FDG PET/CT for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

The role of FDG PET/CT is uncertain in squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP). Published data are limited by heterogeneity of pathology, varied diagnostic criteria, and small sample size.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in 40 patients who had FDG PET/CT for SCCUP. Prior to PET/CT, patients had underwent standard clinical evaluations including flexible rhinolaryngoscopy. The majority of the patients had anatomic imaging. All subjects had histopathological investigations, and follow-up data after PET/CT.

RESULTS

FDG PET/CT detected the primary in 16 of 40 patients (40%), and the most common locations of the primary were in the base of the tongue, palatine tonsil, and hypopharynx. There were 10 false positive and 6 false negative PET/CT scans. There was no difference in the mean SUVs of the suspected primary lesions between true and false positive groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy of FDG PET/CT for SCCUP in this patient cohort were 72.7% (16/22), 44.4% (8/18), 61.5% (16/26), 57.1% (8/14), and 60% (24/40), respectively. The tonsil was the site with the most false positive and false negative findings.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG PET/CT might be an effective single shot of whole-body imaging for detection of the primary in SCCUP. Low specificity remained the most notable weakness of FDG-PET in work-up for SCCUP. In addition to varied physiologic uptake or inflammatory related uptake in the common locations of the primary, the image indication bias might be another significant contributor of high false positive rate.

AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines? Guideline recommendations for head and neck cancer of unknown primary site

This article reviews the clinical practice guidelines for head and neck oncology focusing on the management of head and neck cancers of unknown primary (CUP). The primary purpose of this series is to raise awareness of the current guidelines in head and neck oncology by reviewing the recommendations and the evidence supporting such recommendations, particularly those published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). We review the importance of a thorough history and physical examination, the impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition changes and the importance of immunohistochemistry, the timing and type of imaging, the role of panendoscopy and tonsillectomy (palatine and lingual), and the role of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy in the primary management of these tumors.

18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of the primary tumor in adults with extracervical metastases from cancer of unknown primary: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of cancers, so called when a biopsy from a patient reveals malignancy without giving a clue to where in the body the primary tumor is located. Whole-body 18-fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission-tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is widely used for diagnosis and staging of most cancers. We hypothesized that 18F-FDG PET/CT-especially if used early-is suitable for the detection of the primary tumor in patients with CUP.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect the primary tumor in adult CUP patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies on CUP from extracervical metastases in which every patient had received an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and at least one 18F-FDG PET/CT-positive finding was confirmed by biopsy or clinical follow-up.

STUDY APPRAISAL

PRISMA and QUADAS-2 were applied.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

The pooled detection rate (DR) of 18F-FDG PET/CT was assessed with a fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the I-squared statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 2953 articles were identified from which N = 82 were assessed by full text and N = 20, comprising 1942 adult patients, were included in the study. Median (range) number of patients and DR was N = 72 (21-316) and 36.3% (9.8%-75.3%), respectively. Two-thirds of included studies were retrospective, and the pooled DR was 40.93% (95% confidence interval: 38.99%-42.87%). There was large heterogeneity between studies (I-squared = 95.9%), randomization was not applied, CUP diagnosis was not standardized, and workup (if described) was characterized by multiple testing procedures resulting in a highly selected, challenging patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite great heterogeneity in diagnostic workup and in studies in general, an overall DR of 40.93% suggests that upfront application of 18F-FDG PET/CT may have a role in CUP by obviating a great many futile diagnostic procedures. To what degree 18F-FDG PET/CT used early in the course of disease may improve the detection rate could not be deducted from selected articles. A large, prospective, preferably randomized, study on the potential benefit of using 18F-FDG PET/CT up front in CUP patients is warranted to judge if and when 18F-FDG PET/CT should be applied in these patients.