Frequency of Recidivism in Patients With Orthopedic Trauma

Socioeconomic status is associated with greater hazard of post-discharge mortality than race, gender, and ballistic injury mechanism in a young, healthy, orthopedic trauma population

OBJECTIVES

To explore the utility of legacy demographic factors and ballistic injury mechanism relative to popular markers of socioeconomic status as prognostic indicators of 10-year mortality following hospital discharge in a young, healthy patient population with isolated orthopedic trauma injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate patients treated at an urban Level I trauma center from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2016. Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify upper and lower extremity fracture patients undergoing operative fixation. Exclusion criteria were selected to yield a patient population of isolated extremity trauma in young, otherwise healthy individuals between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Variables collected included injury mechanism, age, race, gender, behavior risk factors, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and insurance status. The primary outcome was post-discharge mortality, occurring at any point during the study period.

RESULTS

We identified 2539 patients with operatively treated isolated extremity fractures. The lowest two quartiles of socioeconomic status (SES) were associated with higher hazard of mortality than the highest SES quartile in multivariable analysis (Quartile 3 HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = 0.01; Quartile 4 HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1-4.3, p = 0.02). Not having private insurance was associated with higher mortality hazard in multivariable analysis (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3-3.2, p = 0.002). The presence of any behavioral risk factor was associated with higher mortality hazard in univariable analysis (HR: 1.8, p < 0.05), but this difference did not reach statistical significance in multivariable analysis (HR: 1.4, 95%: 0.8-2.3, p = 0.20). Injury mechanism (ballistic versus blunt), gender, and race were not associated with increased hazard of mortality (p > 0.20).

CONCLUSION

Low SES is associated with a greater hazard of long-term mortality than ballistic injury mechanism, race, gender, and medically diagnosable behavioral risk factors in a young, healthy orthopedic trauma population with isolated extremity injury.

Analysis of acute extremity compartment syndrome using a genealogic population database

INTRODUCTION

Acute extremity compartment syndrome ("CS") is an under-researched, highly morbid condition affecting trauma populations. The purpose of this study was to analyze incidence rates and risk factors for extremity compartment syndrome using a high-quality population database. Additionally, we evaluated heritable risk for CS using available genealogic data. We hypothesized that diagnosis of extremity compartment syndrome would demonstrate heritability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with fractures of the tibia, femur, and upper extremity were retrospectively identified by ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes from 1996 to 2020 in a statewide hospital database. Exposed and unexposed cohorts were created based on a diagnosis of CS. Available demographic data were analyzed to determine risk factors for compartment syndrome using logistic regression. Mortality risk at the final follow-up was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Patients with a diagnosis of CS were matched with those without a diagnosis for heritability analysis.

RESULTS

Of 158,624 fractures, 931 patients were diagnosed with CS. Incidence of CS was 0.59% (tibia 0.83%, femur 0.31%, upper extremity 0.27%). Male sex (78.1% vs. 46.4%; p < 0.001; RR = 3.24), younger age at fracture (38.8 vs. 48.0 years; p < 0.001; RR = 0.74), Medicaid enrollment (13.2% vs. 9.3%; p < 0.001; RR = 1.58), and smoking (41.1% vs. 31.1%; p < 0.001; RR 1.67) were significant risk factors for CS. CS was associated with mortality (RR 1.61, p < 0.001) at mean follow-up 8.9 years in the CS cohort. No significant heritable risk was found for diagnosis of CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Without isolating high-risk fractures, rates of CS are lower than previously reported in the literature. Male sex, younger age, smoking, and Medicaid enrollment were independent risk factors for CS. CS increased mortality risk at long-term follow-up. No heritable risk was found for CS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Trauma recidivism is reduced with engagement in psychosocial programming following orthopaedic trauma

INTRODUCTION

Recidivism is common following injury. Interventions to enhance patient engagement may reduce trauma recidivism. Education, counseling, peer mentorship, and other resources are known as Trauma Recovery Services (TRS). The authors hypothesized that TRS use would reduce trauma recidivism.

METHODS

Over five years at a level 1 trauma center, 954 adults treated operatively for pelvic, spine, and femoral fractures were reviewed. Recidivism was defined as return to trauma center for new injury within 30-months. All patients were offered TRS. Multivariate logistic regression statistical analysis was used to identify predictors of recidivism.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-seven of all patients (42 %) utilized TRS, including educational materials (n = 293), peer visits (n = 360), coaching (n = 284), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening (n = 74), and other services. Within the entire sample, 136 patients (14 %) returned to the emergency department for an unrelated trauma event after mean 21 months. 13 % of TRS users became recidivists. Overall, 49 % of recidivists had history of pre-existing mental illness. High rates of TRS engagement between recidivists and non-recidivists were seen (75 %); however, non-recidivists were more likely to use multiple types of recovery services (49 % vs 34 %, p = 0.002), and were more likely to engage with trauma peer mentors (former trauma survivors) more than once (91 % vs 81 %, p = 0.03). After multivariable analysis, patients using multiple different recovery services had a lower risk of recidivism (p = 0.04, OR 0.42, 95 % CI [0.19-0.96]).

CONCLUSIONS

Multifaceted engagement with recovery programming is associated with less recidivism following trauma. Future study of resultant reductions in healthcare costs are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II; Prognostic.

Familial Analysis of Nonunion in a Genealogic Population Database Demonstrates No Evidence of Heritable Risk

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is evidence of heritable risk for nonunion using a large, state-wide population database.

DESIGN

Database.

SETTING

Level 1 Trauma Center.

