The University of Colorado Virtual Physical Examination for Spine Surgeons: A Preliminary Study

Virtual physical examination in teleconsultation: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The conduct of virtual physical examination has provided significant information for the diagnosis during a teleconsultation session, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, where in-person physical examinations have been greatly compromised.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence concerning virtual physical examination (VPE) in all healthcare settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. The review focuses on types of VPE, technological and non-technological approaches, patient and clinician experiences, as well as barriers and facilitators of VPE.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted across three databases, namely MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. Only studies in the English language with primary research data collected from December 2019 to January 2023 were included. A narrative analysis, highlighting patients' and clinicians' experiences, was conducted on the included studies. This scoping review was reported using The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 25 articles meeting eligibility criteria were identified. Three major types of VPE included were musculoskeletal, head and neck, and chest exams. Sixteen studies involved specific technological aids, while three studies involved non-technological aids. Patients found VPE helped them to better assess their disease conditions, or aided their clinicians' understanding of their conditions. Clinicians also reported that VPE had provided enough clinically relevant information for decision-making in 2 neurological evaluations. Barriers to conducting VPE included technological challenges, efficacy concerns, confidence level of assistants, as well as patient health conditions, health literacy, safety, and privacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients found virtual physical examination (VPE) helpful in understanding their own conditions, and clinicians found it useful for better assessing patient's conditions. From the clinicians' point of view, VPE provided sufficient clinically relevant information for decision-making in neurological evaluations. Major barriers identified for VPE included technological issues, patient's health conditions, and their health literacy.

A Systematic Review of Outpatient Telemedicine Use in Neurosurgery Since the Start of Coronavirus Disease 2019

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has sparked interest in telemedicine, resulting in an increase in neurosurgical publications focused on it. We summarize this new literature to evaluate telemedicine applications to neurosurgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines by searching PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for journal articles published after January 1, 2020. All journal articles that included data after the start of COVID-19 and evaluated any aspect of telemedicine relevant to outpatient neurosurgical visits were included. The premise and key findings of each included study were extracted, as well as patient and provider satisfaction with and preference for telemedicine.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Four studies proposed and evaluated a remote neurologic examination. Two studies reported similar postvisit outcomes between remote and in-person visits. Twenty-four studies reported a combination of patient and provider opinions toward telemedicine. Of 9834 patients and 116 providers, 82.4% and 65.2% were satisfied overall with telemedicine, respectively. Of 3526 patients and 168 providers, 57.0% and 66.5% preferred telemedicine to in-person visits, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, most patients and providers have a high opinion of telemedicine for outpatient visits, and increasing evidence suggests that remote visits yield favorable clinical outcomes. The high rates of patient and provider satisfaction and preference may be considered for further adoption of remote neurosurgical visits beyond the COVID-19 era.