Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: A case report and review of the literature

Alpha-Fetoprotein-Producing Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare type of gastric cancer with unique clinicopathological features. HAS has a poor prognosis because of early liver, lung, and lymph node metastasis. Owing to its rarity and malignant potential, data on its pathophysiology and management are scarce. Herein, we describe a case of alpha-fetoprotein-producing HAS (AFP-HAS) with metastases to the liver, lungs, and spine. The patient presented with a 3-month history of epigastric pain and intractable emesis, initially thought to be gastroparesis given her uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) of the abdomen and pelvis revealed thickening of the gastric wall with hepatic metastases. Upper endoscopy revealed a fungating gastric mass, and the histopathology confirmed AFP-HAS. The patient did not tolerate palliative chemotherapy and died 6 months after her gastric cancer diagnosis.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach effectively treated with capecitabine with oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric carcinoma (GC) with a hepatocellular carcinoma-like histology. HAS is a relatively rare type of GC, with liver metastases being more common than peritoneal dissemination in the recurrent form, and the poor prognosis.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We present the case of a 70-year-old patient who underwent distal gastrectomy for GC and immunohistologically diagnosed as HAS. The patient had an intravenous tumor thrombus at the proximal margin of the resected stomach. Owing to the low possibility of radical resection and high probability of liver metastatic recurrence, capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CapeOX) was started as adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). After three courses of CapeOX, oxaliplatin was discontinued due to adverse events (peripheral neuropathy, grade3) and capecitabine alone was continued for 3 years postoperatively. Six years after surgery, no local recurrence or distant metastasis was detected on imaging studies.

DISCUSSION

There is no established standard treatment for HAS. Recently, some studies have reported the efficacy of antimetabolites or platinum-based drugs as AC regimens. We thus decided to start a regimen consisting of a combination of antimetabolites and a platinum, i.e., CapeOX, which proved efficacious.

CONCLUSION

CapeOX or capecitabine may be effective as AC for treating HAS.

Emphasis on the clinical relationship between alpha-fetoprotein and hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a highly malignant and rare extrahepatic tumor. The prognosis is controversial because of its rarity and the lack of multi-center cohort studies, especially on the influence of serum Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level on prognosis. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HAS, particularly the effect of serum AFP on the prognosis of HAS.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of one HAS patient treated at our institution in 2019 and of 252 patients reported between 1984 and 2020 in research databases.

RESULTS

Among these patients, 60.1% were > 60 years, 51% had lesions in the gastric antrum, and 51.0% (73/143) had the ulcerative lesion type. The preoperative elevated levels of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were detected in most patients (76.7%). Lymph-node (84.6%) and preoperative liver metastasis (39.1%) were often found. The high-AFP group was characterized by a higher rate of stage IV (P = 0.000682) and liver metastasis (P = 0.000068). The 1-, 3-and 5-year progression-free survival(PFS) rates were 41%, 18%, and 0%, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 64%, 26%, and 21%, respectively. The survival analysis showed that OS was significantly shorter for HAS with high-AFP (> 300 ng/ml) than with low-AFP (≤ 300 ng/ml) (P = 0.023). The univariate analysis indicated that the OS of HAS was associated with tumor location, pTNM stage, lymph-node metastasis, surgical resection, and serum AFP > 300 ng/ml. However,the prognostic factors for PFS was only pTNM stage and surgical resection. The multivariate analysis confirmed that the independent prognostic factor affecting OS of HAS included pTNM stage and surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver metastasis was increasingly more likely with increasingly higher serum AFP, but the prognosis of HAS is not necessarily poor. Serum AFP level is an important prognostic indicator in HAS and should be monitored.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: CT findings

Objective

To analyze the CT findings of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and improve the diagnosis accuracy of this condition.

Methods

The CT images of 22 pathologically confirmed HAS patients were analyzed retrospectively. We investigated the location of lesions, morphology, enhancement features, area of invasion into surrounding organs, lymph node metastasis, and venous tumor thrombus.

