Improved laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma based on the precise anatomy of the nephron

Acute kidney injury after nephron sparing surgery and microwave ablation: focus on incidence, survival impact and prediction

Purpose: To compare acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence between nephron sparing surgery (NSS) and microwave ablation (MWA) for T1a RCC patients, reveal the effect of AKI on survival prognosis, construct AKI nomogram and use Law of Total Probability for survival probability (SP) prediction.Materials and methods: Patients were studied retrospectively after NSS (n = 1267) or MWA (n = 210) from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2017. Using one to one Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 158 pairs of patients were identified for the cohort study. AKI incidence, risk factors and impact on survival outcomes were analyzed using Chi-square test, logistic and cox regression analysis. AKI risk and SP were predicted by nomogram and Law of Total Probability. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.Results: AKI occurred more commonly in NSS (27.85%) cohort, when compared to MWA (17.72%) cohort (p = 0.032), but treatment modality was not independently predictive of AKI occurrence (odds ratio [OR]: 0.598; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.282-1.265; p = 0.178). The 5-yr overall survival (OS) was lower in AKI patients (73.5%) compared with non-AKI patients (94.8%; p < 0.001). AKI was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in RCC patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.820; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.110-7.165; p = 0.029). Predictors for both NSS- and MWA-related AKI included tumor diameter, baseline eGFR and CCI score. RENAL score and tumor blood supply can predict AKI after NSS and MWA, respectively. The AKI normograms demonstrated good discrimination, with AUCs >0.86, excellent calibration and net benefits at the decision curve analysis with probabilities ≥5%. SP predicted by Law of Total Probability was comparable to actual OS.Conclusion: AKI was an early indicator for poor overall survival in RCC patients. It can be predicted by several oncological parameters. Nomogram and Law of Total Probability can accurately predict AKI risk and SP.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for cT1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study of 1955 Patients

Background Percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) are two modalities indicated for early-stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with low extent of invasion. Purpose To compare the long-term results of percutaneous MWA and LPN in the treatment of cT1a RCC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 1955 patients with cT1a RCC treated with percutaneous MWA or LPN between April 2006 and November 2017. Propensity score matching was used. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed by using the Fine-and-Gray competing risk models. Results A total of 185 patients underwent percutaneous MWA (mean age, 63.2 years ± 15.2 [standard deviation]) and 1770 underwent LPN (mean age, 50.9 years ± 13.2). During the follow-up (median, 40.6 months), after propensity score matching, no difference was observed between local tumor progression (3.2% vs 0.5%, P = .10), cancer-specific survival (2.2% vs 3.8%, P = .24), and distant metastases (4.3% vs 4.3%, P = .76). Patients who underwent percutaneous MWA had worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 5.7; P = .049 vs LPN) and disease-free survival (82.9% vs 91.4%, P = .003). Percutaneous MWA led to smaller drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge (6.2% vs 16.4%, P < .001), smaller estimated blood loss (4.5 mL ± 1.3 vs 54.2 mL ± 69.2), lower cost ($3150 ± 2970 vs $6045 ± 1860 U.S. dollars), shorter operative time (0.5 minute ± 0.1 vs 1.8 minutes ± 0.6), and shorter postoperative hospitalization time (5.1 days ± 2.6 vs 6.9 days ± 2.8) (all P < .001 vs LPN). There were fewer cases of fever in the percutaneous MWA group (16.2% vs 73.0%, P < .001). Conclusion There were no significant differences regarding oncologic outcomes and complications between percutaneous microwave ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for patients with cT1a renal cell carcinoma. Percutaneous microwave ablation led to smaller renal function change and lower blood loss. For patients who cannot be subjected to the risks of more invasive laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, percutaneous microwave ablation could be an alternative less invasive treatment option. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The correlation between affected renal function and affected renal residual volume: A retrospective outcome of laparoscopic nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery blocking-up for localized renal tumors

Laparoscopic nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery blocking (SRPN) has been widely used in the treatment of localized renal tumors. However, the impact of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during SRPN remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between affected renal function and affected renal volume after SRPN for localized renal tumor treatment, explore the effect of IRI on renal function after SRPN.A total of 39 patients who underwent SRPN for localized renal tumor from June 2009 to April 2012 were reviewed. These patients were followed-up for 5 years. The preoperative affected renal glomerular filtration rate (aGFRpre), postoperative affected renal glomerular filtration rate (aGFRpost), preoperative affected renal volume (aVolpre), and postoperative affected renal volume (aVolpost) were collected during the follow-up period. The correlation between aGFRpost/aGFRpre and aVolpost/aVolpre was compared.A total of 33 patients were successfully followed up. After 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months, aGFRpost was 34.6 ± 4.6, 34.7 ± 4.8, 34.9 ± 4.4, 35.1 ± 4.4, and 35.2 ± 4.2 mL/min. The correlation coefficients between aGFRpost/aGFRpre and aVolpost/aVolpre were 0.659 (P = .000), 0.667 (P = .000), 0.663 (P = .000), 0.629 (P = .000), and 0.604 (P = .000), respectively. The limitation of this study was the small cohort size.For the localized renal tumor, aGFRpost was associated with aVolpost, but was not associated with intraoperative factors, such as the time of clamping of the affected segmental renal artery. As a part of nephrons, the resected tumor tissue caused the lack of inherent nephrons, resulting in the loss of renal function. More nephrons should be maintained before resecting the tumor completely during SRPN.Trial registration: ChiCTR-RRC-17011418.