Polypharmacy and Unplanned Hospitalizations in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, and adverse drug reactions among systemic sclerosis patients: A cross-sectional risk factor study

OBJECTIVES

Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDI) and related adverse drug reaction (ADR) are understudied in SSc. The aim of this work was to determine the prevalence and determinants of DDI and ADR in a real-life prospective cohort of SSc patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the drug prescriptions of SSc patients admitted to the daily scleroderma clinic between January 2020 and April 2022. DDI were identified using 2 prescription analysis applications, and adjudicated related ADRs occurring during a one-year follow-up were reported. Risk factors for DDI and ADR were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight SSc patients were included. The median number of medications per patient was 6 [4-9]. Seventy-one (65.7 %) patients had 5 or more medications, and 23 (21.3 %) had 10 or more. Seventy-two (66.7 %) patients had DDIs on their prescriptions at inclusion. Patients with DDIs had more medications than patients without DDIs (7 [5-10] versus 3 [2-5], p < 0.0001). Six (8.3) patients experienced ADRs during the one-year follow-up. Patients with ADRs had more medications (14 [10-18] versus 7 [5-10] p < 0.001) and more DDIs (12 [7-32] versus 3 [1-6]; p < 0.001) than patients without ADRs. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the number of prescribed medications was independently positively associated with DDIs (OR: 2.25 [1.52-3.32], p < 0.0001) as well as with ADRs (OR: 1.68 [1.17-2.40], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SSc patients are significantly exposed to polypharmacy, DDIs and related ADRs, particularly in cases of severe illness, and especially if 5 or more medications are prescribed.

Polypharmacy in Older Patients: A Three-Year Longitudinal Analysis in Primary Care Settings of Aragón, Spain

BACKGROUND

Challenges of polypharmacy and the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in older patients require further investigation. This retrospective study analyzed the progression of polypharmacy and anticholinergic burden in older patients in a primary care setting before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This 3-year cross-sectional study (2019, 2020, and 2021) comprised a dynamic cohort of individuals aged ≥75 years, who attended the Arrabal Primary Care Center in Zaragoza, Spain. Older patients with polypharmacy (≥5 medications) were identified according to their electronic health records. We collected demographic and clinical data, including medication prescriptions, diagnoses, and anticholinergic risks, and performed descriptive and statistical analyses.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 1,928 patients with a mean age of 83.52±0.30 years. Over the 3-year study period, the mean number of medications prescribed increased, from 9.4 in 2019 to 10.4 in 2021. The prevalence of excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications) increased from 39% in 2019 to 45% in 2021. The most commonly prescribed drugs were anilides, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepine derivatives, and platelet aggregation inhibitors. Women had a higher prevalence of illnesses and anticholinergic drug prescriptions than men.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study highlighted an upward trend in polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy among older patients in primary care settings. Future research should focus on optimizing medication management and deprescribing strategies and minimizing the adverse effects of polypharmacy in this population.

Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective product information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Polypharmacy prevalence and associated factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A single-centre, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify factors associated with polypharmacy among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

This single-centre cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing the medical records and questionnaire data of 261 systemic lupus erythematosus patients at a teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Polypharmacy was defined as the regular administration of five or more oral medications; excessive polypharmacy consisted of the regular use of 10 or more oral medications. This study investigated (1) the prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, (2) the distribution of medication types, and (3) the factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients who exhibited polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 70% and 19%, respectively. Polypharmacy was associated with older age, long duration of systemic lupus erythematosus, high disease activity, and administration of glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive agents. Excessive polypharmacy was associated with a higher updated Charlson comorbidity index, history of visits to multiple internal medicine clinics, and presence of public assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus are related to medical aspects such as disease severity and comorbidities in addition to social aspects such as hospital visitation patterns and economic status.

The effect of polypharmacy on rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis treatment: retrospective study

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are chronic, progressive inflammatory diseases that can be accompanied by other diseases. In recent years, with the increase in the lifespan of individuals, the concept of polypharmacy has become more prominent. We aimed to show the prevalence of polypharmacy and the effects of polypharmacy on disease activity in RA and PsA.

Methods

This study included PsA patients who had peripheral joint involvement and, RA patients. Since PsA has a heterogeneous clinical picture, only patients with peripheral joint involvement were included in the study and patients with inflammatory low back pain or radiological sacroiliitis or spondylitis, dactylitis or enthesitis were not included in the study due to homogeneity concerns. The numbers of medications used by the patients at the onset of their treatment and at sixth months into their treatment were recorded. Polypharmacy was accepted as the simultaneous use of at least five medications by the person. The Disease Activity Score 28 joints C-Reactive Protein (DAS-28 CRP) was used to assess disease activity for both disease. The modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores of the patients were calculated based on their chronic diseases.

