1
|
Tang A, Calcaterra M, Harris M, Gardner PA, Zenonos GA, Stefko ST, Geltzeiler M, Zandberg DP, Snyderman CH, Wang EW, Choby G. The role of induction chemotherapy for orbital invasion in sinonasal malignancies: A systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:1226-1239. [PMID: 38829173 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) frequently present with orbital invasion. Orbital exenteration (OE) can lead to significant morbidity. Induction chemotherapy (IC) is a promising treatment alternative that may allow for orbit preserving (OP) treatments without compromising patient survival. This systematic review was conducted to synthesize the published data on SNM patients with orbital invasion who underwent IC, including tumor response, orbital outcomes, and survival. METHODS The study protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Databases Embase, Cochrane, Medline, and Scopus, from inception to July 17, 2023, were searched. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included, encompassing 305 SNM patients with orbital invasion treated with IC. Fourteen studies reported an overall IC response rate (positive response defined as complete or partial tumor volume reduction) of 77.2%. Among included studies, OE rates after IC ranged from 0 to 40%. Three studies reported a high rate of posttreatment functional orbital preservation (89.8-96.0%). Five studies specifically reported that 62.5% (60 out of 96) of patients were downgraded from planned OE to OP treatment following IC. Three studies reported a significant overall survival (OS) improvement in IC responders versus IC nonresponders. Following IC, 5-year OS ranged from 44.2 to 55.5%. Patients with olfactory neuroblastoma demonstrated the highest IC response rate and lowest OE rate (100 and 0%, respectively) versus those with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (68.4 and 0%) or squamous cell carcinomas (76.7 and 16%). CONCLUSIONS For select patients, IC may allow for OP in locally advanced SNMs with orbital involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Tang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Calcaterra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Micah Harris
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Georgios A Zenonos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - S Tonya Stefko
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Dan P Zandberg
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Zhong NN, Cao LM, Liu B, Bu LL. Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review. Int J Surg 2024; 110:3680-3700. [PMID: 38935830 PMCID: PMC11175762 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology
| | - Nian-Nian Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology
| | - Lei-Ming Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology
| | - Bing Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial – Head Neck Oncology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lin-Lin Bu
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial – Head Neck Oncology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang T, Li Y, Wang L, Wang J, Zhao K, Song X. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:775-784. [PMID: 37707615 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08223-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of induction chemotherapy (IC) in the treatment of locoregionally advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). METHODS 130 patients who accepted IC between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. After IC, all the patients underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT)/ radiotherapy (RT) or CRT/RT followed by surgery. We investigated the objective response to IC, the optimal treatment strategy, organ preservation, and long-term survival. RESULTS Eighty-seven patients (66.9%) achieved a partial response after IC. 86% (27/43) of the patients who did not respond to the IC still presented a sensitive response to radiotherapy (χ2 = 9.26, p = 0.005). Patients who respond to IC could benefit from CRT/RT followed by surgery over other treatment modalities. The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates of 61.2%, 51.3%, 52.1%, 58.1% for the IC response group were significantly superior to those of 37.3% (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-1.01, p = 0.030), 33.5% (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.002), 35.9% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.91, p = 0.009), 36.1% (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.35-1.03, p = 0.040) for the IC non-response group. Patients who responded to IC had a high rate of organ preservation compared with patients who did not respond to IC (90.8% vs. 74.4%, χ2 = 6.19, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrated a response rate to IC in patients with advanced SNSCC; furthermore, the response to IC indicated better survival. Patients who responded to IC had a high rate of organ preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Yi Li
- Department of Oncology, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, 212 Daguan Road, Kunming, 650032, China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Keqing Zhao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China.
| | - Xinmao Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tam K, Dunn LA, Cohen MA. Oncology for the rhinologist. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 32:14-19. [PMID: 38116847 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding the use of induction chemotherapy for a variety of histopathologies of sinonasal malignancy (SNMs) and to review the potential adverse effects of cytotoxic agents. RECENT FINDINGS Historically, patients with locally advanced SNMs have had relatively poor prognoses and high morbidity from treatment. The available retrospective data suggests that induction chemotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), neuroendocrine carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SSCC), and esthesioneuroblastoma. For SNUC and SSCC, response or nonresponse to induction chemotherapy may prognosticate outcomes and for SNUC specifically, drive selection of definitive therapy. In chemosensitive pathologies, induction chemotherapy appears to improve organ preservation. SUMMARY Induction chemotherapy may improve functional and oncologic outcomes for patients with SNMs. Because of the rarity of these pathologies, the available data is primarily retrospective. Future randomized, prospective studies should be performed to further optimize and elucidate the role of induction chemotherapy for SNMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lara A Dunn
- Head and Neck Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Melder KL, Geltzeiler M. Induction Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3798. [PMID: 37568614 PMCID: PMC10417481 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) are two of the most common, high-grade malignancies of the sinonasal cavity. The standard of care for resectable lesions per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines includes surgical resection with negative margins plus adjuvant radiation therapy. However, surgery for locally advanced disease with both orbital and intracranial involvement is associated with significant morbidity and poor overall survival. Over the last decade, induction chemotherapy (IC) has emerged as part of a multimodal treatment strategy to optimize locoregional disease control and minimize substantial surgical morbidity such as orbital exenteration without compromising rates of overall survival. The response to IC both guides additional therapy and helps prognosticate a patient's disease. This narrative review examines the data surrounding the management of patients with SNSCC and SNUC. The pros and cons of upfront surgical management plus adjuvant therapy will be explored, and the case for IC will be presented. The IC-specific regimens and treatment paradigms for SNSCC and SNUC will each be explored in detail. Organ preservation, treatment morbidity, and survival data will be presented, and evidence-based recommendations will be presented for the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saito T, Nakayama M, Ohnishi K, Tanaka S, Nakamura M, Murakami M, Matsumoto S, Baba K, Fujii K, Mizumoto M, Tabuchi K, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy