Evaluating the child with syncope

Syncope and Palpitations: A Review

Syncope and palpitations are common complaints for patients presenting to their primary care provider. They represent symptoms that most often have a benign etiology but rarely can be the first warning sign of a serious condition, such as arrhythmias, structural heart disease, or noncardiac disease. The history, physical examination, and noninvasive testing can, in most cases, distinguish benign from pathologic causes. This article introduces syncope and palpitations, with emphasis on the differential diagnoses, initial presentation, diagnostic strategy, and various management strategies.

Cost of Unnecessary Testing in the Evaluation of Pediatric Syncope

Syncope is a common and a typically benign clinical problem in children and adolescents. The majority of tests ordered in otherwise healthy pediatric patients presenting with syncope have low diagnostic yield. This study quantifies testing and corresponding patient charges in a group of pediatric patients presenting for outpatient evaluation for syncope. Patients seen between 3/2011 and 4/2013 in the multi-disciplinary Syncope Clinic at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center were enrolled in a registry which was reviewed for patient information. The electronic medical record was used to determine which syncope patients underwent cardiac (electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, or exercise testing) or neurologic (head CT/MRI or electroencephalogram) testing within the interval from 3 months before to 3 months after the Syncope Clinic visit. Testing charges were obtained through hospital billing records. 442 patients were included for analysis; 91% were Caucasian; 65.6% were female; median age was 15.1 years (8.1-21.2 years). Cardiac and neurologic testing was common in this population. While some testing was performed during the Syncope Clinic visit, 46% of the testing occurred before or after the visit. A total of $1.1 million was charged to payers for cardiac and neurological testing with an average total charge of $2488 per patient. Despite the typically benign etiology of pediatric syncope, patients often have expensive and unnecessary cardiac and/or neurologic testing. Reducing or eliminating this unnecessary testing could have a significant impact on healthcare costs, especially as the economics of healthcare shift to more capitated systems.

The Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Syncope

Syncope is a common problem in children and adolescents. It is typically caused by benign neurally mediated hypotension, but other, more concerning, etiologies of syncope must be considered. In most instances, the underlying cause of syncope in the pediatric patient can be determined by obtaining a thorough history and physical examination. Attention to the cardiac, neurological, and psychological history and examination can rule out more rare causes of loss of consciousness. Most individuals with neurally mediated hypotension can be treated with lifestyle measures including aggressive hydration, dietary salt, and an exercise program. In instances where lifestyle modification fails, medications may offer symptomatic improvement.

The effect of paediatric syncope on health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

Syncope is common in children and adolescents and most commonly represents neurocardiogenic syncope. No information has been reported regarding the effect of syncope on health-related quality of life in children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients seen in the Heart Institute Syncope Clinic at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between July, 2009 and June, 2010. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the PedsQL™ tool. PedsQL™ scores were compared with both healthy historical controls and historical controls with chronic illnesses.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were included for analysis. In all, 90% were Caucasian and 63% were girls. The median age was 15.1 years (8.2-21.6). Compared with healthy controls, patients had lower PedsQL™ scores: Total score (75.2 versus 83.8, p < 0.0001); Physical Health Summary (78.8 versus 87.5, p < 0.0001); Psychosocial Health Summary (73.9 versus 81.9, p < 0.001), Emotional Functioning (68.9 versus 79.3, p < 0.001); and School Functioning (66.4 versus 81.1, p < 0.001). No difference was seen in Social Functioning (86.2 versus 85.2, p = 0.81). Patients also had lower PedsQL™ Total scores than patients with diabetes mellitus (p < 0.0001) and similar scores to patients with asthma, end-stage renal disease, obesity, and structural heart disease.

CONCLUSION

Children with syncope, although typically benign in aetiology, can have low health-related quality of life.

