Gene mutation profile and risk stratification in AML1‑ETO‑positive acute myeloid leukemia based on next‑generation sequencing

Modeling and therapeutic targeting of t(8;21) AML with/without TP53 deficiency

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1);RUNX1-ETO is one of the most common subtypes of AML. Although t(8;21) AML has been classified as favorable-risk, only about half of patients are cured with current therapies. Several genetic abnormalities, including TP53 mutations and deletions, negatively impact survival in t(8;21) AML. In this study, we established Cas9+ mouse models of t(8;21) AML with intact or deficient Tpr53 (a mouse homolog of TP53) using a retrovirus-mediated gene transfer and transplantation system. Trp53 deficiency accelerates the in vivo development of AML driven by RUNX1-ETO9a, a short isoform of RUNX1-ETO with strong leukemogenic potential. Trp53 deficiency also confers resistance to genetic depletion of RUNX1 and a TP53-activating drug in t(8;21) AML. However, Trp53-deficient t(8;21) AML cells were still sensitive to several drugs such as dexamethasone. Cas9+ RUNX1-ETO9a cells with/without Trp53 deficiency can produce AML in vivo, can be cultured in vitro for several weeks, and allow efficient gene depletion using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, providing useful tools to advance our understanding of t(8;21) AML.

Prognostic significance of ASXL1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although genetic mutations in additional sex-combs-like 1 (ASXL1) are prevalent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), their exact impact on the AML prognosis remains uncertain. Hence, the present article was carried out to explore the prognostic importance of ASXL1 mutations in AML.

Methods

We thoroughly searched electronic scientific databases to find eligible papers. Twenty-seven studies with an overall number of 8,953 participants were selected for the current systematic review. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were extracted from all studies with multivariate or univariate analysis. Pooled HRs and p-values were also calculated as a part of our work.

Results

The pooled HR for OS in multivariable analysis indicated that ASXL1 significantly diminished survival in AML patients (pooled HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.342-2.091).

Conclusions

ASXL1 mutations may confer a poor prognosis in AML. Hence, they may be regarded as potential prognostic factors. However, more detailed studies with different ASXL1 mutations are suggested to shed light on this issue.

The Prognostic Value of TP53 Mutations in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Mutations of the tumor protein p53 (TP53) gene were considered to be associated with an unfavorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This meta-analysis aimed to systematically elucidate the prognostic value of TP53 mutation in adult patients with AML.

METHOD

A comprehensive literature search was conducted for eligible studies published before August 2021. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for prognostic parameters. Subgroup analyses based on intensive treatment were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies with 7,062 patients were included. As compared to wild-type carriers, AML patients with TP53 mutations had significantly shorter OS (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 2.16-2.67, I2: 46.6%). Similar results were found in DFS (HR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.88-4.38), EFS (HR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.97-3.31), and RFS (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.79-3.22). Mutant TP53 predicted inferior OS (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 2.41-3.18) in the intensively treated AML subgroup, compared with the non-intensively treated group (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.58-2.26). Among intensively-treated AML patients, the age of 65 did not affect the prognostic value of TP53 mutations. Besides, TP53 mutation was also strongly associated with an elevated risk of adverse cytogenetics, which conferred a dismal OS in AML patients (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.74-2.37).

CONCLUSION

TP53 mutation exhibits a promising potential for discriminating AML patients with a worse prognosis, thus being capable of serving as a novel tool for prognostication and therapeutic decision-making in the management of AML.

A Predictor Combining Clinical and Genetic Factors for AML1-ETO Leukemia Patients

Core Binding Factor (CBF)-AML is one of the most common somatic mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). t(8;21)/AML1-ETO-positive acute myeloid leukemia accounts for 5-10% of all AMLs. In this study, we consecutively included 254 AML1-ETO patients diagnosed and treated at our institute from December 2009 to March 2020, and evaluated molecular mutations by 185-gene NGS platform to explore genetic co-occurrences with clinical outcomes. Our results showed that high KIT VAF(≥15%) correlated with shortened overall survival compared to other cases with no KIT mutation (3-year OS rate 26.6% vs 59.0% vs 69.6%, HR 1.50, 95%CI 0.78-2.89, P=0.0005). However, no difference was found in patients’ OS whether they have KIT mutation in two or three sites. Additionally, we constructed a risk model by combining clinical and molecular factors; this model was validated in other independent cohorts. In summary, our study showed that c-kit other than any other mutations would influence the OS in AML1-ETO patients. A proposed predictor combining both clinical and genetic factors is applicable to prognostic prediction in AML1-ETO patients.

A Phase I trial of talazoparib in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies

Aim:

The objective of this study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-leukemic activity of talazoparib.

Patients & methods:

This Phase I, two-cohort, dose-escalation trial evaluated talazoparib monotherapy in advanced hematologic malignancies (cohort 1: acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome; cohort 2: chronic lymphocytic leukemia/mantle cell lymphoma).

