Prognostic relevance of FGFR2 expression in stage II/III gastric cancer with curative resection and S-1 chemotherapy

Exploring the Influence of T Cell Marker Gene Expression on the Pathobiology and Clinical Prognostic Outcomes in Intestinal-Type Gastric Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) poses a significant global health challenge. This study is aimed at elucidating the role of the immune system, particularly T cells and their subtypes, in the pathogenesis and progression of intestinal-type gastric carcinoma (GC), and at evaluating the predictive utility of a T cell marker gene-based risk score for overall survival.

METHODS

We performed an extensive analysis using single-cell RNA sequencing data to map the diversity of immune cells and identify specific T cell marker genes within GC. Pseudotime trajectory analysis was employed to observe the expression patterns of tumor-related pathways and transcription factors (TFs) at various disease stages. We developed a risk score using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as a training set and validated it with the GSE15459 dataset.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed distinct patterns of T cell marker gene expression associated with different stages of GC. The risk score, based on these markers, successfully stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with significantly different overall survival prospects. High-risk patients exhibited poorer survival outcomes compared to low-risk patients (p < 0.05). Additionally, the risk score was capable of identifying patients across a spectrum from chronic atrophic gastritis to early GC.

CONCLUSION

The findings enhance the understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment in GC and propose new immunotherapeutic targets. The T cell marker gene-based risk score offers a potential tool for gastroenterologists to tailor treatment plans more precisely according to the cancer's severity.

Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer

Predictive biomarkers are the mainstay of precision medicine. This review summarizes the advancements in tissue-based diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer, which is considered the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. A disease seen in the elderly, it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, thereby limiting therapeutic options. In Western countries, neoadjuvant/perioperative (radio-)chemotherapy is administered, and adjuvant chemotherapy is administered in the East. The morpho-molecular classification of gastric cancer has opened novel avenues identifying Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV)-positive, microsatellite instable, genomically stable and chromosomal instable gastric cancers. In chromosomal instable tumors, receptor tyrosine kinases (RKTs) (e.g., EGFR, FGFR2, HER2, and MET) are frequently overexpressed. Gastric cancers such as microsatellite instable and EBV-positive types often express immune checkpoint molecules, such as PD-L1 and VISTA. Genomically stable tumors show alterations in claudin 18.2. Next-generation sequencing is increasingly being used to search for druggable targets in advanced palliative settings. However, most tissue-based biomarkers of gastric cancer carry the risk of a sampling error due to intratumoral heterogeneity, and adequate tissue sampling is of paramount importance.

Phase I study of the irreversible fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4 inhibitor futibatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

This phase I study was designed to: (1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor futibatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors, and (2) examine the antitumor activity of the RD in patients with gastric cancer (GC) or other advanced solid tumors who have FGFR or FGF/FGFR abnormalities, respectively. In the dose-escalation phase, patients were assigned to 21-day cycles of oral futibatinib 8-160 mg three times a week (TIW) or 16 or 20 mg once daily (QD). In the expansion phase, patients received oral futibatinib 56, 80, or 120 mg TIW, or 16 or 20 mg QD. Eighty-three patients received futibatinib TIW (n = 40) or QD (n = 43). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed according to the final study protocol definition, and the MTD was not reached. The most common adverse events with both regimens were hyperphosphatemia (TIW, 82.5%; QD, 100.0%) and decreased appetite (TIW, 40.0%; QD, 58.1%). Hyperphosphatemia was asymptomatic, not leading to futibatinib discontinuation. The overall response rate (ORR) was 11.5% in patients with FGF/FGFR abnormalities. Notably, in GC patients harboring FGFR2 copy number (CN) ≥10, the ORR was 36.4% versus 0 in patients with CN <10. Therefore, futibatinib had a generally predictable and manageable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors. Antitumor activity was seen in patients with FGF/FGFR abnormalities, particularly those with GC and high FGFR2 CNs. Thus, futibatinib 20 mg QD was chosen as the RD for phase II studies.

