Triple combination therapy for hepatitis C with telaprevir exhibits greater early antiviral activity than with boceprevir

Two-Year Follow-Up Analysis of Telaprevir-Based Antiviral Triple Therapy for HCV Recurrence in Genotype 1 Infected Liver Graft Recipients as a First Step towards Modern HCV Therapy

Objective. The introduction of protease inhibitors telaprevir and boceprevir in 2011 had extended the antiviral treatment options especially in genotype 1 infected hepatitis C relapsers and nonresponders to interferon/ribavirin therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term treatment efficiency of telaprevir-based triple therapy for patients with hepatitis C reinfection after orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients and Methods. We included 12 patients with histologically confirmed graft fibrosis due to hepatitis C reinfection. The treatment duration was scheduled as 12 weeks of telaprevir-based antiviral triple therapy followed by 36 weeks of dual therapy with pegylated interferon/ribavirin. The patients were followed up for two years after the end of triple therapy. Results. Of the 12 patients, 6 (50%) completed the full 48 weeks of antiviral treatment. An end of treatment response and a sustained virological response 52 weeks after the end of the antiviral treatment course were achieved in 8/12 (67%) and 7/12 (58%) patients, respectively. Conclusion. Telaprevir-based triple therapy was shown to be a long-term effective but complex treatment option for individual patients with hepatitis C graft. With the recent improvements in hepatitis C therapy options telaprevir may not be recommended as a standard therapy for this indication anymore.

HCV viral load at baseline and at week 4 of telaprevir/boceprevir based triple therapies are associated with virological outcome in HIV/hepatitis C co-infected patients

BACKGROUND

As first generation HCV-specific protease inhibitors, boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TVR) can achieve 60% to 70% sustained virological response (SVR) for HCV infected patients with genotype 1 infections, they could remain temporary a therapeutic option in patients living in resources limited countries with limited access to the new anti-HCV direct acting antiviral (DAA) drugs, such as sofosbuvir.

OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN

Here we evaluated in a routine practice setting, the treatment responses, tolerance and factors associated with SVR of a triple therapy with BOC or TVR, combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, included in a large cohort of HIV/HCV coinfected patients (ANRS CO13-HEPAVIH).

RESULTS

Among the 89 HIV/HCV coinfected patients treated, 65% of whom were previous non-responders to PegIFN/RBV therapy, 65%, 55% and 41% had at baseline genotype 1a, a high baseline HCV-RNA (≥800,000 IU/ml) and a cirrhosis, respectively. The SVR12 rate was 63% overall, 53% for BOC-based regimen and 66% for TVR-based regimen. In multivariate analysis, two factors were significantly associated with HCV SVR: HCV viral load <800,000 IU/mL at treatment initiation versus ≥800,000 IU/mL (OR 4.403, 95% CI 1.29-15.04; p=0.018) and virological response at W4 (HCV-RNA undetectable after 4 weeks of triple therapy) (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.07-10.48; p=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall SVR12 was 63% and our results suggest that HIV/HCV coinfected patients with low HCV viral load (<800,000 IU/mL) and undetectable HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of triple therapy with TVR or BOC-based regimen have a higher probability of treatment success.

Impact of IL28B genotype on first-week response to telaprevir-based therapy in HIV-HCV coinfection

BACKGROUND

IL28B genotype predicts response to treatment against HCV with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PR) and impacts on the outcome of therapy including telaprevir (TVR). This study aimed to determine the influence of the favourable IL28B genotype on early viral kinetics during therapy with TVR/PR in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients.

METHODS

All HIV-HCV genotype 1 coinfected subjects who received TVR/PR for at least 4 weeks were included from populations prospectively followed in 22 centres throughout Germany, Switzerland and Spain.

RESULTS

Of the 129 subjects included, 38 (29.5%) presented with IL28B genotype CC and 94 (72.9%) were treatment-experienced. A total of 96 (73.8%) patients showed undetectable plasma HCV RNA at treatment week (W)4: 30 (78.9%) of the IL28B-CC carriers and 65 (71.4%) of the non-CC carriers (P=0.377). Among treatment-naive patients, proportions of undetectable HCV RNA among IL28B-CC versus non-CC carriers were 8/9 (88.9%) versus 3/9 (33.3%; P=0.016) and 14/17 (82.4%) versus 11/18 (61.1%; P=0.164) at W2 and W4. The decrease of HCV RNA at W2 and W4 was similar among the IL28B carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

IL28B genotype does not predict W4 response to TVR/PR in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients, regardless of their treatment history. However, there is evidence of an impact on response during the first weeks in treatment-naive patients.

