1
|
Cheng X, Zhao Y, Fu D, Zhou X, Gao Y, Yu Z. Posterior corneal stability after small incision lenticule extraction with different optical zones. Eye (Lond) 2024; 38:3087-3092. [PMID: 38997503 PMCID: PMC11543940 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03224-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the changes in the posterior corneal surface following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with different optical zones. METHODS In this retrospective study, 106 eyes of 106 patients who underwent SMILE were recruited 3 years after the procedure. Eyes were divided into two groups according to the size of the surgical optical zone: group A (52 eyes, ≤6.2 mm) and group B (54 eyes, ≥6.5 mm). Posterior central elevation (PCE) and 12 other points at 45°, 135°, 225° and 315° with distances of 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm from the centre were recorded from Pentacam. RESULTS No iatrogenic keratectasia was identified, and eyes in the two groups showed comparable visual results. The overall trend in posterior corneal elevation changes was consistent for both groups. PCE decreased significantly from 1.33 ± 2.32 to 0.75 ± 2.41 in group A (P = 0.024) and from 0.87 ± 2.61 to 0.06 ± 2.74 in group B (P = 0.003). All points in the central 2 mm region in both groups were reduced postoperatively. In the 4 mm and 6 mm corneal annulus, almost all points at 225°and 315° showed backward displacement, with the most prominent change occurring at 315° in the 6 mm annulus (P < 0.001), indicating no forward protrusion in the inferior area. CONCLUSIONS No forward protrusion in the posterior corneal surface was observed 3 years after SMILE with different optical zones. Comprehensive preoperative measurements are essential for ensuring corneal stability and avoiding iatrogenic keratectasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueying Cheng
- Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yu Zhao
- Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, NHC, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Fu
- Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, NHC, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, NHC, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Gao
- Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Zhiqiang Yu
- Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, NHC, Shanghai, China.
- Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Han T, Han X, Liu L, Wang Y, Peng X, Zhou X. Genetic Estimates of Correlation and Causality Between Keratoconus and Osteoarthritis. Cornea 2024:00003226-990000000-00720. [PMID: 39499159 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The relationship between keratoconus (KC) and osteoarthritis (OA) has been hypothesized, yet the causal link remained obscure. We aimed to evaluate the genetic correlation and causality between KC and OA through a genetic perspective. METHODS Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis were conducted. Data were used from genome-wide association study on KC (4669 cases and 116,547 controls), OA (encompassing 24,955 patients with knee OA, 15,704 patients with hip OA, 39,427 patients with knee or hip OA, and 378,169 control participants), and KC data in the FinnGen consortium for replication and meta-analysis. Simple model, weighted model, inverse-variance weighted, weighted median, and MR-Egger regression were employed to assess the causal effects. MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier method, MR-Egger method, and leave-one-out analysis were also applied to detect pleiotropy. RESULTS No statistically significant genetic correlation between KC and OA (all P > 0.05) were observed. MR estimates obtained from all 5 methods after meta-analysis revealed nonsignificant odds ratio values of KC-related traits to knee OA, hip OA, and OA (all adjusted P > 0.05). No evidence of causal relationships of knee and hip OA with KC-related traits was detected after meta-analysis of all 5 MR methods (all adjusted P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The large MR analysis indicated that KC may not be causally associated with a risk of OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Han
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China
- Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry Shanghai, Shanghai, China; and
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaosong Han
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China
- Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry Shanghai, Shanghai, China; and
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Shanghai, China
| | - Liu Liu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China
- Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry Shanghai, Shanghai, China; and
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuliang Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China
- Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry Shanghai, Shanghai, China; and
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoliao Peng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China
- Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry Shanghai, Shanghai, China; and
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Shanghai, China
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China
- Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry Shanghai, Shanghai, China; and
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Panigrahi T, Khamar P, Shetty R, Kannan R, Ashok N, Nishtala K, Ghosh A, Deshpande V. Longitudinal analysis of wound healing response post SMILE and LASIK surgery using proteomic profiling of tears. Exp Eye Res 2024; 246:109987. [PMID: 38964497 DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2024.109987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Different types of refractive surgeries often exhibit differences in wound healing responses. The current study investigated post-operative tear protein profiles in subjects who underwent LASIK and SMILE to elucidate global changes to the proteomic profile during the period the patient cornea undergoes healing. In this study, 10 patients underwent LASIK and SMILE surgery with a contralateral paired eye design. Tear samples were collected using Schirmer's strips preoperatively, at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Quantitative ITRAQ labeled proteomics was performed and the tear protein ratios were normalized to pre-operative protein levels for each subject. Whole proteomics identified 1345 proteins in tears from LASIK and 1584 proteins in SMILE across time points. About 67 proteins were common in LASIK and SMILE tears across all the time points. Wound healing responses were differentially regulated between two refractive surgeries (SMILE and LASIK). The proteins Ceruloplasmin, Clusterin, Serotransferrin were upregulated at 1 month and 3 months and downregulated at 6 months post operatively in LASIK surgery where as in SMILE these were downregulated. Galectin 3 binding protein showed upregulation at 1 month and the levels decreased at 3 months and 6 months postop in LASIK tears whereas the levels increased at 3 months and 6 months post-op in SMILE tears. The levels of proteins that protect from oxidative stress were higher in SMILE as compared to LASIK postoperatively. The extracellular matrix proteins showed an increase in expression at 6 months in SMILE tears and was stabilized at 6 months in LASIK tears post operatively. Different refractive surgeries induce distinct wound healing responses as identified in tears. This study has implications in targeting key proteins for improving the clinical outcome postrefractive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pooja Khamar
- Cornea and Refractive Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India
| | - Rohit Shetty
- Cornea and Refractive Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India
| | - Ramaraj Kannan
- GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India
| | - Nikhil Ashok
- GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India
| | | | - Arkasubhra Ghosh
- GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
| | - Vrushali Deshpande
- GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ambrósio R, Salomão MQ, Barros L, da Fonseca Filho JBR, Guedes J, Neto A, Machado AP, Lopes BT, Sena N, Esporcatte LPG. Multimodal diagnostics for keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases: a paradigm shift. EYE AND VISION (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 10:45. [PMID: 37919821 PMCID: PMC10623885 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-023-00363-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Different diagnostic approaches for ectatic corneal diseases (ECD) include screening, diagnosis confirmation, classification of the ECD type, severity staging, prognostic evaluation, and clinical follow-up. The comprehensive assessment must start with a directed clinical history. However, multimodal imaging tools, including Placido-disk topography, Scheimpflug three-dimensional (3D) tomography, corneal biomechanical evaluations, and layered (or segmental) tomography with epithelial thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT), or digital very high-frequency ultrasound (dVHF-US) serve as fundamental complementary exams for measuring different characteristics of the cornea. Also, ocular wavefront analysis, axial length measurements, corneal specular or confocal microscopy, and genetic or molecular biology tests are relevant for clinical decisions. Artificial intelligence enhances interpretation and enables combining such a plethora of data, boosting accuracy and facilitating clinical decisions. The applications of diagnostic information for individualized treatments became relevant concerning the therapeutic refractive procedures that emerged as alternatives to keratoplasty. The first paradigm shift concerns the surgical management of patients with ECD with different techniques, such as crosslinking and intrastromal corneal ring segments. A second paradigm shift involved the quest for identifying patients at higher risk of progressive iatrogenic ectasia after elective refractive corrections on the cornea. Beyond augmenting the sensitivity to detect very mild (subclinical or fruste) forms of ECD, ectasia risk assessment evolved to characterize the inherent susceptibility for ectasia development and progression. Furthermore, ectasia risk is also related to environmental factors, including eye rubbing and the relational impact of the surgical procedure on the cornea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Ambrósio
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil.
