Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): relationship between tracer uptake and pathological findings, including preliminary experience in the staging of low-grade NHL

Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the management of marginal zone B cell lymphoma

The use of PET in patients with marginal zone B cell lymphoma (MZL) is controversial because of variability of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity. We analyzed 40 PET/CT in 25 consecutive patients to compare its performance with CT at staging and as a first-line response assessment. Sensitivity of PET/CT and CT was 96 and 76%. Mean standard uptake value was 6.1, 6.9 and 3.4 (p = 0.3) in nodal, extranodal and splenic subtypes, respectively. Of 17 patients (extranodal: n = 9; nodal: n = 6; splenic subtype: n = 2) with both imaging tests available at diagnosis, 8 (47%) had more involved areas with PET/CT than with CT, 75% of which were extranodal lesions. PET/CT resulted in upstaging of five patients although treatment of only two of them was changed. Responses of 15 patients with post-treatment PET/CT were the following: 9 negative and 6 positive of which 3 were isolated residual lesions. Progression was documented in two of these three patients. Response was also assessed by CT in 11 patients. Discrepancies were found in three: Two were in complete remission by CT while PET/CT detected localized residual disease; another patient was in partial remission by CT, whereas PET/CT showed only one positive lesion. Two of these three patients relapsed. Patients with negative post-treatment PET/CT did not relapse. With a median follow-up of 50 months (10-152 months), 3-year overall survival was 100 and 80% for patients with negative and positive post-treatment PET/CT (p = 0.2). Three-year disease-free survival was 86%; the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.3%. Although a larger number of patients will be required to further confirm these data, we can conclude that PET/CT is a useful imaging tool for both staging and response assessment in patients with nodal and extranodal MZL as a result of its high sensitivity, NPV and PPV.

Positron emission tomography: clinical applications in oncology. Part 1

Positron emission tomography is a functional diagnostic imaging technique, which can accurately measure in vivo distribution of a radiopharmaceutical with high resolution. The ability of positron emission tomography to study various biologic processes opens up new possibilities for both research and day-to-day clinical use. Positron emission tomography has progressed rapidly from being a research technique in laboratories to a routine clinical imaging modality becoming part of armamentarium for the medical profession. The most widely used radiotracer in positron emission tomography is 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), which is an analog of glucose. FDG uptake in cells is directly proportional to glucose metabolism of cells. Since glucose metabolism is increased many fold in malignant tumors, positron emission tomography has a high sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Positron emission tomography with FDG is now the standard of care in initial staging, monitoring the response to therapy and management of lung cancer, colorectal cancer, lymphoma, melanoma, esophageal cancer, head and neck cancer and breast cancer. The aim of this article is to review the clinical applications of positron emission tomography in oncology.

Comparison of CT, PET, and PET/CT for staging of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

The aim was to investigate the potential impact of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) as compared to PET and CT on the staging of patients with indolent lymphoma.

PROCEDURES

PET/CTs from 45 patients with indolent lymphoma undergoing staging or restaging were studied. Clinical follow-up, additional imaging, and histology served as the gold standard.

RESULTS

PET/CT correctly diagnosed 92 nodal regions as positive for lymphomatous involvement and 458 as disease free vs 68 and 449 for PET and 64 and 459 for CT, respectively. The respective sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 99%, 100%, and 99.8% for PET/CT, 68%, 97.5%, and 92.2% for PET, and 70%, 100%, and 94.7% for CT. PET/CT performed significantly better than PET (p < 0.001 for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) and CT (p < 0.001 for sensitivity and accuracy). PET/CT also correctly identified significantly more extra-nodal lesions (22) than CT (14) and PET (nine).

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT provides significantly more accurate information compared to PET and CT for the staging and re-staging of patients with indolent lymphoma.

Therapeutic evaluation and prognostic value of interim hybrid PET/CT with (18)F-FDG after three to four cycles of chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

Modern risk-adapted treatment requires accurate assessment of the patient's prognosis. This study assessed the value of hybrid PET/CT with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy for early evaluation of response to therapy and prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive NHL patients (37 male and 24 female) were included. The (18)F-FDG hybrid PET/CT scans were performed prior to chemotherapy (initial scan) and after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy (interim scan). Interim FDG findings were correlated to the PFS using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Regression analyses were employed to test for independence of established pretreatment prognostic factors.

