Corneal Infiltrates After Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy and LASIK

Atypical microbial keratitis

Atypical microbial keratitis refers to corneal infections caused by micro-organisms not commonly encountered in clinical practice. Unlike infections caused by common bacteria, cases of atypical microbial keratitis are often associated with worse clinical outcomes and visual prognosis. This is due to the challenges in the identification of causative organisms with standard diagnostic techniques, resulting in delays in the initiation of appropriate therapies. Furthermore, due to the comparatively lower incidence of atypical microbial keratitis, there is limited literature on effective management strategies for some of these difficult to manage corneal infections. This review highlights the current management and available evidence of atypical microbial keratitis, focusing on atypical mycobacteria keratitis, nocardia keratitis, achromobacter keratitis, and pythium keratitis. It will also describe the management of two uncommonly encountered conditions, infectious crystalline keratopathy and post-refractive infectious keratitis. This review can be used as a guide for clinicians managing patients with such challenging corneal infections.

Post photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) infectious keratitis; six-year experience of a tertiary eye hospital

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

As an essential development in the new century, surface ablation procedures have attracted increasing attention. There exists a concern regarding the risk of infectious keratitis. Hence, we aimed to investigate the rate and predisposing factors of infectious keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

SUBJECTS/METHODS

This retrospective study was designed in two phases. First, the rate of post-PRK keratitis of Farabi Eye Hospital was investigated. In other words, the targeted population was the patients who developed keratitis after performing procedure at Farabi Eye Hospital. In the second phase, all the patients with the diagnosis of post-PRK keratitis were studied regardless of the centre where surgery was performed. Patients with the diagnosis of infectious keratitis between 2014 and 2020 were enrolled and following information was analyzed: demographics, presentation time after surgery, perioperative medications, culture results, risk factors, medical treatment, complications, and final visual acuity.

RESULTS

The total number of PRK procedures in our centre was 24,986 (13,253 patients), in which 6 eyes of 5 patients developed keratitis. Beside these 5 patients, 24 referred patients (24 eyes) from the other centres were enrolled. Finally, a total number of 29 patients (30 eyes) were included. Our analysis revealed that manipulation of contact lens, dry eye, and blepharitis were the essential predisposing factors for keratitis development.

CONCLUSION

The overall post-PRK keratitis occurrence rate of our study was 0.02%. Our observation highlighted the importance of preoperative examination and treatment of the lids and dry eye disease.

The Prevalence of Infectious Keratitis after Keratorefractive Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

BACKGROUND

The keratorefractive surgeries (KRS) are one of the most common ocular surgeries. One of the dangerous complications of these surgeries is infectious keratitis (IK), which is the second cause of blindness after cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of IK after KRS in different parts of the world.

METHODS

In order to obtain relevant studies, all national and international databases including IranMedex, SID, Magiran, IranDoc, Medlib, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched using standard keywords.

RESULTS

IK prevalence after KRS was 0.000496% (0.000145% for the left eye and 0.000149% for the right eye). IK prevalence after KRS in the United States, Europe, and Asia was 0.000667%, 0.000473%, and 0.000045%, respectively, in all of which the common microorganisms were Staphylococci. Meta-regression showed no significant association between IK after KRS and either sample size or publication year of the studies. IK prevalence after KRS in the right eye was more than that in the left one. Also, the probability of IK incidence after LASIK surgery was more than PRK and LASEK. In the evaluation of continents, IK after KRS in the United States was more frequent compared with Europe and Asia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided data as to the overall prevalence of IK following KRS and its variations according to the types of eye, surgery, pathogenic microorganism, and geographical location.

Risk for microbial keratitis: Comparative metaanalysis of contact lens wearers and post-laser in situ keratomileusis patients

PURPOSE

To compare the risk for microbial keratitis in contact lens wearers stratified by wear schedule with the risk after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Hamilton Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

DESIGN

Comparative metaanalysis and literature review.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed in the PubMed database between December 2014 and July 2015. This was followed by a metaanalysis using a mixed-effects modeling approach.

RESULTS

After 1 year of daily soft contact lens wear, there were fewer microbial keratitis cases than after LASIK, or approximately 2 cases fewer cases per 10 000 (P = .0609). If LASIK were assumed to have essentially a 1-time risk for microbial keratitis, 5 years of extrapolation would yield 11 more cases per 10 000 with daily soft contact lens wear than with LASIK, or approximately 3 times as many cases (P < .0001). The extended use of soft contact lenses led to 12 more cases at 1 year than LASIK, or approximately 3 times as many cases (P < .0001), and 81 more cases at 5 years (P < .0001). When incorporating an estimated 10% retreatment rate for LASIK, these results changed very little.

CONCLUSIONS

Microbial keratitis is a relatively rare complication associated with contact lens use and LASIK postoperatively. The risk for microbial keratitis was similar between patients using contact lenses for 1 year compared with LASIK. Over time, the risk for microbial keratitis was higher for contact lens use than for LASIK, specifically with extended-wear lenses.

