Assessment of Response to Treatment, Remission, and Minimal Disease Activity in Axial Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

A systematic review of sex and gender differences in treatment outcome of inflammatory skin diseases: Is it time for new guidelines?

Gender- and sex-specific differences in medicine were long-time disregarded. Despite numerous indications of gender- and sex-specific influences on the treatment of dermatological conditions, these have not yet been systematically investigated. To meet this unmet need, we conducted the present systematic review on the topic of gender and sex differences in the treatement outcome of skin diseases. Embase (via Ovid), PubMed Medline and Web of Science were searched, in between January 2001 and December 2022. English and german randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts and case-control studies that examined differences between men and women in treatment outcomes of skin diseases were included. Two authors independently screened the reports for eligibility, one extracted all data (the second double-checked) and critically appraised the quality and risk of bias of the studies. Eighty-three reports were included. The largest share of the identified publications focused on gender differences in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (n = 49), followed by melanoma (n = 8) and sporadic studies (n < 5) of inflammatory, infectious and autoimmune skin diseases. The main topics in which gender differences could be identified were choice of treatment, time to initiation of treatment, therapy response, adverse events, adherence and treatment satisfaction. For psoriasis, gender differences could be found in all aspects, while for the other skin diseases specific publications on gender differences are still missing. This systematic review shows numerous gender differences but also reveals major gaps in gender-specific care in dermatology which should be narrowed in the upcoming years to optimize a patient-centred, individualized, gender-equal healthcare. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022306626.

Assessment of Patient-Physician Interactions in Psoriatic Arthritis: National Results of the ASSIST Study

INTRODUCTION

An overarching principle for the management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a shared decision-making process between physicians and patients. The aim of this study is to assess the patient-physician relationship in a group of patients with PsA, by using the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) and CollaboRATE instruments.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional multicenter study where consecutive patients with PsA were enrolled. For each patient, the main demographic, comorbid conditions, and clinical data were collected, including the assessment of disease activity, function, quality of life, and impact of disease. PEPPI and CollaboRATE questionnaires were used, respectively, to evaluate the patient's perception of the patient-physician relationship and the shared decision-making process.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients with PsA were enrolled at four centers in Italy. Overall, our patients showed a high level of confidence in obtaining needed health care, with relatively high median (IQR) values of PEPPI (20; 16-23), and a good shared decision-making process, with high median (IQR) values of CollaboRATE questionnaire (7; 6-9). PEPPI and CollaboRATE scores showed a statistically significant inverse correlation with different clinical variables such as disease duration, Leeds Enthesitis Index, PsA impact of Disease, Health Assessment Questionnaire, pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity and clinical disease activity for PsA. The presence of comorbidities did not appear to be associated with lower values of PEPPI and CollaboRATE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, few patients with PsA were at risk of suboptimal communication with their physician. This phenomenon appeared to be primarily related to higher disease activity and burden.

Sex Differences in the Effectiveness of First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From the European Spondyloarthritis Research Collaboration Network

OBJECTIVE

Women with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may have reduced tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) effectiveness compared to men. We examined sex differences in treatment response and retention rates during 24 months of follow-up among patients with PsA initiating their first TNFi.

METHODS

Data from patients with PsA across 13 European Spondyloarthritis Research Collaboration Network registries starting their first TNFi were pooled. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association between sex and treatment response using low disease activity (LDA) according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) (<3.2) at six months as the primary outcome. Analyses were adjusted for age, country, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment, and TNFi start year. Retention rates were explored using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

We analyzed the treatment response of 7,679 patients with PsA (50% women) with available data on LDA at six months. At baseline, women and men had similar characteristics, including mean DAS28-CRP (women vs men, 4.4 [SD 1.2] vs 4.2 [SD 1.2]), though patient-reported outcome measures were worse in women. At six months, 64% of women and 78% of men had LDA (relative risk [RR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.84). This difference was similar after adjustment (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.81-0.85). TNFi retention rates were evaluated in 17,842 patients with PsA. Women had significantly lower retention rates than men at all time points (women 79%, 64%, and 50% vs men 88%, 77%, and 64% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Despite comparable disease characteristics at baseline, women with PsA have reduced treatment response and retention rates to their first TNFi, highlighting the need to consider sex differences in PsA research and management.

Use of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis With and Without Axial Disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) is a responsive instrument in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and whether it differentiates between axial and peripheral disease activity in PsA.

METHODS

Individuals with PsA initiating therapy in a longitudinal cohort study based in the United States were included. Axial PsA (axPsA), most often also associated with peripheral disease, was defined as fulfillment of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society axial spondyloarthritis classification criteria or presence of axial disease imaging features. Baseline BASDAI, individual BASDAI items, patient global assessment, patient pain, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, and score changes following therapy initiation were descriptively reported. Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated as the mean change divided by the SD of the change.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) baseline BASDAI score at the time of therapy initiation was 5.0 (2.2) among those with axPsA (n = 40) and 4.8 (2.0) among those with peripheral-only disease (n = 79). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcome scores between the groups. The mean change for BASDAI was similar among axial vs peripheral disease (-0.75 vs -0.83). SRMs were similar across axial vs peripheral disease for BASDAI (-0.37 vs -0.44) and the individual BASDAI items.

CONCLUSION

BASDAI has reasonable responsiveness in PsA but does not differentiate between axPsA and peripheral PsA. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03378336).

Treat-to-target in real-life psoriatic arthritis patients: achieving minimal disease activity with bDMARDs/tsDMARDs and potential barriers

OBJECTIVE

(1) to describe the frequency of minimal disease activity (MDA) in a real-life psoriatic arthritis (PsA) cohort, (2) to longitudinally explore predictors of MDA; (3) to examine frequency and predictors of low disease activity (LDA) in patients with axial involvement (axPsA).

