Relationship of Psoriatic Arthritis to Other Spondyloarthritides

Adult Inflammatory Arthritides: What the Radiologist Should Know

Developments and improvements in knowledge are rapid and ongoing in both the radiologic and rheumatologic fields. During the past decade, the roles of imaging and the radiologist in the assessment and management of many inflammatory rheumatologic diseases have undergone several changes. To remain effective in patient care, the radiologist needs to be aware of these changes when recommending and interpreting imaging examinations for the referring physician. The goal of contemporary rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management is to redefine RA as a disease that is no longer characterized by erosions, which reflect established or long-standing untreated disease. Most cases of RA are now diagnosed clinically, but imaging increases diagnostic confidence, is superior to clinical examination for the detection of joint inflammation, and plays an important role in patient management. The concept of the seronegative spondyloarthritides has recently been redefined by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS). This new set of ASAS classification criteria divides the spectrum of spondyloarthritis on the basis of predominantly axial skeletal clinical manifestations or predominantly peripheral skeletal clinical manifestations. For axial spondyloarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography play crucial roles for classification and diagnosis. For both peripheral spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis, the radiologist can provide important information that influences classification and diagnosis, including documenting radiologic evidence of juxta-articular new bone formation, diagnosing sacroiliitis, or delineating the presence and extent of enthesitis and dactylitis. The radiologist's familiarity with recent classification criteria, in addition to the traditional diagnostic characteristics of the individual inflammatory arthritides, maximizes the productive interface between the radiologist and the rheumatologist. ^©RSNA, 2016.

Prevalence of psoriatic arthritis and costs generated by treatment of psoriatic arthritis patients in the public health system - the case of Poland

Objective

The objective of the study was to analyse the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Poland and to assess the costs generated by treatment of PsA patients in the system of public healthcare.

Material and methods

The analysis was based on the database of the public payer, the National Health Fund (NFZ). PsA was defined by the diagnostic ICD-10 codes M07 (Enteropathic arthropathies) and L40.5 (Psoriatic arthropathies). The estimate of the costs was based on the reports submitted to the NFZ by health service providers. The prevalence rates were calculated using the NFZ data and the population estimates from the Central Statistical Office of Poland (GUS).

Results

In 2015, the prevalence of PsA (ICD-10: L40.5 and M07) in Poland was 3.2 per 10 000 population (3.7 in women and 2.6 in men). In 2015, nearly 7.3 thousand patients with the diagnosis of M07 and 6.3 thousand patients with the diagnosis of L40.5 received healthcare benefits. Women accounted for 60.6% of those patients. Nearly three fourths of PsA patients were aged 40 to 69 years with the median age of 54 years (56 years in women and 50 years in men). Between 2008 and 2015 the NFZ expenditure on the treatment of PsA increased from 6.6 million Polish zloty (PLN) (1.9 million EUR) to PLN 50.8 million (12.1 million EUR). In the same period, the number of PsA patients increased from 3.4 thousand to 11.9 thousand. In 2015, the mean cost of treatment per PsA patient was PLN 3.8 thousand.

Conclusions

The PsA prevalence rates estimated by the authors from the NFZ database are clearly lower than those derived from studies in other European countries, which may suggest that the actual number of PsA patients in Poland may be underestimated. Still the number of patients treated for PsA increased nearly 3.5-fold during 2008–2015, when the cost of PsA treatment rose more than 7 times.