Effect of fenofibrate in combination with urate lowering agents in patients with gout

The Pleiotropic Effects of Lipid-Modifying Interventions: Exploring Traditional and Emerging Hypolipidemic Therapies

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease poses a significant global health issue, with dyslipidemia standing out as a major risk factor. In recent decades, lipid-lowering therapies have evolved significantly, with statins emerging as the cornerstone treatment. These interventions play a crucial role in both primary and secondary prevention by effectively reducing cardiovascular risk through lipid profile enhancements. Beyond their primary lipid-lowering effects, extensive research indicates that these therapies exhibit pleiotropic actions, offering additional health benefits. These include anti-inflammatory properties, improvements in vascular health and glucose metabolism, and potential implications in cancer management. While statins and ezetimibe have been extensively studied, newer lipid-lowering agents also demonstrate similar pleiotropic effects, even in the absence of direct cardiovascular benefits. This narrative review explores the diverse pleiotropic properties of lipid-modifying therapies, emphasizing their non-lipid effects that contribute to reducing cardiovascular burden and exploring emerging benefits for non-cardiovascular conditions. Mechanistic insights into these actions are discussed alongside their potential therapeutic implications.

Effects of fenofibrate therapy on renal function in primary gout patients

Objective

To investigate the incidence and potential risk factors for development of fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity in gout patients.

Methods

A total of 983 gout patients on fenofibrate treatment who visited the dedicated Gout Clinic at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between September 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively enrolled from the electronic records system. Fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥0.3 mg/dl within 6 months of fenofibrate initiation. The change trend of SCr and uric acid levels during the treatment period were assessed by a generalised additive mixed model (GAMM). Multivariate analysis was performed for risk factors affecting elevated SCr.

Results

A total of 100 (10.2%) patients experienced an increase in SCr ≥0.3 mg/dl within 6 months after fenofibrate initiation. The median change of SCr in the whole cohort was 0.11 mg/dl [interquartile range (IQR) 0.03–0.20], whereas it was 0.36 (0.33–0.45) in the fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity group. In a multivariable regression model, chronic kidney disease (CKD) [odds ratio (OR) 2.39 (95% CI 1.48, 3.86)] and tophus [OR 2.29 (95% CI 1.39, 3.78)] were identified to be risk predictors, independent of measured covariates, of fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity. During the treatment period, although SCr temporarily increased, serum urate and triglyceride concentrations decreased using the interaction analysis of GAMM. Of those with fenofibrate withdrawal records, the SCr increase in 65% of patients was reversed after an average of 49 days off the drug.

Conclusions

This observational study implied that fenofibrate-associated nephrotoxicity occurs frequently in gout patients, especially in patients with tophi or CKD. The potential renal risks of fenofibrate usage in gout needs additional research.

Impact of fenofibrate therapy on serum uric acid concentrations: a review and meta-analysis

Fenofibrate is a marketed fibric acid derivative for lipid-lowering in patients with lipid disorders. Numerous studies have proven fenofibrate had a certain effect on serum uric acid, here we conducted this study to quantitatively assess the effect of fenofibrate intervention in modulating serum uric acid concentration and the influence on serum creatinine. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials update to January, 2020. Primary endpoints focused on serum uric acid concentration and serum creatinine concentration. The pooled effects were calculated as weighted mean difference (WMD) by a random-effects model. Finally, 9 studies representing 487 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that fenofibrate significantly reduced serum uric acid levels (WMD -1.32 mg/dL, 95%CI -1.61 to -1.03, p < 0.001) and an elevated level in serum creatinine (WMD 0.09 mg/dL, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.15, p < 0.001) following fenofibrate therapy compared with placebo. The present study provided strong evidence that fenofibrate intervention exerted a significant reduction on serum uric acid and a mild increase on serum creatinine. Meta-analysis suggested that there were no significant association between the serum uric acid lowering effect with either dose or treatment duration. Overall, our meta-analysis ascertained that fenofibrate have potential therapeutic effects in patients with lipid metabolic abnormalities but with mid nephrotoxicity. There is strong evidence to provide future direction of practical application and clinical researches of fenofibrate.

