Biatrial pacing vs. intravenous amiodarone in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

Nonpharmacologic rate control of postoperative atrial fibrillation in the canine sterile pericarditis model

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common following open heart surgery, and is associated with significant morbidity. Medications used for ventricular rate control of POAF may not be effective in controlling rapid ventricular rates during the postoperative period because of increased sympathetic tone. The purpose of this study was to develop nonpharmacologic rate control of POAF by atrioventricular node (AVN) fat pad stimulation using clinically available temporary pacing wires in the canine sterile pericarditis model.

METHODS

We studied 10 sterile pericarditis dogs in the closed-chest state on postoperative days 1-3. The AVN fat pad stimulation (amplitude 2-15 mA; frequency 20 Hz; pulse width 0.03-0.2 ms) was performed during sustained POAF (>5 min). We measured ventricular rate and inefficient ventricular contractions during sustained POAF and compared it with and without AVN fat pad stimulation. Also, the parameters of AVN fat pad stimulation to achieve a rate control of POAF were measured over the postoperative days.

RESULTS

Eleven episodes of sustained POAF were induced in 5/10 sterile pericarditis dogs in the closed-chest state on postoperative days 1-2. During POAF, the AVN fat pad stimulation decreased the ventricular rate from 178 ± 52 bpm to 100 ± 8 bpm in nine episodes. Nonpharmacologic rate control therapy successfully controlled the ventricular rate and eliminated inefficient ventricular contractions during POAF for the duration of the AVN fat pad stimulation. The AVN fat pad stimulation output remained relatively stable over the postoperative days.

CONCLUSION

During sustained POAF, nonpharmacologic rate control by AVN fat pad stimulation effectively and safely controlled rapid ventricular rates throughout the postoperative period.

Prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a quality improvement project

PURPOSE

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) has an incidence of 20-60% in cardiac surgery. The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Practice Advisory have recommended postoperative beta blockers and amiodarone for the prevention of POAF. By employing quality improvement (QI) strategies, we sought to increase the use of these agents and to reduce the incidence of POAF among our patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This single-centre QI initiative followed the traditional Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle scientific methodology. A POAF risk score was developed to categorize all patients undergoing cardiac surgery as either normal or elevated risk. Risk stratification was incorporated into a preprinted prescribing guide, which recommended postoperative beta blockade for all patients and a postoperative amiodarone protocol for patients with elevated risk starting on postoperative day one (POD1). A longitudinal audit of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery was conducted over 11 months to track the use of prophylactic medications and the incidence of POAF.

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty patients undergoing surgery were included in the QI initiative from 1 December 2020 to 1 November 2021. The baseline rate of POAF across all surgical subtypes was 39% (198/560). The use of prophylactic amiodarone in high-risk patients increased from 13% (1/8) at the start of the project to 41% (48/116) at the end of the audit period. The percentage of patients receiving a beta blocker on POD1 did fluctuate, but remained essentially unchanged throughout the audit (34.8% in December 2020 vs 46.7% in October 2021). After 11 months, the overall incidence of POAF was 29% (24.9% relative reduction). Notable reductions in the incidence of POAF were observed in more complex surgical subtypes by the end of the audit, including multiple valve replacement (89% vs 56%), aortic repair (50% vs 33%), and mitral valve surgery (45% vs 33%).

CONCLUSIONS

This single-centre QI intervention increased the use of prophylactic amiodarone by 28% for patients at elevated risk of POAF, with no change in the early postoperative initiation of beta blockers (46.7% of patients by POD1). There was a notable reduction in the incidence of POAF in patients at elevated risk undergoing surgery.

Preoperative Use of Oral Beta-Adrenergic Blocking Agents and the Incidence of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Current epidemiological data suggests that postoperative atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (POAF) causes significant morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. The literature for prophylactic management of POAF is limited, resulting in the lack of clear guidelines on management recommendations.

