Atypical CD8+ Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma After Immunomodulatory Therapy

Increased Risk of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Development after Dupilumab Use for Atopic Dermatitis

There have been several reports of dupilumab use and the development of CTCL; however, the risk of CTCL development has not been adequately evaluated at the population level. The objective of this study is to determine whether dupilumab administration for AD is associated with an increased risk of developing CTCL and to identify at-risk populations within this group. This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a deidentified medical record database including over 107 million patients, to identify eligible patients. Treatment and control groups were evaluated for the development of CTCL. Patients of any age with a documented diagnosis of AD were included. The treatment cohort included individuals treated with dupilumab, while the control cohort included AD patients treated with alternative therapies. Selected biologics were excluded from both groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate three age groups and to identify whether the risk of CTCL development was higher within a given time frame after starting dupilumab. We identified a total of 1,181,533 patients with AD. Of these, 19,612 patients were prescribed dupilumab. Both treatment and control groups included 19,612 patients matched for age, race, and sex. The mean age was 32.3 years (P = 0.96), and females accounted for approximately 52% (P = 0.93) in both groups. Patients treated with dupilumab for AD had an increased relative risk (RR) of developing CTCL compared to those never treated with dupilumab (RR = 4.59, 95% confidence interval 2.459-8.567, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that about half of the CTCL cases after dupilumab therapy (54.5%, 30/55) occurred in patients over the age of 60 years. In contrast, all CTCL cases (100%, 12/12) within the untreated cohort were observed in individuals over the age of 60. Of the patients diagnosed with CTCL following dupilumab use, the majority (62%, 34/55) were diagnosed within the first year. Overall, we find that the use of dupilumab for treating AD is associated with an increased relative risk of developing CTCL. This risk is highest in the first year of therapy and in adult patients. These findings suggest exercising caution in treating select groups of patients with dupilumab.

Development of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Following Biologic Treatment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma following biologic therapy is extremely rare.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the development of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) following treatment with a biologic agent.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed for patients who developed CTCL after exposure to biologic therapy. Works were limited to English language and excluded animal studies, guidelines, and protocols. Potentially eligible titles were identified using controlled vocabulary in tandem with key words. The search strategy was peer-reviewed prior to execution.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight total studies revealed sixty-two patients who developed CTCL following exposure to a biologic agent. Of these, 44% were Caucasian, and the median age at diagnosis was 56 years. Seventy-six percent of patients received biologic therapy for a primary inflammatory skin condition. Dupilumab was the most reported (42%) agent amongst the cohort. The median time from initiation of the biologic agent to diagnosis of CTCL in these cases was 4 months (range: 0-84). Mycosis fungoides (65%) and Sézary syndrome (10%) were the most common subtypes of CTCL diagnosed. Twenty-one (34%) patients were reported to be alive with disease, outcome was not reported in 21 patients (34%), ten patients (16%) were alive and in complete remission, eight patients (13%) died of disease and two patients (3%) died due to other causes.

CONCLUSION

While biologic agents may have a role in the development of CTCL, in order to definitively elucidate their role, more methodologically robust studies (such as those that utilize population databases) would need to occur.

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma arising in association with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a rare cutaneous T cell malignancy of cytotoxic T cell origin. It is frequently associated with autoimmune diseases. It is known to preferentially involve subcutaneous adipose tissue and histologically resembles lupus panniculitis. The aetiology and risk factors of SPTCL are unclear and there are limited studies available since this entity was initially described in 2001. There are even fewer case reports describing the association between SPTCL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this article, we present a case of SPTCL arising during treatment for CLL. We conducted an extensive review of literature to delve into the possible risk factors for SPTCL development in association with CLL, including pre-existing haematological malignancies, autoimmune conditions, immunomodulation and immunosuppressive chemotherapy.

