (95% CI 1.9-2.9) with a combination of chemotherapy or monotherapy, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Interestingly, this vast prospective cohort of gynecological carcinosarcoma patients from the French national Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors network (i) highlights the positive impact of adjuvant CT on survival in all localized stages (including FIGO IA uterine carcinosarcomas), (ii) confirms the importance of platinum-based combination as an option for relapse setting, and (iii) reports median PFS for various therapeutic strategies in the relapse setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Romeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
| | - Olivia Le Saux
- Cancer Research Center of Lyon CRCL, UMR Inserm 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Margaux Jacobs
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.J.); (F.J.)
| | - Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.J.); (F.J.)
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
| | - Gwenael Ferron
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Favier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Surgical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France;
| | - Ludovic Bastide
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France;
| | - Amandine Charreton
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
| | - Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France
| | - Witold Gertych
- Gynaecologic Surgery Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France;
| | - Coraline Dubot
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, 92210 Paris, France;
| | - Diana Bello Roufai
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, 92210 Paris, France;
| | - Guillaume Bataillon
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 Saint Herblain, France
| | - Elsa Kalbacher
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, CHRU de Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
| | - Patricia Pautier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Pomel
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Caroline Cornou
- Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Isabelle Treilleux
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
da Silva JL, de Albuquerque LZ, Rodrigues FR, de Mesquita GG, Chaves CBP, Bonamino MH, de Melo AC. The prevalence and prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in uterine carcinosarcoma. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1306. [PMID: 34876047 PMCID: PMC8650400 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09026-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the prevalence and prognostic role of tumor microenvironment (TME) markers in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) through immunohistochemical characterization. METHODS The internal database of our institution was queried out for women with UCS who underwent surgery and thereafter postoperative chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel between January 2012 and December 2017. Tissue microarrays containing surgical samples of UCS from 57 women were assessed by immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2. RESULTS The mean age was 65.3 years (range, 49 to 79 years). For the epithelial component (E), CD3_E and CD4_E were highly expressed in 38 (66.7%) and in 40 (70.1%) patients, respectively, and were significantly associated with more advanced stages (p = 0.038 and p = 0.025, respectively). CD8_E was highly expressed in 42 (73.7%) patients, FOXP3_E 16 (28.1%), PD-1_E 35 (61.4%), PD-L1_E 27 (47.4%) and PD-L2_E 39 (68.4%). For the sarcomatous component (S), the prevalence of high expression was: CD3_S 6 (10.5%), CD4_S 20 (35.1%), CD8_S 44 (77.2%), FOXP3_S 8 (14%), PD-1_S 14 (24.6%), PD-L1_S 14 (24.6%) and PD-L2_S 8 (14%). By multivariate analysis, the CD8/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.026), CD4_E (p = 0.010), PD-L1_E (p = 0.013) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.008) markers significantly influenced progression-free survival. CD4/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.043), PD-1_E (p = 0.011), PD-L1_E (p = 0.036) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.028) had a significant association with overall survival. CONCLUSION Some differences in UCS clinical outcomes may be due to the subtype of TILs and PD-1/PD-L1 axis immune checkpoint signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Lopes da Silva
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Lucas Zanetti de Albuquerque
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Guilherme Gomes de Mesquita
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Division of Pathology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Bessa Pereira Chaves
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Martín Hernán Bonamino
- Immunology and Tumor Biology Program, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Vice-Presidency of Research and Biological Collections (VPPCB), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Andreia Cristina de Melo
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang M, Hui P. A Timely Update of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Classification in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Endometrial Carcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:1367-1378. [PMID: 34673912 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0098-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and has been traditionally classified based on histology. However, the distinction of certain histologic subtypes based on morphology is not uncommonly problematic, and as such, immunohistochemical study is often needed. Advances in comprehensive tumor sequencing have provided novel molecular profiles of endometrial carcinomas. Four distinct molecular subtypes with different prognostic values have been proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas program: polymerase epsilon ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy number low (microsatellite stable or no specific molecular profile), and copy number high (serouslike, p53 mutant). OBJECTIVE.