POPULATION

All Utah residents from 1996 to 2021 who sustained a long bone fracture and their family members were included.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was nonunion and the prevalence of nonunion among the patients' first-, second-, and third-degree relatives. The secondary objective was to identify demographic, injury, and socioeconomic risk factors associated with nonunion.

RESULTS

In total, 150,263 fractures and 6577 nonunions (4.4%) were identified. This was highly refined to a 1:3 matched cohort of 4667 nonunions of 13,981 fractures for familial clustering analysis. Cox proportional hazards did not demonstrate excessive risk of nonunion among first- ( P = 0.863), second- ( P = 0.509), and third-degree relatives ( P = 0.252). Further analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated that male sex (relative risk [RR] = 1.15; P < 0.001), Medicaid enrollment (RR = 2.64; P < 0.001), open fracture (RR = 2.53; P < 0.001), age group 41-60 years (RR = 1.43; P < 0.001), and a history of obesity (RR = 1.20; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate no evidence of heritable risk for nonunion. Independent risk factors for nonunion were male sex, Medicaid enrollment, open fracture, middle age, and a history of obesity. Although it is important to identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, these results continue to support that the risk of nonunion is multifactorial, relating to injury characteristics, operative techniques, and patient-specific risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Recidivism after orthopaedic trauma has diminished over time

PURPOSE

The purpose was to analyze our trauma population during two periods to assess for predictors of recidivism.

METHODS

Prior (2007-2011, n = 879) and recent (2014-2019, n = 954) orthopaedic trauma patients were reviewed. Recidivists were those returning with an unrelated injury. Recidivism rates were compared, and factors associated with recidivism were identified.

RESULTS

Recidivism decreased: 18.7% to 14.3% (p = 0.01). Mean age and sex of the two cohorts were not different. Recent recidivists were more likely to sustain gunshot wound (GSW) injuries (22.1% vs 18.9%, p = 0.09), and mental illness was more common (56.6% vs 28.1%, p < 0.0001). The recent recidivist population was less often married (12.9% vs 23.8%, p = 0.03), and both recidivist groups were often underinsured (Medicaid or uninsured: (60.6% vs 67.0%)).

CONCLUSION

Recidivism diminished, although more GSW and mental illness were seen. Recidivists are likely to be underinsured. The changing profile of recidivists may be attributed to socioeconomic trends and new programs to improve outcomes after trauma.

Concomitant Mental Illnesses Diagnoses and Likelihood of Trauma Recidivism

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of death among persons aged 1-44 years. Trauma recidivism occurs when an individual experiences more than one significant injury in a 5-year period. The relationship between a trauma recidivist's perception of recurrent injury has been unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the association between select sociodemographic and clinical variables, threat orientation, and the perceived likelihood of recurrent injury of individuals recently experiencing a significant injury.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with Level II trauma inpatients ( n = 84) in Southern California from October 2021 to January 2022. Participants completed surveys prior to discharge. Clinical variables were extracted from the electronic health record.

RESULTS

The trauma recidivism rate was 31%. Mental illness and length of hospital stay were associated with trauma recidivism. In individuals with two or more mental illness diagnoses, the odds of trauma recidivism were approximately 6.5 times higher than in those with no mental illness (odds ratio = 6.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.7-24.6).

CONCLUSION

Trauma is a preventable health care concern with timely recognition of risk factors and intervention. This study confirms mental illness as a predominant factor in injury and should be addressed in clinical practice. This study builds upon previous research and emphasizes the necessity of targeting injury prevention and education in the mentally ill. Trauma providers seeking to practice with an upstream mentality have a responsibility in screening patients for mental illness to help prevent further injury and death.

Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in the United States: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Health inequities have been shown to have negative effects on patient care and the healthcare system. It is important for orthopaedic trauma surgeons and researchers to understand the extent to which patients are affected by these inequities.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review as outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We searched PubMed and Ovid Embase for articles relating to orthopaedic trauma surgery and health inequities.

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria were applied, our final sample consisted of 52 studies. The most frequently evaluated inequities were sex (43 of 52 [82.7]), race/ethnicity (23 of 52 [44.2]), and income status (17 of 52 [32.7]). The least frequently evaluated inequities were lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identity (0 of 52 [0.0]) and occupational status (8 of 52 [15.4]). Other inequities evaluated included rural/underresourced (11 of 52 [21.1]) and educational level (10 of 52 [19.2]). No trend was observed when examining inequities reported by year.

CONCLUSION

Health inequities exist in orthopaedic trauma literature. Our study highlights multiple inequities in the field that need further investigation. Understanding current inequities and how to best mitigate them could improve patient care and outcomes in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Trauma recidivism is pervasive and is associated with mental and social health opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Recidivism after orthopedic trauma results in greater morbidity and costs. Prior studies explored the effects of social and medical factors affecting the frequency of return to the hospital with new, unrelated injury. Identification of mental, social and other risk factors for trauma recidivism may provide opportunities for mitigation. The purposes of this study are to determine the rates of subsequent, unrelated injury noted among orthopedic trauma patients at a large urban trauma center and to evaluate what patient and injury features are associated with greater rates of trauma recidivism. We hypothesize higher rates of new injuries will be related to ballistic trauma and other forms of assault, alcohol and recreational drug use, unemployment, and unmarried status among our trauma patients.

METHODS

A series of 954 skeletally mature patients at a level 1 trauma center over a 5 year period were included in the study. All were treated operatively for thoracolumbar, pelvic ring, acetabulum, and/or proximal or shaft femoral fractures from a high energy mechanism. Retrospective review of demographic, injury, medical, and social factors, and subsequent care was performed. Trauma recidivism was defined as returning to the emergency department for treatment of any new injury. A backward stepwise logistic regression statistical analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recidivism.

