Carboplatin-etoposide combination chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A retrospective study

Advancements in platinum chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Insights and perspectives

Despite improvements in survival, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a significant clinical challenge. While taxanes, new hormonal agents, radiopharmaceuticals, and PARP inhibitors offer valuable treatment options, this review explores the potential of platinum chemotherapies (carboplatin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin) as alternative choices. Existing research demonstrates promising preliminary results for platinum-based therapies in mCRPC showing PSA response rates (7.7-95 %) and improved overall survival (8-26.6 months). However, chemotherapy-related cytopenias are a frequent side effect. Further research is underway to evaluate the efficacy of platinum regimens against specific mCRPC histopathological variants, particularly aggressive subtypes where the carboplatin and cabazitaxel combination is already recommended. The unique DNA-targeting action of platinum therapy holds promise for patients with deficient DNA repair (dDDR), especially those with BRCA mutations. This potential is supported by both preclinical and ongoing clinical research. Given the limited success of immunotherapy in mCRPC, researchers are exploring the potential for platinum therapies to enhance its efficacy. Additionally, trials are investigating the synergy of combining platinum therapy with both immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors. Further exploration into the effectiveness of platinum therapies in specific mCRPC subpopulations, particularly those with dDDR, is crucial for optimizing their future use. In conclusion, this review highlights the promising potential of platinum-based chemotherapy as a valuable treatment option for mCRPC. While current evidence is encouraging, ongoing research is essential to further optimize its efficacy, identify optimal combinations with other therapies, and better understand its impact on specific mCRPC subpopulations.

Carboplatin and Etoposide for the Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer with or without Neuroendocrine Features: A French Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy using carboplatin and etoposide (CE) is frequently pragmatically proposed to treat metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), both primary small-cell neuroendocrine (PSC-NE) carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with or without neuroendocrine (NE) marker elevation. However, the real benefit of CE is poorly reported in the recent therapeutic context.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and tolerance of CE chemotherapy in these three different groups of mPC patients. Efficacy endpoints included radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), as well as PSA response and PFS2/PFS1 ratio in patients with adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included in this single-center study (N = 18 with PSC-NE carcinoma and 51 with adenocarcinoma with (N = 18) or without (N = 33) NE marker elevation). Patients with adenocarcinoma were highly pretreated with next-generation hormonal agents (NHAs) and taxanes. In patients with adenocarcinoma, a PSA response ≥50% was observed in six patients (15.8%), four of whom had NE marker elevation. The radiological response was higher in PSC-NE and tended to be higher in adenocarcinoma when NE marker elevation was present. Comparing patients with adenocarcinoma with vs. without NE marker elevation, the median PFS was 3.7 and 2.1 months and the median OS was 7.7 and 4.7 months, respectively. Overall, 62.3% of patients experienced grade 3-4 adverse events (mainly hematological), and three treatment-related deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Reports of the clinical results of CE suggest that we should not mix PSC-NE and castration-resistant adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In patients with heavily pretreated adenocarcinoma, the benefit/risk ratio of CE chemotherapy seems unfavorable due to poor response and high toxicity.

Clinical Translation of Targeted α-Therapy: An Evolution or a Revolution?

The field of radioligand therapy has advanced greatly in recent years, driven largely by β-emitting therapies targeting somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors and the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Now, more clinical trials are under way to evaluate α-emitting targeted therapies as potential next-generation theranostics with even higher efficacy due to their high linear energy and short range in human tissues. In this review, we summarize the important studies ranging from the first Food and Drug Administration-approved α-therapy, ²²³Ra-dichloride, for treatment of bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer, including concepts in clinical translation such as targeted α-peptide receptor radiotherapy and ²²⁵Ac-PSMA-617 for treatment of prostate cancer, innovative therapeutic models evaluating new targets, and combination therapies. Targeted α-therapy is one of the most promising fields in novel targeted cancer therapy, with several early- and late-stage clinical trials for neuroendocrine tumors and metastatic prostate cancer already in progress, along with significant interest and investment in additional early-phase studies. Together, these studies will help us understand the short- and long-term toxicity of targeted α-therapy and potentially identify suitable therapeutic combination partners.