Results

The sample of the study included 232 RA and 73 PsA patients. Polypharmacy was present at the treatment onset in 115 (49.6%) of the RA patients and 28 (38.4%) of the PsA patients. At the sixth month of treatment, polypharmacy was present in the sixth month of the treatment in 217 (93.5%) RA and 61 (83.6%) PsA patients. The mean ages of the RA and PsA patients who were receiving polypharmacy treatment at the beginning were significantly older than the mean ages of those who were not receiving polypharmacy treatment. In both the RA and PSA groups, the patients with polypharmacy at the beginning had statistically significantly higher DAS-28 CRP scores at six months of treatment than those without polypharmacy at the beginning (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Polypharmacy was present both at the time of diagnosis and in the treatment process in the RA and PsA patients, and the presence of polypharmacy at the beginning of the treatment was among the factors that affected the treatment of these patients by significantly affecting their 6th-month DAS-28 CRP values.

The prevalence and impact of polypharmacy in rheumatology

Polypharmacy is increasingly common in rheumatology due to the complex nature of managing chronic autoimmune diseases. To date there has been limited research into the impact of polypharmacy on rheumatology patients. In this article we reviewed the literature to characterize the prevalence of polypharmacy and its effect on patients. In addition, we have highlighted some key drug-drug interactions to consider involving DMARDs as well as complementary and alternative medicines. There is emerging evidence demonstrating that polypharmacy contributes to adverse outcomes and alters treatment response. This association is best described in RA and is less clear in other patient cohorts. It is also unclear whether polypharmacy is directly harmful or just a surrogate marker for other factors affecting outcomes. Rheumatologists should be aware of the risk of polypharmacy as well as specific drug-drug interactions that can occur in managing chronic autoimmune disease.

Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-centre, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify factors associated with polypharmacy, including social aspects, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We conducted this single-centre, cross-sectional study at a 715-bed regional tertiary care teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Polypharmacy was defined as having five or more medications administered orally regularly, and excessive polypharmacy was defined as having 10 or more medications administered orally regularly. The prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, distribution of medication types, and factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were investigated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

RESULTS

The proportions of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 61% and 15%, respectively, in 991 patients. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with older age (odds ratio, 1.03 and 1.03, respectively), high Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (odds ratio, 1.45 and 2.03, respectively), medication with glucocorticoids (odds ratio, 5.57 and 2.42, respectively), high Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio, 1.28 and 1.36, respectively), and a history of hospitalisation in internal medicine (odds ratio, 1.92 and 1.87, respectively) and visits to other internal medicine clinics (odds ratio, 2.93 and 2.03, respectively). Moreover, excessive polypharmacy was associated with the presence of public assistance (odds ratio, 3.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy are associated with a history of hospitalisation and glucocorticoid medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, medications during hospitalisation should be monitored, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued. Key points • The proportion of polypharmacy (five or more medications administered orally regularly) was 61%. • The proportion of excessive polypharmacy (10 or more medications administered orally regularly) was 15%. • Medications during hospitalisation should be reviewed and examined, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued.

High burden of polypharmacy and comorbidity in persons with psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of claims data, stratified by age and sex

OBJECTIVE

To assess polypharmacy in women and men with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

From the German BARMER health insurance database, 11 984 persons with PsA and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in 2021 were included and compared with sex-matched and age-matched controls without inflammatory arthritis. Medications were analysed by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups. Polypharmacy (≥5 concomitant drugs) was compared by sex, age and comorbidity using the Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) and the Elixhauser Score. The mean difference in the number of medications between persons with PsA and controls was estimated using a linear regression model.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, all ATC drug classes were significantly more frequent in persons with PsA, most commonly musculoskeletal (81% vs 30%), immunomodulatory (56% vs 2.6%), cardiovascular (62% vs 48%), alimentary tract/metabolic (57% vs 31%) and nervous system (50% vs 31%) drugs. Polypharmacy was significantly higher in PsA (49%) compared with controls (17%), more frequent in women (52%) compared with men (45%) and strongly increased with age and comorbidity. For each unit increase of the RDCI, the age-adjusted number of medications increased by 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.01) units in men and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) units in women. Compared with controls, the number of medications in PsA (mean 4.9 (SD 2.8)) was 2.4 (95%CI 2.34; 2.43) units higher in women and 2.3 (95% CI 2.21 to 2.35) units higher in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is common in PsA and is composed of PsA-specific medication as well as frequent medications for comorbidities, equally affecting women and men.

[Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search]

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective specialist subject information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Associations of Polypharmacy With Clinical Parameters, Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess predictors of polypharmacy and its effect on health-related quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed between February and December 2019. The number of medications was grouped into minor (2-4) and major (≥5) polypharmacy. Functional status and quality of life were assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Short-Form 36, respectively. Clinical and demographic characteristics, physical function, and quality of life of the polypharmacy group were compared. Predictive factors for major polypharmacy were evaluated using a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 100 patients (70 females and 30 males) with PsA was 48.43 ± 12.94 years. The proportion of patients with major polypharmacy was 19%. The physical function subscale of Short-Form 36 was lower in the major polypharmacy group ( p = 0.009). Univariable analysis revealed that sex, body mass index, disease duration, disease activity, psoriasis severity, dactylitis, enthesitis, PsA subtypes, smoking, and Health Assessment Questionnaire were not associated with major polypharmacy ( p > 0.10). In the multivariable model, the number of comorbidities (odds ratio, 3.151; 95% confidence interval, 1.828-5.429; p < 0.001) and age ≥60 years (odds ratio, 4.864; 95% confidence interval, 1.159-20.418; p = 0.031) were significantly associated with major polypharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of comorbid diseases and age ≥60 years were the factors associated with major polypharmacy in patients with PsA. Although physical function was not associated with polypharmacy, patients with major polypharmacy had poorer quality of life.

Polypharmacy in Middle-European Rheumatoid Arthritis-Patients: A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Analysis With Systematic Literature Review

Objective: To assess polypharmacy and related medication aspects in Middle-European rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and to discuss the results in view of a systematic literature review.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, charts were reviewed from RA-patients consecutively recruited between September 27, 2017 and April 29, 2019. Drugs were assigned to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) groups as proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Results were compared to those of a systematic literature review.

Results: One hundred seventy-five consecutive RA-patients were included. The mean number of drugs was 6.6 ± 3.5, with 2.4 ± 1.2 drugs taken specifically for RA—compared to 2.6 in the literature. 33.7% of patients experienced polypharmacy defined by ≥5 drugs, compared to 61.6% in the literature–with women affected more frequently than men. After 7 years of follow-up, the number of drugs increased in all ATC-groups by an average of 12.7 %, correlating with age (Corrcoeff = 0.46) and comorbidities (Corrcoeff = 0.599). In the literature, polypharmacy is not always defined precisely, and has not been considered in management guidelines so far.

Conclusion: Polypharmacy is a frequent issue in RA-management. With an increasing number of comorbidities during the course of the disease, polypharmacy becomes even more relevant.

Immunoglobulin D-kappa multiple myeloma in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: a case report and review of the literature

A 77-year-old Japanese woman with a 21-year history of seropositive, erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a 10-year history of methotrexate (MTX) therapy was admitted with malaise and mild consciousness disturbance. Laboratory data showed hypercalcemia, acute kidney injury, normocytic anaemia, and thrombocytopenia. As we first assumed drug-induced toxicity by MTX and eldecalcitol, both were discontinued and leucovorin rescue therapy and calcitonin were administered. However, her condition continued to worsen. Serum protein electrophoresis showed only a small M-peak, immunoelectrophoresis of both the serum and urine demonstrated Bence-Jones kappa (κ) type monoclonal protein without immunoglobulin heavy chain, and bone marrow examination revealed proliferation of plasma cells. We diagnosed her with Bence-Jones κ type multiple myeloma (MM) and transferred her to the department of haematology of a higher order medical institution. Conclusively, the diagnosis of immunoglobulin (Ig) D-κ type MM, a rare variant of this disorder, was determined in accordance with serum immunofixation. Several previous studies have suggested that pre-existing RA is a risk factor for MM. Although IgD MM is characterised by its clinical severity and poor prognosis compared to other subtypes, it is often misdiagnosed or mistaken as light chain type MM, as in the present case, because of the low level of IgD M-protein, resulting in delayed diagnosis. Physicians must take MM into consideration as a differential diagnosis when inactive RA patients present with inexplicable elevated calcium, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesion symptoms and should be aware of IgD MM to establish the correct diagnosis promptly.

High burden of drug therapy in adult congenital heart disease: polypharmacy as marker of morbidity and mortality

Aims

To assess medication use in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients compared to the age- and sex-matched general population, identify patterns of pharmacotherapy, and analyse associations between pharmacotherapy and adverse outcomes in ACHD.

