Elucidation of genomic origin of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEO) by genomic and microsatellite analysis

Clinical application of FIGO 2023 staging system of endometrial cancer in a Chinese cohort

OBJECTIVE

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2023 staging system for endometrial cancer (EC) was released with incorporating histology, lympho-vascular space invasion, and molecular classification together. Our objective is to further explore the clinical utility and prognostic significance of the 2023 FIGO staging system in China.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for patients who received standard surgeries and underwent genetic testing using multigene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels between December 2018 and December 2023 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. The genomic and clinical data of all patients were analyzed, and stages were determined by both the 2009 and 2023 FIGO staging systems. Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 547 patients were enrolled in the study. After the restaged by the FIGO 2023 staging system, stage shifts occurred in 147/547 (26.9%) patients. In patients with early stages in FIGO 2009 (stage I-II), 63 cases were rearranged to IAmPOLEmut and 53 cases to IICmp53abn due to the molecular classification of POLEmut and p53abn. Altogether 345 cases were in stage I, 107 cases in stage II, 69 cases in stage III, and 26 cases in stage IV according to the FIGO 2023 staging criteria. For stage I diseases, the 3-year PFS rate was 92.7% and 95.3% in 2009 and 2023 FIGO staging systems, respectively. The 3-year PFS of stage II in 2023 FIGO was lower than that of FIGO 2009 (3-year PFS: 85.0% versus 90.9%), especially in substage IIC and IICmp53abn. Three cases (12%) of stage IIIA in FIGO 2009 were shifted to stage IA3 FIGO 2023, with 3-year PFS rates of 90.9% versus 100%, respectively. In NGS analysis, the most prevalent gene alterations were observed in PTEN and PIK3CA.

CONCLUSION

The FIGO 2023 staging system was proved to be a good predictor of survival for EC patients with enhanced precision compared to FIGO 2009. Predominant stage shifts were observed in early-stage diseases. Distinct gene alterations of different subtypes may help to explore more accurate target therapies.

Perceptions of Controversies and Unresolved Issues in the 2014 FIGO Staging System for Endometrial Cancer: Survey Results From Members of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists and International Gynecologic Cancer Society

Long-standing controversial and unresolved issues in the current "International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics" staging system for endometrial cancer are well-recognized by pathologists and clinicians alike and exist primarily as a result of limitations to the existing literature. To guide the design of future outcome-based studies specifically aimed at resolving such gaps, the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists developed a survey of the current perceptions of pathologists (n = 172) and clinicians (n= 135) from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists and from the International Gynecologic Cancer Society on areas for potential refinement of the current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. The highest priority issues for pathologists and clinicians alike were the need to determine whether stage IIIA patients (ovarian/fallopian tube involvement) can be reliably separated into favorable versus unfavorable outcome groups to avoid over-treatment of the former group and to determine whether stage IIIC patients (lymph node metastases) can be separated into favorable versus unfavorable outcome groups based on the size of lymph node metastases. The majority of pathologists and clinicians viewed lymphovascular space invasion as an independent prognostic variable and favored incorporating lymphovascular space invasion into staging, though the level of support did not meet the threshold of 75% in support that we used to define a formal consensus. While pathologists did agree on the prognostic value of reporting the extent of lymphovascular space invasion, there was no consensus on the diagnostic criteria to distinguish focal versus substantial involvement. The majority of pathologists and clinicians viewed that a universally accepted protocol for sentinel lymph node ultra-staging is lacking. Both survey groups conveyed a slight preference for incorporating tumor histotype and molecular classification into staging but the support was short of the 75% threshold for formal consensus. Collectively, this survey permits the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists to develop a pathologist and clinician-driven long-term strategy for prioritizing and designing outcome-based studies specifically targeted to resolving controversial and unresolved issues in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of endometrial cancer.

The research progress on synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma (SEOC) is the most common combination of primary double cancer in the female reproductive system. The etiology and pathogenesis of SEOC remain unclear, and clinically, it is often misdiagnosed as metastatic cancer, affecting the formulation of treatment plans and prognosis for patients. This article provides a review of its epidemiology, pathological and clinical characteristics, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.