2
|
Blum D, Koeberle D, Ribi K, Schmitz SFH, Utiger U, Klingbiel D, Strasser F. Electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes associated with cancer: methods of a randomized controlled trial SAKK 95/06 E-MOSAIC. BMC Palliat Care 2012; 11:19. [PMID: 23006802 PMCID: PMC3517324 DOI: 10.1186/1472-684x-11-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2012] [Accepted: 09/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with advanced, incurable cancer, anticancer treatment may be used to alleviate cancer-related symptoms, but monitoring of them in daily practice is rarely done. We aim to test the effectiveness of a real-time symptom and syndrome assessment using the E-MOSAIC software installed in handheld computer generating a longitudinal monitoring sheet (LoMoS) provided to the oncologists in a phase III setting. Methods In this prospective multicentre cluster randomized phase-III trial patients with any incurable solid tumor and having defined cancer related symptoms, who receive new outpatient chemotherapy in palliative intention (expected tumor-size response rate ≤20%) are eligible. Immediately before the weekly visit to oncologists, all patients complete with nurse assistance the E-MOSAIC Assessment: Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, ≤3 additional symptoms, estimated nutritional intake, body weight, Karnofsky and medications for pain and cachexia. Experienced oncologists will be randomized to receive the LoMoS or not. To minimize contamination, LoMoS are removed from the medical charts after visits. Primary endpoint is the difference in global quality of life (items 29 & 30 of EORTC-QlQ-C30) between baseline and last study visit at week 6, with a 10 point between-arm difference considered to be clinically relevant. 20 clusters (=oncologists) per treatment arm with 4–8 patients each are aimed for to achieve a significance level of 5% and a power of 80% in a mixed model approach. Selected co- variables are included in the model for adjustment. Secondary endpoints include patient-perceived patient-physician communication symptom burden over time, and oncologists’ symptom management performance (predefined thresholds of symptoms compared to oncologists’ pharmacological, diagnostic or counselling actions [structured chart review]). Discussion This trial will contribute to the research question, whether structured, longitudinal monitoring of patients’ multidimensional symptoms, indicators for symptom management, and clinical benefit outcomes can influence patients’ quality of life and symptom distress, in a setting of routine oncology practice. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials NCT00477919
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Blum
- Oncological Palliative Medicine, Section Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Palliative Care Centre, Cantonal Hospital St, Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, St, Gallen 9007, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Hazel GA, Pavlakis N, Goldstein D, Olver IN, Tapner MJ, Price D, Bower GD, Briggs GM, Rossleigh MA, Taylor DJ, George J. Treatment of Fluorouracil-Refractory Patients With Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer by Using Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres Plus Concomitant Systemic Irinotecan Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:4089-95. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.20.8116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Liver metastases are the principal cause of death in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Irinotecan is a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of CRC and has demonstrated synergistic potential when used with radiation. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres has demonstrated increased response and survival rates when given with fluorouracil chemotherapy. This study's goal was to evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose of concomitant irinotecan and radioembolization in fluorouracil-refractory patients with CRC hepatic metastases. Patients and Methods Twenty-five irinotecan-naïve patients who had experienced relapse after previous chemotherapy were enrolled onto three dose-escalating groups. Irinotecan was administered at 50, 75, or 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle for the first two cycles, and full irinotecan doses (ie, 100 mg/m2) were administered during cycles 3 to 9. Radioembolization was administered during the first chemotherapy cycle. Results Most patients experienced acute, self-limiting abdominal pain and nausea. Mild lethargy and anorexia were common. Grades 3 to 4 events were seen in three of six patients at 50 mg/m2 (obstructive jaundice, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea), in five of 13 patients at 75 mg/m2 (neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated alkaline phosphatase, abdominal pain, ascites, fatigue) and in four of six patients at 100 mg/m2 (diarrhea, deep vein thrombosis, constipation, leukopenia). Eleven (48%) of 23 patients had a partial response, and nine patients (39%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 months; the median survival was 12.2 months. Conclusion Concomitant use of radioembolization plus irinotecan did not reach a maximum-tolerated dose. The recommended dose of irinotecan in this setting is 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy A. van Hazel
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - David Goldstein
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - Ian N. Olver
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - Michael J. Tapner
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - David Price
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - Geoffrey D. Bower
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - Gregory M. Briggs
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - Monica A. Rossleigh
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - D. James Taylor
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| | - Jacob George