— To discuss the utilities of commonly used immunohistochemical markers for the classification of endometrial carcinomas and to review the recent advancements of The Cancer Genome Atlas molecular reclassification and their potential impact on treatment strategies. DATA SOURCES.— Literature review and authors' personal practice experience. CONCLUSIONS.— The current practice of classifying endometrial cancers is predominantly based on morphology. The use of ancillary testing, including immunohistochemistry, is helpful in the identification, differential diagnosis, and classification of these cancers. New developments such as molecular subtyping have provided insightful prognostic values for endometrial carcinomas. The proposed The Cancer Genome Atlas classification is poised to gain further prominence in guiding the prognostic evaluation for tailored treatment strategies in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minhua Wang
- From the Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Pei Hui
- From the Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Salman L, Brudner Y, Silverman BG, Hallak M, Bruchim I. Increased incidence with improved survival of gynecologic carcinosarcoma: A population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 266:106-110. [PMID: 34624737 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate trends in the incidence and survival of gynecologic carcinosarcoma over the last 35 years and to explore ethnic disparities. STUDY DESIGN Using the Israeli National Cancer Registry database, all cases of gynecologic carcinosarcoma were included (1980-2014). Age at diagnosis, patient's ethnicity and anatomical site were extracted. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) were calculated for 3 time periods (1980-1994, 1995-2004 and 2005-2014). Relative survival was calculated using the Pohar-Perme method. RESULTS Overall, 935 cases of gynecologic carcinosarcomas were diagnosed during 1980-2014. The most common gynecologic anatomical site was the uterus (83.4%). Most cases (66%) were diagnosed at ages 60-80, with median age of 69 years. There was a steady increase in ASRs from 5.6 to 8.2 per million women. Throughout 1980-1994 and 2005-2014, ASRs were significantly higher in the Jewish compared to the Arab population (5.8 vs. 3.1, p = 0.02 and 8.5 vs. 5.2, p = 0.002, respectively). Relative survival rates increased throughout the study period. No significant differences were noted in relative survival between the Jewish and Arab populations (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION The incidence of gynecologic carcinosarcoma increased significantly from 1980 through 2014. Nevertheless, survival rates increased during this time, with no difference in survival between the Jewish and Arab populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Salman
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Yana Brudner
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Barbara G Silverman
- Israel National Cancer Registry, Israel Ministry of Health, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mordechai Hallak
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ilan Bruchim
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kotoku R, Yanazume S, Kuroda T, Kobayashi Y, Kitazono I, Akahane T, Tanimoto A, Kobayashi H. Two Components of Variant Profiles in Primary Vaginal Carcinosarcoma via Next-Generation Sequencing and a Literature Review. Int J Surg Pathol 2021; 30:288-294. [PMID: 34463147 DOI: 10.1177/10668969211037915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Primary vaginal carcinosarcoma (VCS) is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor consisting of admixed malignant epithelial and mesenchymal elements. We report a case of VCS that was subjected to analysis by immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing (NGS). A 53-year-old woman with post-menopausal vaginal bleeding underwent surgical excision followed by concurrent chemoradiation. A well demarcated tumor was growing in a discontinuous fashion at a location some distance from both the cervix and vulva. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of adenocarcinoma components and sarcoma components consisting of a sheet-like growth of spindle-shaped cells, and we diagnosed this tumor as primary vaginal carcinosarcoma. NGS analysis of each component identified the following variants, TP53, PIK3CA, KRAS and FBXW7. A comparison of microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) showed that within both tissues the sarcomatous components had a higher MSI and TMB than the carcinomatous components. This case supports "a monoclonal theory" with the genome profile being similar to other malignant mixed Müllerian tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakan Kotoku
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan
| | - Shintaro Yanazume
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan
| | - Takafumi Kuroda
- Course of Advanced Cancer Medicine for Gynecologic Cancer, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Nishi-Shinbashi 3-25-8, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Ikumi Kitazono
- Department of Pathology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan.,Center for Human Genome and Gene Analysis, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Akahane
- Department of Pathology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan.,Center for Human Genome and Gene Analysis, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan
| | - Akihide Tanimoto