in multimodal treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:106. [PMID: 37386495 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02296-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate proton beam therapy (PBT) in multimodal treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus (NPSCC). METHODS The cases in this study included T3 and T4 NPSCC without distant metastases that were treated at our center using PBT between July 2003 and December 2020. These cases were classified into 3 groups based on resectability and treatment strategy: surgery followed by postoperative PBT (group A); those indicated to be resectable, but the patient refused surgery and received radical PBT (group B); and those declared unresectable based on the extent of the tumor and treated with radical PBT (group C). RESULTS The study included 37 cases, with 10, 9 and 18 in groups A, B and C, respectively. The median follow-up period in surviving patients was 4.4 years (range 1.0-12.3 years). The 4-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates were 58%, 43% and 58% for all patients; 90%, 70% and 80% in group A, 89%, 78% and 89% in group B; and 24%, 11% and 24% in group C. There were significant differences in OS (p = 0.0028) and PFS (p = 0.009) between groups A and C; and in OS (p = 0.0027), PFS (p = 0.0045) and LC (p = 0.0075) between groups B and C. CONCLUSIONS PBT gave favorable outcomes in multimodal treatment for resectable locally advanced NPSCC, including surgery followed by postoperative PBT and radical PBT with concurrent chemotherapy. The prognosis for unresectable NPSCC was extremely poor, and reconsideration of treatment strategies, such as more active use of induction chemotherapy, may improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Nakayama
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kayoko Ohnishi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan
| | - Shuho Tanaka
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | | | - Motohiro Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shin Matsumoto
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Baba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Keitaro Fujii
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Keiji Tabuchi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamilton SN, Liu J, Holmes C, DeVries K, Olson R, Tran E, Berthelet E, Wu J, Chau N, Chan M, Thamboo A. Population-based Long-term Outcomes for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasal Cavity. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:199-205. [PMID: 36882926 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates population-based outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the nasal cavity treated in British Columbia. METHODS A retrospective review of nasal cavity SCC treated from 1984 to 2014 was performed (n = 159). Locoregional recurrence (LRR) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS The 3-year OS was 74.2% for radiation alone, 75.8% for surgery alone, and 78.4% for surgery and radiation ( P = 0.16). The 3-year LRR was 28.4% for radiation alone, 28.2% for surgery alone, and 22.6% for surgery and radiation ( P = 0.21). On multivariable analysis, surgery and postoperative radiation relative to surgery alone was associated with a lower risk of LRR (hazard ratio: 0.36, P = 0.03). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, node-positive, orbital invasion, smoking, and advanced age were associated with worse OS (all P <0.05). CONCLUSION In this population-based analysis, multimodality treatment with surgery and adjuvant radiation were associated with improved locoregional control for SCC of the nasal cavity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Connor Holmes
- Department of Otolaryngology
- University of British Columbia
| | | | - Robert Olson
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer-Centre for the North, Prince George, BC, Canada
| | - Eric Tran
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Radiation Oncology
| | | | - Jonn Wu
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Nicole Chau
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver
| | - Matthew Chan
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Radiation Oncology
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thawani R, Kim MS, Arastu A, Feng Z, West MT, Taflin NF, Thein KZ, Li R, Geltzeiler M, Lee N, Fuller CD, Grandis JR, Floudas CS, Heinrich MC, Hanna E, Chandra RA. The contemporary management of cancers of the sinonasal tract in adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:72-112. [PMID: 35916666 PMCID: PMC9840681 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal malignancies make up <5% of all head and neck neoplasms, with an incidence of 0.5-1.0 per 100,000. The outcome of these rare malignancies has been poor, whereas significant progress has been made in the management of other cancers. The objective of the current review was to describe the incidence, causes, presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and recent developments of malignancies of the sinonasal tract. The diagnoses covered in this review included sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, sinonasal adenocarcinoma, sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma, and esthesioneuroblastoma, which are exclusive to the sinonasal tract. In addition, the authors covered malignances that are likely to be encountered in the sinonasal tract-primary mucosal melanoma, NUT (nuclear protein of the testis) carcinoma, and extranodal natural killer cell/T-cell lymphoma. For the purpose of keeping this review as concise and focused as possible, sarcomas and malignancies that can be classified as salivary gland neoplasms were excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajat Thawani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Myung Sun Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Asad Arastu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Zizhen Feng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Malinda T. West
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | | | - Kyaw Zin Thein
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Ryan Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Jennifer R. Grandis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco
| | | | - Michael C. Heinrich
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Ravi A. Chandra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Murr AT, Lenze NR, Weiss JM, Grilley-Olson JE, Patel SA, Shen C, Chera BS, Zanation AM, Thorp BD, Sheth SH. Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survival Outcomes Following Induction Chemotherapy vs Standard of Care Therapy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 167:846-851. [PMID: 35259033 PMCID: PMC9630958 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221083097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective To compare oncologic outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC)
treated with standard of care (SOC) definitive therapy, consisting of
surgery or chemoradiotherapy, vs induction therapy followed by definitive
therapy. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Academic tertiary care hospital. Methods The medical records of patients with biopsy-proven SNSCC treated between 2000
and 2020 were reviewed for demographics, tumor characteristics, staging,
treatment details, and oncologic outcomes. Patients were matched 1-to-1 by
age, sex, and cancer stage according to treatment received. Time-to-event
analyses were conducted. Results The analysis included 26 patients with locally advanced SNSCC who received
either induction therapy (n = 13) or SOC (n = 13). Baseline demographics,
Charlson Comorbidity Index, and median follow-up time were well balanced.
Weekly cetuximab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel were the most common induction
regimen utilized. Tolerance and safety to induction were excellent.
Objective responses were observed in 11 of 13 patients receiving induction.
No difference in disease-free survival was found between the induction and
SOC groups at 1 or 3 years. However, when compared with SOC, induction
therapy resulted in significant improvement in overall survival at 2 years
(100% vs 65.3%, P = .043) and 3 years (100% vs 48.4%,
P = .016) following completion of definitive therapy.
