Severe ileitis associated with capecitabine: Two case reports and review of the literature

Capecitabine-Induced Ileitis during Neoadjuvant Pelvic Radio-Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Case Report with Literature Review

We report on a clinical case of capecitabine-induced acute ileitis in a patient treated with pre-operative concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer and provide a comprehensive literature review. This a rare, but life-threatening, clinical situation, that clinicians should be aware of. Severe persistent diarrhea is the most frequent clinical feature and computed tomography is a valid tool for diagnosis. Conservative management includes capecitabine withdrawal, antidiarrheal therapy and endovenous hydration, together with dietary modifications and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Pelvic irradiation represents an adjunctive risk factor, which may increase the likelihood of occurrence of terminal ileitis. Early recognition and prompt intervention are crucial for successful clinical management.

Capecitabine-induced Gastrointestinal Injury Shows a Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)-like Pattern

Capecitabine is a commonly used oral chemotherapeutic agent. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects are clinically well-known, however, the histopathologic changes have not been comprehensively studied. This study describes the largest case series (8 patients) characterizing the histopathology of capecitabine-induced GI injury. All patients were adults (median age: 64.5 y, range: 61 to 76 y) and there was gender parity. Patients were receiving treatment for malignancies of the colorectum (n=5), breast (n=1), pancreas (n=1), and appendix (n=1). All had GI symptoms, including 7 with diarrhea and abdominal pain and 1 with melena. Five of 8 (63%) showed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-like histologic changes in small intestinal and/or colonic biopsies characterized by crypt disarray and dropout, crypt atrophy, dilated crypts lined by attenuated epithelium, and increased crypt apoptosis. Neuroendocrine cell aggregates were present in 4 of 5 cases. Four of 5 showed patchy prominence in lamina propria eosinophils. One patient receiving concomitant radiation therapy had a small intestinal biopsy showing regenerative changes. Two patients had histologically unremarkable biopsies. On follow-up, capecitabine was discontinued or dose-reduced in all patients. Three of 5 patients with a GVHD-like pattern had clinical improvement, whereas 2 died shortly after biopsy. One with regenerative changes also had radiation dose reduction and improved clinically. Two with unremarkable biopsies improved symptomatically. In summary, capecitabine-related GI injury shows a GVHD-like pattern. Knowledge of this is important to confirm the diagnosis as patients typically improve with dose reduction or discontinuation of the drug.

Chemotherapy-induced ileitis associated or not with colitis in digestive oncology patients: An AGEO multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The characteristics and management of ileitis induced by chemotherapy in cancer patients are poorly described in the literature.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study enroled patients hospitalized in a digestive oncology unit for a symptomatic chemotherapy-induced ileitis.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included, with a regimen based on fluoropyrimidine and/or irinotecan in 95% of cases. Five patients were excluded due to the diagnosis of infectious ileitis (Clostridium difficile in 3 patients, Campylobacter jejuni in 1 patient and cytomegalovirus in 1 patient). The most frequently described symptoms were diarrhoea (77% including 54% of grade 3-4 diarrhoea), abdominal pain (58%), fever (51%) and vomiting (56%). An ileo-colonoscopy was performed in 35% of patients and did not show any specific results or severity criteria. The ileitis was complicated by bowel perforation and/or obstruction in 3 patients. Disease progression was favourable in 1-2 weeks in the vast majority of cases, on symptomatic treatment, allowing resumption of the chemotherapy regimen involved in 67% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy-induced ileitis is a rare complication that most often involves fluoropyri-midine- and/or irinotecan-based regimens. In most cases, endoscopic examinations were not contributory and do not seem useful in the event of non-severe symptomatology which most often develops favourably on symptomatic therapy, allowing resumption of the chemotherapy involved.

Capecitabine-associated enterocolitis: Narrative literature review of a rare adverse event and a case presentation

Capecitabine is an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug with antimetabolite activity commonly used in advanced colorectal and breast cancer. It presents with a generally good toxicity profile and most of the adverse events can be managed effectively. Enterocolitis is a rare, under-reported, but potentially fatal adverse event associated with capecitabine use. To the best of our knowledge, there are 21 cases of capecitabine-related enterocolitis reported in the literature. We herein present a narrative literature review of enteritis/colitis cases associated with capecitabine use, with highlight to the most common clinical presentation, common imaging and microscopic findings and management approach. We furthermore present a case of severe capecitabine-related enteritis.