Insights into the Relationship between Pentraxin-3 and Cancer

Although cancer can be cured if detected early and treated effectively, it is still a leading cause of death worldwide. Tumor development can be limited by an appropiate immune response, but it can be promoted by chronic extensive inflammation through metabolic dysregulation and angiogenesis. In the past decade, numerous efforts have been made in order to identify novel candidates with predictive values in cancer diagnostics. In line with this, researchers have investigated the involvement of pentraxin-3 (PTX-3) in cellular proliferation and immune escape in various types of cancers, although it has not been clearly elucidated. PTX-3 is a member of the long pentraxin subfamily which plays an important role in regulating inflammation, innate immunity response, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling. Increased synthesis of inflammatory biomarkers and activation of different cellular mechanisms can induce PTX-3 expression in various types of cells (neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, myeloid dendritic cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells). PTX-3 has both pro- and anti-tumor functions, thus dual functions in oncogenesis. This review elucidates the potential usefulness of PTX-3 as a serum biomarker in cancer. While future investigations are needed, PTX-3 is emerging as a promising tool for cancer's diagnosis and prognosis, and also treatment monitoring.

A novel small molecule RK-019 inhibits FGFR2-amplification gastric cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in vitro and in vivo

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most malignant cancers and is estimated to be fifth in incidence ratio and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite advances in GC treatment, poor prognosis and low survival rate necessitate the development of novel treatment options. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) have been suggested to be potential targets for GC treatment. In this study, we report a novel selective FGFR inhibitor, RK-019, with a pyrido [1, 2-a] pyrimidinone skeleton. In vitro, RK-019 showed excellent FGFR1-4 inhibitory activities and strong anti-proliferative effects against FGFR2-amplification (FGFR2-amp) GC cells, including SNU-16 and KATO III cells. Treatment with RK-019 suppressed phosphorylation of FGFR and its downstream pathway proteins, such as FRS2, PLCγ, AKT, and Erk, resulting in cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, daily oral administration of RK-019 could attenuate tumor xenograft growth with no adverse effects. Here, we reported a novel specific FGFR inhibitor, RK-019, with potent anti-FGFR2-amp GC activity both in vitro and in vivo.

Intra-tumoral FGFR2 Expression Predicts Prognosis and Chemotherapy Response in Advanced HER2-positive Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between clinical outcomes and intra-tumoral fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) expression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer (GC) patients who had undergone HER2-targeted chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 22 patients with HER2-positive GC, who had undergone systemic chemotherapy. We performed immunohistochemistry staining of FGFR2 expression using surgically resected specimens or biopsied samples and evaluated clinicopathological characteristic and overall survival (OS) in the FGFR2-negative and -positive GC groups.

RESULTS

A total of 8 and 14 patients were placed in the FGFR2-negative and -positive group, respectively. The median OS rates were 56.2 and 16.0 months in the FGFR2-negative and -positive groups, respectively. The FGFR2-negative group had a significantly better prognosis after HER2-targeted chemotherapy [p=0.027 (log-rank test)]. The univariate analysis revealed that performing gastrectomy, response to combination chemotherapy with trastuzumab, and FGFR2 positivity were significantly correlated with OS. In a multivariate analysis, the response to combination chemotherapy with trastuzumab (p=0.008) was significantly correlated with OS. In addition, the proportions of patients who showed CR or PR in response to chemotherapy were 87.5 and 42.9% in the FGFR2-negative and -positive groups, respectively (p=0.031).

CONCLUSION

HER2-positive GC patients, without overexpression of FGFR2, exhibited an improved prognosis and response rate to trastuzumab combination chemotherapy. Assessment of intra-tumoral FGFR2 expression could be helpful in predicting the prognosis and response to trastuzumab in HER2-positive GC patients.