RESULTS

Mean age of all patients was 41.2 years, and 73.2% were male. 136 patients (14.3%) returned with a new injury within a mean of 21 months. These trauma recidivists were more likely to sustain a GSW (22.1% vs 11.4%, p = 0.001). They had higher rates of substance use, including tobacco (57.4% vs 41.8%, p = 0.001) and recreational drugs (50.7% vs 34.4%, p = 0.001), and were less likely to be married (10% vs 25.9%, p<0.001). Mental illness was pervasive, noted in 56.6% of patients with new injury (vs 32.8%, p<0.001). Medicaid insurance was most common in the trauma recidivist population (58.1% vs 35.0%, p = 0.001), and 12.5% were uninsured. Completing high school or more education was protective (93% non-recidivist (vs 79%, p = 0.001). Sixty-nine patients (50.7%) were repeat trauma recidivists within the study period. Independent predictors of new injury included recreational drug use (OR 1.64, p = 0.05) and history of assault due to GSW or other means (OR 1.67, p = 0.05). History of pre-existing mental illness represented the greatest risk factor for trauma recidivism (OR 2.55, p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

New injuries resulting in emergency department presentation after prior orthopedic trauma occurred in 14.3% and were associated with history of assault, lower education, Medicaid insurance, tobacco smoking and recreational drug use. Mental illness was the greatest risk factor. Over half of patients with these additional injuries were repeat trauma recidivists, returning for another new injury within less than 2 years. Awareness of risk factors may promote focused education and other interventions to mitigate this burden.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3 retrospective, prognostic.

Concurrent Mental Illness and Financial Barriers to Mental Health Care Among a Nationally Representative Sample of Orthopaedic Trauma Survivors

OBJECTIVES

To understand prevalence and factors associated with concurrent mental illness and financial barriers to mental health care after orthopaedic trauma.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Interview-based survey was conducted across representative sample of 30,000 US households.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

The study included 2,309 survey respondents reporting a fracture over the past 3 months, between 2004 and 2017.

INTERVENTION

Screening for financial barriers to mental health care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Prevalence and factors associated with concurrent mental illness and financial barriers to mental health care based on sociodemographic and injury characteristics were the main outcome measurements.

RESULTS

Of the 2309 orthopaedic trauma survivors included in our analysis, 203 patients [7.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4%-9.2%] were determined to experience severe mental illness, of whom 54 (25.3%, 95% CI: 18.0%-32.6%) and 86 (40.9%, 95% CI: 31.5%-50.2%) reported financial barriers to counseling and pharmacotherapy, respectively. Factors associated with concurrent severe mental illness and cost barriers to care were 45 to 64 years of age [adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 5.1, 95% CI: 1.7-15, P = 0.004], income below 200% of the Federal Poverty Threshold (AOR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.3, P = 0.012), and unemployment at the time of injury (AOR 3.9, 95% CI: 1.4-11, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one half of orthopaedic trauma survivors with severe mental illness face financial barriers to some form of mental health services. Younger, minority, and low socioeconomic status patients are most affected. These data suggest the presence of postdiagnosis disparities in mental health access that may be improved through direct provision and subsidization of integrated mental health support services for high-risk populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The economic impact of gunshot wounds on an urban level 1 trauma center

INTRODUCTION

Firearm-related injuries impact the healthcare system, taxpayers, and injured patients due to lost productivity and reduced quality of life. The goal was to quantify the economic costs related to hospitalization for gunshot wounds (GSWs) at a single urban level 1 trauma center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

941 patients over 27 months were treated for GSW. Elements related to hospitalization including length of stay, surgical procedures, medications and therapies, and subsequent readmission were identified, and costs were determined, inclusive of fixed and variable direct and indirect costs of facility care. Costs were classified based on body region: abdominal, chest, soft tissue, extremity or pelvic girdle, and head/neck/face.

RESULTS

Mean age was 30 years, with 94% male. Most patients (81%) were admitted, and 8% sustained fatal injuries. Overall, 12% were seen previously or subsequently for additional, unrelated GSWs. Mean costs per patient were: $66,780 for abdominal GSWs; $3,986 for chest; $3,509 for soft tissue; $19,875 for extremities; $64,533 for head or neck, and means of $25,249 for two regions and $26,638 for three regions. Over the prospective period, 941 individuals sustained GSWs (approximately 35 per month). 37% were to the extremities, 23% were within the skin/subcutaneous tissue, 7% to the abdomen, 7% to the chest, 6% to the head or neck, and 20% to two or more body regions. Total facility costs for these 941 GSWs was $18.9 million, or $698,960 per month. 55% of the patients had Medicaid, and 33% were uninsured, resulting in substantial uncompensated expenses for the trauma center.

CONCLUSION

Firearm-related injuries generate considerable expense. Our data underestimated cost, as professional services and indirect costs associated with lost economic productivity of patients and caregivers were excluded. No objective assessment of the disastrous personal and social impact was projected. Moving forward, interventions to prevent initial injury and recidivism in this high-risk population are crucial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Treating trauma more effectively: A review of psychosocial programming

IMPORTANCE

Traumatic events are the leading cause of life-altering disability in adults of working age. The management of patients with traumatic injury has substantially improved due to development of sophisticated trauma centers increasing survival after injury. Unlike the adoption of the trauma system framework, the same has not occurred with specialized trauma recovery services to include mental and social health needs. This literature review will discuss unique issues facing trauma survivors, some current recovery programs available, outcomes and benefits of these programs, and barriers that impair widespread incorporation.