METHODS

consecutive PsA patients in stable biological/targeted-synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs/tDMARDs) who attended our center were enrolled. Disease activity indices, including MDA and ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score-LDA (ASDAS-LDA) for axPsA, were evaluated at baseline and every 6 months, up to 36 months or bDMARDs/tsDMARDs discontinuation. Patients' history, BMI, comorbidities - including osteoarthritis (OA) and fibromyalgia - were collected. Variables were compared between patients who achieved sustained MDA and those who did not. Multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were built to identify predictors of MDA and ASDAS-LDA over time. Data were expressed as beta coefficient (95%CI).

RESULTS

104 patients were enrolled, 54% males, mean age 55.7 years; 52% had axPsA. Across all evaluations, 52-61% reached MDA, and 17-24% achieved ASDAS-LDA. AxPsA, fibromyalgia, OA and BMI≥35 were less frequently observed in patients with sustained MDA. The GEE model confirmed the following factors were significantly and independently associated with MDA: age (Beta=-0.05), bDMARDs/tsDMARDs duration (Beta=+0.31), axPsA (Beta=-1.07), fibromyalgia (Beta=-3.35), OA (Beta=-1.87), BMI≥35 (Beta=-2.53). Age (Beta=-0.01), fibromyalgia (Beta=-2.03) and OA (Beta=-1.30) were also independently associated with ASDAS-LDA.

CONCLUSIONS

MDA is an attainable target in real-life. AxPsA represents a difficult-to-treat subset. Sustained MDA depends on disease features (axPsA) as well as patients' characteristics (e.g. age, bDMARDs/tDMARDs duration, comorbidities).

The Conundrum of Psoriatic Arthritis: a Pathogenetic and Clinical Pattern at the Midpoint of Autoinflammation and Autoimmunity

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by psoriasis, synovitis, enthesitis, spondylitis, and the possible association with other extra-articular manifestations and comorbidities. It is a multifaceted and systemic disorder sustained by complex pathogenesis, combining aspects of autoinflammation and autoimmunity. Features of PsA autoinflammation include the role of biomechanical stress in the onset and/or exacerbation of the disease; the evidence of involvement of the innate immune response mediators in the skin, peripheral blood and synovial tissue; an equal gender distribution; the clinical course which may encounter periods of prolonged remission and overlapping features with autoinflammatory syndromes. Conversely, the role of autoimmunity is evoked by the association with class I major histocompatibility complex alleles, the polyarticular pattern of the disease which sometimes resembles rheumatoid arthritis and the presence of serum autoantibodies. Genetics also provide important insights into the pathogenesis of PsA, particularly related to class I HLA being associated with psoriasis and PsA. In this review, we provide a comprehensive review of the pathogenesis, genetics and clinical features of PsA that endorse the mixed nature of a disorder at the crossroads of autoinflammation and autoimmunity.

Management of Axial Disease in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Literature Review Informing the 2021 GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Axial involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a common subset of this condition, but a unanimous definition has yet to be established. It has been defined by using different criteria, ranging from the presence of at least unilateral grade 2 sacroiliitis to those used for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or simply the presence of inflammatory low back pain (IBP). Our aim was to identify and evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for treatment of axial disease in PsA.

METHODS

This systematic review is an update of the axial PsA (axPsA) domain of the treatment recommendations project by the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA).

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature showed that new biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug classes, namely interleukin (IL)-17A and Janus kinase inhibitors, could be considered for the treatment of axPsA. This would be in addition to previously recommended treatments such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, simple analgesia, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Conflicting evidence still remains regarding the use of IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are needed for a better understanding of the treatment of axPsA, as well as validated outcome measures.

Psoriatic arthritis successfully treated with second-line anti-interleukin-6 treatment: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis treatment with antitumor necrosis factor has been shown to reduce disease activity. Nonetheless, more than 30% of patients do not achieve a sufficient response to tumor necrosis factor blockers. Currently, treatment with interleukin-6 inhibitors is expected to be effective and suppress the joint destruction in patients with psoriatic arthritis; however, evidence regarding their efficacy is limited to a few reports.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 78-year-old Japanese woman with psoriatic arthritis associated with rapid joint destruction was successfully treated with a second-line anti-interleukin-6 receptor agent. In this case, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor induced an inadequate response, and the right knee and left hip joints required artificial joint replacement surgery. However, second line treatment with anti-interleukin-6 treatment was effective, and the right elbow joint function was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

We experienced a case of psoriatic arthritis, in which anti-interleukin-6 treatment repaired a bone cyst in the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and enthesitis of the distal interphalangeal joints. The patient is currently in clinical remission with no restrictions in daily life activities. Anti-interleukin-6 treatment may address the unmet needs of patients with psoriatic arthritis who are resistant or intolerant to antitumor necrosis factor treatment, with rapidly destructive large joints but with well-managed skin manifestations.

Sex- and gender-related differences in psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory musculoskeletal disease with a chronic, progressive course. Various aspects of PsA, including its clinical features, disease course and response to treatment, are influenced by sociodemographic characteristics of the patient. This includes patient sex, the biological attributes associated with being male or female, and gender, a sociocultural construct that comprises attitudes, traits and behaviours associated with being a man or a woman. An understanding of sex- and gender-related differences in PsA, as well as their underlying mechanisms, is therefore important for individualized care. In this narrative review, the influence of sex and gender on PsA manifestation and course, patient function and quality of life, and their association with comorbidities are described. Sex- and gender-related disparities in response to advanced therapies and their potential underlying mechanisms are delineated. Differences in pathophysiological mechanisms between male and female patients including genetics, immune and hormonal mechanisms are discussed. Finally, fertility and pregnancy outcomes in PsA are outlined. By adopting sex and gender lenses, this review is aimed at highlighting key differences between male and female patients with PsA and uncovering mechanisms underlying these differences, ultimately promoting individualized care of men and women with PsA and informing future research in this area.