Evaluation of the causal effects of blood lipid levels on gout with summary level GWAS data: two-sample Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis

Observational studies have identified gout patients are often comorbid with dyslipidemia. However, the relationship between dyslipidemia and gout is still unclear. We first performed Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the causal effect of four lipid traits on gout and serum urate based on publicly available GWAS summary statistics (n ~100,000 for lipid, 69,374 for gout and 110,347 for serum urate). MR showed each standard deviation (SD) (~12.26 mg/dL) increase in HDL resulted in about 25% (95% CI 9.0%-38%, p = 3.31E-3) reduction of gout risk, with 0.09 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.12 to -0.05, p = 7.00E-04) decrease in serum urate, and each SD (~112.33 mg/dL) increase of TG was associated with 0.10 mg/dL (95% CI: 0.06-0.14, p = 9.87E-05) increase in serum urate. Those results were robust against various sensitive analyses. Additionally, independent effects of HDL and TG on gout/serum urate were confirmed with multivariable MR. Finally, mediation analysis demonstrated HDL or TG could also indirectly affect gout via the pathway of serum urate. In conclusion, our study confirmed the causal associations between HDL (and TG) and gout, and further revealed the effect of HDL or TG on gout could also be mediated via serum urate.

Fenofibrate decreased microalbuminuria in the type 2 diabetes patients with hypertriglyceridemia

Background

This study was to research the efficacy of fenofibrate in the treatment of microalbuminuria in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertriglyceridemia.

Methods

Type 2 diabetic patients (56) with microalbuminuria and hypertriglyceridemia aged 30 to 75 were randomly divided into the fenofibrate treatment group(n = 28) and the control group (n = 28) for 180 days. Urinary microalbumin /creatinine ratio (UACR) and other metabolic parameters were compared at baseline, during treatment and after treatment.

Results

After 180 days, the reduction of level of fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between two groups showed no difference. In the treatment group, uric acid (UA) (296.42 ± 56.41 vs 372.46 ± 72.78), triglyceride (TG) [1.51(1.17, 2.06) vs 3.04(2.21, 3.29)], and UACR [36.45 (15.78,102.41) vs 129.00 (53.00, 226.25)] were significantly decreased compared with the baseline. The high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were significantly increased (1.22 ± 0.26 vs 1.09 ± 0.24) compared with the baseline. The decrease in UACR [− 44.05(− 179.47, − 12.16) vs − 8.15(− 59.69, 41.94)]in treatment group was significantly higher compared with the control group. The decrease in UACR was positively associated with the decreases in TG (r = 0.447, P = 0.042) and UA (r = 0.478, P = 0.024) after fenofibrate treatment.

Conclusion

In the patients with hypertriglyceridemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus, fenofibrate can improve microalbuminuria and do not increase the deterioration of glomerular filtration rate.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02314533, 2014.12.9

Effect of fenofibrate on uric acid level in patients with gout

Gout is a chronic disease associated with deposition of monosodium urate crystals and accompanied by diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Hypertriglyceridemia is common among patients with gout, and fenofibrate is usually used to reduce triglyceride levels. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of uric acid reduction by fenofibrate in patients with gout administered uric acid lowering agents (viz., the xanthine oxidase inhibitors allopurinol and febuxostat). Data from 863 patients with gout were collected from electronic medical records comprising information on underlying diseases, laboratory findings, and drug histories. Among all the patients, 70 (8.11%) took fenofibrate with allopurinol or febuxostat. Male and young patients took fenofibrate more frequently, and hypertension was less frequent in patients administered xanthine oxidase inhibitors and fenofibrate than in those administered only xanthine oxidase inhibitors. After the treatment, serum uric acid levels more significantly decreased (−1.81 ± 2.41 vs. −2.40 ± 2.28 mg/dL, p = 0.043) in patients with fenofibrate cotreatment, than in those administered allopurinol or febuxostat alone. The effect of uric acid reduction was larger (b = −1.098, p < 0.001) in patients taking glucocorticoids than in those administered other treatments. There was no difference in the levels of creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and aminotransferases between patients treated with and without fenofibrate. Fenofibrate additionally reduced uric acid levels without showing any change in the results of renal or liver function tests, suggesting that the addition of fenofibrate is a reasonable option for treating gout in patients having high triglyceride levels.

Effect of fenofibrate on uric acid and gout in type 2 diabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, controlled FIELD study

BACKGROUND

Gout is a painful disorder and is common in type 2 diabetes. Fenofibrate lowers uric acid and reduces gout attacks in small, short-term studies. Whether fenofibrate produces sustained reductions in uric acid and gout attacks is unknown.