Severe ileum bleeding following adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy for locally advanced colon cancer: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is a prodrug that is enzymatically converted to its active form, fluorouracil (also called 5-fluorouracil), which is commonly used as adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients. Severe gastrointestinal bleeding induced by capecitabine is rare. Here, we are presenting the first case report of surgery specimen assisted diagnosis of this uncommon condition.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old Chinese male with a history of colon adenocarcinoma and right hemicolectomy presented with severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding 2 days after finishing capecitabine administration during the first cycle of XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy. Because of the negative findings of active bleeding points by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or colonoscopy, emergency laparotomy and partial enterectomy were performed. The bloody diarrhea had resolved after surgery and a terminal ileitis was diagnosed after pathological examination of the surgical specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Terminal ileitis induced by capecitabine is likely to be underreported. It should be considered more often as a cause of severe gastrointestinal bleeding during or after treatment with capecitabine agents. Emergency surgery may achieve satisfactory outcomes if endoscopic hemostasis is ineffective.

HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS CASE

1. Gastrointestinal bleeding following capecitabine treatment in colorectal cancer patients might be life-threatening. 2. Terminal ileitis induced by capecitabine should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of severe gastrointestinal bleeding. 3. Awareness of the risk factors such as deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, advanced age, or right colectomy may aid in reducing capecitabine-related morbidity. 4. When severe bleeding occurs, emergency surgery may achieve satisfactory outcomes if medical and endoscopic interventions are ineffective.

Capecitabine-Induced Terminal Ileitis: Case Report and Literature Review

Capecitabine is a well-established agent for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast and colorectal cancers. However, one of the limiting adverse events of this therapy is severe diarrhea, which is reported with increasing frequency as of late. Capecitabine-induced ileitis should be suspected in cases with severe, treatment-refractory diarrhea. We present a case of capecitabine-induced terminal ileitis in a patient who received the medication as adjuvant therapy for previously resected colon adenocarcinoma. Capecitabine-induced diarrhea secondary to ileitis is a severe adverse drug event, which occurs during adjuvant chemotherapy and does not respond to conservative treatment with antidiarrheals, often necessitating permanent drug withdrawal. A high index of suspicion is critical as the complications, such as dehydration and the associated electrolyte derangements, may be life-threatening if diagnosis and cause-specific treatment are delayed.

The FOCCUS study: a prospective evaluation of the frequency, severity and treatable causes of gastrointestinal symptoms during and after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The underlying mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are poorly researched. This study characterised the nature, frequency, severity and treatable causes for GI symptoms prospectively in patients undergoing chemotherapy for GI malignancy.

METHODS

Patients receiving chemotherapy for a GI malignancy were assessed pre-chemotherapy, then monthly for 1 year using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, a validated patient-reported outcome measure. Patients with new, troublesome GI symptoms were offered investigations to diagnose the cause(s). Their oncologist was alerted when investigations were abnormal.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients, 60% male, median age 63 years (range 30-88), were enrolled; 122 patients were withdrawn, 93%, because of progressive disease or death. During the study, > 20% patients reported chronic faecal incontinence and > 10% reported moderate or severe problems with taste, dysphagia, belching, heartburn, early satiety, appetite, nausea, abdominal cramps, peri-rectal pain, rectal flatulence, borborygmi, urgency of defecation or tenesmus. Thirty percent reported continuing passage of hard stools and 30% on-going diarrhoea. Moderate or severe fatigue affected 40% participants at its peak and persisted in 15% at 1 year. Toxicity dictated change in chemotherapy for 13-29% patients/month. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events underestimated gastrointestinal morbidity. Pre-chemotherapy screening identified previously undiagnosed pathology: exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (9%), vitamin B12 deficiency (12%) and thyroid dysfunction (20%). Patients often refused investigations to diagnose their chemotherapy-induced symptoms; however, for every three investigations performed, one treatable cause was diagnosed: particularly small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (54%), bile acid malabsorption (43%), previously not described after chemotherapy, and unsuspected urinary tract infection (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing chemotherapy for GI malignancy commonly have difficult GI symptoms requiring active management which does not occur routinely. The underlying causes for these symptoms are often treatable or curable. Randomised trials are urgently needed to show whether timely investigation and treatment of symptoms improve quality of life and survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02121626.