- Department of Pathology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan.,Center for Human Genome and Gene Analysis, Kagoshima University Hospital, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8544, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.,Course of Advanced Cancer Medicine for Gynecologic Cancer, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Beckmann K, Selva-Nayagam S, Olver I, Miller C, Buckley ES, Powell K, Buranyi-Trevarton D, Gowda R, Roder D, Oehler MK. Carcinosarcomas of the Uterus: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Adjuvant Treatment. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:4633-4645. [PMID: 34140809 PMCID: PMC8203298 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s309551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uncertainties remain about the most effective treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), a rare but aggressive uterine cancer, due to the limited scope for randomized trials. This study investigates whether nodal excision or adjuvant therapies after hysterectomy offer a survival benefit, using multi-institutional clinical registry data from South Australia. Methods Data for all consecutive cases of UCS from 1980 to 2019 were extracted from the Clinical Cancer Registry. Clinical and treatment-related factors associated with disease-specific mortality (DSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) were determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with subgroup analyses by stage. Results Median follow-up for the 140 eligible cases was 21 months. 94% underwent hysterectomy, and 72% had an additional pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Furthermore, 16% received adjuvant chemotherapy; 11% adjuvant radiotherapy and 16% multimodal chemoradiotherapy, with an increase in the latter two modalities over time. DSM was reduced among those who underwent PLND (HR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.23–0.74), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18–0.84) or multimodality treatment (HR: 0.11; 95%CI: 0.06–0.30) compared with hysterectomy alone for the whole cohort and for late stage disease (FIGO III/IV) but not for earlier stage disease, except for reduced DSM with multimodal therapy. Findings were similar for ACM. Conclusion Our findings indicate better survival among those who received PLND, chemotherapy and multimodal adjuvant therapy, with the latter applying to early and late stage disease. However, cautious interpretation is warranted, due to potential “indication bias” and limited power. Further research into effective treatment modalities, ideally using prospective study designs, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Ian Olver
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Caroline Miller
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Elizabeth S Buckley
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kate Powell
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Raghu Gowda
- Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Martin K Oehler
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Uterine carcinosarcoma: An overview. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 163:103369. [PMID: 34051304 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor, is a rare gynecological malignancy characterized by poor prognosis. This "biphasic" neoplasm presents an admixture of epithelial and mesenchymal/sarcomatoid tumor cells which partially share their molecular signature and exhibit a typical epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition gene expression profile. Due to the rarity of this cancer, at present there is a scarcity of specific treatment guidelines. Surgical resection remains the best curative option for localized disease, whereas the addition of peri-operative radiotherapy, chemotherapy and chemoradiation has been shown to further improve disease outcomes. In the metastatic setting, palliative chemotherapy is currently the treatment of choice, although no consensus exists about the best regimen to be delivered. Besides standard treatment options for the advanced disease, mechanistic insights into UCS pathogenesis and identification of its histopathological and molecular features boosted the development of novel, and potentially more effective, therapeutic agents, that will be here discussed.
Collapse
|
28
|
Toboni MD, Crane EK, Brown J, Shushkevich A, Chiang S, Slomovitz BM, Levine DA, Dowdy SC, Klopp A, Powell MA, Thaker PH. Uterine carcinosarcomas: From pathology to practice. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:235-241. [PMID: 34030871 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare but aggressive cancer. In early-stage disease data guiding treatment is sparse. The purpose of this review is to summarize the findings from the 2019 NRG oncology group summer symposium meeting as well as a review of the current literature, with a particular focus on molecular targets, ongoing clinical trials, and treatment of early and advanced/recurrent disease. METHODS A combination of expert presentations and an extensive literature search was undertaken to summarize the literature in this review. MEDLINE was queried for peer-reviewed publications on UCS. This search was not limited by year or study design, but was limited to English language publications. ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for ongoing trials in UCS. RESULTS UCS is a rare cancer that is biphasic, with the carcinomatous component driving its aggressive nature. Level 3 evidence regarding early stage disease is lacking, but retrospective data suggests adjuvant therapy is warranted. The recent results of GOG 261 have contributed valuable information towards treatment strategy, including use of paclitaxel and carboplatin for UCS. Clinical trials are ongoing to investigate new targeted agents in UCS. CONCLUSION Ongoing endometrial cancer clinical trials now include UCS patients. In combination with advances in molecular profiling, this will provide patients with UCS improved therapeutic options. Until that time, surgical resection and traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy remains standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Toboni
- Washington University School of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, United States.
