Evidence for Gain Reduction by a Precursor in an On-Frequency Forward Masking Paradigm

The effects of broadband elicitor duration on a psychoacoustic measure of cochlear gain reduction

Physiological and psychoacoustic studies of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in humans have often relied on long duration elicitors (>100 ms). This is largely due to previous research using otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) that found multiple MOCR time constants, including time constants in the 100s of milliseconds, when elicited by broadband noise. However, the effect of the duration of a broadband noise elicitor on similar psychoacoustic tasks is currently unknown. The current study measured the effects of ipsilateral broadband noise elicitor duration on psychoacoustic gain reduction estimated from a forward-masking paradigm. Analysis showed that both masker type and elicitor duration were significant main effects, but no interaction was found. Gain reduction time constants were ∼46 ms for the masker present condition and ∼78 ms for the masker absent condition (ranging from ∼29 to 172 ms), both similar to the fast time constants reported in the OAE literature (70-100 ms). Maximum gain reduction was seen for elicitor durations of ∼200 ms. This is longer than the 50-ms duration which was found to produce maximum gain reduction with a tonal on-frequency elicitor. Future studies of gain reduction may use 150-200 ms broadband elicitors to maximally or near-maximally stimulate the MOCR.

Behavioral Measures of Cochlear Gain Reduction Depend on Precursor Frequency, Bandwidth, and Level

Sensory systems adjust to the environment to maintain sensitivity to change. In the auditory system, the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) is a known physiological mechanism capable of such adjustment. The MOCR provides efferent feedback between the brainstem and cochlea, reducing cochlear gain in response to sound. The perceptual effects of the MOCR are not well understood, such as how gain reduction depends on elicitor characteristics in human listeners. Physiological and behavioral data suggest that ipsilateral MOCR tuning is only slightly broader than it is for afferent fibers, and that the fibers feed back to the frequency region of the cochlea that stimulated them. However, some otoacoustic emission (OAE) data suggest that noise is a more effective elicitor than would be consistent with sharp tuning, and that a broad region of the cochlea may be involved in elicitation. If the elicitor is processed in a cochlear channel centered at the signal frequency, the growth of gain reduction with elicitor level would be expected to depend on the frequency content of the elicitor. In the current study, the effects of the frequency content and level of a preceding sound (called a precursor) on signal threshold was examined. The results show that signal threshold increased with increasing precursor level at a shallower slope for a tonal precursor at the signal frequency than for a tonal precursor nearly an octave below the signal frequency. A broadband noise was only slightly more effective than a tone at the signal frequency, with a relatively shallow slope similar to that of the tonal precursor at the signal frequency. Overall, these results suggest that the excitation at the signal cochlear place, regardless of elicitor frequency, determines the magnitude of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction, and that it increases with elicitor level.

The effect of broadband elicitor laterality on psychoacoustic gain reduction across signal frequency

There are psychoacoustic methods thought to measure gain reduction, which may be from the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR), a bilateral feedback loop that adjusts cochlear gain. Although studies have used ipsilateral and contralateral elicitors and have examined strength at different signal frequencies, these factors have not been examined within a single study. Therefore, basic questions about gain reduction, such as the relative strength of ipsilateral vs contralateral elicitation and the relative strength across signal frequency, are not known. In the current study, gain reduction from ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral elicitors was measured at 1-, 2-, and 4-kHz signal frequencies using forward masking paradigms at a range of elicitor levels in a repeated measures design. Ipsilateral and bilateral strengths were similar and significantly larger than contralateral strength across signal frequencies. Growth of gain reduction with precursor level tended to differ with signal frequency, although not significantly. Data from previous studies are considered in light of the results of this study. Behavioral results are also considered relative to anatomical and physiological data on the MOCR. These results indicate that, in humans, cochlear gain reduction is broad across frequencies and is robust for ipsilateral and bilateral elicitation but small for contralateral elicitation.

The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review

This review addresses the putative role of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans. A framework for interpreting psychophysical results in terms of the expected influence of the MOC reflex is introduced. This framework is used to review the effects of a precursor or contralateral acoustic stimulation on 1) simultaneous masking of brief tones, 2) behavioral estimates of cochlear gain and frequency resolution in forward masking, 3) the buildup and decay of forward masking, and 4) measures of intensity resolution. Support, or lack thereof, for a role of the MOC reflex in psychophysical perception is discussed in terms of studies on estimates of MOC strength from otoacoustic emissions and the effects of resection of the olivocochlear bundle in patients with vestibular neurectomy. Novel, innovative approaches are needed to resolve the dissatisfying conclusion that current results are unable to definitively confirm or refute the role of the MOC reflex in masking and intensity resolution.