Common emergent pediatric neurologic problems

Although there are a variety of neurologic disease processes that the emergency physician should be aware of the most common of these include seizures, closed head injury, headache, and syncope. When one is evaluating a patient who has had a seizure, differentiating between febrile seizures, afebrile seizures, and SE helps to determine the extent of the work-up. Febrile seizures are typically benign, although a diagnosis of meningitis must not be missed. Educating parents regarding the likelihood of future seizures, and precautions to be taken should a subsequent seizure be witnessed, is important. The etiology of a first-time afebrile seizure varies with the patient's age at presentation, and this age-specific differential drives the diagnostic work-up. A follow-up EEG is often indicated, and imaging studies can appropriate on a nonurgent basis. Appropriate management of SE requires a paradigm of escalating pharmacologic therapy, and early consideration of transport for pediatric intensive care services if the seizure cannot be controlled with conventional three-tiered therapy. Closed head injury frequently is seen in the pediatric emergency care setting. The absence of specific clinical criteria to guide the need for imaging makes management of these children more difficult. A thorough history and physical examination is important to uncover risk factors that prompt emergent imaging. Headaches are best approached by assessing the temporal course, associated symptoms, and the presence of persistent neurologic signs. Most patients ultimately are diagnosed with either a tension or migraine headache; however, in those patients with a chronic progressive headache course, an intracranial process must be addressed and pursued with appropriate imaging. Syncope has multiple causes but can generally be categorized as autonomic, cardiac, or noncardiac. Although vasovagal syncope is the most common cause of syncope, vigilance is required to identify those patients with a potentially fatal arrhythmia or with heart disease that predisposes to hypoperfusion. As such, all patients who present with syncope should have an ECG. Additional work-up studies are guided by the results of individual history and physical examination.

What is the yield of screening echocardiography in pediatric syncope?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the yield of screening echocardiography in the evaluation of pediatric syncope.

DESIGN

All patients diagnosed with syncope from January 1993 to January 1999 were identified and their records were reviewed for age, weight, sex, year of presentation, personal and family history, physical examination, and cardiac diagnostic testing. Cardiac defects were identified by reviewing echocardiograms and reports.

RESULTS

The 480 patients (268 females) ranged in age from 1.5 to 18.0 years old and ranged in weight from 10.3 to 113.6 kg. Final diagnoses included noncardiac causes in 458, long QT syndrome in 14, arrhythmias in 6, and cardiomyopathy in 2. An abnormal history, physical examination, or electrocardiogram identified 21 of the 22 patients with a cardiac cause of syncope. Of the 322 (67%) echocardiograms performed, abnormalities were detected in 37. These abnormalities included 26 minor valve anomalies, 7 hemodynamically insignificant shunt lesions, 2 mildly decreased left ventricular shortening fractions, and 2 cardiomyopathies. Only the 2 cardiomyopathies were considered to be potential causes of syncope, and in both cases, the electrocardiogram was markedly abnormal. A similar percentage of echocardiograms were ordered during the first and last 3 years of the study (61% vs 71%).

CONCLUSION

History, physical examination, and electrocardiography provide a screening protocol that allows the identification of a cardiac cause of syncope in the overwhelming majority of pediatric patients. In the absence of a positive screen result, the echocardiogram does not contribute to the evaluation of syncope in children. We speculate that primary care providers and pediatric cardiologists continue to use echocardiography because of the paucity of data regarding its value in pediatric syncope. However, this study shows little benefit of screening echocardiography and should discourage its routine use.

Syncope in the pediatric patient. The cardiologist's perspective

The evaluation of syncopal children or adolescents relies heavily on a thorough, detailed history and physical examination. All syncope associated with exercise or exertion must be considered dangerous. The ECG is mandatory, but other laboratory tests are generally of limited value unless guided by pertinent positives or negatives in the history and physical examination. The ECG allows screening for dysrhythmias, such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, heart block, and long QT syndrome, as well as hypertrophic cardiomyopathies and myocarditis. Tilt table testing can be useful in selecting therapy by demonstrating the physiologic response leading to syncope in an individual patient. The most common type of syncope in otherwise healthy children and adolescents is neurocardiogenic or vasodepressor syncope, which is a benign and transient condition. Because syncope can be a predictor of sudden cardiac death, it must be taken seriously, and appropriate screening must be performed.

Syncope in children

The sudden loss of consciousness in a child is concerning to both patients and their parents. Although most cases of syncope in children are benign, an adequate evaluation is required to exclude life-threatening disorders. Patient history and physical examination may be sufficient to define the cause of syncope in a large percentage of pediatric cases. The events and setting preceding the syncopal episode provide clues in defining the nature of the event.

Specificity of head-up tilt testing in adolescents: effect of various degrees of tilt challenge in normal control subjects

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the specificity of commonly used tilt protocols in children.

BACKGROUND

Tilt table testing is commonly utilized in the evaluation of children and adolescents with syncope despite a lack of uniformity in tilt protocols and a lack of studies of specificity in normal control subjects.