Delineating the tumour-regulatory roles of EYA4

Eyes absent homolog 4 (EYA4) is a protein that regulates many vital cellular processes and organogenesis pathways. It possesses phosphatase, hydrolase, and transcriptional activation functions. Mutations in the Eya4 gene can cause sensorineural hearing loss and heart disease. In most non-nervous system cancers such as those of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), hematological and respiratory systems, EYA4 acts as a putative tumor suppressor. However, in nervous system tumors such as glioma, astrocytoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), it plays a putative tumor-promoting role. EYA4 interacts with various signaling proteins of the PI3K/AKT, JNK/cJUN, Wnt/GSK-3β, and cell cycle pathways to exert its tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing effect. The tissue expression level and methylation profiles of Eya4 can help predict the prognosis and anti-cancer treatment response among cancer patients. Targeting and altering Eya4 expression and activity could be a potential therapeutic strategy to suppress carcinogenesis. In conclusion, EYA4 may have both putative tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing roles in different human cancers and has the potential to serve as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic agent in various cancer types.

Effects of etoposide combined with cisplatin on prognosis of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed castration treatment

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influences of etoposide combined with cisplatin on prognosis of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who failed castration treatment.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with metastatic CRPC who failed castration treatment in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a control group (n=59) treated with docetaxel combined with prednisone and an experimental group (n=41) treated with etoposide combined with cisplatin (EP). The change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was adopted as the evaluation criterion for efficacy, by which the total clinical effective rate of patients was calculated. The neurologic rating scale (NRS) was adopted to evaluate the pain of patients, and the incidence of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups. Cox regression was carried out to analyze independent prognostic factors impacting 3-year survival.

RESULTS

The experimental group showed a significantly better clinical improvement than the control group (P<0.05). According to further analysis, the experimental group had a significantly higher clinical efficacy rate than the control group (P<0.05). Life quality scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05). The two groups were not greatly different in bone pain, or incidence of adverse reactions (both P>0.05). The median survival time of the control group was 15.9 months, while that of the experimental group was 18 months, and the control group experienced a greatly shorter median survival time than the experimental group (P=0.040). According to Cox regression analysis, Gleason score, clinical stage, and metastasis were independent factors impacting the patients' 3-year prognosis (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

EP regimen can strongly improve the 3-year survival rate of patients, without increasing adverse reactions.

DNA-PKc inhibition overcomes taxane resistance by promoting taxane-induced DNA damage in prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Overcoming taxane resistance remains a major clinical challenge in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Loss of DNA repair proteins is associated with resistance to anti-microtubule agents. We propose that alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathway contribute to taxane resistance, and identification of these alterations may provide a potential therapeutic target to resensitize docetaxel-refractory mCRPC to taxane-based therapy.

METHODS

Alterations in DDR gene expression in our prostate cancer cell line model of docetaxel-resistance (DU145-DxR) derived from DU-145 cells were determined by DDR pathway-specific polymerase chain reaction array and immunoblotting. The PRKDC gene encoding DNA-PKc (DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic unit), was noted to be overexpressed and evaluated for its role in docetaxel resistance. Cell viability and clonogenic survival of docetaxel-treated DU145-DxR cells were assessed after pharmacologic inhibition of DNA-PKc with three different inhibitors-NU7441, LTURM34, and M3814. Response to second-line cytotoxic agents, cabazitaxel and etoposide upon DNA-PKc inhibition was also tested. The impact of DNA-PKc upregulation on DNA damage repair was evaluated by comet assay and analysis of double-strand breaks marker, γH2AX and Rad51. Lastly, DNA-PKc inhibitor's effect on MDR1 activity was assessed by rhodamine 123 efflux assay.