Mycosis fungoides in a patient with ulcerative colitis on anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy

A 46-year-old man with a history of ulcerative colitis (UC) for over 25 years was treated with infliximab for 7 years. He noticed gradually spreading erythema on his right lower abdomen, femur, and buttocks. Skin biopsy from the right lower abdomen revealed massive invasion of lymphocytes in the papillary dermis and epidermal layer. In conjunction with the findings of immunohistochemistry, the skin lesion was diagnosed as mycosis fungoides (MF) at infiltration stage. Infliximab was discontinued, and narrow-band ultraviolet light B therapy was initiated to treat the skin lesion. The patient achieved remission for MF following treatment and UC has not relapsed for more than 1 year with 5-aminosalicylic acid treatment alone. This is the first case of MF in a UC patient treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα). Lymphoma occurrence is a complication of treatment with anti-TNFα agent or thiopurine. However, there is no evidence regarding the relationship between MF and UC. Hence, these immunomodulatory agents may have triggered the occurrence of MF in this case. When treating UC patients with immunomodulatory agents, the possibility of MF or other types of lymphoma as rare complications must be considered.

Risk of mycosis fungoides in psoriatic patients: a critical review

Psoriasis has been controversially associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and mycosis fungoides (MF). Also patients who developed MF after systemic treatment for psoriasis have been reported, and some authors suggested that the association between MF and psoriasis is not infrequent. We performed an extensive literature review in order to examine the risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients with a systematic search of the English-language databases. An increased risk for lymphoma overall in psoriatic patients has been found only by three out of seven studies. The risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients has been investigated by different studies in different populations and with different methodologies presenting bias and limitations, and it seems reasonable that misclassification between psoriasis and MF may explain the association reported. In contrast to the large number of psoriatic patients treated with biologicals, only 27 case reports of MF after biological therapy for psoriasis have been reported, and in 10 cases, the initial psoriasis diagnoses were then revised as MF. A true association between MF and psoriasis is possible, but the real incidence and prevalence are still unknown. The reported higher risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients should be reconsidered in the light of the bias of misclassification and the low magnitude reported in previous studies. There is not enough evidence to support a causal relation among biological therapies and MF in psoriatic patients.

Progression of undiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma after anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous lymphoma diagnosed after anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy (anti-TNF-α) has been reported in the literature, yet a clear link between both events remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience with cutaneous lymphoma diagnosed during or after the use of anti-TNF-α therapies.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study and a literature review.

RESULTS

A total of 22 cases, including 20 cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) and 2 cutaneous B-cell lymphomas, were identified. In the CTCL group, 75% of the patients received an anti-TNF-α agent for a presumed inflammatory skin condition. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome were the most common subtypes of CTCL diagnosed. Advanced disease (stage IIB to IVA) was commonly seen at time of diagnosis and required aggressive therapy, including stem cell transplant in 3 patients; 2 patients in whom cutaneous B-cell lymphomas was diagnosed had an indolent course. A total of 31 cases were gathered from a literature search.

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the disease of most of the identified patients was misdiagnosed as psoriasis or eczema; therefore, a comprehensive morphologic and molecular review of skin biopsy specimens and peripheral blood samples should be considered before initiation of anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with poorly defined dermatitis or atypical presentations of psoriasis.

T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas reported to the FDA AERS with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors: results of the REFURBISH study

OBJECTIVES

The risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors is unclear, whether related to concomitant thiopurines usage or due to the underlying inflammatory disease. We sought to review all cases of T-cell NHL reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors for all approved indications and examine the risk of T-cell NHL with TNF-α inhibitors in comparison with the use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was queried for all lymphomas following treatment with the following TNF-α inhibitors: infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, and their trade names. Full reports for T-cell NHL cases were identified using the Freedom of Information Act. In addition, T-cell NHL reported in patients IBD with the use of the thiopurines-azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and their trade names were also collected. A search of MEDLINE was performed for additional T-cell NHL with TNF-α inhibitors or thiopurines, not reported to the FDA but available in published literature. The histological subtypes of T-cell NHL reported with TNF-α inhibitors were compared with reported subtypes in Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) -17 registry. Reported risk of T-cell NHL in IBD with TNF-α inhibitors, thiopurines, or concomitant use was calculated using Fisher's exact test using 5-aminosalicylates as control drugs.

