1
|
Mousa J, Peterson MN, Crowson CS, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Amin S, Khosla S, Davis JM, Myasoedova E. Validating the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Score in a US Population-Based Study of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:1279-1286. [PMID: 37399469 PMCID: PMC10543611 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2022-1293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) algorithm for risk prediction of major osteoporotic and hip fractures accounts for several risk factors, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), since individuals with RA have an excess burden of fractures. FRAX has not been validated in population-based RA cohorts in the US. We aimed to determine the accuracy of FRAX predictions for individuals with RA in the US. METHODS This retrospective population-based cohort study included residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who were followed until death, migration, or last medical record review. Each patient with RA (1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria met in 1980-2007, age 40-89 years) was matched 1:1 on age and sex to an individual without RA from the same underlying population. Ten-year predictions for major osteoporotic and hip fractures were estimated using the FRAX tool. Fractures were ascertained through follow-up, truncated at 10 years. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% CI were calculated to compare observed and predicted fractures. RESULTS The study included 662 patients with RA and 658 non-RA comparators (66.8% vs 66.9% female and a mean age of 60.6 vs 60.5 years, respectively). Among patients with RA, 76 major osteoporotic fractures and 21 hip fractures were observed during follow-up (median follow-up: 9.0 years) compared to 67.0 predicted major osteoporotic fractures (SIR 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.42) and 23.3 predicted hip fractures (SIR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59-1.38). The observed and predicted major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks were similar for patients with RA and non-RA comparators. CONCLUSION The FRAX tool is an accurate method for estimating major osteoporotic and hip fracture risk in patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jehan Mousa
- J. Mousa, MD, Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Madeline N Peterson
- M.N. Peterson, BS, J.M. Davis III, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Cynthia S Crowson
- C.S. Crowson, PhD, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, and Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sara J Achenbach
- S.J. Achenbach, MS, E.J. Atkinson, MS, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Elizabeth J Atkinson
- S.J. Achenbach, MS, E.J. Atkinson, MS, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shreyasee Amin
- S. Amin, MD, CM, MPH, E. Myasoedova, MD, PhD, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, and Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sundeep Khosla
- S. Khosla, MD, Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John M Davis
- M.N. Peterson, BS, J.M. Davis III, MD, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Elena Myasoedova
- S. Amin, MD, CM, MPH, E. Myasoedova, MD, PhD, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester, and Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crowson CS, Gunderson TM, Davis JM, Myasoedova E, Kronzer VL, Coffey CM, Atkinson EJ. Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Methods to Cluster Comorbidities in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:210-219. [PMID: 35724274 PMCID: PMC9763549 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify clusters of comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using 4 methods and to compare to patients without RA. METHODS In this retrospective, population-based study, residents of 8 Minnesota counties with prevalent RA as of January 1, 2015 were identified. Age-, sex-, and county-matched non-RA comparators were selected from the same underlying population. Diagnostic codes were retrieved for 5 years before January 1, 2015. Using 2 codes ≥30 days apart, 44 previously defined morbidities and 11 nonoverlapping chronic disease categories based on Clinical Classifications Software were defined. Unsupervised machine learning methods of interest included hierarchical clustering, factor analysis, K-means clustering, and network analysis. RESULTS Two groups of 1,643 patients with and without RA (72% female; mean age 63.1 years in both groups) were studied. Clustering of comorbidities revealed strong associations among mental/behavioral comorbidities and among cardiovascular risk factors and diseases. The clusters were associated with age and sex. Differences between the 4 clustering methods were driven by comorbidities that are rare and those that were weakly associated with other comorbidities. Common comorbidities tended to group together consistently across approaches. The instability of clusters when using different random seeds or bootstrap sampling impugns the usefulness and reliability of these methods. Clusters of common comorbidities between RA and non-RA cohorts were similar. CONCLUSION Despite the higher comorbidity burden in patients with RA compared to the general population, clustering comorbidities did not identify substantial differences in comorbidity patterns between the RA and non-RA cohorts. The instability of clustering methods suggests caution when interpreting clustering using 1 method.
