Fragility Fractures Are Associated with an Increased Risk for Cardiovascular Events in Women and Men with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-based Study

Validating the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Score in a US Population-Based Study of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) algorithm for risk prediction of major osteoporotic and hip fractures accounts for several risk factors, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), since individuals with RA have an excess burden of fractures. FRAX has not been validated in population-based RA cohorts in the US. We aimed to determine the accuracy of FRAX predictions for individuals with RA in the US.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based cohort study included residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who were followed until death, migration, or last medical record review. Each patient with RA (1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria met in 1980-2007, age 40-89 years) was matched 1:1 on age and sex to an individual without RA from the same underlying population. Ten-year predictions for major osteoporotic and hip fractures were estimated using the FRAX tool. Fractures were ascertained through follow-up, truncated at 10 years. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% CI were calculated to compare observed and predicted fractures.

RESULTS

The study included 662 patients with RA and 658 non-RA comparators (66.8% vs 66.9% female and a mean age of 60.6 vs 60.5 years, respectively). Among patients with RA, 76 major osteoporotic fractures and 21 hip fractures were observed during follow-up (median follow-up: 9.0 years) compared to 67.0 predicted major osteoporotic fractures (SIR 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.42) and 23.3 predicted hip fractures (SIR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59-1.38). The observed and predicted major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks were similar for patients with RA and non-RA comparators.

CONCLUSION

The FRAX tool is an accurate method for estimating major osteoporotic and hip fracture risk in patients with RA.

Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Methods to Cluster Comorbidities in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To identify clusters of comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using 4 methods and to compare to patients without RA.

METHODS

In this retrospective, population-based study, residents of 8 Minnesota counties with prevalent RA as of January 1, 2015 were identified. Age-, sex-, and county-matched non-RA comparators were selected from the same underlying population. Diagnostic codes were retrieved for 5 years before January 1, 2015. Using 2 codes ≥30 days apart, 44 previously defined morbidities and 11 nonoverlapping chronic disease categories based on Clinical Classifications Software were defined. Unsupervised machine learning methods of interest included hierarchical clustering, factor analysis, K-means clustering, and network analysis.

RESULTS

Two groups of 1,643 patients with and without RA (72% female; mean age 63.1 years in both groups) were studied. Clustering of comorbidities revealed strong associations among mental/behavioral comorbidities and among cardiovascular risk factors and diseases. The clusters were associated with age and sex. Differences between the 4 clustering methods were driven by comorbidities that are rare and those that were weakly associated with other comorbidities. Common comorbidities tended to group together consistently across approaches. The instability of clusters when using different random seeds or bootstrap sampling impugns the usefulness and reliability of these methods. Clusters of common comorbidities between RA and non-RA cohorts were similar.

CONCLUSION

Despite the higher comorbidity burden in patients with RA compared to the general population, clustering comorbidities did not identify substantial differences in comorbidity patterns between the RA and non-RA cohorts. The instability of clustering methods suggests caution when interpreting clustering using 1 method.

Associations of vascular and bone status in arthritis patients

Cardiovascular (CV) disease and osteoporosis (OP) have been associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Bone and vascular biomarkers and parameters along with the effect of 1-year anti-TNF therapy on these markers were assessed in order to determine correlations between vascular pathophysiology and bone metabolism in RA and AS. Thirty-six patients treated with etanercept or certolizumab pegol and 17 AS patients treated with ETN were included in a 12-month follow-up study. Bone and vascular markers were previously assessed by ELISA. Bone density was measured by DXA and quantitative CT (QCT). Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and pulse-wave velocity (PWV) were assessed by ultrasound. Multiple correlation analyses indicated associations between bone and vascular markers. Osteoprotegerin, sclerostin and cathepsin K were significantly associated with FMD, IMT and PWV, respectively (p < 0.05). Moreover, total and trabecular BMD determined by QCT inversely correlated with IMT (p < 0.05). On the other hand, among vascular parameters, platelet-derived growth factor BB and IMT correlated with DXA femoral and QCT total BMD, respectively (p < 0.05). In the RM-ANOVA analysis, anti-TNF treatment together with baseline osteocalcin, procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) or vitamin D3 levels determined one-year changes in IMT (p < 0.05). In the MANOVA analysis, baseline disease activity indices (DAS28, BASDAI), the one-year changes in these indices, as well as CRP exerted effects on multiple correlations between bone and vascular markers (p < 0.05). As the pattern of interactions between bone and vascular biomarkers differed between baseline and after 12 months, anti-TNF therapy influenced these associations. We found a great number of correlations in our RA and AS patients undergoing anti-TNF therapy. Some of the bone markers have been associated with vascular pathophysiology, while some vascular markers correlated with bone status. In arthritis, systemic inflammation and disease activity may drive both vascular and bone disease.