- From Perth Oncology; Mount Nuclear Medicine; and Perth Radiologic Clinic, Mount Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia; Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Departments of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Storr Liver Unit, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead; Sirtex Technology Pty, Lane Cove, Sydney, New South Wales; and Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanoff HK, Goldberg RM, Pignone MP. A systematic review of the use of quality of life measures in colorectal cancer research with attention to outcomes in elderly patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2008; 6:700-9. [PMID: 18039423 DOI: 10.3816/ccc.2007.n.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality of life (QOL) measures are critical to the evaluation of new cancer treatments, particularly for elderly patients. Our intent was to assess patterns of use of QOL endpoints in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment research and to summarize current knowledge about how CRC treatment affects elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We searched MEDLINE for English-language, human trials published from 1995 to 2005 that met the following criteria: reported on patients with CRC, were not surgery-only cohorts, and included a QOL or functional endpoints. Trials specifically reporting data on elderly patients were reviewed in depth and summarized. RESULTS One hundred twenty-one eligible studies and 10 trials with elderly-specific data were found. The median number of trials published annually increased from 5 (range, 4-8 trials) between 1995 and 1999 to 14.5 (range, 11-22 trials) between 2000 and 2005. Chemotherapy was the most commonly studied treatment (55%), and metastatic CRC (55%) was the most commonly studied population. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30, with or without C38, was the most frequently used instrument (49%). Studies reporting on elderly patients showed that many patients experience a decline in physical function immediately after surgery and have increased need for supportive services. Little information is available on the effect of chemotherapy in elderly patients. Use of QOL and functional measures in treatment-related CRC research has increased; however, it continues to be hampered by a lack of dissemination and methodologic problems. CONCLUSION Missing data from patient attrition, limitations of assessment methods, and a small number of patients treated with chemotherapy in the trials reporting on elderly patients seriously limit our ability to draw conclusions from this survey about how treatment affects QOL or function in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna K Sanoff
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7305, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Heusser P, Braun SB, Bertschy M, Burkhard R, Ziegler R, Helwig S, van Wegberg B, Cerny T. Palliative in-patient cancer treatment in an anthroposophic hospital: II. Quality of life during and after stationary treatment, and subjective treatment benefits. Complement Med Res 2006; 13:156-66. [PMID: 16868361 DOI: 10.1159/000092448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing demand for comprehensive forms of palliative cancer care, meeting physical as well as emotional, cognitive, spiritual and social needs. Therapy programs of anthroposophic hospitals are aimed at improving health and quality of life (QoL) at these levels. However, data on the influence of these programs on QoL of patients with advanced cancer are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS 144 in-patients with advanced epithelial cancers were treated at the anthroposophic Lukas Klinik, Arlesheim, Switzerland. QoL was assessed upon admission, discharge and after 4 months, using 20 functional scales from the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30, HADS and SELT-M. Statistical testing was performed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. At month 4, subjectively perceived benefits from anthroposophic medicine (AM) and conventional cancer therapy (CCT) were assessed by telephone. OBJECTIVE The aim was to provide an account of global, physical, emotional, cognitive-spiritual and social QoL developments in advanced cancer patients, during and after in-patient AM treatment, and to investigate subjective benefits from AM and CCT. RESULTS QoL improvements were observed in all 20 dimensions (12 significant). Compared to related studies, improvements were fairly high. At month 4, QoL scores had decreased but were still above baseline in all 20 dimensions. Both AM and CCT were perceived as beneficial. CONCLUSION Our data provide evidence that in-patient therapy at an anthroposophic hospital can lead to significant QoL improvements, especially in emotional, but also global, physical, cognitive-spiritual and social aspects. Benefits of AM were experienced on the physical, emotional, cognitive- spiritual and social level. Benefits of CCT were tumor-focused.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Heusser
- Institute for Complementary Medicine KIKOM, University of Bern, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gasparini G, Gattuso D, Morabito A, Longo R, Torino F, Sarmiento R, Vitale S, Gamucci T, Mariani L. Combined Therapy with Weekly Irinotecan, Infusional 5‐Fluorouracil and the Selective COX‐2 Inhibitor Rofecoxib Is a Safe and Effective Second‐Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Oncologist 2005; 10:710-7. [PMID: 16249351 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-9-710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity of rofecoxib (Vioxx; Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, http://www.merck.com) combined with weekly irinotecan (Camptosar; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, http://www.pfizer.com) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Enrolled patients had previously treated metastatic disease, were aged > or =18 to < or =75 years, and had adequate performance status. A cycle of treatment consisted of i.v. irinotecan on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, rofecoxib