| | - Erin K Crane
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Jubilee Brown
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | | | - Sarah Chiang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Douglas A Levine
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Ann Klopp
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Washington University School of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Berger AA, Dao F, Levine DA. Angiogenesis in endometrial carcinoma: Therapies and biomarkers, current options, and future perspectives. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:844-850. [PMID: 33375990 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most prevalent cancer in women in the modern world. Despite a relatively high chance of surgical cure, for patients with advanced or recurrent disease there are few therapeutic options. Angiogenesis has been extensively studied ever since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was discovered in the 1980s. Several clinical trials of anti-angiogenic therapy in endometrial carcinoma have been conducted, with mixed results, and many researchers have tried to determine prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers. Recent trials, which shed new light on possible treatment biomarkers and efficacious combination therapies, are reviewed in this text. While we are still far from effectively tailoring anti-angiogenic treatment to each patient, these data have provided valuable insight and have put us on track for the discovery of novel opportunities for angiogenesis therapy in endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amnon A Berger
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Fanny Dao
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Corrado G, Ciccarone F, Cosentino F, Legge F, Rosati A, Arcieri M, Turco LC, Certelli C, Federico A, Vizza E, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Role of minimally invasive surgery versus open approach in patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcomas: a retrospective multicentric study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:845-852. [PMID: 32880752 PMCID: PMC7873090 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03372-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to compare surgical and survival outcome in only patients with early-stage UCSs managed by laparotomic surgery (LPT) versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Methods Data were retrospectively collected in four Italian different institutions. Inclusion criteria were UCS diagnosis confirmed by the definitive histological examination, and stage I or II according to the FIGO staging system. Results Between August 2000 and March 2019, the data relative to 170 patients bearing UCSs were collected: of these, 95 were defined as early-stage disease (stage I–II) based on the histological report at the primary surgery, and thus were included in this study. Forty-four patients were managed by LPT, and 51 patients were managed by MIS. The operative time was lower in the MIS group versus the LPT group (p value 0.021); the median estimated blood loss was less in the MIS group compared to the median of LPT group (p value < 0.0001). The length of hospital stay days was shorter in the MIS patients (p value < 0.0001). Overall, there were eight (8.4%) post-operative complications; of these, seven were recorded in the LPT group versus one in the MIS group (p value 0.023). There was no difference in the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Conclusion There was no difference of oncologic outcome between the two approaches, in face of a more favourable peri-operative and post-operative profile in the MIS group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Corrado
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cosentino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise Spa, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Legge
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Rosati
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Arcieri
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Carlo Turco
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise Spa, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Department Gynecology and Breast Care Unit, Mater Olbia Spa, Olbia, Italy
| | - Camilla Certelli
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alex Federico
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rojas C, Tian C, Powell MA, Chan JK, Bateman NW, Conrads TP, Rocconi RP, Jones NL, Shriver CD, Hamilton CA, Maxwell GL, Casablanca Y, Darcy KM. Racial disparities in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma: A population-based analysis of treatment and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:67-77. [PMID: 32029291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate racial disparities in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities. METHODS Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS or OCS between 2004 and 2014 were eligible. Differences by disease site or race were compared using Chi-square test and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS There were 2830 NHBs and 7366 NHWs with UCS, and 280 NHBs and 2586 NHWs with OCS. Diagnosis of UCS was more common in NHBs (11.5%) vs. NHWs (3.7%) and increased with age (P < .0001). OCS diagnosis remained <5% in both races and all ages. NHBs with UCS or OCS were more common in the South and more likely to have a comorbidity score ≥ 1, low neighborhood income and Medicaid or no insurance (P < .0001). Diagnosis at stage II-IV was more common in NHBs than NHWs with UCS but not OCS. NHBs with both UCS and OCS were less likely to undergo surgery and to achieve no gross residual disease with surgery (P = .002). Risk of death in NHB vs. NHW patients with UCS was 1.38 after adjustment for demographic factors and dropped after sequential adjustment for comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, stage and treatment by 4%, 16%, 7%, 19% and 10%, respectively, leaving 43.5% of the racial disparity in survival unexplained. In contrast, risk of death in NHBs vs. NHWs with OCS was 1.19 after adjustment for demographic factors and became insignificant after adjustment for comorbidity. Race was an independent prognostic factor in UCS but not in OCS. CONCLUSIONS Racial disparities exist in characteristics, treatment and survival in UCS and OCS with distinctions that merit additional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Rojas