Multimorbidity Burden in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence and incidence of multimorbidity (MM) in a population-based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to subjects without RA.

METHODS

Between 1999-2013, residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with incident RA who met the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria were compared to age- and sex-matched non-RA subjects from the same population. Twenty-five chronic comorbidities from a combination of the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Indices were included, excluding rheumatic comorbidities. The Aalen-Johansen method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of MM (MM2+; ≥ 2 chronic comorbidities) or substantial MM (MM5+; ≥ 5), adjusting for the competing risk of death.

RESULTS

The study included 597 patients with RA and 594 non-RA subjects (70% female, 90% White, mean age 55.5 yrs). At incidence/index date, the prevalence of MM2+ was higher in RA than non-RA subjects (38% RA vs 32% non-RA, P = 0.02), whereas prevalence of MM5+ was similar (5% RA vs. 4% non-RA, P = 0.68). During follow-up (median 11.6 yrs RA, 11.3 yrs non-RA), more patients with RA developed MM2+ (214 RA vs 188 non-RA; adjusted HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.14-1.69). By 10 years after RA incidence/index, the cumulative incidence of MM2+ was 56.5% among the patients with RA (95% CI 56.5-62.3%) compared with 47.9% among the non-RA (95% CI 42.8-53.7%). Patients with RA showed no evidence of increase in incidence of MM5+ (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.47).

CONCLUSION

Patients with RA have both a higher prevalence of MM at the time of RA incidence as well as increased incidence thereafter.

Ethnic Disparities in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Prevalence Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in the United States: a Systematic Review

Objective

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). General population cohorts have shown African American individuals to have greater and Hispanic Americans to have lower cardiovascular disease prevalence when compared with non‐Hispanic white individuals; however, the reasons for these findings are not clear. This systematic review seeks to describe the incidence and prevalence of ASCVD stratified by race/ethnicity within the US RA population.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that reported incidence or prevalence of ASCVD (including, but not limited to, fatal and nonfatal stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death) in those with RA. Abstracts and full texts were screened separately for inclusion by two reviewers, with a third reviewer to resolve discrepancies.

Results

We screened 2625 abstracts and fully reviewed 138 manuscripts. Twenty‐one were included that cited at a minimum the percentage of non‐Hispanic whites in their population. No publication meeting entry criteria initially stratified ASCVD by race/ethnicity. The average prevalent ASCVD in RA is 46.9% (95% CI: 46.8–47) (range of prevalent ASCVD: 30%‐47%). The average incident ASCVD is 8.2% (95% CI: 8.14–8.25) (range of incident ASCVD 1%–46%).

Conclusion

In this systematic review, we found a paucity of data on racially/ethnically diverse RA patients and ASCVD outcomes. Future studies should report the prevalence of ASCVD in various races/ethnicities with RA in the United States. These data would help inform clinicians on how best to manage cardiovascular disease risk in RA.

Pharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Review of the Literature and Practical Guide

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disabling disease that is associated with increased localized and generalized osteoporosis (OP). Previous studies estimated that approximately one-third of the RA population experience bone loss. Moreover, RA patients suffer from a doubled fracture incidence depending on several clinical factors, such as disease severity, age, glucocorticoid (GC) use, and immobility. As OP fractures are related to impaired quality of life and increased mortality rates, OP has an enormous impact on global health status. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a holistic approach in daily clinical practice. In other words, both OP- and RA-related factors should be taken into account in treatment guidelines for OP in RA. First, to determine the actual fracture risk, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), including vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and calculation of the 10-year fracture risk with FRAX^®, should be performed. In case of high fracture risk, calcium and vitamin D should be supplemented alongside anti-osteoporotic treatment. Importantly, RA treatment should be optimal, aiming at low disease activity or remission. Moreover, GC treatment should be at the lowest possible dose. In this way, good fracture risk management will lead to fracture risk reduction in RA patients. This review provides a practical guide for clinicians regarding pharmacological treatment options in RA patients with OP, taking into account both osteoporotic-related factors and factors related to RA.

Risk of aortic dissection, congestive heart failure, pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with clinical vertebral fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

Studies on the association between clinical vertebral fractures (CVFs) and the subsequent risk of cardiopulmonary diseases, including aortic dissection (AD), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are scarce. Therefore, we used the National Health Insurance Research Database to investigate whether patients with CVF have a heightened risk of subsequent AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS.

DESIGN

The National Health Insurance Research Database was used to investigate whether patients with CVFs have an increased risk of subsequent AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS.

PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study comprised patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of CVF and were hospitalised at any point during 2000-2010 (n=1 08 935). Each CVF patient was frequency-matched to a no-CVF hospitalised patients based on age, sex, index year and comorbidities (n=1 08 935). The Cox proportional hazard regressions model was used to estimate the adjusted effect of CVF on AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS risk.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS was higher in the CVF group than in the no-CVF group (4.85 vs 3.99, 119.1 vs 89.6, 283.3 vs 183.5 and 9.18 vs 4.18/10 000 person-years, respectively). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities and Charlson comorbidity index score, patients with CVF had a 1.23-fold higher risk of AD (95% CI=1.03-1.45), 1.35-fold higher risk of CHF (95% CI=1.30-1.40), 1.57-fold higher risk of pneumonia (95% CI=1.54-1.61) and 2.21-fold higher risk of ARDS (95% CI=1.91-2.57) than did those without CVF. Patients with cervical CVF and SCI were more likely to develop pneumonia and ARDS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that CVFs are associated with an increased risk of subsequent cardiopulmonary diseases. Future investigations are encouraged to delineate the mechanisms underlying this association.

Common mechanisms and holistic care in atherosclerosis and osteoporosis

Cardiovascular (CV) disease and osteoporosis (OP) have become increasing challenges in the aging population and even more in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, and systemic lupus erythematosus. In this review, we discuss how the epidemiology and pathogenesis of CV events and OP are overlapping. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, physical inactivity as conventional risk factors as well as systemic inflammation are among the modifiable risk factors for both CV events and bone loss. In rheumatic patients, systemic “high-grade” inflammation may be the primary driver of accelerated atherogenesis and bone resorption. In the general population, in which some individuals might have low-grade systemic inflammation, a holistic approach to drug treatment and lifestyle modifications may have beneficial effects on the bone as well as the vasculature. In rheumatic patients with accelerated inflammatory atherosclerosis and bone loss, the rapid and effective suppression of inflammation in a treat-to-target regime, aiming at clinical remission, is necessary to effectively control comorbidities.

Atherosclerotic Heart Disease in Women With Autoimmune Rheumatologic Inflammatory Conditions

Women have a higher prevalence of several inflammatory rheumatologic conditions. These include systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) to name a few. These conditions are all associated with higher rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, which is driven primarily by atherosclerotic heart disease. Traditional risk factors are important considerations in the assessment of CV risk in the rheumatologic patient; however, these factors do not appear to impart a similar weight of risk in women with inflammatory autoimmune rheumatologic conditions. In addition, even when controlling for traditional risk factors, patients with RA or SLE continue to have a higher risk of CV events, which has been linked to the burden of systemic inflammation. Currently, the CV risk scoring systems available for the general population underestimate the burden of the problem in these complex patients. The increased CV risk in patients with rheumatologic diseases has been reported in the literature for years but remains underrecognized by internists and cardiologists. Although these conditions themselves are relatively rare, the further study of inflammation and its treatment in CV disease will be beneficial to the general population.

Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs

Osteoporosis is a silent disease with increasing prevalence due to the global ageing population. Decreased bone strength and bone quality is the hallmark of osteoporosis which leads to an increased risk of fragility fractures in elderly. It has been estimated that approximately ~50% of women will suffer during their lifetime from an osteoporotic fracture. This must be considered as a major health concern, as it has previously been established that fragility fracture has been associated with decreased quality of life due to increased disability, more frequent hospital admission and most importantly, osteoporotic fractures have been related to an augmented mortality risk. Anti-osteoporotic drugs are available for improving bone quality. Although there is access to these therapeutic options, there remain multiple unmet needs in the field of osteoporosis and fracture care, for example, the primary prevention of osteoporosis in young individuals (to reach a high peak bone mass), the optimization of the use of imaging techniques [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and new techniques measuring bone quality], the use of nonmedical treatment options and surgical techniques of fracture healing. In this review, we will discuss topics that play a role in the occurrence and prevention of fractures, and we give an overview of and insight into the critical issues and challenges around osteoporosis and fracture prevention.

Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs

Osteoporosis is a silent disease with increasing prevalence due to the global ageing population. Decreased bone strength and bone quality is the hallmark of osteoporosis which leads to an increased risk of fragility fractures in elderly. It has been estimated that approximately ~50% of women will suffer during their lifetime from an osteoporotic fracture. This must be considered as a major health concern, as it has previously been established that fragility fracture has been associated with decreased quality of life due to increased disability, more frequent hospital admission and most importantly, osteoporotic fractures have been related to an augmented mortality risk. Anti-osteoporotic drugs are available for improving bone quality. Although there is access to these therapeutic options, there remain multiple unmet needs in the field of osteoporosis and fracture care, for example, the primary prevention of osteoporosis in young individuals (to reach a high peak bone mass), the optimization of the use of imaging techniques [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and new techniques measuring bone quality], the use of nonmedical treatment options and surgical techniques of fracture healing. In this review, we will discuss topics that play a role in the occurrence and prevention of fractures, and we give an overview of and insight into the critical issues and challenges around osteoporosis and fracture prevention.