RESULTS

After 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy, positive (18)F-FDG lesions were found in 28 patients, minimal residual uptake (MRU) in 8 and negative scans in 25 patients. In FDG-positive group, 22 patients showed progress and three died. Nine (18)F-FDG-negative patients and 4 patients from the MRU group relapsed. Survival analyses showed highly significant associations between early interim FDG imaging and PFS (P < 0.0005). The 2-year PFS rate for FDG-negative patients was 72.2 and 23.0% for FDG-positive patients. The regression model showed that the predictive value of FDG imaging owed its significance to the very high hazard ratio between patients with positive FDG imaging and patients with negative FDG imaging (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early interim FDG imaging is an excellent and independent predictor of PFS in NHL. An early assessment of chemotherapy response with FDG scans may provide useful information for selection of patients for alternative therapeutic strategies.

Impact of [18f] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on staging and management of early-stage follicular non-hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE

Accurate staging is critical to select patients with early-stage (I-II) follicular lymphoma (ESFL) suitable for involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) and to define the radiotherapy portal. We evaluated the impact of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET on staging, treatment, and outcome for patients with ESFL on conventional staging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two patients with untreated ESFL (World Health Organization Grade I-IIIa, or "low grade") following a minimum of physical examination, computerized tomography, and bone marrow examination (conventional assessment) and who had staging PET from June 1997 to June 2006 were studied retrospectively. Stage allocation was based on routine imaging reports. Disease sites, stage, and management plan were recorded based on conventional assessment or conventional assessment plus PET.

RESULTS

FDG avidity was demonstrated in 97% of patients in whom disease was evident on conventional assessment after biopsy. PET findings suggested a change of stage or management in 19 patients: 13 (31%) who were upstaged to Stage III-IV, altering ideal management from IFRT to systemic therapy, and 6 (14%) who had the involved field enlarged, including 4 upstaged from Stage I to II. Of these 19 cases, PET findings were considered true positive in 8 patients, indeterminate in 10, and false positive in only 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that ESFL is usually FDG-avid. In routine practice, PET has the potential to upstage and thereby alter management in a high proportion of patients with apparent ESFL.

2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in staging, response evaluation, and treatment planning of lymphomas

2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) is used increasingly in the clinical management of lymphomas. With regard to staging, FDG-PET is more sensitive and specific than conventional staging methods in FDG avid lymphomas (ie, Hodgkin lymphoma and most aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas). Despite methodological problems, in particular the lack of a valid reference test, FDG-PET is approved and generally used for this purpose. With regard to response evaluation, FDG-PET at the end of treatment seems to aid considerably in differentiating between residual masses with or without residual lymphoma. Hence, new revised response criteria have been proposed, incorporating the result of FDG-PET at the end of treatment. An early interim FDG-PET scan after 1 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy is a very strong predictor of outcome, and trials are now in progress testing treatment modifications on this basis. With regard to treatment planning, in the context of combined-modality therapy, radiotherapy for lymphomas is moving toward more conformal techniques reducing the irradiated volume to include only the macroscopic lymphoma. In this situation, accurate imaging is essential, and FDG-PET coregistered with the planning computed tomography (CT) scan is used increasingly. The availability of PET/CT scanners suited for virtual simulation has aided this process. However, clinical data evaluating this technique are at present sparse.

[Bone metastases from unknown primary. FDG-PET detection of two synchronous tumors]

A 60-year-old woman presented with noncardiac chest pain over months and negative laboratory findings. Conventional imaging methods and bone scintigraphy detected bone lesions suggesting metastatic disease from an unknown primary tumor. An 18FDG-PET scan performed to orient the search for the primary tumor found focal lesions suggesting lymphoma and identified a focal thyroid lesion and a cervical lymph node accessible for biopsy. The biopsy of this lymph node incidentally detected a papillary differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), since the existence of a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was confirmed after a new biopsy. After confirming the presence of a lymphoma, 18FDG-PET enabled the initial staging of the tumor, the evaluation of the response to treatment, and follow-up for detection of recurrence. On the other hand, 18FDG-PET incidentally detected a DTC.

18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: histology makes the difference

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) is still a matter of debate, and conflicting results have been reported. We have evaluated whether the histological feature of plasmacytic differentiation (PD) might explain the heterogeneous behavior of MALT lymphoma regarding 18F-FDG uptake.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 35 patients with a diagnosis of MALT lymphoma referred to our PET unit were studied. Whole-body 18F-FDG-PET scans were carried out on a General Electrics advanced PET scanner 40 min after i.v. injection of 300-380 MBq 18F-FDG. Images were reconstructed iteratively. In areas with focally elevated FDG uptake, standard uptake values (SUVs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients had MALT lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation (pMALT), while MALT lymphoma without plasmacytic features was diagnosed in 16 patients. Sixteen of 19 patients with PD showed significant 18F-FDG uptake in involved sites (SUV: 3.5-11.7). By contrast, 13 of 16 patients with normal MALT lymphoma showed a false-negative 18F-FDG-PET result. Two of these patients disclosed no tracer uptake in the majority of involved sites apart from one single lesions, while three had a true-positive 18F-FDG-PET scan (SUV: 3.4-6.0).