Psoriatic Spondylitis: A Disease Manifestation in Debate: Evidences to Know for the Clinical Rheumatologist

ABSTRACT

With the advent of classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), patients with axial manifestations associated with psoriasis, initially described in the l950s as a specific entity termed psoriatic spondylitis (PS), are now categorized within PsA, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and axSpA. Thus, different terms are used to describe axial disease in patients with PsA including PS, axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), and psoriatic spondyloarthritis. Patients with PS may present with inflammatory and/or mechanical back pain, but also may display axial disease on imaging despite not complaining of back pain. Cervical spondylitis has been reported in 35% to 75% of patients with PsA. Axial disease is silent in 20% and 25% of patients with axial PsA and PsA, respectively. The majority of axPsA patients have peripheral arthritis alongside the axial involvement, whereas only 2% to 5% of PsA patients have solely axial arthritis with no peripheral arthritis.A debate is currently underway as to whether inflammatory axial disease and psoriasis represent axSpA with psoriasis or a subset of PsA named axPsA. Studies have recognized that axial disease in PsA patients seems to be different demographically, genetically, clinically, and radiographically when compared with AS with or without psoriasis. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge regarding axial involvement of PsA in terms of history, terminology, classification, epidemiology, clinical presentation, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment, with the aim of providing advice for management of PS in clinical evidence-based practice. Data-driven studies are needed to develop clear, nonoverlapping classification criteria for spinal involvement in PsA.

Inflammatory bowel disease manifestations in spondyloarthritis: considerations for the clinician

INTRODUCTION

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are a group of inflammatory arthritis that can involve the spine and/or peripheral joints. Extra-articular manifestations, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are frequently observed within the clinical manifestations of SpA and are part of the SpA classification criteria. Evidence of IBD is observed in about 6-7% of SpA patients, and a silent, microscopic gut inflammation, could be present in up to 50% of patients. From a pathogenetic point of view, dysregulated microbiome and migration of T lymphocytes and other cells from gut to the joint ('gut-joint' axis) has been recognized, in the context of a common genetic background.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to narratively review the recent evidences on the epidemiology, classification, clinical findings, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of IBD in patients with SpA and to provide advices for both rheumatologist and gastroenterologist in the management of IBD in SpA.

EXPERT OPINION

IBD manifestations in SpA frequently increase the burden of the disease and represent a clinical challenge, especially for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of patients affected by those conditions. New treatment strategies targeting both articular and intestinal manifestations are now available and may lead to a better outcome.

Construct validity of the ASAS health index in psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVES

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society health index (ASAS-HI) was designed to assess the global health of patients with spondyloarthritis, but its performance in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is hardly known. We addressed the clinimetric properties of this instrument in patients with PsA.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational study that included 90 consecutive patients with PsA. The measurement properties of ASAS-HI were analysed against the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire. A multivariate analysis was performed to weigh the ASAS-HI items associated with DAPSA active disease and PsAID high impact.

RESULTS

Mean ASAS-HI was 5.8 (4.3). Convergent validity was high both against DAPSA (ρ 0.78, P < 0.0001) and PsAID (ρ 0.80, P < 0.0001). ASAS-HI showed a high discriminant capacity for both DAPSA remission [optimal criterion ≤ 2, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97), P < 0.0001], and low activity [optimal criterion ≤6, AUC 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.94), P < 0.0001]. The ASAS-HI items significantly associated with DAPSA active disease were: 'I find it hard to stand for long' (β 4.48, P < 0.0001), 'I find it hard to concentrate' (β 2.94, P = 0.042) and 'I sleep badly at night' (β 1.86, P = 0.044). As for PsAID, the only item significantly associated with a high impact was 'I sleep badly at night' (β -3.29, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated construct validity of ASAS-HI, a spondyloarthritis instrument, for the assessment of global health in patients with PsA.

Assessment of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in psoriatic arthritis: association with disease activity and quality of life indices

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the discriminant capability of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) according to disease activity, remission/low disease activity indices and quality of life indices in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

Consecutive patients with PsA were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. At each visit, the patients underwent a complete physical examination and their clinical/laboratory data were collected. Disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and remission/low disease activity using the DAPSA minimal disease activity (MDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA) criteria. The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores were also collected. Finally, PASS was assessed by asking all patients to answer yes or no to a single question.

Results

Patients who answered yes to PASS showed a significantly better overall mean DAPSA score than those who were not in PASS. Furthermore, patients in PASS showed a significantly lower level of systemic inflammation, lower Leeds Enthesitis Index score, a significantly lower impact of disease (PsAID), lower pain and better function than patients who answered no to PASS. A moderate to good agreement was found between PASS, MDA, DAPSA low disease activity and PsAID score ≤4. Good sensitivity and specificity were found with PASS with respect to DAPSA low disease activity, and although PASS is sensitive in the identification of patients with MDA, DAPSA remission and VLDA it lacks of specificity.

Discussion

This study showed that PASS might be used as an alternative to determine disease activity in patients with PsA in real clinical practice, mainly in patients with low disease activity according to DAPSA criteria.

Effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF therapy for ankylosing spondylitis: a real-world study

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF drugs for ankylosing spondylitis. Materials & methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at a pharmacy in the Brazilian Public Health System. Effectiveness by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, functionality by Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, quality of life by European Quality of Life Five-Dimensions and safety was assessed at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: About 160 patients started the treatment with adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab. There was a statistically significant improvement in disease activity, functionality and quality of life at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This real-world study has shown that anti-TNF drugs are effective and well tolerated for ankylosing spondylitis patients.

New Insights in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Review

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex, multiform and chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the association of psoriasis and arthritis with other musculoskeletal and extra-articular manifestations. The treatment of PsA is rapidly evolving due to the introduction of new biologic and small-molecule drugs, and the aim of treatment is to induce a condition of remission or low disease activity in all disease domains. However, unmet treatment needs still persist for those patients with impaired function, reduced quality of life or comorbidities. In this context, physical therapy and rehabilitation could provide additional benefits by reducing disease activity and improving function. Although a large number of studies have assessed the role of physical therapy and exercise in other forms of chronic inflammatory arthritis, such as axial spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, evidence on their effect on persons with PsA is still lacking. However, some studies have reported the potential positive role of physical therapy on the different disease domains of PsA, in helping to improve disease activity, prevent or improve articular impairment, improve pain management and improve quality of life. Here, we review current evidence on physical therapy, exercise and rehabilitation in patients with PsA. In particular, we review the literature focusing on each domain, to provide evidence of efficacy and effectiveness of exercise and rehabilitation on skin, peripheral arthritis, axial involvement, dactylitis, enthesitis and comorbidities.