Incidence of FGFR2 Amplification and FGFR2 Fusion in Patients with Metastatic Cancer Using Clinical Sequencing

Aberrations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor2 (FGFR2) gene, including genetic alterations and chromosomal rearrangements, lead to the development and progression of cancer with poor prognosis. However, the mechanisms underlying the FGFR2 signaling pathway to facilitate the development of FGFR2-targeted therapies have not been fully explored. Here, we examined the clinicopathological features of FGFR2 amplification and fusion in gastrointestinal tract/genitourinary tract cancers. FGFR2 amplification and fusion were identified in approximately 1.5% and 1.1% of all cancer types in 1,373 patients, respectively, with both FGFR2 amplification and fusion occurring together at a rate of approximately 0.6%. Of all cancer types screened, gastric cancer (GC) was the most common cancer type with FGFR2 amplification (87.5% of all FGFR2 amplification case) or fusion (46.7% of all cases). In addition, FGFR2 alteration had poorer overall survival (OS, 13.7 months vs. 50.2 months, P = 0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS, 5.6 months vs. 11.4 months, P = 0.0005) than did those without FGFR2 alteration, respectively. Taken together, our data underscore to screen solid cancer patients for FGFR2 aberrations in oncology clinic.

FGFR2 overexpression and compromised survival in diffuse-type gastric cancer in a large central European cohort

The significance of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in gastric cancer (GC) has been studied predominantly in Asian patient cohorts. Data on White patients are scarce. Here, we aimed to independently validate the expression and putative tumor biological significance of FGFR2 in a large non-Asian GC cohort. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on large-area tissue sections from 493 patients with GC and evaluated using the HScore. GCs with moderate and strong FGFR2 expression were studied for Fgfr2 amplification using chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). Median overall survival was determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. The majority [240 (99.1%)] of FGFR2-positive GCs showed a variable combination of staining intensities with marked intratumoral heterogeneity, including weak [198 (40.2%) cases], moderate [145 (29.4%)], and strong [108 (21.9%)] staining in diverse combinations. 250 (50.9%) GCs expressed no FGFR2. Fgfr2 gene amplification was found in 40% of selected cases with high protein expression and was also heterogeneous at the cell level. FGFR2 protein expression did not correlate with patient survival in the entire cohort However, using different cutoff values, a negative correlation between FGFR2-expression and patient outcome was found for diffuse-type GC. FGFR2 expression was associated with a lower tumor grade and intestinal phenotype (p≤0.0001). FGFR2–positive diffuse-type GCs classify a small subset of patients with a poor tumor specific survival (5.29±1.3 vs. 14.67±1.9 months; p = 0.004).

Decreased albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio predicted poor survival of resectable gastric cancer patients

Background

The albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) is an innovative prognostic index for various cancer patients, the clinical significance of the AAPR in patients with GC is unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 227 resectable GC patients in our center. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to compare the prognostic abilities of the TNM and AAPR-TNM staging systems in DFS and OS prediction.

Results

The AAPR was significantly decreased in GC patients, and the optimal cut-off value for resectable and benign gastric disease was 0.437 as determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The correlation analysis revealed that decreased AAPR in GC was associated with T stage (P=0.004) and TNM stage (P=0.013). Decreased preoperative AAPR correlated with both unfavorable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis showed that the TNM stage (DFS: P=0.001, OS: P=0.002) and differential levels of AAPR (DFS: P<0.001, OS: P<0.001) were independent risk factors of DFS and OS. ROC analysis showed that the AAPR-TNM system was more superior than the TNM staging system for DFS (z=1.91, P=0.028) and OS (z=1.937, P=0.026) prediction. The likelihood ratio test (LRT) analysis indicated that the AAPR-TNM system had a significantly larger χ² for both DFS (35.58 vs. 34.51, P<0.001) and OS (32.92 vs. 30.07, P<0.001), and a lower Akaike information criterion (AIC) value both for DFS (1,032 vs. 1,065, P<0.001) and OS (869 vs. 898, P<0.001) compared to the TNM system.

Conclusions

The AAPR level significantly decreased in patients with GC, and impacted the prognosis of patients.

