Prediction of toxicity but not of clinical course by determining carboplatin exposure in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with a combination of carboplatin and cisplatin

Ototoxicity prognostic models in adult and pediatric cancer patients: a rapid review

PURPOSE

A cornerstone of treatment for many cancers is the administration of platinum-based chemotherapies and/or ionizing radiation, which can be ototoxic. An accurate ototoxicity risk assessment would be useful for counseling, treatment planning, and survivorship follow-up in patients with cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review evaluated the literature on predictive models for estimating a patient's risk for chemotherapy-related auditory injury to accelerate development of computational approaches for the clinical management of ototoxicity in cancer patients. Of the 1195 articles identified in a PubMed search from 2010 forward, 15 studies met inclusion for the review.

CONCLUSIONS

All but 1 study used an abstraction of the audiogram as a modeled outcome; however, specific outcome measures varied. Consistently used predictors were age, baseline hearing, cumulative cisplatin dose, and radiation dose to the cochlea. Just 5 studies were judged to have an overall low risk of bias. Future studies should attempt to minimize bias by following statistical best practices including not selecting multivariate predictors based on univariate analysis, validation in independent cohorts, and clearly reporting the management of missing and censored data. Future modeling efforts should adopt a transdisciplinary approach to define a unified set of clinical, treatment, and/or genetic risk factors. Creating a flexible model that uses a common set of predictors to forecast the full post-treatment audiogram may accelerate work in this area. Such a model could be adapted for use in counseling, treatment planning, and follow-up by audiologists and oncologists and could be incorporated into ototoxicity genetic association studies as well as clinical trials investigating otoprotective agents.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Improvements in the ability to model post-treatment hearing loss can help to improve patient quality of life following cancer care. The improvements advocated for in this review should allow for the acceleration of advancements in modeling the auditory impact of these treatments to support treatment planning and patient counseling during and after care.

Applying U.S. national guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring in adult patients: perspectives on patient populations, service gaps, barriers and solutions

OBJECTIVES

To promote establishment of effective ototoxicity monitoring programs (OMPs), this report reviews the U.S. national audiology guidelines in relation to "real world" OMP application. Background is provided on the mechanisms, risks and clinical presentation of hearing loss associated with major classes of ototoxic medications.

DESIGN

This is a non-systematic review using PubMed, national and international agency websites, personal communications between ototoxicity experts, and results of unpublished research. Examples are provided of OMPs in various healthcare settings within the U.S. civilian sector, Department of Defense (DoD), and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

STUDY SAMPLE

The five OMPs compared in this report represent a convenience sample of the programs with which the authors are affiliated. Their opinions were elicited via two semi-structured teleconferences on barriers and facilitators of OMP, followed by a self-administered questionnaire on OMP characteristics and practices, with responses synthesized herein. Preliminary results are provided from an ongoing VA clinical trial at one of these OMP sites. Participants were 40 VA patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy in 2014-2017. The study arms contrast access to care for OMP delivered on the treatment unit versus usual care as provided in the audiology clinic.

RESULTS

Protocols of the OMPs examined varied, reflecting their diverse settings. Service delivery concerns included baseline tests missed or completed after the initial treatment, and monitoring tests done infrequently or only after cessation of treatment. Perceived barriers involved logistics related to accessing and testing patients, such as a lack of processes to help patients enter programs, patients' time and scheduling constraints, and inconvenient audiology clinic locations. Use of abbreviated or screening methods facilitated monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The most effective OMPs integrated audiological management into care pathways of the clinical specialties that prescribe ototoxic medications. More OMP guidance is needed to inform evaluation schedules, outcome reporting, and determination of actionable ototoxic changes. Guidance is also lacking on the use of hearing conservation approaches suitable for the mass testing needed to support large-scale OMP efforts. Guideline adherence might improve with formal endorsement from organizations governing the medical specialty stakeholders in OMP such as oncologists, pulmonologists, infectious disease specialists, ototolaryngologists and pharmacists.

Prospective validation of renal function-based carboplatin dosing in children with cancer: A United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Trial

PURPOSE

Carboplatin dosing in adults with cancer is based on renal function. The purpose of the current study was to validate a previously developed pediatric carboplatin-dosing formula.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight pediatric patients were randomized to receive a carboplatin dose calculated according to surface area or a renal function-based dosing formula. On the next course of therapy, the alternative dosing method was used for each patient. Carboplatin pharmacokinetics (based on free plasma platinum concentrations) were measured after both courses.

RESULTS

The mean observed areas under the carboplatin concentration-versus-time curve (AUCs) after renal function- and surface area-based dosing were 98% and 95% of the target AUCs, respectively. The variation in the observed AUC was significantly less after renal function-based dosing (F test, P =.02), such that 74% of courses had an observed AUC within +/- 20% of the target value, versus 49% for courses after dosing according to surface area. Only one of 22 courses at the center with the most experience with renal function-based dosing was associated with an AUC outside +/- 20% of the target value, versus nine of 22 courses after surface area-based dosing in the same center. There was a relationship (r(2) =.71) between carboplatin AUC and thrombocytopenia in 10 neuroblastoma patients treated with a combination of carboplatin, vincristine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSION

Renal function-based carboplatin dosing in children results in more consistent drug exposure than surface area-based drug administration.