A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains

Introduction: Several new treatments have been developed for psoriatic disease, an inflammatory condition that involves skin and joints. Notwithstanding, few studies have made direct comparisons between treatments and therefore it is difficult to select the ideal treatment for an individual patient. The aim of this systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) was to analyze available and approved biologic therapies for each domain of psoriatic disease: skin, peripheral arthritis, axial arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and nail involvement. Methods: Data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE database (July 2020) using PICO criteria. Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of biological therapy in terms of the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR, 24 weeks) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI, 10-16 weeks). Results: Fifty-four RCTs were included in the systematic review. Due to the design of the RCTs, namely, outcomes and time points, network meta-analysis was performed for skin and peripheral arthritis domains. For the skin domain, 30 studies reporting PASI100 were included. The peripheral arthritis domain was analyzed through ACR70 in 12 studies. From the therapies approved for both domains, secukinumab and ixekizumab were the ones with the highest probability of reaching the proposed outcomes. There is a lack of outcome uniformization in the dactylitis, enthesitis, and nail domains, and therefore, an objective comparison of the studies was not feasible. Nevertheless, secukinumab was the treatment with the best compromise between the number of studies in each domain and the results obtained in the different outcomes. Conclusion: Secukinumab and ixekizumab were the treatments with the highest probability of reaching both PASI100 and ACR70 outcomes. Due to the lack of a standard evaluation of outcomes of the other psoriatic disease domains, a network meta-analysis for all the domains was not possible to perform.

Assessment of Widespread and Extraarticular Pain in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Case-control Study

OBJECTIVE

A remarkable lack of detailed knowledge on pain areas in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is present, and their clinical relevance is quite unknown. The main aim of the study was to explore pain areas in PsA, comparing them with those involved in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). In addition, a secondary aim was to investigate any possible association between pain areas and outcome measures in PsA.

METHODS

This was a case-control study on patients with PsA satisfying Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis criteria and patients with FM. In all patients with PsA and FM, a body chart filled in by the patient reporting pain areas in 80 body locations was performed. The Widespread Pain Index (WPI) was performed in all patients with PsA and FM. In all patients with PsA, an assessment of disease activity, treatment target, function, and impact of disease was carried out.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with PsA and 50 FM controls were evaluated. A significantly higher number of pain areas in the body chart and higher WPI scores were found in patients with FM when compared to patients with PsA. In PsA, the number of areas reported in the body chart significantly correlated with the Disease Activity Index for PsA, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and PsA Impact of Disease. Patients who showed a significantly high number of extraarticular pain areas involved were those who were not in remission/minimal disease activity, or who did not have a greater impact of disease or reduced function.

CONCLUSION

The main results showed that widespread and extraarticular pain was present in patients with PsA, showing that this nonarticular pain had an impact on important disease domains. The present study could contribute to an important aspect of this challenging and multifaceted disease-namely, the assessment of widespread pain.

Performance and Predictors of Minimal Disease Activity Response in Peripheral Spondyloarthritis Patients Treated With Adalimumab

OBJECTIVES

To examine concurrent validity and discrimination of modified minimal disease activity (mMDA) criteria in peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) following OMERACT filter principles and determine predictors of mMDA response.

METHODS

Four mMDA versions were derived in the ABILITY-2 study using the SPondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) or Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) but excluding psoriasis. To assess concurrent validity, mMDA versions were correlated with Peripheral SpondyloArthritis Response Criteria (PSpARC) remission, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score for inactive disease (ASDAS ID), and physician global. Treatment discrimination was assessed between adalimumab and placebo at week 12. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine baseline predictors of long-term mMDA responses and sustained mMDA.

RESULTS

The four mMDA versions showed a stronger positive correlation with PSpARC remission (r_tet >0.95) versus ASDAS ID (r_tet >0.75) at week 12 and years 1-3 and were able to show discrimination (p<0.001). Responsiveness was shown at week 12; significantly more patients receiving adalimumab versus placebo achieved all four versions of mMDA. Approximately 40-60% of adalimumab-treated patients achieved mMDA-LEI or SPARCC at years 1-3. Achieving mMDA response after 12 weeks of adalimumab treatment was a robust positive predictor of attaining long-term mMDA through 3 years (odds ratios: 11.38-27.13 for mMDA-LEI; 17.98-37.85 for mMDA-SPARCC).

CONCLUSIONS

All four versions of mMDA showed concurrent validity and discriminated well between adalimumab and placebo treatment groups. Early mMDA response is a more consistent predictor of long-term mMDA achievement than baseline characteristics. The 5 of 6 versions of mMDA could be an appropriate treatment target in pSpA patients.

Axial Psoriatic Arthritis: A Distinct Clinical Entity in Search of a Definition

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis is a well-recognized manifestation with a prevalence between 12.5% and 78%. This huge heterogeneity is due to the different criteria used by authors to define psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement combining clinical features with radiographic evidence of disease. Specific genetic and clinical attributes of axial psoriatic arthritis might differentiate it from axial spondyloarthritis with concurrent skin psoriasis. Few studies address the specific management. The purpose of this review is to acknowledge the current understanding of axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis and highlight the need for a definition to facilitate research and clinical recognition.

Prognostic factors of good response to DMARDs in psoriatic arthritis: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

The management of Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has evolved in the last decade with a significant increase in treatment options making the choice for clinicians difficult. Thus, the different factors of good prognosis for each treatment are presented in this review.

