Cytoplasmic expression of estrogen receptor β may predict poor outcome of EGFR-TKI therapy in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma

Dual-probe ligation without PCR for fluorescent sandwich assay of EGFR nucleotide variants in magnetic gene capture platform

A simple, rapid, and highly efficient fluorescent detection technique without PCR through dual-probe ligation with the genetic capture of magnetic beads and reported probe was developed for determination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene exon 19 deletions. The EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation makes up 48% of all mutations associated with anti-tyrosine kinase inhibition sensitivity, and thus, the EGFR nucleotide variant is very important in clinical diagnosis. In this approach, the dual-probe ligation was designed to target exon 19 deletion. The magnetic genetic captured system was then applied to capture the successful dual-probe ligation. Thereafter, a reporter probe which is coupled with 6-fluorescein amidite (6-FAM) was introduced to hybridize with dual-probe ligation product on the surface of streptavidin magnetic beads, and finally, the supernatant was taken for fluorescence measurements for distinguishing mutant types from wild types. After optimization (the RSD of the fluorescent intensity was less than 4.5% (n = 3) under the optimal condition), 20 blind DNA samples from the population were analyzed by this technique and further confirmed by direct sequencing. The results of our assay matched to those from direct sequencing data, evidencing that the developed method is accurate and successful. These 20 blind DNA samples were diagnosed as wild and then spiked with different percentages of the mutant gene to quantify the ratio of the wild and mutant genes. This strategy was also successfully applied to quantify the ratio of the wild and mutant genes with good linearity at the λex/λem of 480 nm/520 nm (r = 0.996), and the limit of detection reached 1.0% mutant type. This simple fluorescent detection of nucleotide variants shows its potential to be considered a tool in biological and clinical diagnosis. Importantly, this strategy offers a universal detection capability for any kind of mutation (point, deletion, insertion, or substitution) in a gene of interest.

Upregulation of estrogen receptor beta protein but not mRNA predicts poor prognosis and may be associated with enhanced translation in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

An increasing number of original studies suggest that estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) expression may be related to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis; however, the evidence remains inconclusive and conflicting. We aimed to systematically evaluate the expression and prognostic value of ERβ in NSCLC, and to explain the inconsistency between ERβ protein and mRNA level.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies (published before October 6, 2020) reporting the prognostic value of ERβ protein expression in NSCLC. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) were calculated. Transcriptome and survival data of lung adenocarcinoma patients were obtained from public databases for differential expression and survival analyses. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to examine the ERβ protein expression in 39 NSCLC patients. Western blotting and RT-qPCR were performed to analyze ERβ expression in two paired NSCLC and normal adjacent tissue samples. The effect of methyltransferase-like 13 (METTL3) on ERβ expression was investigated in a lung cancer cell line.

Results

Meta-analysis of 23 studies with a total of 3744 patients demonstrated that high protein expression of overall ERβ and cytoplasmic ERβ indicated poor OS (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.10; HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.95) in NSCLC. For lung adenocarcinoma especially, high protein expression of both overall/cytoplasmic ERβ and nuclear ERβ suggested poor OS (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.25; HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.80). Bioinformatics analysis indicated the expression of ERβ mRNA was not associated with the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Analysis of public databases showed that ERβ mRNA is not highly expressed in tumor tissues, however, IHC results revealed that ERβ protein is highly expressed in NSCLC tissues. We validated this inconsistency in ERβ expression in paired tumors and normal adjacent tissues from patients. Moreover, METTL3 knockdown in the A549 cell line downregulated ERβ protein expression but not ERβ mRNA expression.

Conclusions

Our study elucidated the inconsistency between ERβ protein and mRNA expression levels and their prognostic values. The results indicated that METTL3-driven enhanced translation in NSCLC may cause this inconsistency.

Genetic differences between benign phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas revealed through targeted next generation sequencing

Breast fibroepithelial lesions are biphasic tumors which comprise the common benign fibroadenomas (FAs) and the rarer phyllodes tumors (PTs). This study analyzed 262 (42%) conventional FAs, 45 (7%) cellular FAs, and 321 (51%) benign PTs contributed by the International Fibroepithelial Consortium, using a previously curated 16 gene panel. Benign PTs were found to possess a higher number of mutations, and higher rates of cancer driver gene alterations than both groups of FAs, in particular MED12, TERT promoter, RARA, FLNA, SETD2, RB1, and EGFR. Cases with MED12 mutations were also more likely to have TERT promoter, RARA, SETD2, and EGFR. There were no significant differences detected between conventional FAs and cellular FAs, except for PIK3CA and MAP3K1. TERT promoter alterations were most optimal in discriminating between FAs and benign PTs. Our study affirms the role of sequencing and key mutations that may assist in refining diagnoses of these lesions.