Two patients in the SOC group developed metastatic disease, as compared with
none in the induction group. Conclusions Induction therapy was safe and effective. When compared with SOC, induction
therapy improved 3-year overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander T Murr
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicholas R Lenze
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jared M Weiss
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Juneko E Grilley-Olson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shetal A Patel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bhishamjit S Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Adam M Zanation
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Siddharth H Sheth
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Corino VDA, Bologna M, Calareso G, Resteghini C, Sdao S, Orlandi E, Licitra L, Mainardi L, Bossi P. Refining Tumor Treatment in Sinonasal Cancer Using Delta Radiomics of Multi-Parametric MRI after the First Cycle of Induction Chemotherapy. J Imaging 2022; 8:jimaging8020046. [PMID: 35200748 PMCID: PMC8877083 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging8020046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Response to induction chemotherapy (IC) has been predicted in patients with sinonasal cancer using early delta radiomics obtained from T1- and T2-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, comparing results with early radiological evaluation by RECIST. Methods: Fifty patients were included in the study. For each image (at baseline and after the first IC cycle), 536 radiomic features were extracted as follows: semi-supervised principal component analysis components, explaining 97% of the variance, were used together with a support vector machine (SVM) to develop a radiomic signature. One signature was developed for each sequence (T1-, T2-weighted and ADC). A multiagent decision-making algorithm was used to merge multiple signatures into one score. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for mono-modality signatures was 0.79 (CI: 0.65–0.88), 0.76 (CI: 0.62–0.87) and 0.93 (CI: 0.75–1) using T1-, T2-weighted and ADC images, respectively. The fuse signature improved the AUC when an ADC-based signature was added. Radiological prediction using RECIST criteria reached an accuracy of 0.78. Conclusions: These results suggest the importance of early delta radiomics and of ADC maps to predict the response to IC in sinonasal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina D. A. Corino
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (L.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-2399-3392
| | - Marco Bologna
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (L.M.)
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (S.S.)
| | - Carlo Resteghini
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (E.O.); (L.L.)
| | - Silvana Sdao
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (S.S.)
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (E.O.); (L.L.)
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.R.); (E.O.); (L.L.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mainardi
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (L.M.)
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Karp JM, Hu KS, Persky M, Persky M, Jacobson A, Tran T, Li Z, Givi B, Tam MM. Including Surgical Resection in the Multimodal Management of Very Locally Advanced Sinonasal Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 167:494-500. [PMID: 34962843 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211067503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sinonasal cancer often presents as locoregionally advanced disease. National guidelines recommend management of stage T4b tumors with systemic therapy and radiotherapy, but recent studies suggest that including surgical resection in the multimodal treatment of these tumors may improve local control and survival. We queried the National Cancer Database to examine patterns of care and outcomes in T4b sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). STUDY DESIGN Prospectively gathered data. SETTING National Cancer Database. METHODS Patients with T4b N0-3 M0 sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed in 2004 to 2016 were stratified between those who received chemoradiotherapy and those who underwent surgical resection with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. The overall survival of each cohort was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models, with repeat analysis after reweighting of data via inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS Among 805 patients included in analysis, 2-year overall survival for patients undergoing surgical resection was 60.8% (95% CI, 56.1%-65.9%), while for patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy it was 46.7% (95% CI, 41.9%-52.0%). On Cox regression analysis, the inclusion of surgery in management was associated with improved survival in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.723 [95% CI, 0.606-0.862]; P < .001) and multivariate analysis (HR, 0.739 [95% CI, 0.618-0.885]; P = .001). Results with reweighted data were consistent in univariate analysis (HR, 0.765 [95% CI, 0.636-0.920]; P = .004]). CONCLUSION Surgical treatment with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment for stage T4b sinonasal SCC was associated with promising survival outcomes, suggesting a role for incorporating surgery in treatment of select T4b SCC, particularly when removal of all macroscopic disease is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome M Karp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth S Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Persky
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark Persky
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam Jacobson
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Theresa Tran
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zujun Li
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Babak Givi
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Moses M Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Katagiri K, Shiga K, Saito D, Oikawa SI, Ikeda A, Tsuchida K, Miyaguchi J, Kusaka T, Sariishi T, Ariga H. Preliminary Study of Chemoradiotherapy Using Modified Docetaxel, Cis-diaminodichloroplatinum, and 5-Fluorouracil for Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. OTO Open 2021; 5:2473974X211045298. [PMID: 34568724 PMCID: PMC8458663 DOI: 10.1177/2473974x211045298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine the safety and efficacy of concomitant chemoradiotherapy using a modified TPF regimen (docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil) in patients with advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). Study Design Retrospective study. Setting Tertiary center (university hospital). Methods Seven patients with previously untreated T3-T4 SNSCC were enrolled. They underwent radiotherapy once daily (total dose, 70 Gy) with 2 courses of concomitant 120-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2/d), docetaxel (50 mg/m2, day 2), and cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 2) Results Grade 4 leukopenia, grade 4 neutropenia, and grade 3 lymphopenia were observed in 1, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. Grade 4 creatinine elevation was observed in 1 patient. However, other grade 3 or 4 adverse events were not common. Complete response was obtained in all patients. At 60 months there was 85.7% disease-free survival and 100% overall. Conclusion Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with a modified TPF regimen may be feasible and effective in patients with advanced SNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsunori Katagiri
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Kiyoto Shiga
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Daisuke Saito
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Oikawa
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Aya Ikeda
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Kodai Tsuchida
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Jun Miyaguchi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kusaka
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| | - Takumi Sariishi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe, Japan
| | - Hisanori Ariga