AREAS COVERED

Current available treatment and assessment tools for the response of treatment are presented. A systematic review of the literature, on Pubmed, Medline and Cochrane databases and abstracts from the last three EULAR and ACR annual conferences was performed. Factors associated with a good response to csDMARDs, tsDMARDs and bDMARDs are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Dactylitis and axial involvement are associated with a poor response to methotrexate. Leflunomide has shown better efficacy in the presence of established polyarticular involvement. TNF inhibitors are to be preferred in young men with an elevated CRP while obesity, high disease activity and long disease duration are factors associated with poor response. Apremilast and ustekinumab are more effective in mono and oligo articular disease. Abatacept is more effective in patients with high CRP, high disease activity and polyarticular involvement. Finally, there are no available data with the anti IL17 These factors are some arguments to help clinicians, but comparative study are needed to conclude.

Secukinumab efficacy on resolution of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies

Background

Enthesitis is one of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. Patients with enthesitis are associated with worse outcomes than those without enthesitis. The effect of secukinumab on the resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA was explored using pooled data from the FUTURE 2 and 3 studies.

Method

Assessments of enthesitis through week 104 used the Leeds Enthesitis Index. These post hoc analyses included resolution of enthesitis count (EC = 0), median time to first resolution of enthesitis (Kaplan-Meϊer estimate), and shift analysis (as observed) of baseline EC (1, 2, or 3–6) to full resolution (FR), stable (similar or reduction of EC), or worse (EC > baseline). Efficacy outcomes (ACR, PASI, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and DAS28-CRP) were assessed in patients with or without baseline enthesitis. Results are reported for secukinumab 300 and 150 mg in the overall population and by prior TNFi treatment.

Results

A total of 65% (466/712) of patients had baseline enthesitis. In the overall population, FR was achieved as early as week 16 in 65% (300 mg) and 56% (150 mg) versus 44% (placebo) patients, with further improvements to 91% (300 mg) and 88% (150 mg) at week 104. The majority (89%) of patients without enthesitis at baseline maintained this status at week 104. Median days to resolution of EC were shorter with secukinumab 300 and 150 mg versus placebo (57 and 85 vs 167 days, respectively). In patients with EC of 1 or 2, shift analysis from baseline to week 24 showed that more patients achieved FR with secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, whereas no difference between secukinumab and placebo was shown in the more severe patients with EC of 3–6. Increases in proportions of patients with FR were observed with secukinumab irrespective of the severity of EC from baseline to week 104. Improvements in efficacy outcomes were similar in patients with or without enthesitis treated with secukinumab 300 mg.

Conclusion

Secukinumab provided early and sustained resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA over 2 years. Secukinumab 300 mg provided higher resolution than 150 mg in patients with more severe baseline EC and showed similar overall efficacy in patients with or without enthesitis.

Trial registration

FUTURE 2: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01752634 (date of study registration: December 19, 2012), and EudraCT, 2012-004439-22 (date of study registration: December 12, 2012)

FUTURE 3: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989468 (date of study registration: November 21, 2013), and EudraCT, 2013-004002-25 (date of study registration: December 17, 2013)

TNF-alpha inhibitors for the six treatment targets of psoriatic arthritis

Introduction: Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by psoriasis, synovitis, enthesitis, spondylitis, and association with extra-articular manifestations and comorbidities. Treatment of PsA dramatically changed since the introduction of anti-TNF drugs which have shown to reduce the symptoms and signs of the disease and slow the radiographic progression. Despite the introduction of new molecules with different mechanisms of action, the role of anti-TNF in the treatment of all disease manifestations of this intriguing disease is still central.Areas covered: The aim of this paper is to review the role of anti-TNF drugs in the treatment of different disease domains in PsA (peripheral and axial joints, skin, enthesis, patient's reported outcomes, extra-articular manifestations), reporting data from randomized clinical trials and observational studies. An extensive literature search was performed on PubMed, with no limits or filters. The following search terms were used: 'anti-TNF', 'Psoriatic Arthritis'.Expert opinion: Despite the emergence of different new treatments, anti-TNF therapy remains central in the management of all disease domains in PsA patients.

Residual Disease Activity and Associated Factors in Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Remission or low disease activity should be the treatment target of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, residual disease activity (RDA) in some domains could persist. The aim of this study was to assess RDA and its associated factors in a group of patients with PsA.

METHODS

Patients with PsA were enrolled if they satisfied ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria with > 6 months' followup and achieved a status of low disease activity (LDA), minimal disease activity (MDA), or remission [Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA) remission or very low disease activity (VLDA)]. RDA was assessed by the percentage of patients who had, although in LDA or remission, tender and/or swollen joints > 1, Leeds Enthesitis Index > 1, Health Assessment Questionnaire > 0.5, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) > 1, patient's global assessment > 20, physician visual analog scale (VAS) > 20, and VAS pain > 15. Associated factors of RDA were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 113 enrolled patients, 78 (69%) were in MDA. Moreover, DAPSA remission was observed in 46 (40.7%) while VLDA only in 32 (28.3%) of patients with PsA. VLDA seems to be the most stringent criterion, with a minimal RDA only in the VAS physician in 1 patient (3.1%) and none in the different domains, while patients in MDA had RDA in tender joints (14.1%), VAS pain (29.4%) and PASI > 1 or body surface area (BSA) > 3% (17.9%). Of note, although patients in DAPSA remission show a very low rate of RDA in almost all domains, 12 (26%) of them show a PASI > 1 or BSA > 3%. Finally, LDA shows RDA in higher percentages, mainly in patient-reported outcomes, tender joints, and skin domain.

CONCLUSION

RDA can be recognized in patients with PsA. VLDA seems to be the most stringent composite index to identify patients in the absence of RDA.

Prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity in Real-world Studies and Randomized Clinical Trials: Systematic Review with Metaanalysis

Objective.

To estimate the frequency of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) status in real-world studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT).

Methods.

A systematic literature search for 2009–2017 was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. Study selection and data extraction were performed by 2 independent researchers. Random-effects single-arm metaanalyses were performed and heterogeneity was assessed using I2.

Results.