Incidence of corneal infections after laser in situ keratomileusis and surface ablation when moxifloxacin and tobramycin are used as postoperative treatment

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence, culture results, and visual outcomes of infectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and surface ablation when topical moxifloxacin was added to postoperative prophylaxis with tobramycin.

SETTING

Clínica Baviera, Instituto Oftalmológico Europeo, Bilbao, Spain.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series review.

METHODS

The medical records of 55 255 patients (108 014 eyes) who had LASIK and surface ablation were reviewed to identify cases of infectious keratitis. The incidence, risk factors, clinical course, days to diagnosis, treatment, and final visual outcomes were recorded. These data were compared with previously published data of 221 437 eyes that received postoperative tobramycin alone.

RESULTS

Post-LASIK infectious keratitis was diagnosed in 10 eyes (9 patients) and post-surface ablation infectious keratitis in 11 eyes (10 patients). The onset of infection was early in 40.00% of cases after LASIK and in 36.36% after surface ablation. Cultures were positive in 2 cases after surface ablation. Immediate flap lifting and irrigation with antibiotics were performed in all eyes after LASIK. The final corrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 7 cases after LASIK (70.00%) and 7 cases after surface ablation (63.64%) and 20/40 or better in all cases after LASIK or surface ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of infectious keratitis decreased from 0.025% to 0.011% (P < .001) per procedure after LASIK and from 0.200% to 0.066% (P < .001) after surface ablation. Infectious keratitis was less frequent after LASIK than after surface ablation. The frequency of infection, mainly early-onset infection, was lower when the postoperative treatment was tobramycin and moxifloxacin rather than tobramycin alone.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Post-laser in situ keratomileusis interface fungal keratitis

PURPOSE

To report outcomes of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) interface filamentous fungal keratitis.

METHODS

This retrospective interventional case series included 6 eyes of 5 patients with microbiologically proven post-LASIK interface fungal keratitis from August 2008 to August 2013. Patients presenting with concurrent bacterial/viral keratitis, systemic illness, prior ocular pathology, or those without a minimum follow-up of 3 months were excluded. Every case underwent microbiological scrapings from residual bed and undersurface of the flap after flap lift at presentation followed by voriconazole interface wash. Flap amputation was performed when required. The outcome measure was complete resolution of infection.

RESULTS

The mean age was 24 ± 3.1 years. The male:female ratio was 4:1. The mean interval between LASIK and symptom onset was 4.16 ± 2 days; and the mean interval between symptom onset and patient referral was 3.16 ± 1.16 days. Interface scrapings showed filamentous fungal filaments in KOH wet mount. The culture grew Aspergillus in case 1 and case 5. Infiltrated LASIK flap needed to be amputated in 4 eyes of 3 patients. Voriconazole wash (100 μg/mL) of the stromal bed was performed in all cases. A positive response to therapy with resolution of infection was seen in all cases at a mean of 6.5 ± 4.6 days. No intraoperative or postoperative complications after interface scraping or voriconazole wash were observed. The final best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to 20/80 at a mean follow-up of 9.1 ± 6.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-LASIK interface fungal filamentous keratitis can present early and gives good outcomes with early microbiological diagnosis and appropriate management. Voriconazole is an efficient and probably safe adjunct in the armamentarium of corneal surgeons to treat such cases.

Microbial keratitis after corneal laser refractive surgery

Corneal laser refractive surgery is increasingly being performed on patients with the aim of improving unaided vision. Most candidates for surgery have excellent spectacle- or contact lens-corrected vision. Although microbial keratitis following refractive surgery is a rare complication, and usually has a good visual outcome, it can be sight-threatening. The spectrum of pathogens differs to other causes of microbial keratitis, such as contact lens-associated keratitis, and a different management approach is required. Postoperatively, patients are prescribed topical steroids and broad-spectrum topical antibiotics, typically fluoroquinolones. These do not cover unusual organisms, such as fungi, Nocardia, Acanthamoeba and some atypical mycobacteria. In post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis microbial keratitis, the lamellar flap should be lifted to acquire samples for specific microbiological examination, including these atypical organisms. Confocal microscopy is a noninvasive test that provides morphological information, and is operator dependent, but may assist in the rapid diagnosis of fungal, Acanthamoeba or Norcardia keratitis. PCR is not in widespread use, but has high sensitivity and specificity, and may facilitate early diagnosis and specific treatment of the causative organism, which is critical in obtaining the best clinical outcome.

Microbial keratitis trends following refractive surgery: results of the ASCRS infectious keratitis survey and comparisons with prior ASCRS surveys of infectious keratitis following keratorefractive procedures

In 2008, the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) surveyed its 9121 United States and international members to evaluate the changing trends and incidence, culture results, treatment, and visual outcomes of infectious keratitis following keratorefractive procedures worldwide. This paper presents and analyzes the results with comparisons to the data in surveys conducted in 2001 and 2004. Nineteen infections were reported by 14 surgeons who had performed an estimated 20,941 keratorefractive procedures, an incidence of 1 infection in every 1102 procedures. Sixteen cases presented in the first postoperative week, 1 case during the second week, 1 case between the second and fourth weeks, and 1 case at 1 month or later. The 16 cases that presented in the first week were diagnosed at initial presentation. The most common organism cultured was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Microbial keratitis following refractive surgery is an increasingly recognized sight-threatening complication.