RESULTS

DDR pathway-specific gene profiling revealed significant upregulation of PRKDC and CDK7, and downregulation of MSH3 in DU145-DxR cells. Compared to parental DU145, DU145-DxR cells sustained significantly less DNA damage when exposed to etoposide and docetaxel. Pharmacologic inhibition of DNA-PKc, a component of NHEJ repair machinery, with all three inhibitors, significantly resensitized DU145-DxR cells to docetaxel. Furthermore, DNA-PKc inhibition also resensitized DU145-DxR to cabazitaxel and etoposide, which demonstrated cross-resistance. Inhibition of DNA-PKc led to increased DNA damage in etoposide- and docetaxel-treated DU145-DxR cells. Finally, DNA-PKc inhibition did not affect MDR1 activity, indicating that DNA-PKc inhibitors resensitized taxane-resistant cells via an MDR1-independent mechanism.

CONCLUSION

This study supports a role of DDR genes, particularly, DNA-PKc in promoting resistance to taxanes in mCRPC. Targeting prostatic DNA-PKc may provide a novel strategy to restore taxane sensitivity in taxane-refractory mCRPC.

A long-term survivor of metastatic neuroendocrine prostate cancer treated with multimodal therapy: genetic consideration from next-generation sequencing

It is still unclear whether cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can replace solid-tissue biopsy. A 59-year-old man developed castration-resistant prostate cancer with a liver metastasis. We performed a liver biopsy and collected a cfDNA sample. Although he underwent radiofrequency ablation, tumors recurred and he was transferred to another hospital. We performed next-generation sequencing using DNA from the biopsy tissue and cfDNA. BRCA2 p.T3033fs and AURKA F31I were detected in both the biopsy tissue and the cfDNA. cfDNA may be useful as a liquid biopsy for monitoring the gene profile of aggressive prostate cancer.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13691-021-00482-2.

Activity and Adverse Events of Actinium-225-PSMA-617 in Advanced Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Failure of Lutetium-177-PSMA

BACKGROUND

Beta-emitting Lu-177-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) is a new option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but its antitumor effect can decrease over time.

OBJECTIVE

To report the safety and activity of alpha-emitting Ac-225-PSMA-617 RLT in mCRPC that has progressed after Lu-177-PSMA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six patients were treated under a compassionate use protocol. The eligibility criteria included previous treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide, previous taxane-based chemotherapy, progression after Lu-177-PSMA, and positive PSMA-ligand uptake. The median number of previous mCRPC regimens was 6. Ac-225-PSMA-617 was given every 8 wk until progression/intolerable side effects.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical progression-free survival (cPFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were measured.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Sixty-one cycles of Ac-225-PSMA-617 (median number of cycles 2; median activity 9 MBq) were administered. A PSA decline of ≥50% was achieved in 17/26 patients. The median PSA-PFS, cPFS, and OS periods were 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-11.2), 4.1 (95% CI 3-14.8), and 7.7 (95% CI 4.5-12.1) mo, respectively. Liver metastases were associated with shorter PSA-PFS (median 1.9 vs 4.0 mo; p = 0.02), cPFS (median 1.8 vs 5.2 mo; p = 0.001), and OS (median 4.3 vs 10.4 mo; p = 0.01). Hematological grade 3/4 toxicities were anemia (35%), leucopenia (27%), and thrombocytopenia (19%). All patients experienced grade 1/2 xerostomia. Two and six patients stopped due to hematological toxicity and xerostomia, respectively. A limitation is the retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Ac-225-PSMA-617 showed measurable antitumor effect after Lu-177-PSMA failure in late-stage mCRPC. Grade 3/4 hematological side effects were observed in up to one-third of patients, and xerostomia led to treatment halt in a relevant number of patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Ac-225-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 therapy showed substantial antitumor effect in late metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after Lu-177-PSMA failure. However, dry mouth is a common side effect that caused about a quarter of patients to stop therapy.