OBSERVATIONS

Studies have shown that patients with traumatic injury experience reduction in quality of life and concurrent threats to mental health, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), alcohol use disorder, and recreational substance abuse. Patients with traumatic injury also have high recidivism rates, low pain management satisfaction, and poor engagement in care following injury. Screening efforts for PTSD, mental illness, and alcohol and substance abuse are more widely available interventions. Early coordinated efforts included dedicated multidisciplinary recovery teams. Recently, more methodical and organized programs, such as the Trauma Survivors Network, trauma collaborative care, Trauma Recovery Services, and Center of Trauma Survivorship, have been implemented.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The enrollment of patients with traumatic injury in novel programs to enhance recovery has led to heightened self-efficacy, better coping mechanisms, and increased use of mental health services. Additionally, trauma recovery services have been shown to reduce recidivism and have generated cost savings for hospital systems. While positive outcomes have been demonstrated, they are not consistently predictable. Barriers for widespread implementation include limitations of time, funding, and institutional support. This article describes models of successful programs initiated within some trauma centers, which may be duplicated to serve future trauma survivors.

Tobacco smoking is associated with more pain and worse functional outcomes after torsional ankle fracture

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of current and remote tobacco smoking on clinical and functional outcomes after torsional ankle fracture.

Methods:

Nine hundred thirty-five patients treated surgically for torsional ankle fracture over 9 years were reviewed. Tobacco smoking status at the time of injury was defined as current (48.3%), former (11.7%), and nonsmoker (40.0%). Complications, unplanned secondary procedures, pain medication use, and functional outcome scores, as measured by Foot Function Index and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) surveys.

Results:

Mean age was 44.8 years, with 50.3% male. More than 6 months following injury current smokers were more likely than former smokers and nonsmokers to report ankle pain (67.8% vs 45.8% vs 47.5%) and to use prescription pain medicines (23.0% vs 10.4% vs 6.3%), all P < .05. Multiple logistic regression found current tobacco use to be an independent predictor for prescription pain medication use, and worse scores for the Foot Function Index, SMFA Dysfunction, and SMFA Bothersome scores, all P < .05. Complications occurred in 15.5% of all patients, and 10.7% underwent unplanned secondary operations. Tobacco smoking was not associated with more complications or secondary procedures.

Conclusion:

Current smokers are more likely to use prescription pain medications several months after injury and have worse patient-reported functional outcome scores after surgical treatment of torsional ankle fractures than former smokers and nonsmokers.

Methamphetamine in Orthopaedics: Considerations of an At-Risk Population

»

Methamphetamine use by orthopaedic trauma patients has risen to epidemic proportions.

»

Perioperative methamphetamine use by orthopaedic trauma patients requires physicians to consider both medical and psychosocial factors during treatment.

»

Behavioral and psychosocial effects of methamphetamine use present barriers to care.

»

Patients who use methamphetamine face elevated rates of complications.

Evaluation of Injury Recidivism Using the Electronic Medical Record

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injuries remain one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Patients who survive traumatic injuries but return to the emergency department with repeat injuries are said to suffer from injury recidivism. Numerous studies have described trends in injury recidivism using trauma registry and survey data. To our knowledge, no prior study has leveraged electronic medical record (EMR) data to characterize injury recidivism. The EMR is potentially more comprehensive as it contains details of patients who visited the emergency department after injury but did not meet the criteria for inclusion in the trauma registry. Such injuries could be predictive of future recidivism. We therefore aimed to describe patterns of injury recidivism seen at a Level 1 trauma center using the EMR.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all injury-related encounters between January 2016 and December 2019. Manual review was conducted of all recidivistic encounters with < 11 months between encounters to ensure the recidivistic encounter was not a sequela of the index visit. A general estimating equation logistic regression adjusted for age, race, sex, and insurance payor, estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between injury mechanism and odds of recidivistic encounter.

RESULTS

A total of 20,566 index encounters was included during the study period. Of the 20,566 encounters, 7.6% (n = 1570) had a recidivistic encounter during the study period, half of which (n = 781) occurred within the first year of the index encounter. An over two-fold increased odds of recidivism was observed for blunt assault encounters (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.03-3.15) and unintentional falls (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.76-2.52). For both mechanisms, this increase was observed across the three years following the index encounter.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that patients with assault injuries have the highest odds of injury recidivism and assault-related recidivistic encounters. These results demonstrate the feasibility and utility of incorporating EMR data, and suggest that the development of targeted interventions focused on mitigating assault injuries, such as hospital-based violence intervention programs, should be considered in our region.

Downstream hospital system effects of a comprehensive trauma recovery services program

BACKGROUND

Trauma patients are often noted to have poor compliance but high recidivism and readmission rates. Participation in a trauma recovery services (TRS) program, which provides peer support and other psychosocial resources, may impact the trajectory of patient recovery by decreasing barriers to follow-up. We hypothesized that TRS participants would have greater downstream nonemergent use of our hospital system over the year following trauma, manifested by more positive encounters, fewer negative encounters, and lower emergency department (ED) charges.

METHODS

We studied trauma survivors (March 2017 to March 2018) offered TRS. Hospital encounters and charges 1 year from index admission were compared between patients who accepted and declined TRS. Positive encounters were defined as outpatient visits and planned admissions; negative encounters were defined as no shows, ED visits, and unplanned admissions. Charges were grouped as cumulative ED and non-ED charges (including outpatient and subsequent admission charges). Adjusted logistic and linear regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with positive/negative encounters and ED charges.