Infectious keratitis in 18,651 laser surface ablation procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, culture results, risk factors, treatment strategies, and visual outcomes of infectious keratitis after surface ablation.

SETTING

Multicenter study in Spain.

DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who had surface ablation between January 2003 and December 2009 were reviewed to identify cases of infectious keratitis. The incidence, risk factors, clinical course, days to diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, and visual outcome were recorded. Main outcome measures were incidence of infectious keratitis after surface ablation, culture results, response to treatment, and visual outcomes.

RESULTS

The study reviewed the records of 9794 patients (18,651 eyes). Infectious keratitis after surface ablation was diagnosed in 39 eyes of 38 patients. The onset of infection was early (within 7 days after surgery) in 28 cases (71.79%). Cultures were positive in 13 of 27 cases in which samples were taken. The most frequently isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus species (9 cases). The final corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/20 or better in 23 cases (58.97%), 20/40 or better in 36 cases (92.30%), and worse than 20/40 in 3 cases (7.69%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of infectious keratitis after surface ablation was 0.20%. Infectious keratitis is a potentially vision-threatening complication. Prompt and aggressive management with an intensive regimen of fortified antibiotic agents is strongly recommended. Proper management can preserve useful vision in most cases.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Two cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis after Epi-LASIK

BACKGROUND

We describe two severe cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis following Epi-LASIK surgery.

CASES

One patient was a 23-year-old man who underwent Epi-LASIK surgery in both eyes. He developed an infectious corneal ulcer in one eye 2 days after surgery and was referred to us 7 days post-surgery with corneal perforation, for which we performed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. The other patient was a 32-year-old man who developed infectious keratitis in one eye 4 days after bilateral Epi-LASIK and was referred to us 2 days later.

OBSERVATIONS

Microbial testing revealed MRSA infection as the cause of the keratitis in both patients which was successfully treated with vancomycin eyedrops.

CONCLUSION

Infectious keratitis after refractive surgery is uncommon; it is important to diagnose this condition, identify the causative agent, and initiate treatment with appropriate antibiotics as soon as possible.

Fluoroquinolone therapy in a rabbit model of post-LASIK methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis

PURPOSE

To develop a rabbit model of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis for studying fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and treatment.

SETTING

Department of Microbiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.

METHODS

An MRSA keratitis isolate (5 microL, 500 colony forming units [CFU]) was inoculated underneath a corneal flap. Bacterial growth and pathology were determined by quantitative cultures (CFU) and slitlamp examination, respectively. The effectiveness of commercial moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin formulations was compared in 3 regimens: prophylaxis (4 drops before inoculation), early therapy (single drop hourly from 4 to 9 hours postinfection), and late therapy (single drop hourly from 10 to 15 hours postinfection). Zones of bacterial inhibition to known in vivo antibiotic concentrations were determined.

RESULTS

Bacteria grew to a maximum of approximately 10(6) CFU/cornea within 10 hours postinfection. The slitlamp examination scores showed pathologic changes beginning 10 hours postinfection and progressed throughout the infection. For prophylaxis, eyes treated with moxifloxacin had significantly fewer CFU than gatifloxacin-treated eyes or untreated controls (both P < or = .0001). During early treatment, the antibiotics were equally effective in reducing CFU relative to untreated controls (P < or = .0001). In late treatment, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin caused significant reductions in CFU relative to untreated controls (P < or = .0007 and P < or = .0001, respectively). Moxifloxacin produced zones of bacterial inhibition significantly larger than those produced by gatifloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Methicillin-resistant S aureus inoculation beneath a rabbit corneal flap produced an infection that was useful for quantitative microbiological studies. A significant advantage in using moxifloxacin relative to gatifloxacin was observed in prophylaxis of keratitis (P = .0001).

Bilateral methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy

A 52-year-old woman with a history of liver transplantation developed bilateral corneal infiltrates 1 week after uneventful photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Cultures grew methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), resistant to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. The infections responded to topical vancomycin and resolved bilaterally over 3 weeks. Three months postoperatively, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/20 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left eye; the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 20/20 in both eyes. During the course of treatment, the patient reported chronic intermittent prophylactic use of oral ciprofloxacin. While fluoroquinolones typically provide excellent postoperative coverage, Staphylococcus organisms have a growing antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones, and MRSA may become a more prevalent organism in corneal infections. Chronic subtherapeutic fluoroquinolone use can increase the mutational resistance of Staphylococcus to fluoroquinolone and methicillin. The patient's frequent hospital visits placed her at high risk for MRSA colonization. This case represents the fifth reported case of MRSA keratitis after PRK.