Case Report and Literature Review: Quinacrine-induced Cholestatic Hepatitis in Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease

Treatment strategies for nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis: a systematic review

RATIONALE FOR REVIEW

Giardiasis is one of the most common human protozoal infections worldwide. First-line therapy of giardiasis includes nitroimidazole antibiotics. However, treatment failure with nitroimidazoles is increasingly reported, with up to 45% of patients not responding to initial treatment. There is no clear consensus on the approach to the management of nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on pharmacotherapy for nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the optimal management strategies for nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis. We searched Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library using the following search terms 'Giardia' AND 'treatment failure' OR 'refractory giardia' OR 'resistant giardia' with date limits of 1 January 1970 to 30 June 2021. We included all reports on humans, which described clinical outcomes of individuals with treatment refractory giardiasis, including case series and case reports. A descriptive synthesis of the data was conducted with pooling of data for interventions.

KEY FINDINGS

Included in this review were five prospective studies, three retrospective studies, seven case series and nine case reports. Across these reports, a wide heterogeneity of treatment regimens was employed, including retreatment with an alternative nitroimidazole, combination therapy with a nitroimidazole and another agent and monotherapy with non-nitroimidazole regimens, including quinacrine, paromomycin and nitazoxanide. Retreatment with a nitroimidazole was not an effective therapy for refractory giardiasis. However, treatment with a nitroimidazole in combination with albendazole had a cure rate of 66.9%. In the included studies, quinacrine monotherapy was administered to a total of 179 patients, with a clinical cure rate of 88.8%. Overall, quinacrine was fairly well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Reports on the treatment of nitroimidazole-refractory giardiasis demonstrate a heterogeneous approach to treatment. Of these, quinacrine appeared to be highly effective, though more data on its safety are needed.

Prescription strategy of antimalarials in cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus: an international survey

Background:

Antimalarial agents (AMs), mainly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine, are the cornerstone of treatment of cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus. However, many aspects of AM prescription remain empirical. The aim of this study was to assess the modalities of AM prescription among physicians treating patients with lupus and to verify the assumption that AM use is heterogeneous and frequently at variance with international guidelines.

Methods:

We performed an international cross-sectional study among physicians involved in lupus care, using a web-based survey (from September 2019 to July 2020) addressing the main controversial aspects of AM prescription.

Results:

A total of 298 physicians [median age: 42 (interquartile range: 17) years, mainly internists and rheumatologists] from 35 countries participated to the study. A total of 93% used HCQ as the first-line AM, 69.5% used fixed doses of AMs (mainly 400 mg/day for HCQ) and only 37.9% adjusted the dose in case of renal failure. The main reasons for measuring HCQ blood levels were suspected non-adherence (55.7%) and failure of AM treatment (34.1%). In case of AM failure, 58.0% added an immunosuppressive agent. In case of remission, 49.7% maintained the same dose of AM, whereas 48.3% reduced the dose. One-third of respondents reported not following the American screening guidelines on AM retinal toxicity and 40.9% started retinal screening from the first year of treatment.

Conclusion:

This study highlights the strong heterogeneity of AM prescription in lupus, as well as several key unmet needs regarding AMs. This may be improved by developing more comprehensive recommendations and favoring dissemination among physicians.

Metformin Disrupts Bile Acid Efflux by Repressing Bile Salt Export Pump Expression

PURPOSE

The bile salt export pump (BSEP), a key player in hepatic bile acid clearance, has been the center of research on drug-induced cholestasis. However, such studies focus primarily on the direct inhibition of BSEP, often overlooking the potential impact of transcriptional repression. This work aims to explore the disruption of bile acid efflux caused by drug-induced BSEP repression.

METHODS

BSEP activity was analyzed in human primary hepatocytes (HPH) using a traditional biliary-clearance experiment and a modified efflux assay, which includes a 72-h pretreatment prior to efflux measurement. Relative mRNA and protein expressions were examined by RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively.

RESULTS

Metformin concentration-dependently repressed BSEP expression in HPH. Although metformin did not directly inhibit BSEP activity, longer metformin exposure reduced BSEP transport function in HPH by down-regulating BSEP expression. BSEP repression by metformin was found to be AMP-activated protein kinase-independent. Additional screening of 10 reported cholestatic non-BSEP inhibitors revealed that the anti-cancer drug tamoxifen also markedly repressed BSEP expression and reduced BSEP activity in HPH.

CONCLUSIONS

Repression of BSEP alone is sufficient to disrupt hepatic bile acid efflux. Metformin and tamoxifen appear to be prototypes of a class of BSEP repressors that may cause drug-induced cholestasis through gene repression instead of direct BSEP inhibition.

CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document

BACKGROUND

Well-written and transparent case reports (1) reveal early signals of potential benefits, harms, and information on the use of resources; (2) provide information for clinical research and clinical practice guidelines, and (3) inform medical education. High-quality case reports are more likely when authors follow reporting guidelines. During 2011-2012, a group of clinicians, researchers, and journal editors developed recommendations for the accurate reporting of information in case reports that resulted in the CARE (CAse REport) Statement and Checklist. They were presented at the 2013 International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, have been endorsed by multiple medical journals, and translated into nine languages.

OBJECTIVES

This explanation and elaboration document has the objective to increase the use and dissemination of the CARE Checklist in writing and publishing case reports.

ARTICLE DESIGN AND SETTING

Each item from the CARE Checklist is explained and accompanied by published examples. The explanations and examples in this document are designed to support the writing of high-quality case reports by authors and their critical appraisal by editors, peer reviewers, and readers.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

This article and the 2013 CARE Statement and Checklist, available from the CARE website [www.care-statement.org] and the EQUATOR Network [www.equator-network.org], are resources for improving the completeness and transparency of case reports.