METHODS

In the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial, participants aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive either co-micronised fenofibrate 200 mg once per day or matching placebo for a median of 5 years follow-up. We did a post-hoc analysis of recorded on-study gout attacks and plasma uric acid concentrations according to treatment allocation. The outcomes of this analysis were change in uric acid concentrations and risk of on-study gout attacks. The FIELD study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN64783481.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 23, 1998, and Nov 3, 2000, 9795 patients were randomly assigned to fenofibrate (n=4895) or placebo (n=4900) in the FIELD study. Uric acid concentrations fell by 20·2% (95% CI 19·9-20·5) during the 6-week active fenofibrate run-in period immediately pre-randomisation (a reduction of 0·06 mmol/L or 1 mg/dL) and remained -20·1% (18·5-21·7, p<0·0001) lower in patients taking fenofibrate than in those on placebo in a random subset re-measured at 1 year. With placebo allocation, there were 151 (3%) first gout events over 5 years, compared with 81 (2%) among those allocated fenofibrate (HR with treatment 0·54, 95% CI 0·41-0·70; p<0·0001). In the placebo group, the cumulative proportion of patients with first gout events was 7·7% in patients with baseline uric acid concentration higher than 0·36 mmol/L and 13·9% in those with baseline uric acid concentration higher than 0·42 mmol/L, compared with 3·4% and 5·7%, respectively, in the fenofibrate group. Risk reductions were similar among men and women and those with dyslipidaemia, on diuretics, and with elevated uric acid concentrations. For participants with elevated baseline uric acid concentrations despite taking allopurinol at study entry, there was no heterogeneity of the treatment effect of fenofibrate on gout risk. Taking account of all gout events, fenofibrate treatment halved the risk (HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·37-0·60; p<0·0001) compared with placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Fenofibrate lowered uric acid concentrations by 20%, and almost halved first on-study gout events over 5 years of treatment. Fenofibrate could be a useful adjunct for preventing gout in diabetes.

FUNDING

None.

Fenofibrate decreases the bone quality by down regulating Runx2 in high-fat-diet induced Type 2 diabetes mellitus mouse model

Background

This study is to investigate the effect of fenofibrate on the bone quality of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) mouse model.

Methods

T2DM mouse model was induced by high-fat-diet, and the mice were treated with fenofibrate (100 mg/kg) (DIO-FENO) or PBS (DIO-PBS) for 4 weeks. The bone microstructure and biomechanical properties of femora were analyzed by micro-CT and 3-Point bending test. The protein expression was detected by immunohistochemical staining and Western blot. The cell apoptosis was evaluated by TUNEL staining. The Bcl2, caspase 3, and osteoblast marker genes were detected by RT-qPCR.

Results

The biomechanical properties of bones from DIO-FENO group were significantly lower than those in the control and DIO-PBS groups. Besides, the trabecular number was lower than those of the other groups, though the cortical porosity was decreased compared with that of DIO-PBS group because of the increase of apoptotic cells. The expression of osteocalcin and collagen I were decreased after treatment with fenofibrate in T2DM mice. Moreover, the cell viability was decreased after treated with different concentrations of fenofibrate, and the expression of Runx2 decreased after treated with high dose of fenofibrate.

Conclusion

Fenofibrate decreases the bone quality of T2DM mice through decreasing the expression of collagen I and osteocalcin, which may be resulted from the down regulation of Runx2 expression.

The relationship of apolipoprotein B and very low density lipoprotein triglyceride with hyperuricemia and gout

INTRODUCTION

Gout results from an innate immune response to monosodium urate (MSU) crystals deposited in joints. Increased very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) has been associated with gout. The apolipoprotein B (apo B), which is present on VLDL, regulates neutrophil response to MSU crystals and has been positively associated with gout. Furthermore, the gene (A1CF) encoding the complementation factor for the APOB mRNA-editing enzyme is associated with urate levels. However, the relationship of apo B and VLDL with gout and hyperuricaemia (HU) is still unclear. Therefore, we tested the association of VLDL and apo B with HU and with gout compared to HU.

METHODS

New Zealand European (n = 90) and Māori and Pacific Island (Polynesian) (n = 90) male gout case and control sample sets were divided into normouricaemia (NU), asymptomatic HU and gout groups. Size exclusion chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay was used to measure VLDL and apo B. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the risk of gout and HU per unit change in VLDL and apo B.