Collapse
|
3
|
Associations of vascular and bone status in arthritis patients. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19504. [PMID: 34593938 PMCID: PMC8484288 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99071-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular (CV) disease and osteoporosis (OP) have been associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Bone and vascular biomarkers and parameters along with the effect of 1-year anti-TNF therapy on these markers were assessed in order to determine correlations between vascular pathophysiology and bone metabolism in RA and AS. Thirty-six patients treated with etanercept or certolizumab pegol and 17 AS patients treated with ETN were included in a 12-month follow-up study. Bone and vascular markers were previously assessed by ELISA. Bone density was measured by DXA and quantitative CT (QCT). Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and pulse-wave velocity (PWV) were assessed by ultrasound. Multiple correlation analyses indicated associations between bone and vascular markers. Osteoprotegerin, sclerostin and cathepsin K were significantly associated with FMD, IMT and PWV, respectively (p < 0.05). Moreover, total and trabecular BMD determined by QCT inversely correlated with IMT (p < 0.05). On the other hand, among vascular parameters, platelet-derived growth factor BB and IMT correlated with DXA femoral and QCT total BMD, respectively (p < 0.05). In the RM-ANOVA analysis, anti-TNF treatment together with baseline osteocalcin, procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) or vitamin D3 levels determined one-year changes in IMT (p < 0.05). In the MANOVA analysis, baseline disease activity indices (DAS28, BASDAI), the one-year changes in these indices, as well as CRP exerted effects on multiple correlations between bone and vascular markers (p < 0.05). As the pattern of interactions between bone and vascular biomarkers differed between baseline and after 12 months, anti-TNF therapy influenced these associations. We found a great number of correlations in our RA and AS patients undergoing anti-TNF therapy. Some of the bone markers have been associated with vascular pathophysiology, while some vascular markers correlated with bone status. In arthritis, systemic inflammation and disease activity may drive both vascular and bone disease.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gunderson TM, Myasoedova E, Davis JM, Crowson CS. Multimorbidity Burden in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-based Cohort Study. J Rheumatol 2021; 48:1648-1654. [PMID: 33589552 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence and incidence of multimorbidity (MM) in a population-based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to subjects without RA. METHODS Between 1999-2013, residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with incident RA who met the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria were compared to age- and sex-matched non-RA subjects from the same population. Twenty-five chronic comorbidities from a combination of the Charlson, Elixhauser, and Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Indices were included, excluding rheumatic comorbidities. The Aalen-Johansen method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of MM (MM2+; ≥ 2 chronic comorbidities) or substantial MM (MM5+; ≥ 5), adjusting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS The study included 597 patients with RA and 594 non-RA subjects (70% female, 90% White, mean age 55.5 yrs). At incidence/index date, the prevalence of MM2+ was higher in RA than non-RA subjects (38% RA vs 32% non-RA, P = 0.02), whereas prevalence of MM5+ was similar (5% RA vs. 4% non-RA, P = 0.68). During follow-up (median 11.6 yrs RA, 11.3 yrs non-RA), more patients with RA developed MM2+ (214 RA vs 188 non-RA; adjusted HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.14-1.69). By 10 years after RA incidence/index, the cumulative incidence of MM2+ was 56.5% among the patients with RA (95% CI 56.5-62.3%) compared with 47.9% among the non-RA (95% CI 42.8-53.7%). Patients with RA showed no evidence of increase in incidence of MM5+ (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.47). CONCLUSION Patients with RA have both a higher prevalence of MM at the time of RA incidence as well as increased incidence thereafter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina M Gunderson
- T.M. Gunderson, MS, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | - Elena Myasoedova
- E. Myasoedova, MD, PhD, C.S. Crowson, PhD, Department of Health Sciences Research, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | - John M Davis
- J.M. Davis III, MD, MS, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Cynthia S Crowson
- E. Myasoedova, MD, PhD, C.S. Crowson, PhD, Department of Health Sciences Research, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Daniel CM, Davila L, Makris UE, Mayo H, Caplan L, Davis L, Solow EB. Ethnic Disparities in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Prevalence Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in the United States: a Systematic Review. ACR Open Rheumatol 2020; 2:525-532. [PMID: 32869533 PMCID: PMC7504478 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). General population cohorts have shown African American individuals to have greater and Hispanic Americans to have lower cardiovascular disease prevalence when compared with non‐Hispanic white individuals; however, the reasons for these findings are not clear. This systematic review seeks to describe the incidence and prevalence of ASCVD stratified by race/ethnicity within the US RA population. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that reported incidence or prevalence of ASCVD (including, but not limited to, fatal and nonfatal stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death) in those with RA. Abstracts and full texts were screened separately for inclusion by two reviewers, with a third reviewer to resolve discrepancies. Results We screened 2625 abstracts and fully reviewed 138 manuscripts. Twenty‐one were included that cited at a minimum the percentage of non‐Hispanic whites in their population. No publication meeting entry criteria initially stratified ASCVD by race/ethnicity. The average prevalent ASCVD in RA is 46.9% (95% CI: 46.8–47) (range of prevalent ASCVD: 30%‐47%). The average incident ASCVD is 8.2% (95% CI: 8.14–8.25) (range of incident ASCVD 1%–46%). Conclusion In this systematic review, we found a paucity of data on racially/ethnically diverse RA patients and ASCVD outcomes. Future studies should report the prevalence of ASCVD in various races/ethnicities with RA in the United States. These data would help inform clinicians on how best to manage cardiovascular disease risk in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lesley Davila