- Department of Radiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Yahaba-cho, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nguyen ES, Risbud A, Birkenbeuel JL, Murphy LS, Goshtasbi K, Pang JC, Abiri A, Lehrich BM, Haidar YM, Tjoa T, Kuan EC. Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of De Novo Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:434-443. [PMID: 34253092 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211021023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review overall survival (OS), recurrence patterns, and prognostic factors of de novo sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (DN-SCC). DATA SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, OVID Medline, and Cochrane databases from 2006 to December 23, 2020. REVIEW METHODS The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles were required to report either recurrence patterns or survival outcomes of adults with DN-SCC. Case reports, books, reviews, meta-analyses, and database studies were all excluded. RESULTS Forty-one studies reported on survival or recurrence outcomes. The aggregate 5-year OS was 54.5% (range, 18%-75%) from 35 studies (n = 1903). Patients undergoing open surgery were more likely to receive radiation therapy and present at an advanced stage compared to those receiving endoscopic surgery (all P < .001). Advanced T stage, presence of cervical nodal metastases, maxillary sinus primary site, and negative human papillomavirus (HPV) status were all correlated with significantly worse 5-year OS. Direct meta-analysis of 8 studies demonstrated patients with surgery were more likely to be alive at 5 years compared to those who did not receive surgery (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.48-3.47; P < .001). Recurrence was reported in 628 of 1471 patients from 26 studies (42.7%) with an aggregate 5-year locoregional control rate of 67.1% (range, 50.4%-93.3%). CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the 5-year OS rate for DN-SCC may approach 54.5% and recurrence rate approaches 42.7%. In addition, various tumor characteristics including advanced T stage, positive nodal status, maxillary sinus origin, and negative HPV status are all associated with decreased survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Adwight Risbud
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Jack L Birkenbeuel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Linda S Murphy
- Science Library Reference Department, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Jonathan C Pang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Brandon M Lehrich
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yarah M Haidar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Tjoson Tjoa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deng X, Lu Z, Wang X, Zhang J, Liu S, Zhang M, Meng J, Chen D, Ma S, Li H. The efficacy of function-preservation in treating paranasal sinus and nasal cavity neoplasms. Indian J Cancer 2021; 59:380-386. [PMID: 34380838 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_843_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Craniofacial resection (CFR) has been regarded as the gold standard for paranasal sinus and nasal cavity (PNSNC) neoplasms. The improvement of surgical procedures has been ongoing in recent years. We analyzed the clinical curative effects of the function-preservation therapy that was mainly using nasal endoscopic surgery along with appropriate radiotherapy and chemotherapy as applicable. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of factors that influence the survival time of the 28 patients with PNSNC neoplasms who underwent nasal endoscopic surgery. All patients with tumor lesions underwent a complete resection in en bloc or piecemeal resection. Five cases did not undergo radiotherapy or chemotherapy; the remaining 23 patients had multimodality therapy. Results The median follow-up time was 41.5 (range = 14-97) months. The overall 3-year survival rate was 78.57% for T3 cancer and 50% for those with T4. T classification (P = 0.031) and multimodality therapy (P = 0.038) were independent prognostic factors for postoperative 3-year survival rate of patients with PNSNC neoplasms. Conclusion Function-preservation therapy based on the minimally invasive endoscopic resection (MIER) with appropriate adjuvant therapy not only prolonged the overall survival time but also provided an opportunity to preserve organ function at the same time, which helped to improve the patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoli Deng
- Key laboratory of Xinjiang Phytomedicine Resource and Utilization, Ministry of Education, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xin jiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoyi Lu
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Junjie Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Shixian Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingjie Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Deshang Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiyin Ma
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Narrative Reappraisal of the Current Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112835. [PMID: 34200193 PMCID: PMC8201377 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas are a group of diverse tumors affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. As a direct consequence of their rarity and heterogeneity, diagnosis is challenging, and treatment does not follow universally accepted protocols. Though surgery represents the mainstay of treatment, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have pivotal roles in improving outcomes of patients treated with curative intent. Indications to endoscopic surgery have been expanding over the last three decades, but a considerable number of patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma still need open surgical procedures. Management of the neck in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is controversial. Curative-intended treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic tumors, alongside palliation of uncurable cases, represent poorly explored aspects of this disease. Abstract Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is a rare tumor affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Several aspects of this disease, ranging from epidemiology to biology, pathology, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and post-treatment surveillance are controversial, and consensus on how to manage this sinonasal cancer is lacking. A narrative literature review was performed to summarize the current evidence and provide the reader with available data supporting the decision-making process in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma, alongside the authors’ personal opinion on the unsolved issues of this tumor. The review has highlighted several advances in molecular definition of epithelial cancers of the sinonasal tract. Surgery represents the pivot of treatment and is performed through an endoscopic transnasal approach whenever feasible. Open surgery is required for a large proportion of cases. Reconstruction of the defect follows principles of skull base and cranio-maxillo-facial reconstruction. Chemotherapy is given as neoadjuvant treatment or concomitantly to radiotherapy. Photon-based radiation therapy has a crucial role in the adjuvant setting. Particle therapy is providing promising results. Management of the neck should be planned based on the presence of clinically appreciable metastases, primary tumor extension, and need for recipient vessels. Biotherapy and immunotherapy are still underexplored therapeutical modalities.
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang CC, Lin WJ, Liu YC, Chen CC, Wu SH, Liu SA, Liang KL. Transoral Robotic Surgery for Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Cancers-A Prospective Medium-Term Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10050967. [PMID: 33801167 PMCID: PMC7957508 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been used for treating pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers for many years. However, the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before TORS, the sparing rate of adjuvant irradiation after TORS, and the long-term oncologic/functional outcomes of TORS are seldom reported. From September 2014 to May 2018, 30 patients with clinical T1 to T3 cancers of oropharynx (7), larynx (3), and hypopharynx (20) were prospectively recruited for TORS in a tertiary referral medical center. Twelve (40%) patients had clinical early stage (I or II) disease, and 18 (60%) patients had late-stage (III or IV) disease. All 30 patients were suggested to receive TORS with neck dissection. Cisplatin-based NACT was given to 11 patients before the surgery, and it led to a 100% reduction in tumor size. Only 40% of patients needed adjuvant irradiation with a mean dosage of 5933 cGY after TORS. After a mean follow up of 38.9± 14.7 months, the Kaplan-Meier method estimated 5-year disease-specific survival, and organ preservation was 86.3% and 96.2%, respectively. Twenty-five patients were alive without tracheostomy and tube feeding. We found that NACT is a potential method for facilitating tumor resection and TORS effectively de-escalated adjuvant irradiation with a satisfactory 5-year survival and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Chi Wang
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (Y.-C.L.); (S.-A.L.); (K.-L.L.)