An Overview of Lung Cancer in Women and the Impact of Estrogen in Lung Carcinogenesis and Lung Cancer Treatment

Lung cancer incidence and mortality have significantly increased in women worldwide. Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common form of lung cancer globally. This type of lung cancer shows differences by sex, including the mutational burden, behavior, clinical characteristics, and response to treatment. The effect of sex on lung cancer patients' survival is still controversial; however, lung adenocarcinoma is considered a different disease in women and men. Moreover, lung adenocarcinoma is strongly influenced by estrogen and is also different depending on the hormonal status of the patient. Young pre-menopausal women have been explored as an independent group. They presented in more advanced stages at diagnosis, exhibited more aggressive tumors, and showed poor survival compared to men and post-menopausal women, supporting the role of sex hormones in this pathology. Several reports indicate the estrogen's role in lung carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Thus, there are currently some clinical trials testing the efficacy of antihormonal therapy in lung cancer treatment. This mini review shows the updated data about lung cancer in women, its characteristics, the etiological factors that influence carcinogenesis, and the critical role of estrogen in lung cancer and treatment.

Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERβ): A Ligand Activated Tumor Suppressor

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) belong to a superfamily of nuclear receptors called steroid hormone receptors, which, upon binding ligand, dimerize and translocate to the nucleus where they activate or repress the transcription of a large number of genes, thus modulating critical physiologic processes. ERβ has multiple isoforms that show differing association with prognosis. Expression levels of the full length ERβ1 isoform are often lower in aggressive cancers as compared to normal tissue. High ERβ1 expression is associated with improved overall survival in women with breast cancer. The promise of ERβ activation, as a potential targeted therapy, is based on concurrent activation of multiple tumor suppressor pathways with few side effects compared to chemotherapy. Thus, ERβ is a nuclear receptor with broad-spectrum tumor suppressor activity, which could serve as a potential treatment target in a variety of human cancers including breast cancer. Further development of highly selective agonists that lack ERα agonist activity, will be necessary to fully harness the potential of ERβ.

Network Pharmacology-Based Strategy for Predicting Therapy Targets of Traditional Chinese Medicine Xihuang Pill on Liver Cancer

Objective

To investigate the potential therapy targets and pharmacological mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) Xihuang pill in liver cancer based on network pharmacology.

Methods

Drug ingredients-target network was constructed based on the target sets of Xihuang pill and liver cancer. The overlapping genes between Xihuang pill targets and liver cancer-related molecular targets were investigated using comparative analysis. Moreover, the PPI network and module was constructed based on overlapping genes and hub nodes, respectively, followed by the pathway enrichment analysis.

Results

A drug ingredients-target network was established with 1184 nodes and 11035 interactions. Moreover, a total of 106 overlapping genes were revealed between drug targets and liver cancer molecular targets. Furthermore, a PPI network and 4 modules were further investigated based on overlapping genes, respectively. These hub nodes such as VEGFA and EGFR were mainly enriched in GO functions including positive regulation of MAP kinase activity, activation of protein kinase activity, regulation of MAP kinase activity, and pathways like proteoglycans in cancer, bladder cancer, and estrogen signaling.

Conclusion

VEGFA and EGFR might be potential therapy targets of Xihuang pill in liver cancer. Furthermore, the effect of Xihuang pill on liver cancer might be realized by targeting VEGFA and EGFR in pathways like proteoglycans in cancer and estrogen signaling.

Hormone Replacement Therapy in Cancer Survivors - Review of the Literature

Rapid advance in oncology leads to increasing survival of oncologic patients. More and more of them live long enough to reach either the natural age of menopause or, as a side effect of their oncotherapy, experience the cessation of gonadal function, leading to premature ovarian insufficiency, with disturbing vasomotor symtoms and long-term negative cardiovascular and skeletal effects. Thus, an ever increasing number of cancer survivors search endocrinologic help in the form of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The misinterpretation of the WHI (Women's Health Initiative) Study has lead to an irrational fear of female hormone replacement, both by the general population and medical professionals. It has seemed the logical and safe conclusion to many physicians to avoid HRT, supposing that this attitude definitely causes no harm, whereas the decision of prescribing estrogen alone or with progestins might bear oncologic and thromboembolic risks and may even lead to litigation in case of a potentially related complication. However, it was known even before the WHI results that premature menopause and hypogonadism decreases the life expectancy of women by years through its skeletal and cardiovascular effects, and this negative effect correlates with the length of the hypoestrogenaemic period. Therefore, the denial of HRT also needs to be supported by evidence and should be weighed againts the risks of HRT. Yet, the oncologic risk of HRT is extremely difficult to assess. In this work we review the latest evidence from in vitro experiments to clinical studies, regarding HRT in survivors of gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancers. Based on our literature research, we group tumours regarding the oncologic risk of properly chosen female hormone replacement therapy in cancer survivors as follows: ’HRT is advanageous’ (e.g. endometrial cancer type I, cervical adenocarcinoma, haematologic malignancies, local cutaneous malignant melanoma, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular cancer); ’HRT is neutral’ (e.g. BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers without cancer, endometrial cancer type II, uterinal carcinosarcoma and adenosarcoma, certain types of ovarian cancer, cervical, vaginal and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, prolactinoma, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, thyroid cancer); ’HRT is relatively contraindicated’ for various reasons (e.g. leiomyosarcoma, certain types of ovarian tumours, brain tumours, advanced metastatic malignant melanoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, bladder cancer); ’HRT is diasadvantageous and thus contraindicated’ (e.g. breast cancer, endometrial stroma sarcoma, meningioma, glioma, hormone receptor positive gastric and bladder cancer).