Inclusion Body Myositis in a Patient with RNA Polymerase III Antibody-positive Systemic Sclerosis

Myositis with prominent B cell aggregates may meet classification criteria for sporadic inclusion body myositis

The objective of this study was to report the clinical, serological and pathological features of patients with autoimmune myositis other than dermatomyositis, who displayed both muscle weakness on physical examination and prominent B cell aggregates on muscle pathology, defined as ≥ 30 CD20+ cells/aggregate. Specifically, the presence of a brachio-cervical inflammatory myopathies or a sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) phenotype was recorded. Over a three-year period, eight patients were identified from two university neuropathology referral centers. Seven of 8 (88%) patients had an associated connective tissue disease (CTD): rheumatoid arthritis (n=3), systemic sclerosis (n=2), Sjögren's syndrome (n=1) and systemic lupus erythematosus (n=1), while one patient died on initial presentation without a complete serological and cancer investigation. A brachio-cervical phenotype, i.e. neck weakness, proximal weakness more than distal and shoulder abduction weakness greater than hip flexors, was seen in two patients (25%), while one patient had both proximal and diaphragmatic weakness. In contrast, an IBM-like clinical phenotype was seen in the last five patients (63%), who either had finger flexor weakness and/or quadriceps weakness ≤ 4 on the manual muscle testing MRC-5 scale. Although these 5 patients met at least one set of classification criteria for sIBM, an integrated clinico-sero-pathological approach argued against a diagnosis of sIBM. In summary, in a weak patient with myositis plus an associated CTD and lymphoid aggregates at muscle pathology, B cell predominant aggregates may represent a morphological biomarker against a diagnosis of sIBM.

Secondary myopathy due to systemic diseases

Background

Some systemic diseases also affect the skeletal muscle to various degrees and with different manifestations. This review aimed at summarizing and discussing recent advances concerning the management of muscle disease in systemic diseases.

Method

Literature review by search of MEDLINE, and Current Contents with appropriate search terms.

Results

Secondary muscle disease occurs in infectious disease, endocrine disorders, metabolic disorders, immunological disease, vascular diseases, hematological disorders, and malignancies. Muscle manifestations in these categories include pathogen‐caused myositis, muscle infarction, rhabdomyolysis, myasthenia, immune‐mediated myositis, necrotising myopathy, or vasculitis‐associated myopathy. Muscle affection may concern only a single muscle, a group of muscles, or the entire musculature. Severity of muscle affection may be transient or permanent, may be a minor part of or may dominate the clinical picture, or may be mild or severe, requiring invasive measures including artificial ventilation if the respiratory muscles are additionally involved. Diagnostic work‐up is similar to that of primary myopathies by application of non‐invasive and invasive techniques. Treatment of muscle involvement in systemic diseases is based on elimination of the underlying cause and supportive measures. The prognosis is usually fair if the causative disorder is effectively treatable but can be fatal in single cases if the entire musculature including the respiratory muscles is involved, in case of infection, or in case of severe rhabdomyolysis.

Conclusion

Secondary muscle manifestations of systemic diseases must be addressed and appropriately managed. Prognosis of secondary muscle disease in systemic diseases is usually fair if the underlying condition is accessible to treatment.

T-Cell-Mediated Inflammatory Myopathies in HIV-Positive Individuals: A Histologic Study of 19 Cases

T cell-mediated inflammatory myopathies (polymyositis [PM] and inclusion body myositis [IBM]) sometimes arise in conjunction with HIV infection; however, it is not understood whether PM and IBM arising in the context of HIV (HIV-PM and HV-IBM) differ from PM and IBM arising sporadically in HIV-negative individuals (sPM and sIBM). Here, we report the largest series of T cell-mediated inflammatory myopathies from HIV-infected patients (19 biopsies from 15 subjects); 5 cases were pathologically classified as PM (HIV-PM) and 14 as IBM (HIV-IBM). As with sporadic cases, quantitative immunohistochemistry for LC3, p62, and TDP-43 showed significantly greater percentage of stained fibers (% FS) in HIV-IBM compared to HIV-PM samples; however, there was no significant difference in % FS for any of the three markers between HIV-associated and sporadic cases. Despite histologic similarities between HIV-IBM and sIBM but in concordance with prior case reports, patients with HIV-IBM were significantly younger at diagnosis than patients with sIBM; in contrast, the mean age of HIV-PM and sPM patients was not significantly different. In summary, HIV-PM and HIV-IBM are morphologically similar to sPM and sIBM; thus, it remains unclear why patients with HIV-IBM, in contrast to patients with sIBM, sometimes show clinical improvement in response to immunosuppressive therapy.