- School of Speech Language Pathology & Audiology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40121, Taiwan
- Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan; (W.-J.L.); (S.-H.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-4-23592525 (ext. 83601)
| | - Wen-Jiun Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan; (W.-J.L.); (S.-H.W.)
| | - Yi-Chun Liu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (Y.-C.L.); (S.-A.L.); (K.-L.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan;
| | - Chien-Chih Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan;
- Ph. D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
| | - Shang-Heng Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan; (W.-J.L.); (S.-H.W.)
| | - Shih-An Liu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (Y.-C.L.); (S.-A.L.); (K.-L.L.)
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan; (W.-J.L.); (S.-H.W.)
| | - Kai-Li Liang
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (Y.-C.L.); (S.-A.L.); (K.-L.L.)
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan; (W.-J.L.); (S.-H.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yeung JT, Caminer DM, Young IM, Sughrue ME, Teo C. Radical Exenteration of the Skull Base for End-Stage, Locally Advanced Sinonasal Malignancies: Challenging the Dictum of Unresectability. World Neurosurg 2021; 150:e102-e107. [PMID: 33647490 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of surgery is not well defined in locally advanced sinonasal cancers with intracranial involvement after all medical options have been exhausted. We hypothesize that patients whose tumors are deemed unresectable and referred to palliative care may benefit from radical salvage surgery. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients with malignant, locally advanced (stage T4b) sinonasal cancers with intracranial involvement from 2000 to 2020, inclusive. Data were collected on the patient demographics, details of chemotherapy, radiation, histology, perioperative complications, surgical approaches, and survival. We compared the survival outcomes of patients with different duration of disease before presentation. RESULTS We identified 17 patients who had undergone salvage surgical resection of treatment-recalcitrant, locally advanced sinonasal tumors. Almost all patients had undergone prior surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Perioperative complications occurred in 6 of 17 patients with 1 death. Patients with clinically less aggressive disease had significantly longer progression-free and overall survival compared with the more aggressive group. CONCLUSIONS Salvage surgery for locally advanced sinonasal cancers with intracranial invasion that is recalcitrant to all other therapies should be considered for patients who otherwise have no other treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacky T Yeung
- Centre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - David M Caminer
- Centre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Department of Plastic Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Michael E Sughrue
- Centre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Charles Teo
- Centre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abdelmeguid AS, Teeramatwanich W, Roberts DB, Amit M, Ferraroto R, Glisson BS, Kupferman ME, Su SY, Phan J, Garden AS, Raza SM, DeMonte F, Hanna EY. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses. Cancer 2021; 127:1788-1795. [PMID: 33567468 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common type of sinonasal malignancy. Despite improvements in surgical resection and adjuvant therapy, which are considered the standard of care, the outcome for patients with locoregionally advanced disease remains poor. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of induction chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma and to determine the oncologic outcomes in those patients. METHODS The study included 123 consecutive patients with previously untreated, locoregionally advanced (stage III and IV) sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with curative intent at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1988 and 2017 with induction chemotherapy followed by definitive local therapy. Patient demographics, tumor staging, treatment details, and oncologic outcomes were reviewed. The outcomes of this study included response to induction chemotherapy, recurrence, organ preservation, and survival. RESULTS The median follow-up was 32.6 months (range, 12.4-240 months). Of the 123 patients, 110 (89%) had T4 disease, and 13 (11%) had T3 disease. Lymph node metastasis at the time of presentation was observed in 36 patients (29.3%). The overall stage was stage IV in 111 patients (90.2%) and stage III in 12 patients (9.8%). The chemotherapy regimen consisted of the combination of a platinum and taxanes in most cases (109 patients; 88.6%), either as a doublet (41 patients) or in combination with a third agent, such as 5-fluorouracil (34 patients), ifosfamide (26 patients), or cetuximab (8 patients). After induction chemotherapy, 71 patients (57.8%) achieved at least a partial response, and 6 patients had a complete response. Subsequent treatment after induction chemotherapy was either: 1) definitive chemoradiation or radiation followed by surgical salvage for any residual disease, or 2) surgery followed by adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation. Overall, 54 patients (49.5%) underwent surgical resection. The 2-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the whole cohort were 61.4% and 67.9%, respectively. The rate of orbital preservation was 81.5%. The recurrence rate was 26.8% (33 patients), and distant metastases occurred in 8 patients (6.5%). Patients who had at least a partial response or stable disease had significantly better overall and disease-free survival than those who had progressive disease (P = .028 and P = .021, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The current results indicate that a high proportion of patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma achieved a favorable response to induction chemotherapy. The data suggest that response to induction chemotherapy is associated with an improved outcome and a good chance of organ preservation. The oncologic outcomes in this cohort with locally advanced (mostly T4) disease are better than those historically reported in the literature. Further study of induction chemotherapy in patients with advanced sinonasal squamous carcinoma is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed S Abdelmeguid
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Dianna B Roberts
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Moran Amit
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Renata Ferraroto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bonnie S Glisson
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Kupferman
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shaan M Raza
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Franco DeMonte
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Farrell NF, Mace JC, Detwiller KY, Li R, Andersen PE, Smith TL, Clayburgh DR, Geltzeiler M. Predictors of survival outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 11:1001-1011. [PMID: 33226198 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is a rare malignancy that poses management challenges. Although surgery and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) remain therapeutic mainstays, induction chemotherapy (IC) has emerged as a useful adjunct with locally advanced disease. This study used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to examine treatment outcomes for patients diagnosed with SNSCC. METHODS The NCDB (2004-2015) was queried for cases with SNSCC. Multivariate hazard regression modeling was used to identify significant predictors of 24-month and 60-month overall survival (OS) including treatment modality. RESULTS A total of 3516 patients with SNSCC met inclusion criteria, including 1750 patients (49.8%) treated with surgery ± adjuvant therapy, 1352 (38.5%) treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) or CRT, 300 (8.5%) who underwent IC followed by definitive CRT, and 114 (3.2%) who received IC followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy. Hazard modeling for confirmed treatment modality significantly associated (p < 0.001) with OS after adjustment. Patients who received surgical intervention ± adjuvant therapy had lower 24-month and 60-month mortality risk compared to definitive RT or CRT (hazard ratio [HR] ≥ 1.97; p < 0.001) or IC followed by definitive CRT (HR ≥ 1.73; p < 0.001). Compared to primary surgery ± adjuvant therapy, patients undergoing IC then surgery had similar 24-month and 60-month OS (p ≥ 0.672) after adjustment. CONCLUSION Multimodality therapy, including surgical intervention, associates with improved OS after multifactorial adjustments. IC followed by surgery associated with improved OS compared to IC, followed by CRT and CRT alone. Study results highlight the utility of surgery toward optimizing OS in patients with SNSCC and demonstrates the potential utility of IC when primary surgical management is not preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nyssa Fox Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Jess C Mace