METHODS

Sixty-nine normal control volunteers (12 to 18 years old, 38 male, 31 female) with no previous history of syncope, presyncope or arrhythmia underwent tilting to 80 degrees, 70 degrees or 60 degrees for a maximum of 30 min on a motorized table with a footboard support. Autonomic maneuvers, including deep breathing, carotid massage, Valsalva maneuver and diving reflex, were performed before tilt testing to determine whether the response to these maneuvers could identify subjects prone to fainting during tilt testing.

RESULTS

Symptoms of presyncope and frank syncope were elicited in 24 of 69 subjects (13 male, 11 female): 6 (60%) of 10 were tilted at 80 degrees, 9 (29%) of 31 at 70 degrees and 9 (32%) of 28 at 60 degrees. Tilt testing at 80 degrees was terminated after the tenth subject by the institutional review board. The mean time to a positive test response was 10.5 min at 80 degrees, 14.2 min at 70 degrees and 13.2 min at 60 degrees. In the 80 degrees tilt, 4 of 10 subjects had a positive response within 10 minutes, whereas only 3 of 31 and 2 of 28 had a positive response within < 10 min at 70 degrees and 60 degrees tilt angles, respectively. Subjects with and without a positive response to tilt testing were similar with respect to age; gender; PR, QRS and QT intervals; and baseline heart rate and blood pressure. Likewise, responses to other autonomic function tests performed were similar in tilt-positive and tilt-negative patients. The power for detecting a significant difference between patients tilted at 80 degrees versus 60 degrees and 70 degrees was 0.45 and for detecting differences in autonomic tone between tilt-positive (n = 24) and tilt-negative (n = 45) subjects was 0.8.

CONCLUSIONS

Children appear to be more susceptible to orthostatic stress than adults. Therefore, tilt protocols commonly used in adults lack specificity in teenage patients. A specificity > 85% may be obtained by performing the tilt test at 60 degrees or 70 degrees for no longer than 10 min.

Esmolol tilt testing with esmolol withdrawal for the evaluation of syncope in the young

BACKGROUND

Head-upright tilt (HUT) testing is valuable in evaluating syncope. Isoproterenol is used to increase sensitivity. However, isoproterenol is contraindicated or dangerous in undiagnosed heart disease and produces false-positives. We introduced esmolol withdrawal during esmolol HUT, hypothesizing that (1) acute withdrawal of the ultrashort-acting beta-blocker induces beta-adrenergic effects by unmasking endogenous catecholamines and may provoke syncope with fewer risks, and (2) response to esmolol/esmolol withdrawal may predict effective therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with unexplained recurrent syncope/presyncope (7 to 35 years old, known heart disease or arrhythmia in 14) underwent 2 to 4 HUT tests (60 degrees, 49 minutes): (1) baseline, (2) esmolol (500 micrograms/kg plus 50 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), (3) esmolol withdrawal (HUT continued after esmolol stopped), and (4) isoproterenol if tests 1 through 3 were negative and isoproterenol was not contraindicated. A positive test reproduced symptoms with hypotension or bradycardia, requiring recumbency for recovery. Twenty-five had positive tests, and 11 had negative tests. In 5, only the baseline test was positive; in 15, esmolol/esmolol withdrawal tests were also positive, with 3 in whom esmolol withdrawal was positive although negative at baseline. Two isoproterenol tilts were positive. Esmolol withdrawal and isoproterenol tilts had the highest initial heart rate and similar maximal heart rate increment. Only isoproterenol caused hypertension. One isoproterenol test was false-positive, with hypertension-induced arterial baroreflex. Treatment was beta-blockers (8), Na/fludrocortisone (9), both (6), and DDD pacemakers (2). Esmolol/esmolol withdrawal accurately predicted therapeutic response in 15; isoproterenol predicted therapeutic response in none.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol withdrawal tilt testing is preferable to isoproterenol for provocative testing of syncope in the young, and it appears to be safer. Esmolol withdrawal testing has clinical utility before invasive testing as a first-line investigation for syncope in patients with or without heart disease.

Causes of syncope in children: a prospective study

We prospectively evaluated 80 patients with syncope, between January 1991 and January 1992 to determine the causes of syncope in children. There were 35 male and 45 female patients, whose mean age was 10.5 years. A single syncopal attack had occurred in 30 patients and multiple attacks in 50. A cardiovascular cause was established in 22 (27.5%) patients and a noncardiovascular cause in 36 (45%). The cause remained unknown in 22 patients (27.5%). Vasovagal syncope was the leading cause of syncope in these patients with an incidence of 32.5%. These findings suggest that every patient who has even one syncopal attack should be promptly investigated since the underlying cause could be a life-threatening one.