CONCLUSIONS

18F-FDG-PET visualizes pMALT in a high proportion of patients, whereas FDG-PET results are significantly less reliable in typical MALT (P = 0.001). This finding may partly account for the heterogeneous results of 18F-FDG-PET-studies in MALT lymphoma.

Role of fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with low-grade lymphomas

BACKGROUND

Fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scanning has excellent sensitivity and specificity for staging non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but to the authors' knowledge few studies to date have evaluated FDG-PET in low-grade lymphomas only.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on patients with biopsy-proven nontransformed and transformed follicular lymphoma (FL), B-cell small-cell lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL/CLL), or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who underwent PET and computed tomography (CT) scans within 3 weeks. Standard uptake values (SUV) of all abnormal foci were measured.

RESULTS

In FL, PET demonstrated 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity for staging. PET was more specific than CT for detecting recurrence or assessing therapeutic responses (91% vs. 50%). FDG avidity among patients with WHO Grades 1, 2, and 3 disease was not significantly different (analysis of variance [ANOVA]). For MZL staging, PET had moderate sensitivity (71%) and outperformed CT alone in the depiction of extranodal sites (85% vs. 57% sensitivity). In SLL/CLL, PET sensitivity was 53% and underestimated disease extent in 5 of 19 patients (26%) compared with CT. PET did not affect initial management but confirmed suspected recurrences in 75% of patients. Nontransformed FL had a higher SUV (ANOVA, P < .05) compared with MZL and SLL/CLL. SUV was higher in transformed than in nontransformed tumors (P < .001, Student t test).

CONCLUSIONS

PET usefulness in staging low-grade lymphomas varies depending on histology. PET sensitivity is excellent in FL and moderate in MZL. PET is more specific than CT for follow-up in all types. PET has limited usefulness for SLL/CLL staging. However, a suggestive pattern of hazy and mild uptake was often noted in positive scans. In all low-grade lymphomas, the emergence of foci of intense uptake should raise suspicion of conversion to high-grade disease.

Role of radiation therapy in a patient with primary pancreatic lymphoma

Pancreatic lymphoma is an extremely rare disease. The role of radiation therapy as an adjunct to chemotherapy for the treatment of this disease is poorly defined. We present a case of primary pancreatic lymphoma treated with radiation therapy as an adjunct to chemotherapy.

Integrated PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Directions

For the past 5 years, combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), or PET/CT, has grown because the PET portion provides information that is very different from that obtainable with other imaging modalities. However, the paucity of anatomic landmarks on PET images makes a consistent "hardware fusion" to anatomic cross-sectional data extremely useful. Clinical experience indicates a single direction: Addition of CT to PET improves specificity foremost, but also sensitivity, and the addition of PET to CT adds sensitivity and specificity in tumor imaging. Thus, PET/CT is a more accurate test than either of its individual components and is probably also better than side-by-side viewing of images from both modalities. The synergistic advantage of adding CT is that the attenuation correction needed for PET can also be derived from the CT data, an advantage not obtainable by integrating PET and magnetic resonance imaging. This makes PET/CT 25%-30% faster than PET alone with standard attenuation-correction methods, leading to higher patient throughput and a more comfortable examination, which typically last 30 minutes or less. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT appears to provide relevant information in the staging and therapy monitoring of many tumors, including lung carcinoma, mesothelioma, colorectal cancer, lymphoma, melanoma, and many others, with the notable exception of prostatic cancer. For prostatic cancer, choline derivatives may become useful radiopharmaceuticals. The published literature on the applications of FDG PET/CT in oncology is still limited, but several well-designed studies have demonstrated the benefits of PET/CT.

Evaluation of Therapy for Lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) is the best noninvasive imaging technique for to assess response in patients suffering from lymphoma. Early response evaluation ("interim PET") after one, a few cycles, or at midtreatment can predict response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. We calculated from data of 7 studies an overall sensitivity to predict treatment failure of 79%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 81%, and an accuracy of 85%. Although it is not yet indicated to change patient management based on residual (18)F-FDG uptake on interim scan in chemotherapy-sensitive patients, prospective studies evaluating the role of an interim PET in patient management clearly are warranted. (18)F-FDG PET also has an important prognostic role in relapsing patients after reinduction chemotherapy before high-dose chemotherapy (HCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, all chemotherapy-sensitive patients remain candidates for HCT followed by ASCT, even if (18)F-FDG PET showed residual (18)F-FDG uptake. We calculated from data of 3 studies an overestimated risk of relapse in 16% of all PET-positive patients. Some patients with residual (18)F-FDG uptake will have a good outcome after HCT followed by ASCT. (18)F-FDG PET is the imaging technique of choice for end-of-treatment evaluation. However, (18)F-FDG is not specific for tumoral tissue. Active inflammatory lesions and infectious processes can be falsely interpreted as malignant residual cells. However, a negative (18)F-FDG PET cannot exclude minimal residual disease. Consequently, it is always indicated to correlate PET findings with clinical data, other imaging modalities, and/or a biopsy. We calculated, from data of 17 studies in end-of-treatment evaluation, a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 94%, a PPV of 82%, a NPV 92%, and an accuracy of 89%.

