Outcomes of Simultaneous and Sequential Cross-linking With Excimer Laser Surface Ablation in Keratoconus

Development of a Web-Based Algorithm for Understanding the Intraocular Lens-Based Surgery in Stable and Progressing Keratoconus for Non-Specialist Ophthalmologists

PURPOSE

To propose an algorithm to facilitate lens-based surgery in keratoconus.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to prepare a software algorithm based on cone location, stability, best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (BSCVA) level and whether there is a clear or cataractous lens. The software usability was assessed through a 10-question questionnaire and two hypothetical keratoconus case histories (moderately simple and moderately complex) given to 15 trainees. The usability questionnaires were graded on a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) and two case histories (1 = very difficult to 7 = very easy).

RESULTS

The algorithm can be found at https://www.sussexeyelaserclinic.co.uk/keratoconus/. Thirteen trainees completed the questionnaire. 91.9% would frequently use it; for 100%, it was easy to use independently without technical support; for 63.7%, it was strongly integrated; for 100%, it was consistent; 100% thought that most people would learn to use it quickly, 91.9% found the system not cumbersome to use, felt very confident to use it and need not learn a lot to use it. The first case was found easy by 63.7% and the second by 45%.

CONCLUSION

We present an algorithm as a guide for lens-based surgery in stable and progressing keratoconus, which is classified based on cone location. This algorithm will help trainee and "non-specialist" ophthalmic surgeons understand the pre-operative planning for the surgery and referral to the "specialist" corneal surgeon, considering factors such as progression, BSCVA, keratometry, topography and apex location of the cone in keratoconus patients.

Keratoconus: exploring fundamentals and future perspectives - a comprehensive systematic review

Background

New developments in artificial intelligence, particularly with promising results in early detection and management of keratoconus, have favorably altered the natural history of the disease over the last few decades. Features of artificial intelligence in different machine such as anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and femtosecond laser technique have improved safety, precision, effectiveness, and predictability of treatment modalities of keratoconus (from contact lenses to keratoplasty techniques). These options ingrained in artificial intelligence are already underway and allow ophthalmologist to approach disease in the most non-invasive way.

Objectives

This study comprehensively describes all of the treatment modalities of keratoconus considering machine learning strategies.

Design

A multidimensional comprehensive systematic narrative review.

Data sources and methods

A comprehensive search was done in the five main electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane), without language and time or type of study restrictions. Afterward, eligible articles were selected by screening the titles and abstracts based on main mesh keywords. For potentially eligible articles, the full text was also reviewed.

Results

Artificial intelligence demonstrates promise in keratoconus diagnosis and clinical management, spanning early detection (especially in subclinical cases), preoperative screening, postoperative ectasia prediction after keratorefractive surgery, and guiding surgical decisions. The majority of studies employed a solitary machine learning algorithm, whereas minor studies assessed multiple algorithms that evaluated the association of various keratoconus staging and management strategies. Last but not least, AI has proven effective in guiding the implantation of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus corneas and predicting surgical outcomes.

Conclusion

The efficient and widespread clinical translation of machine learning models in keratoconus management is a crucial goal of potential future approaches to better visual performance in keratoconus patients.

Trial registration

The article has been registered through PROSPERO, an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews, with the ID: CRD42022319338.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of combined staged surgical treatment in patients with keratoconus

Purpose

This study performs comparative assessment of the results of different types of two-stage surgical treatment in patients with keratoconus, including combination of corneal collagen cross-linking with intrastromal corneal ring segments followed by topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy.

Materials and methods

Prospective review of 101 patients (101 eyes) with keratoconus was performed. Patients underwent corneal collagen cross-linking (32 patients), intrastromal corneal ring segments (48 patients), and a combination of these two procedures (21 patients). Transepithelial topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy was performed as the second stage of treatment in all patients with obtained stable refractive results at 8 months after first stage. Main outcome measures were visual acuity (uncorrected distance and corrected distance) and corneal topographic indices.

Results

Comparison of the studied parameters after first stage surgical treatment between non-combined CXL and combined groups demonstrated a statistically significant difference for uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, and cylindrical refraction values (p<0.05). We observed significant improvement of visual acuity and key corneal topographic indices after topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy in all study groups (p<0.05). In 50 (49.5%) patients customized excimer laser ablation gave the possibility of full spherical and cylindrical corrections. Ten eyes (10%) had delayed epithelial healing, no corneal stromal opacities developed.