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil.
| | - Marcella Q Salomão
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
- Benjamin Constant Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lorena Barros
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
| | - João Batista R da Fonseca Filho
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
| | - Jaime Guedes
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Neto
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Aydano P Machado
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
- Computing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil
| | - Bernardo T Lopes
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Nelson Sena
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
| | - Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Rio Vision Hospital, Rua Prudente de Moraes, 1276, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22420-042, Brazil
- Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wagner FM, Sekundo W. Iatrogenic Keratectasia after Refractive Surgery - Causes, Prophylaxis, Therapy. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2023; 240:783-794. [PMID: 37348513 DOI: 10.1055/a-2073-8478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Iatrogenic keratectasia is induced thinning and protrusion of the cornea after laser refractive surgery. Known risk factors include an excessively thin postoperative residual stromal bed, a thicker flap, or preoperatively undetected evidence of preexisting subclinical keratoconus. The rate of post-refractive ectasia in eyes without identifiable preoperative risk factors is 20 per 100 000 eyes for photorefractive keratectomy, 90 per 100 000 eyes for laser in situ keratomileusis, and 11 per 100 000 eyes for small incision lenticule extraction. Traditional screening tools for preoperative risk include the ectasia risk score system and percentage of tissue alteration. More recent methods include corneal elastography and epithelial mapping, in addition to Artificial Intelligence methods for data analysis. Therapy includes contact lenses, cross-linking, implantation of intracorneal ring segments, penetrating or lamellar keratoplasty, and, in early studies, implantation of corneal lenticules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Mathias Wagner
- Universitätsaugenklinik Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
- Universitätsaugenklinik Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bao F, Lopes BT, Zheng X, Ji Y, Wang J, Elsheikh A. Corneal Biomechanics Losses Caused by Refractive Surgery. Curr Eye Res 2023; 48:137-143. [PMID: 36001080 DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2103569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances, specifically in the understanding of the biomechanical properties of the cornea and its response to diseases and surgical interventions, have significantly improved the safety and surgical outcomes of corneal refractive surgery, whose popularity and demand continue to grow worldwide. However, iatrogenic keratectasia resulting from the deterioration in corneal biomechanics caused by surgical interventions, although rare, remains a global concern. On one hand, in vivo biomechanical evaluation, enabled by clinical imaging systems such as the ORA and the Corvis ST, has significantly improved the risk profiling of patients for iatrogenic keratectasia. That is despite the fact the biomechanical metrics provided by these systems are considered indicators of the cornea's overall stiffness rather than its intrinsic material properties. On the other hand, new surgical modalities including SMILE were introduced to offer superior biomechanical performance to LASIK, but this superiority could not be proven clinically, creating more myths than answers. The literature also includes sound evidence that tPRK provided the highest preservation of corneal biomechanics when compared to both LASIK and SMILE. The aim of this review is twofold; to discuss the importance of corneal biomechanical evaluation prior to refractive surgery, and to assess the current understanding of cornea's biomechanical deterioration caused by mainstream corneal refractive surgeries. The review has led to an observation that new imaging techniques, parameters and evaluation systems may be needed to reflect the true advantages of specific refractive techniques and when these advantages are significant enough to offer better protection against post-surgery complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- FangJun Bao
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.,The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Bernardo T Lopes
- School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - XiaoBo Zheng
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.,The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - YuXin Ji
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - JunJie Wang
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.,The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ahmed Elsheikh