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Kara Y Detwiller
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.,Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Portland, OR
| | - Ryan Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Peter E Andersen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Daniel R Clayburgh
- Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Portland, OR.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Reyes C, Patel M, Solares CA. Sinonasal Malignancy and Orbital Exenteration Sparing Cancer Surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81:369-375. [PMID: 33072478 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This article reviews the most common locations and natural history of sinonasal carcinomas. It also reviews surgical indications and current evidence regarding adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. In the past, orbital clearance was generally done for ethmoid and maxillary cancers, even without a marked neoplastic infiltration; however, such indications have changed in the recent years due to advances in our understanding of the disease, as well as new chemotherapeutic and radiotherapy protocols. Surgical resection of tumors close to the orbit exhibits the challenging task of balancing treatment goals and patient's desires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo Reyes
- Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
| | - Mihir Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Emory University, Atlanta, Geogia, United States
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Emory University, Atlanta, Geogia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fleming JC, Morley I, Malik M, Orfaniotis G, Daniel C, Townley WA, Jeannon JP. Orbital exenteration and reconstruction in a tertiary UK institution: a 5-year experience. Orbit 2020; 40:306-315. [PMID: 32543976 DOI: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1775262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Orbital exenteration is a radical oncological surgery that is usually indicated for advanced primary orbital tumors or invasion from local malignancy. We report a 5-year series from a tertiary head and neck center with particular focus on our ablative and reconstructive approach. METHODS We performed a clinicopathological review of patients referred to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Head and Neck multidisciplinary team for management input of an orbital malignancy during the period of 2013 to 2018. Cases involving local invasion from sinonasal malignancy were excluded. The reconstructive approach, perioperative complications, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS 27 patients were identified and of those treated surgically, a radical extended orbital exenteration was required in almost half (44.4%), with squamous cell carcinoma being the most common pathology (55.6%). A concurrent neck dissection and parotidectomy were commonly performed with confirmed or suspected regional disease, or in the presence of high-risk pathological features. This approach resulted in favourable 2-year overall survival in these advanced stage cases of 84.6% and disease-free survival of 73.2%, with 92% achieving a negative surgical margin. The majority of treated patients required a free flap reconstruction, especially when an extended exenteration defect or adjuvant treatment was anticipated. The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used donor site, and we present our algorithm for reconstruction of these defects. CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary approach to advanced orbital malignancy with a comprehensive approach to surgical resection and reconstruction results in favorable oncological outcomes and addresses functional and cosmetic patient rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Fleming
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of ENT, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| | - I Morley
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of ENT, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| | - M Malik
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Orfaniotis
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of ENT, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| | - C Daniel
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - W A Townley
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of ENT, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| | - J P Jeannon
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of ENT, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sinonasal cancer: an overview of the emerging subtypes. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2020; 134:191-196. [PMID: 32160940 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215120000146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in immunohistochemistry have spearheaded major developments in our understanding and classification of sinonasal tumours. In the last decade, several new distinct histopathological entities of sinonasal cancer have been characterised. OBJECTIVES This review aims to provide a clinical update of the major emerging subtypes for the ENT surgeon and an overview of the management strategies available for this heterogeneous group of pathologies. CONCLUSION Although rare, knowledge of sinonasal neoplasm subtypes has implications for prognosis, treatment strategies and the development of novel therapeutic targets.
Collapse
|
24
|
Limaye S, Shreenivas A. Who knows the nose? – The tale of esthesioneuroblastoma and sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma. CANCER RESEARCH, STATISTICS, AND TREATMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_122_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
25
|
The value of preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasal cavity and paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinoma: A single institutional experience. Oral Oncol 2019; 101:104512. [PMID: 31869689 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the value of preoperative radiotherapy in the comprehensive treatment of locally advanced nasal cavity and paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinomas (LA-NPSCCs). MATERIALS This retrospective study included 140 patients with stage III-IVB NPSCCs treated with pre-/postoperative radiotherapy plus surgery. The complete resection rate, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and orbital content retention rate were calculated. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distance metastasis free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment groups were evaluated. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 92.3 months, the 5-year OS, LC, DMFS, and DFS of entire cohort were 62.0%, 65.5%, 85.4%, and 57.8%, respectively. The preoperative radiotherapy group achieved similar LC, DFS, DMFS, and OS rates compared to postoperative radiotherapy group, despite higher rates of stage IV and orbital content/apex invasion. The preoperative radiotherapy resulted in significantly improved complete resection rate (93.3% vs 38.0%, p < 0.001). In the preoperative radiotherapy group, one third of patients achieved pathologic complete response. The pCR subgroup achieved statistically higher 5-year OS, LC, DFS (p < 0.05), but similar 5-year DMFS (p > 0.05) compared to non-pCR subgroup. The actual orbital content retention rate in preoperative radiotherapy group was 85.7%, superior to 58.3% in postoperative radiotherapy group (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION On the basis of multimodality therapy becoming standard paradigm for LA-NPSCCs, preoperative radiotherapy significantly improved complete resection rate and orbital content retention rate. Therefore, preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery might be desirable for LA-NPSCCs, especially for those with organ preservation intention.