Utility of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging in the management of patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

FDG-PET imaging has a number of advantages in the management of patients with lymphoma. PET shows a functional metabolic status and gives quantitative information. In addition, PET provides whole-body images that give a comprehensive assessment of disease extent during the staging and followup. Based on the present literature, FDG-PET is at least equivalent to CT for the initial staging of lymphomas. The impact of new technologies of combined PET/CT and fast-scanning CT with contrast has yet to be evaluated in the management of lymphoma patients, however. At this point, FDG-PET and CT must be considered as giving complementary staging information. FDG-PET also has high diagnostic accuracy for restaging lymphoma after initial treatment. FDG-PET has shown high accuracy in the early prediction of response to chemotherapy and in the evaluation of residual masses after chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Therefore, PET is likely to play a major role in tailoring the intensity of the treatment to the individual patient. A pretreatment FDG-PET study is essential for accurate assessment of residual masses and early monitoring of response to the treatment. In addition, a baseline PET scan will help detect relapse or residual disease, because relapse occurs most often in the region of previous disease.

Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) has emerged in recent years as an important tool for the evaluation of lymphoma patients during their course of disease. At diagnosis, FDG imaging is capable of detecting nodal and extra nodal sites of disease and provides accurate staging. FDG-PET is superior to computed tomography, during and at the end of first-line treatment or salvage therapeutic regimens, as a tool for monitoring therapeutic response. PET enables the differential diagnosis of residual viable tumor versus a remnant fibrotic or necrotic mass. PET also provides prognostic data of high clinical significance for both Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Results of this metabolic imaging modality, interpreted in view of the pretherapy risk profile of the individual patient, are predictive of the immediate success of a certain therapeutic strategy, as well as of overall and disease-free survival. PET appears to play also an important role in the detection of lymphoma relapse. Data comparing (67)Gallium scintigraphy and FDG-PET indicate the latter as the functional imaging modality of choice for assessment of lymphoma patients. Preliminary studies show an additional value of fused PET/computed tomography imaging for further improved diagnosis, staging and definition of status of lymphoma.

The use of positron emission tomography with [18F] 2-fluoro-D-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) has obtained a place in the management of patients with hematologic disease particularly those with lymphoproliferative disorders. In the staging and monitoring of cancer, the use of PET in combination with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has already demonstrated its benefit when compared with conventional imaging modalities. One such area which has already profited from the use of PET is Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are equivalent in staging and monitoring disease, while gallium-67 imaging is more useful in HD and high grade NHL for studies of response to therapy.Paul et al. in 1987 were the first to describe PET imaging in patients with lymphoma; since this time a number of studies have demonstrated that PET technique is superior to 67 Ga imaging in staging lymphoma before therapy and is useful in the evaluation and the prediction of relapse after high dose therapy with stem cell transplantation.PET is based on the utilisation of positron emitting radiopharmaceuticals and the detection in coincidence of the two nearly collinear 511-keV photons emitted following positron annihilation with an electron in vivo. By surrounding the patients with detectors, a large number of acquired coincident events can lead to the construction of an image of the in vivo radioisotope distribution.

PET for staging of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Metabolic or molecular imaging with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has emerged as a powerful imaging modality for diagnosis, staging, and therapy monitoring of a variety of cancers. The accuracy of FDG-PET as an imaging tool for the primary staging of lymphoma suffers from the absence of a reference criterion to which all imaging modalities can be compared. For ethical reasons, pathological diagnosis is usually not possible for all of the lesions and abnormalities found. In this article, the current state of the art for staging of primary lymphoma is reviewed and the implications for staging and the impact on patient management discussed. Whole-body PET using FDG is superior to conventional staging, i.e., physical examination, laboratory tests, plain radiography, and CT, by 10-20%. The sensitivity of FDG-PET varies for different regions of the body and appears lowest for infradiaphragmatic disease involvement. Staging with metabolic imaging leads in 10-40% of patients to a change in clinical stage. Highly variable results have been reported on whether up- or downstaging of lymphoma with PET leads to changes in the therapeutic approach for primary lymphoma.