1
|
Meena RK, Reddy KS, Gautam R, Maddela S, Reddy AR, Gudipalli P. Improved photosynthetic characteristics correlated with enhanced biomass in a heterotic F 1 hybrid of maize (Zea mays L.). PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH 2021; 147:253-267. [PMID: 33555518 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-021-00822-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Heterosis is a phenomenon wherein F1 hybrid often displays phenotypic superiority and surpasses its parents in terms of growth and agronomic traits. Investigations on the physiological and biochemical properties of the heterotic F1 hybrid are important to uncover the mechanisms underlying heterosis in plants. In the present study, the photosynthetic capacity of a heterotic F1 hybrid of Zea mays L. (DHM 117) that exhibited a higher growth rate and increased biomass was compared with its parental inbreds at vegetative and reproductive stages in the field during 2017 and 2018. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E) as well as foliar carbohydrates were higher in F1 hybrid than parental inbreds at vegetative and reproductive stages. An increase in total chlorophyll content along with better chlorophyll a fluorescence characteristics including effective quantum yield of photosystem II (ΔF/Fm'), maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), photochemical quenching (qp) and decreased non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) was observed in F1 hybrid than the parental inbreds. Further, the expression of potential genes related to C4 photosynthesis was considerably upregulated in F1 hybrid than the parental inbreds during vegetative and reproductive stages. Moreover, the F1 hybrid exhibited distinct heterosis in yield with 63% and 62% increase relative to parental inbreds during 2017 and 2018. We conclude that improved photosynthetic efficiency associated with increased foliar carbohydrates could have contributed to higher growth rate, biomass and yield in the F1 hybrid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Kumar Meena
- Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, 500 046, Telangana, India
| | - Kanubothula Sitarami Reddy
- Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, 500 046, Telangana, India
| | - Ranjana Gautam
- Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, 500 046, Telangana, India
| | - Surender Maddela
- Institute of Biotechnology, Prof. Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 500 030, Telangana, India
| | - Attipalli Ramachandra Reddy
- Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, 500 046, Telangana, India
| | - Padmaja Gudipalli
- Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, 500 046, Telangana, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang D, Mu Y, Hu X, Ma B, Wang Z, Zhu L, Xu J, Huang C, Pan Y. Comparative proteomic analysis reveals that the Heterosis of two maize hybrids is related to enhancement of stress response and photosynthesis respectively. BMC PLANT BIOLOGY 2021; 21:34. [PMID: 33422018 PMCID: PMC7796551 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02806-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterosis refers to superior traits exhibiting in a hybrid when compared with both parents. Generally, the hybridization between parents can change the expression pattern of some proteins such as non-additive proteins (NAPs) which might lead to heterosis. 'Zhongdan808' (ZD808) and 'Zhongdan909' (ZD909) are excellent maize hybrids in China, however, the heterosis mechanism of them are not clear. Proteomics has been wildly used in many filed, and comparative proteomic analysis of hybrid and its parents is helpful for understanding the mechanism of heterosis in the two maize hybrids. RESULTS Over 2000 protein groups were quantitatively identified from second seedling leaves of two hybrids and their parents by label-free quantification. Statistical analysis of total identified proteins, differentially accumulated proteins (DAPs) and NAPs of the two hybrids revealed that both of them were more similar to their female parents. In addition, most of DAPs were up-regulated and most of NAPs were high parent abundance or above-high parent abundance in ZD808, while in ZD909, most of DAPs were down-regulated and most of NAPs were low parent abundance or below-low parent abundance. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that more of stress response-related NAPs in ZD808 were high parent abundance or above-high parent abundance, and most of PS related NAPs in ZD909 were high parent abundance or above-high parent abundance. Finally, four stress response-related proteins and eight proteins related to PS were verified by PRM, ten of them had significant differences between hybrid and midparent value. CONCLUSIONS Even though every one of the two hybrids were more similar to its female parent at proteome level, the biological basis of heterosis is different in the two maize hybrids. In comparison with their parents, the excellent agronomic traits of hybrid ZD808 is mainly correlated with the high expression levels of some proteins related to stress responses and metabolic functions, while traits of ZD909 is mainly correlated with high expressed proteins related to photosynthesis. Our proteomics results support previous physiological and morphological research and have provided useful information in understanding the reason of valuable agronomic traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daoping Wang
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongying Mu
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaojiao Hu
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China
- National Engineering Laboratory for Crop Molecular Breeding, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Ma
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhibo Wang
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Zhu
- Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiang Xu
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China
| | - Changling Huang
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
- National Engineering Laboratory for Crop Molecular Breeding, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yinghong Pan
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
- National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|