Collapse
|
26
|
Li R, Tian S, Zhu Y, Zhu W, Wang S. Management of orbital invasion in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: 15 years' experience. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 10:243-255. [PMID: 31756058 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was intended to review our management strategy for sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas (SNSCCs) with orbital invasion and to explore the role of radiotherapy in orbital preservation. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 93 SNSCC patients with orbital invasion who underwent radiotherapy with or without surgery over the past 15 years. The degree of orbital invasion was classified into 3 grades. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients presented with T4 tumors and 36 had grade III orbital invasion. Seventy-two patients received surgery plus radiation and 67 received platinum-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 60 months. Five-year overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 57.4%. The patients treated with surgery plus radiation had a 5-year survival rate of 62.2% and orbital preservation was feasible in 90.3% of cases. Twenty-one patients with SNSCCs that extended into the extraocular muscles or eye globe also underwent orbital preservation. Five-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 69.5% for patients treated with orbital preservation and 57.1% for those treated with orbital exenteration, indicating no statistical difference. Five-year survival, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were similar between groups. Grade III orbital invasion was independently associated with shorter OS, LRFS, PFS, and DMFS. CONCLUSION Orbital invasion in grade III was associated with the worst survival outcomes. Invasion of either the extraocular muscles or eye globe is not a contraindication for eye-sparing surgery. Preoperative chemoradiation continues to offer hope to patients with a strong desire to preserve their eyes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruichen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenjia Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengzi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Quan H, Yan L, Zhang H, Zou L, Yuan W, Wang S. Development and validation of a nomogram for prognosis of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9:1030-1040. [PMID: 31318493 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is a rare malignancy with varied outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for predicting survival of patients with SNSCC. METHODS From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 1766 patients diagnosed with SNSCC between 2004 and 2015. Patients were randomly separated into a training set and a validation set in 4:1 ratio. An external validation was also performed by a set of 74 SNSCC patients who had been treated in our department. We used the training set to build a nomogram based on stratified multivariable Cox proportional hazard models for predicting overall survival. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by concordance index and calibration curve. RESULTS Based on 1412 cases of the training cohort, our Cox regression analysis revealed that age, marital status, primary site, differentiation, T stage, N classification, M stage, and treatment modalities were associated with overall survival. A nomogram was established based on the results of multivariate analysis. The C-index values of the nomogram for predicting survival were superior to those of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system (0.745 vs 0.679 in the training cohort, 0.752 vs 0.656 in the validation set, and 0.678 vs 0.596 in the external validation set). The calibration plots demonstrated good consistency between the predicted and observed results. CONCLUSION We have developed a nomogram to accurately predict the clinical outcomes of SNSCC patients. This model was effective and can help clinicians to improve patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huatao Quan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiyan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lifen Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengzi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cabezas-Camarero S, de la Orden García V, García-Barberán V, Mediero-Valeros B, Subhi-Issa AI, Llovet García P, Bando-Polaino I, Merino Menéndez S, Pérez-Segura P, Díaz-Rubio E. Nasoethmoidal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma Treated with Cetuximab: Role of Liquid Biopsy and BEAMing in Predicting Response to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy. Oncologist 2019; 24:293-300. [PMID: 30602616 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (SNS-ITAC) are very rare tumors that resemble colorectal cancer in many of their pathological and molecular characteristics. Indeed, in most published series, 10%-14% of SNS-ITAC harbor mutations in KRAS. There is no standard systemic treatment in recurrent or metastatic SNS-ITAC, and there is no evidence of the use of any targeted agent in this entity. We present the case of a recurrent nasoethmoidal ITAC informed as RAS and BRAF wild-type by standard real-time polymerase chain reaction methods and treated with first-line cetuximab and irinotecan without response. Circulating tumor cells coupled to highly sensitive DNA analyses unveiled a mutation in KRAS exon 2 codon 12. Subsequent studies in the primary tumor using BEAMing detected a mutation in the same codon, confirming the KRAS mutated status of the tumor, and possibly explaining the absence of treatment response. This case exemplifies how liquid biopsy can aid in the correct and real-time molecular characterization of tumors even in a rare nonmetastatic cancer of the head and neck. KEY POINTS: Sinonasal intestinal type adenocarcinomas (SNS-ITAC) are rare tumors that commonly develop after a prolonged exposure to organic dusts (wood, leather, etc.), and that resemble colorectal cancer in some of their morphological and molecular characteristics.KRAS mutations have been described in 10%-14% in most series. However, its predictive value for guiding treatment decisions with targeted therapies (i.e., anti-epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] therapy) has not been defined.The first case of an SNS-ITAC treated with anti-EGFR therapy (cetuximab) is reported. Analysis of DNA from circulating tumor cells (CTCs) unveiled a mutation in KRAS not detected by standard methods in the primary tumor. However, RAS analysis using BEAMing detected a mutation in the primary tumor in the same codon of KRAS originally detected in CTCs, altogether possibly explaining the lack of treatment response.Liquid biopsy may allow for an accurate molecular diagnosis in rare, organ-confined tumors where few therapeutic options exist. Highly sensitive molecular diagnostics may aid in better characterizing rare entities harboring potentially druggable targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Cabezas-Camarero
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Virginia de la Orden García
- CTC Unit, Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Vanesa García-Barberán
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Mediero-Valeros
- CTC Unit, Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Patricia Llovet García
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Bando-Polaino
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Pedro Pérez-Segura
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Díaz-Rubio
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Balasubramanian D, Subramanian N, Marchi F, Camillo Carobbio A, Missale F, Thankappan K, Iyer S. Induction chemotherapy in sinonasal malignancies: A review of literature. JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_6_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
30
|
Khoury T, Jang D, Carrau R, Ready N, Barak I, Hachem RA. Role of induction chemotherapy in sinonasal malignancies: a systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 9:212-219. [DOI: 10.1002/alr.22229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tawfiq Khoury
