Orbital exenteration and reconstruction in a tertiary UK institution: a 5-year experience

PURPOSE

Orbital exenteration is a radical oncological surgery that is usually indicated for advanced primary orbital tumors or invasion from local malignancy. We report a 5-year series from a tertiary head and neck center with particular focus on our ablative and reconstructive approach.

METHODS

We performed a clinicopathological review of patients referred to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Head and Neck multidisciplinary team for management input of an orbital malignancy during the period of 2013 to 2018. Cases involving local invasion from sinonasal malignancy were excluded. The reconstructive approach, perioperative complications, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

27 patients were identified and of those treated surgically, a radical extended orbital exenteration was required in almost half (44.4%), with squamous cell carcinoma being the most common pathology (55.6%). A concurrent neck dissection and parotidectomy were commonly performed with confirmed or suspected regional disease, or in the presence of high-risk pathological features. This approach resulted in favourable 2-year overall survival in these advanced stage cases of 84.6% and disease-free survival of 73.2%, with 92% achieving a negative surgical margin. The majority of treated patients required a free flap reconstruction, especially when an extended exenteration defect or adjuvant treatment was anticipated. The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used donor site, and we present our algorithm for reconstruction of these defects.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach to advanced orbital malignancy with a comprehensive approach to surgical resection and reconstruction results in favorable oncological outcomes and addresses functional and cosmetic patient rehabilitation.

Shame and non-disclosure: a study of the emotional isolation of people referred for psychotherapy

Thirty-four people referred to an NHS psychotherapy department were given a modified form of Oatley and Duncan's (1992) emotion diary which included questions about whether each recorded emotion had been subsequently disclosed to anyone (for example a partner, friend or professional). One week later the diaries were collected and participants interviewed. Interviews focused, among other things, on reasons for nondisclosure of recorded emotional experiences and the relationship between shame and non-disclosure. The results indicated that a majority of the emotional incidents recorded in the diaries were not disclosed (68%). This result contrasts with studies on non-clinical samples in which only approximately 10% of everyday emotions are kept secret. Qualitative analysis of the interview data revealed that participants appeared to be habitual non-disclosers of emotional and personal experiences and that non-disclosure was related to the anticipation of negative interpersonal responses to disclosure (in particular labelling and judging responses) in addition to more self-critical factors including shame. It is suggested that these results add to the existing literature on shame by illustrating the interpersonal effects of shame in a clinical sample.

Debating goodwill

Despite its intangible and ephemeral nature, goodwill, alongside the building, equipment, and fixtures and fittings, is now accepted as one of the four principal elements in the valuation of any established dental practice.