Drug-Induced Small Bowel Injury: a Challenging and Often Forgotten Clinical Condition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Most drugs are given by the oral route. Oral intake allows direct contact between the drug and the entire GI tract mucosa, exposing it to potential topical damage until absorption. Medication-induced GI symptoms and lesions are therefore commonly encountered in clinical practice. This review will examine the most common drugs or classes of drugs affecting small bowel function and/or structure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used medicines, NSAID enteropathy is highly prevalent and brings about considerable morbidity. Antimicrobials and proton-pump inhibitors profoundly modify intestinal microbiota, affecting gut sensory and motor functions, while other drugs (like iron and gold derivatives) impair intestinal permeability. Olmesartan (and likely ACE inhibitors) induce villous atrophy and consequent malabsorption. Mycophenolate mofetil, cancer chemotherapeutic agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors cause intestinal inflammation, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Potassium chloride supplements may induce small bowel ulceration, stenosis, and perforation while the cotraceptive pill and anticoagulants are associated with intestinal ischemia and spontaneous intramural hematoma, respectively. In clinical practice, a deep knowledge of clinical pharmacology and toxicology and a high degree of suspicion of drug-related adverse events are mandatory. Only then, the practicing physician will be able to diagnose medication-induced small bowel lesions correctly and will implement the best strategies to treat them.

A Case of Pneumatosis Intestinalis With Pneumoperitoneum as a Potential Delayed Adverse Effect of Capecitabine

Ileitis and colitis are known complications of capecitabine when used in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. However, to our knowledge, pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) has not previously been reported with this medication. We present a patient with breast cancer, without any metastases to the gastrointestinal tract, who presented with persistent diarrhea 4 weeks after discontinuing adjuvant capecitabine, which was found to be due to PI. As she had no other risk factors or identifiable causes, her PI was attributed to a delayed reaction to capecitabine. This case highlights the need to consider PI earlier in the differential diagnosis in patients with breast cancer who present with unexplained diarrhea after recent discontinuation of capecitabine.

Role of colonoscopy in diagnosis of capecitabine associated ileitis: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is considered a first line agent in adjuvant therapy for breast and colorectal cancer. However, cases of severe diarrhea have been reported with increasing frequency in recent years. When diarrhea is severe and prolonged, capecitabine associated ileitis should be considered as a possible etiology.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we present two cases of capecitabine ileitis, specifically involving the terminal ileum and ascending colon. We will demonstrate the disease course and treatment modalities applied to alleviate this condition, as well as discuss the merits of using colonoscopy to aid in diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Ultimately our cases demonstrate that symptomatic management with traditional anti-diarrheal medications is largely ineffective. Prompt recognition and discontinuation of capecitabine is an imperative step in proper management of this condition and colonoscopy with biopsy can be helpful when the diagnosis is unclear.

Capecitabine-Associated Terminal Ileitis

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine used as adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Diarrhea is a well-known side effect of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil agents. We present a case with terminal ileitis as a rare adverse event of capecitabine treatment. Capecitabine-induced terminal ileitis is likely to be underreported. It should be considered more often as a cause of severe and atypical complaints of diarrhea during treatment with capecitabine or other 5-fluorouracil agents.

Small Bowel Lesions Mimicking Crohn's Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Not all injuries of the terminal ileum are Crohn's disease. It is the purpose of this review to consider the differential diagnosis of other acute and chronic ileal lesions.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recognition of a granulomatous disease of the terminal ileum, distinct from tuberculosis, dates back over 85 years and perhaps much farther, but over the past decades, many other clinical pathologic entities have been described that are neither tuberculosis nor Crohn's eponymous regional enteritis. In recent years, the catalog of lesions mimicking Crohn's disease of the small bowel and proposals for differential diagnosis and treatment have expanded to include newly reported appendiceal pathology, primary cancers and lymphomas of the intestine, unexpected metastases from distant organs, unusual infections, vasculitides and other ischemic conditions, Behçet's disease, endometriosis, and drug reactions. A diagnosis of Crohn's disease should not be a reflex action in the face of small bowel structural or inflammatory lesions without consideration of pathology in adjacent organs, primary and metastatic lesions of the small intestine, infections, vascular diseases, infiltrative diseases, drug injury, or other "idiopathic" conditions.