Differences in IP‑10, TLR4 and IRF5/3 between SVR and non‑SVR HCV‑1 patients treated with PEG‑IFN and ribavirin

Assessment and Comparison of Two Serological Approaches for the Surveillance of Health Workers Exposed to SARS-CoV-2

Background and Aim

The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic performance of an LFA compared with an ELISA test in a cohort of HWs operating in a COVID-19 unit of a teaching hospital in southern Italy.

Methods

We performed an observational, prospective, interventional study including 65 COVID-19 unit personnel. On a total of 196 serum samples (at least 2 serum samples for each HW), LFA and ELISA tests for SARS-COV-2 IgG and IgM were performed. Also, 32 serum samples of SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive patients at least 21 days before sampling, and 30 serum samples of patients obtained up to November 2019, before COVID-19 outbreak in China, were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Findings

Of the 65 HWs enrolled, 6 were positive in LFA; overall, of the 196 serum samples, 20 were positive in LFA. All ELISA tests performed on serum samples collected from HWs were negative. The specificity of LFAs was 90.77% considering the 65 HWs and 89.80% considering all the 196 health workers serum samples analyzed. Considering the data on HWs, ELISA test for SARS-COV-2 antibodies showed a specificity of 100%, including all the 196 serum samples collected, and 100% including the 65 HWs. The ELISA and LFAs performed after 21 days last COVID-19 patient was discharged were all negative.

Conclusion

LFAs compared to ELISA tests result in less specificity, considering COVID-19 negative personnel and patients. Thus, LFAs seem to be not adequate in the active surveillance of HWs.

A promising role of interferon regulatory factor 5 as an early warning biomarker for the development of human non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85%-90% of lung cancer cases and is a covert disease lacking early symptoms. Since cancer is recognised as an inflammation-associated condition, we analysed the relationship between the expression of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), a key transcription factor controlling inflammatory responses, and NSCLC development with the aim of identifying a warning biomarker for early diagnosis of the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The expression of IRF5 and its associated inflammatory factors IL-6, IL-10, IP-10, and TNF-α in the peripheral blood of NSCLC patients (n = 66) and healthy controls (n = 42) was analysed by quantitative RT-PCR, flow cytometry, and a cytometric bead array. IRF5 protein expression in NSCLC tissues (n = 102) was detected by Western blotting. The diagnostic value of IRF5 expression was determined by a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The protein levels of IRF5, IL-6, and IP-10 were significantly higher in the peripheral blood of NSCLC patients than in that of healthy controls. IP-10 levels in plasma and IL-10 mRNA expression in white blood cells (WBCs) were significantly upregulated in early-stage NSCLC, whereas plasma IL-6 and IL-10 were elevated in the progressive stage. IRF5 protein levels in WBCs were positively correlated with plasma IP-10 but negatively correlated with plasma IL-10. Furthermore, the mRNA and protein levels of IRF5 in WBCs were significantly elevated in patients with early stage NSCLC compared to those in the progressive stage. Additionally, IRF5 protein levels were significantly lower in NSCLC tumour tissues than those in normal lung tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

IRF5 levels in WBCs can be significantly upregulated in early stage NSCLC and were shown to have diagnostic value as an early warning biomarker of NSCLC development.