A total of 405 records were identified and 45 studies were analyzed: 39 (86.7%) observational studies and 6 (13.3%) RCT; they included 12,469 patients. The overall prevalence of MDA in cross-sectional studies was 35% (95% CI 30%–41%, I2 = 94%), varying from 17% (95% CI 7%–34%) in patients taking synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) to 57% (95% CI 41%–71%) in those taking biological DMARD. Prevalence of MDA in cohort studies increased with longer followup time, ranging from 25% (95% CI 15%–40%) with 3- to 4-month followup to 42% (95% CI 38%–45%) with > 24-month followup. Patients with PsA receiving biological DMARD in a real-world context and RCT had similar prevalence of MDA at 6-month followup: 30% (95% CI 21%–41%, I2 = 85%) versus 32% (95% CI 26%–39%, I2 = 79%), respectively.

Conclusion.

Patients with PsA included in real-world studies had similar prevalence of MDA compared to those in controlled clinical trials. This finding suggests that MDA is a useful treatment target for PsA in the real-world setting.

Axial disease in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: a critical comparison

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) was first identified in the late 17th century. 250 years later, inflammatory spine disease was recognized to be one of the patterns of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Isolated spondylitis is rare among patients with PsA, occurring in less than 5% of patients; however, many patients with PsA have axial disease that is concurrent with peripheral arthritis. At the other end of the spondyloarthritis spectrum, psoriasis is observed in 10% of patients with AS. Although axial involvement in PsA can be indistinguishable from axial disease in AS, it can also differ in several respects, raising the question of whether axial PsA and AS (with or without psoriasis) are different clinical presentations of the same disease, or whether they are separate diseases that have overlapping features. In this Review, the clinical presentation, metrology, radiographic characteristics, genetic factors, treatment options and axial prognosis of the two diseases are addressed. The aim of this Review is to capture all available comparisons made to date, to highlight the similarities and differences between AS and axial PsA and to propose a research agenda.

Sustained Very Low Disease Activity and Remission in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients

Introduction

Sustained remission should be considered the main therapeutic target in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Very low disease activity (VLDA) and a DAPSA score ≤ 4 are the most commonly used criteria. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the rate of sustained remission in a group of PsA patients followed in a real-life setting.

Methods

All PsA patients satisfying CASPAR criteria were followed prospectively every 3–6 months, in a context of clinical practice by January 2013. Sustained remission was defined when patients achieved a DAPSA score ≤ 4 and/or VLDA for at least 12 months. The exclusion criterion was the presence of a condition of VLDA or DAPSA ≤ 4 at the baseline assessment. Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the survival of patients.

Results

A total of 147 PsA patients were evaluated for the study. Of these, 80 performed at least 12 consecutive months of follow-up. The average duration of follow-up was 24 months (range, 12–60 months). At the last follow-up, 22 patients were on csDMARDs treatment while 58 patients were on bDMARDs. Of the 80 patients, 14 (17.5%) achieved a sustained VLDA while 24 (30%) achieved sustained remission according to the DAPSA criteria. The mean duration of remission in patients achieving VLDA and DAPSA ≤ 4 was 17 months for both criteria. High baseline levels of CRP, shorter disease duration, and less pain at baseline were found to be predictors of sustained VLDA and DAPSA remission.

Conclusions

In our study, based on clinical practice, a sustained VLDA was achieved in 17.5% and a sustained remission according to the DAPSA criteria in 30% of patients with PsA.

Minimal disease activity is a stable measure of therapeutic response in psoriatic arthritis patients receiving treatment with adalimumab

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate minimal disease activity (MDA) assessments in patients with PsA during routine clinical care.

Methods

We used data from a multicentre observational study of patients with active PsA who initiated treatment with adalimumab during routine clinical practice and continued treatment for at least 6 months to evaluate achievement of MDA, individual MDA criteria (modified to conform to study assessments) and ACR responses during 24 months of therapy. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between MDA and individual criteria at month 6; regression models were used to determine the influence of baseline MDA criteria on achievement of MDA at month 6.

Results

A total of 1684 patients were included in these analyses; most had long-standing disease. MDA was achieved by 597 patients (35.5%) at month 6. This proportion increased to 45.5% at month 24 in patients remaining on therapy. MDA status was stable over time; >75% of patients with MDA at month 6 recorded MDA at subsequent visits. Pain was the most difficult individual criterion to achieve, and enthesitis was the least difficult. Higher functional status and fewer tender joints at baseline predicted achievement of MDA at month 6. About half of patients (51.5%) with an ACR20 response at month 6 achieved MDA.

Conclusion

In this observational cohort of patients with long-standing disease, MDA provided a stable and valid assessment of clinical status over 24 months.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01111240.

Unmet Needs in Axial Spondyloarthritis

During the past decade, the well-known disease called ankylosing spondylitis has come to be considered as a subset of the broader entity referred as axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), which also includes non-radiographic axSpA. The need of this new classification was aimed to improve the sensitivity for an early diagnosis, to reduce diagnostic delay, and to allow an early treatment. Although there is improvement in the recognition, the management of patients, and the treatment strategies of axSpA, unmet needs persist. There is still a substantial gap of 5-8 years between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis of axSpA and, even in patients diagnosed early, 20-40% of them do not respond or have a loss of response to anti-TNF treatment. Moreover, the pathogenesis of the disease and, in particular, the mechanisms of new bone formation are far to be completely understood. Nevertheless, the discovery of IL-23/IL-17 axis with the development of biologic inhibitors, the identification of new subsets of effector cells, together with the interest in the detection of potential biomarkers of bone formation brought the approach to axSpA into a new era. This review is intended to enhance awareness and understanding of axSpA and to identify and discuss the current unmet needs in axSpA, including diagnosis, classification, biomarkers, pathogenesis, management, and treatment strategies.