RESULTS

A total of 3,130,267 reports were downloaded from the FDA AERS (2003-2010). Ninety-one cases of T-cell NHL with TNF-α inhibitors were identified in the FDA AERS and nine additional cases were identified on MEDLINE search. A total of 38 patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 36 cases had Crohn's disease, 11 had psoriasis, 9 had ulcerative colitis, and 6 had ankylosing spondylitis. Sixty-eight of the cases (68%) involved exposure to both a TNF-α inhibitor and an immunomodulator (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, leflunomide, or cyclosporine). Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) was the most common reported subtype, whereas mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome and HSTCL were identified as more common with TNF-α-inhibitor exposure compared with SEER-17 registry. Nineteen cases of T-cell NHL with thiopurines were identified in the FDA AERS and one additional case on MEDLINE. Reported risk of T-cell NHL was higher with TNF-α inhibitor use in combination with thiopurines (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.98-354.09; P<0.0001) and thiopurines alone (95% CI 8.32-945.38; P<0.0001) but not with TNF-α inhibitor use alone (95% CI 0.13-10.61; P=1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of T-cell NHL is increased with TNF-α inhibitor use in combination with thiopurines but not with TNF-α inhibitors alone.

Lymphomatoid papulosis in a patient treated with adalimumab for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are now well regarded as highly effective treatment modalities for multiple immunologically mediated diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and psoriasis. The mechanism of action for this particular class of medications involves the blockade of multiple intracellular signaling pathways originating from TNF-α, ultimately inducing a generalized immunosuppressed state. In fact, several cases of lymphomas have been reported in patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents, though it has been difficult to prove any degree of causality. Herein, we described a patient who developed lymphomatoid papulosis after being treated with adalimumab, whereby a clear causality could be established.

Does p40-targeted therapy represent a significant evolution in the management of plaque psoriasis?

The recognition of the roles of interleukins (IL)-12 and IL-23 in the development of psoriasis is an important advance in the understanding, and the subsequent management, of this chronic inflammatory disease. Two human anti-p40 monoclonal antibodies targeting both IL-12 and IL-23 via their shared p40 subunit have been developed: briakinumab and ustekinumab. Recent Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials have illustrated the benefits of briakinumab (in Phase 3 clinical development) and ustekinumab (approved in the EU, and also in other territories worldwide) in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Available data indicate that a strategy targeting the IL-12 p40 subunit has considerable advantages over targeting of tumour necrosis factor-α, offering rapid onset of efficacy with a favourable dosing regimen (every 12 weeks for ustekinumab). Registries incorporating rigorous pharmacovigilance are now required to further understand the clinical profile of these drugs over long-term use.

Sources of information on lymphoma associated with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents: comparison of published case reports and cases reported to the French pharmacovigilance system

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, through their intense immunoregulatory effect, have been suspected to increase the risk of malignant lymphoma. However, the classical epidemiological approaches conducted over about the last 10 years have not totally succeeded in addressing the question of a causal or artifactual association. Therefore, the analysis of a substantial set of case reports, although usually considered as poorly generalizable to the general population, could be particularly informative. Two main sources of case reports in postmarketing settings are available; publications in medical journals and reports to pharmacovigilance systems.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the characteristics of case reports from both these sources in order to understand whether they provided the same information for the investigation of the causal link between lymphoma and anti-TNF agents.

METHODS

All case reports of malignant lymphoma in patients treated with an anti-TNF agent published in MEDLINE and all reports to the French pharmacovigilance system up to 1 February 2010 were identified. Cases of malignant lymphoma identified in postmarketing surveillance from both sources were compared regarding the following variables: age, sex, anti-TNF agent involved, indication for use, type of lymphoma, prior or concomitant immunosuppressive drugs and time to onset of lymphoma.