Results

Among the 22 patients (17 men and 5 women, the mean age was 61.41 ± 9.83 years ranging from 36 to 80 years) with HAS; the morphology of tumors included mass (n = 5), focal ulcer (n = 7), and infiltrating ulcer (n = 10). Extraserous fat was invaded in 12 cases. Enhancement scans showed continuous enhancement in all cases. The CT values of unenhanced scan, the arterial phase, and the portal venous phase are 30.36 ± 6.46, 60.91 ± 17.80, and 75.64 ± 22.09 (Hounsfield Unit, HU), respectively. In six cases, the tumor infiltrated the surrounding organs: liver (n = 1), pancreas (n = 2), and both liver and pancreas (n = 3). In 16 out of 22 patients (72.3%), suspicious lymph node metastasis at CT imaging has then been confirmed by pathological specimens. Intrahepatic metastasis was found in 14 cases. Seven patients had venous tumor thrombus: three patients developed tumor thrombus in the main trunk and intrahepatic branches of the portal vein and two patients in the portal vein, splenic vein, and superior mesenteric vein simultaneously.

Conclusion

The CT scans of HAS often show a thickened gastric wall and infiltrating ulceration. Infiltration into extraserosal fat is often seen. Enhancement scans show a continuous and progressive enhancement of lesions. Lymph node metastasis, intrahepatic metastasis, and portal vein tumor thrombus are common in HAS patients.

CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiating gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma from gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

To develop a CT-based radiomics nomogram for the high-precision preoperative differentiation of gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (GHAC) patients from gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

108 patients with GHAC from 6 centers and 108 GAC patients matched by age, sex and T stage undergoing pathological examination were retrospectively reviewed. Patients from 5 centers were divided into two cohorts (training and internal validation) at a 7:3 ratio, the remaining patients were external test cohort. Venous-phase CT images were retrieved for tumor segmentation and feature extraction. A radiomics model was developed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. The nomogram was developed by clinical factors and the radiomics score.

RESULTS

1409 features were extracted and a radiomics model consisting of 19 features was developed, which showed a favorable performance in discriminating GHAC from GAC (AUC_{training cohort} = 0.998, AUC_{internal validation set} = 0.942, AUC_{external test cohort} = 0.731). The radiomics nomogram, including the radiomics score, AFP, and CA72_4, achieved good calibration and discrimination (AUC_{training cohort} = 0.998, AUC_{internal validation set} = 0.954, AUC_{external test cohort} = 0.909).

CONCLUSIONS

The noninvasive CT-based nomogram, including radiomics score, AFP, and CA72_4, showed favorable predictive efficacy for differentiating GHAC from GAC and might be useful for clinical decision-making.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Current Perspectives and New Developments

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare malignant tumor, accounting for only 0.17-15% of gastric cancers. Patients are often diagnosed at an advanced disease stage, and their symptoms are similar to conventional gastric cancer (CGC) without specific clinical manifestation. Morphologically, HAC has identical morphology and immunophenotype compared to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This is considered to be an underestimation in diagnosis due to its rare incidence, and no consensus is reached regarding therapy. HAS generally presents with more aggressive behavior and worse prognosis than CGC. The present review summarizes the current literature and relevant knowledge to elaborate on the epidemic, potential mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prognosis to help clinicians accurately diagnose and treat this malignant tumor.

The prognosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a propensity score-based analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether there is a distinct difference in prognosis between hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and non-hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (non-HAS) and whether HAS can benefit from radical surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 722 patients with non-HAS and 75 patients with HAS who underwent radical gastrectomy between 3 November 2009 and 17 December 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to eliminate the bias among the patients in our study. The relationships between gastric cancer type and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Our data demonstrate that there was no statistically significant difference in the OS between HAS and non-HAS {K-M, P = log rank (Mantel-Cox), (before PSM P = 0.397); (1:1 PSM P = 0.345); (1:2 PSM P = 0.195)}. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the 1-, 2-, or 3-year survival rates between patients with non-HAS and patients with HAS (before propensity matching, after 1:1 propensity matching, and after 1:2 propensity matching).