RESULTS

Of 511 identified patients (68% male; injury severity score, 14 [9-19]), 362 (71%) accepted TRS. Trauma recovery services patients were older, had higher injury severity, and longer index admission length of stay (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, TRS patients were more likely to have at least one positive encounter and were similarly likely to have negative encounters as patients who declined services. Total aggregate charges for this group was US $74 million, of which US $30 million occurred downstream of the index admission. Accepting TRS was associated with lower ED charges.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive TRS program including education, peer mentors, and a support network may provide value to the patient and the health care system by reducing subsequent care provided by the ED in the year after a trauma without affecting nonemergent care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Orthopaedic Care of the Transgender Patient

»

A transgender person is defined as one whose gender identity is incongruent with their biological sex assigned at birth. This highly marginalized population numbers over 1.4 million individuals in the U.S.; this prevalence skews more heavily toward younger generations and is expected to increase considerably in the future.

»

Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) has physiologic effects on numerous aspects of the patient's health that are pertinent to the orthopaedic surgeon, including bone health, fracture risk, and perioperative risks such as venous thromboembolism and infection.

»

Language and accurate pronoun usage toward transgender patients can have a profound effect on a patient's experience and on both objective and subjective outcomes.

»

Gaps in research concerning orthopaedic care of the transgender patient are substantial. Specific areas for further study include the effects of GAHT on fracture risk and healing, outcome disparities and care access across multiple subspecialties, and establishment of perioperative management guidelines.

Improvement in Outpatient Follow-up With a Postdischarge Phone Call Intervention

INTRODUCTION

Attending clinic appointments after injury is crucial for orthopaedic trauma patients to evaluate healing and to update recommendations. However, attendance at these appointments is inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a personalized phone call placed 3 to 5 days after hospital discharge on attendance at the first postdischarge outpatient clinic visit.

METHODS

This prospective study was done at an urban level 1 trauma center. One hundred fifty-nine patients were exposed to a reminder phone call, with 33% of patients being reached for a conversation and 28% receiving a voicemail reminder. Phone calls were made by a trained trauma recovery coach, and the main outcome measure was attendance at the first postdischarge clinic visit.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (54%) attended their scheduled appointments. Appointment adherence was more common among the group reached for a conversation (70% versus 51% for voicemail cohort and 34% for no contact group). Patients exposed to the Trauma Recovery Services (TRS) during their hospital stay attended appointments more often (91% versus 61%, P = 0.026). Age, sex, mechanism of injury, and distance from the hospital were not associated with specific follow-up appointment adherence. Insured status was associated with higher attendance rates (71% versus 46%, P = 0.0036). Other economic factors such as employment were also indicative of attendance (64% versus 48%, P = 0.05). Current tobacco use was associated with poor appointment attendance (30%) versus 56% for nonsmokers (P = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Patients reached by telephone after discharge had better rates of subsequent clinic attendance. Economic factors and substance use appear vital to postoperative clinic visit compliance. Patients with met psychosocial needs, as identified by individuals with satisfactory emotional support, and exposure to TRS had the highest rates of postdischarge appointment attendance.

National Estimates and Factors Influencing Trauma Recidivism in Children Leading to Hospital Readmission

INTRODUCTION

Trauma is the leading cause of mortality in children. Factors influencing recidivism after major trauma have not been well documented in children. The objective of this study is to determine the burden of pediatric trauma recidivism and to identify predisposing factors in the United States.

METHODS

The 2010-2015 National Readmissions Database was queried for pediatric patients (≤18 years) with a diagnosis of major traumatic injuries. Patients readmitted for major trauma were subsequently identified. Patients that did not survive their index-hospitalization were excluded. Information on mechanism, intent, nature and injury severity including Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Scores (ISS) was obtained. Multivariable-regression analyses were performed adjusting for demographic, hospital-level and injury characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 286,508 pediatric trauma records analyzed, trauma recidivists represented 2.9% of the total population. Recidivists had a higher proportion of severe (AIS ≥ 3) head injury (11.3%). Recidivists were more likely to have public-insurance (OR [95% CI]:1.30[1.25-1.37]), and belong to lower income families (OR [95% CI]:1.22[1.15-1.31]). Recidivism was more common amongst patients with penetrating injuries (OR [95% CI]:2.12[1.96-2.28]). The risk adjusted cost of readmission for trauma was $8401[95% CI: 6748-10,053] higher compared to the index hospitalization with a total increased cost of 11.5 million USD annually.

CONCLUSION

Although not common, recidivism after major trauma remains a significant public-health concern. This study gauges the previously unquantified burden of recidivism amongst children and identifies factors predisposing to recurrent trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III TYPE OF EVIDENCE: Case control study.

Factors Influencing Nonadherence to Recommended Postdischarge Follow-Up After Trauma

INTRODUCTION

Historically, trauma patients have low adherence to recommended outpatient follow-up plans, which is crucial for improved long-term clinical outcomes. We sought to identify characteristics associated with nonadherence to recommended outpatient follow-up visits.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective examination of inpatient trauma survivors admitted to a level 1 trauma center (March 2017-March 2018). Patients with known alternative follow-up were excluded. All outpatient visits within 1 y from the index admission were identified. The primary outcome was nonadherence, which was noted if a patient failed to follow-up for any specialty recommended in the discharge instructions. Factors for nonadherence studied included age, injury severity score, mechanism, length of stay, number of referrals made, and involvement with a Trauma Recovery Services program. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of498 patients were identified (69% men, median age 43 y [range, 26-58 y], median injury severity score 14 [range, 9-19]). Among them, 240 (47%) were nonadherent. The most common specialties recommended were orthopedic surgery (56% referred, 19% nonadherent), trauma (54% referred, 35% nonadherent), and neurosurgery (127 referred, 35% nonadherent). Lowest levels of follow-up were seen for nonsurgical referrals. In adjusted analysis, a higher number of referrals made (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-3.05) and older age (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) were associated with nonadherence. Trauma Recovery Service participants and penetrating trauma patients were more likely to be adherent (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The largest contributor to nonadherence was the number of referrals made; patients who were referred to multiple specialists were more likely to be nonadherent. Peer support services may lower barriers to follow-up.

