LINK-A lncRNA participates in the pathogenesis of glioma by interacting with survivin

LINK-A: unveiling its functional role and clinical significance in human tumors

LINK-A, also recognized as LINC01139, has emerged as a key oncological lncRNA in cancer. LINK-A is upregulated in solid and liquid tumor samples, including breast cancer, ovarian cancer, glioma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and mantle cell lymphoma. Notably, LINK-A is involved in regulating critical cancer-related pathways, such as AKT and HIF1α signaling, and is implicated in a range of oncogenic activities, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell invasion and migration, and glycolysis reprogramming. LINK-A's differential expression and its correlation with clinical features enable it to be a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and the stratification of tumor progression. Additionally, LINK-A's contribution to the development of resistance to cancer therapies, including AKT inhibitors and immunotherapy, underscores its potential as a therapeutic target. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the available data on LINK-A, focusing on its molecular regulatory pathways and clinical significance. By exploring the multifaceted nature of LINK-A in cancer, the review aims to offer a valuable resource for future research directions, potentially guiding the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting this lncRNA in cancer treatment.

Inhibition of LINK-A lncRNA overcomes ibrutinib resistance in mantle cell lymphoma by regulating Akt/Bcl2 pathway

Ibrutinib, a bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor which suppresses B-cell receptor signaling, has remarkably improved the outcome of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, approximately 33% of MCL patients have primary Ibrutinib resistance, and acquired Ibrutinib resistance is nearly universal. Long intergenic non-coding RNA for kinase activation (LINK-A) exerts oncogenic role in different types of tumors, but the role of LINK-A in intrinsic ibrutinib resistance in MCL is still unclear. Here, LINK-A expression level was first assessed using quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR) and immunofluorescence analysis in five MCL cell lines. The effect of LINK-A on regulating MCL cells viability and apoptosis was assayed using CCK-8 and TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, respectively. The association of LINK-A with AKT activation and B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2)expression was evaluated using qPCR and western blot analysis. We found that LINK-A level was elevated in Ibrutinib-resistant MCL cell lines (Mino, REC-1, MAVER-1, and Granta-519) compared to Ibrutinib-sensitive MCL cell lines (Jeko-1). Functionally, LINK-A overexpression in Jeko-1 cells enhanced cell viability and repressed Ibrutinib-induced cell apoptosis. LINK-A knockdown in MAVER-1 cells decreased cell viability and further accelerated Ibrutinib-induced cell apoptosis. LINK-A overexpression enhanced Bcl2 expression in Jeko-1 cells, and Bcl2 inhibition blocked the effect of LINK-A on increasing cell viability in the presence of Ibrutinib. On the contrary, LINK-A knockdown reduced Bcl2 expression in MAVER-1 cells, and Bcl2 overexpression damaged the role of LINK-A inhibition in regulating cell viability. Mechanistically, LINK-A positively regulated the activation of AKT signaling, and inhibition of AKT signaling destroyed LINK-A-induced increased of Bcl2 and resulted in a subsequent suppression of cell viability. Taken together, the current results demonstrate that LINK-A inhibition overcomes Ibrutinib resistance in MCL cells by regulating AKT/Bcl2 pathway.

Long Non-Coding RNAs in Diagnosis, Treatment, Prognosis, and Progression of Glioma: A State-of-the-Art Review

Glioma is the most common malignant central nervous system tumor with significant mortality and morbidity. Despite considerable advances, the exact molecular pathways involved in tumor progression are not fully elucidated, and patients commonly face a poor prognosis. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have recently drawn extra attention for their potential roles in different types of cancer as well as non-malignant diseases. More than 200 lncRNAs have been reported to be associated with glioma. We aimed to assess the roles of the most investigated lncRNAs in different stages of tumor progression and the mediating molecular pathways in addition to their clinical applications. lncRNAs are involved in different stages of tumor formation, invasion, and progression, including regulating the cell cycle, apoptosis, autophagy, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, tumor stemness, angiogenesis, the integrity of the blood-tumor-brain barrier, tumor metabolism, and immunological responses. The well-known oncogenic lncRNAs, which are upregulated in glioma, are H19, HOTAIR, PVT1, UCA1, XIST, CRNDE, FOXD2-AS1, ANRIL, HOXA11-AS, TP73-AS1, and DANCR. On the other hand, MEG3, GAS5, CCASC2, and TUSC7 are tumor suppressor lncRNAs, which are downregulated. While most studies reported oncogenic effects for MALAT1, TUG1, and NEAT1, there are some controversies regarding these lncRNAs. Expression levels of lncRNAs can be associated with tumor grade, survival, treatment response (chemotherapy drugs or radiotherapy), and overall prognosis. Moreover, circulatory levels of lncRNAs, such as MALAT1, H19, HOTAIR, NEAT1, TUG1, GAS5, LINK-A, and TUSC7, can provide non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tools. Modulation of expression of lncRNAs using antisense oligonucleotides can lead to novel therapeutics. Notably, a profound understanding of the underlying molecular pathways involved in the function of lncRNAs is required to develop novel therapeutic targets. More investigations with large sample sizes and increased focus on in-vivo models are required to expand our understanding of the potential roles and application of lncRNAs in glioma.

Long non‑coding RNA FOXD2‑AS1 regulates the tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer via the S100 calcium binding protein A1/Hippo signaling pathway

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancer types and is accompanied by a high incidence and mortality rate, severely threatening women's health globally. Long non‑coding RNA forkhead box D2 adjacent apposite strand RNA 1 (lncRNA FOXD2‑AS1) has been identified to function as an oncogene in human cancers; however, it has rarely been investigated in breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of FOXD2‑AS1 in breast cancer, and to clarify the underlying mechanisms. The expression of FOXD2‑AS1 in breast cancer cell lines was first quantified by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR, and the biological function of FOXD2‑AS1 was then determined. Cellular proliferative ability was determined by Cell Counting kit‑8 assay, and wound healing and Transwell assays were conducted to assess the cell migratory and invasive ability. Corresponding protein expression levels were determined by western blot analysis. In addition, experimental animal models were established by the subcutaneous injection of MDA‑MB‑468 cells into the right axillary lymph nodes of BALB/c nude mice, and the effects of FOXD2‑AS1 on tumor growth were observed. The results indicated that FOXD2‑AS1 expression was upregulated in breast cancer cell lines, and that FOXD2‑AS1 downregulation significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasiveness of MCF‑7 and MDA‑MB‑468 cells. S100 calcium binding protein A1 (S100A1) was also upregulated in breast cancer cell lines and was positively regulated by FOXD2‑AS1. Furthermore, the inhibition of S100A1 and the overexpression of the serine/threonine‑protein kinase, large tumor suppressor homolog 1 (LATS1), inhibited the FOXD2‑AS1‑induced cellular proliferation, migration and invasiveness in breast cancer. Experimental mouse models revealed that FOXD2‑AS1 downregulation significantly inhibited tumor growth, and that the levels of phosphorylated (p‑)YAP and p‑LATS1 were upregulated by FOXD2‑AS1 knockdown, indicating that the inhibition of FOXD2‑AS1 activated Hippo/yes‑associated protein signaling. On the whole, the findings of the present study suggest that the FOXD2‑AS1/S100A1/Hippo axis is involved in the tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer. In the future, these may contribution to the identification of more effective breast cancer treatments.