CONCLUSION

HAS was generally considered to be an aggressive gastric neoplasm, but its prognosis may not be as unsatisfactory as previously believed.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is an extremely rare and unique gastric malignancy. The present study aimed to examine the relevance of the clinicopathological characteristics of HAS with patient prognosis. We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 34 HAS patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2016, as well as 294 cases reported prior to 2017 in research databases. Among these patients, 45.6% (115/252) had lesions in the gastric antrum and 77.0% (235/305) were male. Elevated levels of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were detected in most patients (75/93, 80.6%). Vascular invasion (199/286, 69.6%), lymph node metastasis (222/283, 78.4%), and preoperative distant metastasis (121/328, 36.9%) were commonly observed. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 20.7% and 29.2%, respectively. DFS and DSS of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were significantly higher than those of patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy [DFS: P<0.001, hazard ratio (HR)=-1.831, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.060-0.429; DSS: P<0.001, HR=-2.185, 95% CI: 0.032-0.401]. In conclusion, HAS exhibits distinct clinicopathological characteristics and a strikingly worse prognosis when compared with common gastric cancer. Complete surgery, early pTNM stage, and adjuvant therapy may predict a more favorable prognosis. Neoadjuvant therapy is strongly recommended for patients with lymph node metastasis or/and preoperative distant metastasis.

Uterine Carcinosarcoma with Alpha-Fetoprotein-Producing Hepatoid Component: A Case Report and Literature Review

A 67-year-old woman presented with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Full body imaging demonstrated an intrauterine mass with deep myometrial invasion but no nodal or other metastatic disease. Uterine curettage was performed. Histologically, the tumor was an endometrioid adenocarcinoma with sarcomatous element and a hepatoid component, the latter was immunohistochemically positive for alpha-fetoprotein, HepPar-1, and arginase-1. The patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Serum alpha-fetoprotein level decreased from 31896 ug/l preoperatively to 2063 ug/l postoperatively. Eight weeks later, a rise in serum alpha-fetoprotein was detected, and a biopsy-proven vaginal recurrence was diagnosed. Palliative chemotherapy led to tumor shrinkage and a concurrent decrease in the serum alpha-fetoprotein level. A rise in serum alpha-fetoprotein, refractory to second-line chemotherapy, was accompanied by subsequent development of ureteric obstruction, ascites, and radiological evidence of peritoneal metastases. This is an unusual case of uterine carcinosarcoma with an alpha-fetoprotein-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma component. Serum alpha-fetoprotein level corresponds to disease recurrence and progression.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of α-fetoprotein positive and negative hepatoid adenocarcinomas of the intestinal tract

AIM

To explore the clinical and pathological characteristics of α-fetoprotein (AFP) positive and negative hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) of the intestinal tract.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of three cases of HAC of the intestinal tract diagnosed at Xijing Hospital from January 2010 to July 2016. The clinical symptoms of patients were recorded. Serum tumor markers were tested by electrochemical luminescence. Imaging examinations of liver and lung metastases were performed. Carcinoma tissues were subjected to pathological and immunohistochemical analyses. Postoperative pathological characteristics and prognosis were assessed.

RESULTS

Before treatment, AFP was highly positive in one case with liver metastasis. All three cases underwent surgical treatment, and pathological staging suggested stage 3 in two cases and stage 4 in one case. Lymph node metastasis was detected in two cases. Vascular and nerve invasion was found in all cases by immunohistochemistry. Tumors consisted of glandular and hepatoid components. Eosinophilic vitreous bodies were found in the cytoplasm of some tumor cells. One patient died, and two cases survived between 2 and 16 mo.

CONCLUSION

HAC patients have no specific symptoms, but have clinicopathological features and immune phenotype. HAC should be differentiated from hepatocellular carcinoma and yolk sac tumors. Although a diagnosis of HAC cannot be achieved by AFP, AFP may be able to help predict the biological behavior, metastasis and recurrences of HAC; AFP negative patients may have better prognosis than positive ones.