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Una E Makris
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas and Medical Service VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas
| | - Helen Mayo
- Health Sciences Digital Library and Learning Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Liron Caplan
- Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado and University of Colorado, Aurora
| | | | - E Blair Solow
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Review of the Literature and Practical Guide. Drugs Aging 2020; 36:1061-1072. [PMID: 31541358 PMCID: PMC6884430 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00714-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disabling disease that is associated with increased localized and generalized osteoporosis (OP). Previous studies estimated that approximately one-third of the RA population experience bone loss. Moreover, RA patients suffer from a doubled fracture incidence depending on several clinical factors, such as disease severity, age, glucocorticoid (GC) use, and immobility. As OP fractures are related to impaired quality of life and increased mortality rates, OP has an enormous impact on global health status. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a holistic approach in daily clinical practice. In other words, both OP- and RA-related factors should be taken into account in treatment guidelines for OP in RA. First, to determine the actual fracture risk, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), including vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and calculation of the 10-year fracture risk with FRAX®, should be performed. In case of high fracture risk, calcium and vitamin D should be supplemented alongside anti-osteoporotic treatment. Importantly, RA treatment should be optimal, aiming at low disease activity or remission. Moreover, GC treatment should be at the lowest possible dose. In this way, good fracture risk management will lead to fracture risk reduction in RA patients. This review provides a practical guide for clinicians regarding pharmacological treatment options in RA patients with OP, taking into account both osteoporotic-related factors and factors related to RA.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee FY, Chen WK, Lin CL, Kao CH, Yang TY, Lai CY. Risk of aortic dissection, congestive heart failure, pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with clinical vertebral fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030939. [PMID: 31753874 PMCID: PMC6886957 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Studies on the association between clinical vertebral fractures (CVFs) and the subsequent risk of cardiopulmonary diseases, including aortic dissection (AD), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are scarce. Therefore, we used the National Health Insurance Research Database to investigate whether patients with CVF have a heightened risk of subsequent AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS. DESIGN The National Health Insurance Research Database was used to investigate whether patients with CVFs have an increased risk of subsequent AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS. PARTICIPANTS This cohort study comprised patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of CVF and were hospitalised at any point during 2000-2010 (n=1 08 935). Each CVF patient was frequency-matched to a no-CVF hospitalised patients based on age, sex, index year and comorbidities (n=1 08 935). The Cox proportional hazard regressions model was used to estimate the adjusted effect of CVF on AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS risk. RESULTS The overall incidence of AD, CHF, pneumonia and ARDS was higher in the CVF group than in the no-CVF group (4.85 vs 3.99, 119.1 vs 89.6, 283.3 vs 183.5 and 9.18 vs 4.18/10 000 person-years, respectively). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities and Charlson comorbidity index score, patients with CVF had a 1.23-fold higher risk of AD (95% CI=1.03-1.45), 1.35-fold higher risk of CHF (95% CI=1.30-1.40), 1.57-fold higher risk of pneumonia (95% CI=1.54-1.61) and 2.21-fold higher risk of ARDS (95% CI=1.91-2.57) than did those without CVF. Patients with cervical CVF and SCI were more likely to develop pneumonia and ARDS. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that CVFs are associated with an increased risk of subsequent cardiopulmonary diseases. Future investigations are encouraged to delineate the mechanisms underlying this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng-You Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Kung Chen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Li Lin
- Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Kao
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Center of Augmented Intelligence in Healthcare, Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Tse-Yen Yang
- Department of Medical Research & Molecular and Genomic Epidemiology Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
- Center for General Education & Master Program of Digital Health Innovation, China Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yuan Lai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Cardiovascular (CV) disease and osteoporosis (OP) have become increasing challenges in the aging population and even more in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, and systemic lupus erythematosus. In this review, we discuss how the epidemiology and pathogenesis of CV events and OP are overlapping. Smoking, diabetes mellitus, physical inactivity as conventional risk factors as well as systemic inflammation are among the modifiable risk factors for both CV events and bone loss. In rheumatic patients, systemic “high-grade” inflammation may be the primary driver of accelerated atherogenesis and bone resorption. In the general population, in which some individuals might have low-grade systemic inflammation, a holistic approach to drug treatment and lifestyle modifications may have beneficial effects on the bone as well as the vasculature. In rheumatic patients with accelerated inflammatory atherosclerosis and bone loss, the rapid and effective suppression of inflammation in a treat-to-target regime, aiming at clinical remission, is necessary to effectively control comorbidities.
