Kuerbis A, Behrendt S, Morgenstern J. Age as a moderator of motivational interviewing and nondirective client-centered psychotherapy for alcohol use disorder: An exploratory study.
ALCOHOL, CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH 2023;
47:527-539. [PMID:
36871206 PMCID:
PMC10050112 DOI:
10.1111/acer.15015]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a widely used intervention applied to a host of health behaviors, including alcohol consumption among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Age is an underexplored moderator of MI for treating AUD, with the impact of comparing older individuals with their younger counterparts virtually unexplored. Also unexplored is whether age is associated with distinct mechanisms of change (e.g., motivation and self-efficacy) within treatment.
METHODS
This secondary data analysis utilizes combined data from two previous studies (total N = 228) that both aimed to test MI's mechanisms of action in the context of a goal for moderated drinking. Both studies had three conditions: MI, nondirective listening (NDL), and a self-change condition (SC). In the current analyses, the moderating impact of continuous age and age group, <51 (younger adults, YA) versus ≥51 (older adults, OA), on the impact of MI on alcohol use compared to NDL and SC were tested using generalized linear models. Age differences in confidence and commitment to reduce heavy drinking during treatment were also explored.
RESULTS
Age group by condition differences emerged, where NDL significantly reduced drinking among YA but not OA (mean -12 vs. -3 standard drinks, respectively). Among OA, MI outperformed NDL but not SC, though the effect was weak. Confidence and commitment during treatment were not significantly different across age-by-condition groups.
CONCLUSION
Findings underscore the importance of understanding the impact of age on treatment effectiveness, as providing a nondirective intervention for OA with AUD could provide suboptimal treatment. Further research is needed to explore these differential effects.
Collapse