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
| | - Nathaniel L Jones
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
| | - Craig D Shriver
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Center for Personalized Health, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Center for Personalized Health, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kucukgoz Gulec U, Kilic Bagir E, Paydas S, Guzel AB, Gumurdulu D, Vardar MA. Prognostic significance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in uterine carcinosarcoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 244:51-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
33
|
Ross MS, Chandler CK, Matsuo K, Vargo JA, Elishaev E, Siripong N, Berger JL, Kelley JL, Taylor SE. Cancer antigen 125 is associated with disease status in uterine carcinosarcoma. Rare Tumors 2019; 11:2036361319884159. [PMID: 31741727 PMCID: PMC6843728 DOI: 10.1177/2036361319884159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive tumor with poor outcomes. Cancer antigen 125 is routinely used to track the disease course of ovarian cancer and has been suggested as a biomarker in other aggressive forms of uterine cancer. We sought to characterize cancer antigen 125 as a potential biomarker of disease status in uterine carcinosarcoma. Clinical and pathological data were abstracted for patients who had surgical staging for a pathologically confirmed uterine carcinosarcoma at our institution from January 2000 to March 2014. Non-parametric tests were used to compare changes in cancer antigen 125. Elevated cancer antigen 125 (>35 U/mL) as a predictor of survival was assessed via Kaplan–Meier curves. Among the 153 patients identified, 66 patients had at least one paired measure of cancer antigen 125 drawn preoperatively, post-treatment, or at the time of disease recurrence, and 19 patients had cancer antigen–125 levels at all three time points. Analysis of the 51 patients with both preoperative and post-treatment values found a significant drop in cancer antigen 125 (p < 0.001). Among the 30 patients who had end-of-treatment and recurrence levels, a significant increase was noted (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in cancer antigen–125 levels preoperatively compared to at recurrence among the 23 patients with levels at both time-points (p = 0.99). Elevated preoperative cancer antigen 125 was not associated with overall survival (p = 0.12); elevated post-treatment cancer antigen 125 was associated with a worse overall survival (p < 0.001). Based on this dataset, there seems to be utility in trending a cancer antigen–125 level in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma. A cancer antigen–125 level could predict recurrence and provide prognostic information regarding survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm Strachan Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Austin Vargo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nalyn Siripong
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jessica Layne Berger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Leo Kelley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Elizabeth Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leskela S, Pérez-Mies B, Rosa-Rosa JM, Cristobal E, Biscuola M, Palacios-Berraquero ML, Ong S, Matias-Guiu Guia X, Palacios J. Molecular Basis of Tumor Heterogeneity in Endometrial Carcinosarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11070964. [PMID: 31324031 PMCID: PMC6678708 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinosarcoma (ECS) represents one of the most extreme examples of tumor heterogeneity among human cancers. ECS is a clinically aggressive, high-grade, metaplastic carcinoma. At the morphological level, intratumor heterogeneity in ECS is due to an admixture of epithelial (carcinoma) and mesenchymal (sarcoma) components that can include heterologous tissues, such as skeletal muscle, cartilage, or bone. Most ECSs belong to the copy-number high serous-like molecular subtype of endometrial carcinoma, characterized by the TP53 mutation and the frequently accompanied by a large number of gene copy-number alterations, including the amplification of important oncogenes, such as CCNE1 and c-MYC. However, a proportion of cases (20%) probably represent the progression of tumors initially belonging to the copy-number low endometrioid-like molecular subtype (characterized by mutations in genes such as PTEN, PI3KCA, or ARID1A), after the acquisition of the TP53 mutations. Only a few ECS belong to the microsatellite-unstable hypermutated molecular type and the POLE-mutated, ultramutated molecular type. A common characteristic of all ECSs is the modulation of genes involved in the epithelial to mesenchymal process. Thus, the acquisition of a mesenchymal phenotype is associated with a switch from E- to N-cadherin, the up-regulation of transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin, such as Snail Family Transcriptional Repressor 1 and 2 (SNAI1 and SNAI2), Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox 1 and 2 (ZEB1 and ZEB2), and the down-regulation, among others, of members of the miR-200 family involved in the maintenance of an epithelial phenotype. Subsequent differentiation to different types of mesenchymal tissues increases tumor heterogeneity and probably modulates clinical behavior and therapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Leskela
- Department of Pathology, Institute Ramón y Cajal for Health Research, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
| | - Belen Pérez-Mies
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Rosa-Rosa
- Department of Pathology, Institute Ramón y Cajal for Health Research, 28034 Madrid, Spain
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Eva Cristobal
- Department of Pathology, Institute Ramón y Cajal for Health Research, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Michele Biscuola
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), 41013 Seville, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain
| | | | - SuFey Ong
- NanoString Technologies, Inc, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu Guia
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
- IRBLLEIDA, IDIBELL, University of Lleida, 25003 Lleida, Spain
| | - José Palacios
- Department of Pathology, Institute Ramón y Cajal for Health Research, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