RESULTS

Increased levels of VLDL triglycerides (Tg) were observed in the gout sample set compared to NU and HU in Europeans (P = 1.8 × 10(-6) and 1 × 10(-3), respectively), but only compared to NU in Polynesians (P = 0.023). This increase was driven by increased number of VLDL particles in the European participants and by the Tg-enrichment of existing VLDL particles in the Polynesian participants. Each mmol/L increase in VLDL Tg was significantly associated with gout in the presence of HU in Europeans, with a similar trend in Polynesians (OR = 7.61, P = 0.011 and 2.84, P = 0.069, respectively). Each μmol/L increase in total apo B trended towards decreased risk of HU (OR = 0.47; P = 0.062) and, conversely, with increased risk of gout compared to HU (OR = 5.60; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased VLDL Tg is associated with the risk of gout compared to HU. A genetic approach should be taken to investigate the possibility for causality of VLDL in gout. Apolipoprotein B may have pleiotropic effects in determining HU and gout.

Fenofibrate and dipyridamole treatments in low-doses either alone or in combination blunted the development of nephropathy in diabetic rats

Low-doses of fenofibrate and dipyridamole have pleiotropic renoprotective actions in diabetic rats. This study investigated their combined effect relative to their individual treatments and lisinopril in rats with diabetic nephropathy. Streptozotocin (55mg/kg, i.p., once)-administered diabetic rats were allowed for 10 weeks to develop nephropathy. Diabetic rats after 10 weeks developed nephropathy with discernible renal structural and functional changes as assessed in terms of increase in kidney weight to body weight ratio (KW/BW), and elevations of serum creatinine, urea and uric acid, which accompanied with elevated serum triglycerides and decreased high-density lipoproteins. Hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acid Schiff and Masson trichrome staining confirmed renal pathological changes in diabetic rats that included glomerular capsular wall distortion, mesangial cell expansion, glomerular microvascular condensation, tubular damage and degeneration and fibrosis. Low-dose fenofibrate (30mg/kg, p.o., 4 weeks) and low-dose dipyridamole (20mg/kg, p.o., 4 weeks) treatment either alone or in combination considerably reduced renal structural and functional abnormalities in diabetic rats, but without affecting the elevated glucose level. Fenofibrate, but not dipyridamole, significantly prevented the lipid alteration and importantly the uric acid elevation in diabetic rats. Lisinopril (5mg/kg, p.o., 4 weeks, reference compound), prevented the hyperglycemia, lipid alteration and development of diabetic nephropathy. Lipid alteration and uric acid elevation, besides hyperglycemia, could play key roles in the development of nephropathy. Low-doses of fenofibrate and dipyridamole treatment either alone or in combination markedly prevented the diabetes-induced nephropathy. Their combination was as effective as to their individual treatment, but not superior in preventing the development of diabetic nephropathy.

[Treatment of gout]

In France, colchicine remains the standard treatment for the acute flare of gout. The lowest dose currently used decreases digestive toxicity. Doses of colchicine should be adapted to renal function and age, and possible drug interactions should be considered. Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are an alternative to colchicine, but their use is frequently limited by comorbidity. When these treatments are contraindicated, corticosteroid injections can be performed after excluding septic arthritis. Systemic corticosteroids could be used in severe polyarticular flares. Anti-IL1 should provide a therapeutic alternative for severe cortico dependant gout with tophus. To prevent acute flares and reduce tophus volume, uric acid serum level should be reduced and maintained below 60mg/L (360μmol/L). To achieve this objective, it is often necessary to increase the daily dose of allopurinol above 300mgs, but the need to adapt the dose to renal function is a frequent cause of therapeutic failure. In the absence of renal stone or renal colic and hyperuraturia, uricosuric drugs are the second-line treatment. Probenecid is effective when creatinine clearance is superior to 50mL/min Benzbromarone, which was withdrawn due to hepatotoxicity, can be obtained on an individualized patient basis in the case of failure of allopurinol and probenecid. Febuxostat, which was recently approved, is a therapeutic alternative. Diuretics should be discontinued if possible. Use of fenofibrate should be discussed in the presence of dyslipidemia and losartan in patient with high blood pressure. Uricolytic drugs (pegloticase), which are currently being investigated, may be useful for the treatment of serious gout with tophus, especially in the presence of renal failure. Education of patient, identification and correction of cardiovascular risk factors should not be forgotten.

Update on gout and hyperuricemia

There have been recent advances in the understanding of underlying mechanisms and treatment of gout and chronic hyperuricemia, making this an important time to review the current state of the disease. The goal of this article is to provide a practical review of the current standard of care as well as discuss some new developments in the management. There is an increasing prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia worldwide. Gout confers a significant individual and societal burden and is often under-treated. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of acute gout should be followed by aggressive and goal-oriented treatment of hyperuricemia and other risk factors. Allopurinol remains as a first-line treatment for chronic hyperuricemia, but uricosuric agents may also be considered in some patients. Febuxostat, a non-purine xanthine-oxidase inhibitor, is a new agent approved for the treatment of hyperuricemia in patients with gout, which may be used when allopurinol is contraindicated. Gout and hyperuricemia appear to be independent risk factors for incident hypertension, renal disease and cardiovascular disease. Physicians should consider cardiovascular risk factors in patients with gout and treat them appropriately and aggressively.