Collapse
|
9
|
Atherosclerotic Heart Disease in Women With Autoimmune Rheumatologic Inflammatory Conditions. Can J Cardiol 2018; 34:381-389. [PMID: 29571422 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Women have a higher prevalence of several inflammatory rheumatologic conditions. These include systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic sclerosis (SSc) to name a few. These conditions are all associated with higher rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, which is driven primarily by atherosclerotic heart disease. Traditional risk factors are important considerations in the assessment of CV risk in the rheumatologic patient; however, these factors do not appear to impart a similar weight of risk in women with inflammatory autoimmune rheumatologic conditions. In addition, even when controlling for traditional risk factors, patients with RA or SLE continue to have a higher risk of CV events, which has been linked to the burden of systemic inflammation. Currently, the CV risk scoring systems available for the general population underestimate the burden of the problem in these complex patients. The increased CV risk in patients with rheumatologic diseases has been reported in the literature for years but remains underrecognized by internists and cardiologists. Although these conditions themselves are relatively rare, the further study of inflammation and its treatment in CV disease will be beneficial to the general population.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lems WF, Raterman HG. Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2017. [PMID: 29201155 DOI: 10.1177/https] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a silent disease with increasing prevalence due to the global ageing population. Decreased bone strength and bone quality is the hallmark of osteoporosis which leads to an increased risk of fragility fractures in elderly. It has been estimated that approximately ~50% of women will suffer during their lifetime from an osteoporotic fracture. This must be considered as a major health concern, as it has previously been established that fragility fracture has been associated with decreased quality of life due to increased disability, more frequent hospital admission and most importantly, osteoporotic fractures have been related to an augmented mortality risk. Anti-osteoporotic drugs are available for improving bone quality. Although there is access to these therapeutic options, there remain multiple unmet needs in the field of osteoporosis and fracture care, for example, the primary prevention of osteoporosis in young individuals (to reach a high peak bone mass), the optimization of the use of imaging techniques [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and new techniques measuring bone quality], the use of nonmedical treatment options and surgical techniques of fracture healing. In this review, we will discuss topics that play a role in the occurrence and prevention of fractures, and we give an overview of and insight into the critical issues and challenges around osteoporosis and fracture prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem F Lems
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Centre, VU University Medical Centre and Reade, P.O. Box 7057 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hennie G Raterman
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Centre, VU University Medical Centre and Reade, North West Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lems WF, Raterman HG. Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2017; 9:299-316. [PMID: 29201155 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x17732562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a silent disease with increasing prevalence due to the global ageing population. Decreased bone strength and bone quality is the hallmark of osteoporosis which leads to an increased risk of fragility fractures in elderly. It has been estimated that approximately ~50% of women will suffer during their lifetime from an osteoporotic fracture. This must be considered as a major health concern, as it has previously been established that fragility fracture has been associated with decreased quality of life due to increased disability, more frequent hospital admission and most importantly, osteoporotic fractures have been related to an augmented mortality risk. Anti-osteoporotic drugs are available for improving bone quality. Although there is access to these therapeutic options, there remain multiple unmet needs in the field of osteoporosis and fracture care, for example, the primary prevention of osteoporosis in young individuals (to reach a high peak bone mass), the optimization of the use of imaging techniques [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and new techniques measuring bone quality], the use of nonmedical treatment options and surgical techniques of fracture healing. In this review, we will discuss topics that play a role in the occurrence and prevention of fractures, and we give an overview of and insight into the critical issues and challenges around osteoporosis and fracture prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem F Lems
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Centre, VU University Medical Centre and Reade, P.O. Box 7057 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hennie G Raterman
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Centre, VU University Medical Centre and Reade, North West Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lems WF. Is Fragility Fracture a Strong Risk Factor for a Cardiovascular Event in Rheumatoid Arthritis? The Challenge of Dealing with Multiple Comorbidities. J Rheumatol Suppl 2017; 44:545-546. [PMID: 28461515 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Willem F Lems
- Rheumatologist, Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|