Patient Satisfaction Is Improved With Exposure to Trauma Recovery Services

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of Trauma Recovery Services (TRS), a program facilitating engagement and recovery on satisfaction after orthopaedic trauma.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-four patients with surgically managed extremity fractures were prospectively surveyed. Satisfaction was assessed after 12 months using a 13-question telephone survey, rated on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (with five being excellent). TRS resource utilization during and after hospitalization was recorded. Eighty-eight patients (30%) used TRS.

RESULTS

Overall satisfaction was high with a mean score of 4.32. Although no differences were observed between the control group and patients with TRS utilization in age, sex, race, insurance, smoking history, or employment status, TRS patients sustained more high-energy mechanisms (81% versus 56%) and had more associated psychiatric illness (33% versus 17%), both P < 0.01. Multivariable regression indicated general exposure to TRS to be an independent predictor of higher overall care ratings (B = 1.31; P = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

Utilization of TRS was the greatest predictor of better overall care ratings. This study builds on existing evidence demonstrating the positive impact of Trauma Survivor Network programming. We conclude that a hospital-wide program supporting patient education and engagement can effectively increase patient satisfaction after traumatic injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II.

Are we missing the mark? Relationships of psychosocial issues to outcomes after injury: A review of OTA annual meeting presentations

OBJECTIVES

To observe the availability of information about social, emotional, and psychological factors in abstracts presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) annual meeting.

DATA SOURCE

OTA website (https://ota.org/education/meetings-and-courses/meeting-archive/).

STUDY SELECTION

All abstracts selected for paper or poster presentation at the 2016 through 2018 OTA annual meetings, as published in the final program. Studies were included if they sought to measure mental illness, substance use or abuse, pain, or other psychosocial issues. If studies utilized 1 or more patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), they were also included.

DATA EXTRACTION

For each abstract meeting inclusion criterion, studies were assessed for interventions intended to improve outcomes in any of the listed psychosocial domains.

DATA SYNTHESIS/RESULTS

Nine hundred forty-two abstracts were evaluated over a 3-year period. Of these, 294 (31.2%) met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five abstracts (8.5% of 294) reported mental illness, with depression (n = 14), anxiety (n = 9), and posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 5) being the most common. Eighty-eight abstracts (29.9% of 294) reported substance-use of tobacco, alcohol, narcotics, and/or recreational drugs. Tobacco-use was most prevalent (n = 59), followed by opioid-use (n = 31). Ten abstracts reported substance abuse. Pain was measured in 95 abstracts, and 203 abstracts utilized PROMs. Thirty-five abstracts found that these psychosocial elements significantly impacted outcomes or complications. Many abstracts did not assess the influence of these factors on clinical outcomes (n = 99). Sixteen studies described an intervention aimed at mitigating these features.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illustrates limited attention to the impact of psychological, social, and environmental factors on outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. Substance-abuse problems and mental health concerns are not only predictors of poor clinical and PROMs of pain and quality of life after injury, but have also been implicated in subsequent recidivism. Only 3% of 942 abstracts observed mental health and 1% reported substance-abuse. Moving forward, greater understanding of psychosocial issues may enhance interventions to impact long-term outcomes.

Implementing psychosocial programming at a level 1 trauma center: results from a 5-year period

BACKGROUND

The primary goal of the present study is to describe the psychosocial support services provided at our institution and the evolution of such programming through time. This study will also report the demographics and injury patterns of patients using available resources.

METHODS

Trauma Recovery Services (TRS) is a social and psychological support program that provides services and resources to patients and families admitted to our hospital. It includes a number of different services such as emotional coaching from licensed counselors, educational materials, peer mentorship from trauma survivors, monthly support groups, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening and programming for victims of crime. Patients using services were prospectively recorded by hired staff, volunteers and students who engaged in distributing programming. Demographics and injury characteristics were retrospectively gathered from patient's medical records.

RESULTS

From May of 2013 through December 2018, a total of 4977 discrete patients used TRS at an urban level 1 trauma center. During the study period, 31.4% of the 15 640 admitted adult trauma patients were exposed to TRS and this increased from 7.2% in 2013 to 60.1% in 2018. During the period of 5.5 years, 3317 patients had 'direct contact' (coaching and/or educational materials) and 1827 patients had at least one peer visit. The average number of peer visits was 2.7 per patient (range: 2-15). Of the 114 patients who attended support groups over 4 years, 55 (48%) attended more than one session, with an average of 3.9 visits (range: 2-10) per patient. After the establishment of PTSD screening and Victims of Crime Advocacy and Recovery Program (VOCARP) services in 2017, a total of 482 patients were screened for PTSD and 974 patients used VOCARP resources during the period of 2 years, with substantial growth from 2017 to 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital-provided resources aimed at educating patients, expanding support networks and bolstering resiliency were popular at our institution, with nearly 5000 discrete patients accessing services during a period of 5.5 years. Moving forward, greater investigation of program usage, development, and efficacy is necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II therapeutic.