Results:

Thirty-three (cohort 1: n = 25; cohort 2: n = 8) patients received talazoparib (0.1–2.0 mg once daily). The MTD was exceeded at 2.0 mg/day in cohort 1 and at 0.9 mg/day in cohort 2. Grade ≥3 adverse events were primarily hematologic. Eighteen (54.5%) patients reported stable disease.

Conclusion:

Talazoparib is relatively well tolerated in hematologic malignancies, with a similar MTD as in solid tumors, and shows preliminary anti leukemic activity.

Clinical trial registration: NCT01399840 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

The objective of this study was to define the highest dose of talazoparib that people with various types of leukemia (mainly various blood cancers) could tolerate. People were assigned into two cohorts based on their type of leukemia: cohort 1 included 25 people with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome; cohort 2 included 8 people with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or mantle cell lymphoma. Similar to what researchers observed for people with solid tumors, the highest tolerated dose was 1.35 mg per day in cohort 1, and it was estimated to be ∼0.9 mg per day in cohort 2. Side effects that occurred during the study were expected, given the types of leukemia being treated. Talazoparib also showed promising anti leukemic effects in some patients.

In this Phase I talazoparib trial in hematologic malignancies (cohort 1: AML/MDS, n = 25; cohort 2: CLL/MCL, n = 8), the maximum tolerated dose was exceeded at 2.0 and 0.9 mg/day in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Stable disease and transfusion independence were also observed.

Prognostic values of D816V KIT mutation and peri-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring on acute myeloid leukemia with CBFB-MYH11

Given the controversies in the prognostic value of KIT mutations and optimal thresholds and time points of MRD monitoring for AML with CBFB-MYH11, we retrospectively evaluated 88 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT, n = 60) or autologous HSCT (Auto-HSCT, n = 28). The D816V KIT mutation was significantly associated with post-transplant relapse, contrasting with other types of mutations in KIT. Pre- and post-transplant (3 months after transplant) CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were useful in predicting post-transplant relapse and poor survival. The optimal threshold was determined as a 2 log reduction at both time points. In multivariate analysis, the D816V KIT mutation and CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were independently associated with post-transplant relapse and survival. Stratification by D816V KIT and pre-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD status further distinguished the risk of relapse and survival. Auto-HSCT was superior to Allo-HSCT in MRD negative patients without D816V KIT, while Allo-HSCT trended to be superior to Auto-HSCT in patients with MRD positivity or the D816V KIT mutation. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the differentiated prognostic value of the D816V KIT mutation in AML with CBFB-MYH11 and clarified optimal time points and thresholds for CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring in the setting of HSCT.

Prognostic Impacts of D816V KIT Mutation and Peri-Transplant RUNX1-RUNX1T1 MRD Monitoring on Acute Myeloid Leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1

Simple Summary

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 is a heterogeneous disease entailing different prognoses. Patients with high-risk features can benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or autologous HSCT. However, insufficient data about major risk factors, such as KIT mutations and measurable residual disease (MRD) status for relapse, make it difficult to clarify the benefit of each transplant strategy. Moreover, limited data are available to elucidate the exact prognostic impacts of different types of KIT mutations and optimal thresholds or time points for RUNX1–RUNX1T1 MRD assessment, particularly in the setting of HSCT. Given the lack of prospective study, the current retrospective study, including a large cohort of high-risk AML patients with RUNX1–RUNX1T1, firstly demonstrated the differentiated prognostic impact of D816V KIT mutation among various KIT mutations and clarified optimal time points and thresholds for RUNX1–RUNX1T1 MRD monitoring in the setting of HSCT.

Abstract

The prognostic significance of KIT mutations and optimal thresholds and time points of measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 remain controversial in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated 166 high-risk patients who underwent allogeneic (Allo-HSCT, n = 112) or autologous HSCT (Auto-HSCT, n = 54). D816V KIT mutation, a subtype of exon 17 mutations, was significantly associated with post-transplant relapse and poor survival, while other types of mutations in exons 17 and 8 were not associated with post-transplant relapse. Pre- and post-transplant RUNX1–RUNX1T1 MRD assessments were useful for predicting post-transplant relapse and poor survival with a higher sensitivity at later time points. Survival analysis for each stratified group by D816V KIT mutation and pre-transplant RUNX1–RUNX1T1 MRD status demonstrated that Auto-HSCT was superior to Allo-HSCT in MRD-negative patients without D816V KIT mutation, while Allo-HSCT was superior to Auto-HSCT in MRD-negative patients with D816V KIT mutation. Very poor outcomes of pre-transplant MRD-positive patients with D816V KIT mutation suggested that this group should be treated in clinical trials. Risk stratification by both D816V KIT mutation and RUNX1–RUNX1T1 MRD status will provide a platform for decision-making or risk-adapted therapeutic approaches.