- School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xin Y, Lopes BT, Wang J, Wu J, Zhu M, Jiang M, Miao Y, Lin H, Cao S, Zheng X, Eliasy A, Chen S, Wang Q, Ye Y, Bao F, Elsheikh A. Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:834270. [PMID: 35433653 PMCID: PMC9009506 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.834270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to three laser refractive surgeries. Methods: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients who submitted to transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) were included in this study. All cases were examined with the Corvis ST preoperatively (up to 3 months) and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months, and the differences in the main device parameters were assessed. The three groups were matched in age, gender ratio, corneal thickness, refractive error corrections, optical zone diameter, and intraocular pressure. They were also matched in the preoperative biomechanical metrics provided by the Corvis ST including stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), and deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm). Results: The results demonstrated a significant decrease post-operation in SP-A1 and significant increases in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm (p < 0.05), all of which indicated reductions in overall corneal stiffness. Inter-procedure comparisons provided evidence that the smallest overall stiffness reduction was in the tPRK group, followed by the SMILE, and then the FS-LASIK group (p < 0.05). These results remained valid after correction for the change in CCT between pre and 6 months post-operation and for the percentage tissue altered. In all three surgery groups, higher degrees of refractive correction resulted in larger overall stiffness losses based on most of the biomechanical metrics. Conclusion: The corneal biomechanical response to the three surgery procedures varied significantly. With similar corneal thickness loss, the reductions in overall corneal stiffness were the highest in FS-LASIK and the lowest in tPRK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Xin
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Bernardo T. Lopes
- School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - JunJie Wang
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Jie Wu
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - ManMan Zhu
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - MuChen Jiang
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - YuanYuan Miao
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - HuiNi Lin
- STU-CUHKJoint Shantou International Eye Center, Shantou, China
| | - Si Cao
- Wuhan Puren Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - XiaoBo Zheng
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ashkan Eliasy
- School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - ShiHao Chen
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- *Correspondence: ShiHao Chen, ; YuFeng Ye, ; FangJun Bao,
| | - QinMei Wang
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - YuFeng Ye
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- *Correspondence: ShiHao Chen, ; YuFeng Ye, ; FangJun Bao,
| | - FangJun Bao
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- *Correspondence: ShiHao Chen, ; YuFeng Ye, ; FangJun Bao,
| | - Ahmed Elsheikh
- School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Novel artificial intelligence index based on Scheimpflug corneal tomography to distinguish subclinical keratoconus from healthy corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022; 48:1168-1174. [PMID: 35333829 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the efficiency of an index derived from multiple logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to measure differences in corneal tomography findings between subclinical keratoconus (SKC) in one eye, corneal ectasia, and healthy corneas. SETTING Two private Brazilian ophthalmological centers. DESIGN Multicenter, case-control study. METHODS This study included 187 eyes with very asymmetric ectasia and normal corneal topography and tomography (VAE-NTT) in the VAE-NTT group (G), 2,296 eyes with healthy corneas in the control group (CG), and 410 eyes with ectasia in the ectasia group. An index, termed as Boosted Ectasia Susceptibility Tomography Index (BESTi), was derived using MLRA to identify a cutoff point to distinguish patients in the three groups. The groups were divided into two subgroups with equal number of patients: validation set and external validation (EV) set. RESULTS BESTi had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 with 86.02% sensitivity (Se) and 83.97% specificity (Sp) between CG and VAE-NTT G in the EV set, which were significantly greater than those of the Belin-Ambrósio Deviation Index (BAD-D; AUC: 0.81; Se: 66.67%; Sp: 82.67%; P < .0001) and Pentacam Random Forest Index (PRFI; AUC: 0.87; Se: 78.49%; Sp: 79.88%; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS BESTi facilitated early detection of ectasia in SKC. BESTi demonstrated higher Se and Sp than PRFI and BAD-D for detecting SKC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Goupillou P, Boutillier G, Naguszewski D, Muraine M. Long-term follow-up of bilateral ectasia after laser-assisted Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) with known risk factors. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022; 33:NP14-NP17. [PMID: 35234069 DOI: 10.1177/11206721221085397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the long-term follow-up of bilateral ectasia after laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with known risk factors. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 23-year-old woman. Preoperative refraction was - 7.25 -2.00 × 20 in the right eye and -7.25 -1.50 × 155 in the left eye. Maximal keratometry was 47.32 diopters and 48.37 diopters, respectively, which was a contraindication to Laser Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) and a SMILE was proposed in 2015. One year after surgery, ectasia developed in the left eye and crosslinking (CXL) was performed. Two years after surgery, ectasia also developed in the right eye and CXL was also performed, leading to stabilization in both eyes five years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Known contraindications for LASIK are also contraindications for the performance of refractive surgery with SMILE. CXL is an efficient treatment of post-SMILE corneal ectasia.