Hepatitis C virus infection in patients with HIV-1: epidemiology, natural history and management

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver diseases have contributed to increased morbidity and mortality in HIV-1-infected individuals in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy. HCV transmission patterns have changed among the HIV co-infected population during the last decade, with acute HCV infection emerging worldwide. HIV infection accelerates the progression of HCV-related liver diseases and consequently cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the current standard treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin results in only a limited viral response. Furthermore, cumbersome pill regimens, antiretroviral related hepatotoxicity, and drug interactions of HCV and HIV regimens complicate therapy strategies. Fortunately, in the near future, new direct-acting anti-HCV agents will widen therapeutic options for HCV/HIV co-infection. Liver transplantation is also gradually accepted as a therapeutic option for end stage liver disease of HCV/HIV co-infected patients.

Defer or treat? Reasons for treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 in the early era of directly acting antiviral agents

BACKGROUND

In chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C, telaprevir or boceprevir plus peginterferon and ribavirin have become the new standard of care. Aim of this study was to identify factors contributing to the decision whether to defer or treat with the current triple regimens.

METHODS

Prospective assessment of eight parameters on 0-4-point scales by the attending physician at a German tertiary referral centre between 1st September 2011 and 31st December 2012.

RESULTS

307 patients were evaluated at least once by one of the 11 hepatologists involved; 267 patients were considered, but only 163 were recommended to receive triple therapy. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that a higher degree of fibrosis was most strongly associated with a recommendation for treatment (OR 2.69), followed by the patients' demand (OR 2.27), presumed efficacy (OR 1.62), and tolerability (OR 1.58). A high risk of decompensation was associated with the decision to defer (OR 0.39). Speed of progression, compliance, extrahepatic manifestation, gender and age were not significantly related to the recommendation. Treatment was finally started in 101 patients (32.9%).

CONCLUSION

In chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C, advanced fibrosis and patients' preference are the main rationales to choose treatment rather than deferral in a real-life setting.

Update on HIV/HCV coinfection

Liver disease is currently one of the leading causes of hospitalization and death in HIV-positive individuals. Coinfection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major contributor to this trend. Besides hepatic damage, which is enhanced in the presence of HIV-associated immunosuppression, HCV may contribute to disease in coinfected individuals by potentiating immune activation and chronic inflammation, which ultimately account for an increased risk of cardiovascular events, kidney disease, and cancers in this population. Fortunately, hepatitis C therapeutics has entered a revolutionary era in which we hope that most patients treated with the new oral direct-acting antivirals (DAA) will be cured. However, many challenges preclude envisioning a prompt elimination of HCV from the coinfected population. Issues that should be addressed include the following: (1) rising incidence of acute hepatitis C in men who have sex with men, and expansion/recrudescence of injection drug use in some settings/regions; (2) adverse drug interactions between antiretrovirals and DAA; and (3) high cost of DAA, which may lead many to defer or fail to access appropriate therapy.

Optimizing treatment in HIV/HCV coinfection

Sustained virological response (SVR) to anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is an outcome that can improve life expectancy in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Results of anti-HCV treatment are poor, and less than 50% of treated patients show SVR to peginterferon plus ribavirin combination therapy; in infections from HCV genotype 1 this proportion is less than 40%. Pilot studies have demonstrated that Boceprevir or Telaprevir in combination with peginterferon plus ribavirin are able to increase the SVR rate from 45% to 74% with Telaprevir, and from 26% to 61% with Boceprevir in persons never treated for hepatitis C. Interim data seem to indicate a high rate of HCV RNA undetectability on treatment also in patients without sustained response to peginterferon plus ribavirin. Both Telaprevir and Boceprevir have drug-drug interactions with antiretrovirals, and options for concurrent antiretroviral therapy are restricted. There are also several new anti-HCV drugs under study with the potential for more tolerable effective future regimens. The indication for treatment in a patient with HCV/HIV coinfection should take into account the priority of treatment, the probability of sustained response, the potential toxicities, the concurrent antiretroviral therapy options, the patient's motivation, and the sustainability of current and future therapies.