Differential changes in serum uric acid concentrations in sibutramine promoted weight loss in diabetes: results from four weeks of the lead-in period of the SCOUT trial

Background and aims

Elevated levels of serum uric acid are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The response of uric acid to weight loss therapy (lifestyle plus sibutramine) in an overweight and obese cardiovascular high risk population was studied.

Methods and results

Data from a four week single-blind lead-in period of the Sibutramine Cardiovascular OUTcomes (SCOUT) study were analyzed. 2584 patients (24%) had diabetes mellitus (DM) only, 1748 (16%) had cardiovascular disease (CVD) only and 6397 (60%) had both DM + CVD. Uric acid concentrations (mean ± standard deviation) at screening were significantly higher among patients with CVD compared to patients without CVD (p < 0.0001): 369 ± 86 μmol/L, 374 ± 98 μmol/L and 342 ± 87 μmol/L in CVD only, CVD+DM and DM only groups, respectively. During treatment uric acid decreased significantly more in patients without DM (p < 0.0001): -15.0 μmol/L (95% confidence interval -17.7;-12.4), -4.6 μmol/L (-6.2;-3.0), and -6.6 μmol/L (-8.7;-4.5) in CVD only, CVD+DM, and DM only groups, respectively. In patients who failed to lose weight, sibutramine induced lower uric acid levels, but greater weight loss and diabetes were associated with smaller falls in blood uric acid levels; decreasing fasting and urinary glucose concentrations in diabetes were associated with increases in uric acid levels.

Conclusion

A four week daily intake of sibutramine and life style changes was associated with significant reductions in mean uric acid levels. Changes in renal glucose load in diabetes seem to counteract a potential uricosuric effect of sibutramine.

Trial Registration

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov number: NCT00234832.

The modern management of gout

Gout is an inflammatory arthritis characterized by self-limiting but excruciatingly painful acute attacks. These are a consequence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals being deposited within articular or periarticular tissue. Chronic tophaceous gout can develop after years of acute intermittent gout. Recent discoveries, including the role of the inflammasome and intracellular events demonstrating that pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1 beta, -8 and TNF-alpha, promote neutrophil influx. Also, genetic advances with the identification of the URAT-1 transporter and genetic variation in SLC 2A9 as a key regulator of urate homoeostasis, have given us deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of gout, and also allow for more targeted treatments. Hopefully, new and emerging therapeutic options will reduce treatment-resistant gout in patients who are unresponsive or unable to take traditional urate lowering therapy. The development of new therapies may also increase patient numbers being treated in the specialist setting, which may have several secondary benefits.

Gout. Novel therapies for treatment of gout and hyperuricemia

In the past few decades, gout has increased not only in prevalence, but also in clinical complexity, the latter accentuated in part by a dearth of novel advances in treatments for hyperuricemia and gouty arthritis. Fortunately, recent research reviewed here, much of it founded on elegant translational studies of the past decade, highlights how gout can be better managed with cost-effective, well-established therapies. In addition, the advent of both new urate-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs, also reviewed here, promises for improved management of refractory gout, including in subjects with co-morbidities such as chronic kidney disease. Effectively delivering improved management of hyperuricemia and gout will require a frame shift in practice patterns, including increased recognition of the implications of refractory disease and frequent noncompliance of patients with gout, and understanding the evidence basis for therapeutic targets in serum urate-lowering and gouty inflammation.

Gout and Hyperuricemia: New Guidelines and Treatments

Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in western countries and the incidence is increasing. Additionally, evidence now exists that cases of severe, refractory gout seem to be increasing. The management of gout and hyperuricemia has remained largely unchanged for decades and includes antiinflammatories used initially for acute attacks and primarily allopurinol to prevent future attacks. Evidence-based guidance for the management of gout and hyperuricemia has been plagued by a lack of randomized, controlled studies and the lack of new medications. Recently evidence-based guidelines by the European League Against Rheumatism were published; one of the first attempts by a major medical body to assess the state of gout and hyperuricemia treatment. Additionally, several new compounds seem poised to be released for hyperuricemia treatment. This review details the important aspects of the gout guidelines relating to pharmacotherapy and critically examines the data surrounding new modalities to decrease serum uric acid.