Collapse
|
10
|
Brar S, Roopashree CR, Ganesh S. Incidence of Ectasia After SMILE From a High-Volume Refractive Surgery Center in India. J Refract Surg 2021; 37:800-808. [PMID: 34914554 DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20210812-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the incidence of ectasia after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in a high-volume refractive surgery center in India. METHODS To derive the incidence of ectasia after SMILE, all eyes that underwent SMILE or SMILE Xtra (SMILE combined with prophylactic accelerated corneal cross-linking) from November 2012 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Furthermore, these cases were classified as being "normal" or "borderline" based on certain predefined criteria. Only eyes with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. RESULTS Of the total 7,024 eyes analyzed, 6,619 eyes underwent SMILE, of which 10 eyes developed ectasia at a mean interval of 21.3 months, making the incidence of ectasia after SMILE 0.15%. Of these 10 eyes with ectasia, 2 eyes had normal preoperative topography, whereas the remaining 8 eyes were borderline as per the predefined criteria. Retrospective data analysis revealed that 6,025 of 7,024 eyes were normal and thus suitable for a standard SMILE procedure, whereas 999 eyes were borderline, of which 594 eyes underwent SMILE and 405 eyes underwent SMILE Xtra. The incidence of ectasia in borderline eyes undergoing SMILE was 0.80% (8 of 999) versus 0% (none) for borderline eyes undergoing SMILE Xtra (chi square, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of ectasia after SMILE in the early postoperative period was 0.15%, with borderline eyes accounting for most cases. Borderline eyes treated with SMILE Xtra did not progress to ectasia, potentially suggesting a protective role of simultaneous CXL. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(12):800-808.].
Collapse
|
11
|
Moshirfar M, Tukan AN, Bundogji N, Liu HY, McCabe SE, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. Ectasia After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther 2021; 10:753-776. [PMID: 34417707 PMCID: PMC8589911 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-021-00383-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of ectasia following refractive surgery is unclear. This review sought to determine the worldwide rates of ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) based on reports in the literature. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Publications were identified by a search of eight electronic databases for relevant terms between 1984 and 2021. Patient characteristics and preoperative values including manifest refractive spherical refractive equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior keratometry, postoperative residual stromal bed (RSB), and percent tissue altered (PTA) were summarized. In addition, annual rates of each refractive surgery were determined, and incidence of post-refractive ectasia for each type was calculated using the number of ectatic eyes identified in the literature. RESULTS In total, 57 eyes (70 eyes including those with preoperative risk factors for ectasia) were identified to have post-PRK ectasia, while 1453 eyes (1681 eyes including risk factors) had post-LASIK ectasia, and 11 eyes (19 eyes including risk factors) had post-SMILE ectasia. Cases of refractive surgery performed annually were estimated as 283,920 for PRK, 1,608,880 for LASIK, and 96,750 for SMILE. Reported post-refractive ectasia in eyes without preoperative identifiable risk factors occurred with the following incidences: 20 per 100,000 eyes in PRK, 90 per 100,000 eyes in LASIK, and 11 per 100,000 eyes in SMILE. The rate of ectasia in LASIK was found to be 4.5 times higher than that of PRK. CONCLUSION Post-refractive ectasia occurs at lower rates in eyes undergoing PRK than LASIK. Although SMILE appears to have the lowest rate of ectasia, the number of cases already reported since its recent approval suggests that post-SMILE ectasia may become a concern. Considering that keratoconus is a spectrum of disease, pre-existing keratoconus may play a larger role in postoperative ectasia than previously accounted for in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Moshirfar
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT, 84020, USA.
- John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT, USA.