AIM

To examine the efficacy of prophylactic rate control agents in reducing the incidence of new-onset POAF in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and Medline were systematically searched for blinded randomised controlled studies (RCT) evaluating adults with no history of atrial fibrillation randomised to a pharmacological agent (either beta blocker, calcium channel blocker or digoxin), compared to placebo. Utilising Cochrane guidance, three reviewers screened, extracted and the quality of the evidence was assessed. We used a random effects meta-analysis to compare a rate-control agent with placebo.

RESULTS

Five RCTs (688 subjects, mean age 61±8.9, 69% male) were included. Beta blocker administration prior to elective cardiac surgery significantly reduced the incidence of POAF (OR 0.43, 95%Cl [0.30-0.61], I²=0%) without significant impact on ischaemic stroke (OR 0.49, 95%Cl [0.10-2.44], I²=0%), non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.76, 95%Cl [0.08-7.44], I²=0%), overall mortality (OR 0.83, 95%Cl [0.19-3.66], I²=0%), or length of stay (mean -0.96days 95%Cl [-1.49 to -0.42], I²=0%). An increased rate of bradycardic episodes was observed (OR 3.53, 95%Cl [1.22-10.23], I²=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that selective administration of prophylactic oral beta blockers prior to elective cardiac surgery is safe and may reduce the incidence of POAF.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanisms, and clinical correlates

Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly encountered arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. Although usually self-limiting, it represents an important predictor of increased patient morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Numerous studies have attempted to determine the underlying mechanisms of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) with varied success. A multifactorial pathophysiology is hypothesized, with inflammation and postoperative β-adrenergic activation recognized as important contributing factors. The management of POAF is complicated by a paucity of data relating to the outcomes of different therapeutic interventions in this population. This article reviews the literature on epidemiology, mechanisms, and risk factors of POAF, with a subsequent focus on the therapeutic interventions and guidelines regarding management.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is a common post-operative complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with an increased risk of post-operative stroke, increased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, healthcare costs and mortality. Numerous trials have evaluated various pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylactic interventions for their efficacy in preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation. We conducted an update to a 2004 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia after cardiac surgery. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects on post-operative stroke or cerebrovascular accident, mortality, cardiovascular mortality, length of hospital stay and cost of treatment during the hospital stay.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of ControlLed Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 8, 2011), MEDLINE (from 1946 to July 2011), EMBASE (from 1974 to July 2011) and CINAHL (from 1981 to July 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were allocated to pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia, except digoxin, potassium (K(+)), or steroids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted study data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen studies with 138 treatment groups and 17,364 participants were included in this review. Fifty-seven of these studies were included in the original version of this review while 61 were added, including 27 on interventions that were not considered in the original version. Interventions included amiodarone, beta-blockers, sotalol, magnesium, atrial pacing and posterior pericardiotomy. Each of the studied interventions significantly reduced the rate of post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery compared with a control. Beta-blockers (odds ratio (OR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval) CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 55%) and sotalol (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 3%) appear to have similar efficacy while magnesium's efficacy (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.73; I(2) = 51%) may be slightly less. Amiodarone (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.54; I(2) = 63%), atrial pacing (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.61; I(2) = 50%) and posterior pericardiotomy (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.67; I(2) = 66%) were all found to be effective. Prophylactic intervention decreased the hospital length of stay by approximately two-thirds of a day and decreased the cost of hospital treatment by roughly $1250 US. Intervention was also found to reduce the odds of post-operative stroke, though this reduction did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.01; I(2) = 0%). No significant effect on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery with any of the studied pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may be favored because of its reduction in the rate of atrial fibrillation, decrease in the length of stay and cost of hospital treatment and a possible decrease in the rate of stroke. However, this review is limited by the quality of the available data and heterogeneity between the included studies. Selection of appropriate interventions may depend on the individual patient situation and should take into consideration adverse effects and the cost associated with each approach.