Etoposide Loaded SPION-PNIPAM Nanoparticles Improve the in vitro Therapeutic Outcome on Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells via Enhanced Apoptosis

Prostate cancer is among the leading causes of death worldwide because its metastatic form is a deadly disease. Therefore, the development of new chemotherapeutics is of immense importance. Nanoparticle technology seems to provide diverse options in this regard. Therefore, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) loaded with Etoposide were prepared in small sizes (57 nm) and with 3.5 % drug content to improve the efficiency of Etoposide in prostate cancer therapy. Sustained release of the drug was achieved, which found to be sensitive to low pH and high temperature. The anti-growth activity of SPION-PNIPAM-Etoposide formulation against metastatic prostate cancer cells (PC-3, LNCaP) were investigated by SRB assay, then, confirmed by ATP assay. Mode of cell death was evaluated by using flow cytometry analyses. A significant improvement of nanoformulated drug was observed at 5-10 μg/ml doses of the drug in both cell lines. More importantly, this formulation enhanced the cytotoxic effect of Etoposide on PC-3 cells, which is considered more resistant to Etoposide than LNCaP and reduced the IC₅₀ value by 55 % reaching to 4.5 μg drug/ml, which is a very significant improvement in the literature. It was clearly shown that nanoformulated drug provided about 3-fold increases in caspase-dependent early apoptotic cells in PC-3 cells. The novel formulation seems to successfully cause cell death of especially PC-3 metastatic prostate cancer cells. It should therefore be taken into consideration for further animal studies as a novel potent anticancer agent.

Resolution of Cellular Heterogeneity in Human Prostate Cancers: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment

Prostate cancers have a justified reputation as one of the most heterogeneous human tumours. Indeed, there are some who consider that advanced and castration-resistant prostate cancers are incurable, as a direct result of this heterogeneity. However, tumour heterogeneity can be defined in different ways. To a clinician, prostate cancer is a number of different diseases, the treatments for which remain equally heterogeneous and uncertain. To the pathologist, the histopathological appearances of the tumours are notoriously heterogeneous. Indeed, the genius of Donald Gleason in the 1960s was to devise a classification system designed to take into account the heterogeneity of the tumours both individually and in the whole prostate context. To the cell biologist, a prostate tumour consists of multiple epithelial cell types, inter-mingled with various fibroblasts, neuroendocrine cells, endothelial cells, macrophages and lymphocytes, all of which interact to influence treatment responses in a patient-specific manner. Finally, genetic analyses of prostate cancers have been compromised by the variable gene rearrangements and paucity of activating mutations observed, even in large numbers of patient tumours with consistent clinical diagnoses and/or outcomes. Research into familial susceptibility has even generated the least tractable outcome of such studies: the genetic loci are of low penetrance and are of course heterogeneous. By fractionating the tumour (and patient-matched non-malignant tissues) heterogeneity can be resolved, revealing homogeneous markers of patient outcomes.

Intravenous versus oral etoposide: efficacy and correlation to clinical outcome in patients with high-grade metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (WHO G3)

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs, G3) are aggressive cancers of the digestive system with poor prognosis and survival. Platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin/carboplatin + etoposide) is considered the first-line palliative treatment. Etoposide is frequently administered intravenously; however, oral etoposide may be used as an alternative. Concerns for oral etoposide include decreased bioavailability, inter- and intra-patient variability and patient compliance. We aimed to evaluate possible differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with oral etoposide compared to etoposide given as infusion. Patients (n = 236) from the Nordic NEC study were divided into three groups receiving etoposide as a long infusion (24 h, n = 170), short infusion (≤ 5 h, n = 33) or oral etoposide (n = 33) according to hospital tradition. PFS and OS were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier (log-rank), cox proportional hazard ratios and confidence intervals. No statistical differences were observed in PFS or OS when comparing patients receiving long infusion (median PFS 3.8 months, median OS 14.5 months), short infusion (PFS 5.6 months, OS 11.0 months) or oral etoposide (PFS 5.4 months, OS 11.3 months). We observed equal efficacy for the three administration routes suggesting oral etoposide may be safe and efficient in treating high-grade GEP-NEN, G3 patients scheduled for cisplatin/carboplatin + etoposide therapy.