| | - Alyson N Tukan
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Nour Bundogji
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Harry Y Liu
- McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shannon E McCabe
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT, 84020, USA
- Mission Hills Eye Center, Pleasant Hill, CA, USA
| | - Yasmyne C Ronquillo
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT, 84020, USA
| | - Phillip C Hoopes
- Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State Street Suite #200, Draper, UT, 84020, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ates KM, Estes AJ, Liu Y. Potential underlying genetic associations between keratoconus and diabetes mellitus. ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2021; 1:100005. [PMID: 34746916 PMCID: PMC8570550 DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2021.100005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Keratoconus (KC) is the most common ectatic corneal disease, characterized by significantly localized thinning of the corneal stroma. Genetic, environmental, hormonal, and metabolic factors contribute to the pathogenesis of KC. Additionally, multiple comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, may affect the risk of KC. Main Body Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have been reported to have lower risk of developing KC by way of increased endogenous collagen crosslinking in response to chronic hyperglycemia. However, this remains a debated topic as other studies have suggested either a positive association or no association between DM and KC. To gain further insight into the underlying genetic components of these two diseases, we reviewed candidate genes associated with KC and central corneal thickness in the literature. We then explored how these genes may be regulated similarly or differentially under hyperglycemic conditions and the role they play in the systemic complications associated with DM. Conclusion Our comprehensive review of potential genetic factors underlying KC and DM provides a direction for future studies to further determine the genetic etiology of KC and how it is influenced by systemic diseases such as diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M. Ates
- Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Amy J. Estes
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
- James and Jean Culver Vision Discovery Institute, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Yutao Liu
- Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
- James and Jean Culver Vision Discovery Institute, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
- Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Management of small-incision lenticule extraction ectasia using tissue addition and pocket crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47:407-412. [PMID: 32694305 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The feasibility of managing ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using tissue addition and pocket corneal crosslinking (CXL) is described. Four eyes of 3 patients (mean age 25.7 years) developed features of keraectasia at a mean period of 3 years after SMILE for myopia. All cases were managed with insertion of heterologous SMILE lenticules in the previously created pocket, followed by simultaneous accelerated CXL. At a mean follow-up of 7.67 months, there was improvement in corrected distance visual acuity and reduction in keratometry and higher-order aberrations in all eyes. The visual, refractive, and topographic parameters remained stable at the last visit compared with the 2-week follow-up visit. No eye developed haze, infection, or rejection requiring tissue explantation. Early experience showed tissue addition with simultaneous pocket CXL to be a feasible approach for managing ectasia after SMILE. However, further follow-up is required to establish the long-term safety and effects on corneal stabilization.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sachdev GS, Ramamurthy S. Decade - long journey with small incision lenticule extraction: The learnings. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020; 68:2705-2710. [PMID: 33229646 PMCID: PMC7856951 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_2622_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) has revolutionized the field of keratorefractive surgery. With the promise of superior corneal biomechanics and reduced postoperative dry eye, SMILE afforded a distinct advantage over flap-based procedures. Our evolving understanding of the surgical technique and management of its unique complications has further enhanced the outcomes. This review will highlight specific pearls on various preoperative and intraoperative principles allowing optimization of outcomes with SMILE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gitansha S Sachdev
- Refractive Services, The Eye Foundation, RS Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Shreyas Ramamurthy
- Refractive Services, The Eye Foundation, RS Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brar S, Gautam M, Sute SS, Ganesh S. Refractive surgery with simultaneous collagen cross-linking for borderline corneas - A review of different techniques, their protocols and clinical outcomes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020; 68:2744-2756. [PMID: 33229650 PMCID: PMC7856924 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1709_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simultaneous corneal cross-linking (CXL) has been proposed as an adjunct therapy to corneal refractive procedures to prevent future ectasia, especially when performed in borderline corneas. This review analyses the currently available literature (minimum follow-up 6 months) on corneal refractive surgery and simultaneous CXL (PRK Xtra, LASIK Xtra, and SMILE Xtra) to evaluate the overall results including the safety, efficacy, and potential complications associated with these procedures. A comprehensive literature search of various electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane database, and MEDLINE) was performed up to 20th May 2020. Four relevant studies were found for PRK Xtra, 12 for LASIK Xtra, and 3 for SMILE Xtra. The total number of eyes included in this review was 1,512: 294 for PRK Xtra, 221 for PRK-only, 446 eyes for LASIK Xtra, 398 eyes for LASIK-only, 91 for SMILE Xtra and 62 for SMILE-only. Current literature suggests that refractive surgery and simultaneous CXL is generally safe and delivers comparable results in terms of visual and refractive outcomes than refractive surgery alone. However, there is no consensus on a standard cross-linking protocol, and complications such as diffuse lamellar keratitis, central toxic keratopathy, and corneal ectasia following Xtra procedures have been reported. It is therefore suggested that surgeons exercise caution in case-selection and counsel their patients regarding the potential risks and benefits with Xtra procedures. Also, further studies are required to standardize the UV-A irradiation protocols and to evaluate the long-term effect on safety, refractive predictability, and stability of these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheetal Brar
- Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Megha Gautam
- Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Smith Snehal Sute
- Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Sri Ganesh
- Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Torres-Netto EA, Spiru B, Kling S, Gilardoni F, Lazaridis A, Sekundo W, Hafezi F. Similar Biomechanical Cross-linking Effect After SMILE and PRK in Human Corneas in an Ex Vivo Model for Postoperative Ectasia. J Refract Surg 2020; 36:49-54. [PMID: 31917851 DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20191211-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the biomechanical effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in paired human corneas following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in an ex vivo model for postoperative ectasia. METHODS Twenty-six paired human corneas preserved in tissue culture medium were equally divided into two groups: right and left corneas were treated with PRK and SMILE, respectively. Corneal thickness was measured in all eyes before surgery. Corneas were stretched using an extensometer with two cycles of up to 9 N (570 kPA stress), followed by accelerated CXL with irradiance of 9 mW/cm2 for 10 minutes (fluence 5.4 J/cm2) in both groups. The elastic modulus was evaluated using two-dimensional stress-strain extensometry. RESULTS Following accelerated CXL, the ectatic cornea model showed a mean effective elastic modulus of 17.2 ± 5.3 MPa after PRK and 14.1 ± 5.0 MPa after SMILE. Although the elastic modulus in corneas previously subjected to PRK was higher, there was no significant biomechanical difference between the two groups (P = .093). CONCLUSIONS Under similar conditions, both experimental groups (PRK followed by CXL and SMILE followed by CXL) were characterized by similar biomechanical stability as measured experimentally on ex vivo human fellow corneas. The data suggest that, in the event of postoperative ectasia, the biomechanical improvement achieved by CXL may be similar after PRK and SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(1):49-54].
Collapse
|
17
|
Chong JK, Hamilton DR. SMILE for Myopic Astigmatism: Early Experience in the USA and International Advances. CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40135-020-00250-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
18
|
Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Piñero DP. Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for Screening in Laser Refractive Surgery. J Refract Surg 2020; 35:398. [PMID: 31185106 DOI: 10.3928/1081597x-20190520-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
19
|
|
20
|
Esporcatte LPG, Salomão MQ, Lopes BT, Vinciguerra P, Vinciguerra R, Roberts C, Elsheikh A, Dawson DG, Ambrósio R. Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea. EYE AND VISION 2020; 7:9. [PMID: 32042837 PMCID: PMC7001259 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-020-0174-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Corneal biomechanics has been a hot topic for research in contemporary ophthalmology due to its prospective applications in diagnosis, management, and treatment of several clinical conditions, including glaucoma, elective keratorefractive surgery, and different corneal diseases. The clinical biomechanical investigation has become of great importance in the setting of refractive surgery to identify patients at higher risk of developing iatrogenic ectasia after laser vision correction. This review discusses the latest developments in the detection of corneal ectatic diseases. These developments should be considered in conjunction with multimodal corneal and refractive imaging, including Placido-disk based corneal topography, Scheimpflug corneal tomography, anterior segment tomography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), very-high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US), ocular biometry, and ocular wavefront measurements. The ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST are non-contact tonometry systems that provide a clinical corneal biomechanical assessment. More recently, Brillouin optical microscopy has been demonstrated to provide in vivo biomechanical measurements. The integration of tomographic and biomechanical data into artificial intelligence techniques has demonstrated the ability to increase the accuracy to detect ectatic disease and characterize the inherent susceptibility for biomechanical failure and ectasia progression, which is a severe complication after laser vision correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rua Conde de Bonfim 211 / 712, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20520-050 Brazil.,3Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Marcella Q Salomão
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rua Conde de Bonfim 211 / 712, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20520-050 Brazil.,Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil.,5Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Instituto Benjamin Constant, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Bernardo T Lopes
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,7School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH UK
| | - Paolo Vinciguerra
- 8Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.,9Eye Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Vinciguerra
- 7School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH UK.,Department of Ophthalmology, Humanitas San Pio X Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Cynthia Roberts
- 11Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Ahmed Elsheikh
- 7School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH UK.,12School of Biological Science and Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.,13NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Daniel G Dawson
- 14The University of Florida Department of Ophthalmology, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Renato Ambrósio
- Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rua Conde de Bonfim 211 / 712, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20520-050 Brazil.,Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis - BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil.,5Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,15Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|