Precision medicine in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a complex disease linked to a series of environmental factors and unhealthy lifestyle habits, and especially to genetic alterations. GC represents the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Its onset is subtle, and the majority of patients are diagnosed once the cancer is already advanced. In recent years, there have been innovations in the management of advanced GC including the introduction of new classifications based on its molecular characteristics. Thanks to new technologies such as next-generation sequencing and microarray, the Cancer Genome Atlas and Asian Cancer Research Group classifications have also paved the way for precision medicine in GC, making it possible to integrate diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Among the objectives of the subdivision of GC into subtypes is to select patients in whom molecular targeted drugs can achieve the best results; many lines of research have been initiated to this end. After phase III clinical trials, trastuzumab, anti-Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (commonly known as ERBB2) and ramucirumab, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (commonly known as VEGFR2) monoclonal antibodies, were approved and introduced into first- and second-line therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic GC. However, the heterogeneity of this neoplasia makes the practical application of such approaches difficult. Unfortunately, scientific progress has not been matched by progress in clinical practice in terms of significant improvements in prognosis. Survival continues to be low in contrast to the reduction in deaths from many common cancers such as colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Although several target molecules have been identified on which targeted drugs can act and novel products have been introduced into experimental therapeutic protocols, the overall approach to treating advanced stage GC has not substantially changed. Currently, surgical resection with adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the most effective treatments for this disease. Future research should not underestimate the heterogeneity of GC when developing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies aimed toward improving patient survival.

Targeting the Oncogenic FGF-FGFR Axis in Gastric Carcinogenesis

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most wide-spread malignancies in the world. The oncogenic role of signaling of fibroblast growing factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) in gastric tumorigenesis has been gradually elucidated by recent studies. The expression pattern and clinical correlations of FGF and FGFR family members have been comprehensively delineated. Among them, FGF18 and FGFR2 demonstrate the most prominent driving role in gastric tumorigenesis with gene amplification or somatic mutations and serve as prognostic biomarkers. FGF-FGFR promotes tumor progression by crosstalking with multiple oncogenic pathways and this provides a rational therapeutic strategy by co-targeting the crosstalks to achieve synergistic effects. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the pathogenic mechanisms of FGF-FGFR signaling in gastric adenocarcinoma together with the current targeted strategies in aberrant FGF-FGFR activated GC cases.

Pathological and Prognostic Impacts of FGFR2 Overexpression in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2) protein expression by immunohistochemistry has been reported in up to 60% of patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, the clicopathological impacts of high FGFR2 expression have not been consistent among studies. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the pathological and prognostic significance of FGFR2 overexpression in patients with GC. A systematic search of the electronic databases including PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed. From ten studies, 4,294 patients were included in the pooled analyses of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pathological features and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for overall survival according to the FGFR2 expression status. Compared with tumors showing low FGFR2 expression, GCs with FGFR2 overexpression revealed deeper depth of invasion (pT3-4) (OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.70-4.06, p < 0.0001), higher rate of lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.31-2.67, p < 0.0001), and more advanced stage (III-IV) (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.07-2.96, p = 0.03). In addition, patients with FGFR2-overexpressed GC showed significantly worse survival than those with FGFR2-low tumor (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.25-1.58, p < 0.00001). In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that FGFR2 overexpression is associated with poor pathological features and prognosis in patients with GC.

Biomarkers of gastric cancer: Current topics and future perspective

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most prevalent malignant types in the world and an aggressive disease with a poor 5-year survival. This cancer is biologically and genetically heterogeneous with a poorly understood carcinogenesis at the molecular level. Although the incidence is declining, the outcome of patients with GC remains dismal. Thus, the detection at an early stage utilizing useful screening approaches, selection of an appropriate treatment plan, and effective monitoring is pivotal to reduce GC mortalities. Identification of biomarkers in a basis of clinical information and comprehensive genome analysis could improve diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of recurrence and treatment response. This review summarized the current status and approaches in GC biomarker, which could be potentially used for early diagnosis, accurate prediction of therapeutic approaches and discussed the future perspective based on the molecular classification and profiling.