at an oral dose of 50 mg/day, and infusional 5-FU at a fixed dose of 200 mg/m(2) per day for 5 weeks followed by 3 weeks of therapy with rofecoxib alone. In the dose-finding study, the starting dose of irinotecan was 87.5 mg/m(2) and further dose escalations were planned by increments of 12.5 mg/m(2) up to 125 mg/m(2). Forty-eight consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Among the 15 cases enrolled in the dose-finding study, one patient experienced grade 3 reversible diarrhea as the dose-limiting toxicity, at the fourth dose level tested. Therefore, the dose of irinotecan for the phase II study was 125 mg/m(2), and 33 patients were enrolled and received a total of 75 cycles. Hematological side effects were moderate, with grade 4 neutropenia recorded in only two patients. The most common nonhematological toxicity was diarrhea, occurring in 25 patients (75.8%) and considered to be of grade 3 in 12 patients (36.4%). Sixteen patients achieved partial responses (48.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30.8%-66.5%), and another 10 patients (30.3%) had stable disease. The median time to progression was 7 months (95% CI, 5-12) and the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months; the 1-year estimated OS rate was 69.4%. The unique schedule tested in this study is feasible, is well-tolerated, and has promising activity in patients with MCRC after progression on oxaliplatin (Eloxatin; Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc., New York, http://www.sanofi-synthelabo.us)-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Köhne CH, van Cutsem E, Wils J, Bokemeyer C, El-Serafi M, Lutz MP, Lorenz M, Reichardt P, Rückle-Lanz H, Frickhofen N, Fuchs R, Mergenthaler HG, Langenbuch T, Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Voigtmann R, Müller L, Genicot B, Anak O, Nordlinger B. Phase III study of weekly high-dose infusional fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40986. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:4856-65. [PMID: 15939923 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.05.546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 281] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate that adding irinotecan to a standard weekly schedule of high-dose, infusional fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]) can prolong progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Four hundred thirty patients with measurable or assessable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either FA 500 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion and FU 2.6 g/m(2) by intravenous 24-hour infusion, both administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie [AIO] arm, n = 216), or a similar schedule but with FU 2.3 or 2.0 g/m(2) preceded by irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) administered over 30 minutes (experimental group, n = 214). RESULTS The median PFS time in the experimental group was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.9 months) compared with 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2 months) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). The median overall survival time was increased from 16.9 to 20.1 months (P = .2779). The objective response rate was 62.2% (95% CI, 55.0% to 69.5%) in the experimental group and 34.4% (95% CI, 27.5% to 41.3%) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). CONCLUSION The addition of irinotecan to the standard AIO FU/FA regimen was associated with a highly significant improvement in PFS and response rate and was well tolerated. The results of this study confirm that irinotecan in combination with high-dose infusional FU/FA is a reference first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-H Köhne
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Dresden, Dresden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Michael M, Brittain M, Nagai J, Feld R, Hedley D, Oza A, Siu L, Moore MJ. Phase II Study of Activated Charcoal to Prevent Irinotecan-Induced Diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:4410-7. [PMID: 15514383 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.11.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeThe dose-limiting toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11; Camptosar) is delayed-onset diarrhea, with an incidence at the grade 3 to 4 level of 20% to 35%. SN38, its active moiety, is responsible by a direct effect on mucosal topoisomerase-I. The aim of this study was to assess whether activated charcoal (AC), possibly by adsorbing free lumenal SN38, can reduce irinotecan-induced diarrhea (CID) and optimize its dose-intensity.Patients and MethodsPatients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan 125 mg/m2intravenously once a week for 4 weeks every 6 weeks were studied. In cycle 1, patients received irinotecan plus AC (5 mL aqueous Charcodote [1,000 mg AC] plus 25 mL water) given the evening before the irinotecan dose and then tid for 48 hours after the dose. In cycle 2, no AC was given. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria diarrhea grade, irinotecan dose-intensity, and loperamide consumption were recorded prospectively in both cycles.ResultsTwenty-eight patients had completed cycle 1 with AC; 24 subsequently completed cycle 2 without AC. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was 7.1% v 25%, and grade 0 diarrhea was 46.4% v 20.8% in cycles 1 and 2, respectively. Median percent planned dose delivered was 98% v 70% in cycles 1 and 2, respectively. In cycles 1 and 2, respectively, 25% v 54% patients took more than 10 loperamide tablets. AC was well tolerated with excellent compliance.ConclusionThe administration of AC with irinotecan reduced the incidence of grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and antidiarrheal medication consumption and increased irinotecan dose-intensity. Prophylactic AC may have a role in reducing dose-limiting CID and optimizing irinotecan therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Michael
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|