Change in PsAID-12 scores in patients continuing or discontinuing anti-TNF treatments in psoriatic arthritis: results from the HUR-BIO biologic registry

OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item questionnaire (PsAID-12) has been developed to be used in psoriatic arthritis in daily practice. The aim of the present study was to assess the change values of PsAID-12 in PsA patients continuing or discontinuing anti-TNF treatment.

METHODS

We recruited patients from the Hacettepe University biological database (HUR-BIO). Overall, 70 PsA patients had PsAID-12 score before the initiation of the first anti-TNF treatment. Stopping or switching the anti-TNF treatment due to inefficacy was definitely considered a negative response. Changes were evaluated by the comparison with the baseline PsAID-12 score in compliance with the favorable and unfavorable responses to anti-TNF treatments. The standardized response mean (SRM) was used for determining the response.

RESULTS

Seventy (78.6% female) patients were analyzed and their mean age was 45.5 years (12.0 years). The mean follow-up duration was 18.3 months (12.6 months). At baseline, the mean PsAID-12 score was 6.6 (1.5). Physicians stopped or switched the treatment in 28 patients (40.0%) due to the inefficacy of anti-TNF treatment. The ΔPsAID-12 score was 0.25 (1.71) in the patients discontinuing anti-TNF treatment and 3.52 (2.31) in the patients continuing their anti-TNF treatment (p < 0.001). The SRM scores higher for PsAID-12, particularly in the well response to anti-TNF treatments.

CONCLUSION

A decrease of 3.5 units in PsAID-12 score shows a favorable response to anti-TNF treatment. Changes in PsAID-12 score had well discrimination capacity for anti-TNF treatments.

Prevalence of minimal disease activity in Australian patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Assessing the outcome of national funding criteria for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug prescribing

AIM

Discrepancies exist between international treatment guidelines and current Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) criteria for funding biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) prescribing in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to determine the prevalence of minimal disease activity (MDA) achievement and differences in inflammatory marker levels between PsA patients who have and have not met the Australian PBS criteria for bDMARDs.

METHOD

Consecutive participants diagnosed with PsA were assessed for MDA components and serum inflammatory markers. For those on bDMARDs, joint counts and inflammatory markers at the time of bDMARD qualification were compared with matched rheumatoid arthritis (RA) controls.

RESULTS

Minimal disease activity was achieved by 56/105 participants overall. There were no differences in inflammatory marker levels or involved joint count patterns between the PsA and RA groups at the time of bDMARD qualification. Seventy-three percent of the 53 PsA patients on bDMARD achieved MDA, vs 33% in the non-bDMARD group (P < 0.001). More bDMARD than non-bDMARD patients achieved four out of seven MDA components. Of those with any enthesitis, its prevalence was higher in the non-bDMARD group (22 vs 10, P = 0.009). Regardless of treatment, there was no difference in inflammatory marker levels between those who did and did not achieve MDA.

CONCLUSION

The Australian PBS criteria, funding bDMARD prescribing for PsA, select well for MDA achievers. A high prevalence of MDA non-achievement remains in patients ineligible for bDMARD funding, and enthesitis in this population is more common. Inflammatory markers were not discriminators between treatment or MDA achievement groups.

Considerations for the definition of remission criteria in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an autoimmune disease that can cause progressive structural damage of the joints and irreversible disability. The potentially achievable results of biologic therapy for PsA has led to the view that disease remission should be the goal of treatment. However, the heterogeneity of disease manifestations and need for validated outcome measures makes defining remission in PsA challenging. This article evaluates proposed criteria for defining remission in PsA and discusses how these criteria can be applied in clinical practice.

METHODS

A primary literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify articles discussing potential PsA treatment goals or targets, including minimal disease activity. English-language publications from the last 10 years were included in this assessment.

RESULTS

There are 5 clinical domains in PsA that must be considered when evaluating remission: synovitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, spondylitis, and psoriasis/nail psoriasis. Due to variability in the completeness of remission and time to achieve remission with different therapies between these domains, remission should be measured clinically through a combination of objective measures, or a composite assessment tool. Composite measures are more efficient than unidimensional instruments in measuring remission, but remission rates differ between the available composite indices.

CONCLUSION

Although the concept of remission as a treatment goal in PsA is gaining acceptance among rheumatologists, further work is necessary to develop a broadly acceptable definition of remission.

Prediction and benefits of minimal disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis and active skin disease in the ADEPT trial

Objectives

To determine the proportion of patients with psoriatic arthritis in the Adalimumab Effectiveness in Psoriatic Arthritis trial achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) and its individual components at 1 or more visits over 144 weeks, identify baseline predictors of MDA achievement, and evaluate the association of MDA status with independent quality of life (QoL)-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the baseline characteristics that predicted achievement of MDA at individual time points (weeks 12 through 144) or sustained MDA (achievement of MDA at 2 consecutive time points 12 weeks apart). The association of independent QoL-related PROs with MDA achievement was evaluated at weeks 24 and 144.

Results

In univariate analyses, higher baseline patient assessment of pain, tender joint count (TJC), enthesitis and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score were significantly associated with lower likelihood of achieving MDA at later time points. Multivariate analyses confirmed higher baseline HAQ-DI as a significant predictor for failure to achieve MDA at later time points. Achievement of sustained MDA was associated with lower baseline TJC and HAQ-DI score. Achievement of different MDA components appeared to be treatment dependent. MDA achievers had significantly better QoL-related PROs and greater improvements in PROs from baseline to week 24 compared with non-achievers.

Conclusions

Higher HAQ-DI score was the most consistent baseline factor that decreased the likelihood of achieving MDA and sustained MDA at later time points. Achieving MDA was associated with better independent QoL-related PROs.