- CIBER-ONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá de Henares, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Matsuo K, Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, Mikami M, Enomoto T, Roman LD, Wright JD. Trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumor size >2 cm: trends and characteristics in the United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 29:e85. [PMID: 30207094 PMCID: PMC6189433 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Revised: 07/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Rachel S Mandelbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Yunokawa M, Johnson MS, Machida H, Omatsu K, Klobocista MM, Im DD, Satoh S, Baba T, Ikeda Y, Bush SH, Hasegawa K, Blake EA, Takekuma M, Shida M, Nishimura M, Adachi S, Pejovic T, Takeuchi S, Yokoyama T, Ueda Y, Iwasaki K, Miyake TM, Yanai S, Nagano T, Takano T, Shahzad MM, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Roman LD. Tumor characteristics and outcome of uterine carcinosarcoma in women aged ≥80 years. Surg Oncol 2019; 29:25-32. [PMID: 31196490 PMCID: PMC7523232 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine clinico-pathological characteristics and outcomes of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) in women aged ≥80 years. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a previous multicenter retrospective study examining 906 women with stage I-IV UCS who underwent primary hysterectomy. Patient demographics, treatment types, tumor characteristics, and survival were examined across aged ≥80 (n = 82 [9.1%]), aged 60-79, (n = 526 [58.1%]), and aged <60 (n = 298 [32.9%]). RESULTS Women in the aged ≥80 group were more likely to be Caucasian, undergo simple hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy, and receive no postoperative therapy (all, P < 0.05). Tumors in the aged ≥80 group were more likely to have high-grade carcinoma, heterologous sarcoma, and sarcoma dominance but less likely to have lympho-vascular space invasion (all, P < 0.05). Lymphadenectomy did not improve survival in the aged ≥80 group (P > 0.05), whereas lymphadenectomy was protective for survival in the younger groups (both, P < 0.05). Postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the aged ≥80 group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.89, P = 0.021). With chemotherapy treatment, women in the aged ≥80 group had PFS similar to those in the aged 60-79 group (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.51-1.83, P = 0.92). In contrast, without chemotherapy treatment, women in the aged ≥80 group had significantly decreased PFS compared to the aged 60-79 group (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.09-2.40, P = 0.016). Similar associations were observed for postoperative radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Nearly 10% of women with UCS are aged ≥80 that are characterized by aggressive tumor factors. Postoperative therapy but not extensive surgery may improve survival in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, CO, USA
| | | | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, OR, USA
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Mian Mk Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Matsuo K, Ross MS, Yunokawa M, Johnson MS, Machida H, Omatsu K, Klobocista MM, Im DD, Satoh S, Baba T, Ikeda Y, Bush SH, Hasegawa K, Blake EA, Takekuma M, Shida M, Nishimura M, Adachi S, Pejovic T, Takeuchi S, Yokoyama T, Ueda Y, Iwasaki K, Miyake TM, Yanai S, Nagano T, Takano T, Shahzad MM, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Roman LD. Clinical utility of CA-125 in the management of uterine carcinosarcoma. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 29:e88. [PMID: 30207096 PMCID: PMC6189428 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- The Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Mian Mk Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Matsuo K, Mandelbaum RS, Adams CL, Roman LD, Wright JD. Performance and outcome of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: A population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:368-375. [PMID: 30792003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine changes in performance and outcomes of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS This is a population-based retrospective study examining the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2001 and 2015. Women with cervical, uterine, vaginal, and vulvar malignancies who underwent pelvic exenteration were examined. Comorbidity, perioperative complications, total charges, length of stay, and mortality were assessed. RESULTS There were 2647 cases included. Cervical cancer was the most common malignancy (45.1%), followed by vaginal cancer (27.6%). 26.9% of women had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3, which significantly increased from 23.3% in 2001-2005 to 33.3% in 2011-2015 (42.9% relative increase, P < 0.001). Obese women undergoing exenteration increased significantly from 4.5% in 2001-2005 to 19.4% in 2011-2015 (3.3-fold relative increase, P < 0.001). The perioperative complication rate was 68.1%, including 38.7% with multiple complications. The mortality rate was 1.9%. The number of women with multiple perioperative complications increased from 29.4% in 2001-2005 to 52.8% in 2011-2015 (78.6% relative increase, P < 0.001). More recent year of surgery, obesity, higher comorbidity, higher household income, surgery at large bedsize hospital, urinary diversion, vaginal reconstruction, and vulvar cancer were associated with an increased risk of multiple complications on multivariable analysis (all, P < 0.05). Median length of stay was 14 (IQR 9-21) days, and the number of women hospitalized ≥28 days significantly increased from 12.6% in 2001-2005 to 19.1% in 2011-2015 (51.6% relative increase, P < 0.001). The median corrected total charges increased from $121,854 to $185,100 between 2001 and 2015 (net difference +$63,246, 51.9% relative increase, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Women undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies became more obese and comorbid during the study period. Pelvic exenteration for women with gynecologic malignancies is associated with high morbidity and mortality as well as substantial treatment-related costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Rachel S Mandelbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Crystal L Adams