Implementing recovery resources in trauma care: impact and implications

Objectives:

To identify resources that patients perceive as helpful to their recovery and to characterize the impact of the Trauma Survivor Network (TSN), a program committed to enhancing recovery through education and engagement.

Design:

Prospective cohort study.

Setting:

Level 1 trauma center.

Patients/Participants:

Four hundred eighty-five patients with musculoskeletal injuries. Two hundred eleven were exposed to TSN resources (Group 1). One hundred thirty-five patients were treated during the same period with no exposure (Group 2, control). One hundred thirty-nine patients were treated 1 to 3 months prior to TSN implementation (Group 3, control).

Intervention:

TSN resources including educational materials, family classes, peer survivor visits, coaching, online services, and support groups.

Main outcome measure:

A survey to assess hospital experience and perceptions about recovery.

Results:

On a Likert scale from 0 to 5, patients were highly satisfied (mean 4.24), with no differences based on TSN exposure. Patients exposed to TSN programming reported greater perceived likelihood of recovery: mean 3.73 vs 3.41 vs 3.38, Group 1 vs Group 2 vs Group 3 (P = .05) and regarding return to daily activities: 3.69 vs 3.49 vs 3.10, P = .003. Fifty-three percent of Group 1 patients exposed to TSN programming utilized peer relationships and 42% read the educational materials provided. Support groups were also popular, with 26% of patients attending at least 1 session. Patients who recalled utilization of TSN services were overall highly satisfied with these services, mean 4.42.

Conclusion:

Patients were overall highly satisfied with their hospital stay, with those exposed to TSN services reporting greater perceived likelihood of recovery and return to daily activities. Development of nontraditional services, including peer visitation and support groups, appears to enhance expectations about recovery.

The role of sociodemographics in the occurrence of orthopaedic trauma

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine the effects of sociodemographic factors on the occurrence of orthopaedic injuries in an adult population presenting to a level 1 trauma center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received orthopaedic trauma care at a level 1 academic trauma center.

RESULTS

20,919 orthopaedic trauma injury cases were treated at an academic level 1 trauma center between 01 January 1993 and 27 August 2017. Following application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 14,654 patients were retrieved for analysis. Out of 14,654 patients, 4602 (31.4%) belonged to low socioeconomic status (SES), 4961 (32.0%) to middle SES and 5361 (36.6%) to high SES. Following adjustment for age, sex, race, insurance status and injury severity score (ISS), patients belonging to middle SES vs. low SES (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.63-0.94]; p = 0.009) or high SES vs. low SES (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.62-0.95]; p = 0.016) had lower odds of receiving a penetrating injury as compared to a blunt injury.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study indicate that a link exists between sociodemographic factors and the occurrence of orthopaedic injuries presenting to a level 1 trauma center. The most common cause of injury varied within age groups, by sex, and within the different socioeconomic groups.

Mental illness is associated with more pain and worse functional outcomes after ankle fracture

Objectives

To assess clinical and functional outcomes after ankle fracture in patients with preexisting mental illness.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Level 1 trauma center.

Patients/Participants

One thousand three hundred seventy-eight adult patients treated for ankle fractures; 228 (17%) had preexisting mental illness.

Intervention

Open reduction internal fixation.

Main outcome measure

Rates of complications and reoperations. Functional outcomes were assessed via Foot Function Index (n = 530) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (n = 530).

Results

Depression was the most common mental illness (63%), followed by anxiety (23%). Mental illness was associated with older age, female sex, and preexisting medical comorbidities, including diabetes and obesity. Mental illness was not associated with specific fracture patterns or open injury. Complications occurred no more often in patients with mental illness, but secondary operations (13% vs 7%) were more likely, particularly implant removals (8% vs 4%), both P < .05. Functional outcomes were worse in mentally ill patients as measured by the Foot Function Index (39 vs 30, P = .006) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Mobility: 45 vs 35, Bothersome: 35 vs 26 and Dysfunction: 35 vs 26, all P < .01.

Conclusion

Secondary operations were nearly 50% more frequent in patients with mental illness, and functional outcome scores were significantly worse, suggesting that mental illness, unrelated to injury and treatment parameters, has major influence on outcomes. In the future, strategies to identify and treat mental illness prior to and after treatment could improve functional outcomes following ankle fracture.

Burn recidivism: a 10-year retrospective study characterizing patients with repeated burn injuries at a large tertiary referral burn center in the United States

Background

Psychiatric and substance use disorders are common among trauma and burn patients and are known risk factors for repeat episodes of trauma, known as trauma recidivism. The epidemiology of burn recidivism, specifically, has not been described. This study aimed to characterize cases of burn recidivism at a large US tertiary care burn center and compare burn recidivists (RCs) with non-recidivists (NRCs).

Methods

A 10-year retrospective descriptive cohort study of adult burn patients admitted to the North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center was conducted using data from an electronic burn registry and the medical record. Continuous variables were reported using medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Chi-square and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare demographic, burn, and hospitalization characteristics between NRCs and RCs.

Results

A total of 7134 burn patients were admitted, among which 51 (0.7%) were RCs and accounted for 129 (1.8%) admissions. Of the 51 RCs, 37 had two burn injuries each, totaling 74 admissions as a group, while the remaining 14 RCs had between three and eight burn injuries each, totaling 55 admissions as a group. Compared to NRCs, RCs were younger (median age 36 years vs. 42 years, p = 0.02) and more likely to be white (75% vs. 60%, p = 0.03), uninsured (45% vs. 30%, p = 0.02), have chemical burns (16% vs. 5%, p <  0.0001), and have burns that were ≤ 10% total body surface area (89% vs. 76%, p = 0.001). The mortality rate for RCs vs. NRCs did not differ (0% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.41). Psychiatric and substance use disorders were approximately five times greater among RCs compared to NRCs (75% vs. 15%, p <  0.001). Median total hospital charges per patient were nearly three times higher for RCs vs. NRCs ($85,736 vs. $32,023, p <  0.0001).