Elderly psoriatic arthritis patients on TNF-α blockers: results of an Italian multicenter study on minimal disease activity and drug discontinuation rate

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthropathy, associated with skin and/or nail psoriasis. Real world data on efficacy and safety of TNF-α blockers in the elderly with PsA are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, through the achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA), drug discontinuation rate, and safety in elderly patients with PsA on TNF-α blockers. A multicenter, observational study was carried out in four Italian centers. The assessment of disease activity and safety were performed at the start of anti-TNF-α (T0), at 6 months (T6) and at 12 months (T12). A total of 145 PsA patients were included in the study. At baseline 68 (46.9%) patients were on etanercept, 60 (41.3%) on adalimumab, 11 (7.6%) on golimumab, and 6 (4.1%) on infliximab. All the variables concerning PsA activity showed a statistically significant improvement when comparing T6 and T12 with T0. After 6 and 12 months of therapy, respectively, 31 (22.6%) and 71 (51.8%) patients achieved MDA (p < 0.001). The drug discontinuation rate was 5.5% with a mean of 6.8 months (range 2-10 months), and it was due to lack of efficacy, adverse events, and lost to follow-up. Nine patients (6.2%) reported the onset of mild infections resolved with antimicrobial specific oral regimen without therapy interruption. TNF-α blockers are effective in the achievement of a low disease status and safe in elderly patients with PsA. Therefore, age should not be considered a limitation to their use.

Comparison of Composite Indices Tailored for Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with csDMARD and bDMARD: A Cross-sectional Analysis of a Longitudinal Cohort

OBJECTIVE

In a complex disease such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), several methods are available to define remission or low disease activity (LDA), including the assessment of different clinical features. The aim of this study was to compare the composite indices tailored for PsA in patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and biological DMARD (bDMARD).

METHODS

Patients with PsA classified with the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis criteria and with > 6 months followup treated with first csDMARD and bDMARD were consecutively enrolled. To assess disease activity, composite indices tailored for PsA were used, such as the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), minimal disease activity (MDA) 5/7, and MDA 7/7. DAPSA and cDAPSA score ≤ 4, MDA 7/7, and PASDAS ≤ 1.9 identified remission. MDA 5/7, DAPSA score ≤ 14, cDAPSA score ≤ 13, and PASDAS < 3.2 identified the MDA and LDA criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients with PsA were enrolled: 79 patients were receiving stable treatment with bDMARD and 30 with csDMARD. Overall, 28 (25.6%), 23 (21.1%), 19 (17.4%), and 13 patients (11.9%) were in cDAPSA remission, DAPSA remission, MDA 7/7, and PASDAS ≤ 1.9, respectively. Moreover, 54 (49.5%), 80 (73.3%), 79 (72.3%), and 38 patients (34.8%) were in MDA 5/7, DAPSA LDA, cDAPSA LDA, and PASDAS LDA. Patients treated with bDMARD had significantly lower median DAPSA, cDAPSA, and PASDAS score than patients treated with csDMARD.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PsA receiving bDMARD are more likely to achieve a status of MDA and remission when compared with csDMARD. PASDAS ≤ 1.9 and MDA 7/7 seem to be stringent remission criteria.

Minimal disease activity and impact of disease in psoriatic arthritis: a Spanish cross-sectional multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) experience functional impairment and reduced quality of life, and thus patient global assessment in PsA is explained mainly by the physical, but also by the psychological, aspect of the disease. To assess the prevalence of minimal disease activity (MDA) in Spanish patients with PsA, we examined their characteristics and the association between MDA and the impact of the disease as assessed by the PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicenter study was carried out in patients who fulfilled the Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria with at least 1 year of disease duration, and who were treated with biological or conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) according to routine clinical practice in Spain. Patients were considered in MDA if they met at least 5/7 of the MDA criteria. The association between MDA and the recently developed PsAID questionnaire was also recorded.

RESULTS

Of 227 patients included, 133 (58.6%) were in the MDA state (52% with antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)α monotherapy, 24% with csDMARD monotherapy, and 24% with anti-TNFα in combination with csDMARD). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, male gender (odds ratio (OR) 2.74, p = 0.001), a sedentary lifestyle (OR 3.13, p = 0.002), familial history of PsA (OR 0.38, p = 0.036), C-reactive protein (CRP) level (OR 0.92, p = 0.010), and use of corticoids (OR 0.33, p = 0.007) were considered features related to MDA. MDA patients had a significantly lower impact of the disease according to PsAID (mean total score (SD): MDA 3.3 (3.1) vs. non-MDA 7.1 (5.2); p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 60% of Spanish PsA patients achieve MDA in routine clinical practice. MDA remains one of the most useful therapeutic targets for PsA since patients who reached this state also had a significantly lower impact of disease according to PsAID.

Biologic Therapies for Autoimmune and Connective Tissue Diseases

Biologic therapy continues to revolutionize the treatment of autoimmune disease, especially in rheumatology as the pathophysiology of both inflammation and autoimmune disease becomes better understood. These therapies are designed to dampen the response of the inflammatory cascades. Although the first biologic therapies were approved many years ago, expanding indications and new agents continue to challenge the traditional treatment strategies for rheumatic diseases. This article reviews the data supporting the current use of biologic therapies, including off-label indications, in a subset of rheumatic diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, inflammatory myositis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, vasculitis, and gout.

Secukinumab for ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

The treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) positively changed since the introduction of anti-TNFα drugs. These treatments were shown to reduce the symptoms and signs of the diseases and improve the quality of life. However, a variable percentage of patients do not respond to anti-TNFα or can exhibit a loss of response and, furthermore, despite anti-TNFα drugs' proven efficacy in reducing peripheral radiographic progression in PsA, the impact in reducing radiographic damage in AS is still debated. Recently, the discovery of new pathogenic mechanisms paved the way to the development of new drugs that target other pro-inflammatory cytokines. In particular, the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-17, which is the principal cytokine produced by Th17 lymphocytes, a pro-inflammatory subset involved in both inflammation and new bone formation in AS and PsA, demonstrated promising results. The new molecule secukinumab, an IL-17A inhibitor, showed its efficacy and safety in phase III randomized clinical trials in AS and PsA and is the first non-anti-TNFα biologic approved for the treatment of AS, providing a useful alternative treatment strategy in both diseases. The aim of this article was to review the pathophysiological basis, the efficacy and the safety of secukinumab treatment in AS and PsA patients.