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Enomoto T, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Proposal for a Risk-Based Categorization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3676-3684. [PMID: 30105438 PMCID: PMC7521084 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6695-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a categorization model of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) based on tumor cell types (carcinoma and sarcoma) and sarcoma dominance. METHODS This secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study examined 889 cases of UCS with available histologic evaluation. Based on survival outcome, cases were clustered into three groups: low-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type A, n = 96 (10.8%)], (1) low-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance and (2) high-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type B, n = 412 (46.3%)], and high-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance [type C, n = 381 (42.9%)]. Tumor characteristics and outcome were examined based on the categorization. RESULTS Women in type C category were more likely to be older, obese, and Caucasian, whereas those in type A category were younger, less obese, Asian, and nulligravid (all P < 0.01). Type C tumors were more likely to have metastatic implants, large tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion with sarcoma cells, and higher lymph node ratio, whereas type A tumors were more likely to be early-stage disease and small (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, tumor categorization was independently associated with progression-free survival (5-year rates: 70.1% for type A, 48.3% for type B, and 35.9% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01) and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 82.8% for type A, 63.0% for type B, and 47.1% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Characteristic differences in clinicopathological factors and outcomes in UCS imply that different underlying etiologies and biological behaviors may be present, supporting a new classification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Matsuo K, Machida H, Mandelbaum RS, Konishi I, Mikami M. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 152:87-93. [PMID: 30389105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer, with a particular focus on stage IB and stage III disease. METHODS Two retrospective cohort studies were conducted using The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program between 1988 and 2014. The stage IB cohort consisted of node-negative FIGO stage IB1 (tumor size <2 cm), IB2 (2-3.9 cm), and IB3 (≥4 cm) cervical cancer. The stage III cohort consisted of FIGO stage IIIA, IIIB, and stage IIIC1 (any pelvic nodal metastasis) cervical cancer. Multivariable analysis was performed for cause-specific survival based on cancer stage. RESULTS In the stage IB cohort (n = 8909), stage IB1 tumors were more likely to be adenocarcinoma and low-grade compared to other the groups (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, stage IB2 disease was independently associated with a nearly two-fold increased risk of cervical cancer mortality compared to stage IB1 disease (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-2.41, P < 0.001). In the stage III cohort (n = 11,733), stage IIIC1 was independently associated with improved cause-specific survival compared to stage IIIB disease (adjusted-HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.74-0.85, P < 0.001). Survival of stage IIIC1 disease significantly differed based on T = stage, (5-year rates: 74.8% for T1, 58.7% for T2, and 39.3% for T3) with a 35.3% difference in absolute survival (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer is useful to distinguish survival groups; stage IB1 and stage IB2 disease have distinct characteristics and survival outcomes, while survival in stage IIIC1 varies depending on local tumor factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Rachel S Mandelbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ikuo Konishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Characterizing sarcoma dominance pattern in uterine carcinosarcoma: Homologous versus heterologous element. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:433-440. [PMID: 30217299 PMCID: PMC7526039 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine significance of sarcoma dominance (SD) patterns in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS This is a secondary analysis of multicenter retrospective study examining women with stages I-IV UCS who underwent primary surgery. SD was defined as >50% of sarcoma component in uterine tumor. SD patterns were grouped as homologous sarcoma without SD (homo/non-dominance, n = 351), heterologous sarcoma without SD (hetero/non-dominance, n = 174), homologous sarcoma with SD (homo/dominance, n = 175), and heterologous sarcoma with SD (hetero/dominance, n = 189), and correlated to tumor characteristics and survival. RESULTS SD patterns were significantly associated with age, body habitus, carcinoma type, tumor size, depth of myometrial invasion, and nodal metastasis (all, P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, SD was associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) in homologous cases (both, P < 0.05) but not in heterologous cases. On multivariate models, both homologous and heterologous SD patterns remained independent prognostic factors for decreased PFS (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] ranges: homo/dominance 1.35-1.69, and hetero/dominance 1.47-1.64) and CSS (adjusted-HR ranges: 1.52-1.84 and 1.66-1.81, respectively) compared to homo/non-dominance (all, P < 0.05). Among stage I-III disease, when tumors had SD, adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved PFS (adjusted-HR: homo/dominance 0.49, and hetero/dominance 0.45) and CSS (0.36 and 0.31, respectively) compared to chemotherapy alone (all, P < 0.05); contrary, this association was not observed with absence of SD (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION In UCS, SD impacts survival in homologous but not in heterologous type. Regardless of sarcoma types, SD was associated with decreased survival in UCS; adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be an effective postoperative strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, USA; Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Remmerie M, Janssens V. Targeted Therapies in Type II Endometrial Cancers: Too Little, but Not Too Late. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:E2380. [PMID: 30104481 PMCID: PMC6121653 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Type II endometrial carcinomas (ECs) are responsible for most endometrial cancer-related deaths due to their aggressive nature, late stage detection and high tolerance for standard therapies. However, there are no targeted therapies for type II ECs, and they are still treated the same way as the clinically indolent and easily treatable type I ECs. Therefore, type II ECs are in need of new treatment options. More recently, molecular analysis of endometrial cancer revealed phosphorylation-dependent oncogenic signalling in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways to be most frequently altered in type II ECs. Consequently, clinical trials tested pharmacologic kinase inhibitors targeting these pathways, although mostly with rather disappointing results. In this review, we highlight the most common genetic alterations in type II ECs. Additionally, we reason why most clinical trials for ECs using targeted kinase inhibitors had unsatisfying results and what should be changed in future clinical trial setups. Furthermore, we argue that, besides kinases, phosphatases should no longer be ignored in clinical trials, particularly in type II ECs, where the tumour suppressive phosphatase protein phosphatase type 2A (PP2A) is frequently mutated. Lastly, we discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting PP2A for (re)activation, possibly in combination with pharmacologic kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel Remmerie
- Laboratory of Protein Phosphorylation & Proteomics, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
- Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Veerle Janssens
- Laboratory of Protein Phosphorylation & Proteomics, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
- Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Enomoto T, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Significance of Lymphovascular Space Invasion by the Sarcomatous Component in Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2756-2766. [PMID: 29971677 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6547-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) with a sarcomatous component on the tumor characteristics and clinical outcomes of women with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study that examined women with stage I-IV UCS who underwent primary hysterectomy. Archived histopathology slides were reviewed and LVSI was scored as follows: LVSI with a carcinomatous component alone (LVSI-carcinoma; n = 375, 76.8%) or LVSI containing a sarcomatous component with or without a carcinomatous component (LVSI-sarcoma; n = 113, 23.2%). Qualitative metrics of LVSI were correlated to clinicopathological factors and survival outcome. RESULTS Tumors in the LVSI-sarcoma group were more likely to have sarcoma dominance (82.1 vs. 26.4%) heterologous sarcomatous component (51.3 vs. 37.9%), low-grade carcinoma (42.5 vs. 22.4%), and large tumor size (81.0 vs. 70.2%) in the primary tumor site compared with tumors in the LVSI-carcinoma group (all p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, LVSI-sarcoma was independently associated with decreased progression-free survival (5-year rates: 34.9 vs. 40.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-2.50, p < 0.001), and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 41.8 vs. 55.9%, adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.39-2.75, p < 0.001) compared with LVSI-carcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-sarcoma had a higher reduction rate of recurrence/progression of disease (54% reduction, p = 0.04) compared with postoperative radiotherapy for women with LVSI-carcinoma (26% reduction, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION In UCS, the presence of a sarcomatous component in LVSI is particularly prevalent when a tumor has sarcoma dominance. Our study suggests that LVSI containing a sarcomatous component may be a predictor of decreased survival for women with UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Matsuo K, Machida H, Mariani A, Mandelbaum RS, Glaser GE, Gostout BS, Roman LD, Wright JD. Adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy and survival of women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2018; 29:e69. [PMID: 30022633 PMCID: PMC6078885 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the trends and survival for women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent adequate lymphadenectomy during surgical treatment. METHODS This is a retrospective observational study examining the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results program between 1988 and 2013. We evaluated 21,537 cases of stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer including serous (n=7,466), clear cell (n=6,903), mucinous (n=4,066), and endometrioid (n=3,102) histology. A time-trend analysis of the proportion of patients who underwent adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy (≥8 per Gynecologic Oncology Group [GOG] criteria, ≥12 per Collaborative Group Report [CGR] criteria for bladder cancer, and >22 per Mayo criteria for endometrial cancer) and a survival analysis associated with adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed. RESULTS There were significant increases in the proportion of women who underwent adequate lymphadenectomy: GOG criteria 3.6% to 28.6% (1988-2010); CGR criteria 2.4% to 22.4% (1988-2013); and Mayo criteria 0.7% to 9.5% (1988-2013) (all, p<0.05). On multivariable analysis, adequate lymphadenectomy was independently associated with improved cause-specific survival compared to inadequate lymphadenectomy: GOG criteria, adjusted-hazard ratio (HR)=0.75, CGR criteria, adjusted-HR=0.77, and Mayo criteria, adjusted-HR=0.85 (all, p<0.05). Compared to inadequate lymphadenectomy, adequate lymphadenectomy was significantly associated with improved cause-specific survival for serous (HR range=0.67-0.73), endometrioid (HR range=0.59-0.61), and clear cell types (HR range=0.66-0.73) (all, p<0.05) but not in mucinous type (HR range=0.80-0.91; p>0.05). CONCLUSION Quality of lymphadenectomy during the surgical treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer has significantly improved. Adequate lymphadenectomy is associated with a 15%-25% reduction in ovarian cancer mortality compared to inadequate lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rachel S Mandelbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gretchen E Glaser
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bobbie S Gostout
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|