RESULTS

A total of 81 published case reports and 61 cases reported to the French pharmacovigilance system were compared. In published reports, patients were younger (p = 0.03) and more frequently receiving a first anti-TNF treatment (p = 0.03), particularly infliximab (p = 0.03). Conversely, in the pharmacovigilance system reports, a succession of different anti-TNFs (p = 0.03) and adalimumab (p < 0.0001) were more frequently reported. Lymphomas in patients treated with anti-TNF agents for Crohn's disease were more prevalent in published cases than in pharmacovigilance reports (p < 0.0001), and in particular involved hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma. Conversely, rheumatoid arthritis was the main indication for anti-TNF agents in pharmacovigilance reports (p = 0.01). Time to onset was markedly shorter in published cases (median 12 months) than in pharmacovigilance reports (median 30 months; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of published cases and those reported to the French pharmacovigilance system differed markedly for all characteristics tested, except sex and the use of prior or concomitant immunosuppressive drugs. Published case reports favoured convincing arguments for drug causation whereas cases reported to the pharmacovigilance system were more disparate but could describe more accurately the reality of lymphoma occurrence in this particular population. These results argue for the use of the pharmacovigilance reports when case reports are used to investigate the causal link between lymphoma and anti-TNF agents at the population level. Data from cases notified to the French pharmacovigilance system did not indicate an increased risk of lymphoma during the early phase of anti-TNF treatment. To confirm this hypothesis, a study combining pharmacovigilance reports from several countries, or, if feasible, a cohort study both with a large sample size and a long duration of follow-up would be required.

Is there truly a risk of lymphoma from biologic therapies?

The treatment of psoriasis has undergone a revolution with the advent of biologic therapies, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, efalizumab, and alefacept. Biologics are generally safe and well tolerated. However, there has been concern over the risk of lymphoma with use of these agents because of their immunosuppressive properties. This review summarizes the current evidence in regards to lymphoma risk with biologic therapy obtained from case reports and case series, observational studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses. The majority of data for T-cell inhibitors comes from case reports and relatively small, short-term clinical trials. In addition to published case reports and case series, TNF-alpha inhibitors have also been studied extensively in large cohort studies and meta-analyses of clinical trials derived primarily from the rheumatoid arthritis population. Current data are neither sufficient to completely rule out an increased risk of lymphoma associated with biologics, nor to firmly establish a causal relationship between biologics and lymphoma. Short- to intermediate-term treatment with biologics (e.g., up to 4 years) appears to be very safe with respect to lymphoma risk, especially with TNF-alpha inhibitors in which their potential risks appear to be well defined. Continued vigilance is warranted; however, in the appropriate patient, the risk-to-benefit profile of psoriasis treatment with respect to lymphoma risk appears highly favorable.

Cutaneous side effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic therapy: a clinical review

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents have been associated with a number of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To review the cutaneous reactions that have been reported in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic MEDLINE search of relevant publications, including case reports and case series.

RESULTS

Reported cutaneous events included infusion and injection site reactions, psoriasiform eruptions, lupus-like disorders, vasculitis, granulomatous reactions, cutaneous infections, and cutaneous neoplasms. Infusion reactions and injection site reactions were definitely associated with anti-TNF administration, whereas all other events had a varying strength of association and severity, not necessarily requiring drug discontinuation.

LIMITATIONS

Most information was derived from spontaneous case reports, where ascertainment biases and frequency of reporting may impair detection methodology and causal relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

As anti-TNF biologic agents are progressively being used in clinical practice, cutaneous adverse events will be encountered more frequently. Until more data are accumulated with respect to their pathogenesis and potential association with anti-TNF therapy, dermatologists should become more familiar with the clinical presentation and management of such events.

T cell lymphoproliferative disorders associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody therapy for ulcerative colitis: literature summary

The enhanced risk of development of lymphoproliferative disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has been attributed to immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapies. Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998 as an effective therapeutic agent against inflammatory bowel disease. Malignant lymphomas of both B and T cell lineage have been described in patients undergoing therapy involving TNF-α blockade. To date, eight cases of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-negative hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma associated with infliximab have been reported to the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System, as well as several other T cell lymphoproliferative disorders with aggressive clinical outcomes. We present the histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of a T cell lymphoproliferative disorder involving the axillary lymph node of a 33-year-old male following infliximab treatment for ulcerative colitis. These EBV-negative lymphomas suggest that lymphoproliferative disorders following infliximab treatment for inflammatory bowel disease may involve EBV-independent immune dysregulation. The spectrum of lymphoproliferative disorders associated with infliximab and the potential mechanisms by which they occur are discussed.

Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations affecting approximately 2% of the population. In this first of 5 sections of the guidelines of care for psoriasis, we discuss the classification of psoriasis; associated comorbidities including autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular risk, psychiatric/psychologic issues, and cancer risk; along with assessment tools for skin disease and quality-of-life issues. Finally, we will discuss the safety and efficacy of the biologic treatments used to treat patients with psoriasis.

A transient benign lymph node-based proliferation of T-cells simulating non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a patient with psoriasis treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha and CD11a antagonists

Background

Therapeutic biologic agents are uncommonly associated with lymphoma.

Case presentation

We report a patient with psoriasis treated with the biologic agents efalizumab (Raptiva^®) and etanercept (Enbrel^®), who developed painless lymphadenopathy with peripheral lymphocytosis during treatment, simulating a non-Hodgkin lymphoma clinically and pathologically. Lymphocytosis and lymphadenopathy spontaneously remitted following cessation of etanercept therapy and have not recurred.

Conclusion

Distinction between clinically benign lymphoid proliferations related to antipsoriasis therapy and malignant lymphoma avoids the unnecessary use of anti-lymphoma chemotherapy.

Cutaneous T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas: the WHO-EORTC classification and the increasing recognition of specialized tumor types

Cases drawn from Session 5 of the 2005 Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology Workshop on progress in T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell malignancies are used as a framework to review the current classification of T-cell and NK-cell malignancies in skin. In comparison with the typical pattern and course of mycosis fungoides (MF), selected variants of MF that can be difficult to diagnose are discussed. Cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders are also presented in detail. Particular focus is placed on the recognition of rare but clinically more aggressive cytotoxic lymphomas in the skin. Overall, diagnostic pitfalls and new information regarding disease pathogenesis brought up by the Workshop cases are provided. In addition, a general approach to the diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas is discussed.

[Efalizumab]

Efalizumab (Raptiva, Serono) is a humanised monoclonal antibody (IgG1) produced by biotechnology. This antibody has a novel place among biotherapies for psoriasis. It is bound to the CD11a subunit of a surface molecule of the T lymphocyte LFA-1 (Leucocyte Function-associated Antigen-1). This molecule is essential for binding of T lymphocytes to the ICAM-1 molecule (Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1) found on antigen-presenting cells, endothelial cells and keratinocytes. Binding of efalizumab to CD11a prevents binding of LFA-1 to ICAM-1, thus inhibiting several steps in the immunological process responsible for formation of psoriatic plaque (activation of naive T lymphocytes to memory T lymphocytes, lymphocyte migration and reactivation of T lymphocytes in skin). Efalizumab was approved in the United States by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in 2003 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis requiring systemic therapy. It may be used as first-line therapy in the United States in this indication. In France, marketing authorisation (MA) was granted more recently in September 2005. The indications are moderate-to-severe cutaneous plaque psoriasis in adults in cases of failure, intolerance or contraindication of at least two systemic treatments including phototherapy, methotrexate and cyclosporine. Current clinical trial data is available for 3500 patients with plaque psoriasis. A 75% improvement in PASI score was seen in between 22 and 39% of patients treated with efalizumab (vs. 2 to 5% for patients on placebo) in a single weekly subcutaneous injection (1 mg/kg). A study in good responders confirms the continuing long-term efficacy of prescription of the drug up to 36 months (with at least a 75% improvement in PASI score in 53% of patients). However, it is not effective against joint involvement in psoriasis. The most common side-effects (incidence >1/100) are influenza-like syndrome, risk of outbreak of cutaneous psoriasis during or after discontinuation of treatment, worsening of arthralgia, minor hypersensitivity reactions, reversible changes in laboratory values (hyperlymphocytosis, elevated alkaline phosphatases and transaminases). Because of rare cases of thrombocytopenia (incidence<1/100), reversible on discontinuation of treatment, monthly monitoring of platelet counts is required over the first 3 months of therapy. There are currently no randomised studies comparing the various systemic treatments (standard therapy and biotherapy) for psoriasis. However, on extrapolation of the available results concerning efficacy (PASI-75 after 12 weeks of treatment), efalizumab appears to be less efficacious than anti-TNF alpha agents. This drug constitutes an additional treatment option and its position in the therapeutic arsenal will depend upon its long-term benefit/risk ratio in relation to other biotherapies.