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery; Duke University; Durham NC
| | - David Jang
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery; Duke University; Durham NC
| | - Ricardo Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery; Ohio State University Medical Center; Columbus OH
| | - Neal Ready
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine; Duke University; Durham NC
| | - Ian Barak
- Biostatistics Core, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics; Duke University School of Medicine; Durham NC
| | - Ralph Abi Hachem
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery; Duke University; Durham NC
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Orbital exenteration for sinonasal malignancies: indications, rehabilitation and oncologic outcomes. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 26:122-126. [DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
32
|
Kiong KL, de Souza NN, Sultana R, Iyer NG. Meta-analysis of induction chemotherapy as a selection marker for chemoradiation in the head and neck. Laryngoscope 2017; 128:1594-1601. [PMID: 29171671 DOI: 10.1002/lary.27011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many trials incorporate induction chemotherapy (IC) in selecting for organ preservation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). However, few studies examine IC response in predicting for chemoradiation therapy (CRT) response. This meta-analysis aims to determine the predictive accuracy of IC for subsequent response to CRT and overall survival (OS). DATA SOURCES Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane register. METHODS A systematic search identified studies from database inception to October 2016 that used IC prior to CRT as definitive treatment for advanced HNSCC. The sensitivities and specificities of IC response predicting for complete CRT response were calculated, and the results were pooled in a summary receiver operating curve. One-, 2- and 5-year OS data were extracted. RESULTS Seven studies (n = 423 patients) were analyzed for response and six (n = 439) for OS. Pooled median sensitivity and specificity of IC response predicting CRT response were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.98) and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.00-0.61), respectively. Patients were more likely to respond to CRT given previous response to IC (positive likelihood ratio = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.21-2.11) and less likely to respond to CRT if they failed to respond to IC (negative likelihood ratio = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07-0.38). At 2 years, good response to IC was a statistically significant prognostic marker with a risk ratio of 1.35 (95% CI: 1.12-1.64). CONCLUSION Our data suggests that patients with poor IC response will have poorer response to CRT and should be directed to other modalities. In contrast, good IC response does not guarantee a favorable outcome to CRT; however, because these patients are likely to have better prognoses, they should be offered salvage therapies of curative intent despite treatment failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA. Laryngoscope, 128:1594-1601, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nurun Nisa de Souza
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore
| | | | - N Gopalakrishna Iyer
- Singhealth/Duke-NUS Head and Neck Centre, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
López F, Lund VJ, Suárez C, Snyderman CH, Saba NF, Robbins KT, Vander Poorten V, Strojan P, Mendenhall WM, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. The Impact of Histologic Phenotype in the Treatment of Sinonasal Cancer. Adv Ther 2017; 34:2181-2198. [PMID: 28871554 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-017-0605-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The management of sinonasal cancer is a challenge due to its low occurrence and anatomical and significant diversity of histological types. The therapeutic modality used should be tailored individually according to the histology, tumour stage, molecular profile and previous treatments. The clinical management of sinonasal cancer has improved greatly owing to developments in endoscopic surgery and precision radiotherapy. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of sinonasal malignancies' management but multimodality therapy is associated with improved outcomes in certain histologies. The recognition of various histological types with biological behaviours more suitable for non-surgical modalities has allowed treatment protocols to become more tailored to the disease. In this review we aim to describe and to summarise the current data guiding the management of sinonasal cancer with emphasis on phenotypic variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando López
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Valerie J Lund
- Professorial Unit, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carlos Suárez
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K Thomas Robbins
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, ILL, USA
| | - Vincent Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Robin TP, Jones BL, Gordon OM, Phan A, Abbott D, McDermott JD, Goddard JA, Raben D, Lanning RM, Karam SD. A comprehensive comparative analysis of treatment modalities for sinonasal malignancies. Cancer 2017; 123:3040-3049. [PMID: 28369832 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Revised: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal malignancies are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors for which there is a paucity of robust data with which to guide management decisions. The authors used the National Cancer Data Base to better understand the presenting characteristics of these tumors and to compare outcomes by treatment modality. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for sinonasal malignancies diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. Overall survival was assessed using multivariate analyses and propensity score matching. RESULTS A total of 11,160 patients were identified for the initial analysis. The majority were male, aged 40 to 69 years, with tumors of the nasal cavity or maxillary sinus. Squamous cell histology was most common. The majority of patients presented with advanced tumor stage but without locoregional lymph node or distant metastases. Treatment modalities were compared for squamous cell carcinomas. In multivariate analysis, compared with surgery alone, patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.658 [P<.001]), adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (HR, 0.696 [P = .002]), or neoadjuvant therapy (HR, 0.656 [P = .007]) had improved overall survival. Patients who received radiotherapy alone (HR, 1.294 [P = .001]) or chemotherapy alone (HR, 1.834 [P<.001]) had worse outcomes. These findings were validated in propensity score matching. It is important to note that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with achieving a negative surgical margin (odds ratio, 2.641 [P = .045]). CONCLUSIONS Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for patients with sinonasal malignancies, but multimodality therapy is associated with improved overall survival. Cancer 2017;123:3040-49. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler P Robin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Bernard L Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Oren M Gordon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Andy Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Diana Abbott
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado Biostatistics Consortium, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jessica D McDermott
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Julie A Goddard
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Raben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Ryan M Lanning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|