Methods and results

Data of 14 138 ACHD patients from the CONCOR registry [35 (24–48) years, 49% male] and age- and sex-matched referents (1:10 ratio) were extracted from the Dutch Dispensed Drug Register for the years 2006–14. Adult congenital heart disease patients had more cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs than referents (median 3 vs. 1, P < 0.001). Polypharmacy, defined as ≥5 dispensed drug types yearly, was present in 30% of ACHD and 15% of referents {odds ratio [OR] = 2.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.39–2.54]}. Polypharmacy was independently associated with female sex [OR = 1.92 (95% CI 1.88–1.96)], older age [for men: OR = 2.3/10 years (95% CI 2.2–2.4) and for women: OR = 1.6/10 years (95% CI 1.5–1.6); P_interaction < 0.001], and ACHD severity [mild: OR = 2.51 (95% CI 2.40–2.61), moderate: OR = 3.22 (95% CI 3.06–3.40), severe: OR = 4.87 (95% CI 4.41–5.38)]. Cluster analysis identified three subgroups with distinct medication patterns; a low medication use group (8-year cumulative survival: 98%), and a cardiovascular and comorbidity group with lower survival (92% and 95%, respectively). Cox regression revealed a strong association between polypharmacy and mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.94 (95% CI 3.22–4.81)], corrected for age, sex, and defect severity. Polypharmacy also increased the risk of hospitalization for adverse drug events [HR = 4.58 (95% CI 2.04–10.29)].

Conclusion

Both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular medication use is high in ACHD with twice as much polypharmacy compared with the matched general population. Patients with polypharmacy had a four-fold increased risk of mortality and adverse drug events. Recognition of distinct medication patterns can help identify patients at highest risk. Drug regimens need repeating evaluation to assess the appropriateness of all prescriptions. More high-quality studies are needed to improve ACHD care with more evidence-based pharmacotherapy.

High Levels of Polypharmacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis-A Challenge Not Covered by Current Management Recommendations: Data From a Large Real-Life Study

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with high frequency of comorbidities and increased risk of polypharmacy. Although there is a great potential for complications, there is a gap in literature on polypharmacy in patients with rheumatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in a population in a real-life setting.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in Brazil. Patients underwent clinical evaluation and medical records analysis. Polypharmacy was considered as a dependent variable. To test independent variables, we used Poisson regression.

RESULTS

We evaluated 792 patients (89% female, median age 56.6 years). Median duration of disease was 12.7 years, 78.73% had a positive rheumatoid factor. The median of disease activity score-28 was 3.5 (disease with mild activity), median of the clinical disease activity index score was 9, and median of health assessment questionnaire-disability index was 0.875; 47% used corticosteroids, 9.1% used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 90.9% used synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, 35.7% used biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). In total, 537 (67.9%) patients used 5 or more drugs. Polypharmacy showed a relationship with a number of comorbidities and use of specific drugs (corticosteroids, methotrexate, and biological DMARDs).

CONCLUSION

We found a high prevalence of polypharmacy (67.9%) in RA. Solutions to management this problem should be stimulated.

Biologic prescribing decisions following serious infection: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objectives

To establish whether the decision to stop, continue or switch TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy to a biologic drug with an alternative mode of action following a serious infection (SI) impacts upon the risk of recurrent SI in patients with RA.

Methods

Patients recruited to the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register-RA with at least one episode of SI while on TNFi were included. The biologic treatment decision following SI was considered. A multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of recurrent SI and whether biologic treatment choices influenced future SI risk.

Results

In total, 1583 patients suffered at least one SI while on TNFi. Most patients (73%) were recorded as continuing TNFi 60 days after an index SI. The rate of recurrent SI was 25.6% per annum (95% CI: 22.5, 29.2%). The rate of recurrent SI was highest in patients who stopped their TNFi (42.6% per annum, 95% CI: 32.5, 55.7%) and lowest in those who switched biologic drug class (12.1% per annum, 95% CI: 3.9, 37.4%). Compared with patients stopping biologic therapy, patients who continued or switched drug class had significantly lower risk of recurrent SI (drug continuation hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.74; drug switch hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.95).

Conclusions

Patients who continued or switched their TNFi post-index SI had a lower risk of recurrent SI infection compared with those who stopped the drug. This may be explained by better control of disease activity with reintroduction of biologic therapy, a driving factor for SI or alternatively channelling fitter patients to restart biologic therapy.

Polypharmacy is associated with treatment response and serious adverse events: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective

To evaluate whether polypharmacy is associated with treatment response and serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with RA using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-RA).

Methods

The BSRBR-RA is a prospective observational cohort study of biologic therapy starters and a DMARD comparator arm. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds of a EULAR ‘good response’ after 12 months of biologic therapy by medication count. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk of SAEs. The utility of the models were compared with the Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index using Receiver Operator Characteristic and Harrell’s C statistic.