Conclusions

Distinct from trauma recidivism, burn recidivism is not associated with more severe injury or increased mortality. Similar to trauma recidivists, but to a greater extent, burn RCs have high rates of comorbid psychiatric and medical conditions that contribute to increased health care utilization and costs. Studies involving larger samples from multiple centers can further clarify whether these findings are generalizable to national burn and trauma populations.

Perioperative Management of the Orthopaedic Patient and Alcohol Use, Abuse, and Withdrawal

Alcohol is one of most commonly abused substances in the United States, and it has contributed to a growing epidemic of medical ailments, including cirrhosis, neurologic and psychosocial disorders, impairment to fertility, and cancer. Moreover, acute and chronic alcohol use represent a significant risk factor for orthopaedic injury and postoperative complications. Yet, relatively little is known about the clinical implications of alcohol abuse in common orthopaedic procedures. Acute withdrawal from alcohol is potentially fatal, particularly in the orthopaedic inpatient whose abstinence is mandated by the hospital setting. The aim of this review is to address the screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic tools available to appropriately manage acute alcohol withdrawal in the orthopaedic inpatient. The influence of chronic alcohol consumption on bone metabolism, fracture healing, and surgical fixation will also be reviewed because this information may guide surgical decision making.

Psychiatric Illness Is Common in Elderly Fracture Patients

OBJECTIVES

To (1) describe the prevalence of psychiatric illness in fracture patients ≥70 years of age and (2) investigate the association between psychiatric illness and complications requiring unplanned readmission in elderly patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One thousand one hundred eighty-six patients ≥70 years of age with surgically treated fractures and ≥1-month follow-up treated from 2012 to 2017.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Complication requiring unplanned readmission.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of patients ≥70 years of age have psychiatric comorbidities, and of those, 34% had >1 diagnosis. There was a higher rate of readmission among patients with psychiatric diagnosis compared with those without psychiatric diagnosis (35% vs. 21%, P < 0.001). There was a higher prevalence of psychiatric illness among patients 70 years of age or older compared with patients less than 70 years of age (44% vs. 39%, P = 0.007). Multivariate regression analysis controlling for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, dementia, delirium during admission, tobacco use, substance abuse, Injury Severity Score, fracture location, number of procedures, and number of fractures demonstrated an independent association between psychiatric illness and unplanned readmission (adjusted OR 1.54, 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.07, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half of the elderly patients in the present cohort have psychiatric comorbidities. Furthermore, psychiatric illness is an independent predictor of unplanned readmission, which may have substantial consequences for recovery and cost of care. This emphasizes the need for more attention to these issues in geriatric patient populations and the need to identify means to influence the downstream consequences of these comorbidities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comorbid tobacco and other substance use and symptoms of anxiety and depression among hospitalised orthopaedic trauma patients

BACKGROUND

No study has examined the prevalence of tobacco, other substance use, and symptoms of anxiety and depression, and rates of comorbidities among the orthopaedic trauma population, despite the impact they have on recovery from surgery. This study aims to 1) describe the rates of symptoms and substance use; 2) compare rates of symptoms and substance use among smokers versus non-smokers; and 3) examine the relationship between symptoms and substance use with smoking status.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of orthopaedic trauma patients was conducted in two Australian public hospitals. Demographic characteristics, smoking status, alcohol consumption, recent cannabis use, and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were examined. Differences between current and non-smokers were compared using Pearson Chi² tests. Multivariate logistic regression explored variables related to tobacco smoking.

RESULTS

Eight hundred nineteen patients participated. Over one-fifth (21.8%) identified as a current smoker, half (51.8%) reported consuming alcohol at hazardous levels in the last 12 months, and about 10% stated that they had used cannabis in the last 30 days (9.7%), or experienced symptoms of either anxiety (12.4%), or depression (12.9%) in the last two weeks. Over one-fifth of current tobacco smokers (21.8%) reported drinking heavily in the last 12 months and using cannabis recently. Males, with a lower educational attainment, who were unmarried, had used cannabis recently, and report drinking heavily were more likely to be current smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

Health behaviour interventions addressing comorbidities are warranted among the orthopaedic trauma population given the high rate of comorbidity and impact these may have on recovery.

Smoking, Quitting, and the Provision of Smoking Cessation Support: A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates orthopaedic trauma patients smoking cessation history, intentions to quit, receipt of smoking cessation care during hospital admission, and patient-related factors associated with receipt of smoking cessation care.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey of orthopaedic trauma patients was conducted in 2 public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Prevalence of smoking and associated variables were described. Logistic regressions were used to examine whether patient characteristics were associated with receipt of smoking cessation care.

RESULTS

Eight hundred nineteen patients (response rate 73%) participated. More than 1 in 5 patients (21.8%) were current smokers (n = 175). Of the current smokers, more than half (55.3%) indicated making a quit attempt in the last 12 months and the majority (77.6%) were interested in quitting. More than a third of smokers (37.4%) were not advised to quit; 44.3% did not receive any form of nicotine replacement therapy; and 24.1% reported that they did not receive any of these 3 forms of smoking cessation care during their admission. Provision of care was not related to patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of smoking among the sample was high. Respondents were interested in quitting; however, the provision of care during admission was low. Smoking cessation interventions need to be developed to increase the provision of care and to promote quit attempts in this Australian population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.