Conclusions

This study shows that combined two-stage surgical treatment of keratoconus, consisting of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation with corneal collagen cross-linking followed by topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy, is clinically more effective to prevent keratectasia progression and increase visual acuity than the use of non-combined two-stage techniques.

Causes for Rejection of Keratorefractive Surgery in a Central Indian Population

Aim

To identify the reasons for refusing refractive surgery in patients visiting for spectacle-free vision.

Methodology

Medical records of 296 patients who presented for keratorefractive surgery (KRS) from June 2017 to April 2020 at a tertiary eye care center in central India (Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India) were reviewed. Demographic details of all the patients and parameters obtained during workup of a case presented for KRSs were captured in an Excel^® sheet and analyzed statistically.

Results

Of the 296 patients who presented for KRS during the study period, 86 (29.1%) patients were denied KRS. The mean pachymetry in the right eye was 505 μm ± 10 μm (range 520-485 μm) and 502 μm ± 7 μm (511-490 μm) in the left eye. Suboptimal corneal thickness (n = 28, 32.6%) was the most common reason for rejection. Other reasons for not recommending the procedure were high myopia (n = 20, 23.3%), spectacle not stable (n = 16, 18.6%), and keratoconus (n = 11, 12.8%). Collagen vascular diseases (n = 3, 3.5%) and anxiety about the procedure (n = 2, 2.3%) were causes unrelated to the procedure. No correlation was observed between corneal thickness and degree of myopia (r = 0.014, p = 0.66).

Conclusion

Patients presenting for KRS exhibit various problems. Meticulous preoperative evaluation is most important for long-term visual outcome. Suboptimal corneal thickness, high myopia, unstable spectacle correction, and keratoconus were the common reasons for not performing KRS in the study population.

Changes in higher order aberrations after central corneal regularization - a comparative two-year analysis of a semi-automated topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy combined with corneal cross-linking

Background

The optical quality in progressive keratoconus deteriorates due to ectasia and distortion of the corneal shape and optics. While corneal cross-linking (CXL) aims at stopping disease progression, “CXL-Plus” combines CXL with excimer laser ablation to improve visual function. Central Corneal Regularization (CCR) represents a therapeutic excimer laser modality specifically designed to smoothen the ectatic corneal shape and to reduce higher order aberrations (HOA). We set out to compare CXL-Plus, consisting of CXL combined with CCR, with CXL by itself for patients with progressive keratoconus.

Methods

Retrospective 2-year matched group analysis of patients who either underwent CXL-Plus (n = 28) or CXL as a sole procedure (n = 28) for progressive keratoconus. Main outcome parameters were HOA, visual function and tomographic results 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

After 12 months, the total HOA root mean square wavefront error was reduced from 0.79 ± 0.30 to 0.40 ± 0.19 μm (CXL-Plus; p <  0.0001) and changed from 0.71 ± 0.28 to 0.73 ± 0.36 μm (CXL; p = 0.814). Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.70 ± 0.35 to 0.36 ± 0.29 logMAR (CXL-Plus; p = 0.0002) and from 0.65 ± 0.39 to 0.46 ± 0.37 logMAR (CXL; p = 0.067), translating to gains of three or more lines in 50% (CXL-Plus) and 36% (CXL) of patients. The steepest keratometry value (Kmax) regressed by 5.84 D (CXL-Plus; p <  0.0001) and 0.66 D (CXL; p = 0.752). For none of the investigated parameters a statistically significant change could be shown between 12 and 24 months.

Conclusions

CXL-Plus in the form of a CCR reduces HOA and Kmax more effectively than CXL as a sole procedure.

Combined Protocols for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Photorefractive Surgery for Refractive Management of Keratoconus: Update on Techniques and Review of Literature

With the development and gradual dissemination of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in the twenty-first century as an early treatment for keratoconus, the management paradigm has shifted to include a greater focus on complete refractive correction for these patients. Though supplemental hard contact lens therapy remains a mainstay of visual rehabilitation in keratoconus, there has been increasing appeal in a completely surgical approach by combining CXL with adjuvant refractive procedures to both halt the ectatic process and enhance functional visual outcomes. Collectively termed "CXL plus" procedures, several combined protocols have been studied to various degrees in conjunction with CXL, involving photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK), conductive keratoplasty (CK), intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation, phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation, or multiple of these techniques together. The scope of this review aims to encompass a summary of current CXL protocols and present the current status of studies involving adjunctive keratorefractive procedures combined with CXL. By discussing the results to date of these CXL plus protocols, we can assess what further areas of investigation are necessary within this field as the next step to optimizing treatment modalities and outcomes for our keratoconus patients, regardless of disease severity.