Results

The analysis included 22 005 patients, of which 83% were initiated on biologics. Each additional medication reduced the odds of a EULAR good response by 8% [odds ratios 0.92 (95% CI 0.91, 0.93) P < 0.001] and 3% in the adjusted model [adjusted odds ratios 0.97 (95% CI 0.95, 0.98) P < 0.001]. The Receiver Operator Characteristic demonstrated significantly greater areas under the curve with the polypharmacy model than the Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index. There were 12 547 SAEs reported in 7286 patients. Each additional medication equated to a 13% increased risk of an SAE [hazard ratio 1.13 (95% CI 1.12, 1.13) P < 0.001] and 6% in the adjusted model [adjusted hazard ratio 1.06 (95% CI 1.05, 1.07) P < 0.001]. Predictive values for SAEs were comparable between the polypharmacy and Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index model.

Conclusion

Polypharmacy is a simple but valuable predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with RA. This study supports medication count as a valid measure for use in epidemiologic analyses.

Drug-related problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at risk of acquiring drug-related problems (DRPs). However, there has been a lack of studies on DRPs in patients with RA up to now.

METHOD

This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from January 2012 to December 2017 with the purpose of assessing DRPs in RA patients and factors associated with its occurrence. A total of 200 patients who had received pharmacological treatment for RA were enrolled in this study. Assessment of DRPs was based on the Pharmaceutical Network Care Europe tool version 5.01.

RESULTS

A total of 289 DRPs with an average of 1.5±1.0 problems per patient were identified, in which 78.5% of the population had at least one DRP. The most common DRPs encountered were adverse reactions (38.8%), drug interactions (33.6%), and drug-choice problems (14.5%). Factors that had significant association with the occurrence of DRPs were polypharmacy (P=0.003), multiple comorbidities (P=0.001), hyperlipidemia (P=0.009), osteo (P=0.040), and renal impairment (P=0.044). These data indicated that the prevalence of DRPs was high among RA patients.

CONCLUSION

Early identification of types of DRPs and associated factors may enhance the prevention and management of RA.

The Association between Absence of Abdominal Pain and Mortality in Lower Intestinal Perforation in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

Objective

To determine mortality and predictive factors for lower intestinal perforation (LIP) among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center, observational study analyzed mortality rates in 31 autoimmune rheumatic disease patients with LIP who were admitted to our hospital from January 2002 to June 2017. The primary outcome was the mortality rate during hospitalization.

Results

The median age at the time of LIP was 61 years, and the survival rate at discharge was 64.5%. Eleven patients died of sepsis during hospitalization. Cox univariable analysis for mortality during hospitalization showed that absence of abdominal pain (hazard ratio (HR) 5.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–22.9), higher age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.11), chronic kidney disease (HR 6.89, 95% CI 1.85–25.7), systemic vasculitis (HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.14–13.6), higher blood urea nitrogen (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.04), higher serum creatinine (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06–1.87), and LIP due to malignancy (HR 14.3, 95% CI 1.95–105.1) significantly increased mortality.

Conclusion

Abdominal pain was absent in 16% of LIP patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and this absence was a poor prognostic factor in this cohort. Moreover, higher age, chronic kidney disease, systemic vasculitis, and LIP due to malignancy were associated with significantly increased mortality. Physicians should be aware of LIP in autoimmune disease patients with higher age, chronic kidney diseases, or systemic vasculitis even if patients reveal mild abdominal symptoms.

Cardiac eccentric remodeling in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

It is known that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher risk of coronary heart disease and sudden cardiac death. Abnormalities in cardiac geometry appear to be involved in the setting of the cardiovascular risk, but it has never been specifically investigated in RA. We enrolled 44 patients with RA compared to 131 subjects without RA (normal, N): The RA aged between 18 and 70 years (mean 48.3 ± 2.1), 25 females, BMI 27.6 ± 0.9; N, of equal age (48.6 ± 1.2, n.s.), included 80 females (BMI 26.7 ± 0.2, ns). Cardiac Ultrasounds showed an increase of the diameter of the left ventricle but not in the septum with reduction of relative wall thickness (RWT) in the RA population compared to N. Relative wall thickness inversely correlates with biochemical parameters of inflammatory response (gamma globulin, p < 0.03; F = 5,660) and anti citrullinated peptides antibody (anti-CCP Ab) (p < 0.02; F = 7,1620) We conclude that unfavorable cardiac remodeling can increase cardiovascular risk in patients with RA.